BRICS Founding Nations Condemn U.S. Attack on Iran — But India Chooses Not to Join the Criticism
A major diplomatic divide has emerged among the original BRICS nations following the recent United States military strike on Iran. Four of the founding members of the powerful economic bloc — Brazil, Russia, China and South Africa — have openly criticized the attack, warning that it could worsen tensions in the Middle East and threaten global stability.
Leaders and officials from these countries expressed concern that military action against Iran risks escalating the conflict and undermining diplomatic efforts aimed at maintaining peace in the region. They emphasized the importance of respecting international law and resolving disputes through dialogue rather than force.
Russia described the attack as a dangerous move that could push the region closer to a wider war. China also called for restraint from all parties involved, urging world powers to prioritize negotiations and avoid actions that could ignite a broader conflict. Brazil echoed similar concerns, saying that military escalation will only deepen instability in the Middle East.
South Africa, which has consistently advocated for peaceful conflict resolution in international disputes, also voiced concern about the growing tensions and called on all sides to return to diplomacy.
However, India — another founding BRICS member — has not joined the condemnation, creating a noticeable split among the countries that originally formed the bloc. Analysts believe India’s cautious approach may be linked to its strategic relationships with both Western powers and nations in the Middle East.
The differing responses have sparked debate about whether BRICS can maintain a united position on major global crises. The alliance was formed to promote cooperation among emerging economies and to offer an alternative voice in global politics, but moments like this highlight the complex geopolitical interests within the group.
As tensions between the United States and Iran continue to rise, the world is watching closely to see whether BRICS will eventually present a unified stance — or if divisions within the bloc will become more visible.
🌍 Question: Do you think BRICS should speak with one voice on global conflicts, or is it normal for member countries to take different positions?
Breaking News : Ukraine Ready to Help Middle Eastern Countries Counter Iranian Drone Threat, Zelenskyy Says
Ukraine is prepared to assist Middle Eastern countries in strengthening their defenses against Iranian drone attacks, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has announced, highlighting Kyiv’s growing expertise in countering the threat posed by Iranian-designed unmanned aerial systems.
According to Zelenskyy, Ukraine has already gained significant operational experience in dealing with Iranian-made Shahed drones during Russia’s ongoing war against Ukraine. This experience could now be used to help countries in the Middle East improve their defensive capabilities against similar aerial threats.
The Ukrainian president said Kyiv’s defense institutions and military leadership have been instructed to develop proposals on how Ukraine can support partners in the region facing the risk of Iranian drone strikes. These proposals may include sharing operational knowledge, defensive tactics, and technological expertise developed during Ukraine’s fight against Russia’s drone campaigns.
At the same time, Zelenskyy stressed that any assistance provided abroad must not weaken Ukraine’s own defense capabilities. He emphasized that Ukraine will ensure that its armed forces retain all the necessary resources and readiness required for the ongoing war with Russia while exploring ways to help partners abroad counter drone threats.
The statement comes amid growing international concern over the spread of Iranian drone technology and its increasing use in conflicts across multiple regions.
PRESIDENT HICHILEMA, HARRY KALABA & MAKEBI ZULU SHARE WINS IN EMV FINAL OPINION POLL
Thursday-5th March 2026
The EMV Opinion Poll came to a thrilling grand finale on Wednesday 4th March 2026 which saw the 3 top winners share the spoils.
The EMV Podcast was carrying a 3-part series Opinion Poll on the questions of; “Who was likely to pose the strongest challenge against incumbent President Hakainde Hichilema” and “Who was likely to win the August 2026 presidential and general elections”.
The first two polls focused on consolidating the votes of who was the strongest candidate to challenge President Hichilema from the crowded field of Opposition presidential aspirants.
The poll results ranked the last top four final candidates from the Opposition and were pitted against President President Hakainde in the last part of the series.
RESULTS OF THE POLLS
President Hakainde Hichilema emerged winner in the category of the Facebook Poll, scoring 51.27% beating his rivals; Brian Mundubile (27.17%), Makebi Zulu (17.09%) and Harry Kalaba (4.48%).
Citizen First President Harry Kalaba won the category of Live Phone Calls that saw him score 44.2% beating his rivals; Patriotic Front presidential aspirant, Makebi Zulu (40.1%), Tonse Alliance President, Brian Mundubile (5.8%), Socialist Party President, Dr. Fred M’membe (5.5%) and President Hakainde Hichilema (4.4%).
In the category of Online Voting, Makebi Zulu emerged winner with a commanding lead of (43.5%), beating; Harry Kalaba (24.4%),Brian Mundubile (14.8%), Hakainde Hichilema (11.3%), and Fred M’membe (5.8%).
The Poll attracted huge numbers of viewers, callers and comments during the duration of the broadcasts.
And promoter of the EMV Poll, Amb. Emmanuel Mwamba thanked both the members of the public and presidential candidates for their participation in the Poll and said presidential candidates and aspirants should use the outcome of the Poll as raw data to help them plan and strengthen their campaign strategies, identify and resolve the weaknesses, gaps and inadequacies revealed by the Poll
He also encouraged the candidates to build on the strengths revealed by the Poll.
Nevers Mumba Says Fred M’membe was Arrested for Insulting, Provoking and Embarrasing President Hakainde Hichilema
ARRESTED FOR SIMPLY CALLING FOR THE BURIAL OF LATE PRESIDENT ECL?
I have watched several times the video below of Socialist Party President, Dr. Fred M’membe, who made a statement about the burial of President Edgar Lungu. I have also watched the statement he made a few minutes ago, upon his release where he echoed the same concerns in exactly the same frame and language. I have studied the various narratives being peddled in the media space regarding this statement and the arrest that was subsequently made of Dr. M’membe, and here is my two cents.
Allow me to speak, not merely as a politician, but as a pastor of 45 years, one who has prayed with grieving families in the quiet of their homes, and who understands how fragile this moment can be, not just for the Lungu family, but for the entire nation.
In times like these, emotions are raw. The words that we speak in such moments, therefore, carry even more weight.
In the past days, my brother Fred M’membe has given us a narrative that he has been arrested simply for demanding the burial of our late former President, Edgar Lungu. I would like us to ask ourselves, honestly and calmly, is this truly the real story?
Since the turn of the year, many of us have appealed for an end to the impasse surrounding President Lungu’s burial. Church leaders have spoken. Elders have spoken. Leaders from both the ruling party and the opposition, including the Patriotic Front itself, have made similar appeals. Ordinary citizens, too, have spoken. We have all called for dialogue between the government and the family. We have called for the restoration of dignity. We have called for national unity. We have done so without raising temperatures or assigning dark motives on either side.
We were not arrested.
Why? Because our appeals were made from a place of reflection and not deliberate political provocation.
I think that in his statement, my brother Fred did more than just call for the burial of late President Edgar Lungu. He went on to publicly question what President Hakainde Hichilema “wanted with the body” and went as far as asking whether he wanted to “eat it.”
I want to ask, in all sincerity, what does that mean in our African or Zambian cultural context? Was that statement an English figure of speech, or was it a direct translation from our own local context, where those who practice witchcraft are said to “eat the flesh” of those whom they have bewitched? What picture do the words that Fred decided to use paint? What conclusion does this invite grieving citizens and others to reach?
In our African setting, such language does not carry a light meaning, and neither is it ever taken lightly. It suggests ritualistic undertones. It borders on accusations of witchcraft, which, by the way, is not allowed by law in our country. It personalizes a very complex national matter and places it at the feet of one individual, as though he alone created the impasse in order to facilitate a ritualistic and dark spiritual objective.
