LAURA MITI DENIED ENTRY IN ETHIOPIA

Civil Society activist Laura Miti has been denied entry into Ethiopia over her failure to produce a valid visa payment.

Miti had travelled to Ethiopia on Sunday to attend a human commission rights conference.

However airport authorities at Bole International demanded for proof that she had paid for the visa.

Miti produced a receipt for online payment which could not be authenticated.

She spent a night at the airport and when the matter could not be resolved in the morning, she chose to return to Zambia than pay another $75.

Below is her story posted on her Facebook Page.

Mvelankoni travel drama, the kind a hacker would tell.

Arrived in Ethiopia, this evening, for a Human Rights Commission workshop.

Their immigration has refused to accept the receipt for the visa payment I made online.

First, they say I must pay again. Was not happy with that because I am broke.

Anyway, turns out paying would not help because they asked for a letter from their Immigration endorsing the invitation. The letter must be in their language.

I don’t have that letter. They  say – you will sleep here. Not a care. I guess it’s something they do often to people.

Elo, I had said that the Ethiopian visa was best paid for on arrival, because online did not work for me last time. The organisers, however, insisted to the HRC Secretariat that participants pay online.

They promised they would be at the airport to ensure smooth entry
Well, all their phones are off.

So here’s me – pa chair nakatenge for the night.

Ungayewe natuma lodge tuja twaku rural Zambia, twamene nimanene.

Not following up on the visa thing. Nilinakwatu. The way I appreciated my bed while trying to get some kind of comfortable on a chair last night! Nati mwandi I have stopped taking you for granted.

Queued up for change of ticket as soon as Ethiopian Airways opened their desk. They wanted me to pay a penalty to change my ticket to today.

Then, when they consulted their manager, he happened to have lived in Zambia, Ndola, for 4 years.

He said- to me  Zambians are nice people – then instructed the lady to find me a seat at no cost.

Mwaona ka – our goodness is not wasted.

RFM

McPherson Mutale Wrote

PRESIDENT LUNGU MADE THIS BED HE SHOULD BE READY TO LAY IN IT.

“The impending Constitutional Court ruling on December 10, 2024, regarding the eligibility of former President Edgar Chagwa Lungu has ignited a deeply polarized and highly charged national debate. The emotive and divisive discourse surrounding this matter underscores the fragile state of Zambia’s democracy and the inherent risks of judicial politicization.

Both proponents and opponents of Mr. Lungu’s potential candidacy have entrenched themselves in hardline positions, invoking prior Constitutional Court decisions, such as the Dan Pule, Bampi Kapalasa, and Legal Resources Foundation cases, to bolster their arguments. However, these debates often miss the larger picture: the perilous precedent of subordinating the judiciary to political machinations.

Zambia’s judiciary, purportedly an independent arbiter of justice, has long been shackled by the overbearing influence of the executive. Judges are appointed by the president and ratified by a parliament often dominated by the ruling party, creating an inherent conflict of interest. This structural flaw undermines the judiciary’s capacity to serve as an impartial guardian of constitutionalism. The Dan Pule case (2018), which interpreted the contentious issue of term limits, is a glaring example of this subjugation.

The court ruled in favor of Mr. Lungu, declaring that his first term from 2015 to 2016, following the death of President Michael Sata, did not constitute a full term. While legally defensible within the narrow confines of the Constitution, this decision was politically expedient, paving the way for Mr. Lungu to contest in 2021.

Critics, including State Counsel John Sangwa, vehemently opposed this ruling, warning of its long-term ramifications. Sangwa argued that allowing Mr. Lungu to contest again would create a constitutional crisis, eroding public trust in the judiciary.

His prediction has now come to pass. Ironically, Sangwa’s current stance—calling for consistency from the court despite his earlier opposition—seem like a contradiction but it is not. Both parties to this debate now want Sangwa to say what they want to hear. This reflects the toxic politicization of legal discourse, where principles are sacrificed at the altar of political expediency.

The judiciary’s complicity in perpetuating this crisis cannot be overstated. By bending to executive pressure, the Constitutional Court effectively prioritized the political survival of an individual over the stability of the state. The court’s decision in the Dan Pule case was not a triumph of jurisprudence but a capitulation to political will.

Today, as the same court grapples with the question of Mr. Lungu’s eligibility, it finds itself ensnared in the very crisis it helped create. Any attempt to overturn or reinterpret its earlier rulings risks further eroding public confidence in the judiciary and inflaming political tensions.

The implications of this case extend far beyond Mr. Lungu’s political aspirations. They strike at the heart of Zambia’s constitutional democracy. The judiciary’s independence is the cornerstone of any democracy, and its erosion threatens the rule of law.

