ICHALO NACHIPENA – NAWAKWI

19

ICHALO NACHIPENA – NAWAKWI

“I want to ask! Does it mean there are no men or women at ECZ? I knew (ECZ commissioner) Ndiyoi Mutiti as a lady of very very extreme, not high, but extreme integrity. I knew her from the university as a lady of firmness and extreme integrity. She built the National Archives,” said Nawakwi to Daily Revelation. “Now she’s in the midst of mayhem and want to mess her name up and she’s going along with that.”

Nawakwi said she was concerned especially that the person involved was one of her acquaintances in the university.

19 COMMENTS

  4. ZIBAZAKO NAWAKWI! WHEN YOU AS A MEMBER OF THOSE 22 PROMINENT MMD MEMBERS LEFT THE PARTY AND FORMED FDD, AND YOU NAWAKWI STARTED CALLING FTJ CHILUBA AS A THIEF, DID NDIYOYI MUTITI WRITE ANYTHING SUGGESTING THAT YOU HAD DEGRADED YOURSELF BY SO ACTING? STOP THESE INNUENDOS, THEY ADD NOTHING TO YOUR DWINDLING POLITICAL FORTUNES! JUST TRY TO CONTEST THE PF PRESIDENCY. THE ACT ALONE CAN REVIVE YOUR POLITICAL CAREER.

  5. Every body is mad, it depends on the degree of madness. Since you are clearly showing that you are mad, every body else’s madness can be ignored, except your madness.

  6. Maybe if we interviewed Madam Ndiyoi Mutiti she would say the exact words about you Madam Nawakwi? Biblical Matters of “Specks and Logs in others eyes and our eyes”, sichoncho?

  8. Right on madam Nawakwi, some people can easily be bulldozed. But what they forget is that their integrity is being eroded and they will never be looked at highly by sane people of Zambia. Hichilema will not be there forever, one day he will be out of office, but their names will have been dented, and other leaders will not think of them highly. And that will spell doom to their careers! Professionals must know that once a professional always a professional. Not agreeing to do dirty for a few pieces of silver! Betraying Zambian people. Those bad actions by ECZ are not sustainable, they will soon dry up like water in the desert. And they will be wondering what has hit them! It will be the end! You cannot fool 15 million plus Zambians. Remember those are just offices, and a lot of people have passed through and left them, but Zambia a country and it’s contents have remained intact! Does anybody know where the frog that stood against super Ken Kaunda for decades is buried? But it’s past now and it’s gone! Kaunda thought Zambians are very dull and fools for decades, by standing against a frog. But those tricks came to an end one day and those who were doing that where at the same ECZ, they disappeared faster than Kaunda! Nobody held them in high esteem! They were looked at as betrayers! Worse than Judas! So what the commissioners and employees are doing at ECZ is very clear that they are being dictated to! But for how long can one do that? Too bad for those old people at ECZ, being treated like children!

