Home Blog Page 636

Polish radio station replaces journalists with AI ‘presenters’

0

A Polish radio station has triggered controversy after dismissing its journalists and relaunching this week with AI-generated “presenters.”

Weeks after letting its journalists go, OFF Radio Krakow relaunched this week, with what it said was “the first experiment in Poland in which journalists … are virtual characters created by AI.”

The station in the southern city of Krakow said its three avatars are designed to reach younger listeners by speaking about cultural, art and social issues including the concerns of LGBTQ+ people.

“Is artificial intelligence more of an opportunity or a threat to media, radio and journalism? We will seek answers to this question,” the station head, Marcin Pulit, wrote in a statement.

The change got nationwide attention after Mateusz Demski, a journalist and film critic who until recently hosted a show on the station, published an open letter Tuesday protesting “the replacement of employees with artificial intelligence.”

“It is a dangerous precedent that hits us all,” he wrote, and argued it could open the way “to a world in which experienced employees associated with the media sector for years and people employed in creative industries will be replaced by machines.”

More than 15,000 signed the petition by Wednesday morning, Demski told The Associated Press. He said he has also gotten calls from hundreds of people, many of them young people who do not want to be the subject of such an experiment.

Demski worked at OFF Radio Krakow from February 2022, carrying out interviews with Ukrainians fleeing war, until August, when he was among about a dozen journalists who were let go. He said the move was especially shocking because the broadcaster is a taxpayer-supported public station.

Pulit insisted that no journalists were fired because of AI but because its listenership “was close to zero.”

Krzysztof Gawkowski, the minister of digital affairs and a deputy prime minister, weighed in on Tuesday, saying he had read Demski’s appeal and that legislation is needed to regulate AI.

“Although I am a fan of AI development, I believe that certain boundaries are being crossed more and more,” he wrote on X. “The widespread use of AI must be done for people, not against them!”

On Tuesday the station broadcast an “interview” conducted by an AI-generated presenter with a voice pretending to be Wisława Szymborska, a Polish poet and winner of the Nobel Prize in Literature who died in 2012.

Michał Rusinek, the president of the Wisława Szymborska Foundation, which oversees the poet’s legacy, told the broadcaster TVN that he agreed to let the station use Szymborska’s name in the broadcast. He said the poet poet had a sense of humor and would have liked it.

I Have Not Defected to the UPND!- Dr Chitalu Chilufya

0

Press Statement: I Have Not Defected to the UPND!

The notion that an opposition MP cannot engage with the President in the line of duty is incorrect. My appeal to ALL is to reset our politics and recalibrate our collective agenda to service delivery and poverty eradication.

Issued By: Dr Chitalu Chilufya

Lusaka, October 24 – On 22nd October, 2024, I was privileged to be invited to the working presidential visit to Mazabuka. As a result of my being part of this presidential entourage, social media has been awash with maliciously misleading articles coldly calculated at tarring my persona in the collective public conscience of Zambians.



Ordinarily, I do not respond to malice, but I’m compelled to issue an official statement to set the record straight and put closure to the matter at hand. For the avoidance of any doubt, those spreading falsehoods must get this right: I HAVE NOT DEFECTED FROM PF TO UPND. This is anchored on my belief that a credible opposition is crucially fundamental to any functional democracy.

I am the bonafide elected Member of Parliament for Mansa Central, under the Patriotic Front party ticket. I intend to serve out my current term in this regard to the best of my ability and consciously  cognisant of the my absolute loyalty to people of Mansa for the privilege they gave me to serve them.

Further, I am privileged to be the Chairman of the Parliamentary Committee on Parastatal Bodies. I swore oath of allegiance to the Republican President, and the constitution of Zambia to serve the people of Zambia, in general, and the Mansa central in particular. I will continue to work with Government to serve the people by providing effective  checks and balances, as we collectively pursue sustainable development, peace and unity.

It is in this regard that I accepted an invitation to accompany the Republican President, in the stated portfolios, to commemorate the Jubilee Celebrations for one of the country’s most thriving local Zambian companies, the Nakambala Sugar Estate, at which many activities were launched, inter alia, the expanded outgrower scheme for sugarcane, to enhance local participation in the growth of the Zambian economy.

For all intents and purporses,  this is the kind of investment we all must support because it does not only fulfil our collective aspirations of sustainable development, but also creates both corporate and individual wealth we all desire. We can only succeed as the nation if we create common wealth. We can only share wealth and not poverty, not acrimony but progressive human fellowship across all facets of development.

Truth be told, the trip was instructive in many different ways and revealed valuable benchmarking innovations the company is embarking on to expand production, while embracing the needs of the community. The trip further served as an opportunity to network with colleagues in the Executive to lobby for specific constituency  programs and share ideas on matters of national development. I must, therefore, appreciate the President for the invitation to be part of his entourage on this important working visit.

Further, I was invited to a community engagement where the President interacted with the local people and was privileged to address the community. I hereby attach my verbatim speech for ALL to see and judge…

“My due respect to His Excellency, the President of the Republic of Zambia. As we celebrate our 60th year of independence, it is important that we reaffirm our commitment to our oneness as a unitary state, and that’s the reason I’m pleased to be part of the presidential entourage, to reaffirm that we are one people, and that we are one nation. Tuli bantu omwe (we are one people)! Atujatane, tubeleke antoomwe tulete lusumpunko mu chisi (let’s work together to develop Zambia). Thank you very much Mr. President for this opportunity to unite all of us and to show that we are one people! “

There is no doubt in my mind this was the right and proper thing for me to do to support the President in supporting the economic developmental agenda. Let us all pursue, not a narrow, but a broad based national agenda that speaks to the best possible interests of our people. In pursuit of this agenda, my  conscious is crystal-clear. I will always pursue efforts that deliver a developmental state that works for all. Let us abandon the machine-politics designed to split rather than unite our people. Let us reject all the senseless and dangerous propagandists who are stealthly embedded in the belly of our body-politic.

At 60, we can be more proud. A Diamond Nation founded on the enduring spirit of One Zambia, One Nation, cannot be narrowed to myopic black-and-white prism of them and us. There  is rendezvous of opportunity in the middle ground available for all us as a collective.

Party colours of green and red, yellow and orange, white and blue…of any shade, mustn’t divide us but offer us an opportunity to compete.

◾The misconception!

Some of my colleagues in the PF party, may have misconstrued the context of the visit, and created the perception in various social and mainstream media, that l have defected to the ruling UPND. I repeat, I have not defected from the PF.
My appeal to ALL is to reset our politics, detoxify the environment, recalibrate our collective agenda to service delivery and poverty eradication. Politics should not be acrimonious. It should be a platform for competition of ideas to serve our people. I do not subscribe to politics of acrimony.

Let’s create a critical mass of leaders and engender a robust, resilient and sustainable path to prosperity for our people by translating our natural resources into wealth. Let’s embrace meritocracy; we have sufficient human capital to drive the agenda if only we agree to work as a team; let’s not frown upon intelligence and hard work.

Politics should not be about perpetual acrimonious discourse. It should be a platform for competition of ideas to serve our people. Further, I want to emphasize this. I do not believe in the shared delusion that politics must create a barrier between “them” and “us”. We are one people. We are not enemies but friends; we must not be enemies; Divergent views we may have but those should never create permanent walls between us; these walls must come down. We need to start talking to each other. Dialogue is fundamentally important in this era of our political season. We will provide checks and balances at any given opportunity.

As we celebrate our 60th year of independence, let us not be rhetorical about unity. Let’s be practical and ensure that we embrace activities that promote unity, including talking to each other and not at each other. Compromise, for instance, is not a dirty word but a way of life that fosters unity and progress. By embracing compromise, we recognize that true strength lies in finding common ground and prioritizing the greater good of all over personal agendas.

For my friends in the Patriotic Front party, we need to settle our internal divisions expeditiously before we permanently disorient our grassroots. l reiterate the importance of a credible opposition to objectively check the Executive for excesses and ensure accountability to the people. We must not cease to meet and talk to each other and work together.

Happy 60th Independence Day!!!

SP CALLS FOR CITIZEN’S ARREST OF UPND-ALIGNED TEACHERS

0

SP CALLS FOR CITIZEN’S ARREST OF UPND-ALIGNED TEACHERS

…who have been imported from across Luapula province “to manipulate the election outcome”

Kawambwa… Thursday, October 24, 2024

The opposition Socialist Party (SP) has called for a citizen’s arrest of UPND-aligned teachers drawn from outside Kawambwa, allegedly hired to tamper with the will of the people as presiding Officers for the Sunday by-election.

SP Vice Secretary for the Elections Committee Pastor Fred Chanda said it was unfortunate that UPND is under pressure in a highly charged election as both Kawambwa MP Nickson Chilangwa and Pambashe MP Ronald Chitotela are in prison.

He stated that the presence of Six (6) ministers and about Eight (8) District Commissioners in Kawambwa was an attempt to tamper with the democratic process.

Pastor Chanda, who obtained a full list of alleged perpetrators from reliable senior UPND members, challenged the following mentioned individuals to come clean and defend themselves against the allegations: Chomba Mable, whose husband is the UPND District Chairperson for Mwansabombwe, AFRICA Mwansa, who is a Headteacher from Mbereshi in Mwansabombwe, and has been at the centre of confusion throughout the by-elections held in Mwansabombwe, with several complaints written to ECZ concerning him, and Julius Chewe, and Albert Mushipi, who are also are teachers in Mwansabombwe.

Others include Tina Chishala, a Headteacher at Kabalenge in Mwansabombwe district, Cindy Lubosi, Harriet Lamba Chola, Blessing Mwantila, Moses Mutale, Shadreck Kang’ombe, Tinner Chishala, Kerity Chilaka, Jimwaya Lusekolo, Norren Kabutu, and Benken Sebente Kwila.

And Regina Chitomubo, who has been imported from Nchelenge district of Luapula province. While Zebron Kamekela from Kawambwa and the Headteacher of Citrus School of Mwansabombwe have been promised a promotion.

“These are known individuals who have been allegedly hired to tamper with the will of the people as presiding Officers for the Sunday by-election. We have previously reported some of them to ECZ as they are compromised but to no avail,” Chanda stated.

“We call on all the friends and comrades of Hon Nickson Chilangwa and Hon Ronald Chitotela to arrest individuals with an agenda to manipulate the outcome of this election. We call on the people of Kawambwa to honour the legacy of our brothers in prison by protecting the vote.”

Pastor Chanda said he would report these unfair practices to the relevant electoral authorities to ensure a fair and transparent election process.

He also urged international oversight bodies and foreign missions accredited to Zambia to take an interest in the management of by-elections ahead of the 2026 general election.

The JCC has gone rogue: why its verdict in the case of the three fired Constitutional Court judges is an act of grave lawlessness- Sishuwa Sishuwa

0

The JCC has gone rogue: why its verdict in the case of the three fired Constitutional Court judges is an act of grave lawlessness

By Sishuwa Sishuwa

I was earlier alerted to the online availability of the report of the Judicial Complaints Commission (JCC) that recommended the recent firing of three judges of Zambia’s Constitutional Court. Whoever made it available has made a commendable decision as the case has wide public interest.

To download and read the report, click here: gofile.io/d/JvBI0N

I have also seen and read the complaint from Moses Kalonde that paved the way for the JCC to recommend the suspension and eventual removal of the three judges.

To download and read the complaint, click here: gofile.io/d/cBclPx

I am grateful to whoever uploaded these documents online. Their decision is an act of courage, one that I suppose they made in public interest. I encourage everyone interested in issues of national interest to read these documents and make up their own mind. I have now read both the complaint from Kalonde and the report of the JCC.

It is the report of the JCC that I find particularly troubling. A careful reading of its conclusions shows that the JCC – itself a creation of the Constitution of Zambia – has elevated itself far above the Constitution and any other constitutional body such as the Constitutional Court, the Judicial Service Commission, and the National Assembly.

Let me illustrate this point with a few direct quotations from the report that reinforce my argument that the JCC has gone rogue, acted outside the confines of the law, and committed illegalities of grave proportion.

Before I proceed to do so, I should pause to cite two provisions of Zambia’s constitution that the JCC relied upon to recommend the removal of the three judges from office. One is Article 141 (1) (b) which provides for the qualifications of Constitutional Court judges: “A person qualifies for appointment as a judge if that person is of proven integrity and has been a legal practitioner, in the case of the Constitutional Court, for at least fifteen years and has specialised training or experience in human rights or constitutional law.”

Another is Article 143 (b) that provides for the grounds on which a judge may be removed from office: “A judge shall be removed from office on the following grounds:
(a) a mental or physical disability that makes the judge incapable of performing judicial functions;
(b) incompetence;
(c) gross misconduct;
or (d) bankruptcy.”

In making its case for removing the three judges on the ground of alleged incompetence, the JCC stated that the three judges did not qualify to be appointed to the office of judge because they lacked specialised training or experience in human rights or constitutional law, and that their nominations were opposed by the Law Association of Zambia (LAZ) for the same reason:

“LAZ [Law Association of Zambia] did not support the appointment of the Respondents [Mugeni Mulenga, Anne Mwewa, and Palan Mulenga] and rightly so. Clearly, none of the three Respondents qualified for appointment to the office of Constitutional Court judge and as such are incompetent to hold office or even exercise the functions thereof.

The conclusion of the Commission therefore is that the three Respondents do not meet the minimum threshold to sit as Judges of the Constitutional Court and are therefore incompetent to preside over any matters filed in that Court. The three Respondents’ incompetence in terms of lack of requisite training and experience brings them under the ambit of Article 143 (b) of the Constitution.

The Commission therefore finds that all three Respondents are not qualified to be Constitutional Court judges as per threshold set out in the Constitution and Isaac Mwanza case cited above. The Commission holds that the Respondents are incompetent to be judges of a specialised court like the Constitutional Court and as such should be removed from office.”

There are several questions that arise from this.

First, where did the JCC – an administrative body set up by the constitution to receive complaints lodged against a judge or judicial officer, hear such complaint, and make recommendations to the appropriate institution or authority for action – get the authority to venture into the area of the appointment of judges?

According to Zambia’s constitution, there are three institutions that have been mandated to deal with the appointment of judges. The first is the Judicial Service Commission (JSC), which itself is constituted by the President.

The JSC initiates the process of appointment by identifying and recommending the names of individuals to serve as possible judges to the President of Zambia. The second is the executive. After the president receives the recommendations from the JSC, and if he or she is satisfied with the said recommendations, they (the president) submit the names of the nominees to the third institution, the National Assembly. The National Assembly, usually after receiving advisory but non-binding submissions from other institutions such as professional bodies and civil society, scrutinises the nominees and recommends the approved ones for confirmation of appointment to the president. Once this process is complete, the nominee becomes a judge. This process played out in 2016 when the three were appointed as judges, and all the three mentioned institutions confirmed that the trio was qualified to be appointed as judges to the Constitutional Court. Even the JCC at the time supported the appointments during the confirmation hearings.

More importantly, there is no provision under the existing law that empowers the JCC to review the decisions of the three institutions that have been mandated to appoint judges. By reviewing the appointment of the three judges and concluding that they were not qualified to serve on the Constitutional Court, the JCC exercised powers not given to it by law and elevated itself far above the JSC, the executive, the National Assembly, and ultimately the constitution of Zambia itself. This is an act of grave and extreme lawlessness since the authority to appoint a judge is vested in the JSC, the president and the National Assembly. If a person alleges non-compliance with the appointment of a judge once the process has been completed, they can challenge the institution (s) that appointed them, but not the individual judge.

Second, where did the JCC get the authority to interpret the Constitution of Zambia or pronounce itself authoritatively and with such finality on constitutional matters? Article 1 (5), which provides for the supremacy of the constitution, states that “A matter relating to this Constitution shall be heard by the Constitutional Court.” More specifically, Article 128 of the constitution states that (1) “Subject to Article 28 [which deals with the Bill of Rights and vests the power to interpret this section in the High Court], the Constitutional Court has original and final jurisdiction to hear a matter relating to the interpretation of this Constitution”. It also provides that any person aggrieved with any act, decision or measure taken under law has the right to petition the Court for redress.

If the JCC felt that the appointment of the three judges contravened the Constitution, or that they needed guidance on the meaning of word ‘incompetence’, they should have stopped proceedings before them and sought clarification from the Constitutional Court. Alternatively, the JCC could have declined hearing the complaint on ground that they do not have the jurisdiction to consider it and advised the complainant to refer the matter to the Constitutional Court – the same way the JCC through its chairperson Vincent Malambo did when former president Edgar Lungu asked the body to discipline three other judges of the same court for alleged breach of the Judicial Code of Conduct. By proceeding to interpret specific provisions of the constitution, the JCC not only demonstrated double standards over related issues but also assigned to itself powers not given to it by law, usurped the authority of the Constitutional Court, and engaged in grave lawlessness.

Third, if the JCC is to be believed that the appointment process that resulted in the confirmation of the three dismissed judges was faulty, why should Zambians believe that the judges being appointed by the same institutions – the JSC, the President, and the National Assembly – are any better since nothing has changed in relation to both the relevant laws and the process of how judges in Zambia are appointed?

To put it more clearly, members of the current Judicial Service Commission were appointed by President Hakainde Hichilema, whose party has a majority in the National Assembly. Why should anyone believe that the four judges that the JSC recommended to Hichilema for appointment to the Constitutional Court last year and whose nomination was ratified by parliament through a simple majority are themselves qualified or competent? In fact, some of these new judges recommended by the JSC, appointed by Hichilema, and ratified by parliament – such as Arnold Shilimi – not only lack specialised trailing in human rights and constitutional law but also has their nomination opposed by LAZ. To download and read LAZ’s opposition to Shilimi’s appointment, click here: parliament.gov.zm/sites/default/…
Yet Shilimi is not only a serving judge; he was promoted by Hichilema to the position of deputy president of the court – a very important post that determines case allocation and the composition of panels that hear cases on the court. And if the lack of specialised training or experience in constitutional or human rights law disqualifies a person from appointment as a judge of the Constitutional Court, then where does this leave judges like Martin Musaluke and Mweetwa Shilimi who both lack specialised training or experience in these fields? Musaluke admitted this drawback during his parliamentary confirmation hearing in 2016 by claiming that he did not appoint himself to the role while Shilimi recognised this deficiency as so significant that he enrolled for a course on constitutional and administrative law at University of Lusaka AFTER his appointment as a Constitutional Court judge in order to address it?

Fourth, if the JCC is to be believed that the three judges have been removed from office for their incompetence, then what happens to all the cases they have handled and decided since 2016? Also, is incompetence proved by lack of formal qualifications or one’s incapacity to do something? If the judges are as incompetent as the JCC would want us to believe, then why is the JCC citing as a credible authority a judgement that was passed by the same individuals whom they say are incompetent? What does all this say about the JCC itself?

