Home Politics PeP Hon. Munir Zulu refusal to consume the soup probably saved his life-...

Hon. Munir Zulu refusal to consume the soup probably saved his life- Sean Tembo

12

THE PARLIAMENT MOTEL SAGA

By Sean Tembo – PeP President

1. A lot of people have commented on the issue of Lumezi Member of Parliament; Honorable Munir Zulu and what transpired at Parliament Motel a few days ago. According to the story narrated by Hon. Zulu himself, he says he went to Parliament Motel and ordered a bow of soup. However, his order took longer than usual to be processed, to the extent that patrons who came after him and ordered main meals, had their orders served while he continued waiting for his bow of soup. This, according to Hon. Zulu, made him suspicious as to what was delaying the processing of his order. When the order finally came, Hon. Munir Zulu asked the waiter to taste the soup, and the waiter refused to do so. Hon. Zulu then decided to pay for his order but did not consume it as he was not sure if the soup was safe to consume.

2. However, after narrating his story, Hon. Munir Zulu received a lot of backlash from various Government officials, including some Parliament Motel staff who vowed never to serve him again. So the question that needs to be addressed here is whether there is anything wrong with Hon. Zulu’s narration of events which deserves condemnation?

3. The first issue to determine is whether the story narrated by Hon. Munir Zulu is accurate or was it exaggerated in any way, shape or form? Well, the National Assembly actually formally responded to the story narrated by Hon. Zulu, through it’s Senior Media Liaison Officer, a Mr. Nshamba Muzungu. As a matter of fact, the National Assembly in it’s response did not dispute the story in any way. They only condemned Hon. Zulu for making the story public, as according to their statement; “it could tarnish both the motel and the National Assembly itself”. So, for all intents and purposes, the story narrated by Hon. Munir Zulu is accurate, because if it wasn’t, the National Assembly would have disputed it, or at least aspects of it.

4. The second question to determine is whether Hon. Munir Zulu was in order to publish this story of possible poisoning by the National Assembly Motel? Or should he have just kept quiet about the issue? Well, there is a document in this country that we call the Constitution. And in that document, there is a portion that is referred to as the Bill of Rights which gives every citizen of this nation the freedom, right and liberty to express themselves. Therefore, if Hon. Munir Zulu had decided to keep quiet about the issue, that would have been within his rights. Equally, the decision to publicize his suspected poisoning at the National Assembly Motel is very much within his rights as a bonafide citizen of this Republic. No one has a right to tell him to keep quiet. Especially given the fact that no one is disputing the accuracy of his story.

5. The third issue to determine is whether the facts of the circumstances that transpired at the National Assembly Motel provided a reasonable basis for Hon. Munir Zulu to suspect that the soup which he ordered might have been poisoned? Well, any politician would be suspicious if their food took longer than expected after placing an order. Such suspicion would be more than doubled if the waiter serving the food refused to taste it. Why would anyone refuse to taste the food which they have prepared if there is nothing wrong with it? If the waiter in question was uncomfortable tasting the food, why didn’t his supervisor taste it? Or if the supervisor was equally uncomfortable tasting the soup, why didn’t the chef who prepared it taste it? If there is any reputation damage that occurred to the National Assembly Motel by this event, it was occasioned by their own poor handling of this event and not Hon. Munir Zulu.

6. The fourth issue to determine is whether Hon. Munir Zulu acted in any untoward manner during this entire event? The immediate answer to this question is a definite no. The Honorable Member of Parliament even had the courtesy to pay for the soup, despite the fact that he was unable to consume it. If it was me, l doubt that l would be that diplomatic. I mean, the fact that the person who has prepared the food refused to taste it basically renders the food unconsumable, so why should l pay for it? Unless of course l feel charitable on that particular day. So instead of condemning Hon. Munir Zulu, the National Assembly should be applauding him for having behaved in such a gentlemanly way, and should instead chastise their Motel staff for poorly handling the matter. That is assuming that the soup was not in fact poisoned.

7. The last question to determine is whether the National Assembly Motel is in fact capable of poisoning food that is served to a guest? Well, to answer that question, allow me to take you back 11 years ago, to an incident that happened on 12th July 2013 at the National Assembly Motel. On that day, according to a narration of events by the then Solwezi Central MMD Member of Parliament, Hon. Lucky Mulusa, him and his colleagues sitting at the National Assembly Motel bar when a waiter brought him three shots of whiskey which he had not ordered. The MP became suspicious and refused to drink the whiskey. But it did not end there. Him and his colleagues decided to take the whiskey in question for a laboratory analysis. And behold, they results found a high concentration of a poison called Clonazepam. The MP further narrated that he was advised by physicians that had he consumed the whiskey in question, it would have collapsed his liver and also led to a breakdown of the nervous system and subsequent death.

8. In retrospect, it would have been nice if Hon. Munir Zulu had taken the route that Hon. Lucky Mulusa took 11 years ago, by subjecting the suspected laced soup to a laboratory analysis. Then we would have known for sure whether the soup in question was laced with poison or not. Whatever the case, the National Assembly and Government in general should immediately cease and desist from attacking Hon. Munir Zulu regarding the National Assembly Motel saga. The MP’s actions were gentlemanly and above board. His refusal to consume the soup probably saved his life. Anyway, the Future is SET ✌️✌️✌️

///END

SET 22.08.2024

12 COMMENTS

  1. Sir.a simple google search would have shown that Clonazepam is a medication, note a medication NOT a poison, used to treat anxiety, bipolar and other psychological issues.
    Credibility in politics and public statements is important

  2. Why condemn Hon. Munir Zulu for taking precaution on his health and life. The Zambian delegation that went to the just ended Zimbabwe SADC is reported to have been advised by GRZ to take its own food and chefs to prepare the food. So, why should it be wrong for Hon Munir Zulu to take precution when GRZ is able to do the same with its SADC delegation to Zimbabwe?

    • Such acts that vigilance by GRZ officials travelling abroad would lead one to infer an air of familiarity with the act of poisoning and would lend credence to Munir s assertions and paranoia.

  3. Muna Kaliba, you should advise this Munir Zulu to take precaution by taking his own food if he suspects that food prepared by the motel for him will be poisoned. Luckily the Zambian delegation to the just ended Zimbabwe SADC didnot request any Zimbabwean waiter to taste their food before eating the good!!

  4. Indeed SET future is infinity. He will continue supporting Munir Zulu to force a waiter to eat the soup he orders to check if this soup is safe even though the waiter didnot prepare the soup… then he will force the chef to taste the soup .. then the chef says he suspects that it is either the waiter who injected poison as he was taking the food to Zulu or it is the raw materials he was given to prepare the soup which had poison.. an infinity of SET future indeed!!

  5. Brother Tembo, his action didn’t save his life because there was no evidence of poisoning.What may be evident in his submission is the delayment in serving him which is sad.However, he could have taken route 6 if he was really very suspicious and wanted to prove his thought.The bad thing Mr Tembo is we have taken our country backwards by washing dirty linen in public.There are several things that have happened and intergrity of our institutions is slowly coming down.And some people don’t care about that.The parliament motel is visited by many people and people may not feel at home when they visit the facility.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Exit mobile version