Home Blog Page 150

THEY PLAN TO HAND PF, TONSE TO ANOTHER OPPOSITION PARTY – KAPYANGA

zamobserver
-
4
THEY PLAN TO HAND PF, TONSE TO ANOTHER OPPOSITION PARTY – KAPYANGA

THEY PLAN TO HAND PF, TONSE TO ANOTHER OPPOSITION PARTY – KAPYANGA

MPIKA PF MP Francis Kapyanga claims that there are manoeuvres within PF to have the party and Tonse Alliance delivered to a named opposition political party.



He adds that the same opposition party has certain political figures flocking to it to form an alliance and endorse a flagbearer for 2026.



Kapyanga was commenting on the state of the opposition in the country as it heads towards the August polls.


Recently, The People’s Pact, a new movement consisting of civil society and political parties, announced Dr Fred M’membe of the Socialist Party as its flagbearer for the August 2026 General Elections.



In an interview, Kapyanga said the country could not afford to have a failed ruling party and a failed opposition at the same time.



“These politicians across the divide in the opposition, you find everyone is calling for unity. But when you call for a meeting to say, ‘you people should meet and discuss that unity,’ instead of discussing it, you’re talking about the unity in the media, they won’t come. Which means those are just lip words, with nothing tangible to actualise in terms of what they talk about,” he said.



“And the manoeuvres… We are aware there are manoeuvres to have PF and the Tonse Alliance delivered to a named opposition political party, that won’t happen. There are manoeuvres to deliver the ECL movement and the Tonse Alliance to a named opposition political party. And to that opposition political party, some figures are flocking there to say, ‘we are coming up with an alliance and we’ve endorsed this person as our flagbearer for 2026.’ We in the opposition must be very sincere, people are essentially tired. You cannot have a failed party in government and then also have a failed opposition”.

https://youtu.be/8iPmFje9mr0?si=YIrxq-NlzJK0-zFA



Further, Kapyanga said there was too much pettiness and a lack of wisdom within the opposition ranks.

He added that instead of some PF members fighting party presidential aspirant Brian Mundubile, they should take advantage of his popularity.



“There is so much pettiness in the opposition ranks, to start with. And there is so much lack of wisdom in the opposition ranks. This is the reason why the Zambian people are calling on Honourable Brian Mundubile, they are saying he’s the only one who looks like he can unite all these people. And now we have him as a person whom the Zambian people are looking up to, yet some elements within the Patriotic Front are fighting him,” said Kapyanga.



“What kind of political approach is that? If you are a good party or a good movement and you see that one amongst us is popular and the people want him, you can actually be very happy and take advantage of that and harness that support for your advantage. But instead, you start bringing him down and recording audios insulting him. What is that? That is just primitivity of the highest order. And we are not going to tolerate it anymore because we are tired”.

News Diggers

HH WANTS OUSTER OF ARCHBISHOP BANDA – M’MEMBE

webzed
-
9
HH WANTS OUSTER OF ARCHBISHOP BANDA – M’MEMBE

HH WANTS OUSTER OF ARCHBISHOP BANDA – M’MEMBE

PRESIDENT Hakainde Hichilema is determined to have Lusaka Catholic Archbishop Dr Alick Banda removed from his leadership position before the August 13 general election, opposition common presidential candidate Dr Fred M’membe has said.

Hichilema has unleashed the Drug Enforcement Commission to arrest and prosecute the head of the Catholic Church in the capital city and entire province of Lusaka on Monday on a trumped up charge.

“This attempt by Mr Hakainde Hichilema to discredit, criminalise and humiliate him [Archbishop Banda] is not new. It has been a political survival strategy of his from the very beginning of his government. It is intensified now to ensure that Archbishop Banda is removed long before this year’s August 13 general elections,” Dr M’membe, the president of the Socialist Party noted.

He said the attacks on Archbishop Banda using the DEC, which is today under his direct supervision and command, demonstrated the crassness of Hichilema’s politics.

“But it shouldn’t be forgotten that the Catholic Church has been under continual attack ever since the time of Jesus. Does anyone believe that it will suddenly end?” he said.

Dr M’membe said Hichilema was increasingly becoming politically insecure as Zambian headed to the polls.

“We can expect that he [HIchilema] will increase his attacks on the leadership of the Catholic Church, especially on Archbishop Banda,” he said.

“Catholicism is not about worldly power [even though it has involved itself in worldly matters], but its primary mission is personal salvation.”

He noted Catholic history was filled with martyrs who stood for the church and died at the hands of governments and men like Hichilema.

https://youtu.be/8iPmFje9mr0?si=YIrxq-NlzJK0-zFA

“Catholics should fully expect that under Mr Hichilema persecution will increase. To believe otherwise is to ignore his attitude towards the Catholic leadership, especially Archbishop Banda, over the last four years of his government,” Dr M’membe said

“Again, in difficult times like these, it is important to turn to the homily of Pope Francis on this score: Bishops must remember, particularly when under attack, that their role is to pray, be humble in knowing God chose them, and remain close to the people. In fact, a bishop does not seek refuge from the powerful, the elite, no. It will be the elite who criticise the bishop, while the people show love toward their bishop and confirm him in his vocation. In these times, it seems like the devil, the great accuser, has been let loose, and he’s got it in for the bishops,” Dr M’membe said.

“Let’s all pray for our archbishop and accompany him to DEC on Monday,” he said.

The Mast

John Sangwa has achieved  10%  of  1 million supporters

zamobserver
-
4
John Sangwa has achieved  10%  of  1 million supporters

MNR FOUNDER JOHN SANGWA EXTENDS MOBILIZATION OF 1 MILLION SUPPORTERS TO END OF FEBRUARY



Fellow Citizen,

I invite you to participate in the Movement for National Renewal (MNR), a civic platform committed to building one million (1,000,000) citizens ready to live and lead by the Constitution.



As of  31 December 2025, we had recorded nearly 10% of this target. Early technical challenges on the digital platform affected participation, but these have now been resolved.



To preserve the integrity of the process and allow full nationwide participation, the mobilisation period has been extended to 28 February 2026.



Participation may be anonymous, with privacy safeguards in place. A public progress counter will be available on the MNR website.

https://youtu.be/8iPmFje9mr0?si=YIrxq-NlzJK0-zFA



If you have not yet recorded your participation, please do so using my referral link below: https://mnr-zambia.com/r/bb29b48d



If you have already recorded your participation, I encourage you to share this message with other citizens who may wish to participate, using my referral link or your own referral link.

Thank you for your support.

RESPONSE TO THE ZCCB STATEMENT OF SOLIDARITY REGARDING THE SUMMONS OF ARCHBISHOP ALICK BANDA- House of Clergy Zambia

webzed
-
2
RESPONSE TO THE ZCCB STATEMENT OF SOLIDARITY REGARDING THE SUMMONS OF ARCHBISHOP ALICK BANDA- House of Clergy Zambia

RESPONSE TO THE ZCCB STATEMENT OF SOLIDARITY REGARDING THE SUMMONS OF ARCHBISHOP ALICK BANDA

House of Clergy Zambia
4th January 2026

The House of Clergy Zambia acknowledges and respects the Zambia Conference of Catholic Bishops (ZCCB) for their pastoral concern and solidarity with Archbishop Alick Banda. The Catholic Church has played, and continues to play, a vital role in shaping Zambia’s moral conscience, promoting justice, peace, and the dignity of all people. This contribution remains valued and respected.

However, it is important to offer a balanced and clarifying perspective in the interest of national cohesion, institutional integrity, and the rule of law.

First and foremost, this matter must be clearly understood as neither a dispute between the State and the Catholic Church, nor between the Government and the Church, nor between the President and the Catholic Church. It is also not an attack on Christianity, the episcopacy, or the Church’s prophetic mission. Rather, it concerns an individual who has been summoned to assist with inquiries in a specific matter of an administrative and legal nature.

The summons issued by the Drug Enforcement Commission does not relate to Archbishop Banda’s sermons, pastoral advocacy, public commentary, or his well-known voice in speaking for the poor and marginalized. It does not arise from his stance on governance or his moral oversight of national affairs. The matter under inquiry, as publicly indicated by DEC , relates to a specific issue concerning a motor vehicle, and nothing more.

