We are tired of tribal talk, UCZ Bishop tells Lungu

A senior clergyman from the United Church of Zambia has advised former President Edgar Lungu and his associates to refrain from engaging in tribal rhetoric as they strive for a political return to power.

Bishop Lordwell Siame’s caution comes in the wake of a growing trend by Lungu and those associated with him to use tribal talk as a campaign strategy against their opponents.

After noticing that Lungu, Raphael Nakachinda and Given Lubinda were part of the congregation that attended the commissioning reception service of Deaconess Phaides Mukasa at the UCZ Lusaka Presbytery, Kafue Consistory, Bishop Siame decided to dish out some political advice.

The Bishop’s message attracted cheers and claps from the congregation as Lungu and group also clapped reluctantly.

The clergyman pointed out that a true leader must have a heart for all Zambians and the goal must always be transformational.

“To you who have come as politicians and Christians. The message that I will tell you as your bishop also is that when you go out there know that what you are doing is for God. So wherever you are, never look at your differences look at what is bringing you together. And above all have a heart for Zambians, have a heart for the people.”

“Make sure that your goal should be transformational and your goal should not be any other thing, I pray that the Lord may go with you and may his light shine upon you. Preach peace, preach love,” preached Bishop Siame.

The Bishop further warned that should the former President find a UCZ member engaging in tribal talk, the member should undergo disciplinary action.

“Please avoid tribal talk, we are tired, avoid tribal talk, we are all one in Christ here in the UCZ. The lesson that we have taught you as you are going is that, one in Christ.”

“Ba President if you find a UCZ tribalist, bring him, we have our own systems, we know what to do here with people who promote such in our catechism, we promote unity, we promote love, co-existence and we preach things that bring people together,” he said.

By Catherine Pule

Kalemba, November 13, 2024

TASILA AND ESTHER LUNGU’S  APPLICATION TO APPEAL AGAINST GRABBING OF THEIR PROPERTIES  DISMISSED  BY THE COURTS OF LAW IN LUSAKA
——————————-

ECONOMIC and Financial Crimes Court (EFCC) has dismissed Tasila and Esther Lungu’s applications for permission to appeal against the court’s recent judgement ordering forfeiture of their properties.

Tasilu Lungu asked for leave to appeal against EFCC’s decision to order forfeiture to the State of her Sinda farm worth K8.8million.

On the other hand, former First Lady Esther Lungu wanted permission to appeal against the courts decision to order forfeiture of her flats valued at K66million to the State.

In both cases, EFCC has refused to allow Tasila and her mother to appeal against the courts decision to order forfeiture of their asseets.

In the case of Tasila, who is currently abroad on maternity leave, there judges refused to allow her to appeal because her application because it lacks merit as she had failed to advance persuasive grounds to justify allowing her permission to appeal against the court’s judgement.

“We find that the interested party [Ms Lungu] has not advanced compelling grounds or special circumstances to warrant this court to exercise its discretion to grant leave to appeal to the Court of Appeal.

“Leave to appeal is therefore denied,” the ruling rendered on Friday reads.

In a September 17, 2024 judgement, EFCC allowed the forfeiture of Ms Lungu’s farm F/2278 in Sinda, Eastern Province, to the State because it was tainted.

The court ruled that Director of Public Prosecutions had established, on a balance of probabilities, that the property was acquired through illicit means.

Ms Lungu, who is former President Edgar Lungu’s daughter, was also condemned to pay costs.

Dissatisfied with the judgement, Ms Lungu filed an application for leave (permission) to appeal against the verdict before the Court of Appeal.

Through her lawyers, Ms Lungu, who has been out of the country of on maternity leave, urged the court to grant her leave to appeal because her grounds of appeal have serious likelihood of success.

However, Judge Susan Wanjelani, on behalf of other judges, ruled that perusal of Ms Lungu’s intended grounds of appeal reveals that the appeal has no prospects of success.

“Aside from the above, we are also aware that counsel for the interested party urged us to allow the application for leave to appeal because the appeal raises a point of law of public importance.

“…for a point of law to be of public importance, it must have a public or general character rather than one that merely affects the private rights or interest of the parties to a particular dispute,” Judge Susan Wanjela said.

“It is our considered view that though matters to do with non-conviction forfeiture are novel, the said matters do not fall in the realm of public importance because they merely affect private rights”.

On the part of the former first lady, another panel of judges ruled that Mrs Lungu failed to advance any compelling reasons to warrant granting her leave to appeal against the judgement.

Judge Pixie Yangailo said that Mrs Lungu’s grounds of appeal also does not have any prospects of succeeding.

Mrs Lungu lawyers plan to appeal against the refusal to allow them to appeal.

CONMAN OBTAINS NRC IN NAME OF ZAMBIA ARMY COMMANDER

ARREST OF SUSPECTS INVOLVED IN A FRAUDULENT SCHEME

The Zambia Police Service, in collaboration with the Zambia Army Military Police, wishes to inform the public of the arrest of two suspects, Mr. Wiliki Dube aged 28 and Mr. Lloyd Phiri aged 27, who have been involved in a fraudulent scheme targeting unsuspecting citizens.

The two suspects were apprehended following a joint operation and have since been charged with multiple offenses related to forgery, uttering false documents, and giving false information to a public officer. Below is a summary of the charges against them:

1. Forgery: Mr. Wiliki Dube forged an affidavit falsely identifying himself as Geoffrey Chongo Zyeele.
2. Uttering a False Document: Mr. Wiliki Dube presented the forged affidavit at the National Registration Office, purporting to be Geoffrey Chongo Zyeele.
3. Uttering a False Document: Mr. Wiliki Dube used the affidavit at the National Registration Office to falsely claim that his father’s name is Luckson Choongo Zyeele.
4. Uttering a False Document: Mr. Wiliki Dube used the affidavit at the National Registration Office to falsely claim that his mother’s name is Diana Tembo.
5. Uttering a False Document: Mr. Wiliki Dube used the affidavit at the National Registration Office to falsely claim that his father’s name is Luckson Chongo Zyeele.
6. False Swearing – Mr. Wiliki Dube did swear falsely or made a false affirmation or declaration before a person authorized to administer an oath or declaration upon a matter of public concern under such circumstances in judicial proceedings. 

In addition, Mr. Wiliki Dube and Mr. Lloyd Phiri have been jointly charged with Giving False Information to a Public Officer: Mr. Lloyd Phiri for signing an affidavit falsely indicating that he is the father of Wiliki Dube while Mr. Wiliki Dube provided false information to a public officer, claiming his name is Geoffrey Chongo Zyeele.

Using this fraudulent identity, he proceeded to open an Airtel Money account under the same name with the intent to deceive.

Mr. Lloyd Phiri, aged 27, a former civilian employee of the Zambia Army, is accused of facilitating the acquisition of the fraudulent NRC for Mr. Dube, assisting in the scheme that led to significant public deception.