The UPND government, despite its rhetoric of reform, has shown similar tendencies to politicize the judiciary. This cycle of judicial capture—where each successive administration installs its loyalists—undermines the very foundation of democratic governance.

Mr. Lungu’s supporters argue that denying him the right to contest would violate his constitutional rights. This argument, while superficially appealing, ignores the broader context. The presidency is not a personal entitlement but a public trust.

The notion that Zambia’s stability hinges on one individual’s political ambitions is both dangerous and deeply flawed. Moreover, the threats of unrest from Mr. Lungu’s camp if he is barred from contesting are a direct challenge to the rule of law. Such rhetoric sets a dangerous precedent where political blackmail supersedes constitutionalism.

The judiciary must rise above these pressures and prioritize the nation’s long-term stability over short-term political considerations. Correcting the mistakes of the past will undoubtedly be painful, but delaying this reckoning will only compound the damage. The court’s primary allegiance should be to the Constitution and the Zambian people, not to the political elites who wield temporary power.

Mr. Lungu’s presidency was marked by significant controversy, from the brutal suppression of dissent to widespread allegations of corruption. His tenure exemplified the dangers of concentrating power in the executive.

The failed attempt to amend the Constitution through Bill 10, which sought to entrench presidential authority, was a stark reminder of the risks of unchecked power. Zambia cannot afford to return to this era of democratic backsliding.

If Mr. Lungu genuinely cares about Zambia’s future, he should step aside and allow new leaders to emerge. His insistence on returning to power not only deepens political divisions but also distracts from the urgent task of addressing the nation’s pressing challenges, including economic recovery and social cohesion.

Leadership is not about clinging to power; it is about fostering a legacy that transcends personal ambition. Mr. Lungu has an opportunity to play a constructive role as a mentor and advisor, guiding the next generation of leaders.

The December 10 ruling is not merely a legal determination; it is a litmus test for Zambia’s democracy. The judiciary must seize this moment to reaffirm its independence and restore public confidence.

The stakes are too high for business as usual. This is a time for courage, for justice, and for putting the nation’s interests above all else. Zambia deserves better than the perpetual cycle of political manipulation and judicial complicity. It is time to break free.”

WILL THE  2021 ELECTION BE CANCELLED?

As the date for the landmark judgement on Tuesday, 10th December 2024 approaches, the debate is heating up.

There are legal views being advanced by those on the side of former president Edgar Lungu whose eligibility will be decided for elections in 2021 and future elections, that if the Constitutional ruled against him then the 2021 elections will be cancelled.

However Trywell Mudryk Phiri Snr has a different view:

Nathan Banda CONFRONTING THE NARRATIVE THAT THE 2021 ELECTION RESULTS WILL BE CANCELLED IF ECL IS DECLARED NOT ELIGIBLE.
_________________________________________________
As we await the landmark judgment by the Constitutional Court on the eligibility of former President Edgar Lungu, it is clear that the upcoming judgment has ignited intense debate among our citizens. Some suggest that a ruling of ineligibility for the former President would automatically nullify the 2021 presidential election results.

The false narrative circulating about the ECL eligibility judgment suggests that if former President Edgar Lungu is declared ineligible, the 2021 presidential election results would be nullified, and power would be handed back to him. This narrative claims that fresh elections would be called within 90 days, potentially plunging the country into uncertainty and instability.

However, this narrative is misleading. Zambia’s electoral laws and constitutional framework, and the natural laws of justice do not seem to support such a drastic outcome.

A football analogy would better illustrate this point.  Whenever a team uses an ineligible player, it is only  the offending team that faces sanctions, such as forfeiting the match or being disqualified. The innocent team isn’t punished or made to go back and play the same match in which their opponent used an ineligible player.

I can cite some Real-life examples to support this perspective:

Kenyan Football Federation Ban

In 2018, the Kenyan football federation was banned from international competitions for two years after using an ineligible player.

JS Kabylie Disqualification:

In 2020, JS Kabylie was disqualified from the CAF Champions League for fielding an ineligible player.

Zambia National Team Benefit:

In 2011, Zambia benefited from a similar situation when the Football Association of Zambia successfully protested against Nigeria’s use of an ineligible player.

In each case, the offending parties faced consequences, while innocent parties benefited from the correct application of rules.

In fact, it appears that in the event that the courts declare the former President ineligible, the only reason why the Patriotic Front may not be punished by being sanctioned from participating in the next election or by docking of the massive 1.8 Million votes which they received in the last election is purely on the basis that the real gate keepers in this matter remain the courts themselves, and the Electoral Commision of Zambia who declared the candidate as eligible. This proves that only the courts can make a determination over such an important matter

As we await the Constitutional Court’s judgment, therefore, it is important to remember that justice can not reward the offender and at the same time, punish, the innocent party.