All this raises one fundamental question: how are individuals appointed by the President to serve as commissioners on the JCC and JSC identified or selected? What qualifications do Prisca Nyambe, Kephas Katongo and Eva Jhala hold that make them suitable commissioners to serve on the JCC? In some cases, during the hearing, these commissioners easily dismissed the evidence provided by the dismissed judges as “all lies” and believed what their former colleagues who testified against them – Margaret Munalula and Hildah Chibomba – said as the truth? How did the JCC know that it was the retired Chibomba who was not lying?

In another strange conclusion that shows how broken the system is, the three commissioners who sat to hear and determine the case stated in the report that the chairperson of the JCC, Vincent Malambo, engaged in unethical conduct. Now, the role of the JCC is to assess the ethical behaviour of judges. If the chairperson of the very body that has been tasked with enforcing the ethical behaviour of judges is accused of unethical conduct, does he still qualify to continue serving in his role?

But wait. At what point was Malambo heard since this case was about the three judges, not him? How did the three commissioners reach the conclusion that their chairperson is guilty of unethical conduct without affording him the opportunity or right to be heard? Doesn’t this demonstrate a degree of incompetence or unethical conduct on the part of the three commissioners? And if the members of the JCC are themselves incompetent or engaged in unethical behaviour, then where does this leave the JCC?

GBM to remain in jail despite appeal

0

GBM to remain in jail despite appeal

Despite the appeal against his conviction, former Defense Minister Geoffrey Bwalya Mwamba will be extending his stay in jail courtesy of a court decision that keeps him behind bars until his appeal is heard.

https://www.facebook.com/share/p/rzhc3Me5cChrfkq9/?mibextid=oFDknk

This comes after GBM, as he’s popularly known, was slapped with a five-year jail sentence by the Economic and Financial Crimes Court on eight counts of conflict of interest, four counts of possession of property suspected to be proceeds of crime, and a K50,000 fine for money laundering.

Mwamba’s troubles began when he was accused of allowing his companies and relatives to do business with the Ministry of Defense while he was at the helm.

The court ruled that as a public servant, Mwamba owed a fiduciary duty to the public, and his actions were in clear conflict of interest.

GBM has since filed an appeal, citing eight grounds, including claims that the trial court erred in law and fact when convicting him.

Magistrate Stanford Ngobola in denying Mwamba bail said the chances of the appeal succeeding are dim, and that the prospects of success must not be remote but must have a realistic chance of succeeding.

Mwamba had applied for bail pending appeal against his jailing to the Economic and Financial Crimes Court (High Court division).

On October 9, 2024 Mwamba alias GBM was jailed five years by the Economic and Financial Crimes Court on eight counts of conflict of interest, four counts of possession of property suspected to be proceeds of crime, and fined home K50, 000 for money laundering.

Mwamba was facing 24 criminal charges among them; eight counts of conflict of interest, one count of money laundering and 15 counts of possessing property suspected to be proceeds of crime.

GBM has filed eight grounds of appeal on which he wants to challenge his conviction.

He argues that magistrate Ngobola erred in law and fact when he convicted him on eight counts of failure to declare interest contrary to section 28 (2) and (3) of the Anti-Corruption Act No.3 of 2012.

Mwamba said the trial Court erred in law and fact when it failed to attach any evidential weight to his declarations of interest which clearly demonstrated that such interest had been declared and the matter was previously closed after investigation by an earlier Joint Investigation Team in 2013.

During bail hearing Mwamba’s lawyer Bonaventure Mutale said there are exceptional circumstances that the court ought to consider, which arise primary from the convict’s medical condition.

Mutale said Mwamba has a chronic heart condition which has been confirmed by two heart specialists from the National Heart Hospital.

He said without medical attention from the heart experts his heart condition would be at risk and may deteriorate further.

“The record is voluminous and as such there is a likelihood of a delay in the preparation of the record, which may result in the applicant serving a substantial part of his sentence,”said Mutale.

Kelvin Fube Bwalya, submitted that the appeal raises important and difficult points of law that make it a very exceptional case.

He said there is a real doubt about the correctness of the conviction in some of the counts based on law.

Bwalya said without arguing the grounds of appeal, the grounds that have been filed raise important points of law which manifestly demonstrates that the conviction requires a relook especially with the eight counts of deceleration of interest.

But the State argued that the health of a convict is not an exceptional circumstance for them to be admitted to bail pending appeal.

It said GBM is now a convict who does not enjoy the benefits of an innocent person and can only be granted bail pending appeal where exceptional circumstances exist.

The State argued that the grounds of appeal do not disclose any prospects of success for his appeal and that he has not disclosed any exceptional circumstances warranting the exercise of the Court’s discretion to grant him bail pending appeal.

In his ruling magistrate Ngobola said the right to bail pending appeal is not automatic; as Mwamba is supposed to demonstrate that his appeal has overwhelming chances of success and that there are exceptional circumstances which would entitle him to bail pending appeal.

“I have perused the appellant’s grounds of appeal, and while being careful not to delve into the merits and demerits of the grounds of appeal, am not convinced that the appeal raises important and difficult points of law,” he said.

“Evidentially, it does not raise any substantial or weight on a point of law. As regards the submission on the applicant’s medical condition, in my view it is a good ground. However, ill health of the applicant per se is not enough to warrant this court to release him on bail pending appeal.”

Magistrate Ngobola said Mwamba alias GBM must demonstrate prospects of success on appeal.

He said the likelihood of success of the appeal lies in the strength of the grounds of appeal.

“Having perused the intended grounds of appeal, it is clear to me that the prospects of success of the appeal are slim. I am not satisfied that the applicant has made out a persuasive case for bail pending appeal,” said magistrate Ngobola.

“He has not met the legal threshold required for his release on bail pending appeal. Accordingly, the applicant’s application fails and is hereby dismissed.”

By Mwaka Ndawa

Kalemba October 24, 2024.

DAMAGED BEINGS
[The Curious Case of Colonialism and the African]- Dr Canisius BANDA

0

DAMAGED BEINGS
[The Curious Case of Colonialism and the African]
_______

Children should not, cannot fail.
It is adults that fail children.

Granted, some children are born both structurally and functionally challenged.
Defective. Mutants. Imbeciles.

It is a given that treating such handicapped children and the non-defective the same is wrong.
Each child needs appropriate attention and care.

Children are programmable beings.
Explains why the very best of our teachers, professors of art, languages, manners/culture, science, hygiene, and such important things as business and mathematics, should be the ones to teach our children.

Langeni umwaice inshila yakwendelamo, nelyo nga akota, takafumemo.
Now you understand what I am talking about. The Catholics know.

It all started when I was born. But then, truth be told, this crap is really old.
When I was born, that is when the shit began. For me at least.

I was the first, much-anticipated child of Mr Kanyenga Mbeta and Ms Mwayi Wanga, a celebrated child.
So, as an undying memory that brought them together and would keep them together till death ended it all, they had a name for me.
Chikondi. Love.

This is a pagan name, the priest, an alien, said. So if you want your child to be a baptized Catholic, you must change his name.
They were beyond stunned.

What was pagan about Chikondi, love? My parents stared at each other in utter consternation.
These strangers are really strange, tacitly, they agreed.

So as an act of loyalty to the strangers’ god, and out of fear of their god’s wrath and being left out on the trip to heaven, Peter, I became.
After one of their saints, my parents were told.

To this day, there is nothing really saintly about me.
Chikondi would have been just fine a name for my character and heritage. It was a name laden with such meaning.

They found me in the bush, looking after cattle, part of my family’s wealth.
Then they said, frowning upon my way of life, I should stop what I doing and go to school.
I obeyed.

I sat in that school as a dry sponge, ready to take it all in.
And take it all in I did.

Instead of teaching me about the various breeds of cattle that there are, instead of teaching me about how you vaccinate cattle to preserve their health, instead of teaching me about the different varieties of grass that enhance cattle nutrition and health, instead of teaching me about artificial insemination to multiply my animals, instead of teaching me about the many products that come from cattle, shoes, bags, processed meats and all, instead of building upon my extant culture, they did something else to me.
They dislocated me.

They taught me about the Prairies, and the British mmonarch. They even said that their king was now my king.
Imagine that.

They found me eating with my hands. That’s uncouth, with a sneer they reprimanded me..
Their manners became my manners.

They said something about a Dr David Livingstone from a place I now forget.
I hear he discovered something and named it after a woman he admired. To this day her name has become our name.

When the exam came, they asked me to state the number of planets.
I said nine. They passed me even when the planets now are only eight.

That is how I got all the degrees I now have.
Having satisfied their grooming, they certified me educated.

Educated? I don’t think so.
Groomed. Yes. Moulded. Shaped. Mentally hijacked. Corrupted. Colonised, if you like.

I miss my God.
He and I used to be one.

These people found me living with God. In my hut.
God was in my village, in our midst.

When they came, they got my God from my village and put Him in the sky.
He is still there.

They even came with a picture of their god.
He looked like one of them.

They thrust their God upon me. They said that theirs was the only god. That there were no other gods. That is how their god became my god.

These days when I seek His presence and interventions I look up the skies.
I never look within like my forefathers had always done before.

My God loved drums. Drums and He were one.
The strangers stopped all that.

These sounds are devilish, they admonished.
They summon evil spirits from the dark pits of hell, they warned.

What they didn’t know was that it was this same evil that had kept us alive and well since creation.
It was us.

Why do you pour all this tasty brew onto the ground beneath that tree? Lividly, they asked.
That is how, my form of worship, became evil. And I began to dislike my ways.

Drink the stuff instead, they insisted.
And now, see, together with my libations, my liver is also gone.

My God was spirit.
Instead, the aliens created God in their own image.

They run everything now, including my life.
The installation of their application software in me is now complete.

I am like a programmed automaton now, a puppet incapable of initiating my own individual action.

I am now 60.
Altered. Damaged. Utterly corrupt. A man with no identity and esteem.

Educated, I now frown upon my own kind,
I treat my culture with disdain, as inferior.

I can no longer identify with my own tribe, my own people.
They see me as different.

I speak English.
I speak better English than the average person in London.

But I am not yet accepted as an Englishman.
I am still viewed and treated as a savage requiring control and improvement.

I barely use my mother’s tongue, Chichewa.
The other day someone, pointing at an eagle, said to me, ‘look at just how beautiful that mbalani is.’ I didn’t know what the hell he was talking about.

These days, for me to ably perform my conjugal rites, I now use their medicines, Viagra and all, instead of Mwanya, Mvubwe, or Mtototo. They said that my herbs were primitive.

Unlike in my village, in the city where I now live, largely because of the diet of these strangers, impotence amongst men is now more common than electricity or cultured women.

Siyabonga became Siavonga.

Queen Elizabeth became more important and respected than Kalonga Gawa Undi.

Pumpkin leaves seasoned with groundnuts became anathema, food for the poor.

The Kwacha lost its light.
It became worthless and dark, the picture of Zambia today.

Along the way, a people that used to fend for themselves since the beginning of time began to rely on donor aid.

The people could no longer re-plant the seed that they harvested.
Fooled, they began to rely on engineered ones.

My eyes became saucers when the other day I found thr headman wearing a Chacago Bulls skipper as he was having a meal using a fork and a knife.

Now they want me to drop my wives and take on other men. We do it all the time, they brag.
Regarfing me primitive, civilisation, they call it.

To this day, children in Mwandi are taught about Peter and Jane, and Alice in Wonderland.
They learn more about Sparta and Saskatchewan, about Europe and the Unitef States, than they do about their own villages, traditions and lives, about Mali, Kermet, Namibia or Eswtini.

Never are they informed about exemplary heroes and heroines in their history, never are they reminded about those celebrated and revered women, important and stellar fixtures in our midst who had the capacity to summon the Spirit of rain in times of drought and then rain would come.

I am a driver, you see.
But I drive vehicles I neither manufacture nor own.

Always, they tell me where to go.
Now they even tell me what to grow, when and what to eat and who to mate with.

I cannot create my own wealth.
They pay me.

I cannot self-determine.
The direction I must head towards is always dictated to me.

My family has no cattle anymore.
Once proud farmers in my village, we now own a shop which sells goods we don’t make.

I feel lost.
I am disconnected from my land, my God and my people.

Is there still time, Nyamalenga?
I find myself looking at the skies again.

It was when someone said ‘happy Independence day’ to me that I started to cry.
Kachamba ukakhota suwongoka. That is how I felt. Perhaps that’s the way I am.

This mind of my own has become a dangerous prison for me.
I want to smash my head. I want to break free.

Educated? No.
Groomed. Hijacked. Taken over. Utterly corrupted. Damaged. Hacked.

I want a new mind.
I want my freedom back. I want to be restored.

Nyambe un-set my mind. Re-make me, Mwari.

You see, the real battle isn’t out there, to keep the aliens at bay.
The real battle is within, to protect and thrive innate freedom, to manifest the God within.

Eerily, from the grave and to the heavens, Bob Marley’s words echo and ring strong, urging all wilted leaves to turn green again. His spirit, the Spirit.
‘Emancipate yourselves from mental slavery.’

Indeed, the future is in the past.
We must become again the people we once were.

Indeed, the future is in the children, our children. We must teach them right.
And always remember that knowledge is both innate and acquired.

Protect and save the children NOW.
You see, they are the aliens’ prime target.

Freedom is coming. It is inevitable.
It isn’t here yet.

Created that way, we used to be independent.
We are not anymore.

A cat cannot indefinitely continue to live its life as a dog.
When a rat is forced not to be itself, insurrection is unavoidable.

Birds must be birds. Freedom is that existential environment that permits any entity, any being, to fully express its integrity and capacity as intended by design.

This then is the default setting of life.
Hope springs from the self-correcting character of Nature.

The original will always be superior.
Nonetheless, copies have their own place.

Aluta continua!
The struggle continues!

In due season.
Yes. Then harvest.

Dr Canisius BANDA
Development Activist

24 October 2024
___________

SIX CABINET MINISTERS CAMP IN KAWAMBWA

0

SIX CABINET MINISTERS CAMP IN KAWAMBWA

….to campaign for the UPND candidate ahead of the 27th October, 2024 Kawambwa Council Chairperson by-election

Kawambwa… Wednesday October 23, 2024

The opposition Socialist Party has castigated the UPND government for allowing six cabinet Ministers using tax payers money to camp in Kawambwa ahead of the Kawambwa Council Chairperson by-election.

The opposition political party further alleges that about eight District Commissioners have equally left their work stations in their respective districts to camp in Kawambwa and campaign for the UPND candidate.

Socialist Party Mobilization Secretary Kelvin Kaunda says it is worrying that the UPND government has continued to waste money on things that do not have a direct impact on the people’s lives.

Mr Kaunda says these officials are using government vehicles and that they have removed the registration number plates on most of these State vehicles.

He named the ministers as Frank Tayali, Chipoka Mulenga, Peter Kapala, Elvis Nkandu, Njavwa Simutowe and Elias Mubanga.

“We have been reliably informed that about eight DCs have equally camped in Kawambwa to campaign for the UPND candidate. Some of these DCs have come from Samfya, Mansa, Chiengi, Mwansabombwe, Nchelenge, Mwense and other districts within Luapula Province. They have removed the number plates from the government vehicles, those are the same vehicles they are using. This is a total wastage of public funds by the UPND administration,” he said.

“This is not the first time they are doing this, one day they will be held accountable for wasting tax payers’ money. They lack priority, because if they cared for the people, those funds should have been channeled to needy areas as you know that there are a lot of problems in the country.”

Mr Kaunda also said the SP candidate Ivo Mpasa, is supported by the opposition political parties because they are against the injustice done to Pambashe PF MP Hon Ronald Chitotela, Kawambwa Central PF MP Hon Nickson Chilangwa, immediate past Kawambwa Council Chairperson Kalumba Chifumbe and three others.

“All the comrades of Hon Chitotela, Hon Chilangwa and Mr Chifumbe are supporting Mr Mpasa, the former Kawambwa DC who is now a Socialist Party candidate. We all do not support what happened to these comrades. So we are honoring them by supporting one candidate, who is Comrade Mpasa,” he stated.

On Saturday, 19th October 2024, two candidates successfully filed their nominations; Titus Musa of the United Party for National Development and Ivo Mpasa of the Socialist Party.

The by-election will be held on Sunday, 27th October, 2024.
SP Media

PF IN KAWAMBWA VOWS TO SUPPORT UPND CANDIDATE

0

PF IN KAWAMBWA VOWS TO SUPPORT UPND CANDIDATE

Kawambwa/ Wednesday, 23 October

The Patriotic Front (PF) in Kawambwa has pledged its support for the United Party for National Development (UPND) candidate, Musa Titus, ahead of the upcoming council by-election.

During a campaign rally held in Kawambwa this afternoon, Chewe Siwale, the former Patriotic Front Kawambwa Constituency Chairperson, expressed his dissatisfaction with the state of his former party.

He stated that he could no longer bear the failures of the PF, which he described as being in disarray and lacking direction.

“My party is disorganized because so far it has over four presidents, and this has left me with no option but to seek a more organized political party. UPND is the only party that looks intact,” Siwale said.

Siwale further revealed that he turned down an offer from the Socialist Party, choosing instead to support the UPND due to his belief in its vision and leadership.

He highlighted the positive impact of President Hichilema’s policies, especially in driving economic transformation. “President Hichilema’s good policies are showing positivity in terms of economic transformation,” he added.

The former PF chairperson praised the improvements Kawambwa has experienced under the UPND government, especially through the Constituency Development Fund (CDF). “We have started seeing things we never saw here in Kawambwa because, since the coming of President Hichilema, CDF is doing wonders here,” Siwale stated.

Siwale affirmed his full backing for the UPND, stating that he, along with his family and those who were under his leadership in the constituency, would throw their support behind the ruling party. “Patriotic Front is a finished party, and we cannot continue pretending. We just need to go forward,” he emphasized.

As the by-election approaches, the UPND campaign in Kawambwa has gained momentum, with victory anticipated for Musa Titus.

The UPND campaign team in Kawambwa includes Minister of Small and Medium Enterprises Hon. Elias Mubanga, Minister of Youth, Sports, and Arts Hon. Elvis Nkandu, who serves as Mobilization Chairperson, and Minister of Livestock and Fisheries Hon. Peter Kapala.

Other notable figures include Minister of Commerce, Trade, and Industry Hon. Chipoka Mulenga, Minister of Transport and Logistics Hon. Frank Tayali, and Kafubu MP Bernard Kanengo, who have joined forces to drum up support for the UPND candidate.

