Home Blog Page 1176

EXPOSED: The secret behind mealie meal shortages revealed, govt hiding facts

0

As the nation continues to face critical shortages of mealie meal, it has come out that the government is not telling the citizens the truth about the grain situation in the country, reports Zambian Eye Correspondent.

According to the World Food Programme WFP, the drought conditions have resulted in significant crop losses and poor harvests in the last farming season. This has led to shortage of grain in the country, but this is contrary to the official version from the government.

Meanwhile the state is maintaining that the country has enough reserves, alleging that the shortages are artificial orchestrated by economic saboteurs.

However, the facts on the ground do not support the state’s version. The government has since come under fire from various sections of the society who are demanding to know the truth.

Commenting on the matter National Democratic Congress leader, Chisimba Kambwili, said the government had not been honest regarding the issue of mealie meal shortages; “From November when the price of mealie-meal started going up, we were made to believe that it was temporary and that the price will come down.

“All those in government, including the President, [Lusaka Province minister Bowman] Lusambo, Minister of Agriculture [Michael Katambo] have been issuing statements continually that the price of mealie-meal will come down but to the contrary what we are seeing is that the price of mealie-meal has continued to go up,”

According to humanitarian experts the government is dilly-dallying on the matter pretending that everything is fine, and not admitting the truth of the matter.
WFP states : “The Zambian Government has refused to declare hunger as a national disaster despite calls from the international community and opposition leaders.”
This refusal by the government to declare it a state of emergency has negative implications in that the international aid community may not chip in at the right time.
Warnings that Zambia is on the verge of hunger have been given countless times by different organizations and individuals, but the government is declining to admit.
Caritas warned that Zambia is facing one of its worst droughts in decades and that 2.3 million people are in urgent need of help.

Apparently, Minister in the Office of the Vice President Olipa Phiri recently confessed that about 2.3 million people have been affected by the drought that dogged the country last year.

The minister said this during a visit to the Copperbelt recently where donations from well wishers meant for the flood affected victims were being handed out.

Assorted food items worth K1.1 million were donated to the vulnerable people of Kabushi Constituency by the Kabushi Entrepreneurship and Vocational Training Centre (KEVTC) in collaboration with the Disaster Management Mitigation Unit (DMMU).

On the same note, in May 2019, the Minister of Agriculture Micheal Katambo, said the country had enough maize stocks for both human consumption and industrial supplies. But, few days later he back tracked and confessed to a local radio station that the country was facing maize shortages.

In November the same year, President Edgar Lungu also confessed that the agriculture sector had been negatively affected by climate change effects, drought, floods, and outbreaks of pests and diseases. He admitted that as a result the production of crops, in particular Zambia’s staple crop maize declined. -Zambian Eye

Hichilema’s track record on Constitution reform not inspiring – Isaac Mwanza

0

The Young African Leaders Initiative (YALI) has cautioned the public in their commendation of UPND and it’s leader Hakainde Hichilema in their role to provide checks and balances which have enabled Government, through Cabinet, to respond and propose amendments to Constitution of Zambia Amendment Bill.

During a media briefing on Saturday, YALI Governance and Legal Advisor, Isaac Mwanza, said the history of the UPND under Mr. Hichilema is to never support the constitution-making process, including the process they participated in 2010 and later collapsed in 2011.

“What remains to be seen is whether Mr. Hichilema will now provide leadership to his party MPs to support amendments which the Government intends to propose on the floor of the House. We are cautiously optimistic that he shall do so, bearing the history,” said Mr. Mwanza

He charged that Mr. Hichilema would not want anyone to take credit for enacting a Constitution which would allow youths, women, and persons living with disabilities to be represented in decision making and yet that has been a call these marginalized groups have been sounding for decades.

“The UPND and its MPs must remember that cleaning up this Bill and enacting it into law will ensure we have 30 days to hear a presidential petition in 2021 and beyond for any party that may be aggrieved after elections.”

He said Bill 10 must bring sanity into the Councils where Members of Parliament should have a say in managing developmental projects and making bye-laws that affect their people.

YALI has commended Cabinet for making a Government position known as regards public recommendations to amend the Constitution of Zambia Amendment Bill No. 10 of 2019.

“We believe the gesture by the government is a sign that it has been listening to this debate from those like us who crafted and supported Bill 10 and those who have been against certain provisions of Bill No. 10”

YALI has to join Government in commending voices who spoke against the Bill and those who championed for its current provisions.

“Our call is for UPND MPs and it’s leaders to show sobriety and participate in the process that must help the nation move forward. Our constitution is not perfect and there is no perfect constitution around the world. This is why Constitutions, even the oldest Constitution in the world, has undergone amendments until the 1990s,” he said.

Prophet Bushiri accused of running a cult in South Africa

0

PRETORIA-(MaraviPost)-They prostrated themselves on the tarmac, tears streaming down their faces, their hands in the air, chanting, proclaiming, begging and pleading.

“I want my daddy,” one congregant cried out. “I am here to fight for my father, Major 1, who rose my father from death,” declared another outside the Specialised Commercial Crimes Court in Pretoria last Friday.

To outsiders, the mass outpouring of support for self-proclaimed prophet Shepherd Bushiri (35) from followers of the Enlightened Christian Gathering appeared fanatical.

After all, he and his wife Mary had been arrested on charges of fraud, money laundering and contravening the Prevention of Organised Crime Act.

Last week, many people labelled the church a cult. But is it?

Eugene Botha, a specialist in theology and religion, says: “A cult is a countercultural or religious institution that lays claim to having a special knowledge that normal culture or religion does not. They find that current culture or religion is flawed and so create this alternative reality that they understand the world through. Often, the leader will claim that they are directly connected to God or, in some instances, that they are Jesus himself.”

Botha, a former professor of theology and religious studies, says it is this connection Bushiri’s followers yearn for, but the Enlightened Christian Gathering is not, he says, a full-blown cult.

“In a cult, adherents are supposed to extract themselves completely from society and normal life. It becomes a new family for them. Bushiri doesn’t command a full-blown cult because his drive is not just religion, but making money,” he says.

“Also, he doesn’t live with his followers. In real cults, leaders create their own communities that pit themselves against the rest of the world.”

In an article in the Stellenbosch Theological Journal in 2012, titled The risk of overestimating and underestimating “religious cults” in South Africa, expert Stephanus Pretorius expanded on the criteria used to classify cults.

“Members display excessively zealous and unquestioning commitment to its leader. The leader’s belief system, ideology and practices are viewed as the truth; as law. No questioning of doctrine or doubt is tolerated and dissent is discouraged or even punished,” he says.

“The group displays an elite mentality. This means that it claims a special, exalted status for itself, its leaders and members.”

However, classifying a group can be difficult. Pretorius warns against labelling a group as a cult simply because the interpersonal influence of the leader is “harmful”.

“It is understandable that relatives or friends affected by a loved one’s involvement in a particular group are at times desperate to protect them against harmful activities. The question that needs to be asked is whether the person is in a life-threatening situation. If not, a cautious and informed approach is advisable,” Pretorius says.

One of the hallmarks of a cult leader, Botha says, is that they often consider themselves “prophets”.

“Say, for example, that President Cyril Ramaphosa wins a nomination as ANC president during the week. That Sunday, the leader will say that they had predicted that last Sunday. So they create their own ‘miracles’,” he says.

“Also, there needs to be some aspect of healing – this is when you hear testimonies from congregants that they believe their leader healed them. This is one of the techniques they use to create a following.”

Added to this, their lifestyle and wealth is displayed to signify God’s blessing upon them.

“Life is tough. People go for things that give them hope and are sometimes exploited. It happens all over the world,” Botha says.

However, the line between a “normal” religious group and a cult is sometimes blurry.

“In a proper Christian religion, the leader does not posit himself as a conduit to God. Adherents are not expected to change their lives completely to follow their leader or isolate themselves from society. I think Bushiri may have created an opportunistic cult, but not a full-on religious cult,” he says.

Prophet Bushiri has always denied the claims that his miracles are from the devil but the living God.

The man of God has insisted that due to his success in business, others have created so many fake stories to frustrate his ministry.

Currently is being dragged to court for money laundering with also recent reports that Bushiri impregnated a wife to former Zimbabwe deputy minister Mukupe.

United Nations condemns Sangwa’s suspension

0

The United Nations has lambasted the Zambian government for the suspension of Constitutional Lawyer John Sangwa saying basic principles were violated, reports Zambian Eye Correspondent.

This follows an outcry from many quarters over how the state handled the matter. The Judiciary has barred Sangwa from appearing on any court in Zambia accusing him of having issued disrespectable remarks against Judges during his Television discussion program.

The UN Special Rapporteur on the Independence of Judges & Lawyers, Diego García-Sayán, condemned the suspension.

“I strongly condemn blatant violations of human rights against Mr John Sangwa. Lawyers must be independent and preserve his lawyer’s professional and intellectual independence with regard to the courts and professional colleagues,” he said.

Meanwhile, the American Bar Association Center for Human Rights (ABA justice defenders) says a hearing should have been carried out to determine the lawyer’s fate.
“Suspension of Zambia lawyer John Sangwa without a hearing raises serious due process and freedom of expression concerns,” says the defenders for justice.

Sangwa has been a strong critic of the proposed constitutional amendment especially Bill number 10. He has also publicly stated that incumbent President Edgar Lungu does not qualify to run in 2021 polls because he has already twice elected as provided by the Constitution.

“The UN Basic Principles on Lawyers stipulates that lawyers like other citizens are entitled to freedom of expression and to take part in matters of public interest. International standards also provide that only in exceptional circumstances must a lawyer be immediately suspended,” says ABA.

Sangwa was suspended for alleged misconduct. “This serves to inform all the Hon. Addressees that by the direction of the Judiciary Mr John Sangwa S.C, an advocate practising under the firm of Simeza, Sangwa and Associates will not longer be allowed to appear before any court in Zambia until further notice.

“This action has been taken following a complaint of professional misconduct made by the judiciary to the Law Society of Zambia against the said Mr Sangwa, SC,” reads the letter signed by Boniface Mwiinga, acting registrar and director of court operations.
Meanwhile, section 29 on disciplinary powers of Court or judge apart from inquiry by disciplinary committee states that:

“Nothing in this Act contained shall supersede, lessen or interfere with the powers vested in the Chief Justice or any of the Judges of the Court to deal with the misconduct or offences by practitioners.”

A rare glimpse in the mind and thoughts of Zambian soccer Icon Kalusha Bwalya

0

A rare glimpse in the mind and thoughts of Zambian soccer Icon Kalusha Bwalya

…reads like a chapter in a great autobiography

“Nobody prepares you for what you will face in the Professional World of Football. Nobody warns you of the ugly side, the side that nobody in Africa cautioned me (Kalu) about.”

I started my professional football career in Belgium in late 1985. From the modest township of Mufulira in Zambia, to the sophisticated streets of Brugge, ‘the Venice of the North’.

I had achieved a lot in the Zambian League with my Team Mufulira Wanderers. I was awarded Zambian Footballer of the Year 1984 and my National Team career was blossoming. The offer to go to Europe to ply my trade was like a dream come true. I felt privileged to have been given a chance to prove myself on the European stage.
I was strong, self confident and determined to succeed.

*Back in those days, black people were rare in Brugge. In fact, there were only three black players coming out of two premier league teams Cercle Brugge and Club Brugge.*
There were times at training when one of my team mates would ‘swear’ they had seen me in town that day. When I told them that I had not left my ‘foster’ parents home the whole day, they would shrug it off by saying *“you all (black people) look alike”* At first, it used to get me upset, but later on I learnt to laugh about it.

To get to training I used to need to take 2 buses and then walk about 150 metres to the grounds, even in the harshest of weather conditions. Initially all the players driving to training would drive past without as much as a hoot. As I started to make more impact on the ‘training pitch’ and challenging for a starting place in the team, they would stop and offer me a lift. I never accepted a lift and continued walking until I bought my own car. I conquered these examples of belittlement by strengthening my determination to prove to all that I could rise above these minor obstacles and prove my worth as an equal to them.

When I was finally in the 1st team, I got the shock of my life when I was booed by the opposition fans during the warm-up session. This was something I had never ever experienced before. The opposition fans hostility sometimes continued the entire match.

Through concentration and sheer determination I started ignoring it.

The chants and slurs were part of the game in the late 80’s and as I began to make a name for myself in the League, I paid less and less attention to it. This, coupled with resolve and fortitude allowed my mind to shut all of it out. All I wanted was to be respected for my skill not insulted for the colour of my skin. It just made me more resolute to succeed.

It needs to be known that to make it as a professional footballer does not happen by luck and talent alone. It takes ongoing strenuous practice, extreme discipline, unflinching determination, untold sacrifice, laser sharp focus and dedicated commitment. Players deserve to be respected for this.
It has always been a sad state of affairs when a minority try to influence the majority. The racist slants in stands have always come from a small portion of the crowd. A small portion so intent on their team winning they would do anything to see the opposition losing, even to stoop so low as to try and degrade them. Find a difference they can pick at and take it to the extreme.

I am not sure if walking off the pitch as a reaction to this; as was the case with Prince Boateng of AC Milan recently; achieves anything but victory for the offending party.
Many Football players have been victims at one time or the other. Uncivilised gestures, monkey noises and booing sounds to mention but a few have been experienced, but players need to soldier on. We are all trying to make in life in our respective fields.

Most fans across the World attend football games to enjoy the match and encourage their teams. The love outweighs the hate.

FIFA have made their position very clear in article 3 of their statutes, ‘Discrimination of any kind against a country, private person or group of people on account of ethnic origin, gender, language, religion, politics or any other reason is strictly prohibited and punishable by suspension or expulsion’

My opinion is to try and eradicate this scourge, the authorities need to try and manage it better. The onus should be on the clubs and National football associations to empower their safety personnel to identify the offenders and act swiftly to remove them from the stadium. They need to be named and shamed and banned from ever attending another game. In so doing they would think twice before shouting obscenities. If this cannot be done then we need to resort to hitting where it hurts most, by deductinvg points. I will support such a cause.

Discrimination is alive in our society unfortunately, practiced by a minority of people convinced that they are superior by one virtue or another. However, it does not mean we have to tolerate it. We, as the majority need to kick it out. It is a rare disease that needs to be wiped out. As players we need to stand tall and be strong, be immune to such pettiness. As fans we need to expose the perpetrators and stop them from infecting others with this disease.

Football is meant to conquer discrimination and adhere to the notion of fair play. Here we are in 2013, 28 years after by European debut, still talking about this scourge. How can we still call it the beautiful game?

SOURCE: Kalusha Bwalya @March 2020

#KalushaBwalya

Take Spax To Court On Monday, Orders Lusaka High Court

0

 

The Lusaka High Court has ordered the Zambia Police Service to avail Chingola businessman Kabaso Mulenga, popularly known as Spax, before court on Monday following his application for habeas corpus.

Spax has sued the Attorney General in the Lusaka High Court, seeking leave to issue a habeas corpus directed at the police to either release him or take him to court because he has been in custody since February 26, 2020 without charge or being taken to court.

High Court judge Wilfred Muma has ordered that Spax be taken to court on Monday and that the position is such that the State should have complied with the demands sought in the writ of habeas corpus.