It must be made very clear that the only two outcomes likely to come out of this Judgement are either :

A. The Constitutional Court will uphold its earlier Position and therefore rule that Former President Edgar Chagwa Lungu was eligible to run for Office in 2021 based on the fact that his first term in office did not constitute a full term, and also declare him so for the election in 2026, or:

B. They may depart from their earlier position and stand on other relevant provisions of the law that deal directly with eligibility for Presidential Office and declare that he was not eligible to run for office then, and that he is not eligible to run for office in 2026, having served and held office twice already.

There will be NO cancelation of the 2021 election results, there will be NO fresh elections to be called within 90 days, and there will be NO handover of power back to ECL in either of these two outcomes. This is a narrative crafted by propagandists whose aim is to create anxiety and possible anarchy in the nation if the courts decide to rule against their preferred outcome.

The judgment is scheduled to be delivered on December 10, 2024, and will be broadcast live on ZNBC and other independent broadcasters. I would like to urge all Zambians to wait patiently for the competent courts to make their determination, and to respect the Court Judgement regardless of whether they choose to uphold their earlier position or to depart from it. That is what the rule of law entails.

I thank you.

Nathan Banda CONFRONTING THE NARRATIVE THAT THE 2021 ELECTION RESULTS WILL BE CANCELLED IF ECL IS DECLARED NOT ELIGIBLE.
_________________________________________________
As we await the landmark judgment by the Constitutional Court on the eligibility of former President Edgar Lungu, it is clear that the upcoming judgment has ignited intense debate among our citizens. Some suggest that a ruling of ineligibility for the former President would automatically nullify the 2021 presidential election results.

The false narrative circulating about the ECL eligibility judgment suggests that if former President Edgar Lungu is declared ineligible, the 2021 presidential election results would be nullified, and power would be handed back to him. This narrative claims that fresh elections would be called within 90 days, potentially plunging the country into uncertainty and instability.

However, this narrative is misleading. Zambia’s electoral laws and constitutional framework, and the natural laws of justice do not seem to support such a drastic outcome.

A football analogy would better illustrate this point.  Whenever a team uses an ineligible player, it is only  the offending team that faces sanctions, such as forfeiting the match or being disqualified. The innocent team isn’t punished or made to go back and play the same match in which their opponent used an ineligible player.

I can cite some Real-life examples to support this perspective:

Kenyan Football Federation Ban

In 2018, the Kenyan football federation was banned from international competitions for two years after using an ineligible player.

JS Kabylie Disqualification:

In 2020, JS Kabylie was disqualified from the CAF Champions League for fielding an ineligible player.

Zambia National Team Benefit:

In 2011, Zambia benefited from a similar situation when the Football Association of Zambia successfully protested against Nigeria’s use of an ineligible player.

In each case, the offending parties faced consequences, while innocent parties benefited from the correct application of rules.

In fact, it appears that in the event that the courts declare the former President ineligible, the only reason why the Patriotic Front may not be punished by being sanctioned from participating in the next election or by docking of the massive 1.8 Million votes which they received in the last election is purely on the basis that the real gate keepers in this matter remain the courts themselves, and the Electoral Commision of Zambia who declared the candidate as eligible. This proves that only the courts can make a determination over such an important matter

As we await the Constitutional Court’s judgment, therefore, it is important to remember that justice can not reward the offender and at the same time, punish, the innocent party.

It must be made very clear that the only two outcomes likely to come out of this Judgement are either :

A. The Constitutional Court will uphold its earlier Position and therefore rule that Former President Edgar Chagwa Lungu was eligible to run for Office in 2021 based on the fact that his first term in office did not constitute a full term, and also declare him so for the election in 2026, or:

B. They may depart from their earlier position and stand on other relevant provisions of the law that deal directly with eligibility for Presidential Office and declare that he was not eligible to run for office then, and that he is not eligible to run for office in 2026, having served and held office twice already.

There will be NO cancelation of the 2021 election results, there will be NO fresh elections to be called within 90 days, and there will be NO handover of power back to ECL in either of these two outcomes. This is a narrative crafted by propagandists whose aim is to create anxiety and possible anarchy in the nation if the courts decide to rule against their preferred outcome.

The judgment is scheduled to be delivered on December 10, 2024, and will be broadcast live on ZNBC and other independent broadcasters. I would like to urge all Zambians to wait patiently for the competent courts to make their determination, and to respect the Court Judgement regardless of whether they choose to uphold their earlier position or to depart from it. That is what the rule of law entails.