The UPND delegation is currently in Kawambwa, campaigning for Musa Titus ahead of the highly anticipated council by-election scheduled for 27th October 2024.

(C) UPND MEDIA TEAM

HAPPY INDEPENDENCE DAY ZAMBIA- HH

0

HAPPY INDEPENDENCE DAY ZAMBIA

FELLOW Zambians, at home and abroad, as we celebrate our 60th Independence Anniversary today, October the 24th, 2024, we reflect with gratitude on the sacrifices made by our forefathers. Their courage, guided by God’s providence, gave birth to the Zambia we cherish today—united, free, and resilient. Our Diamond Jubilee is not only a time to honor the past but also to embrace the future with unwavering hope and determination.

Zambia’s journey over six decades reflects God’s blessings and our national spirit of unity, peace, and perseverance. Like the soaring eagle in our skies, we have risen above challenges, sustained peace, and upheld the principles of justice and equality.

Our commitment to democracy is evident in our smooth transitions of power, respect for freedom of expression, and grassroots development through initiatives like the Constituency Development Fund (CDF).

Even amidst current trials, including severe droughts, our faith remains strong. Through innovation and hard work, we are investing in sustainable solutions like water harvesting and precision agriculture, reaffirming our belief in God’s provision and the strength of our farmers.

As we celebrate our shared cultural heritage—reflected in the songs we sing and the traditions we keep—we are reminded of the unity that binds us as One Zambia, One Nation. Our vibrant youth are our greatest blessing, and by nurturing their potential, we secure a prosperous future for generations to come.

God has endowed us with abundant resources, and it is our sacred responsibility to manage them wisely. With patriotism and faith, we must tackle modern challenges like climate change and corruption, striving to build a just and prosperous nation.

As we honor the legacy of those who came before us, let us celebrate with gratitude and renew our commitment to build a brighter future together. With God’s guidance and our collective efforts, Zambia will continue to shine, united in peace and purpose, for the next 60 years and beyond.

Happy Diamond Jubilee, fellow citizens. May we remain ever faithful to the spirit of One Zambia, One Nation, One People and the Spirit of One God.

God bless you and may He bless the Republic of Zambia.

HAKAINDE HICHILEMA
PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF ZAMBIA

Oppose Plant Breeders Bill

0

Oppose Plant Breeders Bill

As President of the United National Independence Party (UNIP) I am appalled to hear that a Plant Breeders’ Rights Bill is to be tabled to Parliament for the June 2024 session.

The entire process of repealing and replacing the existing Plant Breeders Rights Act of 2007 raises alarm bells.

Did the farmers complain? Of course not.

Did ordinary Zambians demand for this law to be revised? – NO

Did the Seed Control and Certification Institute (SCCI) consult Zambian farmers and plant breeders in drafting the new Bill? – NO

Did the SCCI consult any Government lawyer before the Bill was finalised and subjected to stakeholder consultations? – NO

We understand that the SCCI applied to an overseas international certification body in Europe on behalf of the country for Plant Breeders to be recognised and they were told by the European body that they needed to change this Law in order to be admitted.

This is insanity of the highest order! How should Zambians surrender their God given resources to Multinational companies and destroy the cultural biodiversity to please some international standard

Zambian farmers have been saving, sharing and reusing seeds for generations, and with the advent of intellectual property rights in plant breeding, some of the protected seeds are part of this seed system.

The 2007 PBR Act has exceptions that have allowed farmers to continue this practice even on protected varieties of farm saved seeds. The 2024 Bill however shall take away this right.

The current PBR Act is adequate; there is no need to repeal and replace it. It guarantees the rights of farmers in Zambia to save, share and reuse farm saved seeds, with adequate provisions to protect seed and plant breeders’ interests.

The Zambian farmers have no issues with the Act so what’s changed to usher in such haste and lack of transparency a Bill with no public consultation taking place prior to the writing of a Draft Bill.

Whose interests is driving this Bill? We do not need to be geniuses to say foreign interests and proxies, keen to enslave us with hybrid and GMO seeds, and expensive chemical fertilisers and pesticides.

In this light today I address the multitude of Zambian farmers across the length and breadth of Mother Zambia, and indeed the many Zambians who depend on our urban and rural farmers, to bear witness to something unheard of in modern times or in the annals of our history.

Today I ask the most senior legal experts in Government at the Ministry of Justice who are gatekeepers into what constitutes good Law that protects national interest and heritage of Zambians: how can this be?

How is it that we are allowing a government entity to fashion a Draft Bill that is intended to become Law. A Law that will criminalise the Zambian farmer and destroy aeons and generations of indigenous knowledge and practise?

Seed use throughout Zambia through preservation and sharing and time honoured traditional methods of seed breeding, selection and verification by the Zambian farmer has withstood countless droughts and built immunity to withstand attack from local pests.

This national treasure house stands to be destroyed and rendered obsolete and worse still constitute a criminal offence for the Zambian farmer punishable by jail or fine should a farmer dare to keep their farm saved  seed, share the same or or save it to plant again in the next seasons.

The Zambian farmer under the new Draft Plant Breeders Bill, will be deemed a criminal liable of being jailed for 10 years or fined up to 10,000 Zambian kwacha. This is preposterous!

Have we lost our connection to God and all that is good.

Its insanity never imagined before that the Draft Plant Breeders Bill whilst turning every Zambian farmer that saves, uses, shares seed into a criminal, seeks to protect commercial seed Breeders, seed companies and other commercial entities as the sole and legal owner to the vast array of Zambia’s seed diversity.

The Draft Plant Breeders Bill paves the way for Zambian farmers to be forced to buy hybrid seeds every year that cannot be reused or recycled including the very expensive chemical fertilisers that contribute to soil degradation.

Recycled open pollinated seeds can be grown using purely organic methods of permaculture, a time honoured traditional method that not only is in harmony with mother nature but increases and promotes soil fertility and contributes to enhanced and improved quality and resilience of the gene pool.

Farmers have been selecting and improving seeds for centuries. The Zambian farmer must prove he has added value to be a plant breeder, why when the proof is in the eating of indigenous food, such as millet, sorghum, cassava etc, daily by all Zambians over many healthy generations.

In the unlikely event of this Bill being enacted, seeds that have been cultivated and whose gene pool has been carefully nurtured over generations by Zambian farmers may well find themselves “discovered”, and registered and be owned in their total diversity by Foreign Plant Breeders and their Zambian agents. This must never be allowed to happen in Zambia.

How do foreign Multinational companies and their proxy seed companies operating in Zambia have an upper hand in formulating the Law of the land rather than Zambians themselves? Why should the Law of the land serve the interests of foreigners and not Zambians?

We are reminded of what the great Zambian statesman, Mr. Simon Mwansa Kapwepwe, once said, “If we do not handle our independence correctly then the colonisers shall return as investors. Colonialism is like a chameleon, it does not go away, it only changes colours”.

The PBR Bill is a big step backwards towards recolonisation. He who owns your seeds, owns your food; and he who owns your food, owns you!

This is not the objective for which the Seed Control and Certification Institute was established, to hand over our food sovereignty to foreign interests.

We advise the SCCI to withdraw this Bill and go back to the drawing table, consult with Zambians across the spectrum and expertise, and carry out an impact assessment to save itself time and money.

A wiser and saner course is simply to forget this insane idea altogether and maintain the existing Plant Breeders Act Act No. 18 of 2007. We can not sacrifice our national sovereign birthright. We should instead create our own African Plant Breeders Verification body and operate in independence and patriotism.

Zambia is a country richly blessed by God so let us respect, cherish and hold dear the many blessings God has bestowed on us.

Don’t let education blind us to our mothers’ and grandmothers’ wisdom which have been and continue to be the most expert seed plant Breeders across the globe.

We urge the Government to halt this Bill and its pandora madness. The Attorney General as the gatekeeper of our Laws must stop this legal trek to insanity forthwith and in the future prevent us from traversing a similar path.

In search of precedence we can learn from our sister country Uganda which defeated a similar Bill which was not in their national interest.

We urge Zambians to speak as one voice in defending our national heritage for as the sun rises from the east and sets in the west, rest assured that this Bill shall kill our Zambian farmers by raising the cost of production, enslaving our food system and taking away our sovereignty.

So let us all Zambians shout loudly in unison “No to the Draft Plant Breeders Bill.”

The Rt. Revd. Dr. Musonda Trevor Selwyn Mwamba

President of the United National Independence Party (UNIP)

UNIP – The party that advocates for social justice, national development, and economic independenc

ZAMBIA’S 60TH INDEPENDENCE ANNIVERSARY : A CALL TO ACTION FOR WOMEN’S LEADERSHIP & NATIONAL RENEWAL.

0

ZAMBIA’S 60TH INDEPENDENCE ANNIVERSARY : A CALL TO ACTION  FOR  WOMEN’S LEADERSHIP  & NATIONAL RENEWAL.

====================================================

24 – October, 2024 Thursday

Today, Zambia celebrates 60 years of independence, a milestone that marks a nation’s journey towards self-determination and freedom. As National Chair Lady for Citizens First and United Kwacha Alliance (UKA), I reflect on our nation’s progress and challenges. We honor the sacrifices of our forefathers, who fought tirelessly for our national independence, achieved on October 24, 1964.
Not to stress my followers and people who take time to read my articles, I have Five (5) points to lay on the  nation’s table on this  special day. Natwendwe bonse Mkwai…

1. Recognizing Women’s Leadership

As we celebrate this milestone, I urge our nation to recognize the critical role women play in shaping our future. Women’s leadership is essential for a sanitized political landscape and competent governance. We must create opportunities for women to take leadership positions where women  will be among the  decision makers, ensuring women’s  voices are heard and valued. The United Nations in Zambia has been instrumental in promoting women’s empowerment and  particularly in digital education and technology.

2. A Call for National Renewal*

Our nation faces numerous challenges, from economic struggles to social injustices especially under the  United Party for National Development (UPND) regime.

Citizens First  under the  competent, tried and tested  leadership of  President HARRY  KALABA  commits to saving the many suffering Zambians, ensuring they receive the respect and dignity they deserve. We envision a Zambia where every citizen has access to quality education, healthcare, and economic opportunities. Not ifi tulemona..

3. Towards Economic Independence

As we look to the future, we await the dawn of economic independence. Citizens First is dedicated to ushering in a new era of prosperity, predicted to begin in 2026. Our party will prioritize sustainable development, innovation, and social justice, by empowering zambians to actively participate in economic development through incentive provision to small scale mining of all minerals,increasing the threshold of farmer input support program which will include those in formal employment and  ensuring Zambia’s resources benefit all citizens.

4. Honoring Our Heritage

We pay tribute to our nation’s founding fathers, including Dr. Kenneth Kaunda, Harry Nkumbula, and Simon Kapwepwe, who paved the way for our independence. Their vision for a united and prosperous Zambia continues to inspire us. My prayer is, the Zambian electorates opens up their eyes and  vote wisely in the year 2026.

5. A Brighter Future

As we celebrate 60 years of independence, Citizens First party reiterates its commitment to a better Zambia. We invite all Zambians to join us in shaping a brighter future, where women’s leadership is valued, and our nation prospers for all.

Thank you, and HAPPY  INDEPENDENCE DAY , Zambia!

Ba KALULUSHI NDI MUNTU WENU ine…..

MUNTHALI FAITH

NATIONAL CHAIRLADY;
CITIZENS FIRST/UNITED KWACHA ALLIANCE (UKA).

COMMONWEALTH LEADERS TO DEFY UK ON SLAVERY REPARATIONS

0

COMMONWEALTH LEADERS TO DEFY UK ON SLAVERY REPARATIONS

Commonwealth heads of government are preparing to defy the United Kingdom and agree plans to examine reparatory justice for the transatlantic slave trade, the BBC has learned.

Downing Street insists the issue is not on the agenda for the summit of 56 Commonwealth countries, which begins in the Pacific island nation of Samoa on Friday.

But diplomatic sources said officials were negotiating an agreement to conduct further research and begin a “meaningful conversation” about an issue which could potentially leave the UK owing billions of pounds in reparations.

Frederick Mitchell, foreign minister of the Bahamas, told the BBC: “Once you broach the subject it may take a while for people to come around but come around they will.”

The current” text of the draft summit communique – made known to the BBC – says: “Heads, noting calls for discussions on reparatory justice with regard to the transatlantic trade in enslaved Africans and chattel enslavement… agreed that the time has come for a meaningful, truthful and respectful conversation towards forging a common future based on equity.”

It says the heads of government would play “an active role in bringing about such inclusive conversations addressing these harms” and that they agreed “to prioritise and facilitate further and additional research on the transatlantic trade in enslaved Africans and chattel slavery that encourages and supports the conversations and informs a way forward”.

The text – which could still change once Commonwealth leaders arrive – has been hammered out by diplomats ahead of the summit. British officials succeeded in blocking a plan for an entirely separate declaration on the subject.

The UK did not want any language in the communique about reparatory justice, but at the moment it is having to accept it will include three full paragraphs setting out the Commonwealth’s detailed position.

Reparatory justice for slavery can come in many forms, including financial reparations, debt relief, an official apology, educational programmes, building museums, economic support, and public health assistance.

Officials from Caricom, the body that represents Caribbean countries, have sought to broaden the issue so that it encompasses not just the slave trade across the Atlantic but also the Pacific.

The draft communique says a majority of member states “share common historical experiences in relation to this abhorrent trade, chattel enslavement, the debilitation and dispossession of indigenous people”.

It also refers directly to practices known as “blackbirding”, where Pacific islanders were tricked or kidnapped into slave or cheap labour in colonies throughout the region.

Diplomats said the expectation now was that reparatory justice would be a central focus of the agenda for the next Commonwealth summit in two years’ time in the Caribbean, possibly Antigua and Barbuda.

In the run up to this year’s summit, there have been growing calls from Commonwealth leaders for the UK to apologise and make reparations worth trillions of pounds for the country’s historic role in the slave trade.

A report published last year by the University of West Indies – backed by Patrick Robinson, a judge who sits on the International Court of Justice – concluded the UK owed more than £18tn in reparations for its role in slavery in 14 Caribbean countries.

(BBC News)

Global warming worsening deadly flooding in Africa, warn scientists

0

Flood victims stand beside their belongings offloaded from a canoe that helped them move to safety
Global warming intensified the rainy season in many African countries in 2024, sparking deadly floods, according to scientists.

The World Weather Attribution (WWA) network said on Wednesday that human-driven climate change, caused by the use of fossil fuels, had made seasonal downpours across the Niger and Lake Chad basins 5-20 percent worse this year, unleashing a humanitarian catastrophe.

“These results are incredibly concerning,” said Izidine Pinto, a researcher at the Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute and one of the study’s authors.

He pointed out that “spells of heavy summer rainfall” had become the “new normal” in Sudan, Nigeria, Niger, Cameroon and Chad.

“With every fraction of a degree of warming, the risk of extreme floods will keep increasing,” Pinto added, calling for the United Nations COP29 climate summit to “accelerate the transition away from fossil fuels” when it meets in Azerbaijan next month.

Floods killed about 1,500 people and displaced more than one million in West and Central Africa this year, according to UN aid agency OCHA. The rains also overwhelmed dams in Nigeria and Sudan.

Such downpours “could happen every year” if global temperatures increase to 2 degrees Celsius (3.6 degrees Fahrenheit) above pre-industrial levels, warned WWA. It forecasts that this could happen as early as the 2050s.

The network’s scientists focused on war-torn Sudan, where millions of displaced people have been uprooted by conflict and driven into flood-prone areas.

They used modelling to analyse current weather trends, comparing them with patterns in a world without human-induced warming, finding that monthlong spells of intense rainfall in parts of Sudan had become heavier as a likely result of climate change.

“Africa has contributed a tiny amount of carbon emissions globally, but is being hit the hardest by extreme weather,” said Joyce Kimutai, researcher at the Centre for Environmental Policy at Imperial College in London.

The role of climate change in the floods was compounded by other human-made problems, said scientists, calling for better maintenance of dams and investment in early warning systems.

“This is only going to keep getting worse if we keep burning fossil fuels,” said Clair Barnes from the Centre for Environmental Policy.

South Africans shocked by Siya and Rachel Kolisi’s divorce

0

South African rugby star Siya Kolisi and his wife Rachel have announced their divorce after more than a decade together, leaving their fans heartbroken.

The two often shared their love for each other and their family on social media, and were admired by many South Africans, who saw them as one of the country’s power couples.

The news of their split has caused a frenzy on social media, with fans expressing shock that their celebrated marriage is ending.

The pair have asked for respect and privacy as they try to “navigate this transition”.

Siya Kolisi was captain of the national rugby team which won the World Cup in 2019 and last year, while Rachel has been a vocal advocate for women’s empowerment and social justice in South Africa.

He was the first black captain of the Springboks, in a sport previously associated with South Africa’s white minority.

Many South Africans viewed the mixed-race celebrity couple as a symbol of the “rainbow nation”, where racial tensions are still raw 30 years after the end of apartheid.

In an earlier interview with the BBC, Kolisi revealed the “horrible” social media abuse he and his white wife have experienced.

The pair tied the knot in 2016 after four years of dating, and they have two children together. They also adopted Kolisi’s younger sister and brother after his mother died in 2009.

The couple released a joint statement on Instagram on Tuesday, saying their decision to split was mutual and amicable.

“This decision comes from a place of love, respect and understanding that this is the best path forward for both of us,” they said.

They did not give reasons for their split but acknowledged the challenges they have faced as a couple.

The pair said they would still co-parent their four children and continue to work together on their foundation that they have set up.

The Kolisis had just returned to South Africa, with Siya re-joining the Sharks in September, after he cancelled his one-year contract with French side Racing.

The pair was arguably one of South Africa’s most loved couples, with Siya often describing Rachel as his rock and biggest supporter.

Many South Africans have taken to social media to express their heartbreak over the split, with others expressing support for the duo.

“We need to take family responsibility leave tomorrow as a country. We are shattered with this news of Siya and Rachel with this divorce,” one fan posted on X.

“Their legacy as a power couple will endure, inspiring future generations,” the Times Live website reported.

Call for reparations: A mere excuse by failed African leaders!

0

As the Commonwealth Heads of Government meeting (CHOGM) kicked off this week in Samoa, the topic of reparations for slavery and colonialism has once again been thrust into the spotlight.

Several African nations have taken this opportunity to press their demands for reparations from Western countries, arguing that these historical injustices require compensation.

However, while the suffering caused by slavery and colonialism is undeniable, the calls for reparations in today’s context raise several important questions about historical morality, governance, and the responsibility of modern African states.