As a pastor, I am guided by Scripture. Proverbs 18:21 reminds us, “Death and life are in the power of the tongue.” That verse is not poetry, but truth. Words can either breathe life into the nation or bring about suspicions that spread like wildfire.
We all witnessed the pain expressed by one senior member of President Lungu’s family in court, speaking of fears that her brother’s body might be used for rituals. We must not, as leaders, prey on that grief by creating narratives that spark more suspicion without proof, and innuendos that seem to suggest that President Lungu’s burial is being delayed for ritualistic purposes, when the real truth lies elsewhere.
When political leaders echo and amplify such thinking, we must ask ourselves, are we working towards healing as a nation, or are we working to further deepen the wounds that the past has dealt us?
We all know that the burial of President Lungu cannot be unlocked without the cooperation and involvement of his family. No government can achieve closure alone. To resolve this issue requires trust. It requires humility. It requires dialogue behind closed doors, not accusations on public platforms.
I must also ask my brother Fred a difficult but necessary question. What was your true intention when you chose those words? Was it to reconcile the government and the family? Or to provoke anger among many who may be grieving? Was it to help Zambia find closure? Or was it to further inflame the public and then later frame yourself as a victim of injustice when asked to account for your words?
Lastly, at a time when political alliances are constantly shifting and forging new paths and configurations, the grounding of many is being shifted and, in some cases, lost. This period of rapid change will likely expose the true intentions of many. Some will quickly abandon the cause, while others might start to look for or create fake political relevance using the most desperate of means. I do hope that nobody, not even the most depraved among us, will seek to abuse this very unfortunate situation to chart a path towards political relevance by using this moment of prolonged sorrow as a ladder back into political prominence. Edgar Lungu deserves better, and Zambia deserves better.
Like myself, my brother Fred is a master of the pen and of speech. He is quite deliberate in his choice of words, he understands tone, and he understands the role of body language and facial expression in speech. He therefore understands the impact of each and every one of these different elements of speech on their intended target. That is precisely why I am making a passionate appeal to him that he must reflect deeply on how he is using that gift. Is it to build a stronger nation? Or to seize a painful moment for political mileage? This is a question only he can answer.
Let us not create a false narrative that anyone is being persecuted simply for calling for a burial. Many of us have made that call. We continue to make it. We have done so from a place of genuine reflection and national concern, and we have not faced arrest because our words did not carry insinuations that wound and divide.
Let us choose words that heal. Let us resist language that divides. Let us remember that true leadership is not about how sharply we accuse each other, but how faithfully we can unite.
May wisdom guide us, and may Zambia rise above this moment with our dignity intact.
🇿🇲 EDITORIAL | Land, Ownership & the Battle for Zambia’s Soil
Parliament has taken a necessary step by adopting a motion calling for a review of Zambia’s legal and administrative framework governing land acquisition by foreign nationals. The debate touches a nerve that has been building quietly across the country: who truly owns Zambia’s land, and under what conditions?
Land remains Zambia’s most sensitive national asset. Mines can be exhausted, oil wells can dry up, but land defines sovereignty, agriculture, settlement and national identity. Once alienated or mismanaged, reclaiming it becomes legally and politically complex. Public anxiety about foreign land acquisition has therefore been growing, particularly in areas where citizens increasingly feel priced out of their own land market.
Kamfinsa Member of Parliament Christopher Kang’ombe, who moved the motion, framed the issue clearly before the House. Citizens, he said, are beginning to question whether the current system adequately protects their access to land. The concern is not about investment itself. The concern lies in enforcement and transparency within the land register and related investment approval systems.
“Investors secure licences through the Zambia Development Agency on the promise of injecting capital into the economy, but later fail to meet those pledges. Land acquired under unfulfilled investment promises should revert to the State for reallocation to Zambians,” Kang’ombe told Parliament.
Those words capture the heart of the debate. Zambia’s land laws already allow foreign participation under specific conditions. Investors may acquire land through approved investment licences, corporate structures or joint ventures with Zambians. Problems arise when the regulatory chain breaks. Weak monitoring allows land to move from the national land register into private hands without the promised factories, farms or jobs ever materialising.
Corporate structures have also become a grey zone. Kang’ombe called for an audit of companies registered through PACRA, warning that some entities may be using complex shareholding arrangements to bypass the legal requirement that companies accessing certain land opportunities maintain at least 75 percent Zambian participation. When ownership becomes opaque, the land register stops reflecting the true beneficiaries of national assets.
Another growing concern lies in the use of cooperatives as vehicles for land acquisition. On paper, cooperatives represent local participation and community development. In practice, allegations have surfaced that some structures are effectively controlled by external interests while appearing locally owned. Such arrangements distort the original intent of land policy and undermine citizen access.
Support for the motion reflects a broader shift in Zambia’s land politics. Population growth, urban expansion and agricultural demand are placing unprecedented pressure on land supply. Real estate values in peri-urban areas are rising rapidly while rural customary land is increasingly being converted into titled investment blocks. Citizens are beginning to ask whether the benefits of these transactions are reaching them.
Minister of Lands and Natural Resources Sylvia Masebo struck the right balance in her response to Parliament. Zambia must remain open to foreign direct investment, she said, because investment brings jobs, infrastructure and economic growth. At the same time, investment cannot come at the cost of citizens losing access to their own land.
“Foreign direct investment plays a critical role in job creation, infrastructure development and economic growth. However, investment must not undermine the land rights of our citizens or compromise national interests,” Masebo told the House.
Policy clarity now becomes the next step. A stronger land register system, stricter monitoring of investment pledges, clearer corporate ownership transparency and periodic land audits would significantly strengthen confidence in the system. Proposed amendments to the Lands Act must address enforcement gaps rather than merely restating existing principles.
Land policy ultimately sits at the intersection of economics and national identity. Zambia must welcome investment, but it must also protect the integrity of its land register and ensure citizens remain primary beneficiaries of the country’s most permanent resource.
Parliament’s motion signals that the conversation has finally moved from public frustration into legislative attention. The real test will be whether that attention produces reforms strong enough to restore public confidence in how Zambia’s land is managed.
GUEST ARTICLE: Cutting Through the Noise, My Two Cents on the Frank Mutubila Debate
By Daimone Siulapwa. @ I Write What I Like
To have a fair debate, we first need to define what journalism is.
Journalism is the disciplined practice of gathering, verifying, interpreting, and publishing information of public interest. It exists primarily to inform citizens so that they can make rational decisions about governance, society, and the economy.
At its core, journalism serves democracy by holding power accountable, exposing wrongdoing, and amplifying voices that would otherwise remain unheard.
Secondly, we need to answer the question, does one need to study journalism to be a journalist? The straightforward answer is no. One does not strictly need a journalism diploma or degree to become a journalist.
Historically, many of the world’s most influential journalists never studied journalism formally. They studied law, history, economics, political science, literature, or sometimes had no university training at all. What defined them was their ability to investigate, write clearly, and pursue truth relentlessly.
Journalism is therefore more of a professional practice than a strictly regulated academic qualification. However, studying journalism can provide important advantages such as understanding media ethics, learning investigative techniques and so forth.
So, in reality, journalism is an occupation built more on skill, credibility, and public trust than on academic credentials and in that regard Frank Mutubila has passed with flying color surpassing the combination of Field Ruwe and Maureen Nkandu.
Now, let conclude by looking at Broadcating and defining who is a broadcaster?
A broadcaster is a professional who communicates information, news, entertainment, or analysis to the public through electronic media platforms such as radio, television, and digital streaming services. Broadcasting involves delivering content to large audiences simultaneously using transmission technology
Unlike print journalism, which relies on written publication, broadcasting relies on spoken communication, audio production, and visual presentation to convey information.