He said that there was no
requirement for the State to acquire instructions as the order to take Spax to court is inherent in the writ.

Last week Friday, Spax applied for habeas corpus, saying since his arrest, he has only been warned and cautioned on suspicion of murder of a Mr. Emmanuel Mapunda Chibwe by officers from crime one police where he was also advised that he was being investigated in relation to a case of murder and use of military combat without authority.

He has alleged that the police are vindictive and abusing their powers by declining to release him or charge him or taking him before a competent court because from the time of his arrest, he has not been charged or taken to court.

“My continued detention without being charged is not only unjustifiable but also unlawful as it is unconstitutional in that fundamental and connotational guaranteed rights to freedom and liberty are being blatantly violated and unfairly prejudiced,” he submitted.

When the case came up before judge Muma today, Spax was, however, not before court and the judge wondered why he was not taken.

State advocate, Mr. D. Mwewa then informed the court that the State was served with the writ on March 11, 2020 by Spax’s lawyers and they immediately sought instructions from the client which they are yet to obtain and asked for an adjournment.

Mwewa said because Thursday was a public holiday, this caused the delay in obtaining instructions but noted that the State was alive to the fact that Spax’s application was urgent.

But Spax’s lawyers Iven Mulenga and a Mr. J. Sinkala, objected to the
State’s application, saying it was their considered view that before Mwewa could make an application, it must be established if the
State had complied with the order of the Honorable Court to have Spax availed.

But Mwewa said he did not have instructions and has since
written to his client, the Ministry of Home Affairs, the reason why he has sought the shortest adjournment.

Ruling on the application for an adjournment, judge Muma agreed with Spax’s lawyers that he needed to be availed in court but granted the adjournment to Monday and urged the State to comply with the demands sought in the writ of habeas corpus.

Tutwa Ngulube calls on LAZ to suspend Constitutional lawyer John Sangwa

0

A Lawyer has called on the Law Association of Zambia to suspend Constitutional lawyer John Sangwa for allegedly pouring scorn on the Constitutional court judges.

Mr. Tutwa Ngulube said that the association should send a strong message on the need for lawyers and all affected parties to respect decisions of the Judges.

Mr. Ngulube’s comments come in the wake of the Judiciary’s decision to bar Mr. Sangwa from appearing before any court while his matter is being considered by the Law Association of Zambia.

He has also proposed that the government should consider stripping Mr. Sangwa of the status of State Counsel.

Mr. Ngulube’s comment follows LAZ’s decision to condemn the stance that Mr. Sangwa has taken after losing a case where he had questioned President Lungu’s eligibility for 2021.

Last week the Judiciary banned Mr. Sangwa from appearing before any court in Zambia pending determination of his case by LAZ.

Meanwhile, PF Deputy Media Director Antonio Mwanza has welcomed the decision by LAZ to condemn the utterances of Mr. Sangwa against Constitutional Court Judges.

Mr. Mwanza said that LAZ should not allow any of its members to ridicule Judges for cheap political mileage, saying that the decision of the Constitutional Court is final and is now part of the Zambian law.

The PF Leadership in North-Western Province has welcomed the decision by the Judiciary to ban Lusaka Lawyer John Sangwa from appearing before any court in Zambia.

And Provincial Chairperson Jackson Kungo said Mr. Sangwa should not be allowed to appear before the people that he is allegedly disrespecting in public.

Mr. Kungo said that it was surprising that when the Constitutional Court ruled that Ministers who remained in the office should pay back the salaries they obtained, Mr. Sangwa and his friends did not call the Judges names, and that Mr. Sangwa is a bad loser who does not want to accept that he lost a case in which the Constitutional Court ruled that President Edgar Lungu is eligible to stand in 2021.

Mr. Kungo further said that it is sad that some people who are scared of President Lungu have resorted to all sorts of tactics to distract the PF from focusing on important national issues.

And New Congress Party President Peter Chanda has commended the Judiciary for banning Lusaka Lawyer John Sangwa from appearing in court in Zambia.

Pastor Chanda said that the move is commendable because the country’s institutions must be respected and that Mr. Sangwa cannot continue disregarding the court Judgement to the extent of attacking individual judges.

Mealie Meal Shortages: Purely Artificial And Man Made – Lusambo

0

By Hon. Bowman Chilosha Lusambo

MEALIE MEAL SHORTAGES: PURELY ARTIFICIAL AND MAN MADE

We conducted a very successful operation to ascertain the root cause of this mealie meal supply problem in Lusaka.

We started our tour at Shoprite Kafue Road outlet and we ended up visiting Shoprite SoS and we intercepted a number of young boys who have been engaged by unscrupulous businessmen to buy the commodity in bulk from Shoprite after which they are selling at exorbitant prices in our compounds.

As part of our operation, these boys led us to one of the business persons involved in this illegal trade. From our investigations, we can report that this shortage of mealie meal is artificially induced and purely man made by criminal elements bent on tarnishing the good name of His Excellency President Edgar Chagwa Lungu. I have since engaged the Provincial Chairman to work with our party structures across the province and I will also be involving our District Commissioners to ensuring that this illicit activities is brought to an end.

As Lusaka Province Minister, I will not sit with folded arms and watch President Lungu’s name be tarnished by greedy business people.

Nemo Judex In Causa Sua: From Savenda V Stanbic To John Sangwa, The People’s Lawyer

0

NEMO JUDEX IN CAUSA SUA: FROM SAVENDA v STANBIC TO JOHN SANGWA, THE PEOPLE’S LAWYER

“Nemo judex in causa sua” (no-one is judge in his own cause). The universality and applicability of this principle of natural justice is beyond challenge in any progressive society of human beings who are in the land of the living. No one can ever reasonably sit as judge in a case in which he has an interest. It is repeatedly submitted in all jurisdictions that, “justice must not only be done, but must be seen to be done”.

Any proceedings, anywhere in the world, in which a court or tribunal sits to hear its own case as prosecutors and judges, must be stopped. If such proceedings were not stopped and judgment got delivered, then such a judgment must be rendered invalid. It ought to be quashed or remitted for an impartial re-hearing. This standard of justice was long established in 1544.

We, in the United Progressive People (UPP), are in shock, but not surprised, that after close to 60 years of Zambia’s political independence, our justice system still begs for reform. The current generation is paying the price of the biggest scandal of all times – Zambia does not have a Constitution. We don’t know how well we shall explain this to the citizens of Zambia.

UPP has for years been working very hard, within the limits of its resource envelope, to reawaken the consciousness of all Zambians across tribe and race to the reality that what we have been referring to as “The Constitution of Zambia” is NOT a constitution. What we have is Schedule Two of an Order in Council, which order was issued as a subsidiary legislation by the Queen of England pursuant to the provisions of the Zambia Independence Act, Section 65 of the Laws of England.

Like all other former British colonies, our nation should have immediately after the proclamation of independence sat in a Constituent Assembly to craft and enact the Supreme Charter of the Land to put 100% a legal break to all the archaic colonial statues that still have an effect of law in our land.

Since when did it become illegal or contempt of Court for citizens in democratic society to discuss court rulings? Political parties, Churches, professional bodies, academicians, and the general populace are at liberty, in the enjoyment of free speech, to discuss matters of the judiciary, executive and legislature that affect their lives.

We, in the UPP, knew it that after the Savenda v Stanbic case, there are similar situations that will arise and more Zambians will pay the price. Courts shall continue to be abused by the appointing authority (the President) to settle political scores. These things have not started today, but we have continued to entertain such as normal.

The Chewas say, “chili pa muzhako chapita, mawa chili paiwe” (what affects your friend today will also affect you tomorrow). Yesterday it was Derrick Sinjela and Gregory Chifire, today it’s John Sangwa tomorrow it will be on you.

The media report that the distinguished Most Learned John Sangwa, SC, has been barred from appearing before any Court in Zambia must be followed by all of us, especially the youth across Zambia, with interest. What crime has the Most Learned John Sangwa, SC done to be barred? We wait to know the reasons.

To the youth of Zambia: take note that the next elections in 2021 will be about you! Nothing for the youth without the youth! #Calo #Cesu!

It’s time to arise from our caves to end all forms of tinpot dictatorship. Zambia for ALL of us and NOT for a few LOOTERS at the top!

#NoThirdTerm! #GoBack!

Saviour Chishimba
UPP PRESIDENT

#VOTE on the staff #Pankonto! for No PAYE; No Sales Tax; No Market & TV levies; No tolls on Public Roads; Land redistribution & houses for all Zambians.

#Kululazambia!
#OrganisingForChange!

Stop Threatening Striking Workers; Just Pay Them -UPND

0

PRESS STATEMENT

15th March 2020

STOP THREATENING STRIKING WORKERS; JUST PAY THEM.

They say, if shouting is your way of talking then use sign language, if threats are the way of PF solving labour disputes, they better try dialog. Agreed, strikes are counterproductive and that’s why we as UPND are for dialog. Yes, there has never been a legal strike in Zambia because of the cumbersome procedure to have one. However, strikes come about when workers feel so grieved and have no solution to their grievances. The only way left to reach out to authorities is to withdraw labour.

Why is PF failing to understand basic principles of good Industrial Relations? Whenever there is a strike as management you need to identify the reason(s) causing that and who is inciting others. Even you as PF you need answers to these questions before taking any disciplinary action against your workers. However in the case of the recent strikes by public workers the answers to these questions are very clear. Workers are striking because you PF have failed to pay them for months now. It’s also very clear that you PF are the ones inciting workers to go on strike.

How come now that you the same PF regime is threatening to fire these workers when all you need is to find money and pay them? Forcing workers with such grievances to report for work is worse than such workers staying away from work. These workers are very demotivated and as such cannot be productive. You’ll only be sending unproductive bodies for work. Remember, you can force a horse to the river but you cannot force it to drink water. A demotivated worker is very dangerous as he may even engage in acts of sabotage.

Surely, Ba PF how do you expect these workers to report for work when they cannot even afford transport to and from work? Are these sub human beings who can survive without food both at home and work? Can you be a motivated Minister who walks on foot to and from home to office and later Parliament? Can you continue reporting for work on an empty stomach, and leaving your entire family starving?

Is it not that you are always full and driven in expensive GX that’s why you have the energy to threaten others with dismissals if they don’t behave like slaves? These workers are human beings like you, just find money and pay them. Don’t push them too far, its only next year that you’ll be begging for votes from them. Continue treating workers like slaves, next year they will surely teach you a lesson. No worker will go without pay under HH/ UPND Government.

Percy Chanda

UPND – Chairman for Mines and Freedom Fighter

We’ve walked a long distance, we’re close to our destination – HH charms party youths

0

UPND leader Hakainde Hichilema charmed hundreds of animated party youths, with a message that: “we are close to our destination.”

The youths gathered at the UPND secretariat in Lusaka on Thursday, soon after a march past in commemoration of Youth Day and Hichilema addressed them.

Hichilema said he and other senior leaders in the UPND shared the pain of the youth and the rest of citizens.
Hichilema said the three principles that catapulted the PF into government in 2011 have all collapsed.

“I want you to know that we are close to our destination. We have walked a long distance but we are very close and this is the time you must work even harder. You must not lose hope because help is on the way!” Hichilema said.

“We have a duty to campaign, to register to get NRCs, to get voters’ cards and on the voting day to vote so that we can win big so that bakabwalala bakangiwe kuba ma vote (so that thieves fail to steal the vote). After voting, this time around, I’m giving you instructions ahead; protect your vote at all costs. Wamene azaba ma vote nizake izo (to them who will resort to stealing the vote, will do so at their peril). We must take over Lusaka, we must take over Copperbelt.”

He told today’s youth and the women to be as radical, in thought and action, like Julia Chikamoneka “who was able to demonstrate alone for independence.”

“Nothing should stand in our way so that we can liberate this country. When we cross the River Jordan, and I have seen the banks…we are going to cross the River Jordan. We know where we are going; we can see Canaan there,” Hichilema said to a cheering audience.

“My job, when you have delivered…. Don’t say ‘HH, protect your vote.’ It is you to protect our vote. When we cross the bridge, which is soon, our job as the economic team is to turn around the economy to send every child of Zambia to school, even if that child is an orphan.”

He reminded youths to recruit more members into the UPND and cautioned against intraparty bickering.
“I’m proud of your commitment,” Hichilema said.

“Zambian youths, UPND youths, I know that the country has been destroyed. I know that children are not going to school, I know that you don’t have jobs, I know that mealie-meal is scarce, I know that homes are overwhelmed with hardships. I want you to know that we share your pain. I as HH and the leaders of this party, share the pain of the people of Zambia. We share the pain of the youth because they are the future of this country.”

Hichilema further emphasised that when he is sworn-in, in the morning, as Republican President, “there will be law and order that afternoon.”

“That afternoon the kwacha will appreciate against the dollar, that afternoon any citizen can go to a bus stop and no one will beat them. You can go to a market wearing any party regalia and no one will beat you. My job is to bring law and order, not this confusion we are seeing under PF,” he explained.

“There is confusion, there is disorder because there is a shortage of leadership. You are worried about the shortage of mealie-meal [but] my worry is that there is a shortage of leadership in PF. You do your job; get NRCs, register as voters, turn out to vote, protect your vote until we are sworn-in and then my job will start – to deliver you to Canaan.”

He also reiterated that there could be no argument anymore about the failure of the PF to deliver to Zambians’ satisfaction.

“The three principles the PF campaigned on have all collapsed. They said ‘more money in the pocket’ [but] there is no money in the pocket, they said ‘more jobs’ but there are no jobs and they said that taxes will be lower but taxes are higher,” observed Hichilema.

“As a country we all agree that PF has failed and there is only one party that can take Zambia forward and that’s the UPND – my party, your party, our party, the party for the people of Zambia.”

LUNGU KWAMANA BADAALA ..he cannot run again; let’s be very clear – KBF

0

LUSAKA lawyer and PF presidential hopeful Kelvin Fube Bwalya says those in the ruling party can go to the apex of Mount Everest and sing ‘sole candidate, sole candidate’, in support of President Edgar Lungu, but makes a caution that he’s not eligible for 2021.

Bwalya is popularly known as KBF.

The caution is that: “the PF should avoid finding itself in a catch-22 situation where you can elect a president under the PF constitution who automatically becomes a republican presidential candidate but can’t stand because the Constitution will bars him.”

“That’s a catch-22. Why do you (President Lungu) want to get into that? Why do you want to go to the convention when you know the Republican Constitution will tell you ‘no, bwana you cannot?’ Why put the party into that inconvenience? Why?” Bwalya wondered when he featured on a special interview programme on Prime TV on Thursday night. “You can sing all you want, at the top of the mountain…. Go to mountain Everest and sing ‘sole candidate, sole candidate’ 20 times, a hundred times, the rule of law is what we are discussing – respect the Constitution. I’m still pleading; I do know that the Patriotic Front possesses internal mechanisms and I know that when tabled and argued in a proper, calm manner, this matter will be resolved.”

Bwalya profusely explained that President Lungu was not eligible to contest next year’s elections.

He said a President was allowed, by the Constitution, to rule for two terms of five years each.

Bwalya, however, noted that it was not mandatory that one must serve those five years in full.