I thank you.

CAN A CONSTITUTIONAL  OR SUPREME COURT REVIEW ITS OWN JUDGMENTS?

The powers of the Supreme Court to review its own judgements may be expressly elaborated in a Constitution of a country. This of course has to be read with the provisions of any law made by Parliament or any rule made under the supreme law of the land. In the absence of express provisions, the Court may still have implied powers.

To be sure, review is not rehearing of the appeal all over again. Reviewing of a judgment is done by the Supreme Court only when some serious injustice could be seen in the judgment after it has been passed. The power of review can be exercised for correction of a mistake and not to substitute a view. However, the injustice should be really apparent and shouldn’t have contradictory opinions. The reason is in itself that if there could be two viewpoints in a case, the mistake is not that glaring or serious. Such a situation is not absolute or really obvious. So there wouldn’t naturally be a ground for “review”. The normal rule is that the judgment by the Supreme Court is final. A departure from the principle can be justified only when circumstances of a substantial and compelling character makes it necessary to do so.

Review v Appeal: Scope of the Power

The power of review is distinct from the Court’s power to hear appeals, i.e. the appellate jurisdiction. When hearing a review petition filed against its own order or judgment, the Court does not rehear the case at hand, as it would in an appeal. The purpose of a review petition is limited to remedying an apparent error or the resultant grave injustice that has been the consequence of a decision of the Supreme Court. The Court is thus restricted in the exercise of the power of review to cases where there is an error apparent on the face of the record.

In Northern India Caterers (India) v Lt. Governor Of Delhi (1979) wherein the Court held that “a party is not entitled to seek a review  of a judgment delivered  by this Court merely for the purpose of a rehearing and a fresh decision in the case. Normally the  principle is that a judgment pronounced by the Court  is final  and departure  from  that  principle  is justified only when  circumstances  of  a  substantial  and compelling character  make it  necessary to  do so.  If  the attention of  the Court is not drawn to a material statutory provision during  the original hearing the Court will review its judgment.  The Court  may also  reopen its judgment if a manifest wrong has been done and it is necessary to pass an order to do full and effective justice.”

The power to review its own decisions is not an inherent power of the Supreme Court, but a protective measure against the fallibility of the apex institution of the judiciary so as to ensure the delivery of justice. It must therefore be exercised in a limited manner.

Instances of Reviews in the Commonwealth Jurisdictions

In Subhash Kashinath Mahajan v The State of Maharashtra, a two Judge Bench decided to do away with the bar on grant of anticipatory bails in cases of atrocities and further laid down guidelines for the purpose of making arrests under the Act. In view of the resultant public outcry, the concerned parties approached the Supreme Court seeking review of its decision in Subhash Kashinath Mahajan. The review petition was heard and admitted by the Court and is currently pending.

Conclusion

The Supreme Court has power to disapprove its own decisions where: too rigid adherence to precedent may lead to injustice in a particular case and also unduly restrict the proper development of the law (see 1 WLR 1234, 1966). The default rule, however, favours the status quo. The court will be “very circumspect” before accepting an invitation to review.

A case is only authority for what it actually decides: Lord Halsbury in LC Quinn v Leathem [1901] UKHL 2. A case is not authority for corollaries which may seem apparent or logical.

My personal note: the quality of debates on national matters in our nation is pathetically below par. Misinformation can cause unnecessary mayhem. It’s better not to comment when you are not an authority on national issues at hand. Giving examples on football teams in an attempt to explain or give opinions on serious matters of law shows the low calibre of leadership on both sides of the divide. There are more serious and urgent issues that we must be concentrating on now as a nation – electricity crisis, high cost of living, unemployment, etc. We cannot reduce the debate and the future of our nation to a few selfish individuals. Our nation needs  authentic saviours to reclaim our lost glory.

Saviour Chishimba
UPP President

HON. ROBERT CHABINGA WINS PRESTIGIOUS AWARD

United Kingdom, 8th December 2024.  Zambian opposition leader Robert Chabinga has been recognized as the Distinctive Visionary Leader of the Year at the Global Leadership Forum. This prestigious award is a testament to Chabinga’s outstanding leadership and vision for Zambia’s digital transformation.

In his remarks, Chabinga emphasized the importance of balancing digital advancements in developing economies. He highlighted Zambia’s National Digital Transformation Strategy (2023-2027), which aims to create a digital economy by integrating digital technologies across all industries.

Chabinga also acknowledged the progress Zambia has made in improving its digital infrastructure, including broadband coverage, communication towers, and data centers. He noted that digital financial services and platforms have also grown significantly in the country.