Both suspects are accused of using this fraudulent identity to solicit money from members of the public under the pretense of aiding recruitment into the Zambia Army. We would like to reiterate that the Zambia Army does not demand payments from prospective recruits and is not currently conducting any recruitment exercise.

The Zambia Police Service remains committed to safeguarding the public from fraudulent activities and ensuring that individuals who attempt to defraud the citizenry are held accountable. We urge members of the public to remain vigilant and report any suspicious activities to the Police.

Rae Hamoonga
POLICE PUBLIC RELATIONS OFFICER

Hakainde Hichilema’s PR in Comatose -Laura Miti, My Response

Amb. Emmanuel Mwamba wrote;

Civil Society leader and President Hakainde Hichilema’s apologist, Laura Miti says the whole government media machinery is in a a deep coma and is constantly defeated by Emmanuel Mwamba’s “lies and spin.”

Her view is right but both her diagnosis and prognosis are equally flawed.

Now, here is why Hichilema’s public image remains in tatters to the extent that if Zambia held a general election today, he and most of his MPs will likely lose to any candidate the Opposition will front.

Hichilema’s own lies and broken promises that are easy to show, forms part of his biggest image crisis.

We say: “social-media does NOT forget.”

So it’s easy to replay Hichilema’s own past videos, tweets and Facebook postings to show that he has lied or continues to break his own campaign promises.

Hichilema found an economy struggling, a high cost of living, foreign debt burden issues that were sitting on a bed of legacy issues such as unemployment, lack of economic opportunities, disease burden, a volatile exchange rate, corruption, abuse of the law and human rights abuses.

Unfortunately, Hichilema has driven all these indices to a worse level than we have ever witnessed in the last 60 years.

This crisis is HH’s own making. He won’t even consider an apology against his own lies and sadly won’t accept that things are worse. Like Laura, he thinks its a mere image or PR crisis.

O er three years in office now, he has encouraged his officials and praise singers to sing that it’s the Patriotic Front that is to blame for the current crises, even when these assertions are mostly false and  just annoy citizens further!

Let’s look at President Hakainde Hichilema’s various media teams.

He has Clayson Hamasaka, Frederick Misebezi and Brian Mwiinga at State House.

He recently recruited veteran journalist and lawyer, Whitney Mulobela to help with media strategy.

He has Chief Government Spokesperson, Cornelius Mweetwa and his wayward, zealous and toxic Permanent Secretary, Thabo Kawana.

He has those manning his foreign media buy and apearances such as Brenthurst Foundation.

He has Mark Simuuwe speaking and totles himself as a ” UPND consultant”! Which consultant speaks for an organisation he has been hired to? Does Simuuwe know what the word “Consultant” mean?

He has Jaquiline Chishimba who does government and agency related PR at a commercial fee.

He has assembled radio callers, social-media bloggers and the UPND is currently hosting various party media centres.

He has Frank Bwalya, Cosmas Chileshe and Patrick Samwimbila he recently poached from the Patriotic Front.

He has State House Special Assistant for Investments, Jito Kayumba, who promotes quality videos and drone shots like that of weddings, over emphasis on credible or persuasive content.

He had Times of Zambia, Zambia Daily Mail, ZANIS and ZNBC that urgently need a reboot to move away from their archaic methods and legacy tendencies.

He has various Ministries, Departments and Agencies that have their own  fully fledged PR units.

Hichilema also has a media friendly private media, some bought, some invested-in, some loyal, and others intimidated.

So despite his wide media infrastructure , why is Hichilema’s media in comatose? that “it’s being defeated by Emmanuel Mwamba” according to Laura Miti?

First of all his team of advisors believe in a hard and brutal approach, a mistaken belief that this will bring to order erring Opposition, vocal critics or a wayward social-media platform.

Instead of applying media skills to every contentious issue and concentrating on setting the agenda or merely doing their job, his media teams believe in using the Police, issues unwarranted threatens, beat, detain and arrested us.

Everyone throws their weight against us from ZANIS reporter Kalani Muchima who constantly calls for our arrest to UPND media page owners such as my young brother Roy Makayi demanding an equal platform debate.

Sadly Hichilema, verily, believes in Koswe and affiliated rogue media outlets, a type of media that churns out defamatory and annoying insults against his perceived political opponents, probably guerilla journalism that could served and saved him better in Opposition but totally irrelevant and a PR nightmare for a ruling Party determined to win hearts and minds of stakeholders and the people.

His Permanent Secretary of Information and Media, Thabo Kawana falsely postures himself as Chief Government Spokesperson thereby constantly undermining the role of his Minister.
Because he lacks the authority, Kawana creates a nagging perception, especially, on hot or sensitive matters, that his statements may be overruled by the Minister.

He creates an unmistakable impression of unbriddled and naked ambitions, that he must be appointed as Minister and Chief Government Spokesperson.

It is worse at State House, the seat of all power. State House has no voice or face of Spokesperson.

Clayson Hamasaka is expected to play this role “alilubila mubowa”! However we only see Hamasaka at work through dry statements, usually poorly written, we see more of his cattle and his fish projects than we see him perform his role as State House Spokesperson.

Because of thsi vacuum at State House and Ministry of Information, others have tried to step up to fill the vacuum such as Thabo Kawana and Mark Simuuwe.

But from their work, its easy to note that both have no media training, cannot set the national agenda and are constantly reactive.

There is a clear disconnect in communication of government policies and programs. Its the case of the left hand NOT knowing what the right hand is doing.

They think by arresting us, scandalising us or destroying us, or labeling us propagandist, that it will take away the failed project that President Hakainde Hichilema is quickly panning out to be.

You cannot spin against hunger.

You cannot spin yourself out of a volatile exchange rate market.

You cannot hide corruption.

You cannot hide scandals.

You cannot hide unemployment, cost of living crisis and disease outbreaks!

You cannot spin yourself out of of an economic crisis.

My simple advice to President Hichilema is that before he considers putting up a new media team, he should work and deliver!Chapwa!

Working hard without any meaningful results requires an introspection.

There is no better story, no better PR than the story of success and results..failure attracts blame games while success attracts results and many fathers.

LAURA MITI WROTE:

If the President resolutely refuses to put together a PR team, that can easily show the stories that Emmanuel Mwamba expertly (grant that to him) puts together, to be mostly lies or spin, then he cannot be excused for unpresidentially doing what should be left to his communication team.

The whole government being defeated in the PR game because the Kateks refuses to do the right, if difficult, thing. Refuses to reassign, not even fire, those who have failed in a fundamental task.

The problem is not social media, Sir! It’s your comatose communication function.

Laura Miti Must understand that PR Can’t Fix Everything: The Government Must Focus on Real Solutions

By Thandiwe Ketis Ngoma

In her recent Facebook post, Laura Miti raised concerns about the UPND government’s public relations (PR) efforts, accusing them of failing to effectively counter the “misinformation” being spread by Ambassador Emmanuel Mwamba, the PF Publicity and Information Secretary. She further suggests that the government is losing the PR battle due to the unwillingness of the “Kateks”—a term presumably referring to the president—to take decisive action, such as reassigning or even dismissing those responsible for what she perceives as a communication failure.