Framing this lawful inquiry as “state-sponsored persecution” or as an attempt to suppress the Church’s prophetic voice risks mischaracterising the situation and unnecessarily elevating a personal legal matter into an institutional confrontation. Such framing may inadvertently create public misunderstanding and tension where none is required.

Zambia is a constitutional democracy founded on the principle that all citizens are equal before the law, regardless of office, title, religious standing, or social status. Supporting the rule of law does not negate respect for the Church, nor does it diminish the moral authority of religious leaders. On the contrary, allowing lawful processes to proceed without intimidation or pre-judgment strengthens both State institutions and moral leadership.

The House of Clergy Zambia therefore supports the Government’s position that investigative institutions must be allowed to carry out their mandates professionally, independently, and without undue pressure. This should not be construed as hostility toward the Catholic Church, but rather as fidelity to constitutional order and justice.

We further caution against the politicisation of this matter. Attempts by political actors or commentators to recast a legal inquiry into a political or religious standoff are unhelpful and risk polarising the nation. Zambia has a proud history of constructive Church–State engagement rooted in mutual respect, dialogue, and national interest.

https://youtu.be/8iPmFje9mr0?si=YIrxq-NlzJK0-zFA

We urge all stakeholders—including Church leaders, political leaders, and the public—to exercise restraint in language and action, and to allow due process to take its course. Dialogue and mutual respect, as rightly emphasized by the ZCCB, must indeed remain our guiding principles.

The House of Clergy Zambia reaffirms its commitment to peace, justice, accountability, and national unity, under our shared motto: One Zambia, One Nation. These values are best upheld when institutions are respected, truth is pursued calmly, and no individual or institution is placed above the law.

May wisdom, sobriety, and good faith guide us all in this moment.

Issued by:
Rev Jimmy Ng’ambi
National Executive Director -House of Clergy Zambia

MPS HAVE SOLD OUR DEMOCRACY CHEAPLY – SENSIO

zamobserver
-
0
MPS HAVE SOLD OUR DEMOCRACY CHEAPLY – SENSIO

MPS HAVE SOLD OUR DEMOCRACY CHEAPLY – SENSIO

ZAMBIANS are facing serious economic and social hardships because parliamentarians have decided to sell the country’s democracy cheaply for financial benefits, former Kasenengwa member of Parliament Sensio Banda has said.



Banda told The Mast in an interview the current crop of members of Parliament (MPs) would find it difficult to rebuild the broken public trust they had commanded at some point after betraying the people of Zambia.



“Accountability may be delayed, but it is rarely denied. Constituents will one day demand explanations, without envelopes, protection or rehearsed justifications. Leadership requires sacrifice, not convenience,” Banda said.



He reminded the MPs that a parliamentary seat was not personal property but a public trust.

Banda said in a constitutional democracy, parliament was meant to be the final shield between state power and the people.

https://youtu.be/8iPmFje9mr0?si=YIrxq-NlzJK0-zFA



“When citizens conclude that MPs can be bought, elections lose moral weight, and political participation gives way to apathy. The poor pay first and pay most. Parliamentary records and public memory endure longer than political excuses,” he said.



Banda reminded the MPs that when a vote was traded for money, favours, or promises, it was not merely a position sold, but the independence and freedom of the people.



“MPs are not hired contractors executing instructions from financiers or party hierarchies; they are elected to exercise independent judgment on behalf of citizens,” he said.



Banda said a short-term legislative win achieved through inducement produced a long-term institutional decay and destroyed the principle of good governance.



“Defenders of inducements often hide behind phrases like ‘party discipline’ or ‘political reality. But constitutional amendments are not routine business. They reshape the balance of power, representation, and accountability,” Banda said.



He said parliamentary decisions demand the highest ethical standards among MPs, saying inducing votes on constitutional matters was not pragmatism, but constitutional destruction.



“When MPs are seen as purchasable, debate becomes performance, oversight weakens, and Parliament risks becoming an extension of executive will rather than a check upon it,” he said.



Banda warned that any member of parliament who feared those in power more than the voters had abandoned the electorate and should be ready to face the wrath of those who elected him.



“When parliament becomes a parley of inducements, democracy is placed on auction. And when democracy is sold, it is never the powerful who suffer most; it is the ordinary citizen whose voice is discounted and whose future is bargained away. Zambia deserves a Parliament guided by conscience, not receipts,” said Banda.

The Mast

WE SHALL WORK WITH THE GOVERNMENT OF THE DAY, NOT THE PREVIOUS GOVERNMENT – SENIOR CHIEF MWAMBA

webzed
-
0
WE SHALL WORK WITH THE GOVERNMENT OF THE DAY, NOT THE PREVIOUS GOVERNMENT – SENIOR CHIEF MWAMBA

WE SHALL WORK WITH THE GOVERNMENT OF THE DAY, NOT THE PREVIOUS GOVERNMENT – SENIOR CHIEF MWAMBA

January 03, 2026

Kasama – Senior Chief Mwamba has reaffirmed that chiefs in Northern Province will continue to work with the government of the day and not the previous government.

Senior Chief Mwamba of Kasama District said traditional leaders do not align themselves with previous governments, but instead rely on the government in power to ensure continuity in development programmes across chiefdoms.

Speaking on behalf of fellow chiefs when they met the Special Advisor to the President for Political Affairs, Mr Levy Ngoma, the chief noted that this approach helps communities benefit from government policies without disruption.

He stressed that chiefs have a duty to collaborate closely with government officials so that the real development needs of their people are identified and addressed.

Senior Chief Mwamba also urged citizens, especially those in opposition, to respect the Presidency, stating that once a person is elected President, he or she becomes the Chief Executive Officer of the country and deserves respect regardless of political affiliation or personal views.

The chief called on the people of Zambia to desist from violence, especially as the country approaches elections, stating that the desire of chiefs is a peaceful country.

While giving guidance, he encouraged UPND mayoral candidate Mr Bywell Simposya to seek God’s guidance and commit to serving all the people of Kasama equally once elected.

Mr Ngoma, delivering a message on behalf of the Head of State, said that the President desires to deepen the relationship with all 286 chiefs across the country in working together.

Mr Ngoma said that funds for building chiefs’ palaces are available and that, despite a few challenges, the government’s desire is to complete all the palaces as soon as possible, while also promoting farming as a business to drive national development.

Mr Levy Ngoma was accompanied by the Minister of Commerce and Industry, Mr Chipoka Mulenga; the Minister of Northern Province, Mr Leonard Mbao; the Vice Chairperson for Elections, Hon Likando Mufalali; Ms Beauty Undi Phiri, the Deputy Permanent Secretary in Kasama; and other party officials.

TFN

THIS IS NOT PERSECUTION — IT IS INVESTIGATION

zamobserver
-
0
THIS IS NOT PERSECUTION — IT IS INVESTIGATION

THIS IS NOT PERSECUTION — IT IS INVESTIGATION

Written by Shamoba

The statement circulating in public suggesting that President Hakainde Hichilema is “going after” Lusaka Archbishop Dr. Alick Banda is misleading, exaggerated, and deliberately crafted to push a false narrative.



Let us separate emotion from facts.

Archbishop Alick Banda has not been arrested, charged, or persecuted. He has been called by the Drug Enforcement Commission (DEC) to assist with investigations, a normal legal process that applies to all citizens in Zambia. Being called for questioning does not mean guilt, and it does not amount to harassment or intimidation.



Trying to dress up a lawful investigation as an attack on the Catholic Church or Christianity is dishonest propaganda. Zambia being a Christian nation does not mean clergy are exempt from the law. Christianity itself teaches truth, accountability, and cooperation with lawful authority—not immunity.

https://youtu.be/8iPmFje9mr0?si=YIrxq-NlzJK0-zFA



It is also wrong to drag the President into an operational matter handled by independent institutions. President Hakainde Hichilema does not run investigations, does not summon individuals, and does not interfere with law enforcement agencies. To suggest otherwise is to mislead the public and undermine confidence in State institutions.



If we begin to treat every investigation involving a prominent figure as persecution, then we are effectively saying some people are above the law. That is a dangerous path for democracy.