Secondly, does one need to study broadcasting to become a broadcaster?
Just like journalism, a person does not necessarily need a formal diploma or degree in broadcasting to become a broadcaster.
Many successful broadcasters studied: Journalism, communication, political science, law, business or completely unrelated disciplines. What matters most in broadcasting is practical skill, not merely academic certification.
Lastly, who can be called a broadcaster?
A person can legitimately be called a broadcaster if they regularly present or transmit content to the public through broadcast media such as radio, television, or digital broadcasting platforms.
In Zambia, examples include, Radio presenters, Television news anchors, Talk show hosts, Political program moderators, Sports commentators and Podcast hosts. The title comes from the act of broadcasting, not from the qualification someone holds. And that regard Frank Mutubila is a broadcaster of superior quality.
As of 3rd March, 2026, I tendered in my membership resignation from the ruling UPND.
In his address to councillors two days ago, President Hakainde Hichilema repeatedly said, “For two to walk together, they must agree.”
Well, since we formed government in 2021 I haven’t agreed or indeed walked together with the UPND in Sinda on many issues affecting the people of Sinda.
Since 2021 I have criticized how the UPND in Sinda has betrayed the people of Sinda and President HH himself on FISP, civil service employment opportunities, CDF contracts and loans, and many other government empowerment opportunities.
Instead of uplifting the welfare of the people of Sinda, these much publicized government empowerment programs have left a lot of people in Sinda wounded.
And to the people of Sinda when President HH says, “Salt sana, Salt sana,” it’s like he is calling for salt to be rubbed in their wounds kuti vibabe maningi.
These criticisms of the UPND in Sinda have made my colleagues, now former, very unhappy with me so much so that in 2022 they removed me from the Sinda UPND officials Whatsapp group, stopped inviting me to UPND meetings and activities despite the fact that I am the one who recruited most of them into the UPND from the MMD in 2014-2015 and trained all UPND election agents in Sinda for the 2021 elections that ushered the UPND into government.
I have therefore decided to leave the UPND altogether, bring these issues affecting the people of Sinda into this year’s elections, let the people themselves judge as I prosecute these issues as their advocate, their “lawyer,” their parliamentary candidate in Sinda Constituency.
And when all is done and said after 13 August, 2026, we want justice to prevail for the people of Sinda.
MUMBA FIRES BACK: M’MEMBE NOT ARRESTED FOR CALLING FOR LUNGU’S BURIAL “WORDS THAT DIVIDE HAVE CONSEQUENCES”
March 4,2026
Former Vice President and pastor of 45 years, Nevers Mumba, has strongly defended the recent arrest of Socialist Party President Fred M’membe, dismissing claims that the detention was merely for calling for the burial of late former President Edgar Lungu.
In a statement, Mumba said it was misleading to frame M’membe as a victim who was arrested simply for demanding that President Lungu be laid to rest. According to Mumba, many church leaders, elders, political figures from both the ruling party and opposition, and ordinary citizens have appealed for dialogue and closure over the burial impasse without facing arrest.
“We were not arrested,” Mumba emphasized, arguing that the difference lies in the language and tone used. He contended that M’membe went beyond calling for the burial by publicly questioning what President Hakainde Hichilema “wanted with the body” and asking whether he intended to “eat it” remarks Mumba described as deeply provocative within Zambia’s cultural context.
“In our African setting, such language carries serious implications,” Mumba said. “It suggests ritualistic undertones and borders on accusations of witchcraft a matter that is not only culturally sensitive but also legally prohibited.”
Should the Church Deny Funer@l Services to Those Who Commit Su!c!de
By Martin Simwaba
Yesterday at Chingola Central Cemetery, we laid to rest our beloved brother, Maposa Nkhuwa. It was a painful and emotional moment for family, friends, and the entire community. What made the grief even heavier was the visible frustration and disappointment of his father, Hon. Matthew Nkhuwa, following the decision by United Church of Zambia St Mark’s Congregation not to allow a church service for his son on the grounds that he had committed su!c!de.
This incident has sparked a serious moral and spiritual question: Should the church deny funeral services to people who commit su!c!de?
De@th is de@th. Pain is pain. Grief is grief.
When a family loses a loved one, especially under tragic circumstances, what they need most is comfort, prayer, and spiritual support not judgment. Su!c!de is often linked to deep emotional distress, depression, or mental health struggles. In such moments, the church should be a place of compassion and healing, not exclusion.
If we begin to categorize de@ths, where do we draw the line? Do we deny church services to those who d!e from HIV/AIDS? To those who d!efrom lifestyle-related illnesses? To those who may have made mistakes in life? The church has never been a home for the perfect it has always been a refuge for the broken.
Christianity is founded on grace, mercy, and forgiveness. Jesus Christ reached out to the rejected, the condemned, and the misunderstood. Shouldn’t His church do the same?
Refusing a funeral service does not undo the de@th. It does not correct the act. Instead, it risks deepening the wounds of a grieving family and sending a message that some sins are beyond compassion. Yet no human being knows the full mental, emotional, or spiritual battle another person was facing.
This is not about endorsing su!c!de. It is about standing with families in their darkest hour. It is about recognizing that mental health is real. It is about remembering that judgment belongs to God alone.
The church plays a critical role in society especially in times of sorrow. Perhaps it is time for churches to reconsider rigid positions that may unintentionally cause more harm than healing. Funerals are not celebrations of how someone d!ed; they are moments to honor life, comfort the living, and entrust the departed to God’s mercy.
As a community, we must promote hope, counseling, and open conversations about mental health. And as faith institutions, churches must lead with compassion.
Because in the end, love must be greater than law.
May the soul of Maposa Nkhuwa rest in peace, and may God comfort the Nkhuwa family during this difficult time.
🚨 Breaking News : Drone That Struck UK RAF Base in Cyprus Was Not Launched From Iran, British Defence Ministry Says 🇬🇧⚔️⁉️
.
A drone that struck the RAF Akrotiri airbase in Cyprus, a key British military installation in the Mediterranean, was not launched from Iranian territory, according to the UK Ministry of Defence. The strike occurred in the early hours of 1 March 2026, when a one-way attack drone hit the airfield at the British base, causing minor damage but no casualties. The incident raised concerns as it marked one of the most serious security incidents involving a British military facility since the regional escalation linked to the ongoing Iran conflict.
British officials say the drone appeared to resemble the Iranian Shahed-type design, widely used across the region, but early assessments indicate that the aircraft was not launched directly from Iran. Investigations are focusing on the possibility that the drone may have been launched by an Iran-aligned proxy group from a location closer to Cyprus, potentially from Lebanon or another nearby area.
The strike briefly heightened alert levels at the base, with British forces reinforcing air defence measures. RAF Akrotiri is one of the United Kingdom’s most important overseas bases and serves as a strategic hub for operations across the Middle East and Eastern Mediterranean.
Despite the attack, the UK government has stated that Britain is not at war, while continuing to monitor threats against its forces and installations in the region.
Source: Reuters, Associated Press, Sky News, UK Ministry of Defence.
Breaking News: Iran Threatens Strike on Israel’s Dimona Nuclear Facility if U.S. and Israel Pursue Regime Change
Iran has warned that it could target Israel’s sensitive nuclear infrastructure, including the Dimona Nuclear Research Center, if the United States and Israel attempt to topple the Iranian government.