As the opposition leader, Chabinga stressed the need to address gaps in digital access and provide digital literacy programs to equip citizens with the necessary skills. He also called for government subsidies and incentives to reduce the cost of digital devices and internet services for low-income households.

Chabinga concluded by emphasizing the need for developing nations to receive financial support from industrialized nations to establish digital infrastructure and keep up with rapidly advancing artificial intelligence technology.

Robert Chabinga is a Zambian politician who has been serving as the Leader of the Opposition since November 2023. He is also the acting president of the Patriotic Front (PF) party and has been a member of parliament for the Mafinga constituency.

Notable figures in
attendance at the Global Leadership Forum, where Zambian opposition leader Robert Chabinga was awarded the Distinctive Visionary Leader of the Year award, included:

– Bell Ribeiro-Addy, Member of Parliament of the United Kingdom, who joined fellow leaders in recognizing Chabinga. – *Ameenah Gurib-Fakim*, Former President of Mauritius, who participated virtually, underscoring the global nature of the event.
– *Dr. Martha Namdjebo-Tilahun*, Chairperson of the United Africa Group, who was also in attendance, highlighting the importance of African leadership in global forums.

Ameenah Gurib-Fakim – Former President of Mauritius (Virtual attendee)  Dr. Martha Namdjebo-Tilahun. – Chairperson of the United Africa Group

These distinguished guests, among others, gathered to acknowledge Chabinga’s achievements and discuss pressing global issues.

Demanding Substance Over Rhetoric: Zambia’s Urgent Need for Sustainable Solutions

By Sunday Chilufya Chanda

As Zambia grapples with a rapidly changing socio-economic landscape, it is clear that the era of political theatrics must give way to an era of pragmatic, issue-based leadership at Presidential, Parliamentary and Local Government levels. Citizens must demand better from politicians, not just slogans and promises, but substance, foresight, and a commitment to sustainable development.

The challenges Zambia faces are immense, but they are not insurmountable. They require leaders with the courage to think beyond election cycles and the humility to listen to the people they serve. As 2026 approaches, it is time for Zambians to raise the bar and insist on leaders who bring more than charisma to the table. We need leaders with a clear plan, measurable goals, and the resolve to confront the root causes of our national challenges.

1. Economic Diversification: From Rhetoric to Reality

For decades, Zambia has spoken of diversifying its economy from copper dependence to agriculture, tourism, and manufacturing. Yet, the reality remains that copper still accounts for over 70% of export earnings. This over-reliance on a single commodity exposes the country to the volatility of global copper prices.

The Solution:

Diversification requires a deliberate, well-funded industrialization strategy. Zambia must create value chains around its natural endowments. For example:

• Agriculture:

Agro-processing centers should be established in rural areas to add value to raw produce. This will create jobs, reduce post-harvest losses, and boost exports.

• Tourism:

Beyond Victoria Falls, Zambia has an untapped treasure trove of natural wonders. The development of tourism infrastructure, especially in rural districts, could make Zambia a prime destination for eco-tourism.

• Manufacturing:

Policies must incentivize local manufacturing. A country that produces its own fertilizers, machinery, and everyday goods is more resilient to external shocks.

2. Youth Unemployment: A Ticking Time Bomb

With over 70% of Zambia’s population under the age of 35, youth unemployment poses a serious threat to social cohesion. Each year, thousands of graduates join the labor market with few formal jobs available. The informal sector is overburdened, and disillusionment among young people is growing.

The Solution:

Youth unemployment requires structural changes in the education system, industrial policy, and entrepreneurial support. Key interventions include:

• Skills Development:

Establish skills training centres in every district, offering practical training in trades such as carpentry, plumbing, mechanics, and modern agriculture.

• Business Support:

Increase access to capital for youth-led startups. Instead of merely handing out loans, support young people with mentorship, incubation hubs, and market access.

• Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs):

Encourage the private sector to play a bigger role in job creation. Policies must be put in place to incentivize companies that hire youth or provide apprenticeships.

3. Rural Development: A Matter of National Urgency

For too long, rural areas have been neglected in Zambia’s development agenda. While urban centers receive most of the infrastructure and investment, the rural heartland, which produces the bulk of the nation’s food remains underdeveloped. Poor roads, inadequate healthcare, and limited access to electricity hinder the potential of rural Zambia.

The Solution:

Rural development should be the new frontier of Zambia’s development agenda. This requires:

• Infrastructure Investment: Feeder roads, bridges, mini-hospitals, and modern markets must be prioritized in rural districts. Improved connectivity will unlock rural economic potential and reduce rural-urban migration.