    • HOW YOU WANT TO PENESHA ICHALO BUT YOU WILL END-UP [ UKUPENA WEMWINE ] INTANNGLED IN IT.
      ( the resources are very scarce hence every one in this country, especially those serving in public offices in our country should Always work hardhato to minimise unnecessary expenditures, westages and put control measures in place – the case of bye-elections in Kabushi and Kwacha Constituencies, why did the courts nullify these seats if they knew and know that the same MPS who were there will stand again, why didn’t you MAINTAIN them ? Why? I don’t understand this. Otherwise, entattaining such cases just to allow the two who caused the bye- election is what can be termed as ” ICHALO NACHIPENA, IF AT ALL ICHALO CHILAPENA MADAM NAWAKWI”. Otherwise this is delela like MALEMA will call it.
      NOW,
      Even when this case is presided on, on Monday, I had time to read through some clauses in the Zambian 2016 amended constitution and this have to be explained to some of us if not all;
      (1).article 52, (6) where a candidate dies, resigns or becomes disqualified in accordance with article 70,100 or 153 or a court disqualifies a candidate for corruption or malpractice, after the close of nomination and before the election date, the electoral commission shall cancel the election and require the filing of fresh nomination by eligible candidates and elections shall be held within 30 days of the filing of the fresh nomination. Now the question here is, and that I ask as a Zambian with the rights to vote, was there malpractice or corruption involved in the nullification of the Kabushi and kwacha constituencies elections?/ these two seats? If the answer is yes, then the two who were MPS by then do not qualify to re-contest because of these practices that led to the nullification of the seats. But if or in the event that the ECZ had allowed them to submit and accept their nomination papers then the above clause, article (52), (6) could have been applied / happened and nominations could have been cancelled and new nominations and elections date set because of the two who would have been or were involved in malpractice including corruption hence becoming in-eligible or disqualified and prompt new nominations for the pure, clean or eligible candidates to contest the seats. So as it stands they are out – it’s very Clear and straight forward nothing should be entertained even using the two words ( nullification and disqualification as meaning being the same or not, NO please ) don’t contaminate the water- NO ! NO
      (2.) Article (70),(2) a person is disqualified from being elected as a member of parliament if that person,
      (H) has in the immediate proceeding five years, been removed from public office on grounds of misconduct or, (72), (2), (c) a member of parliament shall except the speaker and the deputy speaker, vacate the seat in the national assembly upon dissolution of parliament – (2) the office of a member of parliament becomes vacant if the member – (c) acts contrally to a described code of conduct.
      Now the question to ask here is,

      (1) is there a vacancy or vacancies in Kabushi and kwacha constituencies ? Yes
      Why are there vacancies? Because the MPS have vacated offices? Why have they vacated offices ? Because their elections were marred with electoral malpractices, violence and corrupt practices. Are these acts prescribed in the electoral code of conduct? Yes. Then they are bad people not fit to be called honourables. and are as such disqualified automatically.
      Article (72), (4) a person who causes a vacancy in the national assembly due to reasons specified under (2), (a), (b), (c), (d),(g) and (H) shall not during that term of that parliament –
      (A) be eligible to contest; or (b) hold public office.
      Then the question here is, is the office of a member of parliament a ppublic office? Yes . Are these by- election which erew caused by Lusambo and Malanji in the same term of five years? YES. the het constitution categorically refuses them to contest since there was malpractices involved and cannot re-contest again. these two gentlemen are not eligible to contest these seats. Period.
      PLEASE LETS DO THE RIGHT THING IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN THE CREDIBILITY OF THE CONSTITUTION OTHERWISE, I AM AFRAID.

      Reply

  10. So to this Nawakwi woman the constitution is madness? Ba Nawakwi take it easy. Like Salome in the holy Bible, you wanted to exchange the head of HH for the position of PF vice president. Madam you’re callous and evil to the core. May your diabolical schemes return to you ten times.

  11. Madam legan sausage nawaki siwilanji Edith and condom failed to make national budget during her time.The country it is not mad we have not seen the country picking plastics from dustbin,I think nawaki is the one who is mad because was not cleansed.