“You cannot argue that the President (Lungu) did not hold office as I have heard some people arguing. The Constitution is a practical document – it speaks life into the nation… He cannot say that he has not been elected twice; he has. Therefore, he is caught by Article 106 (3). He cannot run again; let’s be very clear,” Bwalya explained.

“People have been saying ‘but the Constitutional Court said…’ No! The life of the presidency as an institution has always been attached to the life of Parliament. Parliament has power to prolong its life but in special circumstances, for instance, if there is a war. Once you are elected twice, kwamana badaala (it’s finished, old man).”

To the best of his ability, Bwalya does not believe that: “my older brother, my President, Edgar Chagwa Lungu, will impose himself on the people if he feels that he might not go in line with the Constitution, let alone just the embarrassment of having to be disqualified under a Constitutional Court decision.”

“It is unnecessary; he has done his best. We are not short of leaders in this country. It is best to just step aside and I have made this pronouncement to the Patriotic Front in very clear, humble terms. Step aside, ba President – you’ve done your best…” he noted.

On rule of law in Zambia, Bwalya, a one-time PF elections committee deputy chairman, said the best Constitution in the world would count for nothing, as long as the players who were running office did not respect that Constitution and the other laws that that Constitution bred.

“Once you have laws, respect the laws. Once the rule of law breaks down, the economy automatically suffers. Why? Because one of the pillars of economic development is that the rule of law gives confidence to investors – local and foreign investors. Once you are in political office, you are the torchbearer to the economy of the country, more so if you are vying for the highest office in the land,” he said, stressing that the kind of people elected to political office must be those who think and respect the Constitution.

“One of the biggest cornerstones of the rule of law is that you need a disciplined, committed leadership that will follow the rule of law. Once that is not there, in terms of character of the person running a country, you have a problem.”

Bwalya pointed out that without the aspect of the rule of law, “no investor or the IMF would listen to you.”

“You can go to the IMF [International Monetary Fund] on your knees and tell them ‘our people are suffering, we have mealie-meal shortages’, they will tell you ‘ah, but there are corrupt people in your government, but you are not following this; how do we help you?’ That is a very big litmus test that we are failing as a nation,” he said.

“So, governance for me, within one year, you must turn it around. There is no question about that; anybody who is going to be undisciplined, fire them. First of all, before you even pick them to become part of your Cabinet, scrutinise them. Mu cibemba tutila amano ayamfumu nibakabyo (in IciBemba we say a chief’s wisdom is dependent on his company). You cannot be a good leader when you have bad advisors!”

Asked if that was the case with the current government, Bwalya told the interviewer, Alexander Musokotwane: “do you live in Zambia, Mr Musokotwane? If you do, you know what I’m talking about.”

“We should not fear brains! You discard people with brains and you bring around you people who are seemingly not going to add value to you. What impression are you giving to the outside world?” Bwalya wondered.

About current policing in the country, in relation to the rule of law, Bwalya explained that the Zambia Police was a very vital department to enforce the rule of law and maintain law and order and good governance.

He, however, indicated that it was ill-fated that the Zambia Police were ill-funded and that training of officers had not changed, from colonial days.

“Sometimes you must move with the times! In the colonial days, the police force was used as a mobile unit to curb riots. Part of the training today at Lilayi still is about curbing riots! When you have got democracy, people are supposed to express themselves, they are supposed to be free…” he noted. “When you have a policeman who is trained and he feels that the only way he can enforce the rule of law is by beating people, you have a problem. Over-interference in the police and abusing the police to do political issues, instead of doing a professional policing job is another problem. The police need to be reviewed, in terms of its training. It needs to be re-educated, re-trained and all the syllabus at Lilayi must change to conform to the democratic dispensation that we have accepted politically. We cannot be teaching the police 1965 tactics today and expect them to enforce the law on people in 2020. It doesn’t make sense!”

Bwalya also said when the citizens don’t trust the police, there is a clash because: “the police have got guns and sometimes live bullets.”

“The gassing itself, [we had] 46 deaths but we don’t know the number of people who were shot by the police. That’s the kind of policing we don’t want,” noted Bwalya.

Kaizer Zulu disputes K2.4m compensation sought by Lindgurst driver

0

Kaizer Zulu says the K2,500,000 being claimed by a driver of Lyndhurst School Joe Tembo as compensation for pain is irregular as he has not shown how he arrived at the said amount.

Zulu says he cannot defend himself in the matter not until Tembo explains how he arrived at the sum.

In this matter, Zulu has been sued in the Lusaka High Court by Tembo whom he allegedly assaulted when their vehicles collided in Lusaka’s Ibex hill area while he was picking up school children.

Tembo is demanding K3,054,000 as damages.

He wants K554,000 as special damages, and K2,500, 000 as compensation for pain.

He is also seeking damages for torture, anguish and embarrassment resulting from the assault and battery by Zulu and interest on all sums, costs and any other reliefs that the court might deem fit.

In his statement of claim, Tembo said on November 19, 2019, whilst he was driving a Toyota Hiace mini bus picking school children in Ibex Hill, Zulu’s vehicle, a Toyota Land Cruiser rammed into the bus he was driving before it rested in a drain on Twin Palm road.

He said that on his way to 2nd Street in Ibex Hill, he was about to turn into Avic road and did indicate to motorists who were following him that he was about to turn and waited for an oncoming vehicle to pass.

“When the oncoming vehicle drove past the plaintiff’s bus, the plaintiff started turning into Avic Road and whilst turning, he heard a loud bang on the bus he was driving and he saw a Toyota Land Cruiser which hit the bus in the drainage along Twin Palm road,” Tembo said.

The plaintiff narrated that when he got off the vehicle to check if everyone was okay, he saw Zulu, who was seated in the driver’s seat and on a phone call, raise his thumb to signal to him that he was okay.

Tembo said that 20 minutes later, he saw two motor vehicles which were occupied by huge men, who arrived at the accident scene and Zulu came out of his vehicle.

He said that Zulu asked the onlookers at the scene who the driver of the bus was and when he told him that he was the driver of the school bus, Zulu brandished a gun and pointed it at him and ordered his allies who arrived at the scene to beat him up on the premise that he wanted to cause his (Zulu) death.

Tembo said that Zulu ordered the thugs to rough him up and clobber him.

He said some military personnel arrived at the scene and questioned why he (Tembo) was being lynched but Zulu showed them his ID and they drove away.

Tembo stated that the cadres continued beating him up and Zulu kicked him on the chin and he started bleeding from his nose and mouth after which he collapsed and became unconscious and was only awaken by a doctor at University Teaching Hospital (UTH).

But Zulu in an Affidavit in support of summons to set aside writ of summons for irregularity said that a quick perusal of the said writ of summons contains claims for liquidated damages of K2,500,000 being compensation for pain when the said damages ought to be assessed by the court after trial and only if he was found liable.

Zulu said the said claim of K2,500,000 was irregular and offends the rules of court in so far as the pleadings were concerned when dealing with unliquidated damages which could only be assessed by the court after trial.

“The defendant is unable to provide any defence when the plaintiff does not state how he arrived at the said amount without assessment of the court,” Zulu stated,

He said he tried to get clarification from Tembo’s advocates on how the amount was assessed as compensation for pain but the complainant failed to respond to the request.

“The originating process is irregular and an abuse of court process and should be set aside in the interest of Justice.” Said Zulu.

Iris Kaingu Pens A Touching ‘love Letter’ To The Zambian Youths

0

IRIS KAINGU PENS A TOUCHING ‘LOVE LETTER’ TO THE ZAMBIAN YOUTHS.. she writes!

“Open Letter to Youth in Zambia

To begin, I would like to say I have given this a lot of thought for a few months now. It’s really disheartening that as a nation we constantly want to focus on negativity, gossip and pulling each other down. The truth is we never celebrate positivity, achievements and above all, Each other.

The stories/agendas that take wind are

– Seer 1 (Andrew) taking his powers back like he even has any powers to give in the first place. We devoted our energy to this as it was a trending topic just so we can be amused by “people’s down fall” – which by the way never happened.

– You take a Mickey out of our First Lady pleading (appealing) to the nation in a crisis. You laugh at a mother’s tears? How do you expect God to bless us?

– You make a mockery of the national day of prayer. We ought to be ashamed of ourselves.

– You entertain yourselves with what Chellah Tukuta does in his private time.

– We are the best makers of memes and auto tunes. If this made us money I would entertain it.

On the Current Government:

Yes it is true that they have not seen through certain things that need to be addressed. We need to understand that the whole world is in a crisis. All economies are affected: But it’s certainly not true that they have not worked. I don’t see people celebrating
– the efforts they are making weekly for the students in China through the Zambian Embassy in China.
– the great road network infrastructure in the capital and beyond
– the management of areas affected by climate change patterns (through the DMMU wing in the office of the Vice President)
– the fact that people called for declaration of a state of emergency but the situation has been managed.
– the many schools and hospitals that have been built. Etcetera!

Point is: it is very important to celebrate wins and come together in unity to see how losses may be managed!!

Zambians we need to change our mind set. It will not be a change of government that will save us!! The truth is even with a change of governors we will still be the same rotten people who constantly complain and never offer solutions!! You each have an area member of parliament- talk to them take them to task! That is what they are elected for, to bring us solutions. We are better with our heads together

I challenge every person who says we need change to comment below: **what we can do differently so that we can make our country great again**

Thank you.”

State fail to present Spax in court

0

THE State on Friday failed to avail Chingola Jerabo aligned to the Patriotic Front Baba Kabaso Mulenga popularly known as ‘Spax’ before the High Court for hearing of his application for leave to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus AD Subjiciendum directing the police to either release him or take him to court so that he can be tried on allegations of murder and unauthorised use of uniforms.

In this matter, Mulenga has sued the stated and cited the Attorney General seeking an order that he be released from police custody as he has not been charged with any offence.

When the matter came up for hearing of the Habeas Corpus application, Attorney General Likando Kalaluka sought an adjournment on grounds that the State was served with a writ on March 11, 2020 by Mulenga’s lawyers.

“We immediately sought instructions from our client and we are yet to obtain the same. The court will note that yesterday [Wednesday] was a public holiday and this has caused the delay,” Kalaluka explained.

“We are alive to the fact that this is an urgent application. We are therefore humbly requesting for an adjournment to enable us obtain instructions and defend the interest of the State accordingly.”

But Mulenga’s lawyer Iven Mulenga and J.Sinkala said service of the writ was effected on the officer-in-charge who had custody of Mulenga and does not need instructions because it was the duty of the officer to take the accused to court but the applicant was not before court.

“It is our considered view that before we can consider the application for an adjournment, the court has to be satisfied that the body is before the court. We therefore ask the guidance of the court before we can comment on the application for an adjournment,” he said.

Sinkala added that the nature of the application demands that the body be brought before court and the State has not even addressed the court with the issue of whether the body had been brought.

“The role of counsel was to advise the authority that had the body of the applicant to comply with the order.
It would be incompetent to make an application without the body. We therefore object.” Said Sinkala

In his response, Kalaluka said he did not have instructions as he had written to the Ministry of Home Affairs, hence the application for the shortest possible time.

“Our application is not incompetent as alleged by counsel, we humbly pray that the court considers the application,” said Kalaluka

In his ruling, justice Wilfred Muma said there was no regard or instructions to bring Mulenga before court as the order to bring his body was inherent in the writ.

“Nevertheless, in the interest of justice, I shall grant the application for an adjournment and order hence forth that the State complies with the order to bring the body before court. The matter is adjourned to March 16, 2020,” said justice Muma.

In his affidavit in support of ex-parte summons for grant of leave to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus, Mulenga, who is a businessman and proprietor of Spax mining, said his continued detention without being charged was not only unjustifiable but also unlawful as it was unconstitutional because his fundamental and guaranteed rights to freedom and liberty were being blatantly violated and unfairly prejudiced.

Mulenga contended that on February 26, he was apprehended by police officers in Chingola on the Copperbelt who identified themselves as crime one police officers of police headquarters Lusaka and he was brought to Lusaka the same day and detained at Chelston police station.

The murder suspect said he was detained in cells and no one was allowed to see him neither was he allowed to talk to his lawyers until Saturday February 29, when he was taken to the Chief Investigations Officer’s office for a warn and caution statement for the alleged murder of Emmanuel Chibwe.

Mulenga said officers from crime one advised him that he was being investigated in relation to a case of murder and use of military combat without authority.

He said after warn and caution statement was administered he (Mulenga) was not charged with any offence but he was transferred from Chelston police station to Chilenje police station and later to Ibex Hill police station where has been kept without being charged.

“I have been informed that I cannot be released by the police until further notice as they are still carrying out investigations and that they have not yet formulated the charge and I believe that the state, its servants or agents is vindictive and abusing their powers by declining to release me or charging me and taking me before a competent court because from the time of my arrest and detention [on] February 26, 2020, I have not been charged or presented before a court of law to answer to any charge,” Mulenga lamented.

He claimed that attempts to have the matter brought before court have proved futile as the police insist that he remains in their custody.

He contended that his rights against unlawful detention had been breached and would continue to be infringed and it was only fair and just that a writ of Habeas Corpus AD Subjiciendum be issued to secure his protection under the law.

” In the interim, I strongly believe an order for my release will prevent the high likelihood of any delay by my custodians defeating the due course of justice which should not only be deemed to be done but also seen to be done,” said Mulenga said

Zambia struggling to manage debt- Fitch Ratings

0

A significant overshooting of the fiscal deficit in 2019 highlights the Zambian government’s difficulties in reining in debt accumulation, Fitch Ratings says.

Already high debt levels will remain a key vulnerability, even if recently announced measures are effective in slowing the pace of further debt accumulation.

According to a fiscal update from the Minister of Finance, Zambia recorded a preliminary fiscal deficit of 8.2% of GDP in 2019 in the government’s definition, well above the budget target of 6.5%.

Excluding debt amortisation and including arrears accumulation, the deficit was closer to 9% of GDP on a commitment basis.

Government revenues were higher than the government’s target, boosted by higher than expected inflation and improved revenue collection.

Expenditures exceeded the 2019 budget by approximately 9%, reflecting higher interest payments, which were 1% of GDP above target due to the currency’s sharp depreciation, and by capital expenditures and subsidies.

Fitch affirmed Zambia’s ‘CCC’ rating in December 2019, noting the high and rising government debt in the context of an ambitious capital expenditure programme.

Fitch’s forecasts assume that debt will peak in 2020, but remain at a level that keeps the government’s external financing requirements high relative to official FX reserves.

The ‘CCC’ rating is indicative of Fitch’s view that Zambia faces a heightened probability of default.

An increase in international reserve coverage or a fiscal adjustment that increase refinancing options could lead Fitch to take positive rating action.

Zambia’s 2020 Budget, approved in September 2019, called for narrowing the fiscal deficit to 5.5% of GDP.

However, the government’s inability to meet spending targets in 2019 highlights how difficult it will be to achieve any substantial narrowing of the deficit in 2020.

In late December, the cabinet approved measures to slow the contraction of new external project loans and cancel or reduce undisbursed external loans that had already been contracted.

If implemented, these measures could reduce the stock of undisbursed loans by USD5 billion, or 21.5% of GDP, and slow the accumulation of new debt.

However, similar, albeit less specific, commitments under the previous finance minister had not led to significant progress in reducing deficits or debt accumulation.