Zambia must reject sensationalism and emotional blackmail. Let institutions do their work. Let investigations proceed without political or religious noise. And let us stop weaponising faith to score political points.



This is not about attacking a Bishop.
This is not about fighting the Church.
This is about upholding the rule of law.

Truth must always be louder than propaganda.

Written with love by Aaron Shamoba

MINISTRY OF EDUCATION READY FOR JANUARY 12 SCHOOL REOPENING UNDER EXPANDED NEW CURRICULUM

zamobserver
-
1
MINISTRY OF EDUCATION READY FOR JANUARY 12 SCHOOL REOPENING UNDER EXPANDED NEW CURRICULUM

MINISTRY OF EDUCATION READY FOR JANUARY 12 SCHOOL REOPENING UNDER EXPANDED NEW CURRICULUM



The Ministry of Education has assured the nation of its full preparedness for the reopening of schools on January 12, 2026, as learners return for the new academic year under an expanding revised curriculum framework.



Assistant Director and Head of Communication at the Ministry of Education, Kunda Mando, said the ministry is ready and eager to welcome learners back to school, adding that comprehensive measures have been put in place to ensure a smooth, orderly and productive start to the school term.



Ms. Mando disclosed that all schools will observe a “zero week” from January 5 to January 9, which will serve as a critical preparation period. During this time, teachers will develop lesson plans and schemes of work, while head teachers will convene planning meetings with school management teams and heads of departments to align on academic and administrative priorities.



She further stated that schools across the country have already been cleaned and prepared in readiness for the learners’ return. Ms. Mando explained that this has been made possible through the provision of school grants, which enable head teachers to employ gardeners and cleaners to maintain school environments.

https://youtu.be/8iPmFje9mr0?si=YIrxq-NlzJK0-zFA



Ms. Mando also highlighted that the ministry is continuing with the phased implementation of the new curriculum, which was introduced in 2025. She said learners who began under the revised curriculum in Early Childhood Education (ECE), Grade One and Form One will now progress to ECE Level Two, Grade Two and Form Two respectively.



In addition, she noted that new entrants at ECE Level One, Grade One and Form One will also be enrolled under the revised curriculum, as the ministry steadily expands the framework across the education system.



The Ministry of Education has since called on parents, guardians and learners to prepare adequately for the reopening of schools, as it remains committed to delivering quality and relevant education aligned with national development goals.

SPICE FM

POLICE WARN AGAINST DISORDER AS ARCHBISHOP BANDA APPEARS BEFORE DEC ON MONDAY

zamobserver
-
0
POLICE WARN AGAINST DISORDER AS ARCHBISHOP BANDA APPEARS BEFORE DEC ON MONDAY

POLICE WARN AGAINST DISORDER AS ARCHBISHOP BANDA APPEARS BEFORE DEC ON MONDAY

THE Zambia Police has issued a stern warning to individuals against causing disorder as Lusaka Archbishop Alick Banda appears before the Drug Enforcement Commission on Monday, following heightened public interest in the matter.

DEC last week summoned Archbishop Banda to appear before the commission over a case involving a vehicle that was given to him by the Zambia Revenue Authority during the previous regime.

https://youtu.be/8iPmFje9mr0?si=YIrxq-NlzJK0-zFA

Speaking to Phoenix News in an interview, Zambia Police spokesperson Godfrey Chilabi says police are aware of discussions and mobilization on social media surrounding the Archbishop’s appearance and has emphasized that law enforcement had a duty to maintain public safety and order during such events.

He explains that while citizens are free to express themselves within the confines of the law, any actions that cross legal boundaries would attract police intervention and will not hesitate to act against individuals intending to cause chaos or disrupt public peace.

Mr. Chilabi has since appealed to individuals to remain calm, peaceful, and law-abiding, stressing that the role of the police is to protect all citizens and uphold the law as investigations by DEC continue.

PN

GUINEA JUNTA CHIEF WINS PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION BY LANDSLIDE

zamobserver
-
1
GUINEA JUNTA CHIEF WINS PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION BY LANDSLIDE

GUINEA JUNTA CHIEF WINS PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION BY LANDSLIDE

GUINEA’S junta chief Gen Mamady Doumbouya has won the presidential election by a landslide, getting 86.7% of the vote, according to provisional results published by the election commission.



The general is hoping to legitimise his rule after seizing power in a coup in 2021.

A civil society group calling for the return of civilian rule has condemned the election as a “charade” after Gen Doumbouya’s main rivals were barred from contesting, while opposition candidates said the poll was marred by irregularities.



The Democratic Front of Guinea’s flagbearer, Abdoulaye Yero Balde, came a distant second with 6.6%, followed by the Liberal Bloc’s Faya Lansana Millimono with 2%, provisional results show.



On Monday, internet monitoring group NetBlocks reported that access to social media platforms TikTok, YouTube and Facebook had been restricted as Guineans waited for the full results.



There has been no official comment on the restrictions, but opponents see it as an attempt by the junta to stifle criticism of the results.

The 41-year-old general’s victory gives him a seven-year mandate. Should the results be challenged, the Supreme Court has eight days to validate them.



Millimono said on Monday that the election was marred by “systematic fraudulent practices”, citing the expulsion of poll observers, ballot stuffing and intimidation.



The ruling party and the government have yet to comment on the complaints.

After overthrowing then-83-year-old President Alpha Condé in 2021, Gen Doumbouya promised not to seek election and to hand power to a civilian.



“Neither I nor any member of this transition will be a candidate for anything… As soldiers, we value our word very much,” he said at the time.

The junta leader broke his promise by putting his name on the ballot after a new constitution, implemented in September, permitted him to run for office.



Djenabou Toure, the country’s top election official who announced the provisional results, put the voter turnout at more than 80%.

However, a civil society group, the National Front for the Defence of the Constitution, said in a statement on Monday that the turnout was low.



“A huge majority of Guineans chose to boycott the electoral charade,” the National Front for the Defence of the Constitution was quoted as saying by the AFP news agency.



Eight other candidates took part in Sunday’s election, but with the exclusion of main opposition parties RPG Arc en Ciel and UFDG, none of the participants have a solid political footing.



According to the provisional results, six of them got less than 2% of the vote, with Mohamed Nabe getting 0.8%.

Although he is popular with many of Guinea’s youth, Gen Doumbouya has been criticised for restricting opposition activities, banning protests and stifling press freedom in the run-up to the elections.



The general justified deposing Condé on similar charges – including rampant corruption, disregard for human rights and economic mismanagement.



Guinea has the world’s largest bauxite reserves and some of its richest iron ore. Last month, authorities launched the gigantic Simandou iron-ore mine to widespread anticipation.



However, over half of the population lives in poverty, according to World Bank figures.

BBC

TRUMP TARGETS CUBA NEXT AFTER VENEZUELA MADURO — PRESIDENT SAYS CUBANS HAVE ENDURED MANY YEARS OF HARDSHIP

zamobserver
-
1
TRUMP TARGETS CUBA NEXT AFTER VENEZUELA MADURO — PRESIDENT SAYS CUBANS HAVE ENDURED MANY YEARS OF HARDSHIP

TRUMP TARGETS CUBA NEXT AFTER VENEZUELA MADURO — PRESIDENT SAYS CUBANS HAVE ENDURED MANY YEARS OF HARDSHIP



U.S. President Donald Trump has indicated that Cuba could be his next focus following the operation in Venezuela and the arrest of Nicolás Maduro. He described the island nation as a “badly failing country” and said the United States will likely be discussing Cuba “soon,” highlighting the longstanding struggles of its people.”



🇨🇺 WHAT TRUMP SAID

Trump pointed out that Cubans have endured many years of hardship, suggesting that the country has not been able to provide basic opportunities or prosperity to its citizens. He referred to Cuba as failing and implied that Washington may take a stronger interest in the country’s political and economic situation, similar to what happened in Venezuela.



CONTEXT: CUBA’S CHALLENGES

While Trump did not go into detail, Cuba has faced decades of:

Economic difficulties linked to the U.S. embargo and global isolation

Political restrictions and limited freedoms

Shortages of essential goods and constrained economic growth

For over 60 years, ordinary Cubans have struggled, while those close to the government have often been the ones benefiting most.