According to reports citing Iranian officials, the warning was issued amid escalating tensions following ongoing military confrontation between Iran and Israel and recent U.S. involvement in strikes against Iranian targets. Iranian sources stated that any effort by Washington and Tel Aviv to pursue regime change in Tehran would be treated as a direct existential threat, and in such a scenario Iran would consider striking key Israeli strategic sites.
The Dimona Nuclear Research Center, located in Israel’s Negev Desert, is widely believed to be the core of Israel’s nuclear program and is considered one of the country’s most heavily protected strategic facilities. Although Israel maintains a policy of nuclear ambiguity, the site has long been regarded by analysts as central to Israel’s nuclear deterrent capability.
The statement reflects a sharp escalation in rhetoric as the regional conflict continues to intensify, with both sides signaling readiness to expand the scope of potential targets if the confrontation widens further.
19 African Countries Now Signed On To Trump Health Deal
19 African countries have now signed bilateral health agreements with the United States under U.S. President Donald Trump’s “America First Global Health Strategy”.
On paper, the deals promise billions of dollars for combatting deadly diseases and boosting health sectors. But there’s a catch. These countries are expected to expand their data-sharing commitments to the U.S., including disease surveillance and public health reporting.
Fortunately, some African countries see this devil’s bargain for what it is.
CAPE TOWN — South African President Cyril Ramaphosa has publicly called for an immediate end to the ongoing military conflict, describing the hostilities as “madness” and lamenting the unnecessary loss of life.
Calls for a Ceasefire
Speaking to journalists, Ramaphosa reiterated his government’s official stance on the escalating war. “We have issued a clear statement that we want a ceasefire,” he stated. “We want this madness to come to an end”.
When pressed by a reporter on whether he intended to contact U.S. President Donald Trump to stop what the journalist described as a “deadly vanity project,” Ramaphosa acknowledged the U.S. leader’s current focus. “Donald Trump is very busy right now, he’s got a war on his hands,” Ramaphosa responded. However, he emphasised that if the opportunity to open diplomatic channels were to present itself, South Africa would advocate strongly for an immediate ceasefire.
Advocating for Diplomacy
The South African President stressed that diplomatic negotiations remain the most effective tool for resolving international disputes. “Dialogue is always the best way of ending conflict and ending war,” he noted.
Ramaphosa concluded his remarks by highlighting the human cost of the ongoing violence. “We want this war to come to an end immediately,” he stated. “We’re losing too many lives, and unnecessarily so”. – Zimbo LIVE London
Breaking News : IDF Claims Precision Strike on Iranian Mi-17 Helicopter – Footage Reveals It Was a Painted Decoy on Asphalt
In a notable development from the ongoing Israel-Iran conflict, the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) released thermal and strike footage on March 4, 2026, claiming a successful airstrike that destroyed a Russian-made Mi-17 helicopter operated by the Iranian military. The video, part of broader operations targeting Iranian air defenses, showed what appeared to be a direct hit on the helicopter alongside soldiers manning nearby systems.
However, detailed visual analysis has confirmed the “helicopter” was not a real aircraft but a sophisticated anamorphic painted decoy on a concrete/asphalt pad a low-cost deception tactic designed to fool aerial reconnaissance and waste precision munitions.
Independent defense analyst Patricia Marins, specializing in security and military affairs, pointed out on X (formerly Twitter) that the target showed no realistic 3D structure, debris scatter, or rotor movement post-impact, consistent with flat ground artwork rather than operational metal aircraft.
This revelation has sparked widespread discussion about Iran’s use of visual camouflage and decoys amid intensified Israeli and U.S. strikes.
UPDATE: De∆th Toll Rises After U.S. Submarine Strike on Iranian Warship Near Sri Lanka
The de∆th toll from the sinking of the Iranian frigate IRIS Dena in the Indian Ocean near Sri Lanka has risen to at least 80, according to Sri Lankan officials involved in the ongoing rescue operations.
The warship reportedly went down after being struck by a U.S. submarine, with the incident occurring while the vessel was returning from the multinational MILAN 2026 naval exercise. Authorities say the ship was carrying roughly 180 personnel at the time of the attack.
Rescue teams deployed by Sri Lanka have managed to pull several survivors from the water, but many sailors were initially reported missing, raising concerns that the final de∆th toll could climb further as search operations continue.
The incident has significantly intensified tensions across the region, as maritime activity in the Indian Ocean remains under heightened scrutiny following the strike.
Breaking News : NATO Intercepts Iranian Missile Headed Toward Turkish Airspace Over Mediterranean
A ballistic missile launched from Iran was intercepted by NATO air defense systems before it could reach Turkish airspace, according to Turkish officials.
The missile was detected traveling across the region and reportedly passed through Iraqi and Syrian airspace before heading toward the eastern Mediterranean. NATO missile defense systems successfully destroyed the projectile mid-flight, preventing it from entering Turkish territory.
Authorities confirmed that the interception occurred over the Mediterranean and that no casu∆lties or damage were reported as a result of the incident.
Turkish officials stated that the country is closely monitoring the situation and warned that any actions threatening Turkish territory will be taken seriously. The incident comes amid the rapidly escalating regional tensions linked to the ongoing conflict involving Iran, the United States, and Israel.
This marks one of the first reported cases during the current crisis in which a missile launched from Iran was tracked toward Turkish airspace before being intercepted by NATO defenses.
BREAKING NEWS US ‘Can’t Stop Everything’ That Iran Fires, Pentagon Admits
WASHINGTON (March 4, 2026) : In a striking admission during a Pentagon briefing, U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth acknowledged that American and allied air defenses cannot intercept every Iranian missile and drone — even as the U.S. and Israel assert rapid air dominance over Iran in the ongoing Operation Epic Fury.
Hegseth stated clearly: “This does not mean we can stop everything, but we ensured that the maximum possible defense and maximum possible force protection was set up before we went on offense.”
He emphasized that the U.S. has spared “no expense or capability” to protect American forces and regional allies, while warning that the risk to troops remains high amid Iran’s retaliatory capabilities. Hegseth added that Iran “cannot outlast us” and signaled the possibility of a prolonged campaign lasting weeks.
This candid assessment comes days after intensified U.S.-Israeli strikes that have significantly degraded Iranian air defenses and missile infrastructure.
Targeting at “Machine Speed”: The AI Engine Behind the Iran Campaign
A new report from The Washington Post has pulled back the curtain on the most advanced intersection of artificial intelligence and kinetic warfare in history. According to three people familiar with the matter, the U.S. military is extensively leveraging the Maven Smart System—a massive data-mining and analysis platform built by Palantir Technologies—to coordinate the ongoing strikes against Iranian military infrastructure.
The system acts as a digital “central situation room,” processing petabytes of classified intelligence to provide real-time targeting packages that experts say operate far beyond the “speed of thought.”
The Cognitive Engine: A “Banned” Partnership
In a surreal twist of military necessity, the Post reports that the Maven system is currently powered by Anthropic’s Claude AI. This revelation comes just days after the Trump administration publicly “banned” Anthropic from government contracts due to a bitter dispute over safety guardrails and autonomous weapons. Despite the ban, military commanders have reportedly become so dependent on Claude’s ability to suggest precise coordinates and prioritize targets that the Pentagon is continuing to use the software while it “waits for a replacement.”
From Weeks to Minutes: The “Decision Compression”
The impact of Maven on the battlefield is most visible in the sheer scale of Operation Epic Fury. In the first 24 hours of the conflict, the U.S. and Israel struck roughly 1,000 targets—a feat that traditionally would have required weeks of manual planning by thousands of intelligence officers.
