Home Blog Page 673

Donald Trump’s would-be assassin had explosives in the car and home -FBI

The Federal Bureau of Investigation has revealed that Donald Trump’s would-be assassin, Thomas Matthew Crooks had explosives in the car when he drove to the Pennsylvania rally and used a firearm purchased by his father.

Authorities found the ‘explosive devices’ in the 20-year-old’s vehicle and home after Secret Service agents sh0t and k!lled him seconds after he opened fire on the former president, the Wall Street Journal reported.

FBI finds b0mbs in Trump sho0ter Thomas Crooks Matthews

Matthew Crooks, 53, legally purchased the AR-15 that his son used to attempt to assassinate Trump on Saturday.

Thomas Crooks k!lled one rallygoer, Corey Comperatore, and critically injured two others who are being treated at Allegheny General Hospital in Pittsburgh while attempting to kill Trump.

FBI finds b0mbs in Trump sho0ter Thomas Crooks Matthews

A bullet struck the former president in his right ear but his campaign says he is ‘fine.’

Crooks, who graduated high school just two years ago, reportedly parked his vehicle near the rally site in Butler, Pennsylvania on Saturday before scaling to the roof of a nearby industrial manufacturing building to carry out his attack.

Authorities claim that after police received multiple reports of suspicious packages near where the shooter parked his car it prompted them to dispatch bomb technicians.

Investigators worked well into the night to make sure the scene was clear, which included searching Crooks’ home and speaking with his family.

The FBI search led to the discovery of more bombs in the family’s Bethel Park home, according to reports.

Members of the community where Crooks is believed to have lived with his parents were swarmed by police and the Secret Service on Sunday morning.

Crooks was killed by USSS seconds after opening fire on the former president and presumed Republican presidential nominee on Saturday.

The would-be assassin was a registered Republican and a 2022 high school graduate. Records show Crooks donated on the day of the 2020 inauguration to a progressive group backing President Joe Biden.

Crooks sh0t at Trump with an AR-style rifle from a rooftop 130 yards from the rally stage in Butler just before 6:15 p.m. on Saturday.

Black man charged with m&rder!ng two white g@y men whose remains were found in a suitcase

0

A black man has been charged with two white g@y men who were ex-lovers after their remains were found in a suitcase.

Police revealed that the two men whose remains were found in Bristol and London last week belong to a French national and his British ex-partner.

Yostin Andres Mosquera, 34, who had been staying with them is charged with the m%rder of two men, named by the Met Police as 62-year-old Albert Alfonso and 71-year-old Paul Longworth.

The two men had previously been in a relationship and still lived together at the flat in Shepherd’s Bush. They were known to the suspect, who had been staying with them for a short period of time, police said.

Mr Longworth was British and Mr Alfonso was originally from France but had obtained British citizenship.

Police said that they do not believe there was a ‘homophobic motive’ from the evidence gathered so far, but they have initially categorised the incident as a ‘hate crime’ under national guidelines.

Avon and Somerset Police officers were first alerted to a man acting suspiciously on Clifton Suspension Bridge on Wednesday night.

They swooped on the scene within 10 minutes, where they found two suitcases dumped with human remains.

Man charged with m&rder!ng two white g@y men whose remains were found in a suitcase
The suspect, who had travelled there by taxi, had already fled the scene.

Mosquera, of Scotts Road, west London, was arrested by armed police at Bristol Temple Meads Station in the early hours of Saturday.

He will appear at Wimbledon Magistrates’ Court later today.

Deputy Assistant Commissioner Andy Valentine said: ‘My thoughts are first and foremost with Albert and Paul’s loved ones who are coming to terms with this terrible news.

‘While we do not believe either of them had any close family, we have identified other next of kin who have been informed and are being supported by specialist officers.

‘We are continuing to try and identify any extended family members.

‘I know that this awful incident will cause concern not just among residents in Shepherds Bush but in the wider LGBTQ+ community across London.

‘I hope it will be of some reassurance that whilst enquiries are still ongoing and the investigation is at a relatively early stage, we are not currently looking for anyone else in connection with the two murders.

‘Officers have worked with the pan-London LGBTQ+ Independent Advisory Group (IAG) since the identity of the two victims and their sexuality was established. Their advice, expertise and support for the investigation has been extremely valuable.

‘We will continue to work with them, and with other partners including local IAGs, as the investigation and the policing response continues.’

I have no doubts the sh0oter had help from an agency or govt – Sniper who holds world record for longest k!ll weighs in on Trump sh0oting

A veteran whose team holds the world record for longest confirmed sniper kill claims Donald Trump’s shooter ‘had help’ as he weighed in on the assassination attempt of the former American president.

Dallas Alexander, who spent 14 years in a sniper team for the Canadian military doing close protection for major world leaders including the Canadian prime minister, said in a video that the 20-year-old who opened fire at the former president’s rally Saturday night definitely had help from the inside.

I have no doubts the sh0oter had help from an agency, an organization or the government – Sniper who holds world record for longest k!ll weighs in on Trump sh0oting (video)

‘I’m very familiar with the layout of these types of things and what the job should be, and yesterday what happened, I have no doubts in my mind that the shooter had help from somewhere within an agency, an organization or the government,’ he said in a video posted to his Instagram and X account.

Crooks laid down on the roof of a building just 130 yards from where Trump was speaking in full view of his supporters as he fired towards the stage.

Alexander says he should not have been able to get that close.

‘You cannot, in broad daylight, get onto a rooftop within, what looked like a couple hundred yards if that [of the president]. You can’t get in that position with a gun when there’s a president speaking.

‘It cannot be done,’ Alexander insisted.

‘Like, you don’t even have to be a sniper – it’s the most f obvious thing, most obvious place in the whole world.

‘You could be like a seventh-grader – like “What do we have to do for security?” Well, let’s look at these rooftops that are almost within zeroing range of a rifle,’ he joked.

‘So something happened, and I’m not pointing fingers at anyone. It’s just too obvious that this guy had help getting there.

‘So whether it’s someone turned a blind eye or it was strategically planned, it had to be planned to a certain level, because events like that, security like that, it’s not a small thing – and that is an obvious place to be.’

Alexander went on to say that he would find it ‘very weird’ that if ‘someone is good enough to stalk within 200 yards of one of the hardest-to-stalk targets in the whole world,’ they would not miss the shot.

‘Like if you have the skill set to get in there, avoiding all these security, all different layers of security, then you will have the skillset to hit that first round,’ he explained.

‘It just doesn’t make any sense.’

The bullet apparently intended for Trump on Saturday night whizzed by his right cheek, and struck his right ear.

‘So my opinion is – and whether this comes out now or way later – is that this guy had help from somewhere, and I think that’s obviously concerning,’ Alexander said.

‘I think it’s going to be a while, it’s all your going to see for the next little while,’ he added.

‘Anyway, just because I keep getting asked, that’s my two cents.’

man donated his sp£rm to his sister so she can start a family, making him the uncle and also biological dad of her child

0

A man donated his sp£rm to his sister so she can start a family, making him the uncle and also biological dad of her child.

Adam Zayden, 25, loved his sister Jade, 29 so much so when she decided to have a baby with her partner, he decided to help.

The prospects of a donor daddy were slim for Jade and her wife Eefje, 30, who had been trying to get pregnant since 2018.

After three years of listening to their struggle to start a family, Adam made them an offer.

“They’d become so frustrated with the donor process — it just felt like the right, and ‘easy’ thing to do,” Adam, a social media influencer from Newham, London, told South West News Service.

“This whole process has made me so much closer to my sister and her partner.”

Jade, a researcher and developer, and Eefje, a veterinarian, had been determined to have a biological child.

“They essentially started ‘dating around’ for a donor,” Adam recalled, explaining that their insurance policy in Amsterdam, where the couple is currently based, doesn’t cover artificial insemination — making the search for a father “quite extensive.”

To make matters worse, many of the available donors were insisting they conceive the “natural way,” i.e. sexual intercourse as opposed to intracervical insemination (ICI) when a woman inserts a man’s sperm into her cervix with a syringe-like device.

One sp£rm donor even reneged on his donor contract.

“He literally turned around and said he wanted to do things the ‘natural’ way,” Adam said. “He wanted to sleep with my sister-in-law — which was never in the realm of what they wanted.”

Jade described the search as an “emotional rollercoaster.”

“You’re opening yourself up in the most vulnerable of times,” she told South West News Service. “You’re welcoming, essentially, strangers, into your life. You’re then dependent on strangers to help fulfill one of your biggest dreams.”

Added Eefje, “You’re also being exposed to a lot of potential hate. Whether that’s from sharing your experience, or just in general while searching for a donor.”

Tired of being disappointed by unserious donors, the couple finally approached Adam to beg for his sp£rm.

“They’d joked before about me giving them mine, but I didn’t realize they were actually open to that,” Adam remembered.

He called it one of the easiest decisions he’s had to make.

“It really wasn’t that big of a deal. I’m a queer person myself, and I don’t really see myself having kids,” he said.

The trio worked for months — between December 2021 and June 2022 — to get pregnant.

“Every night during that one-week period, Jade would take the dog out for a walk,” Adam said of that time.

“I’d go upstairs, do my thing, and hand Eefje the sperm.”

In June 2022, Eefje’s pregnancy test finally came back positive. Their baby was born on March 18, 2023.

“I am his uncle, but I’m known as ‘bibi,’” Adam, now also the baby’s biological father, explained. “He’s a very happy, jolly kid.”

Jade has said she’s pleased with the outcome of she and Eefje’s donor search.

“It was great having someone you really know and trust, because it’s such an emotional time,” she said.

US federal judge dismisses the classified documents case against Donald Trump

0

A US federal judge on Monday, July 15 dismissed the classified documents case against Donald Trump, clearing one of the major legal challenges facing the former US president.

In a 93-page ruling, District Judge Aileen Cannon said the appointment of special counsel Jack Smith violated the Constitution.

“In the end, it seems the Executive’s growing comfort in appointing ‘regulatory’ special counsels in the more recent era has followed an ad hoc pattern with little judicial scrutiny,” Cannon wrote.

The ruling by Cannon, a judge Trump appointed in 2020, comes on the first day of the Republican National Convention.

Judge dismisses classified documents case against Donald Trump
Judge dismisses classified documents case against Donald Trump

Many legal experts had viewed the classified documents case as the strongest one of the four cases that were pending against Trump.

Smith’s Special counsel had charged Trump last year with taking classified documents from the White House and resisting the government’s attempts to retrieve the materials. He pleaded not guilty.

In a separate criminal case brought by Smith against Trump in Washington, DC, the special counsel was pursuing federal charges stemming from Trump’s attempts to overturn the results of the 2020 election. Trump also faces a state-level election subversion case in Georgia and he was convicted of state crimes in New York earlier this year for his role in a hush money payment scheme before the 2016 election.

Weeks ago, Cannon held a hearing on the issue several weeks ago, pushing attorneys to explain exactly how Smith’s investigation into Trump was being funded.

The judge’s questions were so pointed that special counsel attorney James Pearce argued that, even if Cannon were to throw out the case due to an appointments clause issue, the Justice Department was “prepared” to fund Smith’s cases through trial if necessary.

Cannon said in her ruling today that the special counsel’s position “effectively usurps” Congress’ “important legislative authority” by giving it to the head of a department DOJ, in this case – to appoint such an official.

“If the political branches wish to grant the Attorney General power to appoint Special Counsel Smith to investigate and prosecute this action with the full powers of a United States Attorney, there is a valid means by which to do so,” she wrote.

The Justice Department “could reallocate funds to finance the continued operation of Special Counsel Smith’s office,” but said it’s not yet clear whether a newly-brought case would pass legal muster.

“For more than 18 months, Special Counsel Smith’s investigation and prosecution has been financed by substantial funds drawn from the Treasury without statutory authorization, and to try to rewrite history at this point seems near impossible,” Cannon wrote.

“The Court has difficulty seeing how a remedy short of dismissal would cure this substantial separation-of-powers violation, but the answers are not entirely self-evident, and the caselaw is not well developed.”

She noted in her ruling that Smith’s team “suggested” at a court hearing on the matter that they could restructure the office’s funding to satisfy her concerns.

IG influencer jailed for turning followers into s£x workers

0

A US-based wellness influencer Kat Torres has been sentenced to eight years in prison for Human trafficking and enslaving women.

Her sentencing follows a harrowing human trafficking case uncovered by the FBI. The investigation revealed disturbing details about the former Brazillian model’s activities, including allegations of enslaving and trafficking women who lived with her.

The case came into light after two women who were residing with Torres went missing in 2022. Subsequently, many women came forward with chilling testimonies of their time under Torres’ control.

They spoke of being initially drawn to her glamorous lifestyle and her purported abilities to predict the future using spiritual powers, which she often showcased on Brazilian TV and through high-profile associations, including rumored relationships with Hollywood figures

One of Torres’ former associates, identified as Ana, recounted to media, her ordeal after moving to New York to work as Torres’ live-in assistant.

Despite promises of a decent salary, Ana found herself in squalid conditions, forced to endure sleep deprivation and menial tasks without compensation. She described the house as filthy, with deplorable living conditions that included sleeping on a urine-soaked sofa.

The situation escalated when Torres relocated to Texas with two other women, Desirre and Leticia, under the guise of a healing and life coaching retreat.

The environment quickly turned oppressive, with restrictions on movement and alleged involvement in activities such as prostitution and witchcraft.

Desirre, one of the victims, disclosed how she was coerced into working at a strip club and subjected to Torres’ manipulative control, including financial quotas and enforced isolation from others.

Soon, Torres convinced Desiree to turn to prostitution. If she didn’t meet the earning quotas that Torres set, she was not allowed to return to the house that night.

“I ended up sleeping on the street several times because I couldn’t reach that,” Desirre said.

In September, the two women’s friends and family launched social media campaigns to find them. To escape media attention, Torres and the women travelled from Texas to Maine. From there, the two were made to post Instagram videos denying being held captive and demanded people stop searching for them.

The case has shocked many, with over 20 women stepping forward to share similar tales of exploitation and deception by Torres. They continue to undergo psychological therapy to cope with the trauma inflicted during their time under her influence.

England’s big problem is NOT Gareth Southgate. Time to talk less and work more!

0

🚨🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿England’s big problem is NOT Gareth Southgate. Time to talk less and work more!

England has never quite had an identity. Random football fans will identify Spain with its tiki-taka, Italy with its ‘catennacio’, Germany with its grit, Brazil with its samba football (‘ginga’) and the list goes on. Alterations can be made to these by different managers but the nucleus or DNA remains in the players.

As for England nothing can be said really. It’s generally always the case of putting together big Prem names that can’t find chemistry. English sides a lot better than the current didn’t do any better. In football, winning at times can be down to grace but in England’s case is more about development issues.

Germany was in this situation by the end of the 20th century. A 3-0 loss in the hands of Croatia in the 1998 World Cup spurred the Germans to take a bold step and build contingency for the future which they enjoy today. The key architect was Klinsmann who took over in 2004 with the objective of giving Germany an identity. His cause was helped by a powerful academy programme initiated by the German FA in 2001. The academies were not just run by clubs alone but were supervised by committee comprising members from the FA, German league and the clubs.

Before these changes, 60% of players in Germany’s top-flight (Bundesliga) were foreigners. This was a drawback to the plan as the youngsters emerging from the academies had to fully exercise the identity by practising at the top for the benefit of the national team. By 2013, mentalities had changed for the good and majority of players in the Bundesliga were German nationals. In this case, the Bundesliga identifies with a particular style of play which makes it easy for the national team given its players have come through similar systems. Ever wondered how Holland stays competitive in major tournaments despite not having a top 5 league? It’s about developing an identity.

The same can be said of Spain’s LALIGA which is always the backbone to the national team’s success. The academies share similar traits and ideologies and when the players , albeit playing for different clubs, come together, they gel like they’ve been playing together for quite long. They easily identify with one another. Note that while different clubs could make modifications to this system, the players’ DNA from the academy doesn’t change. Today, the Spanish model is the most sought after, reason why majority of the finest coaches around are from Spain (check the EPL itself for reference).

The English must return to the drawing board and build an identity. This, nonetheless , will be difficult because of the Premier League factor. Being the league with the greatest audience, the EPL has become an unmatched financial juggernaut. While clubs in Spain, Germany, France, Holland etc are forced to look into their academies for reinforcement (thereby promoting homegrown and promoting the need for promoting homegrown), EPL club owners get more and more excited to spend large generally on oversea talents (to the detriment of academy products). In 2023, for instance, a study revealed that LALIGA had the highest percentage of domestic players compared to all the other top 5 leagues. Specifically, it was revealed that LALIGA boasted 410 Spanish nationals as compared to the EPL’s 234 nationals. We are talking about 410 players with similar ideas of how football should be played. That’s where Spain wins. Many would have thought a Spain squad, 1/3 of which is made up of players from Real Sociedad and Athletic Bilbao, can be pushovers to players whose individual market prices can pay about half of the value of the LALIGA sides, but it’s about system and identity.