🇻🇪 CUBA AND VENEZUELA

Cuba has historically supported Venezuela politically and economically, receiving oil subsidies and other support from Caracas. This close alignment makes Cuba a key ally in the region that the U.S. has long scrutinized.



🗣️ WHAT CUBANS ARE SAYING

Although Trump’s remarks were aimed at U.S. policy, many Cubans are aware of the country’s long-term economic and social challenges. Discussions on social media reflect frustration with both government mismanagement and the impact of international pressures on daily life.



⚠️ WHY TRUMP IS TALKING ABOUT CUBA NOW

After Venezuela and the arrest of Maduro, Trump is signalling that the U.S. is watching allied countries closely and may increase diplomatic or economic pressure where it sees failing governance or persistent hardship.



💥 Trump’s message is clear: Cuba is next on the U.S. radar, and the international community should pay attention to how long-standing hardship might intersect with rising political pressure.

All signs point to Hichilema retaining office this year, Sunday Chanda observes

webzed
-
6
All signs point to Hichilema retaining office this year, Sunday Chanda observes

All signs point to Hichilema retaining office this year, Chanda observes

KANCHIBIYA Member of Parliament Sunday Chanda says all credible political indicators suggest President Hakainde Hichilema is on course to retain power in this year’s general elections.

Chanda said whether one supports President Hichilema or not, the political writing on the wall cannot be ignored and should force the Opposition and Civil Society Organisations (CSOs) to rethink their approach to national politics.

He observed that the Opposition has largely remained stuck in campaign mode, expending energy on rhetoric, mobilization and reaction instead of building policy-driven structures capable of offering credible alternatives to government.

“All credible political indicators point to President Hakainde Hichilema retaining office in the 2026 general elections,” Chanda stated.

“Whether one supports him or not, this reality demands a strategic recalibration, especially by the Opposition and Civil Society Organisations (CSOs).”

Chanda has further warned opposition political parties and CSOs against wasting time fantasizing about the 2026 general elections, saying the real work of democracy lies beyond the ballot.

According to the lawmaker, elections are not the destination of democracy but merely the starting point of governance.

Chanda added that CSOs have also limited themselves to election-season activism, leaving critical areas such as budget oversight, procurement monitoring, debt transparency and governance scrutiny largely unattended once voting ends.

Chanda further urged CSOs to sharpen their tools by investing in forensic budget tracking, mining contract transparency, procurement oversight and debt accountability.https://kalemba.news/…/all-signs-point-to-hichilema…/

By George Musonda

Kalemba January 4, 2026

WHY DO CATHOLIC BISHOPS SAY BISHOP ALICK BANDA IS BEING PERSECUTED BY THE UPND GOVT?- Kellys Kaunda

zamobserver
-
7
WHY DO CATHOLIC BISHOPS SAY BISHOP ALICK BANDA IS BEING PERSECUTED BY THE UPND GOVT?- Kellys Kaunda

By Kellys Kaunda

WHY DO CATHOLIC BISHOPS SAY BISHOP ALICK BANDA IS BEING PERSECUTED BY THE UPND GOVT?



The answer is very simple: they believe it’s because the UPND government doesn’t like his critical comments on public affairs.

And there are many Zambians who believe likewise.



Secondly, they know that the UPND government  has been using the criminal justice system to respond to its critics.

And there are many Zambians who believe likewise.



Thirdly, they know the selective application of the law as practiced by government.

And there are many Zambians who know the same to be true.



For instance, the ruling party SG once insulted Bishop Banda by calling him Lucifer, in what qualified as hate speech, but the man was not prosecuted.



So, the Catholic Bishops are very much on firm ground when they characterize the summoning of Bishop Banda as persecution intended not only to silence his voice but that of the entire Catholic church.



To justify the summoning of Bishop Banda by arguing that no one is above the law is to insult the collective wisdom of the Catholic Bishops who have come to know the plight associated with consistent voices of criticism.



In fact, the majority Zambians know there’re two types of criminal justice systems in Zambia – one for government critics and another for ruling party supporters.

If you are a senior ruling party chief, you can call anybody’s gospel minister, father, husband, or brother a Lucifer and no one will touch you because you are above the law!



Make no mistake, the justification employed by DEC to summon Bishop Banda is very sound at law.

In fact, it is so sound, it makes the Catholic Bishops look unreasonable.



And that’s exactly how the UPND government wants everybody else to read into these developments.

However, read in context, the position of the Catholic Bishops become clearly reasonable and the only response and language commensurate with the double standards practiced by the government of President Hichilema.



Against this backdrop, I embrace the statement of solidarity by the Catholic Bishops as wise, fair and deeply principled.



I hope it places the UPND government on notice that Zambians are fully awake taking in every act of injustice and in due season, every wrongdoer currently hiding behind the shelter of incumbency will be given a taste of their own medicine.



One psychologist once said, “No one stretches the fibre of reality without it snapping back at them and hitting real hard”.

IS THE CATHOLIC CHURCH A GOVERNMENT WITHIN A GOVERNMENT?

zamobserver
-
4
IS THE CATHOLIC CHURCH A GOVERNMENT WITHIN A GOVERNMENT?

IS THE CATHOLIC CHURCH A GOVERNMENT WITHIN A GOVERNMENT?

Zambia is a constitutional democracy founded on the supremacy of the Constitution, the rule of law and the principle that all citizens are equal before the law. No institution, religious, political or social, stands above this framework. It is against this backdrop that an increasingly uncomfortable national question must be asked: Is the Catholic Church positioning itself as a government within the Government of Zambia?



Historically, the Catholic Church has played a significant role in Zambia’s social and political life. From advocating for multiparty democracy to speaking against social injustice, the Church has often been viewed as a moral compass, especially during times of national crisis. That role, however, has increasingly blurred the line between moral guidance and overt political influence.



Over the years, whenever the Church has felt challenged or threatened, whether by policy, governance decisions or legal scrutiny, it has not been uncommon to hear calls from senior clergy urging citizens to “get voters’ cards” and prepare to vote out the sitting government. While civic participation is a constitutional right, repeated political mobilisation by a powerful religious institution raises serious questions about intent, balance and accountability.



Is it healthy for Zambia’s democracy when one church, by virtue of its size, history and moral authority, appears able to openly shape political outcomes? Should the Catholic Church be allowed to project itself as the most powerful church in the country, with the perceived authority to dictate the political landscape and, by extension, the future of Zambia?



Equally concerning is the growing narrative that bishops, reverends and priests should be beyond criticism because they are “speaking for the voiceless.” Advocating for the poor and marginalised is noble and necessary. However, moral advocacy does not confer immunity from scrutiny, nor does it place anyone above the law. In a constitutional state, no individual or institution, no matter how revered, should enjoy unchecked influence.



The law is clear: governance is exercised through constitutionally mandated institutions. Religious bodies, like all civil society actors, have a right to express opinions, but they also have a responsibility to respect legal processes and democratic boundaries. When clergy speak on matters of governance, they do so as citizens, not as an alternative authority to the state.



The danger of elevating any church to an untouchable political status is that it undermines both democracy and faith itself. Democracy suffers because accountability becomes selective. Faith suffers because the church risks being seen not as a moral guide, but as a partisan power broker. Zambia is a Christian nation, but it is not a theocracy. Our national values must be guided by faith, yes, but governed by law. The Constitution, not the pulpit, is the supreme authority in matters of governance.



Ultimately, the principle must remain non-negotiable: no one is above the law. All men and women are equal before it, whether they sit in State House, stand behind a pulpit, or kneel in a pew. Respect for this principle is what will safeguard Zambia’s democracy, preserve religious freedom, and ensure that moral voices contribute constructively without overpowering the democratic will of the people.

By Chilufya Kasonde

Ilelanga News. January 04, 2026.

Catholics to hold mass for Alick Banda before appearing at DEC tomorrow

zamobserver
-
6
Catholics to hold mass for Alick Banda before appearing at DEC tomorrow

Catholics to hold mass for Alick Banda before appearing at DEC tomorrow

LUSAKA Archdiocese Catholics have been guided to attend a solidarity mass tomorrow morning for their Archbishop Dr Alick Banda before appearing at the Drug Enforcement Commission (DEC) headquarters.