Historical Context: Slavery and Colonialism as Global Phenomena

We need to first understand the historical context of slavery and colonialism and how even African kingdoms participated in the slave trade.

The Ashanti Empire was a prominent player in the West African slave trade.

They captured prisoners from rival tribes and sold them to European traders in exchange for firearms and goods. The kingdom thrived economically through this practice, contributing significantly to the transatlantic slave trade.

Similar to the Ashanti, the Dahomey in Benin was notorious for its aggressive slave raids. The Dahomey rulers sold thousands of their fellow Africans into slavery in return for European goods and military support.

To directly receive articles from Tendai Ruben Mbofana, please join his WhatsApp Channel on: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VaqprWCIyPtRnKpkHe08

The committing of slavery and colonialism wasn’t limited to Western countries.

The Ndebele kingdom in Zimbabwe, for example, waged war against Shona-speaking peoples and enslaved many.

Empires like the Zulu, Mutapa, Rozvi, and the Mali Empire dominated and colonized neighboring peoples, taking control of lands and resources.

As a matter of fact, from the 16th century, the Munhumutapa (kings of the Mutapa Empire) captured and sold people as slaves to the Portuguese.

This shows that the concept of conquest and subjugation was deeply rooted in human history across the globe.

Western Empires and Internal Colonialism

Furthermore, slavery and colonialism were not only met by Africans.

History shows us that this was a worldwide phenomenon.

The Roman Empire colonized Britain for nearly 400 years, subjecting the native Britons to military rule and economic exploitation.

The Roman occupation was one of subjugation, but it was an accepted part of empire-building during that era.

During the 8th to 11th centuries, Norse Vikings frequently raided and colonized parts of Britain, Ireland, and northern France.

These invasions were brutal, and many British communities were subjugated or enslaved.

Yet, in spite of this dark history, never have we heard the British or French demanding reparations from the Italians or Scandinavians.

Why is this?

Human history did not condemn slavery or conquest until well into the 19th and 20th centuries.

The world’s growing awareness of human rights and dignity post-World War II culminated in international institutions like the United Nations condemning genocide, slavery, and colonial exploitation.

It is in this context that modern reparations movements have emerged.

This mutual history of conflict suggests that calls for reparations from Western powers to Africa overlook the cyclical nature of power dynamics in human history.

Would it make sense for the British to now demand reparations from Scandinavia or Italy for Viking and Roman conquests?

Should the Shona demand reparations from the Ndebele?

Should the Swazi, Sotho, Tsonga, Pondo, and others seek reparations from the Zulu?

Surely not.

Legal Framework Governing Genocide and Reparations in the Modern Context

We need to understand that there are things, regardless of how despicable and horrendous, that were an acceptable and everyday part of life before the 20th century.

However, with the advent of modern civilization, the world began to frown upon such acts, thereby enacting laws to not only prevent but also punish perpetrators.

Article 4 of the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights prohibits slavery and servitude in all forms. It states that “no one shall be held in slavery or servitude.”

There is also the 1956 Supplementary Convention on the Abolition of Slavery, the Slave Trade, and Institutions and Practices Similar to Slavery.

This convention expands on earlier treaties by explicitly criminalizing slavery-like practices such as forced marriage and debt bondage.

Similarly, the 1930 International Labour Organization (ILO) Convention No. 29 on Forced Labour prohibits all forms of forced or compulsory labor, which is a form of modern slavery.

We also have the ILO Protocol of 2014 to the Forced Labour Convention and the 2000 Palermo Protocol.

The 1960 United Nations General Assembly Resolution 1514 – known as the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples – calls for the end of colonialism and states that the subjugation of peoples under foreign rule is a violation of human rights.

The 2007 UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples protects the rights of indigenous peoples who suffered due to colonization, emphasizing the right to self-determination, cultural integrity, and reparations for past abuses.

Whilst the 1966 International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) guarantees all peoples the right to self-determination, marking the principle that colonized peoples have the right to pursue their political, economic, and social development independently.

As for genocide, the 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide – commonly known as the Genocide Convention – defines genocide and establishes it as a crime under international law, regardless of whether it occurs in times of war or peace.

States are required to prevent and punish acts of genocide.

The 1998 Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC) has jurisdiction over genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity, and the crime of aggression.

Genocide is defined as acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group.

We have witnessed the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) in 1994) which was created by the UN Security Council to prosecute those responsible for the Rwandan Genocide.

It set a precedent for the international prosecution of genocide.

There was also the 1993 International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY), which, similar to the ICTR, dealt with war crimes and acts of genocide during the Yugoslav Wars, including the Srebrenica massacre, considered an act of genocide.

Together, these legal frameworks establish that slavery, colonialism, and genocide are universally prohibited and punishable under international law.

They provide mechanisms for addressing and prosecuting these crimes, making it clear that the global community no longer tolerates such actions.

Nonetheless, this was not the case during the slave trade or colonialism in the pre-20th century.

In that era, these deplorable and vile acts were commonplace and, as already witnessed, even committed by Africans themselves.

Global response to modern-day atrocities

The Holocaust is one of the most recent examples of genocide, where the international community demanded justice and reparations for the atrocities committed.

The state of Israel received reparations from Germany, and Jewish survivors were compensated.

However, this modern form of reparations was grounded in contemporary human rights principles.

In the 1980s Zimbabwe, Robert Mugabe’s Fifth Brigade massacred more than 20,000 Ndebele people in Matabeleland under the guise of quelling dissent.

This was a violation of modern human rights laws and occurred in a post-colonial era, meaning the demand for justice and reparations holds stronger legitimacy compared to events that happened centuries ago.

Over a million Armenians were killed by the Ottoman Empire in 1915 during World War I.

Despite ongoing demands for recognition and reparations from Turkey, the situation is treated as distinct from earlier historical genocides like the Mongol invasions, given its proximity to the modern era and the establishment of international norms regarding genocide.

As can be clearly seen, there is justification for reparations payments for atrocities committed in the modern era since there are now international laws that prohibit and penalize such acts.

Nevertheless, the same can not be said of the same acts committed when humankind still believed that enslaving and colonizing others was a normal facet of life.

Africa’s Resources and the Myth of Eternal Victimhood

Why should Africa even be talking of reparations today when the continent is endowed with vast natural resources to develop itself?

Surely, what will an additional millions or billions of dollars do for the continent that its own abundant richest have failed to achieve?

Or, is the issue of reparations a mere smokescreen to the continent’s own failure to govern itself?

Africa holds 12% of the world’s oil reserves. Nigeria, Angola, and Libya are major oil producers. Nigeria alone generates approximately $60 billion annually from oil.

Despite this wealth, much of the population lives in poverty, highlighting the mismanagement of these resources.

Africa is home to 40% of the world’s gold reserves and 90% of its platinum.

South Africa, the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), and Botswana have significant diamond deposits, yet income inequality remains rampant, and much of the population lives on less than $2 a day.

Middle East: A Study in Contrast

With one of the highest GDP per capita in the world ($62,000 as of 2023), Qatar has used its oil and gas revenues to transform itself into a global financial hub with state-of-the-art infrastructure, universal healthcare, and free education for its citizens.

The UAE has similarly harnessed its oil wealth, boasting a GDP per capita of over $40,000. Investments in tourism, real estate, and financial services have diversified its economy, offering its citizens a high standard of living.

In contrast, African nations with equal or greater natural wealth have failed to uplift their populations due to corruption and poor governance.

Corruption and Governance: The Real African Crisis

Nigeria is the largest oil producer in Africa, earning approximately $60 billion annually from oil exports.

However, due to widespread corruption, much of this wealth does not benefit the general population.

According to the Natural Resource Governance Institute (NRGI), Nigeria lost over $400 billion to oil-related corruption between 1960 and 2020.

In 2021, Nigeria’s petroleum sector reported the loss of approximately 200,000 barrels of oil per day due to theft and sabotage, costing the nation around $4.2 billion in a year.

Angola is the second-largest oil producer in Africa, yet over 50% of the population lives in poverty.

According to Transparency International, former President José Eduardo dos Santos and his family siphoned billions from the state’s oil wealth, leaving behind a legacy of economic inequality and crumbling infrastructure.

The state oil company Sonangol was at the center of corruption scandals involving the misappropriation of billions.

Isabel dos Santos, the former president’s daughter, was accused of looting over $2 billion from state funds, despite Angola being one of Africa’s most resource-rich nations.

Zimbabwe’s Marange diamond fields are estimated to have produced over $15 billion in diamonds since 2006.

However, most of this wealth has gone unaccounted for.

A 2017 report by Global Witness revealed that military and political elites controlled the diamond trade, with little to no benefit for ordinary Zimbabweans.

Despite the country’s diamond wealth, Zimbabwe’s poverty rate hovers at around 49%, and unemployment is rampant.

According to the World Bank, Zimbabwe loses $2 billion annually to corruption, highlighting the systemic mismanagement of resources.

Africa’s Broader Corruption Problem

Africa loses an estimated $88.6 billion annually to illicit financial flows (IFFs), including tax evasion, corruption, and money laundering.

This figure is roughly equivalent to 3.7% of the continent’s GDP.

While African countries receive significant amounts of foreign aid—totaling $50 billion annually—much of it is siphoned off due to corruption.

A study by the African Union showed that around 25% of Africa’s GDP is lost to corruption each year.

Reparations: An Easy Escape from Accountability

Even if Africa were to receive reparations, what guarantees are there that this money will also not be looted and misappropriated by the ruling elite?

Let’s remember, this has happened before.

In Zimbabwe, land reform programs intended to redistribute land from white farmers to black citizens have been mired in corruption and political favoritism.

Much of the redistributed land went to political elites rather than poor rural farmers, resulting in widespread hunger and economic collapse.

Britain, through its Department for International Development (DFID), contributed tens of millions of pounds to support land reform from 1980 to the mid-1990s.

However, reports of elite capture and diversion of funds began to surface, suggesting that large portions of these funds were not reaching the intended beneficiaries.

According to some estimates, of the £44 million that Britain initially set aside for land reform under the “willing buyer, willing seller” model, only a fraction was actually used to purchase land for the landless poor.

African governments have received over $2 trillion in development aid since the 1960s. However, this aid has done little to spur sustainable development due to systemic corruption.

Countries like South Sudan and the DRC have continued to receive billions in foreign assistance, only for much of it to disappear into the hands of warlords and corrupt officials.

Deflecting Responsibility

African leaders’ persistent calls for reparations from Western countries for slavery and colonialism serve as a convenient way to avoid responsibility for their governance failures.

Instead of addressing corruption, inadequate public services, and the plundering of natural resources, they focus on the past to evade accountability for their present actions.

Conclusion

Reparations for slavery and colonialism, while appealing to some, overlook the broader historical context of human conquest and suffering.

The demand for reparations from Western nations is a distraction from Africa’s real challenges: corruption, poor governance, and mismanagement of vast natural resources.

African leaders must take responsibility for their role in impoverishing their people, rather than deflecting blame to events that happened centuries ago.

With wealth in oil, diamonds, gold, and other minerals, Africa could be one of the richest continents on Earth.

Instead, its leaders must focus on reforming their governance systems, tackling corruption, and ensuring that their people finally benefit from the continent’s abundant resources.

© Tendai Ruben Mbofana is a social justice advocate and writer. Please feel free to WhatsApp or Call: +263715667700 | +263782283975, or email: mbofana.tendairuben73@gmail.com, or visit website: https://mbofanatendairuben.news.blog/

WNBA Salary Is Not Enough To Pay Her Bills – Angel Reese

Angel Reese, an All-Star forward for the WNBA’s Chicago Sky has risen to become one of the hottest names in the WNBA.

Despite her on-court success, Reese is revealing that her WNBA salary is not enough to pay her $8,000-a-month rent and monthly bills.

Talking about her finances during an Instagram Live video a few days ago, she said that her salary “doesn’t pay my bills at all”.

Reese lightheartedly encouraged her haters to keep hating because “hating pays the bills.”

She then went into how her role on the Chicago Sky doesn’t cover her main expenses, such as rent.

“Hating pays them bills, baby. I just hope you know the WNBA doesn’t pay my bills at all,” she said.

“I don’t even think that pays one of my bills. Literally, I’m trying to think of my rent for where I stay.

Resse then went on to state: “Let me do the math real quick. I don’t even know my [WNBA] salary is $74,000.”

Many have criticized the WNBA for the salaries they pay those on their respective teams.

Several NBA players including Las Vegas Aces star Kelsey Plum and the Los Angeles Sparks’ Chiney Ogwumike have publicly voiced their frustration with the league’s salaries

WNBA players only get a 9.3% cut of total league revenue, far less than what athletes in other major sports leagues earn.

NBA players receive between 49% and 51% of basketball-related income, while NFL players get 48% of all league revenue and NHL players get 50%.

However, the lifestyle of most of these athletes is about spending more than they earn, and luckily for Reese, her WNBA salary is not her only source of income.

That’s why she joked, “I’m living beyond my means!”

In addition to lucrative sponsorships, Reese can supplement her WNBA income with various side endeavors, with her most recent project being her Unapologetically Angel podcast.

She launched the show in September 2024 and has already released episodes featuring Latto, Mariah The Scientist, Kayla Nicole, Dwyane Wade, and others.

The real story behind Britain’s withdrawal from Zimbabwe’s land reform: Exposing corruption and mismanagement

0

AS SOUTHERN Africa approaches another ‘SADC Anti-Sanctions Day,’ the Zimbabwean government is once again amplifying the narrative that economic sanctions, particularly from Western countries like the U.S. and the UK, are responsible for the country’s prolonged economic struggles.

At the heart of this narrative is the claim that Britain, under former Prime Minister Tony Blair, reneged on its promise to fund Zimbabwe’s land reform program, forcing President Robert Mugabe to adopt the violent and chaotic land seizures that marked the early 2000s.

The Zimbabwean government uses this claim to justify the land seizures and deflect from the root causes of the economic collapse, placing blame squarely on external actors.

However, this narrative is not only misleading but also deliberately deceptive.

The real reasons for Britain’s decision to withdraw from funding Zimbabwe’s land reform lie not in an arbitrary betrayal but in serious concerns over corruption, mismanagement, and human rights abuses within Zimbabwe’s government.

These issues are rarely, if ever, acknowledged by the Zimbabwean leadership when explaining the breakdown of the land reform process.

This article aims to demystify the propaganda surrounding the UK’s withdrawal from land reform funding and highlight the corruption that characterized the program during the time Britain was involved.

It will also expose how the Zimbabwean government has consistently manipulated this narrative to obscure its own role in the country’s economic downfall and how the real reasons for Western sanctions extend far beyond land reform.

The Lancaster House Agreement: Britain’s Initial Commitment

The roots of Zimbabwe’s land reform program stretch back to the Lancaster House Agreement of 1979, which facilitated Zimbabwe’s transition to independence.

One of the key issues negotiated at Lancaster House was land redistribution, as the white minority owned a disproportionate share of Zimbabwe’s fertile land.

To directly receive articles from Tendai Ruben Mbofana, please join his WhatsApp Channel on: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VaqprWCIyPtRnKpkHe08

The agreement stipulated that land reform would be carried out under a ‘willing buyer, willing seller’ model, with Britain agreeing to help fund the process by providing financial support to compensate white landowners willing to sell their land.

In the early years, Britain did provide financial assistance, helping Zimbabwe carry out a relatively successful land reform program during the 1980s.

However, by the 1990s, cracks were beginning to show in the way land reform was being handled.

Rather than benefiting the landless poor, who were supposed to be the primary beneficiaries, much of the land was being allocated to political elites, government allies, and Mugabe’s cronies, while funds from Britain were being diverted for other purposes.

The Rise of Corruption and Mismanagement in Land Reform

By the mid-1990s, corruption and mismanagement had become rampant within the land reform program.

Reports from independent observers and civil society groups in Zimbabwe highlighted how land was increasingly being allocated to those with political connections, rather than the genuinely landless population.

This elite capture of land reform was undermining the very purpose of the program, which was supposed to correct the historical injustices of colonialism by redistributing land to Zimbabwe’s black majority.

Evidence of misuse of British funds also began to emerge.

While Britain was still committed to helping Zimbabwe finance land reform, it became clear that much of the money was not reaching the intended recipients.

For instance, land that was supposed to be redistributed to poor black farmers often ended up in the hands of senior government officials, military commanders, and business elites who were close to Mugabe’s government.

This led to widespread disillusionment among ordinary Zimbabweans, many of whom had supported the independence struggle in the hope that they would finally gain access to land.

Britain, through its Department for International Development (DFID), contributed tens of millions of pounds to support land reform from 1980 to the mid-1990s.

However, reports of elite capture and diversion of funds began to surface, suggesting that large portions of these funds were not reaching the intended beneficiaries.

According to some estimates, of the £44 million that Britain initially set aside for land reform under the “willing buyer, willing seller” model, only a fraction was actually used to purchase land for the landless poor.

The remainder was allegedly diverted for supposed “administrative costs” and other purposes unrelated to land redistribution.

Specific Cases of Corruption in Land Reform

Throughout the 1990s, it became evident that land reform was being captured by political elites rather than benefiting the intended rural poor.

A 1994 government audit found that 5 million hectares of land purchased with British funds for redistribution ended up in the hands of senior politicians, government ministers, military officers, and their families.

This included Kumbirai Kangai, the then Minister of Agriculture, who was directly responsible for the program.

Zimbabwe’s Agricultural and Rural Development Authority (ARDA) and the Land Bank were supposed to help finance land reform projects, providing loans to resettled farmers.

However, much of the money was loaned to politically connected individuals who never used the funds for farming, leading to a significant portion of these loans becoming non-performing.

This contributed to the overall collapse of Zimbabwe’s agricultural sector.

In 2001, Kangai, who oversaw land reform for years, was arrested on charges of embezzling funds related to the land reform process.

He was accused of misusing Z$228 million (Zimbabwean dollars at the time) earmarked for land purchases.

Although the case became politically charged and eventually fizzled out, it exposed the levels of corruption within the highest ranks of government.

These examples reflect a broader pattern of mismanagement and self-enrichment that plagued Zimbabwe’s land reform process, contributing to Britain’s reluctance to continue providing financial support.

It is this rampant corruption – largely unaddressed by the Zimbabwean government—that explains why Britain pulled out of funding, rather than the narrative of betrayal often put forward by Zimbabwean officials.

The Role of Tony Blair’s Government

The real turning point in Britain’s involvement came in 1997, when Tony Blair’s Labour government took office.