While it’s true that a well-organized PR team is essential for shaping public perception and managing misinformation, there are clear limitations to what PR alone can accomplish when the facts are undeniable and right in front of the public. Ambassador Mwamba may be adept at crafting narratives, but it is critical to acknowledge that these narratives are not lies. Instead, they reflect the very real issues and challenges facing the government. The issues highlighted by Ambassador Mwamba are not hypothetical or invented; they are grounded in the lived experiences of citizens and the ongoing policies of the government. These are matters of public record, visible to anyone paying attention, and the transparency of these issues makes it almost impossible to dispute the accuracy of the claims.

In this context, the role of PR becomes constrained. While public relations efforts are designed to correct misconceptions, promote achievements, and shape public understanding, they cannot mask the more significant and systemic challenges that people face. No amount of slick media messaging can change the fact that citizens are dealing with economic hardship, inadequate public services, and governance failures on a daily basis. The government’s communications team can attempt to counteract these narratives, but they cannot rewrite the reality of people’s lives.

Focusing only on managing the narrative without addressing the core issues will only deepen public skepticism and further erode trust in the government’s ability to lead. The public is no longer looking for well-crafted speeches or carefully controlled media appearances; they are looking for real, substantive change. They want improvements in the economy, better public services, and a government that can demonstrate accountability. The real measure of effective governance is not found in polished press releases or talking points but in tangible actions that directly improve people’s lives.

Therefore, rather than investing significant resources in fighting narratives, the government must prioritize delivering real, measurable improvements. Whether in the economy, healthcare, education, or infrastructure, progress is the most powerful PR. When the government addresses the pressing needs of the population and achieves meaningful results, these will naturally speak louder than any message crafted by a communications team. The true strength of a government’s public relations lies not in its spin, but in its ability to create visible, positive change.

It is undeniable that a strong communications team can amplify a government’s successes, but the actions themselves—tangible, impactful changes—are what will ultimately define public perception. PR is a tool, not a substitute for leadership. The government can no longer afford to spend its energy on damage control or media spin. To restore public trust, it must focus on delivering solutions, not just talking about them. Only then will the PR challenges fade, as the people will have real results to validate the government’s narrative.

In the final analysis, the true measure of a government’s success will not be found in its ability to manage media narratives but in its ability to confront and solve the real challenges facing its citizens. For a government serious about restoring confidence in its leadership, the priority must be action over words, substance over spin. Achieving tangible, meaningful progress will not only address the concerns of the public, but it will also render PR countermeasures unnecessary. Actions speak louder than words, and no amount of PR can compensate for a lack of real, effective governance. The time for spin is over; now is the time for action.

MINING GIANT ANGLO BACK TO ZAMBIA, MEET HICHILEMA

…They Left In 2001 After MMD Stole Mazoka’s Election

Africa’s mining giant Anglo American Corporation is back to Zambia after having left the country in 2001.

The mine giant withdrew from Zambia after UPND president Anderson Mazoka a former Anglo CEO was robbed of his victory in 2001 by Frederick Chiluba and MMD.

Following the winning of the UPND in 2021 under another business friendly leader Hakainde Hichilema Anglo American Corporation has announced it’s return to the number two copper producing country.

They have since held a meeting with President Hakainde Hichilema. The meeting was held on Monday this week, 11th November 2024 at State House.

The Zambian President who campaigned on bringing in more foreign investments in order to create jobs targets 3 million tonnes of copper production.

This is what President Hichilema wrote after this milestone engagement with the Ango delegation led by its CEO:

HE MET ANGLO-AMERICA!

This afternoon, we hosted a delegation from Anglo American Corporation, led by the company’s Chief Executive Officer, Duncan Wanblad, who are in the country.

We are glad to note the renewed interest by Anglo American Corporation, to invest in our mining sector, after close of 20 years of their exit. The 3 million tons annual copper production target we have set for ourselves will require partnerships with reputable mining companies like Anglo American corporation.

Our government remains committed to facilitate an investment environment in the mining sector that will benefit our people and help to grow the economy. To achieve the kind of win – win investment environment, continuous dialogue on the policy and legal frameworks for the sector, remains key.
We are working closely with the Chamber of Mines to ensure we have the right mining investment environment, supported by the right policy and legal frameworks for the benefit of our people.

Hakainde Hichilema,
President of the Republic of Zambia.

HE MET ANGLO-AMERICA!

This afternoon, we hosted a delegation from Anglo American Corporation, led by the company’s Chief Executive Officer, Duncan Wanblad, who are in the country.

We are glad to note the renewed interest by Anglo American Corporation, to invest in our mining sector, after close of 20 years of their exit. The 3 million tons annual copper production target we have set for ourselves will require partnerships with reputable mining companies like Anglo American corporation.

Our government remains committed to facilitate an investment environment in the mining sector that will benefit our people and help to grow the economy. To achieve the kind of win – win investment environment, continuous dialogue on the policy and legal frameworks for the sector, remains key.
We are working closely with the Chamber of Mines to ensure we have the right mining investment environment, supported by the right policy and legal frameworks for the benefit of our people.

Hakainde Hichilema,
President of the Republic of Zambia.

THE POTENTIAL COST OF HH’S HEGEMONIC PRESIDENCY FOR ZAMBIA IS A CONCERN

By Sensio Banda, former Kasenengwa MP

Ever since gaining independence, Zambia has witnessed the presence of a “hegemonic presidency” in its political landscape.

The presidency has wielded great authority, shaping the course of Zambian politics from the days of UNIP’s founding of the republic to the recent administration of the UPND. Through its control over finances and broad appointment powers, various regimes have exercised significant influence through the hegemonic presidency, with few exceptions for presidents who passed away while in office.

It is important to emphasize that the primary objective of any “hegemonic presidency” is to maintain power at any cost, often neglecting the best interests of the nation. As a result, it can be concluded that all past administrations have displayed elements of a “hegemonic presidency”.

It is fair to say that, to a certain extent, past administrations discerned the value of hearing the voices of the people and honoring their will.

Dr. Kenneth B. Kaunda, for example, demonstrated this by accepting the amendment of the constitution to allow for multiparty democracy and early elections and ultimately accepting defeat in the 1991 general election.

Dr. Frederick T.J. Chiluba also respected the people’s will by foregoing a third-term bid. Rupiah B. Banda followed suit in 2011, graciously accepting the outcome of the general election after three years of service.

In 2021, Dr. Edgar C. Lungu showed his commitment to democracy by conceding to the people’s will regarding Constitutional Bill 10 and accepting defeat in the general election.

Is Dr. HH’s “hegemonic presidency” truly discerning its limits, the will of the people, and the country’s best interests? While past administrations have employed similar strategies to retain power, Dr. HH’s regime stands out for its excessive exertion of authority, extreme dominance over the legislative and judicial branches, and dismantling of opposition parties. The seizing of law-making abilities, widespread use of presidential decrees, and complete command over patronage and government fund, all indicate the unchecked power.

