When Tongue in Cheek Tribal Insinuations, Hatred, and Deception is Promoted and encouraged by a Head of State- Muhabi Lungu

13

Muhabi Lungu

When Tongue in Cheek Tribal Insinuations, Hatred, and Deception is Promoted and encouraged by a Head of State.



A FIVE  CHAPTER  SERIES BY  MUHABI LUNGU

Chapter One (i)

One week ago today, On 24th June 2025, on the same day that the Zambian  State filed an inadvisable court injunction in South Africa, primarily in order to punish the  *Widow* and *Family* of his main, deceased rival, ( my opinion), our ‘unassailable’ President also decided to hold several meetings of self justification. Among the organizations met  were the United Church of Zambia (UCZ) Executive and a large group of Civil Society Organizations (CSOs).



In both of these meetings, President HH seemed preoccupied with painting himself as a victim of some “hate’ conspiracy;  that all the other Presidents before him were not strongly opposed, when they attempted or  changed the republican constitution. That Kenneth Kaunda (KK) and Fredrick Chiluba ( FTJ)  both changed the constitution, a  year before elections and that neither of them were opposed nor had any “hatred” shown to them



In the meeting with CSOs, in particular, our ‘infallible’ President complained about being **hated* ; that he could “feel it and touch it”, while twiddling his fingers to indicate its heart felt texture and the proximity of this “hate”to him.  Guarded though he may have been, the implicit tribal  connection of this “hatred,” was as palpable as his explicit verbalization on this matter, on countless other times over the course of the last few years.



The implicit connection between hate and ethnicity was unquestionably clear to a great majority of listeners; people who have since  publicly shared their shock and disappointment. Of course,  he and all of his supporters will profusely deny it and accuse all of us of precisely providing the evidence to his point *that* *we* ” *hate* ” *him* . However, this complaint of “hatred” and  victimization is not new. It has been expressed on several occasions, by the President, over time and with  less guardedness.



At a mammoth rally held in Kalomo on 21st  May 2025, while campaigning and   referring to himself as  “Sirakainde”,  the President declared that he ” held the keys to power”  and that he was ” *permanently* *seated* *to* *the* *thrown* *of* *that* *power* ” and that no one was going to remove him; “that the leadership was theirs and that they should not allow it to be taken away from them.” There can be no denial as to what was being requested for here.



This tongue in cheek subliminal tribal rallying call, deceives no one. Both for those whom the message is intended for  and for those whom it is not. We are  all able to fully understand what is being communicated and what is being solicited. In this recent case of last week,  the exact words of the President were as follows and I quote…



“I have come to notice that in this country, *a* *guy* *like* *me* , is always viewed to be malicious and assessed differently from Presidents before me. Do you want me to justify it? ….YES, there wasn’t this sort of hatred that I can touch, I can feel, because it is HH. It is this animal pariah we don’t like. Why else don’t you like your fellow citizen? *What* *is* *the* *issue* *?*”, He asked.



Of course the insinuation and import of his questions were very clear to me and to most honest observers. Upon seeing and hearing this, I cringed and gnashed my teeth. Subsequently, I genuinely felt injured, insulted and disturbed that a Head of State can use such strong accusatory words, in public, against the Zambian people and in order to claim victimization and sympathy for purposes of casting evil intent on the fundamental right towards his power being  checked and balanced. That he can publicly and manipulatively ask rhetorical questions, ostensibly designed to elicit leading and suggestive answers; responses which by themselves may promote suggestive defensive “hatred”. Incredibly frightening.



What does he mean by  “a guy like me?” Is he suggesting that ” *a*  *guy* *like* *me* ,” whatever that means, is  above  legitimate criticism. Is he suggesting that  we are  not to express any  objections against his bad governance style;  because he is somehow special as opposed to those other presidents who previously held the office? Is he demanding that his  poor judgement of human relations be exempt from criticism because of some peculiar and unstated condition?