The Labour Party, under Blair’s leadership, took a more critical stance on how land reform in Zimbabwe was being conducted, especially in light of the corruption and mismanagement that had come to characterize the program.

In a letter to Zimbabwe’s Agriculture Minister Kangai in 1997, Clare Short, the British Secretary of State for International Development, explicitly stated that the UK no longer accepted responsibility for colonial injustices and was not willing to fund a land reform program that was being mismanaged and corrupted.

Short made it clear that while Britain was still willing to support poverty alleviation programs in Zimbabwe, it would not provide financial support for a land reform process that was enriching the political elite rather than addressing the needs of the landless poor.

This letter is often cited as the moment Britain formally withdrew from its Lancaster House commitments.

However, what the Zimbabwean government fails to mention is that this decision was driven by legitimate concerns about how the land reform program was being handled.

It was not simply a matter of Britain abandoning Zimbabwe, but rather a refusal to fund a program that had lost credibility due to widespread corruption.

Why the Blair Government Pulled Out

The Blair government’s decision to pull out of funding land reform in Zimbabwe was based on several key factors.

As discussed, the land reform program had become deeply corrupt by the late 1990s.

Funds that were meant to compensate white farmers and help black Zimbabweans gain access to land were being siphoned off by political elites.

The UK was not willing to continue financing a program that was being so blatantly misused.

The Lancaster House Agreement had been based on the principle that landowners would be compensated for their land and that land would be redistributed in an orderly, fair manner.

By the late 1990s, this model had broken down, and Mugabe’s government was beginning to pursue a more aggressive approach to land seizures without proper compensation or planning.

Alongside concerns about corruption, the Blair government was increasingly critical of Zimbabwe’s human rights record.

Mugabe’s government was cracking down on political opposition, stifling free speech, and engaging in electoral fraud to maintain power.

Britain, along with other Western nations, was unwilling to support a government that was moving toward authoritarianism.

Zimbabwe’s economy was already beginning to suffer by the late 1990s, and the chaotic way in which land reform was being carried out was exacerbating the situation.

The UK was concerned that continued financial support for land reform would do little to stabilize the economy and could even make things worse by encouraging further mismanagement.

The Zimbabwean Government’s Response and Propaganda

Rather than addressing the concerns raised by the British government, Robert Mugabe’s regime chose to shift the blame onto the UK, framing Britain’s withdrawal as a betrayal of the Lancaster House Agreement.

Mugabe and his officials began to propagate a narrative that portrayed Britain as the villain, accusing Tony Blair of abandoning Zimbabwe’s land reform program and undermining the country’s sovereignty.

This narrative has been repeated ever since, with the Zimbabwean government consistently blaming the UK for the failure of land reform and the subsequent economic collapse.

What is often left out of this narrative is the corruption and mismanagement that prompted Britain’s withdrawal in the first place.

Instead, the Zimbabwean government presents itself as the victim of Western imperialism, using this narrative to justify the violent land seizures that followed in the early 2000s.

The Chaotic Land Seizures of the 2000s

In 2000, the Zimbabwean government launched its Fast-Track Land Reform Program, which involved the violent seizure of white-owned farms without compensation.

This marked a dramatic shift from the earlier “willing buyer, willing seller” approach and led to widespread chaos in the agricultural sector.

While the land seizures were presented as a necessary correction of colonial injustices, they were, in fact, driven by a combination of political opportunism and cronyism.

Much of the land that was seized ended up in the hands of senior government officials and military leaders, rather than the landless poor who had been promised access to land.

There are reports that Mugabe’s daughter Bona owns about 21 farms, yet millions of ordinary Zimbabweans remain landless or forced to eke a living from the same dry, infertile land of the colonial era.

Who knows how many farms those in the ruling elite and their cronies actually possess today.

Now, with the recently announced new Land Tenure Policy, this elitist clique who benefited unfairly from various land reform programs instituted the by government of Zimbabwe since 1980 are suddenly permitted to sell the farms for own financial benefit.

The seizures also devastated Zimbabwe’s agricultural productivity, leading to severe food shortages and a collapse in export earnings.

Demystifying the Propaganda

It is clear that the narrative propagated by the Zimbabwean government is a deliberate attempt to obscure the real reasons behind Britain’s withdrawal from the land reform program.

By focusing solely on Britain’s alleged betrayal, the government is able to avoid confronting its own role in the failure of land reform and the economic collapse that followed.

Conclusion

The real reasons Britain stopped funding Zimbabwe’s land reform program had little to do with a refusal to address colonial injustices and everything to do with corruption, mismanagement, and governance failures.

The Zimbabwean government’s refusal to acknowledge these issues is why Zimbabwe finds itself in an abyss of seemingly unending economic and political mess.

© Tendai Ruben Mbofana is a social justice advocate and writer. Please feel free to WhatsApp or Call: +263715667700 | +263782283975, or email: mbofana.tendairuben73@gmail.com, or visit website: https://mbofanatendairuben.news.blog/

50 Cent Jabs Diddy Amid Legal Battles: “I’ve Been Saying This For Over A Decade”

0

50 Cent is not backing down from his long-held criticism of fellow hip-hop mogul Sean “Diddy” Combs, as the Bad Boy founder faces a flurry of serious legal battles, including allegations of racketeering, sex trafficking, and sexual exploitation.

According to 50 Cent, his recent public comments about Diddy are nothing new. He insists he’s been vocal about his issues with Combs for over a decade.

The G-Unit rapper, known for being outspoken, has maintained a contentious relationship with Diddy. Recently, the legal pressure against Diddy intensified after R&B singer Cassie Ventura filed a high-profile lawsuit against him, which triggered a wave of accusations from other women, culminating in a federal indictment.

Despite these developments, 50 Cent insists that his criticism of Diddy is not a reaction to the latest headlines but part of a long-standing position he’s held for years.

In defending his actions, 50 Cent explained that his remarks may seem more relevant now due to Diddy’s legal troubles, but they reflect his long-held views.

The rapper suggested that his decision to distance himself from Diddy over the years has given him a unique perspective. He highlighted that, unlike others in the industry, he stayed away from Diddy’s social circles, which he claims were marked by the behavior now coming to light in court.

Amid the controversy, 50 Cent has revealed plans for a Netflix docuseries centered around Diddy’s career and the legal allegations he now faces. The rapper believes he’s in a unique position to produce the project because, in his view, he was never close to Diddy on a personal level. He implied that others in the entertainment industry may hesitate to speak out due to their involvement or knowledge of the alleged misconduct.

Meanwhile, the legal challenges for Diddy continue to mount. On Sunday, attorney Tony Buzbee, representing several of Diddy’s accusers, announced the filing of seven new lawsuits, some involving incidents allegedly dating back to 2000. The new claims come from women accusing Diddy of sexual misconduct, with Buzbee stating that the majority of the events occurred as recently as 2022.

‘ZANU-PF has sellouts,’ Mnangagwa confirms

0

ZANU-PF’s seemingly tense conference has forced its first secretary, Emmerson Mnangagwa to publicly warn against routine disloyalty and signals his preparedness to thwart any possibility of disorder caused by revolutionary sellouts.

Setting tone for a drastic approach that his camp will embark on during the forthcoming Bulawayo conference (if there could be anything threatening his peace), Mnangagwa rhetorically quizzed in Ndebele dialect if there are sellouts amongst ZANU-PF central committee members.

“Silabathengisi yini lapha? [Do we have sellouts here?]” Mnangagwa rhetorically quizzed during sloganeering.

“Every leader of the party including ordinary members must contribute and stand by the side of the party. Our rhetoric and actions as cadres, must be reflective of this reality, both during the day and at night, in public and private,” Mnangagwa warned.

Mnangagwa advised central committee members during the address that their meeting is different from talk shows, hence the need to conclude outstanding business, including pertinent resolutions of the 20th national people’s conference and 7th National People’s congress.

“ZANU-PF members must always be educated on the importance of genuine and correct party structures, starting at the lowest level, the cells and villages; moving up to branches and districts,” Mnangagwa said.

“If each level is correctly constituted, then the party has a sustainable base and foundation. There is a need to always guard against infiltration and waywardness within party structures,” Mnangagwa added.

“We must decisively deal with abuses and not abandon our structures. Only hidden agendas create such abuses. The solution to challenges, for example within DCCs, is not to destroy the structure, but to correct the anomalies through the adherence to party constitution, rules and procedures,” Mnangagwa further said.

Meanwhile, ZANU-PF national spokesperson, Christopher Mutsvangwa has claimed that Zimbabwe’s gold backed currency will gain its value against all odds of inflationary levels.

“From the President’s speech yesterday during the poliburo meeting, he announced that he has confidence in youths who are doing well in mining so that is another instance where ZiG will gain and maintain its value,” Mutsvangwa said.

“He also spoke about title deeds where every household in Harare is confident about security in property ownership,” Mutsvangwa said.

Meanwhile, Mutsvangwa assures the public that the forthcoming ZANU-PF conference will be peaceful, distancing claims of possible factional clashes as mere virtual threats to paint negative images on internal party relations.

“ZANU-PF is not run on social media, it is a well organised party which prioritises discipline from administrative and operational levels,” Mutsvangwa said.

There were reports that the revolutionary party’s infighting will further spill over during the forthcoming 21st National People’s conference in Bulawayo, but some affiliate organisations and factional foot soldiers have expressed their commitment to quell the camp that is calling for Emmerson Mnangwa’s aspirations to stay in power after constitutional term limit expires.

To date, ZANU-PF has lost over 197 of its influential party membership through death as announced by its secretary, Obert Mpofu.

Chamisa loyalists opposed to Zimbabwe’s Commonwealth readmission

A faction of the Citizens’ Coalition for Change (CCC) party, primarily loyal to former leader Nelson Chamisa, has publicly opposed Zimbabwe’s attempt to rejoin the Commonwealth under President Emmerson Mnangagwa’s administration. The Commonwealth, an association of 56 member states largely comprised of former territories of the British Empire, promotes peace, democracy, and development while providing a platform for collaboration on various issues among its members.

In a statement, CCC spokesperson Promise Mkwananzi articulated the party’s concerns, urging the Commonwealth to reject Zimbabwe’s application for readmission. He criticized the August 2023 general elections, describing them as “deeply flawed” and marked by significant voter intimidation, manipulation by the Zimbabwe Electoral Commission (ZEC), and unresolved irregularities in vote tallying.

Mkwananzi highlighted the ongoing incarceration of faction leader Jameson Timba and other party activists since June 2024, emphasizing the adverse environment for the opposition. He stated, “In addition to the failed electoral system, the opposition faces unprecedented attacks. Our members, including Amos Chibaya and Senator Timba, have been unjustly arrested and detained without trial, while others remain behind bars under politically motivated charges.”

The spokesperson also pointed to the fraudulent recall of 15 MPs and 17 councillors by individuals unaffiliated with the CCC as evidence of the regime’s subversion of democratic norms. He further alleged that funds intended for the party have been diverted to imposters, constraining their ability to advocate for democracy.

Mkwananzi continued to express concerns over the judiciary’s integrity, claiming it has been captured by the executive branch, with court rulings consistently favoring the government and disregarding constitutional rights. He cited Chief Justice Luke Malaba’s controversial tenure extension, which legal experts deemed unconstitutional, as a further indication of the judiciary’s compromised credibility.

The spokesperson also referenced ongoing corruption scandals, including those involving the Zimbabwe Electricity Supply Authority (ZESA) and Kuvimba Mining House, which he claimed have eroded public trust in government institutions. Mkwananzi emphasized that victims of state-sponsored violence, including members of the opposition, continue to seek justice.

In light of these systemic issues, Mkwananzi urged the Commonwealth to reject Zimbabwe’s application for readmission until genuine reforms are implemented. He asserted that “Zimbabwe must restore democratic integrity and accountability before it can be welcomed back into the international community.”

The CCC’s firm stance underscores the party’s commitment to advocating for democracy and accountability in Zimbabwe, as they call for urgent reforms to address the myriad challenges facing the nation.

Source – pindula

Woman jailed for 25-years for k!lling all her family members

0

A Pretoria high court judge has described the involvement of a daughter in the murd3r of her parents, pregnant sister, and brother as a profound betrayal.

Judge Mashudu Munzhelele sentenced 24-year-old Onthatile Sebati to 25 years in prison for her role in the 2016 k!llings, while her cousins Tumelo and Kagiso Mokone were handed life sentences.

The horrific incident saw the d3aths of Onthatile’s father, police constable Solomon Lucky Sebati, her mother Mmatshepo, a nurse, her 19-year-old pregnant sister Tshegofatso, and her three-year-old brother Quinton, all shot in their home in Mmakau, North West. Onthatile was 15 years old at the time of the k!llings, while her cousins were both 18.

Judge Munzhelele remarked on the emotional devastation caused by the crime, particularly the involvement of a family member. “The murd3r of four individuals, including parents and children, is a heinous act of violence, and the fact that accused number two [Onthatile], a family member, was an accomplice in the k!lling of her family intensifies the emotional devastation and the seriousness of the crime,” the judge stated.

According to the state, Onthatile planned the k!llings and enlisted her cousins to carry out the crime, even providing them access to the house and her father’s service firearm. Kagiso shot the family while Tumelo waited in the getaway vehicle. After the murd3rs, Onthatile paid her cousins R100,000 from insurance payouts.

In a shocking turn of events, five years after the crime, Onthatile confessed to relatives, leading to their arrests. They were charged with theft, four counts of murd3r, robbery with aggravating circumstances, and possession of a firearm and ammunition, and were found guilty earlier this year.

The court heard that Onthatile’s betrayal has left deep emotional scars on the Sebati family, with relatives struggling with mental health issues stemming from the tragedy. The judge declared the trio unfit to possess firearms and gave them two weeks to appeal their sentences.

Onthatile’s aunt, Japhitaline Sebati, hailed the sentencing as “justice served,” adding, “It is painful to see such an intelligent child waste her future, but I hope she gets rehabilitated.”

Woman who k!lled boyfriend by zipping him up in suitcase speaks about what happened

0

Sarah Boone, the woman accused of k!lling her boyfriend by zipping him into a suitcase is standing trial after the February 2020 de@th of her boyfriend, Jorge Torres, Jr.

Over four years after Torres died at the age of 42, Boone took the stand during a court appearance on Tuesday, Oct. 22. and recalled her and Torres playing a game of hide-and-seek.

Boone said during the game she ran to an upstairs restroom to hide in the shower and waited for “quite some time.” She said she “decided” to “start wrapping up the evening” as she was ready to go to bed.

She went downstairs to look for Torres when she saw him “settling himself into a suitcase,” later adding that “he was trying to get himself flat so I couldn’t see that he was in there.”

“I zipped him up. We thought it was funny and were joking about how he was small enough to fit inside the suitcase,” said Boone.

“From there, we were laughing about it, and it was just strange that he was small enough to fit in there, and then I kind of moved it around a little bit with him in the suitcase still. It was still funny that he was still in the suitcase. I think he and I couldn’t believe that he could fit in the suitcase.”

She alleged that Torres had already pulled the top of the suitcase on top of him, and she zipped him up, which she said they both thought was “funny.”

“From there, I moved the suitcase around a couple of times on the wheels and moved it around and at that point it was still it was funny we were joking and laughing about it,” she said.

Boone — who also claimed that Torres had been abusive on multiple occasions — said the suitcase was “flopped over” due to her moving it around. She began videotaping, noting that she wanted to “take the time to talk” to Torres since he “was not able to get out,” giving her the chance to speak to him “in a manner I ordinarily would not have the ability to do.”

In Boone’s footage that was shown in court, the suitcase, with Torres presumably inside, is seen as he is heard saying her name. She tells him in part, “For everything you’ve done to me,” as she continues taping.

Boone, who confirmed in her testimony that she was intoxicated, said things got “heated very quickly” as Torres allegedly threatened her and “continued to push on the suitcase.”

After his hand allegedly got out of the suitcase, she claims that she “shook” the suitcase as he Torres was “forcefully” trying to get out and, in a “split-second reaction,” got a baseball bat to “poke his hand to go back in.”

Boone said she felt “safe” enough to turn the suitcase back over and claimed she left enough room for him to get out. She allegedly then went to sleep and found him de@d in the suitcase the next day.

A forensic pathologist testified during the trial that Torres d!ed as a result of positional asphyxia with environmental suffoc@tion, with the manner of de!th classified as a hom!cide.

Xavi Hernandez reportedly holds Man United talks as pressure ramps up on Erik ten Hag

0

Former Barcelona coach, Xavi Hernandez has emerged as a potential target for Manchester United if the club decide to sack manager Erik ten Hag.

The Red Devils have made a terrible start to the new Premier League season with Ten Hag’s side currently 12th after eight matches.

Man Utd have won just three of those eight games and that has piled pressure on the Dutchman to turn around their fortunes.

According to Mail Sport, Manchester United’s intermediaries have made contact with the former Barcelona star twice in the last few months.

A four-man delegation led by chief executive Omar Berrada flew out to Barcelona last Thursday, although United sources say that a number of high-level meetings have taken place in the Catalan capital recently because co-owner Sir Jim Ratcliffe has been there to support Ineos Britannia sailing team in their battle with New Zealand for the America’s Cup.

‘But it has also fuelled speculation that Xavi could be a contender if Ten Hag is axed after two-and-half years in charge.

However, United sources maintain that Ten Hag remains their manager and the club have no plans to make a change as he prepares to face Fenerbahce in the Europa League on Thursday.

Former Man Utd chief scout Mick Brown – who remains well-connected at Old Trafford, recently said Ten Hag is “always one defeat away” from being sacked.

Brown told Football Insider: “Just winning a few games won’t be enough and he’ll know that.

“You can win three games on the bounce, but one shock defeat and that pressure will be back.

“Every time you lose a game at Manchester United, you’re under the kosh. That’s always been the case. You’re always one defeat away.

“So it’s good to win games, and he needs to win games, that’s the only way he’ll be able to keep his job, but even that might not be enough.

“They’ve got a good run of games coming up, but that only increases the pressure.

“We’ve been in this position before where they get all three points from a game and look like they can push on, but then they lose again.

“All it takes is one loss for the crowd to turn and all of a sudden a decision has to be made.”

Court has quashed the decision made by Second Deputy Speaker to declare the nine PF Seats vacant

0

The Lusaka High Court has quashed the decision made by Second Deputy Speaker, Moses Frank Moyo to declare the nine (9) Seats vacant.

FINDINGS

6.28 ‘The Respondent, in addition, to stating that the Second Deputy Speaker proceeded in accordance with the provisions of Article 72(5) and(8) of the Constitution, contended that the Second Deputy Speaker proceeded as he did because the active Matter was similar to the one that had been dismissed and that the Matter was therefore res judicata.