Individual English clubs exhibit different identities – City is going Spanish, Liverpool had the German ‘gegenpress’, etc – but there is no national identity. To check national identity, watch matches in the lower divisions. For instance , if you watch a 5th division Spanish side or even the women’s team, you’ll see the same traits you see in the other higher divisions in the country (patient build-up possession football). England will only find stability with an identity, but that at the moment that seems to be continuously exchanged for the EPL’s ever-growing expenses. This whole analysis does not mean England cannot win but it’s about finding sustainability.

Ade Divine

Trump names J.D. Vance as his VP pick

0

Donald Trump has chosen Republican Ohio Sen. J.D. Vance as his running mate.
In a post on Truth Social, the former president wrote that “after lengthy deliberation and thought, and considering the tremendous talents of many others, I have decided that the person best suited to assume the position of Vice President of the United States is Senator J.D. Vance of the Great State of Ohio.”

Vance, a 39-year-old who grew up in Kentucky and Ohio, has served as a junior U.S. senator in Ohio since 2023 and rose to prominence in 2016 with his.

JD Vance, 39, the junior senator from Ohio, had gained attention with his support for Trump and his alignment with Trump’s base issues. A Yale graduate and author of Hillbilly Elegy, Vance’s political transformation from a “never-Trumper” to a Trump ally has been notable. Although he has expressed a preference for continuing his Senate career, he remains a potential VP candidate. Trump has reportedly dismissed rumors that Vance’s beard might be a disqualifying factor, showing flexibility in his considerations.

In the Running were
Doug Burgum, 67, governor of North Dakota, has impressed Trump with his pragmatic approach and political acumen. Though Burgum’s presidential bid was lackluster, his endorsement of Trump and conservative credentials, including support for a restrictive abortion stance, have kept him in the mix. Despite potential issues with his position on abortion, Trump values Burgum’s low-key demeanor and business background.

Marco Rubio, 53, the Florida senator, has evolved from a 2016 rival to a strong Trump supporter. Rubio’s youth, charisma, and potential to appeal to Latino voters make him a compelling choice. However, the constitutional requirement for presidential and vice-presidential candidates to be from different states poses a complication, as both Trump and Rubio are Floridians. This issue could be addressed through a significant electoral win or a change in residency.

Tim Scott: The South Carolina senator is notable for his optimistic conservatism and was a vocal supporter of Trump during his primary campaign. Despite a lackluster presidential run, his endorsement of Trump and strong performances at rallies have kept him in consideration.

Byron Donalds: A rising star in conservative circles, the 45-year-old congressman from Florida has gained attention for his promotion of black conservatism and his alignment with Trump. While his prospects have recently cooled, his profile remains one to watch.

Elise Stefanik: As the highest-ranking Republican woman in the House, Stefanik has shifted from a moderate to a staunch Trump ally. Though she has expressed eagerness to serve in any capacity within the Trump administration, she is less prominent on recent VP lists.

Tulsi Gabbard: A former Democrat and critic of establishment policies, Gabbard’s inclusion would be a significant surprise. Her unconventional political background and recent alignment with conservative media make her an intriguing but unlikely choice.

Kristi Noem: The governor of South Dakota was once a top choice among Trump supporters. However, controversy over her memoir detailing acts of animal cruelty has diminished her chances.

As Trump prepares to make his choice, the dynamics of his running mate selection reflect a blend of loyalty, strategic positioning, and potential electoral impact.

UKA MUST PUT UP A TESTED TEAM: Nawakwi could make a good running mate to Lungu

0

UKA MUST PUT UP A TESTED TEAM

With general elections approaching, calls to identify a team to present to Zambians are growing within the main opposition grouping, United Kwacha Alliance – UKA

UKA an Alliance of the Opposition political parties poses a big threat to the ruling party, UPND and its leader Hakainde Hichilema.

The Hichilema administration is playing all its cards to prevent UKA from registration. Home Affairs and Internal Security Minister Jack Mwiimbu whose Ministry has prevented any political gatherings since coming to power is doing everything to stop UKA from registering.

Members within the opposition alliance are getting concerned with the time saving a team to be presented to Zambians must be constituted and not waste anymore time on the registration.

The feeling among the members is that 2026 is not for trial and error. They want a tested with experience leadership must be yardstick for UKA to pick its leadership.

Zambians cannot afford another trial after the poor performance of Hichilema who had promised to use his economic successful vast experience in private sector.

Three years down the line, the results are there for everyone to see. Zambians are hungry. The economy is on its knees. It’s not getting any better as he continues to promise.

People cannot make another gamble. A tried and testes leadership would be ideal.Edgar Lungu is seriously an ideal candidate but must be sourunded by a strong team and Edith Nawakwi ranks high in everything.

The team in UKA seem to have no problem running with Lungu. The ground seems fertile for Lungu hence the panic by the Hichilema administration.

Hichilema has been informed that he would have difficulty facing Lungu on the ballot as things stand hence everything is being done to block his candidature.

The concern of some members of UKA is that PF is dominating and a mistake must not be made that UKA is PF as this could work against the alliance. So far, Secretary General Lucky Mulusa and his Deputy Mumbi Phiri are all PF.

So a mistake must not be made to pick a running mate from PF. Lungu is perceived as a weak leader who needs a firm experienced person as a running mate and Nawakwi so far is the best suit.

Nawakwi is a courageous female politician who has served as Minister in various ministries. She was the fist female to hold the Ministry of Finance. She also served as Minister of Agriculture, Energy and Labour.

She and other Ministers opposed then their Boss Frederick Chiluba bid to run for a third term and were fired from MMD. They formed Forum for Democracy and Development (FDD) where she was elected Vice president to Lt Gen Christon Tembo. She took over after his demise.

Nawakwi heads FDD which is part of the UKA Alliance. There are feelings among some members that she could make a good running mate to Lungu.

SOURCE: Zambian Eye

I have solutions to electricity crisis…Not trusting your own is  a problem – Professor Clive Chirwa

0

Professor Clive Chirwa writes…

Hi Fellows. This is not a surprise to me. When I raised these issues, you wanted to issue me with a red card.
Now, politicians are calling us out to perform.

1) I have been talking about the useless Kariba dam rehabilitation. Wasting money that Zambia hasn’t got is nearing $1 billion, according to the EU office in Brussels. I am still waiting for a response.


2) Not trusting your own is also a problem. I have solutions, and we can do it. But you have to be serious. Over the past 25 years, I have given close to 100 solutions to many engineering problems that would have moved Zambia to another level. None has been implemented. But when foreigners present an idea like that, everybody jumps and implements the suggested by foreigners. This sickness in our heads must be eradicated.


The system the Chinese are talking about is the closed loop power generation. Where you utilise an external power source to prop up the head to be used in the power generation. What you have to make sure is that the energy differential is positive minimum 1.5 times for the system to be efficient.


3) This year, while in Zambia, I wanted to see the minister of energy. I wanted to see the managing Director ZESCO. None wanted to see me. I even went to see the lady permanent secretary who in the end sent her secretary to tell me that she was very busy. I even had a meeting with ERB DG, who even gave me the names of the key people at the ministry. But I had no luck. What I wanted was to give them one of my solutions for Kariba costing $ 65 million by using the same closed loop system that the Chinese were telling the President about by Introducing a mechanically generated head over the penstokes entry locations.


4) The solar farms are the simplest to implement. I approached REA many times in 2015 while I was on sabbatical at CBU. We had numerous meetings but all in vein.


5) Let us be serious. Zambia is not supposed to be experiencing loadshedding. The usage space is just too small vis-a-vis production. We must seriously sit down and look at the entire power generation components through transmission to end users. This is very simple for a Zambian transmission system that uni-directional.

Let us do it. I can help. Let us have a team to solve this. No bla bla bla…but action people are needed. I can chair the team. We cannot be embarrassed like this in public.
Best regards
Prof Clive Chirwa
12 July 2024.

I See division Between The Catholic Bishops And The Priests In Our Local Churches – Chilufya Tayali

0

By Chilufya Tayali

FORGIVE ME BISHOPS, I HAVE SINNED…: I SEE A DICOTOMY BETWEEN THE BISHOPS AND THE PRIESTS IN OUR LOCAL CHURCHES AND I WONDERING

As a Catholic, I would never dare to engage, or comment, on issues of Faith on my Bishops and Priests, or the clergy as it were, in public, but I am sure on general human welfare, social justice, human rights and good governance I can be allowed to put out my layman’s thoughts.

Firstly, I would like to appreciate the Zambia Episcopal Conference for their Pastoral letters that they publish reflecting various issues in our Country. Usually it is a true reflection of what many of us observe. Of course the Pastoral letter highlights both the positive and negative, so it is balanced and objective.

Unfortunately, actions of SOME of our Bishops give a different impression SOME KIND OF DUALISM. It is like they admonish the civil leadership during the day, but they wear black at night to go and fraternize with the perpetrators of the vices they condemn.

It give an impression that, their messages in the Pastoral letters is just a SMOKESCREEN yet behind closed doors, they are massaging these Government leaders with approbations. Which somehow seem to explain why these leaders are relentless in abusing their powers and ignoring the plight of the citizens.

The confidentiality of the content of the discussions makes it even worse, these are public leaders and we expect transparency, unless they if they tell us that their meetings are group Spiritual direction.

On the other hand we have seen a number of Priests pointing out some of the issues people complain about. The message is usually appreciated by the general public (all the people of God of GOODWILL).

However, the following day, some of these Priests, are censored, abused and the Church demonized by cadres, Govt officials INCLUDING THE ENTIRE PRESIDENT.

We have even seen some of them being summoned to appear before the Police to explain their sermons. Actually we would have seen some of them being arrested had not been for the indignation of the general public.

Nationally, when such things happen, many people expect that the leadership of the Church (Bishops) will come out in defense of their Priests and the Church, alas, we see the Bishops subtly inviting the Govt leaders to their Cathedrals and celebrate Mass in their honor as they invite them to address the congregants, albeit them issuing circulars warning Priests treat all the faithful the same.

I would cite a number of issues, or incidences where some of us would have loved to hear our Bishops pronounce themselves as Good Shepherds tending the sheep, it is not a court affidavit to convict anyone.

Please don’t get me wrong, anyone if free to attend Mass, and our Bishops (or the clergy as a whole) should be free to meet anyone at any time, but certain instances the impressions created is worrisome to the general public.

I am not a theologian but from my basic knowledge, I draw examples from Jesus who never showed any dualism in what he preached and his conduct.

Jesus also never left the public wondering about his position. And most importantly, he never gave an impression that he was more closer to the authorities than the poor suffering masses.

The Book of Matthew has many examples on how Jesus dealt with the authorities and I he unequivocally made is position known to both the authorities and the general public.

When there was a doubt, Jesus clearly settled the matter PUBLICLY, not going to the Kings palaces and have closed door meetings then come out smiling to take pictures as if everything was well.

Even under intense pressure, before Pilate, Jesus stood resolute and firm, no compromise.

Of course Jesus called some of the people working in the administrations, of the time, such as Matthew and Zacchaeus, among others, but he made sure they left their old ways and served the people.

But our Bishops, fraternize with the administration without any noticeable positive change for us to appreciate their interactions.

Anyway, I can go on and on, but I hope my message can be taken, otherwise, outside our Faith, we are seeing SOME of these Bishops to be highly compromised and it is difficult to defend our Church when we see screaming headlines in the daily tabloids.

Somehow, some of these Bishops are making some of us who are fighting the ills of this Govt rendered hopeless after suffering so much and being exiled.

Where will I draw my strength if my Bishops seem very comfortable and posing for pictures like they are ordaining our Priest to be their Arch-Archbishop for our nation.

I certainly don’t judge these leaders, but I speak out on the wrong things I see and urge them to change, but what do “I”, and many other advocates and oppositions get for speaking out.

These, and those other sins I may have forgotten, I ask for your forgiveness.

TAYALI THE PUBLIC LAWYER OF THE PUBLIC COURT OF OPINIONS!!!

SCANDAL EXPOSED; ACC Board Member and Commissioner exposes the deep-seated looting of the Treasury going on with the participation of State Chambers nestled and facilitated by ACC

0

SCANDAL EXPOSED; ACC Board Member and Commissioner, academic, researcher, University of Zambia Lecturer and Constitutional Lawyer, Dr. O’Brien Kaaba exposes the deep-seated looting of the Treasury going on with the participation of State Chambers nestled and facilitated by the Anti-Corruption Commission!

THREE THINGS THAT HAVE GONE WRONG WITH THE UPND GOVERNMENT’S FIGHT
AGAINST CORRUPTION AND WHAT THE PRESIDENT MUST DO

O’Brien Kaaba

..State Chambers are in the forefront of looting the Treasury, are a strong ally of corruption…

●ACC is captured and us unable to fight corruption in its current state.

● Judges are identified outside Lusaka to sign off the corrupt settlements.

● ACC DG threatened to sort me out and finish me for exposing corruption

The strong anti-corruption fight President Hichilema launched when he ascended to office has ebbed off and lost traction.

The institutions charged with fighting corruption are simply massaging, bandaging and covering up corruption.

Isn’t it strange that ACC can make headline news for arresting and prosecuting a poor clinical officer for signing off two employment contracts while the ACC has done nothing about the more cases involving
millions of dollars exposed in FIC reports?

Why should the poor be prosecuted aggressively while the rich and powerful are let off the hook and given immunity (read “rewarded”). Just what has gone wrong?

Here are my three (3) areas of vulnerability, which the President needs to urgently attend to if the fight has to be resuscitated, look credible and gain traction.

1.State Chambers are in the Forefront of Looting: State Chambers are in the forefront of cutting corrupt deals and facilitating corruption. This has put all law enforcement agencies in an awkward situation as state chambers ought to be an ally in fighting corruption. No serious crusade against corruption can yield fruits when the heart of the legal machinery for government is contaminated.

The level of corruption is sickening, to the extent that state chambers are the ones looking for litigants to sue the government and pre-agree to settle or enter consent orders involving huge sums of money.

The scheme has been perfected to the
extent that some orders are now signed using judges outside Lusaka to avoid public scrutiny and media attention in Lusaka.

The president needs to do two things:

a) dismiss his senior legal advisors and

b) either set up a commission of inquiry or authorize a special audit into all the high value payments authorized by state chambers in the last three years.

2.ACC is captured: It is a mistake to expect ACC to be an effective tool for fighting corruption in its current form. It is a captured institution. The forces that are ripping off the state resources through state chambers also have their stranglehold on ACC.

It is no wonder the media has been reporting that the ACC management has simply cut off the board from decision making at the ACC.

If the media reports are true, the ACC is not accountable to its board but to the same corrupt elements looting public resources.

This suggests the capture is so complete and corruption reigns with impunity.

To demonstrate how bad the situation is, a few days ago, I wrote a one pager opinion in my individual academic capacity indicating why I thought the fight against corruption was crumbling.

I never made any personal attack on anyone and focused my attention on institutional weaknesses. The morning after the article was published, the ACC Director General Tom Shamakamba called me through the phone of his deputy threatening to sort me out for commenting on the underperformance of the ACC in the fight against corruption.

This shows the impunity and arrogance that has come to characterize the ACC management. It is not different in any way from the daily threats many of us faced under the Patriotic Front (PF).

During the Bill 10 debate, I wrote a few articles criticizing the Bill and appeared as an expert witness in the Constitutional Court during the Bill 10 case.

PF officials reacted by threatening to burn me in my house at night. Why should Tom be allowed to behave like the lawless PF carders and threaten me for making independent and scholarly criticism of the underperformance of the ACC? What kind of impunity is that? Is it not our duty as citizens to hold those who hold public office accountable? Must we let elections degenerate into a game of trading one set of thieves for another while we remain silent?

What should the president do to revive ACC?

He must get rid of the current management of the ACC and bring on board people with a track record of fighting corruption and standing on the side of good governance.

The president must appoint someone beyond reproach, and has a history of dedication to the cause and not someone who simply wants to get a salary and accumulate travel allowances while neglecting her/his core duties.

3.Corruption Tainted settlements: The UPND government went to town denouncing the
former DPP under President Lungu’s tenure when it discovered that she had entered into
settlements immunizing some of the individuals accused of serious acts of corruption.

This partly explains why the government instituted her removal. Yet in less that three years, the ACC has entered in more scandalous settlements with some of the people accused of the most heinous acts of corruption.

The media has been reporting a shocking trend where the ACC simply asks suspects to return just a fraction of the loot and keep the rest while the suspect is given immunity from prosecution.

Using this mechanism, ACC is basically allowing both PF and UPND aligned officials facing serious accusations of corruption to buy off their freedom, using the same resources looted from the public.

As long as one is willing to give a cut, they
are let off. Are the people who think that ACC is now preoccupied with finding people with
big loot, immunize them and share the loot not justified? It is clear that the provision allowing the grant of immunity is being abused.

The president should facilitate the amendment of the immunity clause to narrow its use and infuse inbuilt safeguards against its abuse in order to protect public interest.

Beyond these short-term measures, there is need for serious institutional reform of ACC, to redesign its structures and professionalize its operations. In its current state it cannot be relied on to effectively fight sophisticated high-level corruption.

Doesn’t that explain why the ACC has done very little in relation to sophisticated transnational acts of corruption recently?