As a result, we are also sceptical about progress on an IMF programme, although the government will hold further discussions with the IMF in March and April.

In addition to a credible plan for reducing deficits, the IMF may insist on a debt re-structuring.

In his recent remarks, the Minister of Finance also mentioned that the government is seeking debt re-profiling, pending a review of legal implications.

Persistent fiscal deficits increased general government debt to 88% of GDP in 2019, from 32% in 2014.

External public debt was US11.1 billion (54% of GDP). Zambia faces approximately USD1.5 billion in external debt servicing (105% of current international reserves) in 2020.

While the government is likely to manage its 2020 debt servicing requirements, Eurobond repayments of USD750 million in September 2022 and USD1 billion in April 2024 will lead to a surge in external debt servicing in these years.

Meanwhile, the external position fared better than expected, as gross international reserves ended 2019 at USD1.4 billion, unchanged from end-2018.

The reserves position was helped by the turn of the current account to a surplus of about 1% of GDP.

Zambia’s current account last was in surplus in 2014, prior to the collapse in copper prices.

We’re close to forming govt, predicts HH

0

UPND president Hakainde Hichilema says the party is close to reaching its destination of forming government next year because the PF had lamentably failed to deliver on its campaign promises.

And Hichilema says it is clear that those who accused the UPND of being gassing masterminds were the ones involved in the illegal acts.

Speaking to UPND youths at the party secretariat in Lusaka, Thursday, Hichilema said the UPND had walked a long distance and were now close to their destination and within reach of forming government in 2021.

“As a country, we all agree that PF has failed. They said, ‘more money in the pockets,’ there is no money in the pockets; they said, ‘more jobs,’ there are no jobs; they said, ‘taxes will be lower,’ but taxes are higher! Even to drink water, you are taxed; even to go to the toilet, you are taxed. Now, because PF has failed, there is only one party that can take Zambia forward. That is your party, that is my party, that is a party for the people of Zambia. I want you to know that we are close to our destination; we have walked a long distance; we have walked a long distance, but we are there; we are very close! This is the time you should work even harder so that we can liberate the people of Zambia. You must not lose hope because help is on the way,” Hichilema said.

“Nothing should stand in our way so that we can liberate this country. When we cross the river Jordan, and I am seeing the banks, they are there, we are close. Lungu alungusha chalo! My dear friends, youths in Zambia, youths in the UPND I know that the country is destroyed; I know that children are not going to school; I know that you don’t have jobs; I know that mealie meal is nowhere to be seen; I know the sufferings you are going through at home…they are a lot. I want you to know that we share your pain. I, as HH and the leaders of this party, we share your pain. We share the pain for the people of Zambia; we share the pain of the youth because they are the future of this country. We all know that before we used to argue, some people were saying that PF will deliver. We know that the three principles the PF campaigned for have all collapsed!”

He instructed party members to protect their votes at all costs in 2021.

“We have to campaign, to register, to get NRCs and voters’ cards and on the voting day, we vote so that we can win big! And after voting this time round, I am giving you instructions ahead: protect your vote at all costs! Protect your vote at all costs! The one who is going to steal the vote, that is his own problem. We must take over Lusaka, we must take over Copperbelt. The youth of Zambia, the women of Zambia, be like Julia Chikamoneka, who was able to demonstrate her role for independence; we must follow in her footpath; we must work hard as a group; we must work hard as a party; we must work hard as a country,” he urged.

“Don’t say, ‘HH protect our votes,’ HH is only one person; it is you to protect. When we cross the bridge, which is soon my job and our job as an economic team, is to turn around the economy to send every child of Zambia to school, even if that child is an orphan. Education and skills is number one; number two is to give you jobs; I know how to get jobs; number three is to give you businesses.”

Hichilema pledged to restore law and order in the country on the first day he is elected Republican President.

“When we come in the morning we are sworn in, first, there will be law and order that afternoon; then, that afternoon, the kwacha will appreciate against the dollar; that afternoon, any citizen can go to a bus stop and no one will beat them; you can go to the market wearing any party regalia and no one will beat them. My job is to bring law and order, not this confusion we are seeing under PF,” Hichilema said.

“There is confusion and there is disorder because there is a shortage of leadership. You are worried about the shortage of mealie meal? My worry is that there is a shortage of leadership. That is our promise to the people of Zambia, you do your job, register as voters, get NRCs turnout to vote; protect your vote until we are sworn in and then my job is to deliver you to Canaan.”

And Hichilema said it was clear that those who accused the UPND of being the masterminds of the gassing incidents were the ones perpetrating the illegal acts.

“They wanted to accuse us on gassing, but it was them, it is clear, it is known. I want say to say to you, the people who suffered under gassing organized by those people you know; the people who died over police bullets, we want to know because it is clear those people were killed illegally and we want to ensure that we have that information and it can be used at the right time. But our job, right now, is to deliver UPND into government and the rest, leave it to me,” said Hichilema.

“Are you still doubting HH? How can you doubt? When there is no rain, it is HH; if there is no mealie meal, it is HH; then HH is the one who has solutions! You are in a right party; you should be proud of yourselves. Recruit more members, don’t fight against yourselves. I am proud of your commitment.”

Vespers’ father sues State for loss of expectation of life

0

FATHER of the late UNZA student Vespers Shimunzhila has sued the State demanding damages for loss of expectation of life to be assessed by the court.

Davison Shimunzhila, who vowed to further seek justice for his daughter’s death after the Coroner established that the cause of death for Vespers was asphyxia due to smoke but no police officer present could be held liable, wants damages for pain and suffering, to be assessed by the court.

Shimunzhila has cited the Attorney General in the matter, seeking damages for loss of future, prospective earnings, punitive damages to be assessed by the court and any other relief that the court might deem necessary and costs.

In his statement of claim, Shimunzhila, who is the administrator of the estate of his late daughter, lamented that the actions of the police were reckless and negligent and were in complete disregard for human decency, human life and respect for the law.

Shimunzhila contended that Vespers was deprived of an opportunity to live a full life and that she suffered pain as a result of the suffocation which was caused by teargas and smoke which resulted from the reckless and negligent actions of the Zambia police service.

He said on October 4, 2018, there was commotion at the University of Zambia Great East Road campus where students were protesting against the delayed payment of meal allowances.

Shimunzhila stated that unidentified police officers entered the university and fired teargas canisters into the student hostels which caused a matress to catch fire and the smoke, combined with the noxious gases from the canisters, made it difficult for one to breathe.

He recalled that Vespers who was in her room whilst other students protested was declared dead on October 5, 2018 and the caused of death was owing to asphyxia caused by carbon monoxide inhalation due to fire.

Shimunzhila added that the verdict in an inquest which was put up to ascertain the cause of his daughter’s death found that teargas fired into the rooms caused or resulted into fire and smoke which led to asphyxia suffered by Vespers.

In an open verdict delivered in October 2019, coroner Silvia Munyinya said the fire which gutted the hostel housing Shimunzhila’s room was ignited by teargas, which was fired into the rooms by the police officers who went to UNZA to maintain calm when the students rioted as they were the only ones who were armed.

Coroner Munyinya said though the officers were behind the incident, it was so difficult to establish the culprit.

She indicated that the specific time at which Vespers took her last breath was not clear because she was alive on October 4, 2018 during the riot when she was searching for keys to the door in an attempt to secure her life by leaving the room.

“I find that the deceased died between 22:00 hours on October 4, 2018 and 04:00 hours on October 5, 2019. She might have died in her room, on the way to the compass clinic or at Levy Mwanawasa hospital,” the coroner said.

“I find that police officers who responded to the riot at UNZA discharged teargas towards the hostel which caused the fire as they were the only ones who were armed. Though it was so, the officers are not known. On whether or not there is someone to charge for her death, it is difficult to point out the particular officer but only police officers were armed.”

The coroner said police officers fired teargas canisters towards the windows with the knowledge that property would be damaged, which left much to be desired.

She noted that there was need to check the conduct of the police during the riot as it was retrogressive.

Coroner Munyinya urged the police to avoid dereliction of duty and conduct investigations seriously and endeavor to maintain law and order in a professional manner.

Shimunzhila is represented by LCK Chambers.

Remove ConCourt judges; they are an incompetent bunch – Sishuwa Sishuwa

0

University of Zambia lecturer Dr Sishuwa Sishuwa has called for the removal of all Constitutional Court judges for gross misconduct and incompetence.

Commenting on constitutional lawyer John Sangwa’s observation that President Edgar Lungu dribbled Zambians when he appointed unqualified individuals as Constitutional Court judges, Dr Sishuwa agreed.

He said only individuals who meet the constitutional requirements to serve as a judge on the ConCourt: namely, specialised training or experience in human rights or constitutional law and 15 years’ experience as a legal practitioner, should have been chosen to serve on the court.

“The Constitutional Court has the final say on all matters relating to the interpretation of the Constitution including the election of the President, so those serving on it should be qualified, competent and impartial individuals with an intimate knowledge and understanding of the Constitution. The fact is that if a sitting president is able to both rig an election and control the Constitutional Court, it is hard to see how he or she can ever be voted out of office. In appointing unqualified individuals to the court, Lungu may have reasoned that it represented the best way of preparing for any possible legal challenge to his election and the constitutional battles over his eligibility or qualification to stand again.”

Dr Sishuwa argued that the ConCourt judges misconducted themselves during President Lungu’s eligibility case by abandoning the questions that were specifically asked by the applicants.

“Aside the question of their qualification, the judges have shown on more than one occasion that they are an incompetent bunch. One was in relation to the amateurish way in which they handled the election petition in 2016. The latest is in relation to how they handled Chishimba Kambwili’s legal challenge against the decision of the Speaker of the National Assembly to declare his Roan constituency seat vacant. In this case, both parties are claiming victory, on account of the court’s failure to give an unambiguous judgement. Yet another example of the incompetence of the Constitutional Court relates to how they handled the matter of whether President Lungu is eligible to stand for another term of office at the next election”, he said.

Dr Sishuwa said instead of answering the two questions that were asked by the applicants, the Court “threw away both questions and unilaterally invented a brand new question”.

“To avoid misinterpreting what the Court said, it is worth quoting their remarks at length as captured on page 51 of its 7 December 2018 judgement:

‘We note that although the Applicants argued in their submissions that this matter has been brought pursuant to Article 128(1)(a), which gives this Court jurisdiction to interpret constitutional provisions, the manner the above question has been couched personalises the issue in that it targets the incumbent President as an individual. We do not encourage this trend because the framing of the questions for this Court’s interpretation of constitutional provisions should not target any individual as it is meant for general application as the interpretation is binding on every person in the Republic. What we are dealing with in the present case is the office of the President. We of course understand what the question is or what it ought to have been and what it aims at, namely, the office of the President. The question therefore is or ought to have been framed as follows: Whether in terms of Article 106 (3) and (6), a presidential term of office that ran from 25th January 2015 to 13th September 2016 and straddled two constitutional regimes can or should be considered as a full term’”.

The UNZA academic said both the language used by the court and the justification provided for inventing their own question and discarding the questions raised by the applicants were incriminating.

“There are three fundamental questions that arise from the reasoning of the Constitutional Court. First, from where did the judges draw their understanding of what the “question ought to have been”, outside what the parties to the case submitted? Second, which law or authority gave the court permission to discard or completely throw away the applicants’ specific questions and replace then with the court’s own question? Third, if the Constitutional Court found that the arguments presented by the applicants did not meet the required standard to give them the reliefs sought, based on the specific questions that were brought to the court for determination, why didn’t it dismiss the case? It is a known principle of the law that a court, as a neutral arbiter, should never volunteer anything, be it a question or issue without the knowledge and consent of the parties involved or outside what the parties have presented to the court for determination. The moment a court does that, then it joins one of the contending parties and loses its impartiality. When a judge loses their impartiality, then they lose their authority to be called a judge. Since impartiality is the hallmark of the independence of the judiciary, what the judges of the Constitutional Court did amounts to the highest form of incompetence and gross misconduct. This is a potential ground for their removal from office. The fact that all the six judges of the Court were unanimous in their shocking decision means they are all culpable”, he said.

Dr Sishuwa added that it was wrong for the ConCourt to threaten and intimidate citizens into submission of its judgements using contempt of court powers.

“I note how the Constitutional Court began its judgment on the eligibility case with a warning to potential critics right in the opening paragraph. The Court seems to have been fully conscious of the problematic nature of the judgment they were about to deliver and the likely ruthless criticism it would attract from the public. It therefore sought to insure itself from public accountability and criticism by introducing the judgement with a stern warming to critics. We should remember that this threat from the Constitutional Court came about two weeks after the Supreme Court sentenced a critic, Gregory Chifire, to a shocking six-year-prison term for contempt of court for criticising members of the court after they had passed what was deemed to be a controversial judgement”, he said.

“There is no need for judges to threaten or intimidate citizens, especially those who raise fair comment on their decisions. Article 118 (1) of Zambia’s Constitution provides that “The judicial authority of the Republic derives from the people of Zambia and shall be exercised in a just manner and such exercise shall promote accountability.”

Russia opens troll farms in Ghana and Nigeria to influence US elections

0

Russian cyber disinformation efforts identified by US intelligence agencies during the 2016 election cycle have resurfaced, this time with Russia-backed troll farms in Ghana and Nigeria.

A CNN investigation published on Thursday evening pointed out that Russia has outsourced some of the coordinated misleading campaigns to individuals in the West African countries.

This time the efforts are more targeted although it would seem trolls are focused on the same fault lines they did in 2016: racial issues.

The extensive report noted that these trolls open social media accounts in the name of “promoting black empowerment” as well as making suggestions toward hostility against white Americans.

@Africamustwake, one of the accounts, reportedly tweeted at one time: “YOU POLICE BEEN KILLING BLACKS SINCE YA RAGGEDY MOMMAS GAVE BIRTH TO U. HAPPY MLK DAY TO U HYPOCRITES.”

Over 200 accounts are thought to have been created by the trolls in Ghana. A majority of these accounts were made in the second half of 2019.

Prior to and after the US elections of 2016, intelligence services reported that concerted efforts were made by Russia to exploit weaknesses in the American social fabric.

Partisan and racial tensions were inflamed by internet trolls employed in a now-infamous building in St.Petersburg, Russia. They also shared concocted news reports and created echo-chambers.

Although it was also said Russia’s bet was for Donald Trump to win the elections of 2016, trolls fed both liberal and conservative prejudices.

The idea of a disunited America, it seems, was the long game for Russia. The attempts were also replicated in elections in the European Union.

Twitter and Facebook came under fire from publics across the world but much critically from US lawmakers. The idea of fake news and how it was spread was put under the microscope.

The two giant social media companies were forced to purge tens of thousands of accounts on their platforms.

In the revelations on troll farms in Ghana and Nigeria, CNN quoted a Twitter statement: “Most (of the troll accounts) were tweeting in English and presented themselves as based in the United States…The accounts — operating out of Ghana and Nigeria and which we can reliably associate with Russia — attempted to sow discord by engaging in conversations about social issues, like race and civil rights.”

Facebook also says while over 13,000 followed “one or more of the Ghana accounts around 263,200 people followed one or more of Instagram accounts.”