This clearly shows that the Second Deputy Speaker was aware of the Matter filed on 27th June, 2024 and this is also alluded to in the Respondent’s Affidavit in Opposition.

Clearly, the determination of whether a Matter is res judicata or is an abuse of Court process or has no merit or is indeed against public policy is the preserve of the Court and not of the Second Deputy Speaker of the National Assembly.

6.30 Thus, by proceeding to make the Ruling on 3rd July, 2024 and communicating to the Electoral Commission that a vacancy had occurred in the respective Constituencies represented by the Applicants when he
was well aware of an active Matter before Court, the Second Deputy Speaker did so without jurisdiction as the Matter was subjudice.

I am fortified in this view by the holding in the already cited case of ChishimbaKambwili
Constitutional Court stated, inter alia, that:
“since the issue was already pending
determination in the Courts of law, the
Speaker by proceeding as he did, fell foul of
the sub judice rule.”

Second Deputy Consequently, I find that the
Speaker’s decision-making process was marred with irrationality; it was ultra vires his mandate and he fell foul of the sub judice rule as he usurped the authority of the Court to determine whether or not there was a matter properly before Court in relation to the
Applicants challenging their expulsions from their Party.

6.32 Based on the foregoing finding, I find it otiose to delve into whether or not there was compliance with Parliamentary procedure as contained in the Standing Orders the National Assembly of Zambia, precedence and custom or whether there was an alternative remedy available to the Applicants

CONCLUSION
7.1 In sum total, I find that the decision of the Second Deputy Speaker of the National Assembly of Zambia to declare the seats vacant was ultra vires/without jurisdiction and irrational.
7.2 Consequently, the Applicants are hereby granted the Order of Certiorari and the decision of the Second Deputy Speaker to declare the seats held by the Applicants vacant is hereby quashed.
7.3 Costs are for the Applicants to be taxed in default of agreement.
Leave to appeal is granted.

About my appearance at the 9 MPs Court Cases today- Miles Sampa

0

*About my appearance at the 9 MPs Court Cases today*

MBS23.10.2024

This afternoon at the Constitution Court (ConCourt) scheduling conference meeting of the 9 PF MPs by elections petition as raised by Mr Isaac Mwanza, I applied viva voche (verbally) to the ConCourt Judges to join the matter as an interested party. The Judges ruled that I make a written application via lawyers ideally as this is the norm.



I will therefore do like wise as I am determined to play my role in all the relevant cases so that the 9 MPs do not go to by elections. This is because I did pardon them in writing within time in the context of the matter but the deputy Speaker Moses Moyo ignored my amnesty in his ruling.

After the ConCourt scheduling conference meeting at the Supreme Court. I then escorted the 9 MPs to the High Court for their scheduled ruling on the same as petitioned by them under Judge Susan Wanjelani. As good omens may have it, the ruling was in favour of the 9 MPs and we were all jubilant.

At this point of the National geopolitics, I would rather lose my MP seat or position and go for a by elections than for the 9 MPs to do so.  Not in my DNA of politics to sacrifice 9 MPs and to also subject the Nation facing financial challenges to spending colosal amount of money on avoidable by elections. It’s the reason I offered them amnesty and pardon in the first place and despite it not having been honoured by Parliament, I am still and will go the extra miles to avert the 9 by elections on the 9 PF MPs.

The need for a united front today at the courts overrode our internal conflicts  which I must be proactive to state that they remain deadlocked for reasons well known by most. Notwishtsanding, today we had an external matter to deal with and together we did it.

In all honest; if true its numbers the governing UPND need to change the constitution to their liking, they don’t need to sacrifice the 9 MPs and yes the point of order that led to the ruling was raised by the UPND MP & Minister Cornelius Mweetwa. They can achieve the same numbers the need from some willing PF MPs we have watched publicly who for a few carrots dangled are so far agreeing to dance publicly to their tune. The list thus far should be good for their constitutional amendment purposes despite the public outcry against.

On our part we will not expel anyone MP for dancing to the tune of the ruling party for the same cost implications to the treasury for piteous by elections that can be caused. We will therefore leave it to the Zambians to judge in 2026 individually the PF MPs publicly crossing the floor.

As for internal PF matters, it’s another topic for another day if at all we will ever be able to resolves them from both or all factions.

Aluta Continua

Miles Bwalya Sampa, MP
President: Patriotic Front (PF)
23rd January 2024

UKA Celebrates Zambia’s 60 years democratic journey of Independence

0

Zambia @ 60 Years

United Kwacha Alliance – UKA Celebrates Zambia’s 60 years democratic journey of Independence.

United Kwacha Alliance is happy and joins the rest of the country in celebrating zambia’s 60 years of Independence from the British colonial rule which marked the new era of self governance and national building.

For the past 60 years now, zambia has made tremendous improvement and recorded great achievement in many sectors of the economy.

This is a milestone worth acknowledging and UKA wishes many zambians to join hands and reflect on our great and many  achievements.

Our fellow citizens, we would also love to say that , After many years of democratic progress, today Zambia is seemingly moving backwards in terms of eroding democracy and in some sections, some even fearing a return to colonial-era power dynamics with violations of fundamental human rights and freedoms enshrined in our republic constitution.

UKA takes a strong position in promoting and upholding democracy and civil liberties of citizens and aims to strengthen institutions that promote transparency, and accountability for a prosperous zambia once voted in government.

On this Special day, we rededicate our commitment in addressing the economic diversification beyond mining to ensure sustainable growth for our country and our citizens.
Comrades and friends, United Kwacha Alliance stands firm in ensuring the protection and defending our sovereignty for a just and fair country that puts the interests of Citizens at heart, at the same time promote social Justice, quality education, fight poverty, and improve healthcare for all.

Comrades in the struggle, Our independence is a clear testament to honor the nation’s founding fathers and mothers who fought for our country’s sovereignty and democracy.
To all our freedom fighters, we acknowledge and salute you for the great fight and work you did in liberating Zambia and wish you well and at the same time wish those who have passed away to continue resting in peace.

As United Kwacha Alliance,(UKA) we acknowledge the  challenges our country is facing at the moment and prays with a strong belief that political players will embrace the national and democratic values and forge a brighter future for Zambia with much emphasis on “One Zambia, One Nation” .

Fellow citizens, we are all reminded by our motto which embodies the country’s unity and aspirations.

As Zambia moves forward, it’s crucial to uphold the principles of independence, democracy and human rights in ensuring a brighter future for generations to come.Therefore, United Kwacha Alliance calls upon citizens to love one another, support and love their country and work towards  rediscovering Zambia’s democratic footing and build strong economic environment for a brighter future for its people. UKA – A people’s Movement.

Sakwiba Sikota
Chairperson
United Kwacha Alliance-UKA

NINE AND OTHER PARLIAMENTART SEATS ILLEGALLY TARGETED FOR BY-ELECTIONS- PF

0

NINE AND OTHER PARLIAMENTART SEATS ILLEGALLY TARGETED FOR BY-ELECTIONS

We have noted the latest action in the Constitutional Court by a Petitioner, Isaac Mwanza taking legal action against the Electoral Commission of Zambia (ECZ) and the Attorney General seeking to declare the nine seats vacant and attempting to compel ECZ to hold by-elections.

The matter of the nine MPs is active in the Lusaka High Court and the demands by Mr. Mwanza are irregular and unlawful.

We will inform you what action we will take to ensure that the rule of law is respected.

We are, however, not blind or oblivious to the political machinations and orchestrated underhand methods that the UPND government is engaged in and is actively seeking to ensure that the by-elections take place in the nine constituencies.

We are also aware that the UPND has targeted other seats such as Kawambwa, Pambashe, Matero, Petauke Central, and Chawama constituencies for urgent by-elections.

For example, despite Hon. Tasila Lungu-Mwansa being on maternity leave and dealing with post-natal issues of the child, this government is ruthless and lacks respect for maternity leave regulations and display no compassion for a young mother, but are determined to declare such seats vacant.

Further the case of Hon Emmanuel JJ Banda is another case in point. It is this same government, whose officials are accused of having abducted the Petauke Central independent MP. Furthermore it this government that proceeded to slap oppressive criminal charges, illegally and unfairly incarcerated him despite the fact that the matters they were pursuing were previously settled by the courts. It is in their hands and custody that Hon. Banda was when he staged what they claim is an escape.

THABO KAWANA AND HIS CONFESSION THAT HIS GOVERNMENT STOPPED EDGAR LUNGU FROM VISITING CHIWEMPALACHILILABOMBWE

We are rather shocked but amused at the statement issued by Permanent Secretary of Information and Media, Thabo Kawana who has disclosed that according to government, Zambia’s Sixth President, Edgar Chagwa Lungu was not attacked or stoned in Chingola but was “only stopped by authorities to travel to Chiwempala and Chililabombwe”.

Kawana also stated that “authorities” had to ensure that President Lungu “only attended to the funeral program of the Kambwili brothers he had come to attend.amd nothing else”

This is illegal and criminal as Government cannot prescribe or limit the freedoms and rights that the former President enoys, in his personal capacity or official.

President Lungu has always condemned these actions to stop him from jogging, or going to church or visiting areas of his choice. He has previously stated that he is vrtually under house arrest. The revelations by Kawana go to reveal the validity of President Lungu’s persistent complaints.

If it is true as confessed by Mr. Kawana that the authorities stopped President Lungu from going where he wished to go, we have to take legal and other actions against those that perpetrated this illegality.

We wish to put it on record again that a formal report has been submitted to Chingola Central Police Station about the attack on the former President.

Six out of nine perpetrators were identified and named and the vehicles they were using also reported to the Zambia Police.

We hope that the Zambia Police will pursue this matter without fear, bias or favour as the attack forms part of bad precedent for our country.

MICHAEL SATA 10TH MRMORIAL ANNIVERSARY

The country is celebrating the life of Zambia’s Fifth President, Mr. Michael Chilufya Sata.

Our members are directed to participate in the programs of his memorial.

For those in Lusaka, we are encouraged to gather at the Embassy Park on Monday 28th October 2024 at 09:00hrs.

NoIasued by;
Amb. Emmanuel Mwamba
Chairperson for Information and Publicity
Member of the Central Committee
PATRIOTICFRONT

Nalumango and Imenda could have been a breath of fresh air in the stale and schizophrenic male dominated UPND politics; sadly, they are not- Azwell Banda

0

Nalumango and Imenda could have been a breath of fresh air in the stale and schizophrenic male dominated UPND politics; sadly, they are not

By Azwell Banda,

Last Sunday, the UPND held a women mobilisation rally in Kabwata.

Two of the top leaders of the UPND were present at the rally: Vice President Mutale Nalumango and UPND deputy secretary general Gertrude Imenda. Here was a golden opportunity for these two powerful politicians to speak to fellow Zambian women through the UPND Kabwata women mobilisation rally. It is Zambian girls and women who are carrying the heaviest burden of our ongoing national troubles.

Zambian girls and women are the backbones of our society: our patriarchal system assigns to them the burden of taking care of human life, feeding it, cleaning it, watering it, tending to it when it is sick, getting it to school and work, and sustaining its now extremely strained nerves, as hunger, poverty, diseases and general national despondency creeps in. During funerals, it is women who are allowed to put up a public display of mourning for the dead. It is therefore not surprising that girls and women, especially from unemployed, employed and poor urban and rural sections of our population are the most active in our politics: they form the bulk of the membership of all our political parties and they are usually voters during elections.

On August the 21st 2021 our sisters, mothers, aunts and grandmothers voted overwhelmingly for Hakainde Hichilema and the UPND on the hope that the punishing high cost of living then would be reduced by a UPND government. This is what the UPND promised when they were in the opposition. Of course, Zambia’s women also hated and bore the brunt of political party cadre violence in public places including at bus stations and in markets. They voted against this violence when they ushered the UPND into government. While it is true that the levels and forms of political violence have reduced, the violence is still there especially during by-elections.

Hunger, diseases and poverty have all dramatically increased, contrary to UPND promises when they were in the opposition. As money has become very scarce, Zambian women find that they need more of it to buy smaller quantities of mealie meal, relish, sugar, cooking oil, soap, salt, candles, toilet paper and all the things needed to run a home and prevent domestic violence. It is now the burden of women to find ways to feed families in the absence of electricity, especially in the urban areas. Making sure there is charcoal and firewood in the home have become painful everyday reminders to Zambian girls and women of the deceitful UPND election promises of ending load shedding and expanding electricity coverage throughout the country, especially in our rural areas.

Zambian women and girls are back to the charcoal pressing iron, in our urban areas. A small well to do section of our girls and women did not know about this charcoal iron business until now, thanks to the punishing electricity load shedding. There is something extremely backward and primitive in reverting to the charcoal iron at a time in history when other countries are sending their rich citizens into space, as tourists. The UPND in opposition rejected climate and drought as good excuses for load shedding: Hakainde Hichilema famously used the example of Arabs whose countries do not see rains “for 10 years” and yet they have constant supply of electricity. He blamed load shedding on the incompetence and corruption of the Patriotic Front government.

Today, in government, the UPND is shrinking access to electricity by their draconian removal of subsidies from electricity and gargantuan appetite for profits through their sadistic deployment of “cost-reflective” tariffs, for electricity. We have moved from promises of cheap and accessible electricity to extremely expensive but rare electricity. Some homes in our urban areas will now never, ever, be connected to the electricity grid, as the cost of electricity installations has priced them out of the market for electricity. As the cost of electricity has dramatically increased, so have the prices of everything our girls and women need to take care of life.

It is the punishing water crisis especially in our urban areas which has best exposed the undying primitive patriarchy at the heart of our family life in Zambia. Girls and women must make sure there is water in the home, otherwise there will be n o food made. It will take quite some unlearning and hard mental work to undo the damage to sleep patterns of most girls and women and to revert to their normal biological clocks: load shedding means keeping awake at night in anticipation of electricity so that some water may be trapped and stored. And yet the girl and woman will still be expected to be at school and report for work (if employed) on time, in the morning!

Cholera is already knocking on the door. The last episode of cholera claimed more than 700 lives, mostly young lives. Threatening to be joined by monkey pox and several other diseases sweeping the globe today, it will again be Zambian girls and women who will bear a disproportionate share of the brunt of these diseases, in Zambia. All these existential crises morph into pre-existing gender and domestic violence, in Zambia. Zambian girls and women are forced to put up with the ever-present threats of violence and rape, and to suffer these atrocities on their bodies and minds, when they happen.

You cannot “mobilise” for anything, let alone in and into a political party, without first being clear about why such mobilisation must take place. “…I understand that challenges continue as life continues. I keep saying if you are a teacher like me and you are marking exams, normally there is a threshold for failing or passing. But I believe you ladies, women, the youths and the men that are here do remember your 10-point plan. Do you remember your manifesto? And when you look at the manifesto then you start ticking, that is what you should be doing. That these are the things we promised, have we gotten zero? Do we have 80 percent? I believe that today we are close to 80 percent in the three years of the promises we made to the Zambian people. As the UPND members you need to check and tick what has been achieved so far. That is how you will get the strength to go on and tell everybody that is criticising this government of what it has done,” said Mutale Nalumango at the Kabwata rally, dully reported in News Diggers.

Mutale Nalumango, if she truly believes what she said in Kabwata last Sunday, badly and urgently needs a sanity check-up. In politics, when in government, a political party can tick the dots and get 110% of their manifesto done: if the majority of the people of the country are materially and mentally worse off than they were before such a political party was elected into government, the manifesto of such a political party is not worthy the paper it is written on! What exactly was going on in the minds of the sane women at the Kabwata women mobilisation rally as Nalumango said this? These women do not live in a separate and better Zambia than all of us! Immediately after the rally, the majority of these women hopelessly crawled back into their hungry, moneyless, load shaded, waterless, and need I add, sick people infested homes. And yet Nalumango told them to mobilise women because the UPND government has already fulfilled close to 80 percent of its election promises.

Gertrude Imenda perfectly illustrated the stale, thoroughly uninspiring, schizophrenic and zombie like UPND politics which has infected these two leaders: “We are here because the issue is about mobilisation. The party needs to be mobilised but when I look [at people], I have observed something… when we were in opposition, we were beaten for wearing regalia. We wanted so very much to wear regalia but we were being stopped and beaten. If you passed by intercity in a regalia you were a dead meat. But now you are in government, the ruling party but you are shy to wear regalia. What is the problem? Because I don’t think you do not have the regalia. We were given during the campaigns, and when the President was going around when we were celebrating there was also regalia,” said Imenda, as reported in News Diggers.

Gertrude is always interesting whenever she speaks, in quite some morbid ways.

“But now you are in government, the ruling party but you are shy to wear regalia. What is the problem? Because I don’t think you do not have the regalia.” Vice President Nalumango pledged to give one bale of UPND citenge regalia to each of the five wards in the Kabwata constituency. Did these two great leaders of the UPND plan together about what to say at the rally? I do not think so. Sane UPND members, both females and males, are not proud to wear their UPND regalia in their communities: they too feel betrayed by their party, and are careful not to revive violence in our communities by insultingly thrusting the UPND into the faces of equally betrayed and angry Zambians, by arrogantly wearing UPND regalia! Only well fed Imenda and Nalumango cannot get this.

Perfectly insanely, Gertrude Imenda insisted: “But I see you are not wearing regalia. What is the problem? Let us wear the regalia. Let us be proud of the regalia. I want to salute those who are wearing the regalia. Next time when we are going to mobilise let us wear regalia because this is called visibility, let UPND be visible. When you are in the market, stores, anywhere, wear the UPND regalia. It is our symbol, and we are in power. Just wear red. Let us wear the party regalia because that is another form of mobilisation.” Jesus of Nazareth, please come down and save us from these fires of hell! “…be proud of regalia” Why, Gertrude? “It is our symbol, and we are in power.” Who is “we” who are “in power” dear Gertrude? On whose behalf must perfectly sane UPND members make UPND “visible”? It is a fact of life that the betrayed, shamed and humiliated do not make a habit of putting out in public their betrayal, humiliation and shame…

These two powerful women leaders of the UPND perfectly illustrate the disconnect and massive social distance between the ordinary members of the UPND and their impoverished and hungry base. They also mirror perfectly the sterility and schizophrenia of the politics of all the leaders of the UPND. Pity, these two women have the greatest opportunity to call out the fake politics of the men in their political party. What is holding them back?

Send comments to: kalindawalo2010@gmail.com

The Supreme Court of Zambia and its survival of the near capture: the episode of contempt of court

0

The Supreme Court of Zambia and its survival of the near capture: the episode of contempt of court

By Prof Munyonzwe Hamalengwa

The Supreme Court of Zambia celebrated its 50 years of existence in 2023.