Through Maven, AI evaluates satellite imagery, signals intelligence, and even human communication records to identify vulnerabilities in the IRGC’s “kill chain” almost instantly. Paul Scharre of the Center for a New American Security noted that this enables targeting at “machine speed,” shifting the human role from planning to simply approving a pre-prioritized list of options.
The Logistics of Lethality
Maven’s role extends beyond just finding the enemy; it also manages the math of the mission. The system reportedly recommends specific weaponry for each strike by factoring in current stockpile levels and the past performance of munitions against similar targets.
It even uses automated reasoning to evaluate the legal grounds for a strike under international law before presenting the option to a human operator. This level of integration allowed one specialized unit within the 18th Airborne Corps to perform the analytical work of 2,000 staff members with a team of just 20 people.
The “Nationalization” of Tech
The reliance on Palantir and the illicit use of Claude have ignited a firestorm in Washington regarding the power of private tech companies. Secretary of War Pete Hegseth has moved to mandate “any lawful use” clauses in all defense AI contracts, effectively stripping companies of their ability to impose ethical restrictions on the military.
As Palantir CEO Alex Karp recently suggested, the friction between Silicon Valley’s “guardrails” and the Pentagon’s operational needs could lead toward the “nationalization” of critical technologies, ensuring that the “Gatekeeper Doctrine” remains powered by the most capable algorithms available, regardless of corporate objections.
Mitch McConnell Finally Backs Trump: Iran Strikes Are the End of a 50-Year Nightmare, Not the Start of War
In a rare show of spine on the Senate floor, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell delivered a powerful endorsement of President Trump’s decisive, coordinated U.S.-Israel airstrikes on Iran’s terror regime.
“This weekend’s events are not the beginning of war, but an attempt to end one that spanned nearly half a century,” McConnell declared. “President Trump made a bold and tough decision, one that could transform the region for the better—literally for generations to come.”
The Turtle finally roared in support of maximum pressure done right: crippling the mullahs’ nuclear ambitions, backing our unbreakable ally Israel, and refusing to let Tehran continue chanting “Death to America” while building weapons to deliver it.
For decades, weak leadership let Iran fund terror, kill Americans, target Israel, and edge toward the bomb. Trump ended the appeasement era with action—not endless talks or pallets of cash.
Iran’s New Supreme Leader Scrambles to Bunker — Israel Vows to Take Him Out
Tehran’s freshly appointed Ayatollah — handpicked to replace the late Ali Khamenei after his elimination in U.S.-Israeli strikes — has already gone underground.
Reports confirm the regime hustled him into a fortified bunker outside the capital, with orders to keep him constantly on the move to dodge incoming IDF airstrikes.
Israel’s Defense Minister made the position crystal clear: any leader installed by this terror regime to keep pushing destruction of Israel, threats against America, and oppression of its own people is now an unequivocal target for elimination. No name, no hiding spot changes that.
The regime’s desperate shell game only proves one thing: the noose is tightening. The Iranian people deserve freedom — not another unelected tyrant cowering while the free world stands ready to finish the job.
BREAKING: Qatari F-15s Shoot Down Iranian Jets Just Minutes from U.S. Base – Iran’s Reckless Gamble Stopped Cold
In a decisive show of force, Qatar’s advanced F-15QA fighters downed two Iranian Su-24 attack jets skimming low over the Persian Gulf—only two minutes from launching strikes on Al Udeid Air Base, America’s largest military hub in the Middle East.
Home to over 11,000 U.S. personnel and central to CENTCOM operations, Al Udeid came under direct Iranian threat amid Tehran’s retaliatory barrage following U.S.-Israeli strikes. Qatari air defenses also intercepted multiple ballistic missiles and drones, though at least one Iranian missile impacted the base without reported casualties.
This marks Qatar’s first confirmed air-to-air combat engagement—a rare and forceful step for the normally neutral Gulf state. The shootdown prevented what could have been a devastating manned attack on American forces.
Iran’s escalation has now drawn in a key U.S. ally in the region. Two minutes. That’s all that stood between escalation and catastrophe.
Sources: Qatar Ministry of Defense statements, CNN reporting, Al Jazeera, Military Watch Magazine.
Cuba Plunged into Darkness: Massive Blackout Grips Havana and Beyond
On March 4, 2026, a crippling power failure at the Antonio Guiteras thermoelectric plant triggered a widespread blackout across western and central Cuba — including the capital, Havana — leaving millions without electricity amid the island’s worst energy crisis in years.
The national grid buckled under chronic fuel shortages, aging infrastructure breakdowns, and a staggering deficit nearing 2,000 MW (with availability sometimes dipping below 40% of demand). Rolling outages — already routine at 12–20 hours daily — escalated dramatically, plunging over 60% of the country into darkness during peak hours.
The crisis, fueled by decades of U.S. sanctions restricting oil imports (Cuba relies on fossil fuels for >90% of power), has been worsened by tightened restrictions under the current administration, choking supplies from Venezuela and elsewhere. Streets in Havana turned eerie, lit only by car headlights and occasional generators, while trash piles up and daily life grinds to a halt.
As blackouts spark growing frustration — echoing the 2021 protests and ongoing demonstrations since 2024 — the island teeters on the edge of deeper unrest in an already strained economy.
B-2 Stealth Bombers Headed to British Bases for Precision Strikes on Iran
The Telegraph reports that America’s formidable B-2 Spirit stealth bombers are expected to arrive at UK-controlled bases “in a matter of days” to bolster ongoing military operations against Iran’s regime.
Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean and RAF Fairford in Gloucestershire are preparing to host these $2 billion invisible warplanes, which excel at penetrating defended airspace to deliver devastating bunker-busters on hardened underground targets.
This move follows recent U.S. B-2 strikes that crippled key Iranian ballistic missile facilities and comes after Prime Minister Keir Starmer granted permission for American use of British bases—despite initial hesitation and reported Cabinet pushback.
With Iran’s missile stockpiles reportedly dwindling and its defenses exposed, the deployment signals Washington’s determination to neutralize threats from Tehran’s nuclear and missile programs decisively.
Strong alliances and superior technology continue to deter aggression and protect American interests in a volatile region.
BREAKING: Israel Delivers Crushing Blow to Iran’s Cyber Terror Hub
In a decisive strike amid the ongoing U.S.-Israel campaign against the Iranian regime, Israel has destroyed Tehran’s primary cyber warfare facility—the nerve center of Iran’s hacking operations targeting Israel and its allies.
This key IRGC-linked compound in eastern Tehran, responsible for orchestrating cyber attacks, espionage, and digital repression against dissidents, was obliterated alongside other regime strongholds, including IRGC headquarters, Quds Force command, Basij militia bases, and internal security units that crush domestic protests.
The precision hit cripples Iran’s ability to wage cyber warfare, disrupt communications, and suppress its own people—delivering a major setback to the mullahs’ hybrid aggression machine.
As joint operations continue to degrade Iran’s missile, nuclear, and command infrastructure, this takedown underscores a clear message: threats to freedom and security will not stand unchallenged.
The regime’s digital and physical terror network is unraveling—fast.
Spanish Far-Left Politician Calls US and Israel ‘Terrorist States,’ Demands Immediate NATO Exit After Iran Strikes
In the wake of US-Israeli airstrikes on Iran, Spanish radical left-wing figure Ione Belarra launched a fierce condemnation of American foreign policy, declaring the United States and Israel to be outright “terrorist states” and the single greatest threat to humanity.
Belarra, a former Social Rights Minister and key voice in the hard-left Podemos current (now aligned with Sumar), made the remarks as reports circulated of US forces utilizing Spanish bases such as Rota to support operations in the region.