About 65% of the followership was in the United States.

Russian troll farm efforts have been connected to Yevgeny Prigozhin, a man close to President Vladimir Putin. Prigozhin’s Internet Research Agency (IRA) is believed to have sponsored the efforts in Ghana, through Seth Wiredu, a Ghanaian who has been based in Russia for years.

Wiredu at a point went with the alias Mr. Amara and claimed he was from South Africa. Wiredu is said to have put together a group of people who vigorously posted on social media.

The trolls were heavily rewarded based on how many followers they could gain and the reach of their posts.

But Wiredu, who was covertly recorded in an interrogation with the CNN, denies knowledge of IRA disinformation campaigns.

DON’T PLAY WITH FOOD BA PF…it’s going to bring civil strife, Kambwili warns

0

CHISHIMBA Kambwili says if the price and shortage of mealie-meal is not well handled, it is going to cause civil strife like never seen before in Zambia.

Commenting on the shortage and resultant skyrocketing prices of the staple food, the National Democratic Congress leader recalled that in the past the issue of mealie-meal caused uprisings and disturbances.

“The price of mealie-meal is going to cause a civil strife in Zambia. The price and shortage of mealie-meal if not well handled is going to bring civil strife in Zambia that people have never seen,” he warned. “From November when the price of mealie-meal started going up, we were made to believe that it was temporary and that the price will come down. All those in government, including the President, [Lusaka Province minister Bowman] Lusambo, Minister of Agriculture [Michael Katambo] have been issuing statements continually that the price of mealie-meal will come down but to the contrary what we are seeing is that the price of mealie-meal has continued to go up.”

Kambwili, a former PF minister of information, said given what was obtaining, the history of unrests over mealie-meal was about to repeat itself.

“Today National Milling is selling a bag of a 25 Kg of mealie-meal at K249 and other retailers are selling it at K280 in Kabwe and this is unacceptable. Zambia has experienced one serious civil strife during [Dr Kenneth] Kaunda’s time which was based on the price of mealie-meal and history is about to repeat itself if we are not careful as a nation, and if those in government continue to be complacent and glossing over a very serious issue,” he said.

“Governments the world over subsidise their staple foods…For instance, in Angola their staple food is bread and it is highly subsidised to an extent that everybody, including a small child can get coins and go and buy bread. But why is it that we are allowing the price of our staple food to go up? And when these people say we are going to have a bumper harvest, that’s the latest lie – they have been telling us that we are likely to have a bumper harvest and due to that bumper harvest the price of mealie-meal will go down…really what kind of thinking is that?”

Kambwili said telling people that prices of mealie-meal would go down due to the impending bumper harvest was lopsided thinking because operating costs for millers have gone up.

He said with or without a bumper harvest, the price of the staple food would not go down because of the increase in fuel and electricity tariffs which were at the centre of production.

“Look, the price of a 50 Kg bag of maize [went up from] K60 to K150 and has remained as such and even during the new season, the price will remain the same if not going up again… From K60 to K150 and the operating costs for a milling company have gone up by over 200 per cent, electricity has been increased by over 200 per cent, fuel has been increased to unacceptable levels and now what will the bumper harvest do?” Kambwili asked. “With or without the bumper harvest, the price of mealie-meal will still remain the same or will go up. The price of fuel will remain the same or go up, the price of electricity is already increased, so what logic is in their statements?”

Kambwili recalled that the PF media team ridiculed him in January when he said the actual cost of mealie-meal going by the factors of production would be about K250.

He said he feels vindicated that now the price of mealie-meal was as he predicted in January.

He added that any government that fails to control the price of a staple food was a failed government.

“My appeal to my brother and friend President Edgar Lungu, bane nga namufilwa ukwikuta muchipe cha bwali mukukombelesha teti wikute iyo [if you can’t get full from a plate of nshima, you cannot get full from crumbs], the best they can do is to own up and resign and give others who can do something better,” he said.

Kambwili said Zambia was not short of leaders. “Imbwili ilelolela [Kambwili is in waiting] to come and show them the best way to run this country. There is no way the price of mealie-meal can be increasing every day and then now we have shortages. The people of Zambia, I have always told you that when God wants a certain government to leave, he will not tell you that ‘I am God, this government has failed’ but it is calamities like these that start happening,” he said. “God is telling you that these guys are tired. Wake people of Zambians, stop being docile. You have the power; don’t be bought by a chitenge and T-shirt because chitenge and T-shirts will never buy mealie-meal for you. The majority of people today earn just about K700 – guards, maids, garden boys etc, etc. and those that work for Chinese companies…meaning that with their salary they can only buy two bags of mealie-meal and that is it. But where do they get money to take their children to school? Civil servants have had no salary increments to talk about from 2013 when we gave them a proper salary increment but since then they have never had a salary adjustment.”

Kambwili warned the PF government not to play around with food stressing that “anything else but the staple food” would be costly for them.

“Don’t play with food Ba PF, icibemba citila ati akabomba kabiye kamuunda, you can play around with power but not mealie meal,” said Kambwili.

Lungu will win 2021 by 70 %, those saying he’s ineligible are scared – Chitotela

0

PAMBASHE PF member of parliament Ronald Chitotela says the ruling party is destined for victory again in 2021 as its preferred candidate, President Edgar Lungu is still popular and will win by over 70 per cent.

And PF deputy secretary general Mumbi Phiri has challenged the Zambia Police Service to ensure that they arrest anyone involved in violence ahead of the 2021 elections.

Meanwhile, Geoffrey Mwamba has assured the country that government will ensure mealie meal prices are brought down in the next two months to.

Speaking at a PF youth rally to mark this year’s Youth Day celebrations in Lusaka yesterday, Chitotela who is also Tourism and Arts Minister said those insisting that President Lungu was not eligible to contest next year’s elections were just scared.

“I want to say this to Madam Mumbi Phiri; there is this one person that has taken it upon himself to make sure that President Lungu should not stand in 2021, but tell him that for us in PF, we are not going to have leadership change. Our President is Edgar Chagwa Lungu. So tell that gentleman [State Counsel John Sangwa] that he’s just making noise because we won’t change our candidate as PF. So if there is something fooling him, we as PF supporters from Pambashe will write a petition to say our President is Edgar Lungu,” Chitotela said.

“And we want to also appeal to the Central Committee to open nominations for the party Presidency immediately [Provincial] elections are done so that we can see those that are ready to challenge the President. The elections for President Edgar Lungu should happen before we go to the convention. The people in Pambashe gave me this message for the central committee that nominations for our Presidential candidate should start in May and be completed by 30th May so that in June, we would have known those who would like to challenge President Lungu. We want to see what those people are made of.”

Chitotela said the ruling party would not be changing its Presidential candidate just because some people were scared of him.

“They are telling us to look for another candidate, that President Lungu is not eligible. But they’re not supposed to be celebrating if Lungu is not eligible. Why are they so worried? If there is one person they (those opposing) are scared of, from North to South and East to West, is President Lungu. They know that President Lungu on the ballot paper in 2021 will win with more than 70 per cent. That is why they have risen the way they have baleti teti eminine (he can’t stand). But if he is not supposed to stand, shouldn’t you let him go ahead with the nominations so that he gets rejected properly? Why are you scared of him? It’s because you know very well that he will win,” said Chitotela.

Speaking at the same event, Phiri who was the guest of honour at this rally challenged the police to end violence in the country by arresting anyone involved in the vice.

“Dear youths, if you really know what you want, say no to being used as tools of violence. If anybody comes to you and asks you to engage in violence, tell them to go and bring their own children. I also want to challenge the police; the President who is your Commander-In-Chief has already directed you to act on people who are doing violence. The President has told you to arrest wrong doers; please don’t wait for anybody to give you instructions because the powers are in your hands,” said Phiri.

Meanwhile, Mwamba who is the party deputy chairman for national mobilisaion told Zambians that mealie meal prices would start reducing in the next two months.

“Don’t just to listen to PF who are saying ‘we need regime change’, regime change because of what? What has gone wrong? We know the economy is not doing very well. But it’s not only here [in Zambia]. For us who move around, just today the South African Rand has hit R16 against the US Dollar. Our Kwacha is also around K16. But just compare, which country is more advanced between South Africa and Zambia? But our currencies are at par; can’t you surely clap for President Lungu for what he’s doing? Then this issue of mealie meal, let me promise you, within two months, mealie meal prices are going to come down,” said Mwamba.

President Lungu is not eligible to stand for elections in 2021, KBF agrees with John Sangwa

0

Twenty twenty-one Presidential candidate, Kelvin Fube Bwalya, has advised President Edgar Chagwa Lungu not to be trapped by some people that are telling him that he is eligible to contest the 2021 presidential elections.

Discussing the Rule of Law on Prime TV live debate last night, Mr. Bwalya, who is commonly known as KBF, appealed to President Lungu to be wary and not to be cheated and used by some deceitful lieutenants who are pushing him to go for his third time presidential contest.

The prominent Zambian Lawyer and political strategist warned that doing so would be going against the republican Constitution.

He agreed with two other discussants, John Sangwa and Mulambo Haimbe, both lawyers, that President Lungu is not eligible to stand for elections in 2021 because he has already held the office of the presidency twice and elected to as President of Zambia twice as the Constitution prescribes.

Mr. Sangwa is a Constitutional lawyer and law tutor, while Mr. Haimbe is a practicing lawyer and parliamentary aspiring candidate for Lusaka Central constituency on the United Party for National Development (UPND) ticket.

The trio humbly appealed to President Lungu to respect clauses of the law of the land, which he personally accented to.

Mr. Bwalya further wondered why some learned lawyers would mislead the public by suggesting that President Lungu never held office after his election in 2015.
“President Lungu represented Zambia at international fora as republican President many times. So, why should someone argue that President Lungu did not hold office,” Mr. Bwalya wondered.

He warned that those insisting that President Lungu never held office could land the President into serious trouble with the law.
“If you say President Lungu never held office, are you saying he deceived the people of Zambia when he was representing us on international assignments? Let’s be serious when we are discussing national issues,” he warned.

Meanwhile, Mr. Bwalya reiterated his respect and love for President Lungu.

“My opinion on this eligibility issue is based on facts and respect for the rule of law. I have nothing against President Lungu. He’s my President and older brother. But all am saying is that the law does not permit him to stand for the third time because he has already been elected twice and held office twice,” Mr. Bwalya said.

Mr. Bwalya said the PF was still a viable political party and had done remarkably well in some aspects of national development. He, however, noted that the party needed a change of leadership to win the confidence of the people if it were to win 2021 elections.

“I have traversed the country and I know what the youth are saying. They are calling for new leadership of the party if we were to retain political power in 2021,” he said.

And Mr. Sangwa said he was not being political or partisan in expressing his strong opinion that President Lungu is not eligible to contest the 2021 presidential elections. He said his interest was to ensure that the rule of law was respected by all, including the President.
“Rule of law simply means no one is above the law. Not even the President. The Zambian law says if you have held office twice and elected twice, you are not eligible for a third time, period. Nothing personal. Even if it were another person, not necessarily Mr. Lungu, the law would still apply,” Mr. Sangwa observed.

Mr. Sangwa also thanked the PF Government and President Lungu for allowing free debate on the eligibility issue and Bill 10. This, he said, was as it should be in a democracy.

And Mr. Haimbe said the PF risked not having a candidate for 2021 presidential elections if the insisted on the candidature of President Lungu.

The UPND member said the opposition party would be so glad to partition President Lungu’s nomination because the incumbent is barred by current law.

A third force in politics will emerge if HH and UPND fail to up their game, warns Trevor Simumba

0

Trade Expert Trevor Simumba has predicted that a third force will emerge in Zambian politics If Hakainde Hichilema and the UPND fail to up their game and provide a visionary roadmap towards 2021 elections.

Mr Simumba predicted that a third force will arise in Zambia that will bring together all the disgruntled upright Zambian citizens from progressive members of PF, UPND and MMD if the UPND fails to up its game.

He charged that there is no sane right thinking Zambian today that believes another five years of President Edgar Lungu is the best option for Zambia.

”Everyone agrees he has been the worst President of this country supported by cowardly selfish corrupt Ministers and civil servants that have completely run down the treasury and the economy of Zambia,” Mr Simumba said.

”However, the longer UPND fail to galvanise a new leadership team around HH the more likely we will see a similar movement as we had in 1991 arising from the ashes and choosing a single candidate with the best chance of defeating the incumbent ruling party. You do not need to be a seer I to prophesy.“

He said Zambia is in serious jeopardy and there are many in PF and UPND that see the coming implosion if the country continue on this path.

“I say to those of my friends and relatives especially in the PF remember the courage of the late MCS, get out of your comfort zone and show your patriotism to the nation of Zambia. MMD get back to your ideals and unite for the sake of Zambia.“

Mr Simumba said Zambia needs a credible balancing third force in the country.

“UPND, Zambia needs a vibrant strong opposition that is focused on transforming the lives of all Zambians not just focused on making HH President. We are in deep trouble this is not a time for personal egos it is a time for genuine leadership to rise to the occasion.“

He added, “I know that RB, ABC, VJ, Magande and many other Zambian leaders who I know personally and have discussed issues with them before, are not happy with the current status of Zambia. Only Uncle VJ has spoken publicly the others are still talking quietly at their golf clubs, homes and churches. Stop it. Without real action you will doom this great nation of Zambia to disaster in your lifetime. Come out and speak truth to power.“

”Everyone including his own cadres know that President Lungu has failed and he must bow out peacefully and ensure the Zambian people have a free and fair election to make their choice. We cannot continue in this manner,” he said.

With or without Bill 10, Lungu is standing in 2021 – Mundubile

0

GOVERNMENT Chief Whip Brian Mundubile says whether or not Bill 10 is enacted, President Edgar Lungu is standing in 2021 because he is eligible.

And Mundubile has asked citizens to abandon the debate on President Lungu’s eligibility and concentrate their energies on much more productive things like contributing positively to the development of the country.

In an interview, Mundubile wondered why constitutional lawyer John Sangwa State Counsel was still advancing the same arguments which the Constitutional Court disagreed with during the President’s eligibility case in 2018.

“Those assertions are not true! We all know that the questions of President Lungu’s eligibility were settled in the ConCourt and I think that ruling is out and people can have recourse to it and understand what the Court has said. I think what was an issue that time was whether the time that the President served from the 25th of January, 2015 to September, 2016, as a term. That was what had to be established, and if you look at what was said in that judgement, clearly, that argument was put to rest. So, I don’t think that our focus has been on that particular matter. It, therefore, is not true that we are trying to bring up Bill 10 to make the President eligible when he is not because, according to the ConCourt judgement, he’s actually eligible,” Mundubile argued.

“Allow me to read part of the judgement. It says, ‘…it, therefore, follows that in the current case, the term served, which sits as tried to the pre and post-2016 Constitutional amendments and having looked at the intention of the legislature as we’ve done and the holistic approach we have taken in interpreting Article 106 of the Constitution in its entirety, our answer to the question that we have rephrased is that a Presidential term of office that runs from 25th January, 2015, to 13th September, 2016, and straddled two Constitutional regimes cannot be considered as a full-term…’ So, the question was whether he served a term or not; if he had served a term between 25th January, 2015, and 13th of September, 2016, and coupled with the current term, it means he would have served two terms, in which case he would have been ineligible. Now, the fact that the first question was answered not to be a term, it only goes to show that he has only served one term by the end of this term and, therefore, the Court didn’t even find it necessary to answer the second question. So, maybe that is where senior Counsel (John Sangwa) is trying to confuse people!”