Archbishop Banda is expected to explain himself over the Zambia Revenue Authority (ZRA) Hilux which was dubiously gifted to him by the PF.



In a memo, Lusaka Archdiocese vicar general Andrew Simpasa urged Catholics to attend mass at 08:00 hours and there after ‘dutifully report’ to DEC offices.



“Accordingly, we shall be most obliged if this is complied with,” read the memo.

Fr Simpasa also told all parishes in the archdiocese of Lusaka to read the Zambia Conference of Catholic Bishops (ZCCB) statement during announcements at all masses today.

The ZCCB statement is condemning the summons of the Archbishop, claiming that such an act is an attack on the church.



Meanwhile, DEC director general Nason Banda had on new year warned that the archbishop should not carry people that are ‘irrelevant to the case with him as he appears at the commission’s headquarters

By Catherine Pule

Kalemba, January 4, 2025

Summoning of Archbishop Alick  Banda is state sponsored persecution – Catholic Bishops

zamobserver
-
7
Summoning of Archbishop Alick  Banda is state sponsored persecution – Catholic Bishops

It’s a State attack on the Church, on her Bishops and leaders, and on Archbishop Alick Banda-ZCCB



●As ZCCB, we view this action as an attempt to suppress his voice as a Shepherd of the Archdiocese of Lusaka and a member of ZCCB.



●Archbishop Banda has faced consistent
name-calling and what we can now recognize as state-sponsored persecution.

●We consider it an abuse of authority for the ruling party to utilize state machinery against
an individual due to his stance on national governance and his efforts to hold the government accountable.



●We therefore condemn all forms of intimidation, harassment, and persecution
directed against the Catholic Church and her leaders.

●Such actions not only wound the
‘Body of Christ”, the Church, but also threaten the moral fabric and unity of our
nation.



●The Church’s voice must remain free to speak truth to powers that be, to comfort the afflicted, and to guide Zambia toward a future rooted in our motto: One
Zambia One Nation!


●Once again, the ZCCB expresses full solidarity with Archbishop Banda during this
period. We reaffirm that it is morally wrong to use state institutions to persecute those
who hold dissent views and/or provide oversight on matters of governance.
●Dialogue
and mutual respect should be the way to go
We exhort the Catholic faithful and all people of good.



Below is the full statement;

We, members of the Zambia Conference of Catholic Bishops (ZCCB), express our unwavering solidarity with Archbishop Alick Banda and all the Catholic faithful in
Zambia in the face of ongoing attacks against the Church’s mission and leadership.



We are aware that Most Reverend Alick Banda, Metropolitan Archbishop of Lusaka, has been summoned to appear before the Anti-Money Laundering Investigations Unit
of the Drug Enforcement Commission on Monday, 5th January 2026.



This was contained in a letter of summons delivered to him on 31st December 2025.

As ZCCB, we view this action as an attempt to suppress his voice as a Shepherd of the Archdiocese of Lusaka and a member of ZCCB. Archbishop Banda has faced consistent name-calling and what we can now recognize as state-sponsored persecution.



We consider it an abuse of authority for the ruling party to utilize state machinery against
an individual due to his stance on national governance and his efforts to hold the government accountable.



The Catholic Church has, for many years, stood as a beacon of faith, justice, and service to the people of Zambia.



Today, as attempts are made to silence her prophetic voice and undermine her pastoral mission, we affirm that the Church’s role in defending truth, justice, and human dignity cannot be diminished or suppressed.

LUBINDA DESERVES THE PF PRESIDENCY….experience and proven leadership

zamobserver
-
4
LUBINDA DESERVES THE PF PRESIDENCY….experience and proven leadership

LUBINDA DESERVES THE PF PRESIDENCY

….experience and proven leadership



By Augustine Mwewa – Icimwene Bonse For 2026 Bahati  MP

It is clear that Lubinda has the experience and credentials to lead the Patriotic Front (PF). The people of Kabwata Constituency can testify to his track record as a dedicated representative and leader.



He has served the party in many key portfolios, including Secretary-General, Vice President, and now Acting President, demonstrating deep institutional knowledge and loyalty. He has also held multiple ministerial positions, including Tourism, Agriculture, Foreign Affairs, and Justice, gaining extensive experience in governance and policy-making at the highest levels. Notably, as Minister of Justice, he played a crucial role in removing the discriminatory parentage clause, showing vision and commitment to justice.



All other aspirants seeking to lead the PF are, in comparison, junior in parliamentary and executive experience. I can confidently assert that GL’s experience surpasses even that of the sitting President, making him the only candidate capable of competing effectively against HH in the decisive “Battle of the Zambezi.”



GL’s leadership is also critical for the PF to shed the tribal label that has unfairly burdened the party, a challenge the UPND has long faced since the passing of its founding leader, Anderson Mazoka. It is not true that leadership of the PF must come only from the North or the East; GL’s track record proves leadership transcends region.



When Mama Inonge retired from politics, Lubinda was appointed PF Vice President, and when ECL departed, GL served as Acting President, managing the party’s transition seamlessly, even after the passing of ECL, the second PF President. His experience and seniority make him the most qualified among all aspirants to lead the party.



I challenge each of the other aspirants to produce a documented record of their achievements as MPs, whether currently serving or having served, before asking Zambians to entrust them with the Republic’s Presidency. Leadership requires more than ambition—it requires proven results, experience, and vision, all of which GL possesses.

PF Cadre Chanda Chimba quits PF

zamobserver
-
1
PF Cadre Chanda Chimba quits PF

Chanda Chimba quits PF

STAUNCH Patriotic Front (PF) member Chanda Chimba has opted to jump out of the sank political party boat after 12 years of loyalty.





Chimba announced his resignation stating that the party was now a shadow of what it used to be.

In a resignation letter addressed to the acting president of the PF, announced his decision to step aside as a member, citing internal wrangles and the capture of the party by a small clique he described as self-appointed “true greens.”



He lamented that the PF of today no longer resembled the party that many members sacrificed for, arguing that endless infighting and lack of visionary leadership had fractured the party into multiple factions.

Chimba, who joined the PF after personally choosing to support late Edgar Lungu, said the party had been driven by selfish interests.



He accused a section of the leadership of enforcing exclusionary politics, insisting that only they or their preferred candidates were fit to lead, a move he said had pushed away many loyal members.



According to Chimba, assurances made after the 2021 general elections that the PF would undergo a genuine rebranding exercise turned out to be misleading, as greed took centre stage.

Despite his resignation, Chimba made it clear that he was not defecting to any political party and would remain independent.



“As I take this step, I wish to respectfully pay tribute to the late former President. Under his leadership, I learned many lessons in politics, leadership, and public service,” Chimba wrote in the resignation letter.https://kalemba.news/politics/chanda-chimba-quits-pf/

By George Musonda

Kalemba January 4, 2026

No One Above the Law: Why DEC’s Summons of Bishop Banda Is Justified
‎An Opinion  by Rev Walter Mwambazi

zamobserver
-
2
No One Above the Law: Why DEC’s Summons of Bishop Banda Is Justified<br>‎An Opinion  by Rev Walter Mwambazi

‎🚨 No One Above the Law: Why DEC’s Summons of Bishop Banda Is Justified
‎An Opinion 🪞 by Rev Walter Mwambazi


‎
‎I know that my headline here alone will get me labelled with the usual names but the truth of it doesn’t change on account of the fact that a clergyman is the person of interest.


‎
‎As we all know now, the recent summoning of Bishop Alick Banda by the Drug Enforcement Commission (DEC), in connection with the gifting of a Hilux vehicle by former Zambia Revenue Authority Director General Kingsley Chanda, has ignited fierce debate across social media. Some argue that the move is an act of victimization, while others insist it is a rightful exercise of the Commission’s mandate. 


‎
‎But let’s pause and ask: Are church leaders above the law? Should accountability only apply to politicians and ordinary citizens, while clergy remain untouchable? 