The above has resulted in a reduction of checks and balances that are essential for maintaining accountability. Dr. HH’s concentration of power has led to the erosion of the authority of key public institutions, creating a “zero-sum framework” where presidential powers have increased at the expense of the legislative and judicial branches.

If President Dr. HH continues on the path of a “hegemonic presidency,” it is important for him to consider the impact this will have on Zambia once he leaves office. Does he realize the harm being done to our government branches, public institutions, democratic freedoms, and national unity? What kind of legacy does he want to leave behind for future generations?

The President must reflect on the consequences of his governing style and work towards a more balanced distribution of power to protect our democratic young democracy . Let us hope that he takes this opportunity to rethink his approach and make positive changes for the betterment of our nation.

The Struggle Continues.

15% WITHHOLDING TAX ON REMITTENCES ABOVE $2,000

I have tried to consult a number of experts on this tax measure announced in the 2025 budget, which takes effect in January 2025. Most of them seem confused about what it exactly means. The questions paused are twofold:

1. Is this a revenue mobilisation measure?
2. ⁠Is it to curb illicit flows out of the country due to the FIC report of $3 billion exposed remittences?

Firstly, it is unclear whether this is a blanket tax on all remittances leaving the country, regardless, or is it for selected transaction types.

Addressing 1, above, we can discount that it’s not a revenue mobilisation measure because we understand that it’s refundable or  exempted if you have a tax clearance certificate.

Addressing 2 is a complex issue. Why would you introduce a tax to curb illicit transactions because that’s a crime? FIC has exact details of which transactions they are reporting and who is responsible? So why not just prosecute the perpetrators of such transactions instead of inconveniencing innocent citizens?

If we turn this around, are we then saying that illicit transactions will be permitted as long as you pay 15% tax? Would people involved in money laundering bother to pay 15% tax to cleanse their illegitimate money? The answer is that it’s music to their ears.

So the big question is, what is the rationale behind this policy measure?

Let’s explore this further, what will be defined as remittences above $2,000?

If I travel outside the country and use my Kwacha debit or credit card, will my expenses paid outside Zambia be deemed as remittences? I say so because the settlement for my foreign expenses paid using my Kwacha card will have to be settled in $ by my Zambian bank, which issued the card.

If I pay college fees for my son or daughter overseas, then do I have to pay 15% tax?

What if I purchase goods using online platforms using my Kwacha debit or credit card exceeding $2,000? Will that be deemed as remittences, or is it only direct bank to bank transfers that will be deemed as remittences? Currently, BoZ sets $5,000 for Bureaux and $10,000 for commercial banks as daily limits for purchasing dollars. Note that these are daily limits.

Now, we are introducing another limit at another level. Why not synchronise these limits to avert creating confusion.

Is this policy not going to create an informal international payment system? I say so because I can withdraw $10,000 from a commercial bank and send offshore using individuals? Are we aware that the biggest money transmission channel for our cross-border transactions is truck and bus drivers?

Another expert commented that could the recent sharp rise of the Kwacha rate at K27.56 per $ be as a result of this policy announcement? Could those with excess Kwacha balances be externalising money now to avoid this tax, which comes into effect in January 2025, thereby putting pressure on the dollar demand side?

All in all can the MoF provide a comprehensive guidance on how this tax measure will work rather than creating anxiety and speculation in the market.

Fred M’membe

LUNGU IS MOVED BY THE WIND, HE CAN’T BE JUMPING FROM POINT A to B IN ALLIANCES – CHABINGA

PATRIOTIC Front (PF) acting president, Robert Chabinga says small political alliances are the ones that are supposed to be following former president, Edgar Lungu to gain momentum, unlike him being the one jumping in between insignificant alliances.

Chabinga said the actions of the former Head of State are only proving that he is being moved by the wind and has no purpose or direction of his own.

The leader of opposition said this when he held a press briefing in Lusaka on Sunday where in his capacity as acting PF president announced the expulsion of the former head of state, Given Lubinda and Miles Sampa among others from the party.

“It is even ironic that he is running around joining small political parties where as it should be the other way out. He is the one who is moving from point A to point B why should he be the one seeking alliances? It seems he is blown by wind.”

“Going from being the largest party to jumping between insignificant alliances. The best that he could have done, was to be the first person to unite us in the party,” Chabinga said.

Chabinga said most alliances are driven by hurt, bitterness and lack of foresight adding that the ‘New PF’  is open to alliances, but that it will engage with progressive individuals at an appropriate time as for now, it needs to put its house in order.

“The only problem is that my big man, Mr Lungu thinks he is the only one who can lead but the truth is, there are capable individuals like myself who can take leadership and others. But the selfishness of Lungu prevents such things from taking place,” Chabinga said.

He said Lungu betrayed the party members after he told them they could go for a convention and made them pay sums of money, knowing very well that he also desired to remain party leader.

“And later on he changed his mind that Alebwekelapo. That is not the situation, so my issue is that they should simply register a cooperative with President Lungu as the chairperson and apply for the Constituency Development Fund (CDF) and get funding so that they stop moving up and down,” Chabinga advised.

Chabinga further advised Lunguv onbhis associates, stating that the kind of people that surround him, only flock to his compound to beg for his money.

“Like the way people flock the residence of the former President,  I pity my president, and I advised him time and again that the people that are surrounding him are just there to eat, nothing else. They are [for] politics of the belly,” said Chabinga.

Kalemba

Inside the Ministry of Health Scandal: The Power and Influence of a Cartel in Zambian Health Affairs

By Justine Mooya Samu Lya Moomba
11th November 2024

In a shocking revelation, disturbing details have emerged about a powerful cartel allegedly operating within Zambia’s Ministry of Health, with deep-rooted influence and control extending into the Zambia Medicines and Medical Supplies Agency (ZAMMSA).

The cartel, comprising influential figures tied to high-profile government contracts, is said to operate with the blessings of key officials and to control procurement and supply decisions to favor certain companies and individuals.
The unfolding scandal centers around two prominent figures in the alleged cartel: Mr. Malindi, owner of the medical supply company Tachmed, and Kuso Kamwambi, a member of the Presidential Delivery Unit (PDU).

This duo, with close ties to key decision-makers within the Ministry of Health, has reportedly exercised their influence to control procurement deals, including the hiring and firing of key personnel.

Sources indicate that Mr. Malindi, who often claims to be the cousin of the President, has repeatedly used this position to pressure government officials, including Dr. Kennedy Lishimpi, Permanent Secretary (PS) of Technical Services, to comply with the cartel’s demands.

This partnership allegedly wields significant power, with Ms. Kamwambi at State House reportedly aiding Mr. Malindi to shape policy decisions and oust those who resist their influence. Together, these two form the operational backbone of the cartel within the health sector.