• Rural Electrification: Providing electricity to rural areas will unlock opportunities for agro-processing, cottage industries, and improved healthcare delivery. Solar energy should play a pivotal role.

• Agricultural Mechanization: Agriculture remains the backbone of Zambia’s economy, but many smallholder farmers still rely on outdated tools. Access to tractors, irrigation equipment, and modern inputs must be prioritized.

4. Debt Sustainability: Break the Cycle of Borrowing

Zambia’s debt burden is a stark reminder of the cost of borrowing without sustainable repayment strategies. Debt restructuring has brought temporary relief, but without fiscal discipline, the country risks falling into another debt trap.

The Solution:

Zambia must chart a path toward debt sustainability. This involves:

• Transparent Borrowing:

All debt agreements must be transparent and subjected to proper parliamentary oversight.

• Fiscal Discipline:

Reduce non-essential spending and curb wasteful expenditures. If funds are borrowed, they should be directed toward projects with clear, measurable returns.

• Revenue Mobilization:

Zambia needs to improve domestic revenue collection by sealing tax leakages and promoting the formalization of informal sector activities.

5. Healthcare Reform: Beyond Clinics, Towards Universal Access

While strides have been made in healthcare infrastructure, many rural communities remain without access to healthcare. Maternal and child mortality rates remain high, and access to specialists and advanced medical services is limited to urban areas.

The Solution:

Healthcare reform must prioritize access, equity, and quality of service. Key interventions include:

• District Hospitals:

Every district should have at least one fully equipped hospital with specialized services. Mini-hospitals can cater to chiefdoms and rural outposts.

• Human Resources:

Increase the number of healthcare workers, especially nurses, midwives, and doctors, in rural areas.

• Affordable Healthcare:

Expand the National Health Insurance Scheme to cover vulnerable groups and reduce out-of-pocket costs for essential health services.

6. Education Reform: Building Minds for the Future

A 21st-century Zambia requires a 21st-century education system. However, many schools lack basic infrastructure such as classrooms, desks, and access to technology. The curriculum is also misaligned with the job market, leaving graduates unprepared for the workforce.

The Solution:

Education reform must address both access and quality. Key areas of focus include:

• Curriculum Reform:

Align education with market demands by including technical and vocational training in secondary education.

• School Infrastructure:

Prioritize the construction of additional classrooms, dormitories, and sanitation facilities, especially in rural areas.

• Technology in Education:

Embrace e-learning and ensure that students in rural areas have access to internet-enabled devices and connectivity.

7. Leadership and Accountability: No More Excuses

Finally, at the heart of all these challenges is the issue of leadership. Zambia’s politics must shift from personality-driven campaigns to issue-based campaigns. Citizens must demand accountability, transparency, and vision from their leaders. Leaders must be judged not by how many rallies they hold, but by how many projects they complete.

The Solution:

To achieve this, citizens must demand more from their elected officials. Key actions include:

• Social Accountability:

Communities should monitor and demand timely updates on projects funded by the Constituency Development Fund (CDF).

• Issue-Based Campaigns:

Citizens should reject politicians who offer slogans without substance. Elections should be won on merit, not on the volume of campaign songs and mudslinging.

• Legislative Reforms:

Strengthen oversight institutions such as the Financial Intelligence Centre (FIC) and Anti-Corruption Commission (ACC) to ensure public resources are not misappropriated.

The Call to Action

Zambians deserve better. While challenges abound, so do opportunities. But to seize these opportunities, citizens must demand issue-based leadership and reject the politics of populism. This is not a call for cynicism; it is a call for action.

The next elections must be a referendum on ideas, not personalities. Leaders must be called to present clear, coherent, and well-researched development plans. Empty promises should be met with firm resistance. Citizens must insist on roadmaps with timelines, targets, and accountability measures.

The path to Zambia’s prosperity is not hidden: it requires courage, discipline, and a collective will to embrace reform. Our challenges are well known. Our solutions are within reach. What remains is for citizens to demand the substance required to transform rhetoric into reality.

About the Author:

Sunday Chilufya Chanda is a Member of Parliament for Kanchibiya Constituency. He is passionate about rural development, youth empowerment, and the transformation of Zambia’s political landscape into a model of visionary and disciplined leadership.

STOCK THEFT TO BE NON BAILABLE WITH 14 YEARS IMPRISONMENT – HICHILEMA

PRESIDENT Hakainde Hichilema has reiterated that government is in the process of amending the law which will lead to stock theft being non bailable.

Meeting with traditional leaders in Siavonga district yesterday, President Hichilema stated that government will not allow people to get off scot free after stealing livestock.