Its history of survival through various challenges is yet to be written. As we celebrate 60 years of Zambia’s independence, many chapters of the survival of the Supreme Court in particular, the Constitutional Court also in particular and the judiciary in general, can be written. This article discusses one episode in 2019 when evidence, in my opinion, signalled or emerged that the Supreme Court of Zambia was tantalisingly close to being captured by the government of the day. The circumstantial evidence of this was the similarity in the language used by both the judiciary and political functionaries. They both used non-justice language of similar check-marks.

Let justice be done though the heavens may fall. Fiat justitia ruat caelum. This is a time-honoured maxim that the judiciary in dispensing justice should only be guided by the notions of justice as a self-contained vehicle and nothing more. Judges may not import “non-Justice” or extraneous considerations to inform them in their decisional trajectories. Judges should not fear any fall-out from their decisions as long as they are based on principles of justice.

A long time ago in 1740, Lord Mansfield, one of the greatest English Judges of all time, expressed “fiat justitia ruat caelum” this way: “I will not do that which my conscience tells me is wrong, upon this occasion; to gain the huzzas of thousands, or the daily praise of all the papers which come from the press. I will not avoid doing that which I think is right, though it should draw on me the whole artillery of libels; all that falsehood and malice can invent, or credulity of a deluded populace can swallow… Once for all, let it be understood that no endeavours of this kind will influence any man who at present sits here”.

This statement represents the hallmark of judicial independence and autonomy. It is a message for all judicial ages including ours. It is my considered view and opinion that the Supreme Court of Zambia violated the notion of “fiat justitia ruat caelum” on March 15th, 2019 by importing extraneous sentiments in its reasons for sentencing Bishop John Mambo for contempt of court. The court was quoted by the media as justifying in part the need to punish people who engaged in unwarranted criticism of the judiciary because unwarranted criticism of the judiciary as corrupt or whatever, would scare away foreign investors to the detriment of Zambia’s economy and at the sufferance of the Zambians. I have no doubt that many other justifications were given for the need to punish those who engage in unwarranted criticism of the judiciary but the media only picked centrally this notion of scaring away foreign investors as justifying judicial stance on the conundrum of contempt of court.

Since everybody knows that Zambians are not a reading culture, the majority of Zambians will only remain with what they had read in the headlines and what had been reported on ZNBC and other government owned or controlled public and private media. The equation will remain for the most part: unwarranted criticism of the judiciary equaled deprivation of foreign investment and therefore economic suffering of the people. Those who engaged in unwarranted criticism of the judiciary would then be targets of hate and ridicule because they were dangerous to the country, they were enemies of the people. This was because the Supreme Court of Zambia had so directed and reasoned, so a lot of people may have thought so from the summary of the decision by the media. Maybe less than one per cent of Zambians ever read the entire actual decision which was complex and legally grounded. But justifying in part the revulsion against unwarranted criticism of the judiciary on the basis that this would scare away foreign investment had nothing to do with the fulcrum and principles of justice upon which such momentous decisions must be anchored. This was a non-justice issue. Contempt of court is a self-contained vehicle and must be justified within its parameters.

It is my submission and opinion that such importation of extraneous non-justice matters by the Supreme Court of Zambia was and is dangerous to the rule of law and to the autonomy and independence of the judiciary in Zambia. This game was playing to the political gallery and to the “daily praise of all the papers which come from the press” paraphrasing Mansfield.

In the past, the then Economic Association of Zambia president Dr Lubinda Haabazoka, press aide to the President Amos Chanda and a few others had expressed the same exact views pertaining to the alleged effects on foreign investment flowing from unwarranted criticism on social media and by the then opposition to the government on alleged corruption and economic mismanagement. The Supreme Court of Zambia as reported by the media in part was parroting the exact same government sentiment, yet the Government of Zambia was not part of that litigation.

Justice P.D. Anin is quoted in part by then chief justice Ernest Sakala in his LLM Thesis entitled, “Autonomy and Independence of the Judiciary in Zambia: Realities and Challenges”(UNZA, 1999, pp. 283-4) as stating the following: “it is not generally true that in some of our countries that the judiciary are de facto independent of the Executive. On the contrary, the judiciary is regularly dictated to and badgered into following the dictates, whims and caprices of the Government or ruling single party.” The mirroring of government sentiments on foreign investments and the impact of alleged unwarranted criticism thereon, by judicial sentiments almost word for word could induce in a reasonable person the perception that there is cross-pollination and fertilisation between government and judicial agendas. Can you find a more perfect example than this one? Peruse the media on what the government had been saying on this topic at that time in 2018-2019, before and after and what the judiciary had said in the instant case!

After all, as every judge knows, perception can have a life of its own, independent of reality. “Justice must not only be done, it must also be seen to be done”. There are two realities in this sentence. People would lose confidence in the administration of justice and the judiciary if they perceive rightly or wrongly that the judiciary was imbibing and being fed from the well of the government. It just takes perception no matter how furthest it is from the truth. The perception can injure the reputation of the judiciary. People at the time had the widespread perception that the Zambian judiciary was not independent and autonomous, a perception that continues. When the judiciary parroted government sentiments like in the instant case, the judiciary self-supplied the self-evident perceived evidence.

That was, however, not all there was to this problem. Because the relationship between foreign investment and the effect on it by unwarranted criticism is not embedded in the principles of justice, there could never be any evidence to support the notion that unwarranted criticism of the judiciary affected or affects foreign investment. Where was and is the evidence? Where were and are the direct causal linkages in form of statistics?

On the contrary, foreign direct investments could be attracted to regimes drowning in corruption and lawlessness, where government officials and the judiciary could easily be bribed to issue permits and dispense justice based on the highest bidder in terms of settling litigation. There was and is more direct foreign investment in corrupt and lawless DRC than in Zambia. The Kenyan economy was booming in the 1980s and up to the early 2000s during the most corrupt judicial reign in Kenya’s history. There was a lot written about corruption in the Kenyan judiciary but investments flowed in Kenya at a dizzying rate. The lawless judiciary under apartheid never scared investments. Examples are legion rather than the other way round.

Withdrawal of donor monies in Zambia was not based on unwarranted criticism of the judiciary. It was based on outright evidence of government mis-use of the money. And donor money is different from direct foreign investment. Donor money can also still flow even in the face of unwarranted judicial criticism. The judiciary must be very careful in its use of judicial language. The judiciary must stay out of non-justice issues in their decisions. They must stick to the proven evidence before them. Political statements do not belong in the calculus of justice. The judiciary should not say anything that they cannot support. The judiciary must not import the language of politicians in their decisions lest they “draw ..the whole artillery of libels, all that falsehood and malice can invent, or the credulity of a deluded populace can swallow”, to paraphrase Lord Mansfied again.

To make matters worse, at his retirement celebration on March 18, 2019, Supreme Court of Zambia justice Marvin Mwanamwambwa reiterated the same sentiments as reported by the media as those reported in the Mambo sentencing of March 15, 2019. I am sure justice Mwanamwambwa said a lot more but the media reported that he emphasised that unwarranted criticism of the judiciary is anathema to foreign investment and Zambia’s economy or words to that effect. Criticism of the judiciary, warranted or unwarranted is a justice issue but foreign investment is not. And there is no evidence that judicial criticism, warranted or unwarranted affected or affects foreign investment in Zambia. Can anyone seriously believe that the Chinese are moved by notions of criticism on corruption basis of the Zambian judiciary or of any massive human rights abuses in any country they invest in? Would Trump care about judicial or political corruption in North Korea, Brazil, Venezuela or other countries?

The word “unwarranted” is also not without its problems. Who decides what is warranted or unwarranted? The issuer or recipient of the criticism? If it is the recipient, it is a subjective evaluation because anything he or she doesn’t like would be unwarranted. Retired justice at the time the acting chief justice Madam Lombe Chibesakunda stated in 2014 that there were elements of corruption in the Zambian judiciary. Was she issuing an unwarranted criticism? Did she have evidence in hand? Was and is the accusation of judicial corruption totally devoid of any air of reality? So, it is possible that what may be perceived as “unwarranted” could not be totally that. It may be warranted but maybe improperly deployed in certain instances where it does not fit but may actually fit if the totality of the canvass is taken into account.

In the case at bar and in all future cases, the Supreme Court of Zambia must stick to the principles of justice and only to the principles of justice. Let justice be done though the heavens may fall. This analysis applies to the Constitutional Court in particular and to the entire judicial hierarchies in general, now and in future and under all regimes now and in future.

The author teaches Criminal Law, Law of Evidence and Research and Writing Methodologies in Law. Email: munyonzwe.hamalengwa@zaou.ac.zm

Check Out The List Of The Five Richest Hip-Hop Artistes In The World

Some of the world’s richest Hip Hop artistes went from selling out arenas to releasing flashy visual imagery of music videos and owning record labels.

These moves showcase how some of the world’s most talented hip-hop artistes built massive fortunes both in and outside of their music careers.

Beyond their rap styles and lyrics, some of these top-class musicians have plenty of what they rap and boast about.

It’s also worth noting that most of these rich hip-hop artistes’ assets result from other business ventures.

In this article, we take a look at the richest hip-hop artistes in the world in 2024, according to CelebrityNetWorth.

Jay-Z: Net Worth$2.5 billion
Shawn Corey Carter, popularly known by his stage name Jay-Z, became hip-hop’s first billionaire in 2019.

It is worth noting that much of Jay-Z’s financial success comes from his multiple business ventures aside from music.

According to Celebrity Net Worth, Jay-Z is worth $2.5 billion and is the only musician among the top five celebrity billionaires named by Forbes.

P Diddy: Net Worth $600 million
Sean “Diddy” Combs is currently in the headlines following a barrage of sexual assault allegations.

In recent months, multiple women have come forward to share allegations of misconduct by the rap mogul. This includes an individual lawsuit filed by his ex-girlfriend Cassie, whom he dated on and off from 2007 to 2018.

Amid the ongoing legal proceedings of the embattled rapper, his massive fortune and big-ticket assets have received attention.

According to Forbes, Diddy was estimated to be worth USD 1 billion in 2022, but as of October 6, 2024, Celebrity Net Worth estimated Diddy’s net worth to be $600 million.

Dr. Dre: Net Worth $500 million
One of the most important faces in the rap industry is Dr. Dre, born Andre Romell Young.

He is one of the most significant figures in hip-hop and is said to be one of those to popularize ‘Gangsta rap’.

Dr. Dre is also known as the man who launched the careers of several famous rappers we know today.

His artistic influence and contribution as a producer in the American rap scene have been massive – dating back to his historic role as a member of the Californian hip-hop group N.W.A.

Kanye West (Ye): Net Worth $400 million
Touted as one of the most popular and controversial rappers of his time, Kanye West has earned his place among the richest rappers in the world via his music and fashion businesses.

Forbes estimated Kanye West’s net worth to be $2 billion as of 2022; however, Celebrity Net Worth has estimated his net worth at $400 million as of June 2024.

This is a result of the artiste seeing a major drop following the breakdown of the lucrative multi-year deal between his sneaker brand Yeezy and Adidas.

Eminem, Pharrell Williams, and Drake: Net Worth $250 million
These artistes are grouped due to their equal net worth of $250 million.

Eminem is one of the most streamed hip-hop artists on Spotify. Marshall Mathers LP, which has been certified a diamond by the RIAA.

Pharrell Williams is one rapper you need to take business lessons from. His achievements go beyond just creating and producing music and have contributed to his net worth of $250 million, a massive fortune.

Drake’s staggering net worth of USD 250 million is a sum of his music, tours, and business ventures, such as his fashion collaborations.

Mozambique election results being doctored – EU

0

lection observers working for the European Union (EU) say some voting results have been doctored in Mozambique, as unrest in the country continues to grow.

Thousands of people joined opposition protests on Monday that were called by independent presidential candidate Venâncio Mondlane.

He blames security forces for gunning down his lawyer Elvino Dias and another political official called Paulo Guambe in the same car last Friday – but they deny any wrongdoing.

Official results from the general election held on 9 October are due to announced by Friday.

Evidence has been found of “irregularities during counting and unjustified alteration of election results at polling station and district level”, said the EU observer mission in a statement on Tuesday.

It is now urging “the electoral bodies to conduct the tabulation process in a transparent and credible manner, ensuring the traceability of polling station results”.

Vote-buying, inflated voter rolls in strongholds of the governing Frelimo party and voter intimidation have all been reported by the US-based International Republican Institute, which also sent a multinational election observer mission to the southern African nation.

Mozambique’s national results are meant to be published on the electoral commission’s website for all to see, but last month the body said its website had suffered a cyber-attack. The website remains inactive.

Fifty-year-old presidential hopeful Venâncio Mondlane, who has the backing of f opposition party Podemos, has already claimed victory and alleges that the killing of his aides on Friday night was politically motivated.

“This was a crime committed by the defence and security forces. There’s no doubt about it. The special forces killed Elvino [Dias],” he has said.

Mondlane rallied people in cities across Mozambique to protest against the killings and against what he says is the theft of the election.

On Monday, police used live rounds, tear gas, armoured vehicles and police dogs to push back protesters from the site in the capital city Maputo where Dias and Guambe were shot dead.

Demonstrators also blocked roads with burning tyres and barricades.

Footage shows Mondlane, and journalists running for cover after shots were fired in their direction.

Across the cities of Maputo, Beira and Nampula, local media reported that there were multiple arrests and at least 16 people were wounded and taken to hospital.

Shops and businesses closed on Monday but began reopening their doors on Tuesday.

The funeral for Dias is set to take place on Wednesday. Mondlane has called for further protests on Thursday and Friday.

There is growing pressure on the Mozambican authorities to identify the killers and bring them to justice following strong condemnation from former Mozambican President Armando Guebuza, the UN, the US and the EU.

Celebrated Mozambican author Mia Couto has called the killings a “crime against the nation”.

Mozambique has only ever been governed by one party – Frelimo – which has ruled since independence from Portugal.

The country is guaranteed a new president because President Filipe Nyusi is stepping down after serving the two-term limit.

The Frelimo candidate is 47-year-old Daniel Chapo.

His rivals in this election are Mondlane, Ossufo Momade – the former rebel commander-turned-leader of the main opposition party Renamo – and Lutero Simango from the Mozambique Democratic Movement.

Jay-Z: A Look At Some Business Moves That Contributed To The Superstar’s $2.5B Net Worth

0

In 2019, Jay-Z became the first rapper to become a billionaire, but his wealth was built up over time through his music and a string of lucrative business ventures that brought him millions of dollars.

Investing in black businesses is one of the most remarkable things Jay-Z has done with his fortune.

CelebrityNetWorth estimates that Jay-Z is currently worth an incredible $2.5 billion.

From rapper to billionaire, Hov has his hands in many businesses that help him stay at the top.

In this article, we examine some of the major business moves that helped this Brooklyn rapper become a billionaire.

Record Label: Roc Nation
Jay-Z launched Roc Nation, an entertainment organization with divisions for sports, publishing, distribution, talent management, and record labels.

Among the label’s most prominent clientele in the entertainment and sports industries are Rihanna, Shakira, and Kyrie Irving, to name a few.

NFL Partnership
A $25 million deal between Roc Nation and the NFL was first disclosed in 2019.

Although Hov’s first contract was only set for five years, the NFL just declared that it will be extending it.

According to the agreement, Jay and his Roc Nation would serve as the official live music entertainment strategists for the football team.

Streaming Platform: Tidal Music Company
For $56 million, Jay-Z purchased Aspiro, a music streaming service started by a Swedish-Norwegian public corporation, in 2015.

Jay-Z was even supported by some well-known celebrities, including Jack White, Rihanna, Beyoncé, Kanye West, and Calvin Harris, to give musicians access to a streaming platform.

Eventually, in 2021, Jack Dorsey, the former CEO of Twitter, paid an estimated $297 million to acquire the streaming service.

Night Club: 40/40 Club
Because Jay-Z loves professional sports so much, he founded the 40/40 Club.

Its name comes from athletes who, in a single season, swiped forty bases and hit forty home runs.

At the start, the 40/40 Club debuted in New York City in 2003.

It later expanded to Atlantic City in 2005, Las Vegas in 2007, his hometown at Brooklyn’s Barclays Center in 2012, and Atlanta’s Hartsfield-Jackson International Airport in 2014.

This new 40/40 club in New York City opened a few months ago.

Cannabis Investment: Monogram and Flowhub
Jay-Z made his first foray into the cannabis industry in 2020 with the debut of Monogram and his investment in Flowhub in 2021.

Monogram is a vendor of flower and pre-rolled joints, whereas Flowhub specializes in cannabis software.

Jay not only owns his cannabis brand but also put $19 million into Flowhub, a cannabis payment startup.

Investment in Uber
Jay-Z made his first substantial investment in Uber. XXL claims that Hov invested $2 million in Uber in 2013.

It was one of Jay’s best business decisions to purchase shares in the ride-sharing app when it was just three years old and not nearly as successful as the multibillion-dollar corporation it is now.

Investments in Arts Works
“In 2013, Jay-Z paid more than $4 million for the painting “Mecca” by Jean-Michel Basquiat, demonstrating his major investment.

His blue-chip art collection, which is currently valued at over $70 million, has increased in value since then, with a particular emphasis on African American art icons, according to Yahoo Finance.

Investment in the Brooklyn Nets
According to Marca.com, Jay-Z purchased a minority investment in the Nets in 2003 when they were still based in New Jersey for about $1 million, or one-fifth of a stake.

Before the Brooklyn rapper left the Nets to make other investments, he and Beyoncé were regulars at the games for almost ten years.

Ace of Spades investment
2006 saw the debut of Armand de Brignac, also known as the Ace of Spades. Jay-Z first purchased the champagne brand in 2014, according to the Wooden Cork Blog.

Jay-Z was able to establish the brand as one of the most well-known in the history of champagne by leveraging his widespread industry recognition and public celebrity.

Other Investments By Marcy Venture Partners
Marcy Venture Partners, Jay-Z’s investment firm, has made investments in a number of digital startups, such as Bitski, an NFT marketplace, and sLABS, a company that develops spatial computing.

Real Estate Investment
The $200 million mansion that Jay-Z and his wife bought in 2023 is the most expensive house in California history.

Along with his wife Beyoncé, Jay-Z has substantial real estate holdings, with properties spread across several states.

Lee Hsien Yang, youngest son of Singapore founder, claims asylum in the UK

0

The youngest son of Singapore‘s late founding father has declared that he is now a political refugee in the United Kingdom, marking the latest development in the high-profile feud within the city-state’s most prominent family.