At the center of the controversy is Mr. Justine Mulimo, Acting Director of Procurement at ZAMMSA, who has allegedly faced significant pressure from Mr. Malindi to comply with cartel-led procurement preferences. Mr. Malindi, unsatisfied with Mulimo’s diligence and his refusal to approve certain questionable procurement contracts, has reportedly demanded that Dr. Lishimpi remove him from his position.

A meeting was reportedly held over the weekend, where it was decided that Mulimo would be fired on Monday, 11th November 2024. Sources suggest that Mr. Jacob Masatunya from the Eastern Province procurement department is slated to replace Mulimo, marking yet another alleged move by the cartel to consolidate their control within ZAMMSA.

A Disturbing Pattern of Manipulation and Influence,The recent decision to fire the ZAMMSA Director-General, which was made public by the Minister of Health, Hon. Dr. Elijah Muchima, has raised further questions.

According to insiders, this decision may have been influenced by the same cartel, aiming to install a more compliant individual who would facilitate the cartel’s procurement agenda. Meanwhile, Minister Muchima has faced criticism for allegedly aligning with the cartel, as he reportedly prioritized their interests over the concerns of other ZAMMSA stakeholders and the public.

In a peculiar twist, the Minister reportedly traveled to Ethiopia over the weekend with the wife of Mr. Malindi, which sources claim was intended to strengthen his ties with the cartel. This has raised eyebrows within government circles, as it is seen as compromising the integrity of the Ministry’s decision-making.

The ZAMMSA agency, tasked with ensuring the reliable distribution of medical supplies, has faced ongoing disruptions since the cartel allegedly began interfering in its operations. Past officials who resisted the cartel’s influence, such as former Director Billy Mweetwa, were reportedly sidelined or removed to pave the way for more malleable leaders. Similarly, Commissioner Nyasulu, who succeeded Mweetwa and maintained an independent stance, also found himself at odds with the cartel’s agenda.

The infamous Egyptian Gold Scandal, involving the questionable handling of government-to-government procurement, highlights the extent to which cartel influence has plagued the Ministry of Health. Those who have attempted to implement transparent processes have reportedly faced retaliation from the cartel, whose members leverage their connections to protect and expand their interests.

International donors have also expressed concern over the state of affairs at ZAMMSA, raising questions about the preparedness of the agency to prevent the mismanagement that resulted in a controversial case involving 61 containers of medical supplies. Despite assurances from interim ZAMMSA leadership that the agency’s operations were improving, recent statements by Minister Muchima appear to have undermined this message, leading to the dismissal of the current Director-General.

The alleged involvement of Tachmed in securing contracts for medical supplies, alongside Aasee Pharmaceuticals, raises further questions about whether the procurement process has been compromised. Aasee Pharmaceuticals recently supplied essential ambulances under the Constituency Development Fund (CDF), and now seeks to monopolize additional supply contracts.

When interim ZAMMSA Director Aulituli opposed sole-sourcing of these contracts, he, too, faced opposition from cartel members.

The allegations against Mr. Malindi, Ms. Kamwambi, and others in the cartel paint a troubling picture of an institution under siege, manipulated by individuals who prioritize personal profit over public service. This manipulation risks undermining the very mandate of ZAMMSA, which has yet to fully recover from the string of disruptions and political interference.

Zambia’s Ministry of Health may require extensive reforms to restore accountability and transparency to its operations. The Pharmaceutical Society of Zambia and pharmacy unions have expressed a strong desire for change, calling for an investigation into the influence wielded by the cartel and a review of procurement practices at ZAMMSA. They seek to ensure that ZAMMSA fulfills its purpose without undue interference and serves the public as intended.

As the scandal continues to unravel, Zambia stands at a crossroads. Will the Ministry of Health take bold steps to dismantle the cartel and restore integrity to its institutions, or will it allow vested interests to further consolidate their hold on ZAMMSA and its operations? The nation awaits answers, as the actions taken in the coming days will determine whether Zambia’s health sector can regain its footing and serve its people with the transparency and accountability they deserve.

WHAT IS LAURA MITI PAID FOR?

We have observed a consistent series of intense critiques from Laura Miti directed at the State House communications team. Her statements, often laced with an apparent animosity, seem aimed particularly at discrediting Clayson Hamasaka. While Laura Miti may hold personal disdain toward him, her repeated attempts to discredit the team deserve scrutiny.

Like Laura, we may also hold reservations about certain individuals at State House, that’s normal in every Presidency including the White House. However, it’s important to recognize the unique role and structure of the Presidency within the Zambian government.

The Presidency, by design, is not meant to defend itself in direct confrontations or public spats. It would be bathing in its own waters.

*The Role of the Presidential Communications Team*

It is neither the job of the Presidential Communications Team to engage with individuals like Emmanuel Mwamba, Chilufya Tayali, or Sean Tembo, nor to respond to opposition propaganda. Such tasks fall outside their mandate and would only distract from their primary responsibilities. If the team were to focus on addressing every critique, they would find themselves entangled in endless public disputes.

The Zambian government has established a variety of channels and departments specifically tasked with communicating government initiatives and countering misinformation. These include:

The Ministry of Information, through the Minister and Permanent Secretary.

The Director and Spokesperson at Cabinet Office.

Public Relations Officers (PROs) across ministries, government quasi-bodies, councils, and other entities.

Party Spokesperson, Party Media Team, and other designated roles.

Laura Miti should acknowledge that these institutions are equipped and mandated to handle communication of government programs, as well as fact-checking and addressing misinformation. The Presidential Communications Team, on the other hand, is tasked with representing the Presidency itself and should not be expected to directly engage in confrontations with various critics. To demand otherwise reveals a misunderstanding of their role and responsibilities.

*Gaps in Government Communication*

Admittedly, there exists a gap in effectively communicating government programs. This is precisely where the roles of the aforementioned platforms become crucial. The Presidential Communications Team cannot—and should not—be expected to promote every government program or policy. For instance, communication regarding Constituency Development Fund (CDF) implementation should come from council PROs, who are better positioned to share these success stories at the local level. Similarly, misinformation should be addressed by the Chief Government Spokesperson, Party Spokesperson, and Ministry PROs, who each have the remit to clarify matters within their respective areas.

The Presidency should not have to explain issues such as low water levels at Kariba when ZESCO’s spokesperson is available to provide such information. Demanding that the Presidential Communications Team cover every government matter is both unrealistic and counterproductive.

*Questioning Laura Miti’s Role*

It appears that Laura Miti’s personal grievances may be influencing her public criticisms. While we recognize her right to provide checks and balances, we urge her to approach her critiques with realism and fairness. This raises an important question: what is Laura Miti’s role in government? What exactly is she paid to do? Is her focus solely on critiquing the Presidential Communications Team, or does she have broader responsibilities?

In closing, we hope Laura Miti reflects on her approach and considers the structured roles within government communication before casting aspersions on those tasked with upholding the Presidency.

