ON DONATED MONEY BY ALLEGED ZAMBIANS TO NRPUP

ON DONATED MONEY BY ALLEGED ZAMBIANS TO NRPUP.

We are finding it difficult to understand how the money could have been donated by Zambians through banks and mobile money, but then allegedly end up entirely in cash within such a short period.

Here is our opinion as we try to connect the dots anyway.

1. A financier allegedly removes money to fund a militia group. That money is not transacted through the bank or mobile money accounts, but instead a suspected business partner collects the money physically.

2. Once the business partner collects the money, they allegedly leave some form of trail or confirmation to assure the financier that the money has been received for the intended purpose.

3. A plan is then allegedly developed to use Zambians as a decoy. A GoFundMe or similar fundraising campaign is created, encouraging Zambians to donate and creating an impression that the money is coming from ordinary citizens.

4. Within a week, you announce that you have raised K7.1 Million from Zambians, when under this theory, a financier may actually be responsible for a substantial portion or all of the money.

5. The State allegedly notices suspicious movements and places the people involved under surveillance. Two days later, security officers allegedly move in the offices and find a substantial amount of money in physical cash.

This would immediately raise a very simple question:

If Zambians donated through banks and mobile money, how did K7.1 Million suddenly become physical cash?

6. The State allegedly confiscates the money and asks those involved to explain how they managed to withdraw K7.1 Million within two days, particularly if the withdrawals happened over a weekend.

7. You fail to provide a satisfactory explanation to the relevant authorities. Now, because you know that questions are being raised about the money, you go to the media first and announce that the State has grabbed money that was allegedly meant for polling agents across the country.

8. Under this theory, your business partner and others quickly meet again with the alleged financier, who releases more money for the agreed operation.

But this time, the money allegedly comes at a critical moment while people are voting and votes are being counted.

9. You quickly sense defeat and allegedly assemble your team to implement the original plan.

Before you manage to collect all the alleged G20s, you declare yourself the winner, allegedly unaware that State security may already have surveillance on the movements of your team.

10. Security officers allegedly storm the area and find you with a group of people, including alleged foreigners and former military personnel, alongside high-grade military weapons.

Your security allegedly reacts by firing gunshots at State security officers creating an immediate threat.

An exchange of fire allegedly follows, during which one or two people are injured.

11. Under this theory, former military personnel manage to escape because of their military skill, experience and training.

Those without similar skills are allegedly arrested.

12. Immediately after hearing that the alleged plan has been exposed, your business partner who was collecting money allegedly attempts to leave the country.

He allegedly tries to use an immigration officer to facilitate his departure around 01:00 hours.

The officer allegedly attempting to assist him is then caught.

13. As leaders, you allegedly sense that the situation has become dangerous because evidence may have been collected linking you to the wider operation of a militia group.

You realise that, if the evidence establishes an organised attempt to overthrow the government by force, serious charges including treason could potentially follow.

You therefore quickly approach an Agency seeking protection.

DOES THIS MAKE A BIT OF SENSE?

If the K7.1 Million was genuinely donated by Zambians, the money should be in the bank now.

This is an opinion that does not suggest those people involved are guilty!

– Zambian Watch News.