STATE FUNERAL IMPASSE, THE PROBLEM AND THE SOLUTION. THE ANALYSIS.

8

STATE FUNERAL IMPASSE, THE PROBLEM AND THE SOLUTION. THE ANALYSIS.

🧭 I. THE CONFLICT
The tragedy of most conflicts, whether political, social, or global, is the failure of opposing sides to consider the other’s perspective. Each group often believes they are the reasonable party, while the other is unreasonable. This entrenched thinking leads to stalemates, emotional outbursts and sometimes and decisions that deepen wounds rather than heal them, leading to destruction and lost of lives.

Zambia is witnessing such a moment in the unfolding standoff surrounding the funeral of former President Edgar Chagwa Lungu. The government and the grieving family both feel wronged and justified in their positions. Instead of dialogue, we are now seeing demonization, suspicion, and emotional escalation, all deeply regrettable at a time when unity and dignity should prevail.

⚖️ II. THE SOURCE OF THE CONFLICT
The impasse over President Lungu’s funeral has been shaped by a complex history of political rivalry, perceived injustices, and mutual mistrust. Emotions are understandably high. Both sides feel aggrieved by how they were treated when the other held power.

As civic activists, we had planned to launch a “Bury ECL in Zambia” campaign to push for dialogue and reconciliation. However, following the emergence of a controversial leaked audio, we stepped back to avoid the appearance of partisanship or manipulation. Still, the matter demands attention, and resolution, not on political lines, but on principle and national interest.

🧩 III. DIFFERING NARRATIVES
👨‍👩‍👧‍👦 1. The Grieving Family’s Concerns

  • The family insists that the late President did not want the current Head of State to attend his funeral, a wish they believe must be honored.
  • There are circulating suspicion, however unverified, that the former President may have been poisoned or mistreated, and concerns have been raised (again, unproven) about possible ritual motives.
  • The family believes that the denial of permission to travel for medical attention may have contributed to his untimely death.

🏛️ 2. The Government’s Position

  • The government sees the family’s demands, particularly excluding the President from the funeral, as unreasonable and driven by political emotion.
  • It believes President Hichilema has made significant efforts to extend an olive branch and uphold the dignity of the office.
  • Officials have argued that the Patriotic Front (PF) is politicizing the funeral to gain public sympathy and stir division.
  • The government also points to protocol and legal precedent, which typically place state funerals under government authority.

⚠️ IV. THE REAL STAKES
Every well-meaning Zambian wants former President Lungu to be buried in his home country, with dignity and honor. But it’s important to recognize one simple truth: the government holds the decisive cards. It controls the protocols, resources, and political tone that will shape the outcome. The way this is handled will be remembered for decades.

Is the family being unreasonable? To some extent, yes, but not entirely. In Zambia, once allegations of superstition or foul play enter public discourse, they are extremely difficult to dislodge. No amount of explanation or assurance will easily change public or private sentiment. This emotional immovability makes it more feasible for the government, not the family, to make meaningful concessions for the sake of peace.

⚖️ V. A LEGAL ROUTE: A NATIONAL DEFEAT
Should the matter be resolved in the courts, particularly abroad, no one will win:

  • If the ruling favors the family, President Lungu may be buried outside Zambia, depriving the nation of its chance to give him a dignified farewell.
  • If the ruling favors the government, the family and political allies may boycott the funeral entirely, robbing it of the human solidarity it requires.

Either outcome reflects a national failure.

🛤️ VI. PATH TO RESOLUTION: WHAT CAN BE DONE
To break this deadlock, Zambia must prioritize dignity, compassion, and practicality. Two viable options exist:

  1. Presidential Delegation Instead Of Attendance
    The President can respect the family’s request by sending a high-level representative, such as the Vice President or Cabinet Minister, to attend on behalf of the government. This frames the President’s absence not as a sign of weakness, but of compassion and humility. It elevates national unity above personal or political rivalries.
  2. Downgrade To A Private Funeral
    Alternatively, the funeral can be reclassified from a State Funeral to a private, family-led ceremony. This allows the burial to proceed without tension or protocol clashes. The government can still offer logistical and security support as a sign of goodwill.

🕯️ VII. FINAL REFLECTIONS
It’s worth noting that South African law strongly favors family rights over the deceased, and Zambia risks losing the legal battle should it proceed there. In that scenario, history will judge us all harshly, not for choosing a side, but for failing to find common ground.