Implementors Analysis Crew

*IMF Reaches Staff-Level Agreement on the Fourth Review of the Extended Credit Facility with Zambia*

November 11, 2024

The Zambian authorities and the IMF team have reached a staff-level agreement on the authorities’ economic policies and reforms to conclude the fourth review of the 38-month Extended Credit Facility (ECF) arrangement.

The lingering effects of the drought have hit Zambia’s economic landscape harder than anticipated, with reduced agricultural output and electricity shortages impacting economic activity widely. Real GDP growth is now forecasted at 1.2 percent for 2024.

https://www.imf.org/en/News/Articles/2024/11/11/pr-24413-zambia-imf-reaches-agreement-on-4th-review-of-ecf

The authorities mobilized emergency relief to the most vulnerable population while maintaining fiscal consolidation to restore debt sustainability. Going forward, mobilizing revenues and stepping up structural and governance reforms will help Zambia unlock growth and safeguard hard-gained progress.

Washington, DC: An International Monetary Fund staff team, led by Mercedes Vera Martin, engaged in discussions with the Zambian authorities in Lusaka during October 2-15, focusing on reforms and policy priorities underpinning the fourth review of the IMF-supported program under the Extended Credit Facility (ECF).

Discussions continued during the IMF/WB Annual Meetings in Washington. This staff-level agreement is subject to IMF Management approval and Executive Board consideration. Upon completion of the review, Zambia will have access to about $185.5 million in financing (SDR 139.9 million).

At the conclusion of the discussions, Ms. Vera Martin issued the following statement:

“We are pleased to announce that the Zambian authorities and the IMF team have reached a staff-level agreement on economic policies and reforms for the fourth review of Zambia’s ECF arrangement.”

“The outlook for 2024 has deteriorated; Real GDP growth is now projected at 1.2 percent, from 2.3 percent projected in June, as extensive electricity shortfalls have impacted economic activity significantly. Contractions in agriculture (20.6 percent y/y) and electricity (9.6 percent y/y) and a deceleration in non-mining non-agriculture activity (from 7.7 percent y/y in 2023H1 to 3.5 percent y/y in 2024H1) amid intensifying power shortages dragged growth to 1.9 percent (y/y) in the first half of 2024. Inflation accelerated to 15.7 percent in October 2024, driven by food prices and past kwacha depreciation, drifting further from the inflation target band (6–8 percent). Subdued imports, increased grants and an anticipated increase in copper exports should shift the current account to a small surplus in 2024.”

“Fiscal performance in 2024 has been marked by constrained domestic financing and spending compression. The end-June primary surplus reached 3.4 percent of GDP, well above the program target. The primary balance (cash basis) in 2024, is projected at a surplus of 0.9 percent of GDP, much stronger than the program deficit target of 0.7 percent. Despite the consolidation, the authorities have upscaled social spending to support the most vulnerable through the drought.”

“The medium-term outlook remains favorable, but with significant downside risks. Growth in 2025 is projected at 6.2 percent (revised from 6.6 percent) as electricity output is not expected to fully recover. This outlook is bolstered by a recovery in agricultural and mining production and the completion of the debt restructuring and is underpinned by prudent policies and ongoing reforms. Inflation is expected to converge to the target band by end-2025, given strong base effects. The external position is projected to strengthen on account of higher exports and FDI, supporting reserve accumulation.”

“The authorities have reiterated their strong commitment to prudent macroeconomic policies and ambitious reforms to sustain economic stability and boost medium-term growth. Discussions revolved around four key pillars. First, the 2025 Budget will preserve social spending while maintaining fiscal consolidation over the program period. The authorities have committed to additional domestic revenues—such as rationalizing tax exemptions, harmonizing the CIT, and indexing excises to inflation—and identify contingent spending measures to sustain fiscal consolidation efforts and support debt sustainability.”

“Second, building buffers against economic and climate-related shocks is paramount to restore and safeguard debt sustainability. Improving tax compliance, broadening the tax base, and enhancing tax policy remain top priorities. Meanwhile, public financial management reforms will help improve the transparency and efficiency of public spending, notably through enhanced cash management and SOEs oversight.

“Third, monetary policy must remain agile to combat inflation while preserving exchange rate flexibility. With a negative real policy rate, looser liquidity conditions, and strong growth in monetary aggregates, the Bank of Zambia should focus on driving inflation toward the target band. Efforts to promote the use of the domestic currency in domestic transactions should be accompanied by market-driven incentives once macroeconomic stability is consolidated, hedging instruments to manage exchange rate risks are available to the private sector, and prudential regulation is in place to help internalize financial risks associated with dollarization. The Bank of Zambia will continue strengthening banking supervision, including by developing an effective deposit insurance scheme and reviewing the financial services framework.

“Finally, faster progress in structural reforms to reduce distortions for the private sector remains key for economic recovery and diversification. This includes enhancing transparency in the energy sector to foster competitive open access to the pipeline and reduce fuel costs for all. Improving the business climate by reducing regulatory distortions will also help create a more even-leveled playfield. Enhanced State-Owned Enterprises’ transparency, along with the implementation of the anti-corruption legislation, would bolster governance and public accountability.”

“The IMF staff team expresses gratitude to the Zambian authorities for their constructive dialogue, warm hospitality, and strong cooperation. A Board meeting is anticipated by mid-December.”

MEDIA RELATIONS
PRESS OFFICER: Wafa Amr

Phone: +1 202 623-7100Email: MEDIA@IMF.org

@IMFSpokesperson

TOO EARLY TO CALL WHO CAN EMERGE WINNER IN 2026

…..BUT A WELL ORGANIZED OPPOSITION CAN CAUSE TROUBLE FOR THE RULING PARTY

As Zambia heads towards 2026 general elections many opinions of the potential outcomes of the general elections are beginning to emerge in many social media forums.

These opinions are based on various sources of information and factors.

THE RULING PARTY

The UPND
administration under the leadership of President Hakainde Hichilema has been in charge of Zambia’s social economic persues after having won the 2021 elections.

The UPND victory in 2021 was viewed as a victory of hope for many people particularly the unemployed youths, low income households, small and medium scale farmers, street vendors among many other demographics of citizens.

President Hakainde was viewed as the modern “messiah” of Zambia.

The citizens were assured – promised that a victory of President Hakainde Hichilema was a victory for the restoration of social economic hope and growth.

At three years of the UPND administration being in charge of Zambia, mixed midterm scorecards for the UPND have emerged with many citizens rating the UPND administration very poorly. People’s hope of economic restoration has not been delivered. The cost of living has skyrocketed to threatening levels of poverty.

Many people are disappointed that President Hakainde Hichilema has not delivered on many of his campaign promises.

DEMOCRATIC SPACE

It has been the concern of many stakeholders that, government has been systematically attempting to completely eliminate the voices of  critics. Recently some Diplomats accredited to, Zambia joined the call to allow citizens and politicall parties to without intimidation or restrictions enjoy their right to organize, assemble and enjoy democratic constitutional  freedoms.