He said his government does not take any type of crime lightly and as such thieves of goats, cattle, fish and other livestock will need to be fished out of society by way of punishing them severely.

“We will not allow theft. Those who steal cows, goats. Those in criminal activities for livestock theft. Those who are married, you men who are married, you will be locked up for 14 years,  no bail, when you come back you find your wife has produced four children from other men,” he said.

“When people steal from individuals, ing’ombe (cattle),  we will arrest them, goats, cattle, pigs chickens, fish. We are amending the law, there will be no bail, because they steal from a widow seven goats, two oxen you have said. There will be no bail, today we arrest them, tomorrow they go and negotiate with the owner outside court.”

The Head of State further advised thieves and would-be offenders to take up any of government’s interventions like cash for work to sustain themselves.

He warned that no one will walk away freely after stealing anything from citizens.

“Those who steal, go and work, there are a lot of various government interventions like cash for work that can work for your advantage. This government does not support stealing from the people of Zambia,” he explained.

He urged traditional leaders to work together with government in ensuring that thieves are brought to book.

“We need to work together, we your children should not rush to you to say I’m being victimised. Don’t take what is not yours. The subjects must not run to you to divide the country on the basis of fighting against corruption, public money is public money, we must be united in those ends. When people steal from the state, we will arrest them. Why should we lobby for people who are stealing as big as 10 million US dollars. Let’s work together,” urged the Head of State.

And Southern province chiefs’ representative Chief Nalubamba of Namwala district of Southern Province expressed happiness over the move government is taking on stock theft.

He called for a more severe punishment for the thieves as that will help deter would be offenders from committing crimes.

Kalemba

SETTLE POLITICAL DIFFERENCES THROUGH DIALOGUE-  MUNDUBILE.

…. not using the justice system to victimize and persecute opponents that have differed politically.

Lusaka, December 7, 2024 (Smart Eagles)

Mporokoso Member of Parliament Honorable Brian Mundubile says political differences must be settled through dialogue and not using the justice system to victimize and persecute opponents that have differed politically.

Hon Mundubile said this after Vising incarcerated Hon Bowman Lusambo, Francis Muchemwa, Shebby Chilekwa and Geoffrey Bwalya Mwamba among others at Mwembeshi Maximum Correctional Center today.

He was in the company of Hon Mulenga Fube Mp, Hon Mutotwe Kafwaya MP and Hon George Chisanga MP.

Hon Mundubile said the incarcerated politicians have been jailed because they differed with the UPND Government on political matters.

He said the cases of Hon Ronald Chitotela and Hon Nickson Chilangwa makes sad reading.

Hon Mundubile has called upon President Hakainde Hichilema to take deep reflection on these matters and view them from Citizens perspectives.

“I think political differences must be settled through dialogue and not using the justice system to victimize people that have differed politically. Our call is that the President should take it upon himself and put on a different lens so that he feels how we feel when we see our friends go there yet we know they do not deserve to be there. We took time to see Bowman Lusambo, Francis Muchemwa and many others.

Let President Hichilema put on the lens of the Zambian people to understand what they think about these incarcerations. When you look at what happened in KAWAMBWA RESULTED Into these convictions makes sad reading, how do the people from kabushi feel. From the beginning, Bowman Lusambo lost a seat out of unfairness and manipulated the system……,” said Hon Mundubile.

And Hon Mundubile has noted that the political landscape has changed completely and has become worse.

He said that while politics must change, there is need to love lead.

“It has never been seen before that MPs out of small misunderstandings may end up in prison like this. There were differences in the past, we never saw a member of parliament losing his seat out of a political misunderstanding as the case may be in Hon chitotela and Hon chilangwa. President Hichilmea, the Zambians expected you to change the dimension of politics.

The case of chitotela, Bowman, Chilangwa, Shabby Chilekwa are coming out of political differences and must be settled through dialogue,” he said.

Meanwhile, Lukashya MP Hon George Chisanga said there is a difference on how the justice system treats members of the UPND and the opposition stressing the need for a better Zambia.

“The men are in high spirit despite being incarcerated and fighting for their innocence, they have encouraged us to continue focusing on their innocence.  We come here at a time even the USA has raised issues of human rights profile in this country.  They have called this government to pay particular attention to ensure that people enjoy their guaranteed rights including what is enshrined in article 18 of the constitution………… We came here to strengthen our colleagues. We know what they are going through. We are hopeful that a brighter day always comes.

… WE have to fight and ensure that all forms of injustice in the country are removed. We are so grateful to the USA, Zambia must be in the spotlight. They must begin to look at

This is a country that was an admired democracy. This is a country where the rule of law reigned supreme but because of the politisation of the institutions of governance, people are now begin to see that there is a difference on how you are treated when in opposition and government…,” he said.