‎
‎⚖️ Equal Accountability Under the Law
‎
‎Church leaders are part of society. They benefit from the same protections, rights, and privileges as everyone else – and therefore must also be subject to the same laws. When politicians are summoned to explain their wealth, we applaud it as a step toward transparency. When ordinary citizens are questioned by DEC, it barely makes headlines. Why then should it be different when a church leader is called to account? 


‎
‎The Hilux in question was gifted by a man who has since been convicted in relation to the same case. Authorities have already impounded the vehicle, and whether or not it has been forfeited to the state, the fact remains: DEC is acting within its jurisdiction


‎
‎🔍 The Principle at Stake
‎
‎This is not about victimization. It is about consistency. If we demand accountability from politicians, business leaders, and ordinary citizens, then church leaders must also be answerable when questions arise. To exempt them would be to create a dangerous double standard – one that undermines the very rule of law we claim to uphold.


‎
‎🕊️ Faith and Integrity
‎
‎The church plays a vital role in shaping moral values and guiding society. But integrity is best demonstrated when leaders willingly submit to the same scrutiny as everyone else. Transparency strengthens credibility. Accountability reinforces trust. 


‎
‎✅ Conclusion
‎
‎As far as I am concerned, The DEC’s summons of Bishop Banda should not be seen as persecution, but as a necessary step in ensuring that justice applies equally to all. In a society striving for fairness, no one – whether politician, businessperson, or church leader – should be above the law.


‎
‎That last line has been repeated by virtually every Minister of Home Affairs and Justice in all the different administrations in Zambia. I do not think there should be any exception this time around.

WHO IS BEHIND THE LUNGU BURIAL IMPASSE? ZAMBIANS DESERVE THE TRUTH

zamobserver
-
4
WHO IS BEHIND THE LUNGU BURIAL IMPASSE? ZAMBIANS DESERVE THE TRUTH

WHO IS BEHIND THE LUNGU BURIAL IMPASSE? ZAMBIANS DESERVE THE TRUTH

BY Chilufya Kasonde

Zambians continue to watch with growing concern and disappointment the prolonged impasse surrounding the burial of former President Edgar Chagwa Lungu (ECL). What should have been a dignified, unifying national moment has instead turned into an unnecessary standoff between the Government and the Lungu family, with the nation left in the dark as to who is truly dictating the terms of this delay.

It is no longer sufficient for key family representatives, particularly Makebi Zulu and former First Lady Esther Lungu, to remain silent or evasive on this matter. They owe the Zambian people clarity. They know who is influencing the conditions attached to the burial and the continued delay in repatriating the remains of the former Head of State from South Africa.

Public discourse increasingly points to the involvement of Archbishop Alick Banda, who has been repeatedly mentioned as a central figure in the disputed burial arrangements. If true, this raises serious questions about the appropriateness of clerical involvement in matters that are clearly national, political, and constitutional in nature.


Former President Edgar Chagwa Lungu was not merely a private citizen; he served the Republic of Zambia as Head of State. As such, his burial transcends family preference and enters the realm of national responsibility and dignity. Demands allegedly being advanced, such as restricting the sitting President from viewing the body or attending the burial are unprecedented, divisive, and incompatible with Zambia’s traditions of peace, reconciliation, and respect for public office.

No individual, cleric or otherwise, should seek to demonstrate dominance over a democratically elected government by leveraging a national funeral. Zambia is a constitutional democracy governed by law, not by personal or institutional supremacy.

The appeal to Makebi Zulu and Esther Lungu is simple and sincere: re-engage the Government of the Republic of Zambia in good faith. Allow the remains of former President Edgar Chagwa Lungu to be repatriated so that the nation can accord him a befitting burial on Zambian soil, in recognition of his service to the country.

Equally important is the need to keep partisan politics out of mourning. The late President’s body should not become a political tool, nor should grief be weaponised ahead of the 2026 General Election. Such actions would dishonour both the legacy of ECL and the moral foundations of the nation.

Religious leaders, in particular, must exercise restraint and remain faithful to their sacred calling as agents of peace, unity, and moral guidance — not political actors. Zambia has a proud history of church-state cooperation built on mutual respect, not confrontation.

The nation is watching. History is recording. It is time for transparency, humility, and statesmanship to prevail, in death, as in life.- Ilelanga news

BILL 7 PASSED BECAUSE ALL POLITICAL PARTIES SUPPORTED IT – LEVY NGOMA

zamobserver
-
0
BILL 7 PASSED BECAUSE ALL POLITICAL PARTIES SUPPORTED IT – LEVY NGOMA

BILL 7 PASSED BECAUSE ALL POLITICAL PARTIES SUPPORTED IT – LEVY NGOMA

January 03, 2026

Kasama – Special Advisor to the President for Political Affairs, Mr. Levy Ngoma, has attributed the successful passage of Bill 7 into law to the collective support of all political parties represented in Parliament.

Mr. Ngoma explained that the Bill was not a product of one political formation, but a result of consensus and cooperation among Members of Parliament from different parties. He noted that Parliament comprises of four major political parties, all of which voted in support of the Bill, enabling it to pass into law.

He was speaking upon arrival at Kasama Airport in Northern Province yesterday, where he is on a working visit to assess various government developmental projects currently being implemented in the region.

Mr. Ngoma emphasized that President Hakainde Hichilema believes in inclusiveness and works with a wide range of stakeholders to ensure meaningful and equitable development across the country.

He stated that Bill 7 would not have passed if it had relied solely on the ruling UPND, but succeeded because of the goodwill and support from other political parties.

Mr. Ngoma further disclosed that during his stay in the province, he is scheduled to meet several traditional leaders, beginning with Mwine Lubemba, as part of continued engagement with traditional authorities.

(C) The Falcon News

GOVERNMENT RUBBISHES CLAIMS OF PLOT TO CONTAIN CATHOLIC CHURCH

zamobserver
-
0
GOVERNMENT RUBBISHES CLAIMS OF PLOT TO CONTAIN CATHOLIC CHURCH

GOVERNMENT RUBBISHES CLAIMS OF PLOT TO CONTAIN CATHOLIC CHURCH

By: Agness Nakazwe

The Ministry of Information and Media permanent secretary, Thabo Kawana, has dismissed social media reports claiming that President Hakainde Hichilema directed the Zambia Security Intelligence Service to contain the Catholic Church.


Speaking on ZNBC, Mr. Kawana expressed concern over the growing impunity of individuals fabricating messages and forging the President’s signature to make them appear genuine.


He described those behind the fake document as “brave,” but warned that their actions will soon catch up with them.


Mr. Kawana emphasized that the Cyber Crimes Act of 2024 provides no hiding place in cyberspace and assured that perpetrators will be tracked and prosecuted.


He revealed that investigations are already underway and progressing well.
He further cautioned the public against forging the President’s signature, stressing that such acts are criminal and punishable under the law.
#SunFmTvNews

After Capturing Venezuelan President, Trump Puts Columbian President on Notice Over Drug Trafficking to US

zamobserver
-
1
After Capturing Venezuelan President, Trump Puts Columbian President on Notice Over Drug Trafficking to US

BREAKING! After Capturing Venezuelan President, Trump Puts Columbian President on Notice Over Drug Trafficking to US.



The Columbian President Petro released a statement today condemning US military action in Venezuela and called for urgent UN security council meeting.



US President Donald Trump issued a direct warning to Colombia’s president following the US military operation that captured Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and took him out of the country.



Asked at a Florida press conference about Gustavo Petro saying he was not concerned about repercussions from the strikes on his neighbor, Trump claimed Petro “has cocaine mills” and “factories where he makes cocaine,” adding that “they’re sending it into the United States.”



“So he does have to watch his a–,” Trump added.

Last year, in the runup to the strikes on Venezuela, Trump frequently accused Caracas of being responsible for illegal drugs coming into the US.



On Cuba, Trump described the island country as “a failing nation” and criticized its leadership for what he called decades of economic collapse and suffering.



“The people there have suffered for many, many years, and I think Cuba is going to be something we’ll end up talking about,” he said.



“We want to help the people in Cuba, but we want to also help the people that were forced out of Cuba and living in this country,” he added. Florida has a large expatriate Cuban community that is well known for its fierce opposition to the island’s communist government.