Mundubile asked Sangwa to accept the ConCourt judgement as final and move on from President Lungu’s eligibility, saying there was no need for him to try and appear as a champion at “lesser platforms” when he failed to argue his points in court.

“I think the Court was very clear by the very fact that the Court ruled that the President didn’t serve for a term, it means that, that term doesn’t exist. So, I think there is no need to confuse ourselves on that because if you read the full judgement, you will realize that all the arguments that John Sangwa’s advancing now were also advanced in court and the Court didn’t agree with him. So, I think it’s not exactly prudent for him to find lesser platforms to try and advance the same arguments when you took them to court and the Court didn’t sustain you. You can’t then get the same argument and go to a lesser platform like the media where nobody is going to question you then you become a champion. I think that it was easier to become a champion in court by winning the case. So, when you lose a case and the courts don’t sustain your argument, it’s prudent to just accept and move on,” Mundubile added.

He urged citizens to ignore President Lungu’s eligibility issue and focus on developmental matters.

“If you look at some of these discussions, they’ve overshadowed everything else for the past five years and I think it’s not progressive. Let’s not position ourselves as a people that have nothing to do, people that will just want to pick on dead stories and revive them for purposes of relevance! I think we can be relevant in many other spheres that can contribute to human development. But if we are going to pick on dead topics, topics that have been resolved and want to appear as champions because there is no one to challenge us at that particular platform, I think it won’t help us in any way. I feel that this country is facing a number of challenges where many intelligent Zambians that we have, like State Counsel John Sangwa, can apply their minds and contribute to the development of this country. I think at individual-level, let’s begin to ask ourselves: ‘what am I doing to improve the livelihoods of people even in my private capacity? So that whatever we do every day should point in that direction. But if we are going to employ negative energy day-in, day-out, I think that posterity will judge us. Let’s not forget that our children are watching,” said Mundubile.

Zambia’s Constitutionalism put to test as President Lungu is technically knocked out of the 2021 polls

0

The debate on whether President Edgar Lungu qualifies to contest in the 2021 elections has put Zambia’s respect for the rule of law to test, reports Zambian Eye Correspondent.
President Lungu’s Patriotic Front party has resolved to have him as its sole presidential candidate for the much anticipated 2021 polls.

The matter was subject for discussion in a televised programme yesterday (12th March 2020) and constitutional experts unraveled the matter.
During the phone-in session of the programme many callers were asking as to what the country’s constitution say regarding the issue.

Conditional Lawyers maintain that he is no longer eligible, after having had been voted into the office of the president on two occasions.

After the death of President Michael Sata in 2014, Lungu was nominated as the PF Presidential candidate for the 2015 by-elections to determine who would finish off Sata’s term.

He won the election and was sworn into the highest office of the land on 25th January 2015.
He was then elected (again) for a full term in 2016, and assumed office on 13th September 2016.

According to law experts, on the technicality of having had been elected twice, Lungu does not qualify to seek a third term in 2021.
Background of the matter, political commentator Brebner Changala once told a local publication the other day, that the ruling party should search for someone who is eligible to contest in 2021 on its ticket.

He said the PF is misguided in thinking that Lungu qualifies banking their argument on a Constitutional ruling saying the very judgement they are basing on does not clearly states that Lungu is eligible.

According to the judgement whose verdict the PF is basing on, a president may only serve two terms. But, sections of the Constitution state that a third term of less than three years served as stand in president do not amount three terms and only applies to a Vice president who assumes office in an event of a vacancy.

The court could however not give ruling in the case of President Lungu who was not Vice president. It just interpreted what constitutes a term of office. That a person can occupy the office of the president for a period which is less than a full term (less than 3 years) in addition to two full terms.

In that regard, a person can take over an unexpired term and as long as the person do not serve more than three years in that unexpired term, it is not regarded as a full term which applies to the Vice president.

Meanwhile, Constitutional lawyer who has ignite the debate after a ConCourt ruling John Sangwa has maintained that President Lungu does not qualify to stand for another term.
He said Lungu was elected twice to the Presidential office and therefore according to the Constitution, he cannot seek a third term.

“You can’t have a third term, you can’t go for a third term. There is no provision for a third term in our Constitution,” he said during Television discussion where he was hosted together with a PF member who is also a lawyer Kelvin Bwalya Fube.

He urged the Electoral Commission of Zambia to reject Lungu’s nomination papers when he files them seeking to be elected for a third term.

He added that the other way to stop Lungu from contesting is by rejecting Bill 10, this bill has a provision that seeks to repeal the right to challenge the nomination of the Presidential candidate.

Fube who played a big role in Lungu’s election in both 2014 and 2016 also said he does not qualify to contest in 2021. He said LUNGU must think twice and avoid embrassing himself when his papers are rejected in nomination.

Fine who is also running to be adopted by the PF at the convention said there is still room for the party to rebrand by getting a new candidate.

ZCCM-IH sets gold buying price at K550/gramme

0

ZCCM-IH chief executive officer Mabvuto Chipata says talks with various companies outside Zambia are at an advanced stage to secure a viable market for the off-take of gold that will be due to be sold.

And Chipata has announced that ZCCM-IH will be offering a competitive price for gold from the local market, pegged at a starting price of K550 per gramme.

Meanwhile, Consolidated Gold Company Limited have invited all interested stakeholders to utilize a new, state-of-the art gold testing laboratory to ascertain the quantity and quality of gold mineral they may have as personal holdings to secure a market and the best possible sale price.

Addressing journalists following a media tour at the Consolidated Gold Company laboratory in Lusaka, Wednesday, Chipata said talks with various companies outside Zambia were at an advanced stage.

He was responding to a question on what progress ZCCM-IH had made in securing a viable market for the off-take of Zambian gold once the company was ready and in a position to commence sales.

“The aspect of off-takers, yes, as you know, as we buy the gold, we will need to sell. So, we are partnering with a number of companies outside Zambia, whom we are talking to already. I think we are near conclusion in terms of contracts for buying. And then, our partnership with Karma Mining, they are experts as well in this market. So, this is work that is ongoing, and we hope that we will be able to close a number of transactions very soon,” Chipata told journalists.

“We are also working with banks in this (gold) project. The whole value chain requires that you start from where you are buying; you need to look at the logistics; you need to look at the security; you need to look at the storage of the gold; the buyer and financing structure…so, this is a big project that we think that all the stakeholders, really, have got a part to play in this process.”

Asked how confident ZCCM-IH was at achieving their projected target of securing 40,000Kgs of gold, or 40 tonnes, in view of the security threats that halted the scoping exercise, Chipata expressed optimism given the progress made so far.

Teams comprising of ZCCM-IH, Ministry of Mines and Minerals Development and the Ministry of Home Affairs personnel were deployed to eight gold mining and panning sites across the country to undertake a scoping exercise, according to Chipata.

The exercise was, however, temporarily halted due to the fragile security situation over the last few weeks following the recent spate of gassing attacks in various areas of the country.

“How confident are we at achieving the target? You will appreciate that this is a project that we are doing for the first time. We know that Kansanshi Mine produces about 4,000-5,000Kgs of gold as we stand. The work we are doing now in terms of exploration will help us ascertain the quantities of gold that are on the ground, particularly, in Mwinilunga area (North-Western Province). In Rufunsa (District) as well, once we start exploration work, we will be able to ascertain the quantities that are there,” he replied.

“The information we have now is based on the information we have informally. So, we think that once we have done exploration work, we will be able to announce how much quantities we will discover in each of the areas as we go on during the year.”

And he announced that ZCCM-IH would be offering a competitive price for gold from the local market, pegged at a starting price of K550 per gramme.

“I must say that so far, our moving into the market to buy the gold, has been received favourably by the artisanal miners. We are offering a competitive price, starting from K550 per gramme, and depending on the purity using thorough technical assaying methods, the price may be higher. Compared to prices found on the ground ranging from K350 to K500, the price range we are offering compares favourably to this, but also to market prices as well, once the purity or gold content is determined,” Chipata announced.

Meanwhile, speaking earlier, Consolidated Gold Company Limited chief executive officer Faisal Keer invited all interested parties to utilize the new, state-of-the-art gold testing laboratory to ascertain the quantity and quality of gold mineral they may have as personal holdings to secure a market and best possible sale price.

“This laboratory is targeted at the operations we are setting up starting with Rufunsa where we are working with small-scale and artisanal miners there from the surrounding area. We have so far invested about US $250,000 in setting up this lab that will be able to process about 30 samples per day. The lab will also be open to the general public for them to come and have their samples tested from here,” said Keer.

“The next step in the project, as you saw, we have procured 10 milling plants to be set-up on the Rufunsa site and also some earth-moving machinery. The gold milling plants have a capacity of processing 30 tonnes per day and will be operational by the first week of April, 2020.”
The media tour was organized as part of efforts to sensitize all stakeholders of progress ZCCM-IH had made in the ongoing gold value chain project.

The company has started buying gold from artisanal and small-scale gold miners as one of the steps towards the formalization of gold mining and trading activities.
ZCCM-IH’s national target for gold from both primary and secondary sources is 40 tonnes or 40,000Kgs.

Sangwa on self-destructive path – Kampyongo

0

HOME Affairs Minister Stephen Kampyongo says it is not up to John Sangwa State Counsel to select who will stand as PF presidential candidate in 2021.

And Kampyongo says belonging to the ruling party is not an insulation from the law, warning those who want to protest against the arrest of a jerabo popularly known as Spax that they will be dealt with.

Meanwhile, Kampyongo says plans to move a motion to impeach Speaker of the National Assembly Dr Patrick Matibini are mischievous and will not see the light of day.

Speaking when he featured on PF’s interactive Forum, Sunday, Kampyongo said Sangwa had taken a self-destructive path.

“This kind of hypocrisy must not be tolerated. Because when you get a person who is learned as a lawyer to mislead the nation on such matters, it should not be taken lightly, an ordinary citizen it can be tolerated. In the ConCourt where these matters were deliberated on and decided upon, why does he want to come and create another court in the jungle? And start presenting the same issues that he was presenting when he was representing his colleagues? It is political interest. Learned Counsel Sangwa has taken a self destructive path and I think if we had a credible LAZ, these are matters they should tackle objectively and not selectively and not what their political emotions tell them, that should not be the case,” Kampyongo said.

“If SC Sangwa feels he is more learned, he should go back to court and make his argument because now he is politicking and that is why those of us who are politicians have taken him on. To try and start saying the President is not eligible, it is not his job. If he thinks that we who passed this Constitution do not understand it, it is only him who understands it, and he will be in his own world. All these schemes won’t help them. John Sangwa’s constitutional qualifications and interpretation of the law are his and solely belong to him and his family and his single vote. Mr Sangwa has not right whatsoever to decide who will stand as PF presidential candidate.”

And Kampyongo said there was no way police could have left Chingola residents to continue living in fear when suspects were known.

“I want to supplement the statement that was issued by the Inspector General to those on the Copperbelt and particularly Chingola who are agitating saying they want to protest over the arrest of one of the suspects in Chingola. Just as you thought that that suspect couldn’t be touched, the departure point for us is when someone engages in wrong doing even if they are our relatives, no one will be shielded. There are so sacred cows. The President made this very clear during his address. Party membership is not an insulation against the law. How many times have you heard the police say this murder suspect has murdered this one? Just wait, you will be told. We have to hear the cries of the people. People in Chingola lived in fear, why should we allow people to live in fear when the suspects could be known?” Kampyongo asked.

Meanwhile, Kampyongo said those scheming to impeach Dr Matibini were wasting their time.

“Those attempts to try and suggest that the Speaker must be removed is Brought In Dead (BID), it is a motion we regard as BID…The Speaker is required to make such pronouncements, it is not the first time that he is declaring a seat vacant. The fact that other institutions acted on those pronouncements, the Electoral Commission of Zambia (ECZ) they must have looked at the various pieces of legislation. So one interpretation must not be the one used to start suggesting and start politicking to say ‘no he exceeded his powers, he should be removed’, not that we are challenging the decision of the Constitutional Court, we are not. But the Speaker’s office is also insulated,” Kampyongo said.

“How many cases have been appealed against? For example, a decision made by the High Court to only be turned down by the Supreme Court, would you say the judge that passed the judgement at the lower court must then be removed from the High Court? How many judges would we have removed? So in making petty and emotional decisions like that cannot be tolerated in the governance system. And so the Speaker stands on firm ground, he has our support and like I have said that motion will not see the light of day because it is frivolous and mischievous…Go and tell those who are scheming that they are wasting time.”

Kampyongo insisted that the UPND MPs would be shocked that the Constitution Amendment Bill Number 10 would pass.

“We are telling them to come on board, they didn’t come on board and some of them have been consistent with their participation in the constitution making process like our colleagues in the UPND, when we teamed up with our colleagues in the MMD and came up with the current constitution, they were still saying it would fail. Because they don’t understand how Parliament works, during the first part of the deliberations, they went celebrating that the constitution has failed. I was deputy chief whip then and I could see that this is what happens when people are ignorant. We stayed through the night and the following day they were shocked that the constitution had passed. And they will still be shocked so it is up to them to redeem themselves this time around. It will still be done,” said Kampyongo.

And speaking during the same forum, Chembe PF member of parliament Sebastian Kopulande said the will of the people expressed in Bill 10 would pass.

“I am confident having sat on the Select Committee that scrutinized Bill 10 and interacted with 87 witnesses, over a period of seven weeks, in 27 meetings, I am confident that the will of the people as expressed in Bill 10 and the amendments that shall come will pass in the House,” said Kopulande.

Nevers Mumba should leave RB out of his failed Leadership in MMD, RB has moved on – Prince Ndoyi

0

Outspoken Movement for Multi-Party Democracy Youth Prince Ndoyi has advised Dr. Nevers Mumba to be grateful and stop exhibiting high levels of hatred, envy and jealousy to a man who picked him from the Country’s Political dustbin and made him Ambassador to Canada after being unceremoniously fired by Mwanawasa.

Reacting to Nevers Mumba’s Secretary Winnie Zaloumis who said the former Republican President Rupiah Banda was destabilizing the MMD, Ndoyi said Dr Mumba should desist from using his mouthpieces to attack the former President because when no one was willing to look at him it was Rupiah Banda who gave him a second chance by appointing him Ambassador to Canada.

“After Dr Mumba was fired by President Levy Mwanawasa as Vice President and expelled from the party for gross indiscipline, treachery and disloyalty to appointing authority he became a lepper politically. No one wanted to associate with him, but in 2008 when Mr Rupiah Banda became President of Zambia after the unfortunate demise of President Mwanawasa out of pity and with the help of the likes of Lameck Mangani appointed Nevers Mumba ambassador to Canada giving him a second chance at life. This is a man who was finished politically. Today Nevers Mumba has the audacity to smear insults at a man who recacitated his career and image in society.

“He will submerge and drown in his own hatred. Let him guide his workers the likes of Chitika and Zaloumis to refrain from including Rupiah Banda in thier narrow political rhetorics as that only robs him a chance to be taken seriously in his newly found political space,” he said.