There is need to also focus on preventing corruption and fostering a culture of accountability by enacting a robust asset disclosure law to replace the current scattered and outdated pieces
of legislation.

To also get a national picture of the depth of the problem, the President should consider setting up a commission of inquiry to find out the depth of the problem.

The mandate of the commission should be broad and extend to both current and past corruption.

This will give the country an opportunity for stock taking and understanding of the depth of the challenge.

[The author is a law lecturer at the University of Zambia

Mahtani firm’s appeal to delay Court of Appeal ruling in Baobab Land case

0

Mahtani firm’s appeal to delay Court of Appeal ruling in Baobab Land case

By Mwebe Mbewa

Less than a month after missing a six-month deadline to file written arguments in the Baobab Land case, Lawyers for Mahtani-owned Kwikbuild Construction now want to appeal the decision of the Court of Appeal which refused to allow them to bring verbal submissions because this would have the effect of ambushing the appellant in that case, Jonathan Van Blerk.

By appealing the Court of Appeal ruling over their own failure to submit written Heads of Argument over a period of six months, Kwikbuild seems set to start a new process of legal technicalities to delay the pending outcome of Van Blerk’s appeal against the decision of High Court Judge Sharon Newa that he had not proved fraudulent misrepresentation in events surrounding compulsory acquisition of part of his land, Farm 4300, Lusaka, known as Baobab Land.

Simeza Sangwa and Associates, Lawyers for Kwikbuild Construction, which is known as an entity under the Mahtani Group of Companies, on 3 July, 2024 filed a Notice of Motion for an Order for leave to appeal the ruling of Appeal of 18th June, 2024, which threw out their attempt to ask to file written Heads of Arguments out of time, after squandering the scheduled 30 days, and also the five months period before the case came up in the Court of Appeal on 18 June, 2024.

An affidavit in support of this Notice of Motion, signed by Mandela Nkunika of Simeza Sangwa and Associates, recounts that on 18th June, 2024, Van Blerk’s lawyers raised issues including that Kwikbuild, not having filed Heads of Arguments, should not be allowed to participate in the appeal currently before the Court of Appeal.
“That the Court proceeded to deliver an Extempore Ruling wherein it agreed with the First Respondent (Van Blerk) that the Applicant (Kwikbuild) would not participate in the appeal…That the Court equally refused the Applicant (Kwikbuild) to file its application to file its extension of time and preceeded to hear the appeal”.

The Kwikbuild lawyers said their client now wants to appeal the Extempore Ruling on the grounds that the intended appeal raises a point of law of public importance and requires further arguing before the Supreme Court on whether a respondent who has not filed heads of arguments is proscribed from participating in the hearing of an appeal.

This exclusion arose at the 18 June, 2024 hearing of the Court of Appeal sitting of judges Catherine Makungu, Kelvin Muzenga and Yvonne Cheembe, during which one of Van Blerk’s Lawyers, Linus Eyaa, said his client filed Heads of Argument on 31st October, 2023, and that Kwikbuild and other respondents were due to file their own by 29th November, 2023. But the Attorney General, Kwikbuild Construction Limited, and Bantu Capital Corporation, owned by Mohamed Salama, failed to file in that period, and also in the five months up to the hearing day.

Kwikbuild and Bantu are two private companies which were allocated portions of Baobab land compulsorily acquired using the justification that it was to be given to the Lusaka City Council for it to build a housing estate complex and demarcate residential plots for civil servants and other needy residents of Lusaka. But the land was later given to these private companies for their own profit.

It was Eyaa who submitted that since these respondents had not filed their heads of arguments, the Court of Appeal should not give them audience in his client’s appeal, in line with the rules of the court.

Eyaa said Bantu Capital went to file after the 30 days, without seeking leave of the Court to file to file out of time, while Kwikbuild brought their documents to file at court on the day, intimating that they intended to file an application to file out of time. Only the National Pensions Scheme Authority (NAPSA) managed to file.

The Court of Appeal told Kwikbuild that they should have  made their formal application promptly. After submissions back and forth, the Court went into Chambers and made its Ruling after emerging.

In its Ruling, the Court of Appeal expunged from the record Bantu Capital Corporation Limited Heads of Arguments filed on 14th June, 2024, four days before hearing, and refused to allow Simeza Sangwa and Associates application to file for Kwikbuild out of time.

“As regards the submission that the respondents be allowed to make submissions Viva Voce, the effect is that this will result in ambushing the appellant and wasting of the Court’s time…We will proceed to hear the appeal,” the Court of Appeal ruled.

No doubt the Court of Appeal will have its say when it considers Kwikbuild’s Notice of Motion to appeal its own ruling to the Supreme Court. But outside court, there are some observations to be made about its context, and the conduct of the respondents over the prolonged period of litigation related to the compulsory acquisition of Baobab Land.

The first one is about the Court’s refusal to allow Kwikbuild and Bantu, the two private beneficiaries of the land the State compulsorily acquired, to file their heads of argument out of time.

Even the most charitable presiding officer in the whole judiciary would be bewildered by how these two companies, represented by State Counsels, Robert Simeza (Kwikbuild) and Sakwiba Sikota (Bantu), could neglect to file heads of arguments within the scheduled 30 days, and also in the lengthy interim between 29th November and 18th June.

Is it also not strange that apart from making their legal entreaties, the lawyers for these two companies offered no credible explanation for failure to file their clients’ heads of arguments within time. It seems logical then for the Court to have thrown out their intended applications to file out of time.

Common sense is also on the side of the Court of Appeal in its decision that allowing Kwikbuild, which failed to file written heads of arguments, to given their submissions viva voce would be ambushing the appellant, and would be a waste of the Court’s time.

The Court’s reluctance to have this respondent wasting its time should also be seen in the context of public alarm at how long this litigation has been allowed to take, and why.

The Court of Appeal must no doubt be aware of two observations made by the Supreme Court on this three-decades long delay, caused largely by the conduct of respondents, especially Kwikbuild Construction and Bantu Capital Corporation, the beneficiaries of the compulsorily acquired land.

In its Judgment of 17th May, 2021, the Supreme Court, sitting Justices Mumba Malila, Albert Wood and Jane Kabuka, stated the following:

“We should not lose sight that this matter started 33 years ago and that we do not expect litigants to have the patience of Job while waiting for their cases to move at glacial pace in our courts. In any event, public policy demands that the judicial process must be sensitive to, among other things, speed and reduced litigation costs. It is regrettable that this litigation has taken so long. While the respondents cannot be blamed for defending their clients’ rights by adopting the Stalingrad defence, they should accept some responsibility for  contributing to the uncertainty and delay in connection with this saga. They could have, for instance, realised that numerous authorities show that a judgment obtained by fraud or fraudulent misrepresentation can be set aside and that res judicata in such instances is not a defence and that the action was not time barred, on the documentary evidence. Arguments on these fairly straight forward legal issues expended unnecessary time, costs and energy.”

In plain language, what the Supreme Court said is that the respondents ignored well known authorities on several straight forward issues, and continued using making arguments on them, which simply helped to extend this litigation over 33 years.

This is why any hint that a respondent in this case is raising a tangential legal issue, over a matter caused by their own failure to submit documents on time, must be a source of alarm, not only to the Court of Appeal, but also to the appellant and citizens who have taken interest in the case because of its impact on the right to own land and other property, and the exercise of the proper use of the State’s power to compulsorily acquire land in the public interest.

That Van Blerk’s case had raised a point of law of public importance was the reason the Court of Appeal allowed it to go to the Supreme Court, leading up to the Apex Court’s judgment earlier quoted. The point is that the exercise of the State’s power of eminent domain should not to exercised willy nilly, without sound public interest or use justification, or strict compliance with legal provisions to simply deprive citizens of their land and other property.

The impact of this would extend to fettering the country’s land tenure system and create an unfavourable environment for promoting local and foreign investment in the Zambian economy.

When this case first came to the Court of Appeal, this Court exhibited its keen evaluation of facts and evidence, to the extent that the Supreme Court took special note, stating that its “record of what transpired leading up to the appeal are well captured in the Judgment of the Court of Appeal”.

It was also the Court of Appeal which first found that a judgment procured by fraud or fraudulent misrepresentation can be overturned, but this has to be done by a trial court. The Supreme Court concurred when it remitted the matter to the High Court for determination of the allegation of fraud, after making this observation:

“We must at this point state that if property is compulsorily acquired for a public purpose and it later turns out that it was not after all for a public purpose, that compulsory acquisition can be set aside and the property restored to the original owner.”

The determination to be made by the High Court was therefore, since the Attorney General  submitted to court that part of Baobab Land was compulsorily acquired for Lusaka City Council to build houses and give plots to civil servants and other residents, but then later allocated the same land to private entities for their own profit, was the public use justification not an a case of fraudulent misrepresentation?

High Court Judge Sharon Newa ruled that Van Blerk had not proved fraud, apparently ignoring all the observations and findings of the Supreme Court which could have guided her to a wholesome resolution.

This is the reason Van Blerk has appealed Judge Newa’s decision in the Court of Appeal advancing six grounds.

Ground number one is that Judge Newa misdirected herself in law and fact when she held that Van Blerk had not proved that there was fraud “while glossing over the admissions by the Attorney General and the Lusaka City Council that the land in question was later allocated to private companies”.

These admissions by the 1st and 2nd respondents are key proof of the action complained of, which was contrary to their submission during Van Blerk’s initial court challenge of the compulsory acquisition of his land.


Ground number two is that the trial Judge misdirected herself in law and fact when she held that the observations made by the Supreme Court in SCZ/8/03/2020, that where property is compulsorily acquired for a public purpose, but it later turns out that it was not after all for a public purpose, that compulsory acquisition can be set aside, and the property returned to the original owner, would only have been properly advanced had, in this matter, the contention that the judgment was fraudulently obtained succeeded, and the judgments of the High Court and the Supreme Court been set aside, and trial in cause number 1997/HP/272 been reopened.

This reasoning sounded like Judge Newa was actually shirking her responsibility to make the finding which was the reason the Supreme Court remitted the case to the trial court.

Ground number three is that the trial Judge misdirected herself in law and fact when linked the fact of Van Blerk engaging the Lusaka Council, to understand why part of his land was compulsorily acquired, and the determination of whether or not Fortune Kachamba’s testimony (for Attorney General) justifying the compulsory acquisition was false or fraudulent?

Ground number four is that the trial judge misdirected herself in law and fact when she held that ‘at the time the possible actualisation of the intention of the acquisition was in the process of being carried out, it had been delayed by Jonathan Van Blerk’s failure to surrender the certificate of title for marking off?’, when the Supreme Court Judgment in cause SZC/8/03/2020, had found the following:
“The respondents have advanced a rather interesting argument bordering on the alleged delay by the appellant in surrendering his title deeds to facilitate marking off and ultimately the implementation of the 1st and 2nd respondents’ reason for compulsory acquisition of land. On the face of it this seems to be an attractive argument but it is not. Once land is compulsorily acquired, a certificate of title means very little to the title holder. The developments that occurred clearly vindicate our view in this regard. As it turned out the 1st respondent did in the end transact over the property without securing the appellant’s title deeds to facilitate marking off.”

“Thus we find incredible the suggestion by the 1st respondent that the appellant’s own conduct was responsible for paralysing the 1st respondent’s efforts to actualise its intentions as stipulated in the compulsory acquisition notice. The 1st respondent had all the provisions of the law which it could have deployed to acquire the land. In any event, as we have pointed out and the respondent’s own evidence shows, the land was eventually subdivided without the appellant surrendering his title deeds.”

Judge Newa failed to absorb and benefit from this reasoning of the Apex Court.

In ground number five, the Appellant contends that the trial judge misdirected herself in law and fact when she held that the ‘claim that Fortune Kachamba’s testimony was fraudulent cannot stand’, without taking into account the admissions by the Attorney General and the Lusaka City Council that the land in question was later, allocated to private companies.

Ground six relates to the issue of costs which the Judge ruled should go to the respondents. The Appellant contends that she misdirected herself in doing so without considering the circumstances of the case before her.

Now that this case is before the Court of Appeal, it is everyone’s hope that all these key questions will be addressed. With the Kwikbuild’s notice of motion to appeal appears like an attempt to knock the Court off its stride.

Should Kwikbuild be joined by Bantu Capital Corporation in taking this route, it will be clear that some of the legal technicalities used to prolong this case over three decades are back in earnest, and questions could arise as to whether in the minds of legal practitioners there is a confluence between legal practice and morality.

If this costly legal merry go round is allowed, Zambian courts could become an object of ridicule as institutions for dispensing justice because they will be vastly eroded of the public’s confidence.

UNZA LECTURER DR O’BRIEN KAABA SAYS HE HAS BEEN THREATENED BY ACC BOSS

0

UNZA LECTURER SAYS HE HAS BEEN THREATENED BY ACC BOSS

Dr O’Brien Kaaba writes 👇

‘To demonstrate how bad the situation is, a few days ago, I wrote a one pager opinion in my individual academic capacity indicating why I thought the fight against corruption was crumbling. I never made any personal attack on anyone and focused my attention on institutional weaknesses. The morning after the article was published, the ACC Director General Tom Shamakamba called me through the phone of his deputy threatening to sort me out for commenting on the underperformance of the ACC in the fight against corruption.’

The strong anti-corruption fight President Hichilema launched when he ascended to office has ebbed off and lost traction. The institutions charged with fighting corruption are simply massaging, bandaging and covering up corruption. Isn’t it strange that ACC can make headline news for arresting and prosecuting a poor clinical officer for signing off two employment contracts while the ACC has done nothing about the more cases involving millions of dollars exposed in FIC reports? Why should the poor be prosecuted aggressively while the rich and powerful are let off the hook and given immunity (read “rewarded”). Just what has gone wrong? Here are my three (3) areas of vulnerability, which the President needs to urgently attend to if the fight has to be resuscitated, look credible and gain traction.

1.State Chambers are in the Forefront of Looting: State Chambers are in the forefront of cutting corrupt deals and facilitating corruption. This has put all law enforcement agencies in an awkward situation as state chambers ought to be an ally in fighting corruption. No serious crusade against corruption can yield fruits when the heart of the legal machinery for government is contaminated. The level of corruption is sickening, to the extent that state chambers are the ones looking for litigants to sue the government and pre-agree to settle or enter consent orders involving huge sums of money. The scheme has been perfected to the extent that some orders are now signed using judges outside Lusaka to avoid public scrutiny and media attention in Lusaka. The president needs to do two things: a) dismiss his senior legal advisors and b) either set up a commission of inquiry or authorize a special audit into all the high value payments authorized by state chambers in the last three years.

2.ACC is captured: It is a mistake to expect ACC to be an effective tool for fighting corruption in its current form. It is a captured institution. The forces that are ripping off the state resources through state chambers also have their stranglehold on ACC. It is no wonder the media has been reporting that the ACC management has simply cut off the board from decision making at the ACC. If the media reports are true, the ACC is not accountable to its board but to the same corrupt elements looting public resources. This suggests the capture is so complete and corruption reigns with impunity.

To demonstrate how bad the situation is, a few days ago, I wrote a one pager opinion in my individual academic capacity indicating why I thought the fight against corruption was crumbling. I never made any personal attack on anyone and focused my attention on institutional weaknesses. The morning after the article was published, the ACC Director General Tom Shamakamba called me through the phone of his deputy threatening to sort me out for commenting on the underperformance of the ACC in the fight against corruption. This shows the impunity and arrogance that has come to characterize the ACC management. It is not different in any way from the daily threats many of us faced under PF. During the Bill 10 debate, I wrote a few articles criticizing the Bill and appeared as an expert witness in the Constitutional Court during the Bill 10 case. PF officials reacted by threatening to burn me in my house at night. Why should Tom be allowed to behave like the lawless PF carders and threaten me for making independent and scholarly criticism of the underperformance of the ACC? What kind of impunity is that? Is it not our duty as citizens to hold those who hold public office accountable? Must we let elections degenerate into a game of trading one set of thieves for another while we remain silent?

What should the president do to revive ACC? He must get rid of the current management of the ACC and bring on board people with a track record of fighting corruption and standing on the side of good governance. The president must appoint someone beyond reproach, and has a history of dedication to the cause and not someone who simply wants to get a salary and accumulate travel allowances while neglecting her/his core duties.

3.Corruption Tainted Settlements: The UPND government went to town denouncing the former DPP under President Lungu’s tenure when it discovered that she had entered into settlements immunizing some of the individuals accused of serious acts of corruption. This partly explains why the government instituted her removal. Yet in less that three years, the ACC has entered in more scandalous settlements with some of the people accused of the most heinous acts of corruption. The media has been reporting a shocking trend where the ACC simply asks suspects to return just a fraction of the loot and keep the rest while the suspect is given immunity from prosecution. Using this mechanism, ACC is basically allowing both PF and UPND aligned officials facing serious accusations of corruption to buy off their freedom, using the same resources looted from the public. As long as one is willing to give a cut, they are let off. Are the people who think that ACC is now preoccupied with finding people with big loot, immunize them and share the loot not justified? It is clear that the provision allowing the grant of immunity is being abused. The president should facilitate the amendment of the immunity clause to narrow its use and infuse inbuilt safeguards against its abuse in order to protect public interest.