Speaking alongside Trump, Secretary of State Marco Rubio — a Cuban American born in Miami — said: “Cuba is a disaster. It’s run by incompetent, senile men, and in some cases, not senile, but incompetent.”



He added: “All the guards that helped protect Maduro — this is well known — their whole spy agency, all of that, were full of Cubans. I mean, they basically, it’s amazing, this poor island took over Venezuela in some cases. One of the biggest problems the Venezuelans have is they have to declare independence from Cuba.”

Venezuela’s Supreme Court orders, Vice President Delcy Rodriguez become interim president

zamobserver
-
0
Venezuela’s Supreme Court orders, Vice President Delcy Rodriguez become interim president

Venezuela’s Supreme Court orders, Vice President Delcy Rodriguez become interim president



CARACAS, Jan 3 (Reuters) – The Constitutional Chamber of Venezuela’s Supreme Court ordered on Saturday that Vice President Delcy Rodríguez assume the role of acting president of the country in the absence of Nicolás Maduro, who was detained early Saturday morning in an operation by U.S. forces.

The court ruling said that Rodríguez would assume “the office of President of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, in order to guarantee administrative continuity and the comprehensive defense of the Nation.”

The ruling added that the court will debate the matter in order to “determine the applicable legal framework to guarantee the continuity of the State, the administration of government, and the defense of sovereignty in the face of the forced absence of the President of the Republic.”

Source: Reuters

Brexit Has Weakened Britain: How Leaving the EU Damaged the UK Economy, Strained Ties with Europe, and Left the Country at a Crossroads

zamobserver
-
0
Brexit Has Weakened Britain: How Leaving the EU Damaged the UK Economy, Strained Ties with Europe, and Left the Country at a Crossroads

Brexit Has Weakened Britain: How Leaving the EU Damaged the UK Economy, Strained Ties with Europe, and Left the Country at a Crossroads



Brexit was sold as a path to freedom, control, and economic renewal for Britain (the United Kingdom). Nearly a decade after the referendum, the reality is far more sobering. Leaving the European Union (EU) has not created new strengths — it has exposed and deepened long-standing weaknesses in the British economy while dulling the advantages the country once relied on.



1. Trade With Europe Has Become Harder — Not Easier

Before Brexit, Britain traded freely with 27 EU countries, including Germany, France, Ireland, Spain, Italy, and the Netherlands. Goods moved without customs checks, extra paperwork, or delays.



After Brexit:

British exporters face border checks, customs forms, and regulatory barriers

Small and medium businesses struggle most, as they cannot absorb extra costs



UK exports to the EU have stagnated or declined compared to pre-Brexit levels

European companies increasingly avoid British suppliers



This has hit manufacturing, agriculture, fishing, and food exports hardest.

2. Labour Shortages Are Hurting Key Sectors

Freedom of movement ended with Brexit. While this was a political goal, the economic impact has been severe.



Britain now faces shortages in:

Healthcare (nurses, doctors, carers)

Agriculture and food processing



Construction

Hospitality and transport



EU workers who once filled these jobs left or never came, and the UK has not replaced them fast enough. This has driven higher costs, lower productivity, and weaker services.



3. London’s Financial Power Has Been Eroded

London was once the undisputed financial gateway to Europe. Brexit damaged that role.

Banks and financial firms moved operations to Paris, Frankfurt, Dublin, and Amsterdam



The UK lost “passporting rights,” making it harder to sell financial services in the EU

Investment that would have come to Britain now goes directly to EU capitals

London is still important — but it is no longer dominant.

4. Investment Has Fallen Behind Other Rich Countries

Foreign investors prefer stability and access to large markets. Brexit introduced uncertainty.



UK business investment has lagged behind the US, Germany, and France

Companies delay or cancel expansion plans



Long-term growth has slowed

This has left Britain with low productivity, one of its biggest economic problems even before Brexit.


5. The Pound Is Weaker, Prices Are Higher

Since Brexit:

The British pound has lost value

Imports cost more

Inflation hit harder than in many comparable countries



Ordinary people feel this through:

Higher food prices

More expensive fuel

Rising household bills

Wages have struggled to keep up.



6. Political Isolation Has Grown

Britain is now outside the EU but still deeply affected by EU rules.

It must follow many European standards to trade — without having a vote



Relations with Ireland have been strained over Northern Ireland

Britain has less influence in global trade talks than promised

The idea of “Global Britain” has proven harder to deliver in practice.



SO WHAT CAN BRITAIN DO NOW?

Britain faces hard choices, not slogans.

Option 1: Repair Relations With the EU

Closer trade alignment

Reduced border friction



Easier movement for workers in key sectors This would boost growth — but requires political honesty.



Option 2: Accept Long-Term Economic Loss

Maintain distance from Europe

Rely on deregulation and trade deals elsewhere This risks lower living standards and continued decline.



Option 3: Rethink Brexit Itself

Some argue for re-joining parts of the EU system

Others push for full reintegration in the long term This remains politically explosive but economically significant.



THE BOTTOM LINE

Brexit did not create Britain’s economic problems — but it made them worse and harder to fix. The UK lost friction-free access to its biggest market, weakened its financial edge, and reduced its global influence.



The real question now is no longer whether Brexit caused damage — but how long Britain is willing to live with the consequences, and what it is prepared to do next.

BUYING ELECTRICITY UNITS IN BULK DOES NOT MAKE  THEM CHEAPER – ZESCO

zamobserver
-
0
BUYING ELECTRICITY UNITS IN BULK DOES NOT MAKE  THEM CHEAPER – ZESCO

BUYING ELECTRICITY UNITS IN BULK DOES NOT MAKE  THEM CHEAPER – ZESCO

By: Thomas Afroman Mwale

ZESCO has dismissed reports suggesting the implementation of higher electricity tariffs, attributing the rapid depletion of units to increased consumer demand and extended power supply hours.



The power utility explained that with stabilized and improved supply, electricity consumption has risen across residential, business, and commercial areas.



Reduced load-shedding has led to greater use of appliances such as stoves, geysers, freezers, and air conditioners, thereby accelerating unit usage.



ZESCO corporate affairs manager Rose Sibisi emphasized that electricity units are driven by consumption patterns, not tariff changes.



She noted that all tariffs are scrutinized and approved by the Energy Regulation Board (ERB) in a fair and transparent manner, adding that Zambia continues to maintain the lowest electricity tariffs in the region under the lifeline tariff system.



Speaking on Millennium Radio, Ms. Sibisi explained that the lifeline tariffs consist of three bands with varying costs.



She highlighted that electricity units carry tax implications, including 16% value added tax (VAT) and 4% excise duty, with the remaining revenue directed to ZESCO.



Ms. Sibisi also clarified that buying units in bulk does not make them cheaper.
#SunFmTvNews

$4 MILLION TO SUPPORT DISPLACED SENSELI JERABOS AS GOVERNMENT AWAITS NEW MINING SITE ALLOCATION

zamobserver
-
1

$4 MILLION TO SUPPORT DISPLACED SENSELI JERABOS AS GOVERNMENT AWAITS NEW MINING SITE ALLOCATION



By: Dina Soko

Government has released $4 million to assist approximately 4,000 small-scale miners, commonly known as Jerabos, who were displaced from the Senseli Open Pit Mine in Chingola.


Speaking during the handover ceremony, Mines and Minerals Development Minister Paul Kabuswe said the funds are intended to support the affected miners as they await allocation of an alternative mining site.


He emphasized that government remains committed to ensuring the Jerabos are resettled and able to continue their mining activities in a legal and orderly manner.
Mr. Kabuswe explained that the funds had already been taxed by the Zambia Revenue Authority (ZRA) and were securely held in an account, ready for distribution through duly recognized leaders and representatives of the small-scale and artisanal miners.


He noted that the financial support is a temporary measure designed to cushion the miners following their displacement.
In response, representatives of the Jerabos expressed gratitude to government for the gesture, describing the funds as timely relief.


They, however, appealed to authorities to expedite the process of identifying and allocating an alternative mining site so they can resume their work and sustain their livelihoods.