  12. HOW YOU WANT TO PENESHA ICHALO BUT YOU WILL END-UP [ UKUPENA WEMWINE ] INTANNGLED IN IT.

    ( the resources are very scarce hence every one in this country, especially those serving in public offices in our country should Always work hardhato to minimise unnecessary expenditures, westages and put control measures in place – the case of bye-elections in Kabushi and Kwacha Constituencies, why did the courts nullify these seats if they knew and know that the same MPS who were there will stand again, why didn’t you MAINTAIN them ? Why? I don’t understand this. Otherwise, entattaining such cases just to allow the two who caused the bye- election is what can be termed as ” ICHALO NACHIPENA, IF AT ALL ICHALO CHILAPENA MADAM NAWAKWI”. Otherwise this is delela like MALEMA will call it.
    NOW,
    Even when this case is presided on, on Monday, I had time to read through some clauses in the Zambian 2016 amended constitution and this have to be explained to some of us if not all;
    (1).article 52, (6) where a candidate dies, resigns or becomes disqualified in accordance with article 70,100 or 153 or a court disqualifies a candidate for corruption or malpractice, after the close of nomination and before the election date, the electoral commission shall cancel the election and require the filing of fresh nomination by eligible candidates and elections shall be held within 30 days of the filing of the fresh nomination. Now the question here is, and that I ask as a Zambian with the rights to vote, was there malpractice or corruption involved in the nullification of the Kabushi and kwacha constituencies elections?/ these two seats? If the answer is yes, then the two who were MPS by then do not qualify to re-contest because of these practices that led to the nullification of the seats. But if or in the event that the ECZ had allowed them to submit and accept their nomination papers then the above clause, article (52), (6) could have been applied / happened and nominations could have been cancelled and new nominations and elections date set because of the two who would have been or were involved in malpractice including corruption hence becoming in-eligible or disqualified and prompt new nominations for the pure, clean or eligible candidates to contest the seats. So as it stands they are out – it’s very Clear and straight forward nothing should be entertained even using the two words ( nullification and disqualification as meaning being the same or not, NO please ) don’t contaminate the water- NO ! NO
    (2.) Article (70),(2) a person is disqualified from being elected as a member of parliament if that person,
    (H) has in the immediate proceeding five years, been removed from public office on grounds of misconduct or, (72), (2), (c) a member of parliament shall except the speaker and the deputy speaker, vacate the seat in the national assembly upon dissolution of parliament – (2) the office of a member of parliament becomes vacant if the member – (c) acts contrally to a described code of conduct.
    Now the question to ask here is,

    (1) is there a vacancy or vacancies in Kabushi and kwacha constituencies ? Yes
    Why are there vacancies? Because the MPS have vacated offices? Why have they vacated offices ? Because their elections were marred with electoral malpractices, violence and corrupt practices. Are these acts prescribed in the electoral code of conduct? Yes. Then they are bad people not fit to be called honourables. and are as such disqualified automatically.
    Article (72), (4) a person who causes a vacancy in the national assembly due to reasons specified under (2), (a), (b), (c), (d),(g) and (H) shall not during that term of that parliament –
    (A) be eligible to contest; or (b) hold public office.
    Then the question here is, is the office of a member of parliament a public office? Yes . Are these by- election which was caused by Lusambo and Malanji in the same term of five years? YES. then the constitution categorically refuses them to contest since there was malpractices involved and cannot re-contest again. these two gentlemen are not eligible to contest these seats. Period.
    PLEASE LETS DO THE RIGHT THING IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN THE CREDIBILITY OF THE CONSTITUTION OTHERWISE, I AM AFRAID.

    • Spot on , and as clear as day light. Why the confussion and mega show we are experiencing over this easy case nobody knows. It is suprisingly as if the same institutions that confirmed the illegal acts are also trying hard to justfy the same wrong identified and ruled on. Very confussing. But you are on the right track with your very logical argument. It actually makes sense.

      This thought pattern is better than the alternative , which is to forget about the crimes committed and concentrate on nullification and disqualification. We are waiting for a sentence on the one found with a case to answer. Simple. Unless they were found without a case to answer. Which is why we are where we are today, with a by election becuase the two people were guilty of crimes as confirmed by the courts of law. So see why this makes no sense at all. At least to most thinking people you however are spot on!!

  13. Exactly what should be the concern of every sane Zambian. Those who are mad did not see why the elections were nullified and because they are mad, they want the same idiots who were found wanting to stand again. Is that not madness? Why then should that madness of ifine fyafisushi be attributed to normal Zambians who want to see things done according to the law which was made by the same mad people? If Lusambo and Malanji were clean, why were the elections nullified?

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here