Beyond these short-term measures, there is need for serious institutional reform of ACC, to redesign its structures and professionalize its operations. In its current state it cannot be relied on to effectively fight sophisticated high-level corruption. Doesn’t that explain why the ACC has done very little in relation to sophisticated transnational acts of corruption recently? There is need to also focus on preventing corruption and fostering a culture of accountability by enacting a robust asset disclosure law to replace the current scattered and outdated pieces of legislation. To also get a national picture of the depth of the problem, the President should consider setting up a commission of inquiry to find out the depth of the problem. The mandate of the commission should be broad and extend to both current and past corruption. This will give the country an opportunity for stock taking and understanding of the depth of the challenge.

Dr. O’Brien Kaaba teaches constitutional law at the University of Zambia and is a senior research fellow at Saipar.

Is the Pastoral letter for the President or the people?- Amb. Emmanuel Mwamba

0

By Amb. Emmanuel Mwamba

Is the Pastoral letter for the President or the people?

In the Calendar of the Church and its social teaching, a Pastoral Statement or Letter is significant.

Pastoral letters may deal with any subject affecting the faith, practice, welfare, or worship of the people. They are often published during certain seasons, as in Lent or Advent. Over the centuries they have become expressions of the ordinary teaching authority of the Church.

This past week, the Zambia Conference of Catholic Bishops (ZCCB), a college of Catholic Archbishops and Bishops in Zambia met. As usual this would have culminated in a Pastoral Statement issued and read publicly.

Apparently, State House is said to have learnt of the stinging details of the letter especially on; the failure of government to resolve the economic crisis three years in a roll, the cost of living crisis, volatile exchange rate market, emerging dictatorial tendencies and shrinking democratic space, load-shedding, misconduct of the Police, Electoral Commission of Zambia, the expulsion of nine MPs and impending constituency by-elections, the matters surrounding the abduction of Petauke Central Independent Member of Parliament Emmanuel Banda and other pertinent matters affecting the people.

Another matter of concern was the confidential letters of apology to the Church over the misconduct of the Police in Kabwe and Ndola against the Church. The Bishops strongly felt that the President must make such apologies public as the matters were in public domain and also beyond the apology, dealt with his erring officers.

So before the Conference could issue the Pastoral Statement, State House is said to have stepped in and chose to honour a previous request for a meeting and insisted that the President Hakainde Hichilema would meet the Bishops and hear, listen and help resolve the concerns.

A hurried meeting was therefore arranged hours and prior to the release of the Statement.

President Hichilema invited Catholic members from his government led by Secretary to Cabinet, Patrick Kangwa and Defence Minister, Ambrose Lufuma, and others to join the meeting.

Efyo na Pastoral Letter yashima!

The Bishops have since headed to a sub-regional consultative meeting of the Catholic Bishops of Zambia, Malawi, and Zimbabwe taking place in Salima, Malawi, from 15 July to 19 July 2024.

This significant gathering aims to address various pressing challenges affecting the Church and the people within the three countries, including inequality, poverty, unemployment, cost of living crisis and environmental concerns.

HH and ECL, for both their own good, must meet, talk, smoke the peace pipe, unite; to make way for a new economic and political order in Zambia- Azwell Banda

0

HH and ECL, for both their own good, must meet, talk, smoke the peace pipe, unite; to make way for a new economic and political order in Zambia



By Azwell Banda,



Clearly, at the end of the road for his disastrous sponsorship of the Miles Sampa efforts to implode and destroy the Patriotic Front (PF) and Edgar Chagwa Lungu (ECL) himself, it appears Hakainde Hichilema (HH) now wants to change his strategies and tactics: he has signalled that he is willing to meet his opposition and even sit down and talk to Edgar Chagwa Lungu, apparently to make peace.

Many Zambians, some quite very well-meaning but still wrong, especially among those from our Christian community, have pleaded with Hichilema to forgive and move on, make peace with Edgar Chagwa Lungu, and urgently show “leadership” in attending to the many desperate needs of the majority of Zambians. Hichilema has stubbornly refused to do so, on both fronts.

Hakainde Hichilema has been singularly focused, in the past three years of his only reign, on delivering on his agreements with the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank, the US and its Western allies and all those who sustained his politics when he was in the opposition and funded his election victory in August 2021. Hakainde has not missed an opportunity to remind Zambians, now that he is in government, that they should expect relief in their suffering when he would have grown the Zambian economy. He has in fact boasted that his aim is to “double” Zambia’s economy (whatever the hell this means).

Rarely has a man and his group of friends dogmatically steeped in the now thoroughly discredited and discarded neo-liberal doctrines of the so called “Washington Consensus” ever walked the face of the earth, or ruled any country, such as are Hichilema and his zombies in his Cabinet. In the very short space of just three years, and thankfully the only term of office Zambians will ever allow him, Hichilema and his zombie Cabinet have, with reckless arrogance, pretended that they are “unleashing Zambians” upon a revolutionary road to make Zambia a right-wing free market economy, complete with the domination of “private investors” as the “drivers of economic growth and development” and “main creators” of employment.

Having recklessly subsidised the export of our strategic maize reserves, over-privatised electricity including through a reckless purchase programme from private electricity producers, electricity export drive and introduction of “cost reflective pricing” of electricity, “liberalised” and removed subsidies from fuels, chaotically begun to dismantle FISP – the government support programme to impoverished rural farmers, artificially pushed up the local price of maize by cruelly and without any thought to national incomes and employment levels, rewarded their international friends and themselves in the mining and other key economic sectors with government subsidies in the form of lowered or removed taxes, and many such anti-Zambia, unpatriotic and thoroughly anti-economic development measures, is Hichilema now slowly waking up to the horrors he has unleashed upon the majority of Zambians?

More than 700 Zambians have died from cholera, hundreds have been buried alive in unsafe, unlicenced and government unsupervised mines, more than nine million Zambians now struggle with hunger all the time while 6.6 million are actually starving, and facing famine. Mass unemployment continues to chock the lives of the majority of our population who are young people eager for work and who should be bustling with life. In this grim situation, the drought has simple compounded all the problems the majority of Zambians face.

It is true, as Fred M’membe of the Socialist Party says, Zambia’s economy has collapsed: ours is the perfect, most accurate definition of a “collapsed economy”. To be fair, this “collapse” has been long in the making – some whooping 33 years this year. The majority of Zambians have been pushed into our extremely impoverishing informal sector where they struggle to prevent death, every day. Today load shedding is wiping out thousands of such economic hustlers and survivors’ “businesses”. Water shortages make matters worse. For the majority of Zambians, their lives now are the next closest experience one can have, about hell.

Hichilema, his zombie Cabinet and his praise singers meanwhile have all the time over the past three years relentlessly touted, mocked, insulted, bullied, and used all kinds of racist filth to apparently “motivate” Zambians to become “capitalists”, “investors”, “hard workers”, “opportunity grabbers” and so on and so forth. Hichilema himself shamelessly praises himself and quite rudely says he “works hard”, he is not “lazy”, implying that the majority of Zambians are lazy, and this is why they are hungry, unemployed and poor, while he is rich. Is there some “softening” to this extremely offensive and thoroughly insulting attitude from a politician and his zombies who promised to solve the problems of the majority of Zambians by simply “fixing” their problems, lowering the cost of living and doing business, promoting democracy, human rights, rule of law and respect for our Constitution, none of which has happened?

Is sanity slowly dawning on Hichilema and he is beginning to smell, sense, feel, read and see the burning mass anger among the majority of Zambians his aborted election promises and his unleashing of pure hell on Zambians have caused? I hope so. Millions of Zambians are looking for signs of some sanity, humanity, some recognition, genuine sympathy, empathy and urgent political leadership from Hakainde and his zombie Cabinet, over their untold suffering which the UPND government’s fawning, ingratiating and quite moronic application of failed IMF and World Bank neoliberal policies have caused them.

It is pure insensitivity for the current plight of the majority of Zambians, extreme political arrogance and the daring of a politician and his zombie supporters too drunk on their feeling of power and impunity, extreme hubris, what Hichilema and the UPND government are doing, by unconstitutionally and criminally creating nine constituency by-elections which they know they can illegitimately “win”. Of course, Hichilema needs to assure his foreign business supporters and funders that he will stay in government long enough to mature his and their investments in Zambia. To achieve this, our Constitution, rule of law, democracy, parliament, the executive and many state institutions must be soiled and weakened. Hichilema has in fact quietly on several occasions said that it is “difficult” to “support democracy” on a poor economy. And yet all normal people know and understand that “Democracy” is in fact how power in society is managed all the time, but especially in bad, tough economic times, if society is not to explode in violence. Only proto-fascists treat their people as imbeciles, invalids, and therefore “recipients” of “government tolerated and allowed democracy” and government “permitted” human rights from their dictatorial governments. “Democracy” are the many sided assemblage of processes, institutions, regulations, rules, laws, constitutions and human behaviours to enable the management of human economic, social and political relationships in society, to avoid society eating itself up: “Democracy” is certainly not a “gift” especially from a cold, selfish and right wing unpatriotic capitalist such as Hichilema and his zombie Cabinet.

Hichilema and his zombie Cabinet must free MP Emanuel Jay Jay Banda and drop the fake charges they have saddled him with. They must allow the police to arrest his named abductors, try them and let “the law” take its course. Hakainde Hichilema must know they are playing with fire over the nine constituencies they have declared fake, unconstitutional and criminal vacancies. They must swallow their pride; leak their wounds now that their hope less, reckless and quite lunatic stooge, Miles Sampa, has gutted them by returning to his “natural home”, the real authoritarian and dictatorial PF. More importantly, Hichilema and his friends must not just speak carelessly about “no Zambian will die from hunger”: Hichilema’s UPND government must publish weekly updates of their countrywide work to get food to desperate Zambians. No sensible Zambian, not even honest members of the UPND, trust Hakainde Hichilema to tell the truth about our hunger situation: Hichilema has a problematic and tenuous relationship with the truth, all truth.

Hichilema must hurry, arrange to meet with all the opposition leaders, with the real Patriotic Front, and Edgar Chagwa Lungu himself: they must lower the political temperature in the country to prevent civil strife in which it will be the lives of young Zambians all of them have made their contributions to impoverish, lives which will be lost should civil war break out in Zambia. Hichilema and his opposition and Edgar Chagwa Lungu must in fact unite; they are the same apart from their tribal and regional support bases. This way they may clear the political scene in Zambia for long overdue new and superior political energies to energise.

Zambia has had enough of the rotten, costly, thoroughly backward and retarded politics from politicians such as Hichilema and his zombie Cabinet, Edgar Chagwa Lungu and his dictatorial PF with its one-party dictatorial state UNIP plagiarised constitution. The only way Zambia can avoid the looming bloody political disaster, is if HH and ECL meet, talk, smoke their peace pipe and unite, so that it becomes easier for Zambia to move past this crop of disastrously hopeless, destructive, lying, corrupt and undemocratic politicians.



Send comments to: banda.azwell@gmail.com

UNDERSTANDING THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS OF ZAMBIAN CITIZENS IN MICHELO CHIZOMBE’S CRITICISM ON EDGAR LUNGU’S ELIGIBILITY CASE

0

UNDERSTANDING THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS OF ZAMBIAN CITIZENS IN MICHELO CHIZOMBE’S CRITICISM ON EDGAR LUNGU’S ELIGIBILITY CASE

BY : Tobbius Hamunkoyo   13/07/2024

In Zambia, every citizen or resident has the constitutional right to initiate legal proceedings before any reasonable tribunal or competent court of law. No one can stop or blame you for this. This right is protected by the Zambian Constitution, ensuring that individuals can seek justice without being questioned or suspected regarding their associations or opinions.

Article 18(1) of the Zambian Constitution states as I quote: (If any person is charged with a criminal offence, then, unless the charge is withdrawn, the case shall be afforded a fair hearing within a reasonable time by an independent and impartial court established by law).

Michelo Chizombe has taken the matter of of the former President Edgar Lungu’s eligibility case to the Constitutional Court of Zambia. Edgar Lungu applied to have the matter dismissed, arguing it had already been determined. However, on July 9, 2024, the Constitutional Court dismissed Edgar Lungu’s application and allowed the case to proceed. It is Michelo Chizombe’s right to have his case heard and determined.

Further, Article 20(1)further provides, as I quote:  (Except with his own consent, no person shall be hindered in the enjoyment of his freedom of expression, that is to say, freedom to hold opinions without interference, freedom to receive ideas and information without interference, freedom to impart and communicate ideas and information without interference, whether the communication be to the public generally or to any person or class of persons)

These provisions guarantee that everyone in Zambia can access the legal system freely and without fear of retribution for their associations or opinions.

Given these constitutional protections, Michelo Chizombe , like any other citizen, should not be criticized for exercising his right to engage in legal processes. Criticizing Chizombe for asserting his constitutional rights undermines the principles of justice and fairness that the Zambian Constitution upholds.

In a Zambian democratic society, the legal system is a pillar of justice, and accessing it freely is a fundamental right. When individuals are discouraged or criticized for using this right, it threatens the integrity of the judicial process and the rule of law.

All citizens and residents of Zambia should recognize and respect the constitutional rights that allow each person to seek justice and express their opinions freely. Michelo Chizombe’s actions are protected by the Constitution, and he should not face criticism for exercising his legitimate rights. Upholding these principles ensures that Zambia remains a just and fair society for all.

The Legal and Historical Context Behind Former President Edgar Lungu’s Security Withdrawal

0

The Legal and Historical Context Behind Former President Edgar Lungu’s Security Withdrawal

By : Hamunkoyo Tobbius

The ongoing debate surrounding former President Edgar Lungu’s security situation has been clouded by misinformation and political maneuvering. It is essential to understand the legal and historical context to grasp why Lungu’s security has been withdrawn and why this decision is in accordance with Zambian law very important.

Under section 5(1) of the Benefits of Former Presidents Act, Cap 15 of the Laws of Zambia, former presidents are entitled to various benefits, including security. However, these benefits are contingent upon the former president refraining from active politics. This clause is critical in maintaining the neutrality and non-partisanship expected from former heads of state, ensuring they do not exploit their previous positions for political gain.

This is not the first time a former Zambian president has faced the withdrawal of benefits due to political re-engagement. In 2001, after his failed bid for a third term, President Fredrick Chiluba handpicked Levy Mwanawasa to run for president. Mwanawasa’s victory in the disputed election led to a unique political scenario where Chiluba, despite being a former president, continued to engage in active politics as the president of the Movement for Multi-Party Democracy (MMD).

This led to a significant legal challenge. UPND vice presidents Sakwiba Sikota then, Bob Sichinga, and Dipak Patel petitioned the High Court in 2002 to withdraw Chiluba’s retirement benefits. High Court Judge Anthony Nyangulu issued an interim order to suspend Chiluba’s benefits, highlighting the contravention of section 5(1) of Cap 15 due to his active political role. Chiluba eventually resigned from his position in the MMD to have his benefits reinstated, prioritizing his retirement perks over his political ambitions.

A similar situation occurred with Rupiah Banda, who, after being defeated by Michael Sata, contemplated a return to active politics. The Patriotic Front (PF) ministers warned Banda that such a move would jeopardize his retirement benefits, as it would violate the same legal provision. Banda wisely chose to remain in retirement, thus retaining his benefits.

In 2023, Edgar Lungu announced his return to active politics as the president of the Patriotic Front (PF), after initially retiring. This move, influenced by internal party dynamics and leadership challenges, directly contravened the legal stipulations of the Benefits of Former Presidents Act. Consequently, the current government, adhering to the law, withdrew Lungu’s benefits, including his security detail.

The assertion by some UKA/PF members that President Hakainde Hichilema and his government are personally withholding Edgar Lungu’s security is a not only a misrepresentation but misguiding the general public and Zambia at large. The withdrawal of benefits is a legal matter, not a political vendetta. The law clearly states that former presidents engaging in active politics forfeit their entitled benefits, a principle applied consistently in Zambia’s political history.

The situation with Edgar Lungu is not unique but rather a continuation of Zambia’s legal tradition to ensure that former presidents remain non-partisan. The cases of Fredrick Chiluba and Rupiah Banda set clear precedents. Lungu’s loss of security benefits is a consequence of his choice to re-enter politics, not an arbitrary decision by the current administration. Understanding and respecting the law is crucial in this matter, as it upholds the integrity and neutrality expected from former heads of state in Zambia.
These are benefits that a former President forfeits when back in active politics :

1. An office.
2. One personal secretary.
3. Three security persons.
4. Three cars, with free maintenance, and petrol entitlement to the extent determined by the
Cabinet, but only one car for the surviving spouse.


5. Three drivers, but only one for the surviving spouse.
6. One Administrative Assistant, who shall be at the level of Deputy Permanent Secretary.


7. Three house employees, which number may be increased by Cabinet.
8. A diplomatic passport for the former President and his spouse.


9. A furnished house built or bought in Zambia by the State at a place of the former President’s
choice and ownership of the house shall be transferred to him.
10. Medical insurance for the former President and his spouse.