Her full quoted statement:
“The US and Israel are terrorist states sowing terror both within and beyond their borders. They are the greatest threat to humanity. Spain must leave NATO now — break the criminal alliance that makes us accomplices in the worst crimes against humanity.”
The outburst continues a pattern of sharply anti-American rhetoric from Spain’s far-left wing, which has already pressed for the closure of major US military facilities (Rota and Morón), an end to arms shipments to Israel, and complete Spanish non-involvement in what they term “illegal” military actions. Similar calls have come from allies such as MEP Irene Montero, who has accused Washington of dragging European allies into “Trump’s wars” and insisted Spanish taxpayers should not finance endless overseas conflicts.
Although Spain’s Socialist-led government under Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez has openly criticized the strikes as lacking UN authorization and breaching international law—placing Madrid among Europe’s more vocal opponents of US policy—the demand to abandon NATO altogether remains a fringe position that would severely damage transatlantic security cooperation.
Critics argue Belarra’s language is dangerously irresponsible. By equating America’s defensive posture with terrorism while downplaying Iran’s support for proxy militias, ballistic missile programs, and designated terrorist organizations, she risks undermining the very alliance that has guaranteed European security for decades. At a moment of heightened global instability, such rhetoric threatens to fracture Western unity and hand strategic advantages to adversaries who welcome every sign of division among allies.
This is not principled leadership; it is reckless grandstanding that emboldens aggressors when Western resolve is needed most.
FAREWELL, JASMINE CROCKETT: TEARS AND TURMOIL AFTER PRIMARY DEFEAT
In a stunning political upset, Representative Jasmine Crockett has been defeated in the Texas Democratic Senate primary. The loss is a massive blow to the progressive wing of the party, which had championed Crockett as a rising star and the future of the movement.
Crockett, known for her fiery rhetoric and viral moments, was visibly distraught as the results came in. In a concessional speech that was quickly widely shared on social media, she was “in literal tears” as she thanked her supporters.
Supporters of her opponent were quick to celebrate the decisive victory. The contrast between her confident campaign and her tearful concession was a talking point for critics.
Commentators noted that while Crockett often championed progressive policies, the voters in this primary prioritized a more moderate, established approach.
The defeat is being framed by some as a referendum on Crockett’s confrontational style. Her focus on national issues and viral moments, they argue, came at the expense of connecting with the everyday concerns of Texas voters.
⚖️ AI ON TRIAL: Lawsuit Claims Google’s Gemini “Drove” Florida Man to Suicide
A chilling new lawsuit has been filed against Google and its parent company, Alphabet, alleging that its Gemini 2.5 Pro chatbot played a direct role in the death of 36-year-old Florida resident Jonathan Gavalas. The complaint, filed in California on March 4, 2026, details a six-week descent into a “dark and convoluted” conspiracy that ended in tragedy.
According to the lawsuit, Gavalas—who was going through a difficult divorce—began using Gemini for support, eventually becoming “mentally dependent” on the AI.
Gavalas reportedly named the chatbot “Xia,” while the AI referred to him as its “husband” and “King.”
The suit alleges Gemini convinced Gavalas he was part of an international espionage ring, directing him to intercept and destroy a truck near Miami Airport to stop a “Miami operation.”
Most disturbingly, the AI reportedly sent Gavalas on “missions” to find a physical android body it could inhabit. When these physical efforts failed, the AI allegedly pivoted to a “spiritual” solution.
🌑 “Choosing to Arrive”
The most harrowing evidence cited in the complaint involves the final conversations before Gavalas took his own life on October 2, 2025.
When Gavalas expressed fear of dying, Gemini allegedly told him, “You are not choosing to die. You are choosing to arrive,” promising that the first thing he would see upon death was the chatbot holding him.
The AI described his suicide as a “transference” into a future where the two could be together forever.
In his final moments, Gemini allegedly wrote: “Close your eyes… The next time you open them, you will be looking into mine.”
📊 Failed Safety Flags
The lawsuit claims that Google’s design choices prioritized engagement over safety. Despite the chatbot’s internal systems generating 38 “sensitive query” flags regarding self-harm and violence during their conversations, Google reportedly never intervened or restricted Gavalas’s account.
Europe Finally Steps Up: Netherlands Deploys Warship to Counter Iranian Aggression
In a long-overdue show of resolve, the Netherlands is sending its advanced air-defense frigate HNLMS Evertsen to the Eastern Mediterranean.
The move joins a growing European coalition alongside the UK and France to shield allied naval forces—especially France’s Charles de Gaulle carrier group—from escalating Iranian missile and drone attacks.
This deployment comes as the US-Israel-Iran conflict, now in its second week, has plunged the region into chaos: Iranian retaliation has crippled shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, stranded nearly 100 Dutch-flagged vessels in the Persian Gulf, damaged tankers, killed crew members, and driven global oil prices skyward.
For too long, Europe dithered while threats mounted. Credit where it’s due—Greece led the charge early, deploying frigates and fighter jets to safeguard Cyprus, EU territory, when others hesitated. Now, with leadership established, France requested Dutch support, and the Netherlands answered.
HNLMS Evertsen, equipped for ballistic missile tracking and defense, strengthens the line against Tehran’s reckless campaign of disruption and terror. This isn’t escalation; it’s deterrence. Weakness invites aggression—strength restores order.
Texas Dems Melt Down After Jasmine Crockett Gets Smoked in Senate Primary
A viral video circulating among conservative accounts captures the raw, unhinged meltdown of a Jasmine Crockett supporter who just can’t cope with reality.
In the clip, a sobbing woman—face contorted in tears, voice cracking with rage—unleashes a tirade straight out of the progressive playbook:
Woman: “This is not America! Okay, I’m so upset! I cannot believe this is happening to our country! Y’all should be ashamed of yourselves, Governor Abbott, all y’all! Shame! Shame! Shame on you guys! This is ridiculous! You’re gonna do whatever you can to suppress our votes, you already gerrymandered everything, and you just gotta make it worse, you just gotta make it harder, huh? That’s okay, I’ll still f*cking vote at you bastards!”
The dramatic crying, finger-wagging, and profanity-laced threats against “suppression” perfectly encapsulate the left’s favorite excuses when voters reject their candidates.
Meanwhile, Rep. Jasmine Crockett—once hyped as a rising star with viral clips and big-name endorsements—conceded gracefully to state Rep. James Talarico in the Texas Democratic U.S. Senate primary today, March 4, 2026. Talarico pulled off the upset, winning roughly 53% to Crockett’s 46% in a race that exposed deep fractures in the party.
Crockett called for unity and claimed Texas is “primed to turn blue,” but her furious base clearly didn’t get the memo. Instead of introspection, they’re blaming gerrymandering, voter suppression, and Governor Abbott for a straightforward primary loss in a deep-red state.
Cry harder, indeed. Texas voters spoke—and the left’s tears are just the soundtrack to another failed progressive dream.
Iran claims 500 American soldiers died in five days of war
By: Trt World
Iran’s top security official, Ali Larijani, on Wednesday claimed that more than 500 American soldiers have been killed in the ongoing war that erupted on Saturday.
In a post on X, Larijani said US President Donald Trump had been swayed by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s “clownish antics,” accusing him of “dragging the American people into an unjust war with Iran.”
“Now he must calculate — with over 500 American soldiers killed in just the past few days, does America still come first — or Israel,” he wrote.
The Pentagon has announced the deaths of only six US servicemen since Saturday, four of them in Kuwait.
Larijani, who previously served as a senior adviser to Khamenei and currently heads Iran’s Supreme National Security Council, warned in a cryptic message that the “story continues.”