COURT RULINGS

Under the leadership of President Hakainde Hichilema some court rulings have raised eyebrows as well as concerns about the separation of power and independence of the Judiciary in Zambia. Many citizens are of the views that the Judiciary’s autonomy is under serious threats, the independent Judiciary helps in the promotion of as well as nurturing the Growth of democracy in Zambia.

PUBLIC ORDER ACT

Many stakeholders in Zambia’s democracy believe that the UPND administration under the leadership of President Hakainde Hichilema has been abusing the public order Act to limit the freedoms of opposition political parties in Zambia.  While in opposition President Hakainde Hichilema condemned the abuse of the public order Act and promised to do better on that score.

THE OPPOSITION

Given the nature of Zambian politics it is extremely difficult for any   opposition political party  to solely score victory in 2026. A fragmented opposition is an added advantage to the incumbent and his party.

The opposition must craft their on ground messages, social media messages to promote their manifestos, ideologies and policies.

The current prevailing people’s temperament actually favors the opposition, though it does not guarantee them victory without serious hard work.

CIVIL SOCIETY AND MEDIA 

The civil society and media will equally play a critical role in the run up to the 2026 general elections. These entities will act as neutral referees. They have a role to educate and inform citizens without any biases.

Francis Chipili
Business and Political Analyst

The UPND’s Ruthless Political Calculations: A Blueprint for One-Party Rule?

By Thandiwe Ketis Ngoma

In a series of brazen political maneuvers, the United Party for National Development (UPND) government has shifted its support from Miles Sampa—who allegedly played a key role in destabilizing Zambia’s main opposition, the Patriotic Front (PF)—to Chabinga, who appears to be the latest pawn in the UPND’s political game. Sampa, widely believed to have enjoyed state backing, controversially declared himself PF President through a “bogus convention,” an event seen as orchestrated to fracture PF from within. The government-owned media outlet ZNBC even broadcasted this spectacle, signaling its endorsement. However, Sampa’s meteoric rise has now been abruptly halted as the UPND pivots to Chabinga—a new face they are intent on promoting as the legitimate leader of PF.

Chabinga, thrust into the political spotlight, is now receiving similar government backing, with extensive media coverage and other resources, despite flouting a court injunction that bars him from assuming PF’s presidency. This blatant disregard for the rule of law raises urgent and uncomfortable questions: Why is the UPND so obsessed with interfering in PF’s internal affairs? More crucially, what long-term damage will this manipulation inflict on Zambia’s fragile democracy?

From Sampa to Chabinga: A Disturbing and Dangerous Pattern of Political Interference

The UPND’s transition from Sampa to Chabinga is not a spontaneous or opportunistic move; it is part of a carefully calculated strategy. The pattern is unmistakable: first Sampa, now Chabinga—each allegedly benefiting from government support designed to destabilize and undermine PF’s leadership. Despite a clear court injunction barring Chabinga from claiming the PF presidency, ZNBC and ZANIS, both government-controlled media, aired his press conference, demonstrating the UPND’s willingness to trample on the rule of law for its own political advantage. This behavior reveals an alarming, calculated objective: to reduce PF to political irrelevance, erasing it from Zambia’s political landscape and depriving the country of a genuine opposition.

This ongoing political interference is a direct assault on Zambia’s democratic foundations. By installing UPND surrogates as PF leaders, the UPND is not simply undermining a political party—it is rendering Zambia’s largest opposition party a hollow, powerless shadow. This is not about fostering healthy political competition; it is about manipulating the system to ensure that any opposition exists only as a token, under the complete control of the ruling party.

The UPND’s True Motive: A Ruthless Power Grab at the Expense of Democracy

In a functioning democracy, opposition parties are essential. They are the guardians of checks and balances, upholders of accountability, and voices for the diverse concerns of the population. Yet, the UPND’s strategy of endorsing weak, government-backed surrogates to take over PF’s leadership is a clear effort to create a compliant, ineffective opposition that serves the interests of the ruling party alone.

If left unchecked, this politically engineered manipulation will permanently alter Zambia’s political landscape, entrenching one-party dominance and eroding the very foundation of multi-party democracy. A government that truly respects democratic values would seek to strengthen the opposition, not obliterate it. The UPND’s actions force us to confront a chilling question: Is this government committed to democracy, or is it simply using democracy as a tool to consolidate and retain power?

State Media and Judicial Integrity: Both Under Attack

The government-controlled media’s role in broadcasting Chabinga’s press conference, in flagrant defiance of a court injunction, raises grave concerns about media impartiality and the independence of institutions in Zambia. When state-run outlets like ZNBC and ZANIS become propaganda arms of the government, the very idea of an unbiased, public platform for debate and discussion is destroyed. In a true democracy, the media should serve as a neutral space for diverse perspectives—not as a mouthpiece for the ruling party’s political agenda.

Equally disturbing is the government’s flagrant disregard for judicial authority. Judicial independence is the bedrock of any democratic society, ensuring that laws apply equally to all individuals and institutions, regardless of political affiliation. By openly flouting a court injunction against Chabinga’s leadership claims, the UPND is sending a dangerous message: that Zambia’s judiciary can be sidelined for political convenience. This undermines the rule of law, weakens public trust in the judicial system, and endangers Zambia’s democratic stability. If this trend continues unchecked, we will be left with a government that operates without any legal or institutional constraints, creating a state where power is abused and the rule of law is meaningless.

A Call for Immediate Action: Defend Democracy, Defend Zambia

The UPND’s interference in PF’s leadership is nothing short of an assault on Zambia’s democratic norms. Zambians deserve a political system where leaders rise to power based on merit, ideas, and popular support—not through government manipulation. If this manipulation continues, the UPND’s actions will destabilize Zambia’s political environment, silence dissent, and destroy any meaningful opposition.

For Zambia’s democracy to thrive, it is essential that transparency, accountability, and respect for the rule of law are upheld. It is not just the responsibility of the government to protect these values, but also of civil society, the media, and every citizen. The UPND’s actions serve as a wake-up call to all Zambians: now is the time to demand unwavering commitment to democracy and integrity from political institutions. If Zambia is to preserve its democratic legacy, citizens must actively defend these core principles, ensuring that the future is shaped by free, fair, and open political competition.

Conclusion: Zambia Deserves True Representation and Uncompromised Accountability

The UPND government’s shift from Sampa to Chabinga illustrates an alarming willingness to manipulate Zambia’s democratic institutions for short-term political gain. This raises critical questions: Why is the government so determined to dismantle PF’s leadership? What will this political interference mean for Zambia’s future as a multi-party democracy?

For Zambia’s democracy to survive, the Hichilema administration must deliver transparency and accountability to its citizens. The strength of Zambia’s political system lies in its diversity, its independent institutions, and its commitment to genuine political competition. These pillars of democracy cannot be sacrificed for fleeting political advantage.

Now, more than ever, Zambians must demand a political environment that respects judicial independence, values a free and impartial media, and prioritizes the integrity of the democratic process. By standing firm in defense of these principles, citizens can safeguard their democratic rights and secure a resilient political landscape for future generations. To compromise on democracy for short-term political convenience is to betray Zambia’s future—Zambians deserve better, and it is time they demand it.

