SHOCKING TESTIMONY IN BESIGYE TREASON TRIAL: KENYAN CATHOLIC NUNS, SECRET TRAINING AND NAKASONGOLA AIRFIELD MENTIONED IN COURT!
The treason trial of Dr. Kizza Besigye took another dramatic turn after the prosecution’s first witness made explosive allegations before the High Court Criminal Division in Kampala.
Andrew Wilson, also known as Orlando, told court that Catholic religious sisters in Kenya allegedly helped arrange premises where a group of youths were expected to undergo training as part of an alleged plan to overthrow the Ugandan government.
According to the witness, the alleged training was expected to take place at a Pastoral Centre in Kisumu, Kenya.
Wilson claimed that Catholic nuns cleaned the rooms before police arrived at the facility. By the time officers reportedly reached the premises, the rooms had allegedly been cleaned and no belongings connected to those arrested were recovered.
The witness further told court that 36 trainees arrested in Kisumu had been charged with terrorism and were expected to be released after a maximum of six months.
But that was not all. 😳
Wilson also testified about alleged discussions involving Uganda’s Air Force and a possible attack on an airfield, with Nakasongola Airfield allegedly mentioned as a potential target.
He further made allegations concerning discussions about pilots, missiles and alleged contacts within Uganda’s security establishment, mentioning individuals identified as Samuel and Simon, as well as other people allegedly operating in Kenya, Zambia and the Democratic Republic of Congo.
Wilson also told court that Besigye allegedly spoke about cooperating with Catholics in Uganda and referred to an Italian priest he had allegedly worked with for more than 30 years.
⚠️ IMPORTANT: These are allegations made by a prosecution witness in court. Dr. Kizza Besigye and his co-accused have not been convicted of these allegations, and the case remains before the court for determination.
🔥 THIS TRIAL IS GETTING MORE DRAMATIC WITH EVERY WITNESS!
Do you believe the prosecution’s evidence will be enough to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt—or do you think the defence will successfully challenge these allegations?