Shishuwa’s Poisoned Pen is a Clear Indication of a Scholar Turned Political Mercenary

10

Shishuwa’s Poisoned Pen is a Clear Indication of a Scholar Turned Political Mercenary

By Abuild Mubanga

There comes a time in every nation’s journey when its people must stand up to protect truth from propaganda, scholarship from political pollution, and hope from those determined to poison it.

Dr. Sishuwa Sishuwa, once a respected academic voice, has sadly become nothing more than a hired pen for political losers, economic plunderers, and bitter elites desperate to return Zambia to the days of plunder and impunity.

His latest article, _“The fear of losing power corrupts those who wield it,”_ is a malicious distortion of Zambia’s political and economic reality, laced with bitterness, conjecture, and an obvious agenda to discredit a President who has chosen the difficult road of national reconstruction over populist deception.

To claim that Hakainde Hichilema “fooled” Zambians into believing he was a reformist is not just an insult to the President—it is an insult to the millions of voters who overwhelmingly chose him in 2021.

*These were not gullible fools; they were citizens tired of a corrupt regime that brought Zambia to its knees through theft, violence, and economic sabotage.*

HH did not rise by deceit—he rose on the promise of restoring dignity, cleaning the rot, and placing the country back on the path of economic sanity. And that is exactly what he has been doing.

Yes, the road has been tough. But governance is not a fairy tale—it is a complex balancing act, especially when you inherit a nation that was bleeding on every level. HH has worked to stabilize the currency, attract credible investment, restructure Zambia’s debt, restore rule of law, and ensure peace.

He has done this without violence, without censorship, and without the dictatorial tendencies that defined the PF government—yet Shishuwa dares to brand him a despot. What hypocrisy!

It is under HH that defamation of the president was repealed—a brave democratic step no previous government ever attempted. It is under HH that freedom of expression has flourished. It is under HH that no journalist has been killed, beaten, or hounded out of the country.

Political parties operate freely. Opposition leaders like Fred M’membe and Sean Tembo insult the President daily with zero consequences—and yet somehow, we are supposed to believe we are under dictatorship?

Shishuwa’s biggest crime is intellectual dishonesty. He deliberately overlooks the global economic realities—from the COVID-19 aftershock to the Ukraine-Russia war—and pretends HH’s government should have reversed all PF damage in under four years. That is not analysis. That is activism—paid activism with a bitter taste of sour grapes.

He cries about corruption, yet under HH, even UPND-aligned officials have been arrested, suspended, or investigated. That’s a break from the PF tradition where corrupt ministers were shielded by State House. The Anti-Corruption Commission is working, the FIC is unshackled, and the judiciary is freer than ever before.

But Shishuwa wants you to believe that nothing has changed—because in his world, change must mean his preferred tribe, friends, or class benefiting.

He dares speak of fear, yet it is PF that ran the country on fear. Remember gassing, hacked body parts, and markets burnt for political gain? Today, Zambia is calm. Markets are being rebuilt, schools are receiving desks, and CDF is empowering communities like never before.

The UPND government is building—not stealing—and that alone is a revolution in Zambia’s public service culture.

*The truth is this: Hichilema is not afraid of losing power—he is afraid of leaving Zambia in the same mess he found it in. And that fear is noble.*

He is not panicking—he is working. He is not desperate—he is deliberate. Deliberate in growing agriculture. Deliberate in stabilizing power generation. Deliberate in enhancing accountability. Deliberate in protecting democracy from both the PF vultures and pseudo-intellectuals like Shishuwa, who have sold their conscience to the highest bidder.

Dr. Sishuwa, if you have personal grief, take it up with God. Do not package political vendetta as academic critique. We know you. You never write about PF criminality, never question Edgar Lungu’s return, You only bark at HH because you know he will never use the state to shut you up—yet that freedom is exactly what proves he is not the dictator you paint him to be.

Zambia is not a failed state. It is a state recovering from failure. A failure authored by the very people Shishuwa defends. And Hakainde Hichilema is not the failure—he is the reformer. He is not the threat—he is the shield. He is not the panicked man—he is the adult in the room.

Zambians must ignore the Shishuwas of this world. They are not prophets. They are not patriots. They are polished mercenaries in academic robes.

Let them write their bile. Let HH continue to build. Because when the dust settles, history will not remember the bitter scribblers—it will remember the brave reformers.

And on that note, President Hakainde Hichilema will be remembered as the man who chose the harder path—and walked it with purpose.

10 COMMENTS

  1. Don’t stress yourself,we are aware.the same numbers that voted against HH are the ones making noise.our numbers are intact if not increased,just as it was prior to the previous election they made it difficult for themselves to believe that the silent voters can usher in HH.

    • It was not only Sishuwa alone who attacked PF misrule.Everyone in Zambia and outside condemned PF madness when even a traffic obstruction could earn you a death sentence!!To argue that Sishuwa should not be cited for his current biases because he criticized PF in the past is a misnomer and fails logic.Sishuwa has his own ideal type of governor he wants and will distort his academic findings to take advantage as an influencer.Unfortunately,there are other pundits equal to task to right him

  2. Sishuwa Sishuwa doesn’t even stay in Zambia, he doesn’t know how much Zambia has developed since he left, even villages now have decent school classrooms, local courts, police stations, clinics and staff houses. When he comes to visit his village, he may even forget it. So kumuleka fye, aka imwena umwine nga aisa.

  3. Citizen, you are right, Sishua is writing based on past experience of PF misrule transferring that to UPND.He doesn’t live in Zambia so his research on what he writes simingly in angry state has very much limited data.He does lengthy writing but one can easily see that the social scientist has lost track of what is on the ground here.Firstly his writing is like wanting to impress a master some where with a lot of gaps and mixed up concocted rigmarole with intent to upset some readers.He is left behind by new developmental occurances in the country, be on infrastructure, legal and governance.His source of information is a biased one so he writes using such disoderly art work full of tautology and false hoods and character assassination.I even doubt if he will come here any time soon.Zambians have a lot of questions for him which he will need to give reasonable answers.Let us wait for his next submission.

  4. While defamation was in effect I never knew there was sedition, hate speech, or insult being enforced. Please avoid ad hominem attacks. Sishuwa writes lucidly without resorting to parochial zeal.

  5. Sishuwa is the people’s collective voice. He writes what the people are feeling because not each and every individual can write his or her feelings therefore they leave it to him to be their voice.

    • Sishuwa speaks with fellow academicians not you.Like Citizen has highlighted, Sishuwa does not live here.Ask him about the impact of CDF,he will fail to mention any two CDF recipient communities in Mongu his “hometown”

  6. Dr. Sishuwa Sishuwa’s writings lack accuracy and integrity, reflecting bitterness and resentment. His academic platform appears to be leveraged for criticizing and undermining the government by spreading misleading information and propaganda that can mislead the public.

    When he critiques the government, it would be more constructive to offer a balanced perspective, highlighting how certain aspects were previously positive and have since deteriorated under the UPND regime. Similarly, if the democratic space has declined under the UPND government, can Dr. Sishuwa illustrate how it thrived under the previous PF administration? Dr. Sishuwa misuses his academic writing by making unfounded claims aimed at misleading opposition political parties, which also excel in false statements.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here