11. In each year, one return air ticket for the former President and one for his spouse.
12. Funeral Expenses on his death.

Concerned Citizen,
Advocating top-notch Governance
, Legal learner, Lab Scientist , Public Speaker, Author, Rights & Positivity advocate

Power Exports, ZESCO and the proposed energy reforms by President Hichilema – Amb. Emmanuel Mwamba

0

By Amb. Emmanuel Mwamba

Power Exports, ZESCO and the proposed energy reforms by President Hichilema

…using the current energy crisis to implement neo-liberal and pro multinational corporation policies in the sector…

ZESCO is the predominant supplier of power to Botswana, contributing 48.8% electricity of the country’s current 410 megawatts imports.

Despite the country suffering the worst load-shedding crisis, ZESCO is unrelenting in its export of power to Namibia, Botswana and South Africa.

This is on top of the traditional export of power to Malawi and the Democratic Republic of Zambia.

President Hakainde Hichilema is pushing radical reforms of the sub-sector( without bothering recourse to Parliament).

He has forced changes that will significantly alter the status and standing of to the power utility-ZESCO.

He has hosted companies at State House from UAE, China, Qatar and others and literally forced ZESCO to sign power purchase agreements for the development of alternative energy source.

Following a Cabinet resolution , government announced the removal of transmission and distribution network infrastructure from ZESCO to be run by a separate entity. The details are unavailable about the structure and ownership of the new vehicle.

A similar decision in the 90s deprived ZCCM-IH of a valuable asset when Power Division , a company that managed transmission and distribution of power purchased from ZESCO through a bulk supplier agreement, was taken away and auctioned to the private sector. This company has since made billions of dollars over the last thirty years for it’s private owners.

Hichilema has introduced a policy called “Open Access” where the new transmission and distribution network infrastructure will carry power from independent power producers at a fee.

He is forcing public pension houses to invest in Maamba Collieries expansion. Maamba Collieries is investing in a $400million, 300 megwatts coal fired plant.

Due to green policies and climate concerns, Maamba Collieries, like other fossil fuel investments are facing significant challenges to secure financing and loans.

The cost to finance new fossil-fuel infrastructure, especially coal, is rising, while the cost for new renewables, the preferred and sustainable energy source, is falling fast.

Maamba Collieries is owned by a subsidiary of Nava Bharat (Singapore) Pte. Limited which holds a majority equity stake (65%). The balance equity is held by ZCCM Investments Holdings Plc (35%).

These measures are supposedly expected to spur investment in the electricity subsector.

He has forced the regulator, Energy Regulation Board (ERB) to approve the new changes.

We need to be concerned that President Hichilema is using the current energy crisis and the current desperation, to implement a long-term, neo-liberal and pro multinational corporation policy that will deprive ZESCO opportunities to serve and deliver power to Zambians at a reasonable price.

We want to win not because our opponents are despised but because we are understood, supported, and trusted- Fred M’membe

IT’S BUSINESS AS USUAL

We are not here to maintain the status quo, the system that has impoverished our people from the colonial days to date. We are here uproot it. We are here to make a revolution in which all our people – traditional, religious, business, and other leaders of our people – will participate.

In a process of revolutionary struggle, as in no other struggle, only the firm – those with true convictions and absolute loyalty – can stay in the ranks.

Realities do not arise in the world through someone’s whim. Revolutions, real revolutions, do not arise by the will of one person or one group. Revolutions are realities that obey other realities. Revolutions are remedies – bitter remedies, yes. But at times, revolution is the only remedy that can be applied to evils even more bitter.

In declaring our determination to struggle, we are as sincere as when we state that we are longing and striving to see our dreams for a more just, fair, and humane Zambia converted into reality.

No people will be abused, exploited, and humiliated if their spirit does not yield, if their will is not destroyed.

We are always alert and willing to struggle. Whatever may happen, whatever may befall us.

We will fulfil our promises to the masses of our people, and the people are loyal to those who are loyal to them. The people have faith in those who have faith in them.

We want to win not because our opponents are despised but because we are understood, supported, and trusted.

For us, there’s no choice between being principled and unelectable; and electable and unprincipled. We should win because of what we believe. We believe that the individual does best in a strong and decent community of people with principles and standards and common aims and values.

This can only be done together. Leaders lead, but in the end, the people govern.

Fred M’membe
President of the Socialist Party

I DEFINITELY LOOK TERRIBLE AND I CERTAINLY FEEL TERRIBLE, BUT I AM BETTER OFF HERE THAN IN JAIL – Chilufya Tayali

0

By Chilufya Tayali

I DEFINITELY LOOK TERRIBLE AND I CERTAINLY FEEL TERRIBLE, BUT I AM BETTER OFF HERE THAN IN JAIL

When bad people rule a Country, many people suffer, President Hichilema is not a good man which is why many of us are suffering within and outside Zambia.

I can’t give details of my challenges but I know one day, I will live to share with you, how I struggle with resources, physically and emotionally.

These pictures I take are just a reminder of the different feelings and challenges of a particular day.

However, I know many of you are also suffering, including the praise singers.

How many people can be happy with those long hours of load-shedding which is even affecting telephone networks, Radio and TV transmissions among other things.

Production has gone down, substantially, income has plummeted, making people struggle to buy the basics, which have increased in prices.

The Captains of industries have lost businesses while many others have been stamped with a seal of criminality denting their reputation, locally and internationally.

A gaslighting tendency of President Hichilema to cover up his failures, only him (HH) is a clean man who has made clean money, yet he struggles to explain how he amassed his wealth. He can’t even delay his wealth as required by the public office he holds.

Those who challenge him, by talking, are regarded as enemies of our Country and they are charged with heinous and capital crimes, to silence them.

It appears like we have no hope, even as we run away, leaving everything home, to come and live like we are nothing, without our families, but we will do our best to survive, otherwise, life naikosa.

I live one day at a time, yesterday is gone, we face today, tomorrow belongs to God.

TAYALI THE PUBLIC LAWYER OF THE PUBLIC COURT OF OPINIONS!!!

TAYALI THE MARRIED MAN – FAMILIES MUST COME FIRST!!!

Fight against corruption crumbling and needs urgent rescue, says Kaaba

0

By Ernest Chanda

CONSTITUTIONAL lawyer O’Brien Kaaba says the fight against corruption has collapsed because institutions tasked to fight the vice seem to have perpetuated it.
According to the 2023 FIC Money Laundering and Terrorism Financing Report, the institution detected K13.5 billion illicit transactions.


And President Hakainde Hichilema on Wednesday said he expected investigative wings to act on the report’s revelations.
But Dr Kaaba, who is ACC board member, wonders why corruption has continued even under the UPND which, while in opposition, promised to fight the vice.
“What the FIC report demonstrates is that serious acts of corruption of similar proportion to those committed under the PF regime are also happening under the leadership of the UPND government. That nothing has been done by ACC (Anti-Corruption Commission) and other law enforcement agencies suggests that the management of these institutions is either incompetent or is captured and sitting on serious cases of corruption,” he said in a statement.

“Either way, simply urging them to investigate cases thoroughly will likely yield nothing substantial. There is need for drastic action by the President at many levels. Urging action by law enforcement agencies is not enough. Some senior officers in government are operating with impunity and their acts of corruption are now public knowledge. Who has not heard of the serious allegations that the state chambers are a clearing house for corruption and money laundering deals? While under PF State House was the clearing house for corrupt deals, state chambers under the UPND government seem to have perfected that art.”
He expressed displeasure that state institutions are in the forefront making deals that undermine the fight against corruption.


“State House on 10 July 2024 issued a press statement in response to the FIC 2023 Money Laundering and Terrorism Financing Report in which the President is urging the Anti-Corruption Commission (ACC) and other law enforcement agencies to thoroughly investigate all the suspicious transactions raised in the report,” Dr Kaaba noted. “It is also clear that not only are institutions such as ACC not just sitting on cases (as the FIC Report clearly manifests) but that these institutions have been in the forefront of making some dirty deals that undermine the fight against corruption. Going by press reports, ACC, for example, has made legally senseless settlements immunising some of the most corrupt individuals, thereby shielding them from justice and accountability. The same corruption tainted immunity deals under PF are now being used under the current government in a manner that shows no commitment to fighting corruption.”


He urged President Hichilema to remove heads of institutions that are not fighting corruption.


“The fight against corruption, which started with great promise when President Hichilema took office, is slowly crumbling and needs urgent rescue. Under these circumstances, it is not enough to urge law enforcement agencies to investigate cases. Law enforcement agencies are part of the problem and part of the rot,” said Dr Kaaba.

“The President as the appointing authority must act to remove incompetent and corrupt heads of such institutions. He must also deeply look at his state chambers. There can be no serious fight against corruption if the state chambers are compromised. In the long term, the President needs to facilitate reform of the ACC and enact legislation supportive of a credible and professional fight against corruption, detached from vicissitudes of politics.”

Man Who Wanted To Be Reverend Father Becomes A Content Creator After Leaving Seminary School

A Nigerian man is now a content creator after he was unable to become a Catholic priest, which had always been his dream.

He said he was already in the seminary for training, but was asked to leave the school.

The man spoke in a short video chat which was posted on TikTok by Conversation With Marvel.

When asked why he was asked to leave the seminary, the man said he was not able to meet up in terms of academic intelligence.

He noted that before becoming a Catholic priest, one must be very intelligent to meet the rigorous training.

The young man has, however, become popular as a content creator on TikTok, where he said he enjoys making people laugh.

Watch the video below:

@conversationswithmarvel Can you believe this? 😭😂. The math is not math-ing @The Finest Boy On Tik Tok . . . . #conversationswithmarvel #s3thygr33n #reverendfather #catholic #nigeriancontentcreator #xyzbcafypシ #mrpio ♬ original sound – Conversations With Marvel

Reactions as man becomes content creator instead of priest
@Captain Joe Alfred said:

“Legendary Mr pio, the guy that made me love tiktok, with his shoulder dance.”
@Abuja/gwagwalada baker said:

“Mr pio said I no sabi book…we are together. I no sabi book.”
@Toriaofficial said:

“Mr pio go back to church abeg. We need more funny reverend fathered for Catholic Church abeg.”
@Benet Asuku said:

“Nobody wey no fit sabi book, na the commitment to study be the wahala.”
@PHARIZY said:

“No be lie, seminary school is for the extra brilliant… I was brilliant in primary school till I entered seminary sec school, I saw that I was not as brilliant as expected.”

Stocks mixed, dollar rises as traders weigh Trump shooting

0

Asian markets were mixed Monday as investors weigh the impact of the assassination attempt on Donald Trump with data suggesting it has boosted his chances of being re-elected president.

Eyes are also on a key meeting of China’s top leadership in Beijing, with hopes for measures to boost the world’s number two economy, which grew less than expected in the second quarter.

Investors struggled to extend the rally enjoyed on Wall Street, where all three main indexes ended on a positive note despite a forecast-topping read on US wholesale prices.

The figures were not enough to overshadow Thursday’s news that the consumer price index had slowed more than expected in June, which ramped up bets on a Federal Reserve interest rate cut in September.

That came after central bank chief Jerome Powell told lawmakers that inflation did not need to come in at decision-makers’ two percent target for them to begin lowering borrowing costs.

However, investors are keeping a close eye on developments in the United States after Trump was hit with a bullet on Saturday at a rally ahead of the Republican convention this week.

While the odds of him beating President Joe Biden had been rising in recent weeks, they got an extra lift from the shooting.

Observers said a Trump victory could see lower corporate taxes — a boost for companies’ bottom lines — but also an increase in tensions with China with fresh tariffs possible.

Still, Katrina Ell at Moody’s Analytics said: “The assassination attempt might lead to a temporary boost in the polls for Trump, but a lot can change before November.

“Financial markets are expected to soon refocus on the Federal Reserve and the growing likelihood of a rate cut in September.”

The dollar rose Monday, having softened last week owing to the prospect of lower rates, while equity markets were mixed.

Hong Kong, Shanghai, Seoul, Taipei and Jakarta dropped, while Sydney, Singapore, Manila and Wellington rose.

Official data showed the Chinese economy expanded just 4.7 percent in the second quarter, well below the 5.1 percent forecast in a survey by Bloomberg.

Separate data showed retail sales slowed sharply in June as the country’s army of consumers remain cautious.

The readings highlight the tough work leaders face as they grapple with a real estate debt crisis, weakening consumption, an ageing population and trade tensions with Western rivals.

President Xi Jinping and other top leaders are gathered in Beijing to hammer out plans to kickstart growth, though analysts warned there was unlikely to be any major announcement for the short-term.

“A Trump victory would be damaging for China’s economy given manufacturing and exports are powering the recovery,” Moody’s Ell added.

“Trump has indicated a number of significant trade barriers would be imposed on China under his leadership.”

Key figures around 0230 GMT
Hong Kong – Hang Seng Index: DOWN 0.9 percent at 18,123.67

Shanghai – Composite: DOWN 0.2 percent at 2,965.55

Tokyo – Nikkei 225: Closed for a holiday

Dollar/yen: UP at 158.04 yen from 157.88 yen on Friday

Euro/dollar: DOWN at $1.0889 from $1.0906

Pound/dollar: DOWN at $1.2966 from $1.2989

Euro/pound: DOWN at 83.95 pence from 83.97 pence

West Texas Intermediate: DOWN 0.5 percent at $81.80 per barrel

Brent North Sea Crude: DOWN 0.5 percent at $84.64 per barrel

New York – Dow: UP 0.6 percent at 40,000.90 (close)

London – FTSE 100: UP 0.4 percent at 8,252.91 (close)

PAY ATTENTION: Stay informed and follow us on Google News!

Source: AFP

Soyinka at 90: Five hidden facts you should know about Nigerian Nobel Prize winner

0

Professor Wole Soyinka has become a national asset and has reached the peak of his career since joining the academic world. He is a living legend who has been honoured and celebrated across the globe for his master craft and creativity.

He was popularly known for winning the Nobel Prize for literature, a testament to the extent to which his creative works cut across boundaries and were accepted in many cultures around the world.

Soyinka is popularly known for his activism and for winning the Nobel Prize in Literature in 1986.

On October 16, 1986, he was awarded the Nobel Prize in Literature for his work, which shows the struggle for freedom and the power of the human spirit from a wide cultural perspective and with poetic overtones. Soyinka was the first African to receive the prize.

Governor Babajide Sanwo-Olu of Lagos has described him as the biggest export Nigeria has ever produced to the world, congratulating him for his 90th birth on July 13.

There are other facts you should know about the Nobel Prize winner. Below are five important of them:

Is Wole Soyinka a musician?

The Nobel Prize winner has been described as a great composer who wrote the songs for most of his stage drama. He has two music albums, one of which was the popular “I Love My Country”, in which DJ Cuppy reproduced its chorus. His daughter-in-law and writer, Lọlá Shónẹ́yìn, while celebrating the 90th birthday of the global writer, extols his musical talent.

She wrote: “He’s best known for his activism and the Nobel Prize for Literature (1986), but Wole Soyinka is also an accomplished composer/ musician. He wrote the songs for his plays and wrote a two-track album which features the much-loved ‘I love my country’.”

See Shónẹ́yìn’s statement here:

He’s best known for his activism and the Nobel Prize for Literature (1986) but Wole Soyinka is also an accomplished composer/ musician. He wrote the songs for his plays, wrote a two-track album which features the much-loved ‘I love my country’. #WoleSoyinka90#GlobalGiant pic.twitter.com/R583jm8PiM— Lọlá Shónẹ́yìn (@lolashoneyin) July 12, 2024

He’s best known for his activism and the Nobel Prize for Literature (1986) but Wole Soyinka is also an accomplished composer/ musician. He wrote the songs for his plays, wrote a two-track album which features the much-loved ‘I love my country’. #WoleSoyinka90#GlobalGiant pic.twitter.com/R583jm8PiM

How many plays, poems, novels, others Soyinka wrote?

While he was known for his play across the globe, the Abeokuta-born literati published work cuts across all genres of literature as he had no less than 52 published works across all genres.

According to Open Country Magazine, Soyinka literature comprises 25 plays, 10 essay collections, seven poetry collections, five memoirs, three novels, and two translated works. (Publishers’ synopses appear in quotes).

The plays are The Invention (1957), The Swamp Dwellers (1958), A Quality of Violence (1959), The Lion and the Jewel (1959), The Trials of Brother Jero (1960), A Dance of the Forests (1960), My Father’s Burden (1960), The Strong Breed (1964), Before the Blackout (1964), Kongi’s Harvest (1964), The Detainee (1965), The Road (1965).

Other plays are The Bacchae of Euripides: A Communion Rite (1973), Camwood on the Leaves (1973), Jero’s Metamorphosis (1973), Death and the King’s Horseman (1975), Opera Wonyosi (1977), Requiem for a Futurologist (1983), A Play of Giants (1984), Childe Internationale (1987), From Zia with Love and A Scourge of Hyacinths (1992), The Beatification of Area Boy (1996), Document of Identity (1999), King Baabu (2001), Alápatà Àpáta: A Play for Yorubafonia, Class for Xenophiles (2011).

How many times was Soyinka jailed?