For now, all parties, especially government leaders, must commit to quiet diplomacy. No inflammatory statements, no political games, and no reckless speculation until this solemn chapter is concluded.

This is not just about Edgar Chagwa Lungu. It is about who we are as a nation. Let us act not out of pride, fear, or vengeance, but with dignity, restraint, and love for our country. 🇿🇲

Anyways, the struggle continues.
David Chishimba
Wounded Buffalo.
Revolutionary.

8 COMMENTS

  1. “..the government holds the decisive cards….and controls the political [UPND] tone…”. I am afraid this throws the spanner in the works! You actually mean something else: inequality of arms ? or survival of the fittest?

    Please think outside the box! Burial in a foreign land does not exclude a translation of the mortal remains to Zambia at a future date under a different regime.
    The relevant formalities will surely be followed at this future appropriate time.
    Your alternative solutions are the obvious. The government should have considered them as a matter common sense. Instead they jumped the wrong way !!!

  2. You left out the issue of whether the sitting President made a phone call to the former First Lady to commiserate with her on the loss of her husband and former President upon learning of his demise. If he did not, that may not have helped initiate the process of healing we all so much desire. For a former President who had to literally sneak out of the country for treatment, I doubt the office of the sitting President could have had the phone number of the former first Lady. Despite all the bad blood between the former President and the current, an attempt should have been made by the latter to enable the former President to seek the speacialist treatment he so much needed in good time. That could have helped normalize relations between the two and would have made Mr. Hichilema come out as the ‘bigger man.’ He would not even have had the difficulty of reaching out to the former First Lady in the moments following the death of the former President. For, he could probably have been immediately informed about the passing on of the former President by the Lungu family. President HH managed to become President against all odds. He was able to achieve what he had striven for for many years. His Presidency only stood to gain if he had endeavoured to normalize relations with the former President by allowing him to seek treatment abroad. He lost out humanly speaking and politically when he failed to do that. This is the source of all the tension surrounding the funeral of the former President. Taking the family of the former President to court in a foreign country in order to wrestle his mortal remains from it has only managed to worsen the situation and made the current President lose public support in the matter. This will not help the country heal especially if the mortal remains of the former President are put to rest in South Africa. It will polarize and divide the country further, especially if the UPND does not let go of the PF by stopping to interfere in their internal affairs. The continued mistreatment of the PF by the UPND will serve as a constant reminder of the mistreatment of the former President which the PF can use to whip up sentiments of the people against the UPND. Mind you ECL was no ordinary mortal. He was a Presient who wielded enormous influence.

    • Good comment, and also the first lady formally or otherwise should have contacted physically the former first lady as a women, sit down and talk the women way. Mama Lungu would have a different stand. I mean we are Africans gents.

  3. HH represents national unity, not personal opinion. Any funeral of a former Republican President, including Edgar Chagwa Lungu, is a State function, not a private family affair. That being the case, access and protocol at such an event are guided by State procedures, not by personal feelings or bitterness from any widow or relative or from you as a cadre.
    Zambia is a Republic governed by the rule of law, not by whims of emotion or political grudges and hatred.To Insinuate that Esther Lungu , in her capacity as a widow, has the legal or moral right to chase awa a sitting President from a State funeral is not only unconstitutional but undermines national decency and the dignity of public office. Zambia needs healing, not provocation from people who are seeking personal glory. We need unity,National unity should never be compromised by narrow political interests or misinformation.This is not about who did what in the past but to respect the Former President and give him a decent burial.He was the president for 20 million people not only few cadres and pf sympathisers. His people want to salute him. Never undermine the head of State.He should be the first man to attend this funeral.Otherwise without HH there is no state funeral.His office should not be undermined by few selfish people like you the author .Will keep on posting same words

  4. This article appeared on first glance a well thought out piece but in the end it was and only had one conclusion – HH should step aside! That is rude devoid of acknowledging who is the head of state. The sooner all of you who are on the other side realize that this is not about HH but Zambia the better. For all we know, HH himself may not even like being there, owing to his mistreatment he suffered but he is compelled by law to officiate. That is what it means to live in a country of laws! There is no where in the law where this funeral can be downgraded to a private funeral. ECL was a head of state, chewing tax payers money and must be buried as a former head of state in Zambia- period!
    How do you know the courts there favour family? Which precedent do o you have? Please don’t put half truths to support own agenda. This is a sensitive issue

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here