In an analysis of his perspective and in answer to my questions, I will, over the next week, attempt to unpack what I understand his intentions  to be, by saying what he said. What is the possible value and strategy in his  accusation of  “hatred”, apparently directed to him  by his  critics.



Let me first begin by evaluating the truthfulness of his statement regarding the lack of strong  opposition voices in previous constitutional amendments.

*Luck* *of* *Hatred* *in* *Previous* *Constitutional* *Amendments* *from* *1973- 2021* .



Let me raise my very strong objection to this *low* , *down,* *dirty* *and* *shameful* *telling* *of* *a* *lie* , ( unworthy to be uttered by a President) that there were no voices of strong decent and objection or active opposition  forthcoming, by anybody, during constitutional reforms or changes in 1973, 1990, 1996, 2001, 2016 and 2021.



Secondly, I have noticed a dangerous trend in our country, over the last few years, in which expressing an opposing view or  strongly disagreeing with someone’s  bad behavior is  equivalent to “hate.” Clearly, the Head of State believes in the principle that opposing his ideas and actions is hatred. He has firmly stated it so. This belief, now frequently repeated by his followers is not only inimical to democracy but very dangerous and retrogressive towards societal progress. It is the stuff by which dictators are born. Those who want to remain permanently gulued to a seat for which there is no constitutional permanency.



Nevertheless, let me categorically state that the accusation of former Presidents not having been opposed,  is either a blatant and deliberate falsehood or grave ignorance of our collective  history by its current Head of State. Either way, it is  unacceptable dishonesty and disrespect to all of us, to all of the numerous  people who risked their jobs, reputations and lives to openly oppose KK, Chiluba and Lungu in their various attempts at changing the constitution.



There can be no dispute or selective memory  loss to that fact that aggressive opposition was always  the case, in all instances in which constitutional amendments did not  originate  from popular demand. The opposition was  loud,  actively voiced, demonstrations held, court actions taken and international lobbing openly pursued. The activities of opposition were in fact so visible and noisy that only a blind and deaf individual could have failed to pick them up.



Only a totally detached individual or a deceitful person can claim ignorance of these events. People who have constantly opposed Constitutional  Manipulation, such as Sakwiba Sikota, John Sangwa, Brebnar Changala, Fred M’membe, Lucy Sichone, Fr. Umberto Davoli, Michael Musonda and Samuel Mulafulafu. Catholic clergy such as Fr. Joe Komakoma, Fr. Miya, Fr. Peter Henriot and  many other extra ordinary  as well as ordinary Zambians  too numerous to mention. Many of  these individuals are still here to tell the story and have been fighting  in opposition to all other Presidents since 1991.



In my personal case, I have been insulted, beaten by the police, tear gassed, arrested and jailed, charged with  Treason and Murder, for opposing many of these infractions. My unyielding opposition to contrived manipulation and looming dictatorial tendencies even have  contributed to my father, Mkhondo Lungu being unceremoniously fired from being Chief of Protocall and Permanent Secretary.



If HH is ahistorical and if his advisors do not have the courage and decency to put the record straight, in order to encourage him apologize to all those his offensive statement has injured, let me attempt to school him.

This I shall do in the next chapter (ii) to be released on Thursday 3rd of July 2025.

– End of Chapter One (I) .

13 COMMENTS

  1. I remember how people rose against Dr Kenneth Kaunda…the powerful Student Movement led by UNZASU President General Ben Chilufya, the Trade Union Movement, and the general population…the riots of 1986 and 1988.
    I remember how we, as UNZA Students then , marched through Katima Mulilo, Saddam Hussein Boulevard, Cairo Road demanding the return to Multi Party Democracy.
    Until Dr Kenneth Kaunda had to repeal Article 4 of the Zambia Constitution to usher in the Third Republic…and indeed in 1991 the MMD won a landslide and Fredrick Chiluba was to become the 2nd Republican President. Dr Kenneth Kaunda didn’t claim hatred, envy or bitterness as the reasons he was removed from power.
    Dr Frederick Chiluba wanted to change the Constitution in 1998 so that he can have a third Term, and people from all walks of life rose up against him, and his Imingalato fell flat ..He was brought to a Stand still. The Oasis Forum, the church, students and the people resisted. He had to give power to Dr Levy Mwanawasa.
    Dr Chiluba didn’t claim bitterness, hatred, envy as the reasons for resisting change.