Wole Soyinka was jailed twice by the military government in Nigeria because of his activism. His experiences in prison significantly impacted his writing and political activism, and he has spoken out about the importance of freedom of expression and human rights.

In 1967-1969, Soyinka was arrested and jailed for 22 months during the Biafran Civil War for his vocal criticism of the Nigerian government’s handling of the conflict. He was detained in solitary confinement and subjected to harsh conditions.

Also, in 1994, the late General Sani Abacha arrested and jailed Soyinla for a short time for his activism and criticism of the government’s human rights abuses. He was later released and went into exile. President Bola Tinubu, in his epistle to the global giant on his 90th birthday, said Soyinka became the face of Nigeria’s political struggle for democracy because of his global stature. The president wrote:

“Our paths crossed during our just struggle for the enthronement of democracy in Nigeria following the annulment of the June 12, 1993, presidential election. When faced with a trial in absentia and a death sentence by the military regime at home, he galvanised opposition in exile through NALICON and NADECO. His global stature made him the face of our struggle to validate June 12 and restore democracy in Nigeria.” See the president’s tweet here:

I am pleased to join admirers around the world in celebrating the 90th birthday of Nigeria’s iconic son and the world-renowned Professor Akinwande Oluwole Babatunde, famously known as Wole Soyinka.

I am pleased to join admirers around the world in celebrating the 90th birthday of Nigeria’s iconic son and the world-renowned Professor Akinwande Oluwole Babatunde, famously known as Wole Soyinka.

Tomorrow, July 13th, will be the climax of the series of local and international… pic.twitter.com/pqAMYHVadF— Bola Ahmed Tinubu (@officialABAT) July 12, 2024

How many Universities employed Soyinka as a lecturer?

Wole Soyinka has been a lecturer at several universities throughout his career. Some of the universities that have employed him include the University of Ibadan, Nigeria (1960-1963); the University of Lagos, Nigeria (1963-1964); Cornell University, USA (1964-1966); and Harvard University, USA (1966-1967).

Others are the University of Cambridge, UK (1967-1968); the University of Ife (now Obafemi Awolowo University), Nigeria (1968-1972); the University of Lagos, Nigeria (1972-1984); University of Nevada, Las Vegas, USA (1984-1988); Loyola University, Chicago, USA (1988-1991); Harvard University, USA (1991-1992); Oxford University, UK (1992-1993); University of California, Los Angeles, USA (1994-1996); New York University, USA (1996-2003).

Soyinka has also held visiting professorships and lectureships at numerous other universities around the world.

Has Soyinka been honoured by the Nigerian government?

Despite his global presence and recognition, Nigerian governments have never honoured the literary icon until the administration of the immediate past President Muhammadu Buhari, who named the train station at Laderin in Abeokuta, the Ogun state capital, after the Nobel Prize winner. President Tinubu has also honoured Soyinka by renaming the Arterial Road N20 from Northern Parkway to Outer Northern Expressway (ONEX) in Abuja after him. He had also renamed the National Theatre after the professor.

Cadres teargas electoral officers, disrupt result announcement

0

Cadres teargas electoral officers, disrupt result announcement

By Edwin Mbulo in Livingstone

SUSPECTED political cadres on Saturday teargased election officials and stole election materials in Chirundu and Sikongo districts.

The Electoral Commission of Zambia (ECZ) has condemned the attacks on electoral officers during by-elections in Liumena and Njame wards of Sikongo and Chirundu districts respectively out of the nine ward by-elections conducted on Friday.

“Serious incidences occurred at the Machavika Primary School Polling Station, and later at Chiindi Primary School Polling Station which was also the Totaling Centre in Njame Ward. At Machavika Polling Station, suspected political cadres used pepper spray at the election officials at the Polling Station thereby disrupting the result
announcement process,” ECZ chief electoral officer Brown Kasaro said in a statement. “The cadres went away with two envelopes containing marked ballot papers. Fortunately, the Presiding Officer had the completed results compilation forms which were later used to complete the process.”

He said at Chilindi Primary School poling station which was also the totalling centre, cadres disrupted the compilation of poll results by going away with a record of proceedings.

Kasaro said fortunatey, the Commission had a
copy of the form.

“As a result of this violent disruption, the Commission was forced to suspend the proceedings at the Totaling Centre and all election materials were taken to Chirundu Police Station for safe custody. The results for Njame Ward have since been declared by the returning officer, at Chilindi Primary School at about 09:20 hours, today, Saturday, 13th July 2024. The police have since arrested some suspects and the Commission is keenly following the development of this matter,’’ said Kasaro. ‘’Further, in Sikongo District, another unfortunate incident occurred at Liumena Polling Station in Liumena Ward where some party officials and cadres stormed the Polling Station without accreditation. The officials and cadres insulted, intimidated and harassed not only election officials but also police officers on duty. The Commission strongly condemns these acts of violence, meant to disrupt the process, by cadres and officials. These incidences are unacceptable as they strike at the core of the management of the electoral process and undermine the integrity of elections, and they are also in breach of Sections 87, 89 and 94 of the Electoral Process Act 35 of 2016. Those who will be found to have committed serious offences wil be dealt with in accordance with the Electoral Code of Conduct and Electoral Process Act.”

Credit @The Mast

CHABINGA WINS AFRICAN ACHIEVERS AWARD, APPLAUDS HICHILEMA’S ECONOMIC ACTIONS

0

CHABINGA WINS AFRICAN ACHIEVERS AWARD, APPLAUDS HICHILEMA’S ECONOMIC ACTIONS

LEADER of Opposition and Mafinga Member of Parliament, Robbert Chabibga has urged fellow African leaders to prioritize unity, progress, and the well-being of all citizens if their Leadership is to bring about sustainable development, peace, and prosperity for generations to come.

He called for collaboration among African leaders, in order to create opportunities that birth economic impacts.

Chabinga was speaking during the award ceremony which took place yesterday at the House of Parliament, United Kingdom, which was held to honor individuals and organizations that have made significant contributions to the development and progress of Africa.

He however, dedicated the honor as a demonstration to the policies that have been implemented by President Hakainde Hichilema, during his three years of government.

“To save the economy, he has taken corrective action,” said Chabinga adding that prospective investors from the UK and throughout the world will have more punch as a result of the President’s strong push for an agricultural revolution and changes to the Mining and Energy initiatives.

Chabinga also pointed out implemented policies such as the expansion of the Constituency Development Fund (CDF), provision of free Education, and availability of the Social Cash Transfer facility, which has reached out to the most vulnerable in our communities.

“As a Leader of the Opposition Political Parties in Parliament, I wish to applaud President Hichilema for his progressive leadership which seeks to uplift the livelihoods of citizens especially the majority poor,” Chabinga said.

The law maker also took time to call for the need for investment in the areas of Mining, Tourism, Agriculture and Energy sectors which are aimed at improving the economy and benefit every citizen in Zambia.

“Further, I take this occasion to express my gratitude to Ms. Nelly Mutti, the Hon. Speaker of the National Assembly, for her help in advancing our cause,” he said.

He also thanked his family members, friends, colleagues and people of Mafinga for the wavering support, adding that such opportunities stand as inspiration for him to continue striving for excellence, and positive impact.

“This award is not just a recognition of my achievements, but also a testament to the collective efforts of our community, our country and our people. I am proud to be part of this community of achievers, and I look forward to continuing to make Zambia and Africa proud,” said Chabinga.

By Buumba Mwitumwa
Kalemba

STRENGTH OF UKA PUT TO TEST AS PF MOUNTS PRESSURE ON ECL TO BECOME ALLIANCE CANDIDATE

0

KBN TV EDITORIAL COMMENT: STRENGTH OF UKA PUT TO TEST AS PF MOUNTS PRESSURE ON ECL TO BECOME ALLIANCE CANDIDATE

We have listened to an audio recording doing rounds on social media involving an unmistakable voice of the Sixth Republican President, Edgar Lungu and another unrecognizable voice that sounds like one of his top party lieutenants. We think such an audio should not go without comment.

Firstly, we are of the view that such sensitive and strategic discussions to plan on how to influence broader decision making and securing alliance partners’ buy in shouldn’t be done on open lines. The risk of such discussions being recorded and going viral is very high as the case is and we don’t even know who recorded the conversation and later on leaked it.

Secondly, UKA is still very fragile and the parties must care to protect the unity within the alliance without making others feel undermined. While people are free to make suggestions on who should be the flag bearer, efforts should be focused on canvassing for support within the UKA Council of Presidents both individually and collectively. Ultimately, it’s the UKA Council of Presidents that should agree and announce their collective choice.

Listening to that phone conversation, ECL is very well aware of the wider implications and you could clearly tell he was being very cautious not to make his lieutenant feel dismissed.

What the audio has clearly revealed though is the immense pressure being heaped on him to become the UKA candidate, but he politely guided on what should be done to avoid being dragged into the controversy of self imposition.

We sympathize with ECL for the pressure he is having to put up with and yet he should still remain a tall figure to unite the opposition alliance in a democratically fractured nation.

It’s very hard to be ECL right now. He is just one man but he should be large enough to accommodate different views from his wife, his children, the Church, sponsors, sympathizers, party structures, and his colleagues within UKA.

As if that’s not complicated enough, he should also pay attention to what his lawyers are saying about his eligibility case currently active before the ConCourt.

No one wants to be in the shoes of ECL right now. While we sympathize with him, we are comforted to know that this kind of pressure comes with the territory of being a States Man and Father figure to the nation.

As a former head of state, ECL is more experienced than everyone whispering in his ears and he knows the burden on his shoulders is very heavy and he can’t be forced into making a rushed decision. We pray for him that beyond the many voices of men, he will hear the intimation of God in making that difficult choice.

We have said it before and we want to repeat it here that by far, ECL remains the most popular figure in UKA today by virtue of being a former head of state with strong connections to marshal financial support and a personal appeal to the masses.

He knows that as a father figure, those factors shouldn’t be the only consideration. There is a lot more at stake. National unity and stability weighs very heavily on his shoulders.

We take cognizant of the fact that willful failure by the UPND Government to implement its runaway populist campaign promises has made the electorate to start comparing and looking at ECL differently. That too, makes him attractive.

While the Council of Presidents want to convince themselves that ECL is one among peers, the reality is that ECL comes to the Council as a “Big Brother” with the financial muscle and party machinery to influence decisions even within UKA. However, PF should feel comfortable that they are well represented within the alliance and allow the Council of Presidents to determine the way forward.

It would appear that UKA itself is fearing to have a candid and open discussion about who they should collectively adopt as a candidate. The sooner they decide, the better for them and by so doing, they will forestall more speculative audio recordings such as the one we listened to today.

Therefore, outside of a consensus agreement within the UKA Council of Presidents, the ECL lieutenants heaping pressure on him to install himself as the chosen UKA candidate are being unfair to him and to the process.

If the UKA Council of Presidents makes a resolve to endorse ECL, let it be the preserve of the Council. That way, everyone will feel respected rather than made to feel like they are rubber stamping decisions made elsewhere.

We recall that ECL has on several accounts publicly said it could be him or anyone within the alliance. Unfortunately, his handlers have gone on a tangent to declare that ECL is UKA and UKA is ECL, disregarding the feelings of other UKA Presidents who should own the decision of who they want to choose among themselves.

We hope that the UKA Council of Presidents will remain resolved to unite and own the process of choosing one of them whether ECL or anyone else. We can only guide, Zambians will support your ultimate collective decision born out of brotherhood and national interest.

ZCCH-IH SHAREHOLDER MR. THIERY CHARLES IS A RACIST BIGOT, I ‘VE NO SHADOWY DEALINGS WITH THE COMPANY- Amos Chanda

0

ZCCH-IH SHAREHOLDER MR. THIERY CHARLES IS A RACIST BIGOT, I ‘VE NO SHADOWY DEALINGS WITH THE COMPANY

CAPE TOWN, (Sunday,14 July 2024) — Whilst I have been abroad, it has been brought to my attention that Mr. Thierry Charles, a French national introducing himself as a spokesperson of the ZCCM-IH Limited minority shareholders has written a letter to His Excellency Mr. Hakainde Hichilema, President of the Republic of Zambia, and simultaneously circulated it to the media alleging corruption against the president’s unnamed aides, but strangely he maliciously links me to the emergency of the alleged “bad eggs” at State House.

I resigned from State House on 19 June 2019, and I have had no links with it whatsoever ever since.
Notwithstanding whatever merits or a lack thereof, of any such sleaze being alleged by Mr. Charles against State House, I find it preposterous in the extreme, and brazenly malicious, for this infantile, seemingly self-righteous Frenchman to be making such unsubstantiated allegations expressly calculated to besmirch my reputation, and ostensibly fuel false narratives that I am, or was ever involved in graft and embezzlement against ZCCM-IH.

Just when one thinks the bizarre profiling and malicious lies can’t t get any worse, the bar of depravity just gets lower.

To imagine that Mr. Charles, an investor who is supposed to stay outside the local political spectre, can dedicate so much time and resources from the distant Paris, to deploy such abhorrent, nihilistic malice to slander an innocent person, explains in the main, the blinding chaos in Zambia’s political and corporate corridors.
How can it be normal that someone from the very far, comfy and cozy Paris, should summon such false entitlement to spew totally false allegations against me, and seek to prescribe how a Zambian president (whether present, past or future), should pick or unpick their aides?

I cannot rationalise this diabolical and pervasive attack from Mr. Charles, but given my two previous racist encounters with him, I can only assume he has returned to the pit of hell from where he lobbied me to help him in a bid to try and remove the ZCCM-IH chief executive officer (CEO), Dr. Pius Kasolo and replace him with a carefully head-hunted “white” CEO. I resisted then, and still would, any attempts to draw me into such disgustingly low places.

Throughout my public service, I have dedicated considerable effort towards building a fair and humane society and therefore my outright rejection of Mr. Charles’s lobby was in line with my almost reflexive outrage at any ethnic and racial profiling which I consider as repulsive base instincts pointedly at variance with common decency.

For him to have suggested in 2018 and 2019 that the replacement of Dr. Kasolo with a “white” CEO was the panacea to the challenges the company faced, was simply wrong and improper.

Dr Kasolo, like Mr. Francis Kaunda, and Mr. Edward Shamutete before him, represented some of Zambia’s best and brightest leading lights in the fields of mining and mineral economics. I was therefore horrified at Mr. Charles’s racist approach suggesting that ZCCM-IH woes, (as he put it) would end with the replacement of Dr Kasolo with an expatriate CEO.

I do not have any position on the substance of his assertions of the emergency of the alleged “bad eggs” at State House, but I still find it oddly off, the condescending nature of Mr. Charles’s letter to the President. Apart from the caustic content of his malicious cable, even its delivery was strange.

For Mr. Charles to allude to the emergence of “bad eggs” in President Hichilema’s State House, operating, as he alleges, in the shadows where I supposedly operated to make personal gains, is to suggest that he knows of those shadowy dealings then, and now, and perhaps that I was in fact coaching the current aides, none of whom he names, but paradoxically, he proceeds to name in the most reckless of ways, without any basis whatsoever.

During my tenure in State House, in addition to my core duties as special assistant for press and public relations, President Lungu also appointed me to a special committee tasked to develop a stable, fair and sustainable mining tax regime. Under this assignment I encountered many mining executives and investors. This is when I came across Mr. Charles, who, during some of those consultations, lobbied me to join what he described as progressive forces working on a plan to oust Dr. Kasolo from his post. On several occasions, other than this one, I informed Dr Kasolo of such plans because my conscious was not clear about such motives, especially this particular manoeuvre from Mr. Charles.

In 2018 at the French National Day cocktail in Lusaka, and at another occasion ahead of the 2019 Mining Indaba in Cape Town, Mr. Charles directly asked me to join the forces that were plotting to remove Dr. Kasolo and support the appointment of a new “white” CEO. This was particularly troubling for me because a similar representation, though mildly, had been made to me three months earlier by another cabal of investors with a relationship with ZCCM-IH.

Implicit in this absurd mention of me by Mr. Charles, is the suggestion that I could be nurturing the alleged “bad eggs” at State House; that I was, and, or is still involved in some unsavoury actions to defraud ZCCM-IH; and, or that I am inspiring these State House bad eggs (his euphemism for corrupt officials).

Strangely, Mr. Charles does not tell the President whether he has eaten any of these bad eggs or he just ended at smelling them. Nor does he name any of them, which makes his allegations more scurrilous and most extraordinary, particularly when it comers his scandalous mention of me.
Government, as I understand it, is supposed to be a place of high concentration of skill and talent. And my approach to public service therefore, has been that it is a privilege to serve and not a fountain of food and drink at the expenses of the majority poor. I did not take anything from ZCCM-IH at all, nor indeed from any government coffers, any single cent I did not work for.

It has been five years now since I left government, and I therefore invite the likes of the racist Charles to tender before any lawfully constituted tribunal any evidence of such misdeeds. To hide behind hate-filled letters to the President, fully packed with unjustified slander, represents the lowest form of human expression, especially when the same is coming from a stranger and about a stranger. I do not know Mr. Charles at all, save for those two encounters which occurred during my course of duty. Mr Charles’s flurry of embellished letters to the President must always contain facts, uncontrived truths, and not speculative conjectures which only feeds into Lusaka’s despicable rumour mills.