About the cooler box: What is wrong with Zambians?

…Zambians would rather watch a truck than watch their stomachs that have been affected by the high cost of living….

From  Fr. Hilary Mulenga

I’ve watched with so much mesmerization how the famous cooler box has become even more popular than some of our politicians. Some of our politicians used to be greeted with pomp and splendour the way the cooler box is being greeted now. 

But as of today, if we were to compare the crowds that are greeting the cooler box, many of our politicians should be getting uneasy. If the cooler box was to be on our ballot, am sure someone would have fired or appointed judges just to stop it!

First of all, it is naive to think that the cooler box will solve our problems including loadshedding and the soaring prices of essential commodities. It is naive to think that the cooler box will even solve the problem of national leadership including that of the presidency. I think at at moment we have a President who thinks so much more about himself other than what we Zambians are going through. (I am yet to recover from the shock that he can even parade young Chipo Mwanawasa just to kill off some of the perceptions that people have about his relationship with her.)

Going back to the cooler box, which for me is more popular now even if we put HH and ECL together, the nation has either lost its moral compass or has misplaced its priorities.

Zambians would rather go and celebrate the “Trojan horse” that is going to milk them of their natural resources than protest on the roads why we have longer hours of loadshedding.

Zambians would rather watch a truck than watch their stomachs that have been affected by the high cost of living. In short, Zambians would rather celebrate a machine rather than appreciate the problems that this nation has been going through and even celebrate (if at all) that the government is doing something to resolve these problems.

Where we have missed it as a nation is that we have at times failed to celebrate what can better our lives. We have rather celebrated what others will think of us. This is the same reason with the “Trojan horse” that is being transported and celebrated on our roads. For example, apart from saying it will help our Mines, have Zambians asked how it will benefit them? Have Zambians asked if it will end the incessant problems of loadshedding and high cost of living? Have Zambians asked if the same box will help our Judiciary that is now fixing people who may just be against a government position or are a threat to it? Is the cooler box going to help Zambians appreciate the prophetic role of the church that the UPND government has relegated to the gutters? Is the cooler box going to stop the widening space of lack of democratic rights and the incessant attacks on the church that especially plays a prophetic role of reminding the governemtn about it’s prerogatives?

Edgar Lungu: The Accidental President Who Seduced Zambia.

By Linda Banks

SUSSEX, Nov 10-This article is not about assessing Edgar Lungu’s leadership qualities or his tenure as President of Zambia. Those discussions can wait another day. Instead, I want to zero in on the aspects of Lungu’s personality that have made him a memorable figure in Zambian politics that some citizens want him back. Beyond his political decisions, Edgar Lungu has a set of unique and positive attributes that, love him or hate him, has left a lasting impression on Zambia. From his love of dancing to his habit of casually stopping at markets or streets to greet people, he demonstrated a level of openness that few leaders achieve.

One of Lungu’s most memorable qualities was his genuine love for connecting with people. Known for his dance moves, he often joined in local celebrations and public events, showcasing a lighthearted side that made him relatable. This personal touch made him incredibly popular and accessible, allowing citizens to see him not just as a distant figure of authority, but as one of their own. His impromptu stops at markets and street corners to greet citizens reflected his respect for everyday people and his desire to stay grounded.

In this way, Lungu’s approach mirrors that of several other world leaders who embraced a similar, accessible persona. For instance, former British Prime Minister Boris Johnson was known for his informal, sometimes unconventional style, often breaking away from the typical rigidity of British politics. Johnson’s approachability shone through in moments such as his playful interaction during a diplomatic trip to Japan in 2015, when he joined a rugby match with children and famously tackled a young boy. This mix of charm and humor helped Johnson connect with the public in a relatable way, making him appear approachable despite the formal nature of his office.

Similarly, former U.S. President Barack Obama frequently demonstrated his relatability through his interactions with citizens. Obama was known for stopping at local diners, cafes, and casual eateries, where he would take time to speak with everyday Americans. In one notable instance, he surprised customers by visiting a barbecue restaurant in Texas, where he casually ordered food and even joked with a man who challenged him to arm wrestle for the meal. This warmth and ease with people helped make Obama one of the most personally popular U.S. presidents, as citizens saw him as someone who genuinely enjoyed being among them.

In addition, former and current U.S. President elect (Donald Trump) used a similar approach to connect directly with his base. Known for his populist style, Trump frequently conducted rallies with a conversational tone, addressing crowds in a way that felt personal and unscripted. His impromptu visits to local diners and fast-food chains reinforced his image as a man of the people. A memorable example came in 2023, when Trump made a highly publicized stop at a McDonald’s in East Palestine, Ohio. By mingling with locals and ordering fast food, Trump was able to reinforce his bond with supporters, portraying himself as “one of the people.”

Like Johnson, Obama, and Trump, Edgar Lungu’s approachable style resonated deeply with Zambian citizens. His love for dancing and his habit of stopping to greet people on the street or in markets showcased a humility that set him apart. While his leadership might be a topic for future analysis, Lungu’s accessible persona undoubtedly made him a beloved figure in Zambia, as he embodied a leader who was both relatable and genuinely interested in connecting with his people.

Lungu also seemed to be a bit of a fashion icon, but apart from that,Lungu has a distinct wit that has both surprised and entertained Zambians. A recent example of this came when the incumbent president criticized his behavior as “silly and infantile.” Rather than taking offense, Lungu responded by singing the popular song Nalitumpa Ine (“Yes, I was foolish”), showing a self-deprecating humor that softened the tension. This moment showed a level of resilience and charm that not every politician possesses.

Lungu has also been known for his loyalty to those who supported him. Throughout his time in office, he treated his allies well, rewarding those who stood by him even in challenging times. Bowman Lusambo, Innocent Kalimanshi, and other former ministers and cadres are prime examples of individuals who benefitted from Lungu’s loyalty. He gave them opportunities and influence, building a network of supporters who were fiercely loyal to him.

Yet, it’s worth noting that Lungu’s loyalty was not always reciprocated. Some individuals who once received his favor, like Miles Sampa and even the former Australian Ambassador to Zambia, eventually distanced themselves or turned their backs on him after he left office. Nevertheless, Lungu’s dedication to his circle of allies is a testament to his commitment and loyalty, qualities that are rare in the competitive world of politics.

It’s therefore crucial for a leader’s minders to remember the importance of keeping their principal accessible to his base, media personalities and journalists who helped elevate them to office. These voices hold significant influence, as the saying goes, “the pen is mightier than the sword.” When election time comes around, the support and goodwill of these media allies can be invaluable, and leaders who remain connected to them are often better positioned to win the public’s trust and favor.

In summary, Edgar Lungu brought more than political decisions to the Zambian landscape. He was a stylish, witty, and loyal figure whose personality traits made him a unique leader. Regardless of how history may judge his presidency, these attributes will remain a part of his legacy.