    The same can be said for other Presidents!

    Enter Mr Hakainde Hichilema, boy oh boy, it’s hatred, bitterness, envy, you name it. Everyone who criticizes him is driven by Hate, envy or bitterness.
    Bwafya!

    • You thieves hate HH we know that.Imagine writing a long story which carries nothing but hatred for HH.What do we call that if not hatred.What is wrong telling people that they hate him? The people who voted for him do love him by the way. We don’t care cause this time around we are going to double the votes.

      • My Friend am no thief..Am a Zambian Citizen with full rights as enshrined in our Constitution…And when I see a Mingalatoon abusing state institutions, destroying our multi party democracy which I fought so much for, which I sacrificed so much for, when I see democracy being turned upside down, daily arrests of opposition party Leaders, when I see the abuse of the Legislature and Judiciary, stealthy manoeuvres on delimitation, on constitutional amendment, when I see people being hounded out of offices on the basis of Tribe, the misadventures at the Registrar of Societies, the mistreatment of the 6 th President – the grinding of his face
        My friend I react, and the Mingalatoon doesn’t share the ideals I believe in, he goes in 2026.
        It’s not out of Hatred, Bitterness or
        Envy, his values don’t ascribe to the tenets of the Republic, our multi party democracy…and the ideals of Zambia.

  2. BUT I wonder why?? Somebody was IMPRISONED MORE THAN any other president in History. Can’t he HONESTLY SAY THAT HE was persecuted MORE THAN ANYONE ELSE???
    Muhabi should know that that’s were the difference is

    HH is 100% RIGHT.

    • @Anderson
      An opposition party Leader , not National President, who didn’t recognize the President of the Republic. Who thought he was above the law, could have illegal assemblies anywhere , and even had the audacity to block Presidential Motorcade.

    • Are you also an elder at Freemason bosses? Do you also wear white gloves? Are you obsessed with dead bodies?

      Your loyalty to yours in truly admirable. Others should follow suit and show the same loyalty to theirs.

      VOTE FOR CHANGE IN 2026.

  3. Mr Muhabi is just blind folding himself in this matter.What is good for goose is good for the gander.The PF so the importance of putting to rest Dr Kaunda in Embassy Park what is wrong if Dr Chagwa Lungu is put to rest at the same Embassy Park.Why shift the goal post positions.And blaming HH is just rigmarole.You know what is right but you just want waste time by doing unnecessary politics.We advised people about the retirement of Lungu they didn’t want to listen.We are again advising you to let Mrs Lungu rest she has over mourned she must come back to Zambia to put to rest Mr Lungu.

  4. @HaaIndigo Tyrol, LUNGU was a a weak leader. He used to hide in Cadres. Just imagine HH and LUNGU were government employees. They DIFFERED and LUNGU took it PERSONAL.

    GUYS let’s be mature as we take on take OATH OF HIGHEST OFFICE.

    ECL was IMMATURE!! Who cares we don’t even want to attend to his funeral!!

  5. Muhabi is all about hate for the man currently holding the presidency stemming from Lungu’s bold statements: “Nkamukaka! HH (No Tonga) will never be president!” Lungu being praised for handing over power peacefully was just acting according to statutory requirement otherwise have we followed why statesmen Rupiah Banda and Obasanjo came into the mix when Lungu lost the elections? The thinking of many “enlightened” Zambians some of whom have served in governance administrations is alarming and mediocre! I’m tired of incoherence in the media from the same sources pretending to be sensible! I’m afraid social media has obliterated balanced analytical journalism

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here