It should be possible for a person to be able to offer their public service, pass on the button to others, and when there is nothing shady about them, to simply let them disappear into the sun-set and thank them for their service to the nation.
That is not say anybody is above the law when legitimate questions need to be asked. But no one is beneath the law either.

To whistle-blow against unnamed serving presidential aides, but proceed to name former aides of the former president is simply diabolical, and very extraordinary indeed.

In this vein, Mr. Charles’s letter serves very minimal or no purpose at all, but simply advances the now entrenched vile culture of criminalising public service, consequently discouraging some of the cream of our society from joining government.

The seven years I put into government, are some of the best years of my public service. To the best of my abilities, I made some sacrifices that oftentimes went beyond the normal call of duty, as is my personal work ethic. I therefore reject Mr. Charles’s mischaracterisation of my public service as shadowy and self-serving. Without any iota of evidence on his part, this kind of mischief will have consequences in due course.

Where does this obnoxious lynch-mob incitement stop? It is such actions by cheap anti-graft masquerades like Mr. Charles which feeds the malicious individuals who plant false narratives before the law enforcement agencies who end up opening false lines of inquiries against innocent people. This is why I feel duty bound to reluctantly, but decisively respond in great detail, to this irresponsible and utterly disgusting attack from Mr. Charles, some self-styled moralist passing off as a Zambian patriot.

I, for one, can’t succumb to any form of oppression, particularly laced with racist undertones such as this one from Mr Charles. Given another chance, I would still resist any racist approaches against myself or any other person. If that means Mr. Charles, half decade later, returning to take revenge by thrusting me into the unnamed basket of the rotten eggs he has smelt at State House, I still will stand my ground that removing a Zambian chief executive expressly to give way to a white one, would be wrong and improper.

As I do not know the current communications protocols of State House, I can only hazard an educated guess that it should still be rude and extremely inappropriate, that anybody should purport to send an important letter to the President and simultaneously publish it in the world-wide media. It is such condescending behaviour that betrays the insidious motives of Mr. Charles and consequently undermines its content.

It is at this point that I seek an honest answer from the board and management of ZCCM-IH to confirm or dismiss Mr. Thierry Charles’s letter to President Hichilema as their collective position of the company, or that of some of its shareholders as stated by this rather prolific writer and self appointed moral guardian of the soul of ZCCM-IH.

In his arrogant posturing, Mr. Charles seems to forget that ZCCM-IH is our, (Zambia’s) ‘family silver’ and we care deeply about it, perhaps more than he does. In his role as spokesperson for ZCCM-IH minority shareholders, Mr. Charles must not masquerade as a charity worker. He is simply a full, cold-blooded agent of the profit-seeking international capital.
In the meantime, my lawyers have assumed conduct of this matter.
— Ends —
——————————————————————————————————————————————————————
ORIGINAL SIGNED AND AUTHORISED FOR PUBLICATION BY:

Amos Chanda
Issued this 13 July 2024 at Cape Town, South Africa.

THE MATTER BETWEEN THE PEOPLE (HATEMBOS) VS NAWAKWI, GATHERS PACE

THE MATTER BETWEEN THE PEOPLE (HATEMBOS) VS NAWAKWI, GATHERS PACE

Lusaka / 12.07.2024

TRAIL CONTINUES AS CROSS EXAMINATION IS DIRECTED TO PHELUNA HATEMBO (in this Session)

In the Lusaka Magistrate Court of Judge Amy MASOJA, between The PEOPLE (HATEMBOS) Vs Edith NAWAKWI in the ABDUCTION case, Trail continued on Thursday 11th and Friday 12th of July 2024 respectively.

HIGHLIGHTS OF PROCEEDINGS;

THURSDAY the 11th July, 2024;

📌 Pheluna HATEMBO – 65, is represented by State Prosecutors – Counsel SITALI and Counsel Angela NYERENDA…. whereas, Madam Edith NAWAKWI is represented by Counsel Chifumu BANDA.

📌 The INQUEST in Cross Examination between Edith NAWAKWI’s Advocate – Counsel Chifumu BANDA where he fed a whole lot of questions to the composed Pheluna HATEMBO.

📌 Edith NAWAKWI’s Advocate asked the Court to physically go to the Sites / Lodges where Pheluna HATEMBO and Milton HATEMBO allege having being held hostage by Edith NAWAKWI at the time.

📌 The aforesaid, being ZAMCOM and FATMOLS Lodges.

📌 Counsel BANDA however, added that Farm 1924 in Kalomo, be one of the exhibits to travel to…. Pheluna HATEMBO’s defense State Prosecutor – Mr SITALI outrightly objected.

📌 Counsel BANDA asked to view the Videos in the Court, where the HATEMBOS appeared in March / April 2021 highlighting that they fled and their hiding was for fear of the ruthless Edith NAWAKWI’s ill intentions including killing them.

📌 In the interest of justice and in the quest to establish the relevance in its EXACTNESS, the Court ruled in favour to avail the Videos and be run in Court.

📌 After an extensive Cross Examination, Court Adjourned for the following day for continued Trail and Cross Examination to Pheluna including visiting the Sites for physical viewing…. and that the Court begins from ZAMCOM Lodge the following day at 10:00hrs on Friday the 12th of July, 2024 respectively.

FRIDAY the 12th July, 2024;

📌 In the interest of justice, Judge – Amy MASOJA, Pheluna HATEMBO, Edith NAWAKWI, Counsel Chifumu BANDA, Mr SITALI, SPECIAL DUTIES Media, and other interested Parties met by appointment at ZAMCOM Lodge being one of the alleged Sites / Lodges the HATEMBOS forcefully got confined into, by Edith NAWAKWI.

📌 Cross Examination begins at ZAMCOM Lodge; Counsel Chifumu BANDA asks Pheluna HATEMBO to show the Court which Rooms she and his brother were put.

📌 Pheluna took and EMPHATICALLY showed the Court the Rooms at ZAMCOM Lodge.
She took the Court and emphatically pointed Room number 14 to have been her confinement while his brother Milton HATEMBO was in Room number 16, she charged.

📌 Further, after feeding Pheluna with a whole bunch of questions by Counsel BANDA, she was ALSO asked to show the Court where the abductors packed their vehicle on the Park-Lot.

📌 With the whole gumption, Pheluna took the Court and showed the Lot. It is Lot number 4 DIRECTLY facing the Lodge Exit.

📌 Thereafter, Court immediately guided to go to the next Site / Lodge – the FATMOLS Lodge.

📌 Further, after an extensive Inquest, Pheluna was asked to show the Court where the abductors packed their vehicle on the Park-Lot.

📌 Pheluna HATEMBO took the Court and showed the place… that was DIRECTLY on the Lodge Exit door.

📌 As asked, Pheluna HATEMBO AGAIN took and showed the Court the Rooms at FATMOLS Lodge.
She took the Court and affirmed Room number 126 to have been, in confinement.

📌 Consequently, the Court sat in FATMOLS Lodge Conference Hall to undertake further Inquest in Cross Examination directed to the constructed and fragmented Pheluna.

📌 The aforesaid, FATMOLS Lodge herein, is the Site the HATEMBOS indicate to have made it to escape from the confinement of vindictive Edith NAWAKWI, according to them.

📌 From thereon, the Court guided to go back to sit at the Magistrate Court 3, for continued Trial.

📌 While in Court 3, in the interest of Justice and fairness, The Court Adjourned and set the below Dates for continued Trial;
26th, 27th and 28th of August, 2024 at 10:30 respectively.

NB: TYPICAL VERBATIM PROCEEDINGS IN COURT WILL BE PUBLISHED SEPARATELY IN ANOTHER ARTICLE

©SPECIAL DUTIES Media

Alec Baldwin sheds tears after Judge dismisses charges against him

The involuntary manslaughter case against actor Alec Baldwin was dismissed in dramatic fashion on Friday, July 12 after the judge ruled that prosecutors did not properly turn over evidence to the defense.

The nearly three-year legal saga for Alec Baldwin in the fatal shooting of a cinematographer ended without a verdict but with tears of relief for the actor and a small coterie of family who had settled into a somber daily routine on wooden benches inside a windowless New Mexico courtroom at trial.

Baldwin’s attorneys had filed a motion to dismiss the case, arguing state investigators did not properly share with the defense that a man delivered a box of ammunition purportedly connected to the case to investigators.

Judge Mary Marlowe Sommer sent the jury home for the day and heard several hours of testimony about the alleged issue. At about 4 p.m. local time, she sided with the defense and dismissed the case with prejudice, meaning it cannot be brought again.

“Have a great weekend,” Judge Mary Marlowe Sommer said.

“The state’s discovery violation has injected a needless, incurable delay into the jury trial,” she said. “Dismissal with prejudice is warranted to ensure the integrity of the judicial system and the efficient administration of justice. Your motion to dismiss with prejudice is granted.”

Baldwin cried as the decision was announced, and he immediately hugged his wife Hilaria.

The decision came after a chaotic hearing Friday just a few days into Baldwin’s involuntary manslaughter trial related to the fatal shooting of cinematographer Halyna Hutchins on October 21, 2021, on the New Mexico set of the film “Rust.” Baldwin had pleaded not guilty and could have faced up to 18 months in prison.

Baldwin was practicing a “cross draw” pulling a gun from a holster on the opposite side of his body from his draw hand with a prop gun when it fired a live round, killing Hutchins and injuring director Joel Souza.

During opening statements on Wednesday, prosecutors alleged Baldwin violated the “cardinal rules of firearm safety” by pointing the prop gun at Hutchins and pulling the trigger.

However, Baldwin’s defense blamed the film’s armorer and the first assistant director jointly in charge of firearm safety on set for allowing a real bullet to be loaded into the prop gun and failing to make it safe before it reached Baldwin.

“This was an unspeakable tragedy, but Alec Baldwin committed no crime. He was an actor, acting, playing the role of Harlan Rust,” attorney Alex Spiro said. “These ‘cardinal rules’ are not cardinal rules on a movie set.”

This is the third criminal case related to the on-set shooting. In March, Hannah Gutierrez Reed, the armorer for “Rust,” was found guilty of involuntary manslaughter and sentenced to 18 months in prison.

Dave Halls, the assistant director, agreed to plead no contest to negligent use of a deadly weapon, the district attorney for New Mexico’s First Judicial District said. The terms of the deal included six months of probation and a suspended sentence, prosecutors said.

Former Vibe editor-in-chief, Danyel Smith has accused Sean “Diddy” Combs of threatening her life

0

Former Vibe editor-in-chief, Danyel Smith has accused Sean “Diddy” Combs of threatening her life over a 1997 cover dispute in a new first-person essay for the New York Times.

In a personal essay published in The New York Times Magazine on Friday, Smith wrote that in 1997, she selected Combs as the cover star for Vibe magazine’s December/January double issue.

According to Hollywood Reporter, the photos for the shoot were inspired by the poster for the 1978 Warren Beatty film Heaven Can Wait, featuring Combs in white angel wings. With a split run of the cover, each of the two would feature a different motif: “one with heavenly signifiers and another with hellish ones.”

Following the photo shoot, she recalled Combs requesting to see the covers. Given this was against the policy for the magazine, Smith said she denied his request. After she told him no, she heard that Combs “planned to come to our office and force us to show him what we’d chosen and to make us choose something else if he didn’t like what he saw.”

Smith was aware that in 1996, Combs was found guilty of criminal mischief for threatening a photographer for the New York Post with a gun, but she said that she also knew that she “had to have him on the cover.”

Fearing what Combs could do, Smith said that Vibe employees “put together a plan” to keep her safe in case Combs appeared at the office.

Smith alleged that Combs entered the office with two security guards one day and asked the receptionist “Where’s Danyel?” It was then that the employees, who had already been notified by the receptionist of Combs’ arrival, “shuttled” Smith from office to office, allowing her to narrowly escape in a taxi, with the paper proofs of the covers in hand.

The next day, she said that Combs called the office, alleging that he made a threat.

“He wanted to see the covers. I was still on message: It’s not what we do,” recalled Smith. “It was then that Combs told me, as I’ve retold hundreds of times over the years, that he would see me ‘dead in the trunk of a car.’ Not missing a beat, I told him he needed to take that threat back.”

When Smith threatened that she would call her lawyer if he didn’t “take back” his alleged threat, she claimed Combs told her, “I know where you are right now. Right on Lexington.” After Smith contacted her personal lawyer and legal action was threatened, she said Combs faxed over an apology two hours later.

However, shortly after the incident, the magazine’s servers were stolen from the office. The entire issue was saved on one of the servers, which prompted rumors that crew members from Combs’ label Bad Boy Entertainment had been involved in the theft.

The New York Times Magazine article comes amid Diddy’s mounting legal woes, sex trafficking probe, and sexual assault lawsuits.

UPND SCOOPS 8 OUT OF THE 9 BY ELECTIONS ACROSS THE COUNTRY

0

UPND SCOOPS 8 OUT OF THE 9 BY ELECTIONS ACROSS THE COUNTRY

Highlights from the media engagement held by Information and Media Minister and Chief Government Spokesperson Hon. Cornelius Mweetwa MP in Southern Province today.

✅ Thanked the electorate who participated in all the nine by-elections that took place yesterday 12th July, 2024 across the country In districts that include Kawambwa, Mufumbwe and Chirundu among others.

✅ The United Party for National Development(UPND) scooped 8 out of the 9 by-elections across the country.

✅ The by-elections are an endorsement of a vote of confidence in the leadership of President Hakainde Hichilema.

✅ The elections were peaceful and provided a conducive atmosphere for everyone who was voting.

✅ It can be concluded that the people of Zambia are happy with the many development programmes brought about by government such as the free education policy and the expansion of the Constituency Development Fund (CDF) among others.

CONCERNS RAISED BY THE HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION ON THE ARREST OF ZESCO PROTESTERS

✅ Human rights and the law must be respected, however, the law must be interpreted reasonably and judiciously.

✅ The law provides that one has to demonstrate when one’s complaint or concern is not heard, but in the case of Zesco, government has already engaged Zesco over the concerns of citizens on the load-shedding schedule.

✅ While Government recognizes, respects, upholds and defends the rights of citizens to peacefully assemble and demonstrate, they must be able to demonstrate on things that are reasonable and judicious.

✅ The question of load-shedding and the technicalities of the load-shedding schedule is an issue that through Government, Zesco has already heard and it is doing everything possible to ensure that the right things are done.

✅ Zesco has indicated that when it comes to switching on and off of their machines, there has to be a technical understanding that it may not be as we wish it should be .

✅ Contrary to the desire of some citizens who want power in intervals during the day, the machines have been designed to be running 24/7 and not to be switched on and off.

STATEMENT BY POLITICAL COMMENTATORS CLAIMING THAT PRESIDENT HAKAINDE HICHILEMA WANTS TO TURN THE COUNTRY INTO A ONE-PARTY STATE

✅ Government does not understand where these allegations are emanating from because the recent by-elections, almost four political parties contested.

✅ In a one-party state, the recent by-elections would not have taken place.

CONSOLIDATED FINAL RESULTS – 8/9 WARDS

1. Constituency – Ward
Nakonde – Mulao ward
UPND – 588
SP – 237
IND – 398
LM – 32
UPPZ – 19
Rej – 37
Total cast – 1,311

2. Nakonde – Luchinde
UPND – 674
IND – 195
SP – 122
UNIP – 130
LM – 86
UPPZ – 41
Rej – 08
Total Cast – 1,256

3. Sikongo – Liumena ward
UPND – 1,209
SP – 113
CF – 25
LM – 14

Rej : 17
Total Cast : 1,378

4. Choma – Mubula ward
UPND – 833
LM – 227
SP – 205
PF – 10

Total Cast : 1,275

5. Mufumbwe – Kaminzeke
UPND – 802
SP – 116
UPPZ – 15
PF – 5

Total Cast : 938

6. Sikongo – Mwenyi ward
UPND – 929
SP – 200

Total Cast : 1,129

7. Kawambwa – Lushiba
UPND – 648
IND – 308

Total Cast : 956

8. Kanchibiya – Chinama
UPND – 858
UPPZ – 370
SP – 292
CF – 271
PF – 46
LM – 16
IND – 14

Total Cast : 1,867

OVERALL TOTALS – 8/9 WARDS

1. UPND – 6,541
2. SP – 1,285
3. IND – 915
4. UPPZ – 445
5. LM – 375
6. CF – 296
7. PF – 61
8. UNIP – 130

(C) UPND MEDIA TEAM

US PROF URGES ZAMBIA TO TAKE LOW-SCALE ELECTION VIOLENCE SERIOUSLY

0

US PROF URGES ZAMBIA TO TAKE LOW-SCALE ELECTION VIOLENCE SERIOUSLY

Lusaka, Saturday (July 13, 2024)

Michigan State University’s Associate Professor Michael Wahman, has emphasized the significance of addressing low-scale election violence in Zambia.

The Political Scientist said this during the launch of his book ‘Controlling Territory, Controlling Voters; The Electoral Geography of African Campaign Violence’ at the Southern Africa Institute for Policy and Research (SAIPAR) in Lusaka.