He advised Dr Mumba to advise Ms Chitika and Ms Zaloumisi to refrain from including former President in their political discourse because it will force the youths to react.

“We have warned before and we want to warn him again, if that’s the route he has chosen to villify former President Rupiah Banda, he will force us to take him on politically and sadly he will not recover. Today they have gone on a spineless rampage harrasing everybody for vehicles they know not how they were bought and by who.

“How can a former President whose politically inactive destabilize the MMD. Why has he always lumped his failure to run MMD on an innocent man? Why has he held so much hatred and enmity for a man who picked him from the political dustbin with so much contempt. Let him reflect and desist.

“Instead of seeking retribution he has chosen to be confrontational and that will continue to bury him. Before it was Rupiah Banda and Edgar Lungu have hijacked MMD from me. Now it’s Rupiah Banda again. Let him face his real opponents Raphael Nakacinda, Gaston Sichilima and the group of members across the country,” he said

Zambian lives will be better after PF has left govt – Chief Hamusonde

0

 

ZAMBIANS will be better after the PF has left government, says chief Hamusonde.

In an interview chief Hamusonde of Bweengwa, west of Monze, said nearly all sectors of governance have been brutalised by the PF thus making the livelihood of citizens unbearable.

“If you look at the youths, they are a volcano boiling and may soon explode. Signs are already there of this boiling volcano. Look at women; they have been abused left, right and centre making their lives more miserable. The women are being chased even for selling free God-given mushrooms on streets in town. Look at the working society, look at civil servants, they are now scared to even mention their surnames for fear of being transferred or worse fired in the now PF popular ‘national interest’ clause,” he said. “Civil servants can’t even afford to effectively educate their children due to poor salaries. We, in the traditional leadership, have been divided by the PF because as long as you praise sing for President Edgar Lungu or bootlick some PF senior cadre then a GRZ VX lands at a palace with a heavy brown envelope. But I have all hope in that God does not let His people suffer for too long and I see Zambian lives becoming better and more prosperous without the PF in government. I see youths getting more jobs, I see a united and respected traditional leadership that will be empowered to help develop rural Zambia and the agriculture sector.”

Hamusonde (r) added that rural Zambia has vast potential but has been ignored by the PF which has turned some traditional leaders into beggars.

“Let them (PF) not get me wrong. I don’t hate them, there are some good leaders in that party but it’s the corruption that I hate, it’s the corrupt that I hate and I want all well-meaning Zambians to do the same for the sake of our children and posterity,” he said.

Hamusonde called on youths to resist being used by what he described as evil politicians who only reward them with beer after using them as tools of violence.

“As you celebrate your day (Youth Day) please say no to those who want to divide you against your own brothers and sisters on tribal lines. Say no to those evil politicians who just give you beer to gas or hack another innocent soul. We are all one and let’s remain so,” said Hamusonde.

 

Has Edgar Lungu Lost Control Of The Country’s Security? Asks UPND

0

 

 

When the UPND and other progressive citizens and organisations called on President Edgar Lungu to tame his violent Patriotic Front cadres as they were a danger to the rule of law, he accused us of being bitter and ignored our cry.

When we told Edgar Lungu to start by taking punitive action against his own violent cadres, his cabinet ministers and party officials pointed an accusing finger at the UPND as being violent.

When the Zambia police took action against PF cadres that created confusion in the Sesheke by-election, President Edgar Lungu reacted by firing the police officers that maintained law and order, thus instilling fear in the men and women in uniform.

When we advised President Edgar Lungu and the PF that they were creating a monster that would one day come to bite them, they did not listen but instead encouraged the gun culture among PF cadres.

When the UPND and other progressive citizens and institutions advised the Zambia Police to arrest the thugs that attacked an audience that was debating constitutional amendments at Hotel intercontinental, we were told there was no complainant in the case.

The fights that the nation witnessed during the youth day celebrations in Lusaka between rival PF gangs right in the presence of President Edgar Lungu ,his cabinet ministers and service chiefs just goes to prove our fears right that President Lungu has lost grip of not only his own party but also the security of the nation.

Those clashes in the presence of the Republican President and Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces only proves beyond reasonable doubt the UPND’s fears that law and order has completely broken down.

We demand henceforth that President Edgar Lungu wakes up from his slumber before his own violent youths place our peace and national security at risk.

Yesterday’s confusion rests right on the President’s back and we expect to see action from him.We expect nothing but either action against police top brass or arrest of the PF violent cadres.

This is unheard of in our country and we demand for immediate action before Zambians lose complete confidence in the man they call their President.

We cannot have cadres shedding blood in the presence of President Lungu and not even a single arrest made. This is absurd and a sign that indeed the police are afraid of the cadres. The police say that they are carrying out investigations. What furthermore investigations does Police Commissioner Nelson Phiri want to carry out when the crime was committed right in their faces. We demand for order and a return to normalcy in our country.

(c) UPND MEDIA TEAM

Leaders must never be intimidated by ideas – Pilato

0

HUMAN rights activist Fumba Chama says leaders and those that aspire to lead must never be intimidated by the ideas of those they lead.

Chama, aka Pilato, says the power of any idea is in its ability to live outside the mind that formed it because ideas must be shared.

In a series of tweets, Chama says he believes in the power of ideas.

“As a boy, it is the ideas that were passed on to me by my parents that guided me even when they were no longer there. We are all governed by ideas that were expressed in one way or another even when the initiators of these ideas are no more,” he wrote. “The idea of democracy still regulates & guides nations today even when the people that conceptualized it are dead & less known. The expression of these ideas have a potential to influence the direction we take as a country and so is the failure to express them. Even our own evolution as a species depends on what ideas we conceptualize and express. Where we are today is a result of the ideas that were entertained when they were expressed by those that lived before us. Our next level will be determined by what ideas we possess now.”

Chama stated that Zambia like any developing country must be alive to the fact that “our people are more than their smiles and heights”.

“The real substance of our people is in their minds and the ideas they possess. It is what they think that we must treasure because our power lies in there. Leaders and those that aspire to lead must never be intimidated by the ideas of those they lead. This is what democracy is expected to achieve when it proposes free expression. The power of any idea is in its ability to live outside the mind that formed it. Ideas must be shared,” he stressed. “Democracy allows for the competition of ideas. The internet today gives us a big advantage that many developed states never had when they were developing. With the internet our people can access and share information quickly and affordably. This advantages our democratisation.”

Chama stated urged processing and instead of closing the space to protect individual privileges of politicians.
“We should be advocating for even a more open space to accommodate the bigger population of our people who are still not covered. With the internet, education is more accessible now,” he noted. “My appeal to the Zambian people is that…numbers don’t mean anything if the only ideas you tolerate are of the few amongst yourselves. The power of numbers is in the number of contributions that you get from all of them. The internet makes this sharing of ideas easier. The statement by President Lungu and his minister on social media abuse has a potential to instill fear in the public and in the end many will be intimidated to express their thoughts on key national issues. The danger here is that we will continue surviving on old thoughts.”

Chama stated that while many had abused social media, the opposite is true also.

“Many of us have used it well and have continued to do so. The problem is we will never benefit from the ideas of those who will fear to express themselves on key issues,” wrote Chama. “My prayer and wish is that…we the people will defend our right to express ourselves on social media and outside of it. Humanity is expressive and we must never be intimidated out of it. God Bless you and God bless Zambia.”

PF wants to use Bill 10 to prevent a challenge to Lungu’s nomination – Akafumba

0

THE PF want to use Bill 10 to completely remove Article 50 of the Constitution to block the opposition from challenging the nomination of President Edgar Lungu for the 2021 presidential elections, says Josephs Akafumba.

And Akafumba, who is NDC vice-president, says President Lungu, being a lawyer, knows that he does not qualify for the 2021 presidential elections.

In an interview, Akafumba, a prominent lawyer and former justice permanent secretary, said even a student of Constitutional Law can conclude that the Constitution Court judgment does not make President Lungu eligible.
“Any attempt to field President Lungu in 2021 will be a serious breach of the constitution to which the returning officer has all powers to disallow. However, should the returning officer accept the nomination, we will challenge it. Now being fully aware that the opposition may challenge President Lungu’s nomination, they have covered themselves under Bill 10 by completely or attempting to remove Article 50 in the Constitution which gives power to any person to challenge the nomination of a candidate, so that what only remains is that you can only challenge the results,” he said.

“So this is where the entire Bill 10 hangs on. It hangs on the eligibility of President Lungu because they know very well that if they leave the Constitution the way it is, his candidature will be challenged. So for once let’s learn to follow our Constitution and it is for this reason that all Zambians, especially our MPs should stand up and reject Bill 10 because it is meant to facilitate the 3rd term for President Lungu,” Akafumba said.

He indicated that the ConCourt judgment on the eligibility of President Lungu read or by use of sign language, does not make him eligible.

Akafumba added that it was not the first time that the PF had violated the constitution.

He noted that even the PF constitution had been neglected by President Lungu.

“The Mulungushi convention which elected Mr Lungu violated the PF constitution through the showing of hands, elbows and even nodding to elect Mr Lungu,” he said.

“The question posed by Dan Pule and his colleagues for determination by the Concourt reads as follows: “Whether His Excellency President Edgar Chagwa Lungu will have served two full terms for purposes of Article 106 (3) as read with 106 (6) of the Constitution of Zambia at the expiry of his current term.’ Now what should be of interest to Zambians is that the ConCourt tactically changed this question to read as follows: ‘Whether in terms of Article 106 (3) and (6) the President’s term that ran from 25th January 2015 to 13th September 2016 and straddled two constitutional regimes can be considered as a full term’. This is what they did. We are not quarrelling with ‘Term’, Term is five years, no one is bothered about that. From there you can see that when they rephrased the question, President Lungu was removed as a person, whether he qualifies to stand. What they where determining was the Presidential term…the exclusion clause is not term. Exclusion clause is holding office. There is nowhere in the judgment that the ConCourt says that President Lungu qualifies,” said Akafumba.

Tanzania to compel men to pay housewives for domestic labor

A proposal will go before Tanzania’s parliament asking it to compel 40% of the monthly salaries of husbands to be paid into the accounts of housewives.

The proposal is the brainchild of the Regional Commissioner for Dar-es-Salaam, Paul Makonda. He believes the measure would help alleviate the frustrations of domestic labor and child upbringing.

Like many parts of the world, Tanzanian women are not as financially secure as their male counterparts. On top of that, they are expected to fulfill domestic labor.

Nairobi News reports that Makonda revealed his intention during the celebration of International Women’s Day at the weekend.

“I will petition the National Assembly to introduce a law that will enable 40 percent of salaries of men in formal employment deducted and credited to the bank accounts of their spouses who are housewives,” Makonda reportedly said.

He even went further to put out a toll-free number that he says “depressed” women could call to seek help.

Makonda’s proposal, even before it is composed into a bill before parliament, is undoubtedly controversial. Even by western progressive standards, this is a huge request.

A largely conservative and patriarchal society, Tanzania has in recent times come in for international condemnation after its government enacted a law that prohibits pregnant young women from going to school.

The crackdown on pregnant schoolgirls began more than two years ago. Initially, public education authorities constituted a task force to arrest pregnant young women in schools.

President John Magufuli, a self-described disciplinarian, has defended his government’s hard stance against teenage motherhood.

Early this year, the World Bank was forced to withhold a $500 million loan to Tanzania over protests of the government’s ban of pregnant girls and young mothers from public schools.

It was not the first time Tanzania had to lose funds from the World Bank as a result of its stiff laws against pregnant schoolgirls. There was another incident in 2018.

The stern regulation against pregnant students is a manifestation of deeply held beliefs about the place and role of women. These come from traditional norms that are still very popular in the country.

Indeed, the regulations that seek to keep young pregnant women out of school make no room for any correctional measures against the men who got them pregnant.

In a similar fashion to banning young women from school, the Tanzanian government, last year, went to court to defend old cultural institutions that support child marriage.

The court, in an earlier ruling, quashed child marriages, referring to them as unconstitutional. But the government claimed that child marriages actually protect young women who are impregnated out of wedlock.

Child rights activists argued that the practice was exploitative and had forced so many young girls into subservience.

The court upheld its ruling.

Makonda’s hopes are well-intentioned. But in order to see things come to fruition, Makonda has to overcome local customs etched in a traditionalism that is sometimes seen as anti-colonialist or anti-imperialist.

All the same, one may say it is a welcome surprise that one of the most radical proposals to empower women is coming from one of Africa’s most conservative countries.

PF uses Spax and now want to discard him

0

By Anthony Bwalya – UPND Member

For the record, the regime should either present Spax before the courts or release him.

This is the arbitrary application of the law we have always condemned. The same brutality they applied against Mr. Hakainde Hichilema is the same brutality they are applying against Kabaso Mulenga.

I have a lot of sympathies for Kabaso SPAX Mulenga. I also have a lot of sympathies for many intelligent, enterprising, hardworking young men like him, who push the boundaries of limitations to build a life for themselves and their families.

For the record, Spax and many youths like him are victims of the brutality of the failed leadership of the Patriotic Front. The PF always knew, that youths on the Copperbelt were always going to demand a fair share of the spoils of the earth in that region, and that they were never going to stand and watch corrupt government politicians plunder our national resources while they continued begging for handouts.

That is how they demanded for the #BlackMountain to be given to them, even without the most basic legal protections.

Spax and the youths on the Copperbelt, Chingola and Kitwe to be specific, knew, that because of their appetite for corruption, the PF leadership would always play ball over the Black Mountain.

If the PF had not given Spax and the youths on the Copperbelt, permission to work with the Black Mountain, these youths by now, could have erupted and demanded for their removal from power. These youths could never have stood by and watched the plunder of national resources by PF officials while they got nothing.

In other words, Black Mountain was a bribe to keep the youths silent as government officials stole on a grand scale.

The PF cannot remain in power without the support of Spax and his team. And they know it.

Except now, the PF have amassed too much money from numerous acts of grand, politically motivated corruption, that they now think they can dispense with Spax and the “Jerabos” on the Copperbelt.

This is why the regime can now afford to arrest and detain Spax. The PF do not feel they need Spax anymore.

In the months ahead, the regime, in an attempt to strengthen it’s grip on power, will try and neutralize the command of people like Spax and his team.

But this will also give the youths on the Copperbelt, an opportunity to see that they have been used and played by the regime.

There are members of the regime who want a piece of the Black Mountain. But before they can lay their hands on it, they must first neutralize Spax.

The problem here is not Spax. The problem is the regime.

Chitotela wants People who want to Challenge President Lungu at the convention be identified and dealt with

0

Minister of Tourism and Pambashe Member of Parliament is, allegedly on behalf of his constituency, petitioning the ruling Patriotic Front’s highest organ, the Central Committee, to open the party’s Presidential Nominations in the month of May for only a period of 30 days so that the party can easily identify those that are opposed to the sole candidacy of the incumbent President Edgar Lungu and only for a period of 30 DAYS

Speaking at the Lusaka Patriotic Front Youth Rally, Thursday, Mr. Chitotela petitioned the Central Committee, through the Deputy Secretary-General Mrs. Mumbi Phiri, to open and close the Presidential nominations way ahead of schedule of the 10th to 12th July 2020 PF General Conference, adding that the opening up will allow the party to know who is behind Lusaka Lawyer and State Counsel John Sangwa’s push to take President Lungu’s eligibility issue to the constitutional court.