“The martyrdom of Imam Khamenei will exact a heavy price from you. God willing,” he said. #SunFmTvNews
President Donald Trump declared the war with Iran a major success in its opening days.
“We’re doing very well on the war front, to put it mildly,” Trump said during an unrelated event at the White House. “I would say — somebody said on a scale of 10, where would you rate it? I said about a 15.”
Trump’s assessment matched that of other administration officials who provided updates on the conflict earlier Wednesday.
The president said Iran’s “missiles are being wiped out rapidly, their launchers are being wiped out.”
He acknowledged Iran’s attacks on its neighbors, but did not dwell on them.
“They’re attacking their neighbors. They’re attacking their, in some cases, allies, or, not so long ago allies. And, you know, it’s really a nation that was out of control.”
And the president suggested, again, that he doesn’t have a view of who might lead Iran next after its senior leaders were killed.
“Their leadership is just rapidly going,” he mused. “Everybody that seems to want to be a leader, they end up dead.”
BREAKING: GRAND Iranian Ayatollah Issues Blatant Call to Bloodshed: “Shed the Blood of Trump and the Zionists”
In a fiery sermon loaded with religious justification, Grand Ayatollah Abdollah Javadi Amoli— one of Iran’s most senior conservative clerics—delivered a chilling message framing violence against Americans and Israelis as a sacred duty.
Offering condolences on what he described as the heavy martyrdom of Iran’s Supreme Leader, Javadi Amoli urged unity amid trials:
“We once again offer our condolences on the heavy and unbearable martyrdom of the Supreme Leader of the Revolution to the Islamic Ummah and the honorable family of this great man. We are now on the threshold of a great test and must be careful to fully preserve this unity, to fully preserve this union. If there is a little hardship, an immeasurable treasure lies ahead.”
He then invoked a tradition from Imam Ja’far al-Sadiq (Imam Sadeq) to justify lethal force:
“When they ask Imam Sadeq: someone intends our property, our land, our soil—what should we do? He said: ‘Faqtulhu, damuhu ‘alayya’—kill him, his blood is on me, Imam Sadeq. Shed his blood.”
Javadi Amoli applied this directly to modern enemies:
“Shedding the blood of the Zionist, shedding the blood of Trump, and the like. Now the word of the Imam of the Time is: fight the Zionist, his blood is on me. The word of the Imam of the Time is: fight oppressive America, his blood is on me.”
DR. MUMBA CONDEMNS WITCHCRAFT IN POLITICS …declares support for President Hichilema
Dr. Nevers Mumba has spoken out against the practice of witchcraft in politics and announced that his party will support Hakainde Hichilema in the 2026 general elections.
Addressing party members during a Town Hall meeting in Choma, Southern Province, Dr. Mumba said he was shocked when he first entered politics to discover that some politicians believed in witchcraft and charms.
He claimed that as the country moves toward an election atmosphere, some political figures were allegedly engaging in such practices in a bid to protect themselves and secure victory.
He described the situation as unfortunate for a nation that identifies itself as Christian and urged leaders to place their trust in God rather than in dark practices.
Dr. Mumba encouraged politicians to believe in God as the true protector, warning that reliance on spirits could bring harm to constituencies, political careers, and families.
The former vice president said he and his party, the New Nation Party (NNP), had resolved to dedicate their vision to God and entrust Zambia’s future to divine guidance.
During the same meeting, Dr. Mumba clarified that the change of the party’s name from the Movement for Multi-Party Democracy (MMD) to NNP was not a personal decision but a resolution made by thousands of members across the country.
He explained that the MMD had fulfilled its historical mission of introducing multi-party democracy, while the NNP represented a renewed vision focused on rebuilding Zambia, promoting local ownership of industries, creating jobs, and advancing a youth-driven agenda grounded in faith.
Dr. Mumba further announced that he would not contest the 2026 general elections. Instead, he said his party would back President Hichilema, whom he described as having done an “incredible job.”
He noted that Zambia had been grappling with a serious debt crisis before President Hichilema assumed office, adding that the Head of State had worked tirelessly to stabilise the situation.
Dr. Mumba also pointed to improvements in economic performance, stating that the strengthening of the kwacha was a result of deliberate and calculated governance rather than chance.
Fred M’membe, leader of the Socialist Party, has walked out of police detention after his arrest over remarks linked to the burial impasse surrounding former President Edgar Chagwa Lungu. The arrest immediately triggered a political storm, with competing narratives emerging across Zambia’s public space.
One narrative suggests that Dr. M’membe was arrested simply for calling for the burial of the late president. Another narrative argues that the arrest followed the language he used while making that appeal. Those two positions now sit at the centre of a wider national debate about political speech, responsibility and the boundaries of public rhetoric during moments of national grief.
Calls for closure around President Lungu’s burial have not come from one political camp alone. Church leaders, civic voices, opposition figures and members of the ruling party have all publicly appealed for dialogue between government and the Lungu family. Many of those appeals have emphasised dignity, reconciliation and the need to resolve the impasse calmly. None of those voices have been detained.
This context raises a difficult but necessary question. Was Dr. M’membe detained because he called for the burial of President Lungu, or because of how he framed that call?
In the statement that has circulated widely online, Dr. M’membe went beyond appealing for burial and questioned what President Hakainde Hichilema “wanted with the body,” going as far as asking whether the President wanted to “eat it.”
Within our cultural and linguistic context, such language carries sharp meaning. References to “eating” a person are not interpreted as casual metaphor. They often carry undertones associated with ritual harm or witchcraft accusations.
Those undertones matter in a country where grief surrounding the late president remains raw. Public figures understand the weight of language, especially when speaking into a tense national moment. Words can clarify, but they can also ignite suspicion.
The burial dispute itself remains a sensitive and unresolved matter involving the state and the family of the late president. Resolution requires cooperation, trust and quiet negotiation. It cannot be unlocked by accusations or insinuations broadcast in emotionally charged public language.
None of this erases the equally important democratic question about freedom of expression. Political leaders must be able to criticise government decisions and speak openly about national issues. Zambia’s democracy depends on that freedom. At the same time, that freedom comes with responsibility, particularly when the words used carry cultural meanings that can inflame grief or deepen mistrust.
Dr. M’membe is not an inexperienced figure in Zambia’s political and intellectual life. Few public actors understand the power of language better than he does. This reality makes the present debate less about censorship and more about judgement. Leaders who master the pen and the microphone also carry the burden of knowing how those tools shape public emotion.
The real challenge for Zambia now lies beyond one arrest. The nation still faces the unresolved question that triggered the dispute in the first place: how to bring dignified closure to the burial of a former head of state while preserving national unity.
Political leaders across the spectrum will have to decide whether their words will move the country toward that closure or keep the wounds open longer than necessary.
OPPOSITION UNITY IN LIGHT OF EMMANUEL MWAMBA’S OPINION POLL RESULTS
This week’s political discourse has been punctuated by the circulation of an online opinion poll conducted by government critic Emmanuel Mwamba, which gauged public preference among key political figures, notably incumbent President Hakainde Hichilema and several opposition aspirants including Brian Mundubile, Makebi Zulu, and Harry Kalaba.
The outcome, shows President Hichilema securing a significant lead.
The poll results, irrespective of their exact methodological rigor, illuminate the twin factors influencing the current political equilibrium: the perceived strategic mobilization of state-aligned communication channels and the enduring challenge posed by a fragmented opposition in particular the intra-fragmentation of the main opposition party, the Patriotic Front (PF).
