LUBINDA WALKS TO FREEDOM AFTER COURT ACQUITS HIM

13

LUBINDA WALKS TO FREEDOM AFTER COURT ACQUITS HIM

LUSAKA senior magistrate Sandford Ngobola has acquitted former Patriotic Front(PF) vice president, Given Lubinda in a matter he was facing four counts of possession of property suspected of being proceeds of crime.

The court said the state failed to prove that Lubinda acquired the properties through proceeds of crime.

13 COMMENTS

  1. These directionless reporters! When did Given Lubinda become “former” PF vice president! If he’s not the vice president of PF, then who is? If it’s that Hichilema/ Hasampa project which is making you pretend not to remember who the VP for PF is, you are reminded that that one is a failed project! Edgar Lungu is president of PF, his vice is Given Lubinda. Nobody outside PF can change that! And now Hichilema and Upnd have brought more problems to themselves by sponsoring a Tonga chap to sue for legality or illegality of Edgar Lungu standing for 2021 elections! So if the Concourt says it was illegal, a change from their previous rulings, then the 2021 elections will be declared invalid, and fresh elections will have to be held. Meaning all appointments Hichilema has made from 2021 to date are invalid! So we revert back to those who were in office before 2021 elections! This is what desperation from Hichilema and his Upnd will cause! Their aim is to bar Edgar Lungu from standing, only to find themselves pushed out of government! That’s how God works! Through human beings! God help us! Twachula!

      • Unfortunately,Kubeja Badala that would be the legal position.
        You be angry with Mandanda, I’m afraid he is right. Government would have to revert to the pre-August 2021setup.

        • Ba Bacembele, a loser cannot invalidate the 2021 elections. If the loser had won, then it would a different issue altogether.

          The fact is the loser was the illegal participant in the elections. Maybe he can be charged for illegally taking part in the election if there is such a law.

          • You argue very well. All contests have different rules.The closest for our argument is FIFA. If a team or country fields an ineligible player in the World Cup or any FIFA game regardless of the outcome,that will attract sanctions and nullification of the result. If a trophy or cup had been won, it will be withdrawn and awarded to the runners up. With the ECZ the election would be re-run whether Lungu won or not, with another PF candidate running against the other presidential candidates.
            The constitutional court if it has discretion may rule otherwise and keep HH in power.This would be the outcome even without judicial discretion as the courts are now under Executive control.

  2. Which law states that the election would be invalid?? In law there’s no common sense you just have to state what the laws says. If one candidate is disqualified that does not invalidate the process.

  3. Wasted efforts, wasted resources, wasted energy, next it will be Bowman, there are no prisons for the rich and we’ll connected.

  4. The reporting is so misleading .LUBINDA WALKS FREE was he incarcerated? If so where. Some of your writings you guys is so poor.

  5. When an innocent person walks to freedom justice is done, when a guilty person is jailed justice is done, when a guilty person walks to freedom, injustice is done and when an innocent person is jailed injustice is done. Good investigation, good prosecution and good adjudication enable justice to be done. Has justice been done in the Lubinda criminal prosecution? To be honest, I do not know. But I hope there are members of the Judiciary who are asking how a country with very little mortgage lending has a real estate boom.

  6. So everyone is getting acquitted, or being given a Nolle, or immunity.

    No one is going to jail.

    So now it looks like he lied that PF leaders were corrupt, just so he could get elected. This is what it looks like to voters. And when we call him a natural born liar, he arrests us.

    Vote wisely in 2026.

  7. If he is not guilty or if there is no evidence of his guilty then naturally he will be acquitted as courts are free to rule either way without pressure.

  8. You argue very well. All contests have different rules.The closest for our argument is FIFA. If a team or country fields an ineligible player in the World Cup or any FIFA game regardless of the outcome,that will attract sanctions and nullification of the result. If a trophy or cup had been won, it will be withdrawn and awarded to the runners up. With the ECZ the election would be re-run whether Lungu won or not, with another PF candidate running against the other presidential candidates.
    The constitutional court if it has discretion may rule otherwise and keep HH in power.This would be the outcome even without judicial discretion as the courts are now under Executive control.

  9. Maybe, the person who is subsequently ruled ineligible to have participated has their results nullified. In this case it would be an academic exercise. The status of the person standing who is subject to a court review would be in question not the whole election.
    Just a thought.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here