“We asked, does election violence make you fearful of wearing party regalia? Does it make you fearful of discussing politics in public? Does it make you fearful of working in campaigns? To attend rallies or to vote? The results are really interesting,” he said.

He highlighted that while election violence in Zambia does not significantly suppress voter turnout, it does impact political participation by instilling fear and inhibiting open political discussions.

Prof. Wahman underscored the need to take low-scale election violence seriously, as it can still deter individuals from freely participating in elections, potentially compromising the depth of democracy in the nation.

“I think there are good reasons to take low-scale election violence seriously because if we look at the incentives for those who might want to perpetrate violence, I would argue that actually in many ways if you can get an outcome where people get afraid of participating in elections through low-scale election violence, that is much better than having to engage high scale violence. There are different kinds of costs that we often talk about in election violence literature. There are potential electoral costs where people might punish those who are known for election violence, there could be potential legal costs as elections could be nullified by the courts and in extreme cases like Kenya where some perpetrators were even sent to the Hague,” he said.

He also discussed the various costs associated with election violence, including electoral, legal, and international repercussions.

Prof. Wahman argued that keeping election violence at a relatively low level of severity minimizes such costs, making it an attractive strategy for those seeking to influence election outcomes through intimidation.

“With all these costs, I would argue that if you keep election violence at a fairly low level in terms of severity, the costs are minimal. In terms of legal costs, basically none. There are very few elections that have been nullified due to violence. If you look at Intercontinental costs, basically none. If you look at the Election Monitoring Reports as I did in this book, you see that monitors will talk about isolated events of violence, sporadic violence, and continuous violence, even though I would argue that it has been systematic violence though at a lower level of intensity,” he said.

Musokotwane borrowed $6.4 billion in 2023 but Lying About UPND’s Excessive Borrowing- Kasonde Mwenda

0

Musokotwane borrowed $6.4 billion in 2023 but Lying About UPND’s Excessive Borrowing

By Kasonde Mwenda C -EFF President

13th July 2024.

Contrary to their campaign promises, the UPND Government has turned out to be callous peddlers of falsehoods. They are lying about almost everything from the true state of the economy to the excessive debt they are incurring every day. According to the IMF, as captured by Statista, Zambia’s national debt increased by $6.4 billion USD (+33.42 percent) in 2023 compared to the previous year.

Consequently, the national debt reached a peak in 2023 at $25.5 billion USD. Notably, this debt has continuously increased over the past years. In 2021, when Hakainde Hichilema and his UPND Government took office, the Zambian debt stood at $19.4 billion USD. Yet, in just two years, it has ballooned to $25.5 billion USD.

Zambia’s Finance Minister, Dr. Situmbeko Musokotwane, has falsely claimed that Zambia’s external debt has only increased from $13.04 billion to $14.7 billion, while domestic debt has risen from K194 billion to K225 billion since the UPND took over in 2021. Consequently, the IMF’s projection of Zambia’s economic growth rate has been reduced from 4.7% to 2.3%, prompting the IMF to increase Zambia’s borrowing window from $1.3 billion USD to $1.7 billion USD.

Unfortunately, Mr. Hakainde Hichilema and Dr. Musokotwane have not presented any plan on how they intend to pay off this excessive debt. Instead, they are pushing this burden onto future generations, much like the previous PF regime did.

As the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF), we have a plan to redirect our country from being debt and aid dependent to becoming productive through maximizing our mineral and agricultural resource potential. We will achieve this by shifting ownership of resources to benefit local Zambians and ensuring that every geographic region has a viable industry maximizing its resource potential. Every district will have a factory and a mine.

We demand transparency and accountability. The UPND Government must uphold integrity and stop telling lies. The people of Zambia deserve better than deception and reckless borrowing. We call on all Zambians to hold the UPND Government accountable and to demand a sustainable and truthful approach to our nation’s finances.

Kasonde Mwenda C
President, Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF)

MADE IN ZAMBIA: AN INNOVATIVE FLOATING POWER GENERATION UNIT IMPRESSES THE ENGINEERING INSTITUTION OF ZAMBIA

0

MADE IN ZAMBIA: AN INNOVATIVE FLOATING POWER GENERATION UNIT IMPRESSES THE ENGINEERING INSTITUTION OF ZAMBIA

The Engineering Institution of Zambia (EIZ) recently explored a power generation portable unit called the Hydro Master, innovated by Heavy Duty Solutions Zambia in Makeni.

The Hydro Master power generation unit has technology that converts the velocity of moving surface water into electricity.

This cleverly designed unit, delivered by a floating hydro-kinetic turbine, holds promise for various sectors in commercial, residential, agricultural, tourism, hospitality, and mining.

In the wake of loadshedding, this innovation comes timely to cushion the power deficit the country is experiencing and enable continuation of business for small, medium and large enterprises.

Elaborating on the capabilities of the Hydro Master, Heavy Duty Solutions Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Brian Ngoma, said the unit harnesses energy from perennial flowing water bodies such as rivers, streams, canals, and backwater channels.

Mr. Ngoma said this is a first of its kind in Zambia and is locally manufactured and distributed by Heavy Duty Solutions Zambia Limited, ensuring short manufacturing lead times and consistent hydro-electricity supply, operating 24/7.

“The Hydro Master is designed to self-adjust to changes in water levels, offering a predictable and constant energy output. It can be customized to specifications ranging from 5kVA to 1000kVA, available in single-phase or three-phase power at 400W/240V,” he said.

He emphasized the benefits of the Hydro Master, which requires no dam or civil infrastructure works, easy installation and setup, and incurs no maintenance, servicing, or operating costs. Additionally, the unit is environmentally friendly.

EIZ President, Eng. Wesley Kaluba, along with Eng. Bernard Tembo, Chairperson of the Engineering Energy Committee and Eng. David Kamungu, Registrar and CEO of EIZ was part of the delegation that visited the Heavy Duty Solutions Zambia Limited.

Eng. Kaluba expressed his admiration for the innovation, highlighting its potential to address the country’s ongoing energy challenges.

He said the visit marks a step forward in exploring sustainable and innovative energy solutions in Zambia, showcasing the potential of local manufacturing and engineering expertise to contribute to the nation’s development.

Zambian Footprints

Musokotwane borrows!…he is the worst Finance Minister Zambia has ever had-

0

Musokotwane borrows!- Amb. Emmanuel Mwamba

…he is the worst Finance Minister Zambia has ever had….

Amb. Emmanuel Mwamba wrote;

When Dr. Situmbeko Musokotwane took over from Ngandu Magande in 2008. He found a foreign debt of $500,000 as Zambia has just had a debt write-off of its $ 7 billion foreign debt.

Musokotwane also found earnings of $600 million from the mining sector due to the windfall tax policy on copper.

Without convincing justification, he also sold ZAMTEL, a giant telecommunications and communication service provider. Zamtel is now a shell of itself when competing private sector entities have grown and made billions of dollars in the last ten years.

By 2011, the foreign debt shot to $ 2.8 billion, and earnings from the mining sector dropped to negligible levels as he had abolished the windfall tax policy.

Musokotwane was borrowing for everything for roads, stadiums, and the infamous mobile hospitals.

Ten years later in August 2021 when he returned as Minister of Finance, he found a foreign debt of $11.9billion borrowed over a period of ten years( infact $9.1 billion since he left it at $2.8billion in 2011).

He has racked up the foreign debt to $14.7billion and rising.

He also found a local debt of K136 billion, which has shot up to K236 billion.

This year alone, Musokotwane informed Parliament that he is borrowing $ 600 million to support the 2024 national budget.

He has also put out an international notice that he is seeking $900 million in grants and loans for disaster and emergency support towards Zambia’s food insecurity.

He has already extended the IMF Bail-out loan from $ 1.3 billion to $ 1.7 billion. He has sought IMF approval already, and the fund has disbursed $ 570 million towards his request in July 2024.

Checking the records from Ministry of Finance, from his speeches and the National Borrowings Plans tabled and approved in Parliament, Musokotwane has borrowed in excess of $6 billion and rising barely three years since his return to the Ministry.

He found earnings from the mining sector of $1.1 billion per year since 2019 due to the non-deductible mineral royalty tax policy.

The revenue from the mining sector has dropped significantly to barely $300 million a year due to partly the abolition of the policy.

Pinning their hopes on Musokotwane is the fastest pathway to UPND’s their exit.

But similarly, President Hakainde Hichilema believes in granting tax concessions and unjustified incentives to the mines.

His hopes are also anchored in the IMF and its liberal policies.

Look at the Mopani Deal.
Look at the KCM deal.
Look at the First Quantum Minerals deal.

It is documented and audited that FQM stole $2.5 billion from Kansanshi Copper and Gold Mines.

ZCCM-IH started both criminal and civil court processes to recover the money and punish the Directors.

Together, Hichilema and Musokotwane have abandoned the court processes and have not provided a pathway to recover the $2.5 billion.

ZCCM-IH shares in Kansanshi have been sold and converted to an annual royalty payment.

These careless and dangerous decsions have been made at the time that Copper has been predicted to rise and rise and rise.

Copper is currently trading at $10,000 per tonne.

The economy is in free fall, has a volatile exchange rate market, rising inflation rate and debt, is experiencing the worst electricity load-shedding, has the the worst cost of living crisis on a bed of legacy issues such as poverty, high unemployment rate, diseases and under development with no discernible solution in sight.

Pray for Zambia, Pray for its recovery, Pray for a loyal and patriotic leadership.

James Ndambo did not facilitate my meeting with Edgar Lungu- Miles Sampa

No businessman facilitated my meeting with ECL

By Miles B. Sampa, MP,
Patriotic Front-PF President

12th July 2024.

There have been online discussions surrounding this topic. It has been brought to my attention that individuals associated with the UPND occasionally share outdated images of me with prominent figures to maintain the relevance of current connections for their political advantage. Recent speculations within UPND circles implied that a meeting between myself and ECL was organized by James Ndambo.

However, I clarify that I facilitated the meeting myself, as I have previously done with other eminent individuals, without the need for a third party.
Despite differing political views, I strive to maintain peace with everyone.

Furthermore, there have been other misleading speculations within UPND regarding a photo shared by a UPND member showing my interaction with James Ndambo during my time as Governor of the City of Lusaka many years ago. Luckily, another Zambian Chanoda Ngwira has already reacted to it.

This incident has raised uncertainties as to whether the UPND animosity is directed towards me, ECL, or Mr Ndambo.
If however the focus is on Mr Ndambo, it is important to note that unjust targeting of him by UPND overlooks his supportive contributions, which may only become evident after their time in power.

Accusations of leveraging or seeking benefits from Mr Ndambo need to be reconsidered, especially when reflecting on the strategic partnerships he has fostered for the betterment of Zambia. Attempts by UPND members to distance Mr Ndambo from their party are misguided, as he values longstanding friendships beyond political affiliations and beyond tenure of office holders. Politicizing his contributions undermines the positive engagements he has facilitated for the Nation’s progress.

It is quite intriguing how a man, with an extensive history in Zambian business circles and philanthropic endeavours spanning over 30 years, has miraculously transitioned from a neutral figure, untouched by UNIP, MMD, and PF, only to being labelled as the sole enemy of UPND?
This transformation occurred after UPND pursued him Worldwide, practically begging for a share of his wealth to secure their path to power.

One would think common sense dictates that only PF would harbour any resentment towards him for aiding the party that displaced them from power, yet curiously, it appears that PF harbour no such grudge. Quite the plot twist, indeed!

In conclusion, it is essential to acknowledge collaborative efforts without politicizing or making baseless accusations. My willingness to engage with leaders from all political backgrounds stems from the belief in showing respect and love to all leaders. Meeting with different political figures does not imply endorsement or political alignment. Personal interactions should be viewed separately from political agendas.

Attached is the speculated picture and yet it is from 2019 when I was Mayor of Lusaka and discussed with him investing in the cold storage facilities at Lusaka’s Chibolya meat habtoor. He had agreed and it juts never happened. Red tape. So pic shared in some blog is not from this year or lasts but 2019.

Zikomo 🙏🏾
MBS12.07.2024

BISHOP MAMBO ADMONISHES PF

0

Press Statement

12th June, 2024

The continued use of humiliating language by the Patriotic Front leadership towards the Presidency is unfortunate and must cease immediately.

It is particularly disheartening to see President Hakainde Hichilema being portrayed as if he is begging for a meeting with former President Edgar Chagwa Lungu. We remind those who demean the President’s genuine effort to extend an olive branch that belittling such a positive gesture, especially one made in response to a request from the Church, is unfair.

The President expressed his willingness to meet Mr. Lungu in response to a request from Reverend Patson Banda of the Reformed Church of Zambia.

Reverend Banda mentioned that many people would be pleased to see the two leaders working together for the country’s betterment. The President had the liberty to decline this request, as he has no personal issues to resolve with Mr. Lungu. It is Mr. Lungu who has issues to address with the people of Zambia, who claim he betrayed their trust during his tenure. Mr. Lungu and some of his family members are accused of amassing unrealistic wealth and are under pressure to prove their innocence through established judicial processes.

Despite these issues, the President accepted the Church’s request out of goodwill and respect, hoping to foster national unity and peace. However, actions by the PF leadership, such as the display of the book titled “How to Deal With Idiots,” an innuendo understood to refer to the President, and remarks by Raphael Nakachinda suggesting that the Presidency can call for a meeting “just to sit umungulu (purposelessly),” are totally unacceptable. Such meetings, like the Church-led ones at the Cathedral of the Holy Cross during the reintroduction of multiparty democracy, had clear agendas. It is unfair to reduce the Presidency to such levels of impoliteness.

We call upon the Reformed Church of Zambia and Reverend Banda, in particular, to state their position on the humiliating language used by Mr. Lungu and his supporters, such as Mr. Nakachinda, towards the President, as they were the ones who called upon the President to meet the former President.

Failure by Reverend Banda to admonish this behaviour will be understood by some citizens as a setup against the Head of State. How else should we interpret it if Reverend Banda and the Reformed Church of Zambia do not see anything wrong with the disrespectful remarks made about the Head of State following their request for a meeting with Mr. Lungu?

Furthermore, it is the considered view of most citizens that the tensions claimed by the opposition are a figment of their imagination. The opposition should note that the tensions they perceive are not national but personal. Many politicians claiming national tension are those with cases before law enforcement agencies and courts of law. How do such personal issues become national?

We call upon law enforcement agencies and the judiciary to ensure the speedy disposal of cases before their institutions to bring these matters to their logical conclusions. Zambians are now enjoying political and fundamental freedoms that had shrunk under the PF regime.

Therefore, the Republican President’s willingness to meet his predecessor does not stem from an assumption of national tension at all but willingness to listen not only to Mr. Lungu but other opposition leaders as stated at the Reformed Church of Zambia event.

(Original copy signed)
BISHOP JOHN MAMBO
PRESIDENT

Without drought we were going to have the largest yield of crop, Hichilema

0

By Thomas Ngala

WITHOUT drought this year, we were going to have the largest yield of crop, claims President Hakainde Hichilema.

Addressing the Italian International Cooperation delegation at State House yesterday, he said farmers responded to the government’s appeal to plant more.

“Drought has taught us a lesson. Without drought this year we were going to have the largest yield of crop. Our farmers responded to our appeal to plant more. But the drought came which has caused food insecurity, which has caused number two energy insecurity. So we are looking at diversifying our energy mix as well as a strategic issue now because this climate change now is a national threat to many countries, including ourselves. So… we would like to deepen what we do together,” he said.

President Hichilema applauded Italy for pledging to inject US $320 million in the Lobito Corridor project.

“The Lobito corridor, your pledge of US $320 million is really appreciated. Because you, the three countries, we have Angola, Congo DR, Zambia are very deeply engraved in the Lobito corridor. That corridor will now create a connectivity in Africa from the Atlantic Ocean to the Indian Ocean because we will be able to connect our own rail line in this country, Copperbelt to Southern Province, but also connecting TAZARA rail line on to Dar es Salam,” he said. “Along it, it’s agriculture. Clearly, we want to make this corridor or these corridors economically reliable and strong. We can’t just apply the economic model around minerals. We have to apply the model around agriculture for input supply, for moving of outputs, for processing, for trade. In the economy here, in the region, in the continent and beyond. So we really would like to do a bit more with yourselves around this issue.”

He said Italy and Zambia have a long standing relationship.

“We got independence in 1964. Italy and Zambia started working together at that early stage. Many projects, the younger people may not know, that a lot of engineering projects in this country were done under the cooperation of Italy and Zambia. A number of bridges, a number of industries. If I am not mistaken, Indeni should be one of those. And to be honest again, in agriculture, in water, Italy and Zambia have been working together for many years. So that is the reason you should feel warm to be here. The other reason is that leaders of Zambia, the leaders of Italy, all the years, they have continued deepening our relationship and we as the leaders today are extremely happy to even do more together with yourselves,” said President Hichilema. “This is for many reasons timely, Italy’s own decision to work with Africa so that Africa is not left behind is really encouraging to us. And for us as a country, we wouldn’t have been happy if we were left out of that package of your initiatives…”