#SmartEagles2024

DON’T PUNISH DRUG PILFERERS IF YOU FAIL TO PUNISH THIEVING MINISTERS, KAFWAYA TELLS HH

…as he expresses shock that AG now reports audit progress to the Executive

November 7th, 2024 (SmartEagles)

LUNTE Member of Parliament Hon Mutotwe Kafwaya has challenged President Hakainde Hichilema to ‘do nothing’ to the people who have allegedly been stealing medicines meant for use in public health institutions.

President Hichilema has been quoted in today’s Zambia Daily Mail newspaper stating that he now knows the selfish individuals who have been profiting from the drugs meant to benefit Zambians.

The President made the statement after receiving the preliminary findings of the forensic audit conducted on the Zambia Medicines and Medical Supplies Agency (ZAMMSA) by the office of the Auditor General covering the period January 2023 to December 2024.

But Hon Kafwaya states that it will be unfair for president Hichilema and his government to mete punishment on the said individuals found wanting when he has failed to act on the cabinet ministers who are under investigation by the Anti Corruption Commission (ACC).

He says president Hichilema must let the said people who have been stealing the medicines to continue working just like he has failed to punish, suspend or even name a single cabinet minister currently under investigation by the ACC.

“Let him do nothing about these people. He should let them continue working because this is what he has done to the ministers who are being investigated by the ACC,” Hon Kafwaya said.

Meanwhile, the former cabinet minister has expressed surprise that the office of the Auditor General is now giving the President preliminary reports.

Hon Kafwaya states that the office of the Auditor General is independent from the Executive arm of government hence the Executive cannot direct the Auditor General.

He explains therefore that if the Auditor General is independent from the Executive, there is no way that his office can be reporting progress on the audit work.

Hon Kafwaya further notes that constitutionally, the Auditor General reports to the President on the same day as he does to the National Assembly of Zambia.

“So to see that the President is now receiving preliminary reports from the Auditor General has shocked me,” he added.  “And this is why I complain about the state of the Auditor General.”

The Lunte lawmaker is of the view that governance in Zambia has become one of the worst because the Executive has deliberately destroyed institutions of governance.

Hon Kafwaya has urged the Zambian People to have a say on what is happening because the country risk being ‘finished completely’ if the status quo continues on the same trajectory.

#SmartEagles2024

MINISTRY OF EDUCATION EMBROILED IN K3.6 MILLION SCANDAL: NAQEZ DEMANDS HEADS TO ROLL

In what has been dubbed one of the most disgraceful financial scandals in recent history, the Ministry of Education has been exposed for squandering K3.6 million on a dubious census software, M.SAT, without proper justification. The revelation has sent shockwaves across Zambia, with calls for immediate accountability intensifying.

The scandal came to light during the Parliamentary Accounts Committee (PAC) hearings, where Ministry officials were left fumbling for answers on how such an enormous amount of taxpayers’ money was funneled into a shadowy deal. The software, M.SAT, remains a mystery to many, with no evidence of its functionality or necessity in the education sector.

The National Action for Quality Education in Zambia (NAQEZ) has since issued a scathing statement, labeling the involved officials as “enemies of the people” and demanding decisive action from President Hakainde Hichilema.

“School grants are critical to running educational activities in the country. To see millions wasted in this manner is an insult to every Zambian child struggling to learn in dilapidated classrooms,” fumed NAQEZ Executive Director Aaron Chansa. “This blatant abuse of authority must not go unpunished. The President must act now.”

Chansa further threw his weight behind PAC’s efforts to recover the stolen funds while urging the Anti-Corruption Commission (ACC) to launch a thorough investigation.

“Citizens are tired of being told to tighten their belts while officials shamelessly loot public funds. This is the time for the ACC to prove its worth,” he added.

As outrage mounts, Zambians are questioning how such a reckless expenditure could have slipped past oversight mechanisms. Social media is ablaze with citizens demanding answers and insisting that heads must roll in the Ministry of Education.

“This isn’t just a scandal—it’s a betrayal of the Zambian people. While children sit on the floor due to lack of desks, officials are busy lining their pockets. Enough is enough!” wrote one enraged commenter.

The Ministry of Education is yet to issue a satisfactory explanation, further fueling public suspicion. Meanwhile, the clock is ticking for President Hichilema to demonstrate his government’s commitment to rooting out corruption—a key promise of his administration.

Failure to act decisively could spell political disaster, as Zambians grow increasingly impatient with corruption scandals that rob the nation of progress and dignity.

KUMWESU DEC 7, 2024