Mr. Chitotela said that the opening up of nominations is the only way the party can cleanse itself against those working to undermine the 2021 candidature of President Edgar Chagwa Lungu.

“I am a bearer of a message from the Patriotic people of Pambashe who have asked me to deliver their message. There is no way you can allow the PF Presidential Nominations to open and close during the General Conference. How else would you expose those who are working with Sangwa(po) to undermine the candidature of His Excellency, President Edgar Chagwa Lungu,” said Hon Chitotela.

“If there is a man the entire opposition in Zambia is afraid of facing in the Ballot, it is President Edgar Chagwa Lungu. And that is why they are working to question his 2021 candidature because had he been a weaker opponent, they would have ignored him all the way to the Ballot. They are very scared! And that is why we should expose them before the General Conference.”

However, Ruling PF deputy secretary-general Mumbi Phiri has said that even those who will declare presidential interests at the 11th hour are free to challenge Presidency Edgar Lungu for the party leadership at the general conference.

Speaking to the media, Ms Phiri said those wishing to challenge President Lungu would not be harassed at the conference. She said, for now, she was not aware of anyone that had expressed interest to challenge the President, but even last-minute announcements would still be welcome.

“It’s their democratic right whether they show interest in the 11th hour, that is their democratic right because the convention doesn’t stipulate as to when you could.

I don’t think PF will nominate Lungu as its 2021, as he doesn’t qualify – Milupi

0

OPPOSITION Alliance spokesperson Charles Milupi says there is no way President Edgar Lungu can win next year’s elections if the Electoral Commission of Zambia does the right thing.

Milupi, who is also Alliance for Democracy and Development leader, has indicated that the opposition alliance is looking forward to free and fair general elections in 2021.

“All we are looking forward to is to have free and fair elections. That is why we are putting pressure on the Electoral Commission of Zambia to do the right thing. If the right thing is done, there is no way Mr Lungu can win at all,” he said.

“But if they depend on rigging and manipulating of results, that’s a different matter. But if we make sure that everything is transparent, there is no way Mr Lungu can beat anyone in the opposition alliance. Even PF itself, I don’t think they will nominate him (President Lungu) as a candidate.”

The ADD leader described assertions that the opposition was afraid of President Lungu’s candidature as mere ‘posturing’ by those in the PF.

“They are just posturing, we hear of so many senior people in PF that are already positioning themselves to do something different; we know that,” he said.

He clarified that it was not the opposition that was saying President Lungu does not qualify to contest next year, but the law.

“It is the Constitution; eminent constitutional lawyers have stated very clearly that he does not qualify. State Counsel (John) Sangwa has explained clearly that the Constitution says a person who has held office twice cannot contest. Anyone knows that President Lungu held office from 2015 to 2016 and held office from 2016 to date. But how the Constitution can be interpreted differently? I don’t know,” Milupi said.

He insisted that the judgment of the Constitutional Court on President Lungu’s eligibility to contest the 2021 elections was very clear.

“The Constitutional Court said that in terms of the eligibility, they had not made a ruling on that. In Zambia, we don’t read; we just debate even when we can read very short articles like the judgment of the Constitutional Court. At no time did they say that President Lungu is eligible to stand. So what the opposition alliance is doing is following the law. If the law says you can’t stand, you can’t stand,” he said.

Milupi believes President Lungu would be the easiest candidate to defeat because in townships and villages people were totally fed up with his leadership.

“So anyone who says the opposition alliance is afraid of Mr Lungu because he is a very strong candidate, first of all, he is a very weak candidate, Zambians react to how they are treated,” he said.

“When you are making an interpretation of the defence of the Constitution, you don’t look at who is weak and who is strong; you look at what the law says. The Constitution says he cannot stand because he has held office twice. Even himself, if he has any love for the country, he would say ‘yes, I have done my part; things haven’t gone so well. Let me go and rest (and) let someone else take up the mantle.’”

Milupi said a crisis would be created by the PF President Lungu prevails to remain in power owing to him being a boss of the electoral body and forces it to accept his nomination as there would be a flood of petitions on that.

“At that time the court will come up with a ruling that Mr lungu does not qualify and PF will not have a candidate because the nomination period would have closed and they will not allow their party not to have a candidate,” Milupi said.

” The PF will not allow a situation where by the candidate that they will put up will be disqualified by the court of law. You will not hear lawyers saying Mr Lungu qualifies, they are saying the opposite because that’s what the law says.”

Meanwhile, on President Lungu’s contemplation to set up a commission of inquiry on the chemical gassing incidents in the country, Milupi wondered how the Head of State could think of doing such when all he needed to do was to act on a report based on the findings of the Office of the President.

“He cannot articulate himself on gassing, he cannot tell us what is going on, he comes up with this statement that he wants to put up a Commission of Inquiry about gassing! He does not need to spend money on this commission of inquiry; he needs to call the Office of the President, Special Division. They already have reports, I am sure he also has a report,” said Milupi.

“Act on the reports from the OP. The reason we are talking about a commission of inquiry and so on…. These are delaying tactics because they know who is involved. Their scheme to implicate the opposition has immensely backfired. Looking at the people who have been arrested for this gassing, who are they? Are they not associated with the same people in power? How can you run a country like that and you think that Zambians love these people so much that we in the opposition alliance could be afraid of them?”

The Lungu eligibility debate is a distraction – Elias Munshya

0

I am writing this, purely out of a desire for us as a people to band together on real issues that matter for our time. We have Bill 10 to deal with, and our concentration on the eligibility question that has already been decided will only go to weaken our collective effort to defeat this evil Bill. Bringing back this eligibility issue and re-litigating it before the public falls into the hands of the PF who would much instead make us be pre-occupied with something that has already been decided. Instead of going back to the past and try to correct the eligibility decision, I am proposing that we band together to resist President Lungu’s effort to push through with Bill 10 – a Bill that would destroy Zambian democracy.

Edgar Lungu is eligible to stand in 2021. This is not my position. I do not even agree with this. But this is the law of the land as stated by the Constitutional Court in the Daniel Pule and others v. Attorney General case. I find it quite alarming that some well-meaning colleagues both within the profession and outside the profession of lawyers are peddling this idea that somehow the Pule case was unclear about Lungu’s eligibility. I do realise the frustration with the leadership of President Lungu. He is presiding over a failing economy. The kwacha is in free fall, and people are turning on each other while he is busy fiddling his hands, eating beans in the presence of self-ordained “commanders”, who are alleged to be gassing our people in Kitwe and Chingola. The kongola twibe government has borrowed more than we can ever afford to pay back. It is the kaloba government par excellence. Lungu’s failures should be enough reason why he should not stand in 2021, or why he should resign immediately and leave power for someone else.

And so, I do understand the frustration of our people. But frustration is not law. Crucially, we must not disrespect the rulings of the court or claim that a court has not ruled on a question when, in fact, the court has done so. I cannot in good faith, pretend as if the Pule case was unclear. It was clear. What did the Pule case say?

There is a school of thought which is saying that the Pule case did not pronounce itself on Lungu’s eligibility. It did. Specifically, the court held that the term of office from 2015 to 2016, which straddled two constitutional dispensations was not a full-term within the meaning of Article 106 of the Zambian constitution. I wonder though what is unclear about this clear holding of the Constitutional Court which clearly spells out the fact that Lungu’s presidential term from 2015 to 2016 cannot be computed when counting the presidential term limits. The honour of the legal profession places an expectation upon us as members of the bar to be truthful at least concerning rudimentary issues such as this!

In the Pule case, the Constitutional Court further held that they could not answer the second question regarding a specific pronouncement on Lungu because it had become “otiose”. Of course, it had become otiose given what was decided earlier in the first question.

I am not saying that citizens cannot disagree with what the Constitutional Court ruled in the Pule case; all I am saying is that we all must admit that the court did pronounce itself on Lungu’s eligibility. I have personally disagreed with the rulings of Zambian courts, and I have not hesitated to let it be known. One thing I would not do, however, is to claim that my opinion is Zambian law. No matter how brilliant or bright we claim to be; our opinions remain just that – opinions. They do not become Zambian law. The rulings of the judges are what constitute the case law that forms precedents in Zambian law.

Some of our people are arguing that they can disqualify Lungu in 2021 on a technicality. I do not think that the Constitutional Court will reverse itself in 2021. It is inconceivable that a court which has ruled that the 2015 to 2016 term cannot be counted when computing term limits, will now disqualify the president who was ruling during those particular years.

If we do not respect the Constitutional Court’s Pule decision, we will have no reason to respect its decision in the Matibini case, or the Minister’s payback our money case. To enhance our commitment to the rule of law, we must first agree that decisions of the Constitutional Court, no matter how disappointing, are still part of Zambian law.

For now, we are all clear. Lungu is a disaster, and so is his kelenka presidency. One thing though that must be clear is that the Daniel Pule case was clear about Lungu’s eligibility in 2021. If his party decides to adopt him as their candidate, I would advise all Zambians altogether to reject this clueless president via the ballot box. As for the immediate need, I would much instead use all the resources to fight Bill 10; than spend any ounce of energy on making pseudo arguments that Lungu somehow can not stand in 2021. He can. But as a voter, you have the power to retire him. Will you?

The author, Elias Munshya, can be reached at elias@munshyalaw.com/SM

UPND STRESSING HH…making him vulnerable to ‘criminals’ – Sikaile Sikaile

0

GOOD governance activist Sikaile Sikaile says the UPND is stressing their leader Hakainde Hichilema and making him vulnerable to PF lunatics.

He says there is a lot of work to be done ahead of 2021 elections adding the UPND should go deeper and uproot PF’s roots of injustice.

Sikaile reminded the UPND and all opposition political parties in Zambia to forget about winning the election simply because there is poverty in Zambia.

“There are certain times I don’t just get it seeing Hakainde Hichilema every time responding even to simple lunatics like Bowman Lusambo and Sunday Chanda when there are a lot of people who can squarely handle these dishonest human beings even at ward level,” he said in a statement yesterday. “You are stressing your leader and making him more vulnerable to criminals who know nothing about democracy. I have seen Edgar Lungu parading his minions labeling HH with all sorts of accusations and Lungu will be clapping in the background. My question is where are UPND MPs and other officials to defend President HH?”

Sikaile said the “rubbish going on in Parliament” when Zambians are dying should have been stopped by now at all costs but “it is about how equipped all your MPs are”.

“At the level Zambia has reached, duty execution must be observed in a dependable political grouping like UPND. If I may ask Mr HH, how many reports have you received from your office after every election? Because how do you plan for the next election when you haven’t received reports on how that particular election was conducted and what exactly went wrong?” he wondered. “Every time we just hear PF have stolen votes. They stole because as thieves, they plan on how to steal citizens’ will. In case your leaders have not told you Mr HH, next year Zambians don’t want excuses that PF have stolen their votes. So if you were doing nothing about it, you better change the formula. My appeal is that everyone who has a position should do their part so that others don’t stress out. If UPND will again handle the PF government the way they did in 2016 and during the trumped up treason charge of Hakainde Hichilema and five others, then let UPND not waste citizens’ energy.”

Sikaile said NDC was also stressing out Chishimba Kambwili a lot.

“Let him focus on other issues and not every time responding to thieves and lunatics,” he advised. “In addition, each one should stick to one specific issue. For example, I have been observing the consistency of a Mr Percy Chanda who is chairman for labour in UPND. It seems he understands his job very well. Look at how PF corrupt government is doing it though I don’t say you should go their way but just learn something.”

Sikaile said looking at how things are moving in the country, the UPND being the largest opposition political party with a candidate that Zambians could be banking on should be more strategic to get what they were looking for.

“There is a lot of work to be done to chuck out criminals come 2021. Our election won’t be based on the current life threatening poverty brought by the PF government,” he said. “Winning the elections in 2021 is about being able to track down and counter attack the heavy rigging schemes the corrupt PF government led by Edgar Lungu have put in place. UPND tend to get so relaxed most time going off the beat and giving chance to criminals like PF to re-plan for more evil activities.”

Sikaile noted that even during the gassing episodes, the PF managed everything and that “it is clear that there was planning from the beginning whether bad or good”.

“There is absolute nothing good PF government can plan for our nation apart from destruction. Zambians can vote for UPND just like they did in 2015 and 2016 but are you ready to protect their votes if you can give up on a Chilubi Constituency rigging scheme just like that?” asked Sikaile. “Remember, these guys have destroyed Zambia and they are aware that if you take over leadership, their homes will be prisons. The violence we have witnessed before, next year it will be worse if we citizens don’t act quickly that is why I have called on UN and the International Community to come in as soon as possible to also facilitate for the reforms of Zambia Police, ECZ (Electoral Commission of Zambia) and the judiciary. And all I have seen from the UPND is muteness thinking gassing is over. There is something wrong here and UPND you better fix it as soon as possible because you are dealing with sophisticated people who are eager to do anything to our nation including your leader.”

Nomination Clause Vs Immunity Clause: Appending Constitution Challenge And Debate Ahead Of 2021 Presidential Election

0

NOMINATION CLAUSE VS IMMUNITY CLAUSE: APPENDING CONSTITUTION CHALLENGE AND DEBATE AHEAD OF 2021 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION

WHEN we say our Constitution has so many manipulative gaps in favour of the incumbent and that NDF was a kids’ play, others call us names.

If truly NDF was there to refine the 2016 Constitution and not to incorporate and insulate their interests, such glaring and observable lacunae would not have been left unattended to.

Our Constitution seems to suggest that it is easier to challenge a non sitting president’s nomination than a sitting President who remains President and enjoys immunity even during the nomination period.

For instance Art 52 (4) allows “a person to challenge, before a court the nomination of a candidate within seven days of the close of nominations and the court shall hear the case within 21 days of its lodgement”.

This means that any presidential candidate who files in his/her nominations papers before the Returning Officer can be challenged/sued in the courts of law should any person feel that their nomination is undesirable or the nominee does qualify.

However, Art 98 (1) seems to exempt a sitting/incumbent President from this court challenge.

It guides that ” a person shall not institute civil proceedings against the President or person performing executive functions, as provided in Art 109, in respect anything done or omitted to be done by the President or that person in their private capacity during the tenure of Office as President”.

This is so because Art 106 (2) dictates that “a President (incumbent) shall hold office from the date the President-elect is sworn into office and ending on the date the next President-elect is sworn into office.”

Art 106(2) suggests that the incumbent President continues to be President and enjoys immunity against any lawsuit be it civil or criminal and any court case against him/her triggers the provisions of Art 98 (1).

With the pending nomination challenge against the incumbent President over his eligibility question, isn’t this another area of debate in our country?

To worsen the matters, Bill 10, which intends to repeal Art 52 and remove the nomination challenge clause, is not the panacea to this pending Constitution confusion.

Zambia therefore needs a constitution overhaul to reposition our constitution again.

Let us wait and see how the legal minds will lockhorns at the right time over this issue. This is food for thought for all Zambians.

I submit

By McDonald Chipenzi
Electoral Expert