Lee Hsien Yang said on Tuesday that the UK government granted him asylum from what he described as “persecution” at home.

Lee and his sister Lee Wei Ling, who died on October 9, have for years been estranged from influential elder brother Lee Hsien Loong, who was prime minister for two decades until May this year. The rift centred around disagreements over the fate of their father’s home following his death in 2015.

The frayed relationship has played out publicly, with the younger Lee, 67, aligning himself with an opposition party during the 2020 election and last year saying he was considering running for the Singapore presidency, a largely ceremonial post.

In a Facebook post on Tuesday, Lee Hsien Yang said that he sought asylum in 2022 “as a last resort,” which the UK granted him in August.

“The Singapore government’s attacks against me are in the public record. They prosecuted my son, brought disciplinary proceedings against my wife, and launched a bogus police investigation that has dragged on for years,” he wrote, adding that he had been unable to return home for his sister’s funeral as a result.

“On the basis of these facts, the UK has determined that I face a well-founded risk of persecution and cannot safely return to Singapore.”

Singapore’s government said the persecution claim was baseless and unfounded, ChannelNewsAsia reported.

There was no immediate comment from the UK’s government.

‘Look more closely’

The Guardian published an interview with Lee Hsien Yang on Tuesday in which he strongly criticised the Singapore government and alleged it facilitated money laundering.

“There is a need for the world to look more closely, to see Singapore’s role as that key facilitator for arms trades, for dirty money, for drug monies, crypto money,” the newspaper quoted him as saying.

The Singapore government said in a statement that there was no basis to the allegations in the Guardian’s report. The city-state has a “robust system to deter and tackle money laundering and other illicit financial flows, which is consistent with international standards,” it said.

Lee Hsien Yang and his sister, Lee Wei Ling, have accused their eldest brother of abusing his power to stop them from demolishing the family home according to the wishes of their father, who died in 2015 after leading Singapore for more than three decades.

Lee Hsien Loong thought it should be up to the government to decide what to do with it, including potentially retaining it as a heritage landmark.

The elder Lee remains in the cabinet in the post of senior minister, a role also held by his father, who from 1959 to 1990 oversaw the city-state’s rapid rise from a British colonial backwater to a global trade and financial centre.

Gerard Pique accuses Shakira of not being fully truthful about their break

Former Spanish footballer, Gerard Pique has accused Shakira of not being fully truthful about their break-up.

The Colombian singer, 47, announced that she was breaking up with the former Barcelona star in June 2022 amid rumours of him cheating after 11 years and two children together.

Shakira has since taken several shots at Pique in her music over their ugly split.

Pique, 37, who is now dating 25-year-old Clara Chia Marti, has insisted he is ‘very happy’. Shakira has fired shots at the new girlfriend as well.

Gerard Pique accuses Shakira of not being fully truthful about their break-up, says he
‘In the end, the truth or what happens or occurs is not told in the way it was. I cannot control this,’ Pique told CNN, via AS.

‘The best thing is that in the end I am surrounded by my loved ones, my family, my friends, the people who really know you. They know what you are like and what you do, and that gives me a lot of peace of mind.

‘I am very happy, I have a great time and I feel privileged. The life I have had, being able to play for the club of my life for more than twenty years, wonderful children, an incredible family, lifelong friends, those from school that I still have.’

Pique and Shakira have two sons together, Milan, 11, and Sasha, nine.

In 2022, Spanish outlet El Periodico reported that the couple had been living separately for a few weeks after Pique was kicked out of the family home by the pop star.

There was a theory that Shakira uncovered his alleged cheating by discovering that a jar of strawberry jam in their home together had been eaten while she was away. Shakira was reportedly the only strawberry jam eater in the relationship.

However, the South American singer has since debunked the theory.

In the summer of 2023, Pique reportedly moved in with Clara Chia- in the home he had shared with Shakira when she first moved to Barcelona.

In January 2023, video footage emerged which is said to show Gerard’s new girlfriend in the footballer’s family home before his split from Shakira.

Shakira was reportedly left ‘devastated’ at the unearthed footage from August 2021, which was recorded ten months before she announced she had split from her partner of 11 years.

UN ‘deeply concerned’ Kenya returned Turkish refugees

0

The UN’s refugee agency (UNHCR) has said it is “deeply concerned” by news that four refugees were returned to Turkey from Kenya.

The four were repatriated at the request of the Turkish government, Kenya’s foreign ministry said.

The statement comes after reports of several people being abducted in the capital, Nairobi, on Friday.

A British national told the BBC he and several Turkish citizens had been kidnapped by masked men.

He said he had been released after eight hours when he showed his alleged abductors a copy of his British passport.

In a statement the UNHCR said it “urges the Government of Kenya to abide by their international legal obligations, and in particular, to respect the principle of non-refoulment [forced return of refugees], which protects asylum-seekers and refugees from any measure that could lead to their removal to a place where their life or freedom would be threatened”.

Kenya’s foreign ministry said it had agreed to Turkey’s request to repatriate the four men because of the country’s “robust historical and strategic relations” with Turkey, and that it had been assured the refugees would be “treated with dignity”.

The four are believed to be followers of the Gulen movement, a powerful Islamic community with followers in Turkey and worldwide, whose leader has just died.

The Gulen movement runs a network of schools in Kenya and around the world.

Known as Hizmet or “service” in Turkey, it was blamed for a 2016 coup attempt and later declared a terrorist organisation.

Turkish authorities have not yet commented on the repatriation.

Under the UN’s 1951 Refugee Convention, refugees should not be returned to a country where they face serious threats to their life or freedom.

Following the reported abduction, Kenyan law firm Mukele & Kakai said it was acting on behalf of four men who were registered refugees and warned airlines against allowing them to be taken on board.

In a letter seen by the BBC, it described them as “victims of political victimisation”.

The Kenyan government said it had “unswerving commitment to the protection and promotion of refugee rights” and was “committed to the privacy and confidentiality of the repatriated individuals”.

The British national, Necdet Seyitoğlu, told the BBC six other people he knew – all Turkish citizens – were also abducted in the same manner from different locations in Nairobi.

In a statement, the UK Foreign Office said it was “providing consular support to a British man and his family following an incident in Kenya”.

Following reports of the kidnapping, Kenyan police told the BBC they were investigating a “kidnapping incident” after a motorcycle driver witnessed the abduction.

According to the report, two vehicles intercepted and blocked a silver saloon car with two occupants from the front and behind.

“About eight persons armed with weapons emerged from the two vehicles, pulled out the two occupants” and drove off with them, said police spokeswoman Resila Onyango.

However, Amnesty International’s Kenya spokesman said he was “deeply concerned by reports that seven asylum seekers from Türkiye have been abducted on Kenyan soil”.

The UNHCR told the BBC it was “aware of reports and will provide more information once we have it”.

Turkey’s relationships with African countries has grown over the past 20 years, with President Recep Tayyip Erdogan seeking to strengthen ties.

But Kenya’s close ties with Turkey go even further back.

In 1999, Kurdish separatist leader Abdullah Öcalan was apprehended by Turkish forces in the country and taken back home where he was put on trial, and later convicted, for treason.

Hon Dr Chitalu CHILUFYA   is  an opportunist on the look out to eat from the serving Govt- PF

0

LUAPULA PROVINCE PATRIOTIC FRONT PROVINCIAL CHAIRPERSON STATEMENT OVER MISCONDUCT OF HON DR CHITALU CHILUFYA AND HON DR SIMON MWALE, MPs FOR MANSA CENTRAL CONSTITUENCY AND NCHELENGE CONSTITUENCY RESPECTIVELY
.
….The two Parliamentarians have benefited from the PF, and have turned around against the party that gave them support, more especially Hon Dr Chitalu CHILUFYA who at one time was appointed as Minister of Health by President Dr Edgar Chagwa Lungu when PF was in Government….

As PF Provincial Chairperson for Luapula Province, I want to condemn the behavior of Hon Dr Chitalu CHILUFYA, MP for Mansa Central Constituency and Hon Dr Simon MWALE, . MP for Nchelenge Constituency, who has accompanied President HH of the UPND when he went to the Southern Province in Mazabuka for Zambia Sugar Company celebrations.



These two Parliamentarians are giving support to HH whilst they were given the mandate to serve the people of Luapula Province in their respective constituencies under the PATRIOTIC FRONT ticket. I am therefore, disappointed by their actions and have violated the party constitution, which demands the two to face disciplinary actions.

The two Parliamentarians have benefited from the PF, and have turned around against the party that gave them support, more especially Hon Dr Chitalu CHILUFYA who at one time was appointed as Minister of Health by President Dr Edgar Chagwa Lungu when PF was in Government. The two Parliamentarians have disappointed the party President Dr ECL who had confidence in them when they were adopted and given these important positions, they have thrown back insults at our party which made them to be what they are right now.

I am not surprised that Hon Dr CHILUFYA can behave in such a manner because even when he came to PF, he defected from MMD and he has moved to the ruling UPND, he is portraying himself to be an opportunist on the look out to eat from the serving Government.

PHOTO: Leader of the opposition Robert Chabinga, Mansa PF Member of Parliament and former Minister of Health Chitalu Chilufya and Nchelenge PF member of Parliament Mwale listening on as President Hakainde Hichilema addresses Mazabuka UPND members and residents today.



I want to ask the remaining PF Members of Parliament, Councilors and the entire party Membership to remain steadfast and focused, let’s continue rallying behind under the good, strong and able leadership of our Party President Dr Edgar Chagwa Lungu, even as we are looking forward to 2026 and get back into Government if we work hard.

MUSUNGA Francis
Provincial Chairperson
PATRIOTIC FRONT
Luapula Province.
MANSA.

Teacher escapes punishment after having s333x with 17year old pupil

0

Teacher escapes punishment after having sex with 17year old pupil

A MAGISTRATE has described the Education Act as a joke, which has entrusted young girls to “cannibal” male teachers.

Magistrate Chrisantos Chandi made the observation following a case in which a 31-year-old teacher of Ndola has been acquitted of raping his 17-year-old pupil after establishing that the two were in an intimate relationship.

Davies Mukuka, 31, a teacher of history at Ndola Girls Technical School, was charged with rape.

It was alleged that on October 28 last year, Mukuka had unlawful carnal knowledge of the 17-year-old girl without her consent.

In her testimony, the girl alleged that she was raped by the teacher when she went to his office to make a phone call to her mother.

“I am a pupil in Grade 12. I know the man, he was my history teacher last year,” she said. “I am a boarder. About 20:00 hours I went to his office to call my mother on his phone [when he allegedly raped her].”

Ndola Teaching Hospital gynaecologist and obstetrician Rashidi Nchimunya also told court after he examined the child following allegations of rape and his conclusion was that the hymen was intact.

“The hymen was intact, no vaginal lacerations, the virginal hole was bigger than normal,” he said.

“The conclusion was that the hymen was intact and we maintained suspected defilement.”

And when the matter came up on case to answer, magistrate Chandi noted that there was a relationship between Mukuka and the pupil.

“The defence introduced a diary memo written by the prosecutrix which was signed and endorsed by both the accused and the prosecutrix showing a relationship quite intimate to dispute between the two,” he said.

“I have come to the conclusion that the story of rape was made up as it is clear that the accused did not rape the prosecutrix.”

Magistrate Chandi further noted that upon reviewing the Education Act, he found it to be a joke.

“The court looked at the Education Act and found it as a joke that we entrust our girls to cannibal male teachers and all there is in the Act is a disciplinary process that borders on ethics without criminal sanctions,” he said.

“Teachers cannot be sleeping with their children.” Magistrate Chandi said schools must be made safe for girls and urged the district education board and school administrations to take matters concerning the safety of girls seriously

Why the Zambian side of the Victoria falls is very dry but water is still flowing on the Zimbabwean side?

WHY ZAMBIA SIDE OF FALLS IS DRY

Why does Zambian side of the Victoria Falls become dry during this period?

The Zambian side of the Victoria falls, falls very dry but water can be seen still flowing on the Zimbabwean side.

The Zambian side of the falls hosts a 110 megawatts hydro electric power station built way back in 1936.

The Victoria Falls Power Station is located in the third gorge below Victoria Falls and consists of three power stations with a total capacity of 108 megawattssaw expansions in phases—1938, 1969, and 1972—boosting to its current installed capacity of 108 MW.

At the request of the Colonial Government great care was taken to avoid spoiling the beauty of the Falls.

The water inlet is some distance above the Falls and an underground pipe-line leads to the top of a gorge some distance below them.

An overhead power cable was necessary in one place, but it was put as far from the Falls as possible and it will not be seen by tourists.
It was calculated that even in the dry season the quantity of water taken by the Power Station should be negligible in comparison with the total flow over the Falls.

A lot of people have been wondering why the Zambian side of the Victoria falls is very dry but water is still flowing on the Zimbabwean side. Some people have even been asking for spiritual intervention through prayers. This picture explains the reason why. On the Zambian side of the falls a hydro electric power station was constructed way back in the colonials days and the terrain was interfered with to an extent when it’s dry period the water is diverted to the power station for electricity generation whilst on the Zimbabwean side the remaining water still flows freely down the falls. The arrows on the picture indicate the location of the hydro power plant and the subsequent dryness on the Zambia side caused by this water diversion. (Beaurriful Zambia) C: N. Shabolyo

HH is not strong neither is he superior technically, but he is wiping our asses like mules in many ways, cries Chilufya Tayali

By EEP President Chilufya Tayali

I AM SCARED OF SAYING THE TRUTH FROM MY POINT OF VIEW

Where are our scores against our foes? What is the goal aggregate, so far? I feel so frustrated because we are being beaten by a weak champion.

President Hakainde is not strong neither is he superior technically, but he is wiping our asses like mules in many ways.

Looking at what has happened so far, I am scared of what is coming. Sometimes I tend to wonder if some of my friends know what’s coming against them.

Do my friends like Brian Mundubile know that, they might be out of Parliament soon? Do they think the courts will keep them in Parliament (the nine MPs).

Haven’t these guys learned lessons from Bowman and Malanji?

Emerine Kabanshi, Chitotela, Chilangwa and GBM are in prison, does Malanji, and many of those appearing in court, expect their cases to go any other way?

Kampyongo’s wife is in prison, does BaLungu think BaEsther will be spared?

About 7 judges have been removed by President Hichilema, does anyone think other Judges will dare rule against the State? If ConCourt Judges can easily be removed, what about small magistrates and other junior Judges.

How naive can one be, to expect anything other than what Hakainde wants, from the ConCourt over the eligibility case?

We are having by-elections in Kawambwa and with the PF not making efforts to fight, does anyone think UPND will hesitate to declare Chawama, Petauke Central, Kawambwa and other seats vacant?

You see, you accuse me of being a flip-flop, but I am just a realist, who look at what is before me, as it is, for what it is and say it as it is.

This is why these few days, I have been quiet, because what I have to say, my friends might not like it. Unfortunately, I depend on some of these friends in many ways.

You know…., sometimes people don’t want to hear the truth, but I am not a pretentious person. I don’t want to sing praise when we are sunk deep in the hole of mud.

Some people are banking on the public to rise, yet President Lungu is being chased out of Chingola like a small boy, as they did to me. At least for me, I even managed to interact with cadres and they safely escorted me out the town.

It’s not President Hichilema is strong or strategic, it’s just that he has no opposition to put him under pressure. He is having it easy in all his unconstitutional and barbaric actions.

President Hichilema can decide to do anything at the moment, including arresting Edgar Lungu, if he so wishes, and it can happen. Who ever imagined the a former first lady would be detailed while the former President is watching?

Anyway, mwikalipa bane pafyo nalanda (don’t be upset over what I have said) I have not turned against you, I just wanted people to know why I am reluctant to talk.

I am just worried, besides mwalileka nokuntuminako ka ngwee so ubuchushi nabo bulipamushi. I am worried, if we are wiped out, how will I survive? I want to come back home sooner than later.

TAYALI THE PUBLIC LAWYER OF THE PUBLIC COURT OF OPINIONS!!!

PRESIDENT HAKAINDE HICHILEMA HAS EITHER LOST CONTROL OVER HIS CADRES OR HE IS TOLERATING THEM

0

PRESIDENT HAKAINDE HICHILEMA HAS EITHER LOST CONTROL OVER HIS CADRES OR HE IS TOLERATING THEM- Lusaka Lawyer

By Lusaka Lawyer Celestine Mambula Mukandila

An Audio circulating on social media made by Former Nchanga MP Hon.  Richard Kazala who is also former Deputy Minister of Sports who narrated the awful UPND behaviour at the Kambwili’s funeral where UPND cadres urinated on funeral food and brought down tents makes sad reading.  



It has now become very apparent that President Hakainde Hichilema has either lost control of his unruly cadres or he is in fact supporting the trauma and torment that these cadres have placed on society today. 

The same cadres now appear to be more powerful than the police that they break the law in daylight and in full view of the police. 

The former Deputy Minister narrated just how President Lungu left the district discreetly so as to avoid a situation of retaliation by his supporters. 

Today, yet again, we have seen Chingola Business Man by the name of Mr. Kabaso Mulenga popularly known as “Spax Mining” complaining of the trauma and barbarism of the UPND cadres on his business premises or private property.

Barely, a fortnight ago, we saw a youth in Matero by the name of Joseph Daka who was allegedly murdered by suspected UPND cadres and left in the hands of the police to consequently die in police custody. 

The amount of trauma place on society today by UPND Cadres is unprecedented and can’t even be compared to the behavior of PF Cadres as they then were in power.

President Hakainde must know that these individuals causing havoc and trauma to society today are known people who appear to be above the law. 

The respect for the rule of law in the New Dawn Regime appears to only exist in President Hakainde Hichilema’s fiction of his own imagination as his cadres are seen to clearly defy the rule of law and abuse the police.

This is a clear show of the breakdown of the rule of law in this country right under President Hakainde Hichilema’s nose.

I cry for mother Zambia, that UPND cadres have now become the ALFA AND OMEGA and go out to break the law in full view of the police and life goes on.  Not even President Hakainde or his Inspector General of Police has issued a statement on the unfortunate events that endangered the life of the Former President. 

If President Hakainde’s cadres cannot respect President Edgar LUNGU as a person, it’s imperative to remind our colleagues that he is Zambia’s Sixth Republican President and his office must be respected without compromise.  He remains a Government Trophy and must, if anything, be accorded the protection required of his privileged status.

Maybe President Hakainde Hichilema must tell the Zambian people if at all there is any other power InCharge of our country other than himself, that his Cadres can appear not to speak the same language as himself. 

May we please NOT allow this to continue and respect the Law. 

#RespectTheLaw
#mukandila_nabakwe73