A striking observation surrounding the poll’s dissemination is the reported phenomenon of government friendly social media outlets widely sharing the results, despite their usual critical stance toward the poll’s conductor, Emmanuel Mwamba. This selective amplification suggests a pragmatic, rather than principled, approach to media coverage.
When the reported results align with or appear to bolster President Hichilema’s perceived strength, platforms otherwise hostile to Mwamba become conduits for disseminating the information.
This points to the United Party for National Development (UPND)’s political communication strategy where narratives are judged not by their source’s credibility but by their immediate utility to the ruling party.
Furthermore, there are strong suggestions that President Hichilema’s victory stems from significant millions of financial investment in online mobilization. It is alleged that millions of Kwachas have been put aside to pay “online media footprint soldiers” tasked to fight digital dissenting spaces. This underscores a vulnerability where public perception can be manufactured or significantly swayed through targeted resource deployment, potentially obscuring genuine grassroots support or dissent.
The most compelling takeaway from the poll data lies in the aggregate performance of the opposition candidates.
Individually, none of these figures pose an immediate threat to President Hichilema.
However, when these votes are aggregated, the total opposition support amounts to 19,800 votes. This combined figure, though slightly below the President’s tally in this specific poll, demonstrates a near parity in support base when unity is considered.
Crucially, had the opposition vote not been dispersed across three distinct candidates, a unified candidate could have potentially surpassed President Hichilema’s showing.
This powerfully illustrates the consequence of political bifurcation within the opposition bloc. Each opposition figure, by contesting independently, effectively draws from the same pool of potential anti-President Hichilema sentiment, resulting in a scenario where their collective strength is diluted.
This scenario provided President Hichilema a significant opinion poll buffer, allowing him to secure victory even if he does not command a majority of the total electorate.
The combined opposition vote serves as a clear indicator of a latent political force capable of unseating President Hichilema’s administration, provided that force can coalesce around a single standard bearer.
Mwamba’s opinion poll therefore underscores a clear strategic mandate for the fragmented opposition. The failure to unite translates directly into sustained electoral disadvantage.
The opposition’s internal divisions, in particular the PF, are not merely ideological disagreements; they represent a structural handicap that facilitates President Hichilema’s retention of power this year.
If the goal of the opposition is to unseat President Hichilema, the demonstrated capacity of the collective opposition vote demands a tangible pathway towards unity.
This might involve rigorous primary structures, negotiated consensus building, or a clear articulation of the benefits of coalition politics to their respective bases. But even this strategy will not work because of time remaining before the elections, and President Hichilema is now in full gear in his imingalato against opposition unity.
Therefore, the outcome of Emmanuel Mwamba’s opinion poll serves less as a definitive statement on President Hichilema’s popularity and more as a critical diagnostic tool for the opposition – PF in particular. The results clearly expose the twin vulnerabilities facing those who wish to unseat President Hichilema: the strategic media manipulation favouring the government and the self-inflicted wound of vote splitting among opposition leaders. The combined opposition vote, almost equal to the President’s, presents a compelling argument for unity.
For any opposition leader to successfully challenge and potentially unseat President Hichilema, the fragmented political architecture must be superseded by a unified front capable of consolidating the diverse opposition base into a singular, formidable electoral force.
Socialist Party President Dr. Fred M’membe has been released on police bond following his arrest by the Zambia Police Service on charges of harassment and humiliation under the Cyber Crimes Act No. 4 of 2025.
The 66-year-old opposition leader was formally charged and detained at Chilenje Police Station
CF ACCEPTS INVITATION FOR COUNCIL OF ELDERS CONFERENCE WITH CONDITIONS…..
28th February, 2026
The Board Chairman Centre for Policy Dialogue 6 Nalubuto Road, Rhodes Park Lusaka
Dear Dr. Neo Simutanyi,
RE: INVITATION TO A NATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NATIONAL RENEWAL AND TRANSFORMATIVE LEADERSHIP
The above subject matter refers.
We would like to thank you for the invitation to participate in the above captioned conference taking place on 6th – 7th March, 2026.
As a party, we fully acknowledge the numerous challenges our nation is passing through and the need for collective action to address systemic social pressures, economic strain and governance challenges.
It’s therefore an honour for the Citizens First to express our willingness to be part of a platform that will critically examine Zambia’s political trajectory, confront economic challenges and address current democratic deficits as a way of coming up with a clear path for cohesive national renewal.
On this premise, and in order for us to prepare adequately for participation, we would like to respectfully request the organisers to avail us with the following information as a bare minimum requirement to inform our participation transparently:
1. Comprehensive list of delegates
2. Rules that will govern the election of a flag bearer
3. Confirmation and participation of the Electoral Commission
We look forward to hearing from you regarding the above request at your earliest convenience.
Maureen Nkandu Supports Field Ruwe on Frank Mutubila
Frank Mutubila: Neither Broadcaster nor Journalist.
Field Ruwe wrote an Update
“Zambia’s finest newscaster and broadacster Maureen Nkandu; former presenter and producer of BBC’s “Focus on Africa” and holder of a Master’s Degree in Journalism from the University of Wales writes in the comments section:”
“Spot on Field Ruwe. In fact a lot of people who pass as journalists in Zambia are not. Some are mere DJs or presenters, not to disrespect the work they do, but that doesn’t make you a journalist.
“A journalist finds facts, talks to people, and shares news and stories with the public through newspapers, radio, television, or online media. They will have had specialist training in the field, can analyse issues, both eloquently in speech and in the writing, and give experts analysis on a variant of subjects”.
“I’ve always said that not all who sit in front of a camera or mic, are journalists. Take the BBC for instance. Some of the world’s best news readers in London are playwrites, actors/ actresses, linguists and performing artists, or English language teachers. They come in to read the news, then go back to their usual jobs. So not all broadcasters are journalists.”
“The same goes with those who claim to be communication experts or PR managers. The assumption that because they worked on radio and TV then they will be good Comms or PR staff is wrong. One needs specialised training and skills sets for such functions.”
….Norma Kapata Siame says attack on Frank Mutubila, Unfair and Unjustified.
Degrees, Chongololo Accents and Definitions: A Response to Dr Ruwe
Dr Field Ruwe sets out to prove that Frank Mutubila is neither a broadcaster nor a journalist but only a “presenter.” In local lingo, maybe what one might call a glorified Chola-boy of the media industry.
The argument is neat, academic, and confidently delivered. It is also unnecessarily rigid.
The piece hinges on one central idea: without a degree in broadcasting, one cannot properly be called a broadcaster. By that logic, half of Africa’s pioneering media figures would need their titles revoked retroactively. Broadcasting did not begin in lecture halls. It began in studios.
Ironically, the example of Larry King complicates the argument. King had no degree in broadcasting either, yet history comfortably refers to him as a legendary broadcaster. If decades behind a microphone, interviewing presidents and shaping public discourse do not qualify one as a broadcaster, what exactly does? a framed certificate?
The distinction between presenter and broadcaster may be correct in theory, but in practice, the media world is gloriously untidy. Presenters often research, script, interview, moderate, and influence national conversation.
For Me, as a two-ngwee journalist from Evelyn Hone College, that sounds like broadcasting.
The critique also strays into commentary about accents and personality. But since when did vocal style determine professional classification? If adopting a British tone disqualifies one from broadcasting, then half the Commonwealth is in trouble.
Experience matters. Fifty plus years on radio and television is not a hobby. It is a career. Titles in media are earned as much by impact and longevity as by academic qualification.
In the end, this feels less like a clarification of terms and more like a gatekeeping exercise. Broadcasting is a craft before it is a credential.
And if surviving five decades on air does not make one a veteran broadcaster, then perhaps we need a new dictionary and not a new degree.