#SunFmTvNews

PRESIDENT HICHILEMA DONATES K276,000 TO MULENGA HILL SDA CHURCH, FOR COMPLETION OF CHURCH 

zamobserver
-
1
PRESIDENT HICHILEMA DONATES K276,000 TO MULENGA HILL SDA CHURCH, FOR COMPLETION OF CHURCH 

PRESIDENT HICHILEMA DONATES K276,000 TO MULENGA HILL SDA CHURCH, FOR COMPLETION OF CHURCH 



January 03, 2025

PRESIDENT Hakainde Hichilema has donated K276,000 towards the completion of Mulenga Hill Seventh Day Adventist Church, reaffirming his commitment to supporting faith-based institutions and national unity.



The donation was announced on behalf of the President by his Special Advisor for Political Affairs, Mr Levy Ngoma, who said the gesture reflects the Head of State’s desire to support the work of God through churches.



Mr Ngoma conveyed President Hichilema’s love and goodwill to the congregation, noting that churches play a key role in promoting moral values and social harmony.



Mr Ngoma said the President believes in the biblical principle of loving one’s neighbour, which he described as the foundation of peace and development.
He thanked the church for standing in prayer for the country during the debate of Bill 7 in Parliament, a period marked by tension and misinformation.



He said that despite the challenges, the bill was passed by a majority and the country remained peaceful. Mr Ngoma reaffirmed that President Hichilema is committed to upholding Zambia’s Christian values while respecting democratic processes.



On the Day of the Christian Nation, Mr Levy Ngoma revealed that in cementing the observance of the Christian Nation Day on 29th December 2025 last year President Hakainde Hichilema has maintained the day as a Christian observance and pledged that it should be strengthened and gazetted so that it becomes a holy day on which the nation can worship God and honour the day as a country.



In a vote of thanks on behalf of the Church Elder Mwanza expressed gratitude to President Hichilema for the donation delivered through Mr Ngoma. He said the church had struggled to raise funds for the ongoing construction works.



Elder Mwanza recalled that when President Hichilema congregated with the hurch on 13th August 2022, an appeal for support was made, and he assured the President that the funds would be used strictly for the intended purpose.

The Falcon

ACCOUNTABILITY IS NOT PERSECUTION — SEPARATING FAITH FROM THE RULE OF LAW

zamobserver
-
0
ACCOUNTABILITY IS NOT PERSECUTION — SEPARATING FAITH FROM THE RULE OF LAW

ACCOUNTABILITY IS NOT PERSECUTION — SEPARATING FAITH FROM THE RULE OF LAW



By Chilufya Kasonde

Father Augustine Mwewa’s reaction to the summoning of Archbishop Alick Banda by the Drug Enforcement Commission (DEC) raises serious concerns, not only about accuracy but also about the dangerous conflation of faith with personal accountability.



To begin with, the DEC did not “arrest” the Archbishop, nor did it summon the Catholic Church. It invited an individual, Archbishop Alick Banda, to appear before its Anti-Money Laundering Unit. In a constitutional democracy governed by the rule of law, such an action is neither extraordinary nor hostile. It is standard procedure when questions arise that require clarification. To frame this as “persecution” or a “war against the Catholic Church” is misleading and unnecessarily inflammatory.



The law in Zambia does not exempt clergy from scrutiny. Titles, collars, or ecclesiastical offices do not place anyone above the law. If anything, leaders entrusted with moral authority should welcome transparency, as it reinforces public trust. Accountability does not negate faith; it strengthens it.



Father Mwewa’s assertion that the Government has declared war on the Catholic Church is unsupported by facts. The Church continues to operate freely, speak openly, preach, publish pastoral letters, and critique government policy without restriction. Disagreement with government performance, whether on mealie meal prices, fertiliser, fuel, or load shedding, is a legitimate civic right. However, such policy debates must not be weaponised to shield individuals from lawful inquiry.



Equally troubling is the attempt to rally Catholics into a siege mentality. Encouraging believers to interpret a lawful summons as an attack on their faith risks polarising the nation and undermining institutions meant to protect all citizens, including church members. Zambia’s democracy thrives when institutions function independently, not when they are intimidated by public pressure or religious sentiment.



Prayer and unity are noble virtues, but they should never be presented as substitutes for accountability. One can pray and still cooperate with investigations. One can speak prophetically and still respect the law. These are not mutually exclusive.



Furthermore, invoking “cyber laws,” “mingalato,” and warnings of an impending crackdown creates fear rather than fostering truth. Such rhetoric shifts the conversation away from the real issue: a simple request for clarification by a lawful authority.



The Church has historically played a vital role in Zambia’s moral and social development. That role is best preserved not by politicising legal processes, but by upholding integrity, humility, and respect for the rule of law. Defending the Church does not mean defending every individual action taken by its leaders without question.



In the end, the strength of both the Church and the State lies in their willingness to submit to truth. Accountability is not persecution. Transparency is not intimidation. And justice, applied equally, is not an enemy of faith.

U.S. Military Action Against Venezuela Exposes the Dangers of South Africa’s Reckless Foreign Policy Rhetoric

zamobserver
-
0
U.S. Military Action Against Venezuela Exposes the Dangers of South Africa’s Reckless Foreign Policy Rhetoric

U.S. Military Action Against Venezuela Exposes the Dangers of South Africa’s Reckless Foreign Policy Rhetoric



Recent military action by the United States against Venezuela has once again pushed the long-simmering U.S.–Venezuela conflict into dangerous territory. While the focus of global attention remains on Washington and Caracas, the situation has also revived uncomfortable questions about South Africa’s own conduct and rhetoric in relation to this volatile standoff.



Not long ago, South Africa’s ambassador to Venezuela made remarks that shocked diplomats and observers alike. He openly suggested that South Africa should take military action against the United States and went further to claim that if war were to break out between the U.S. and Venezuela, South Africa would ensure that Venezuelans would not “die alone.” Although these comments were later withdrawn, they were never convincingly explained, nor were there visible consequences.



At the time, the remarks were dismissed by some as ideological grandstanding. Today, with real military action unfolding, they appear far more serious—and far more reckless.



A Conflict Decades in the Making

The hostility between the United States and Venezuela did not emerge overnight. Since the rise of Hugo Chávez in 1999, relations deteriorated sharply as Venezuela positioned itself as a vocal opponent of U.S. global influence. Under Chávez and later Nicolás Maduro, Venezuela accused Washington of interference, economic sabotage, and backing coups. The U.S., in turn, accused Venezuela of authoritarianism, human rights abuses, and dismantling democratic institutions.



Over the years, Washington imposed sweeping sanctions, particularly targeting Venezuela’s oil sector. Venezuela responded by deepening ties with U.S. rivals such as Russia, Iran, and China. The result has been a prolonged geopolitical standoff, punctuated by periodic crises—one of which has now escalated into direct military action.



Where South Africa Fits In

South Africa is not a neutral bystander in this story—but neither is it a meaningful strategic player.

Historically, South Africa’s post-1994 relationship with the United States has been economically vital. The U.S. is one of South Africa’s largest trading partners, a key investor, and a major destination for South African exports. Trade agreements such as AGOA have supported thousands of jobs in automotive manufacturing, agriculture, and industry.



Yet politically, relations have grown increasingly strained. The ANC’s liberation-era worldview, shaped by Cold War politics, often frames the U.S. as an imperial power. This has led South Africa to adopt positions that align rhetorically—though not materially—with governments hostile to Washington.



Venezuela is one such case. South Africa’s support for Caracas has largely been ideological rather than practical. There is no major trade relationship, no military alliance, and no strategic dependency. The solidarity expressed has been symbolic—rooted in anti-imperialist language rather than national interest.



Why the Ambassador’s Remarks Were Dangerous

Against this backdrop, the ambassador’s comments were not merely undiplomatic—they were destabilising.



South Africa:

Has no military capacity to confront or challenge the United States

Has no legal or treaty obligation to defend Venezuela

Faces severe domestic crises, including unemployment, energy instability, and poverty



For a senior diplomat to speak casually about military conflict suggested either a profound misunderstanding of South Africa’s position in the world—or a reckless willingness to sacrifice national interests for ideological posturing.



Even though the remarks were later retracted, international diplomacy does not operate on erasers. Words spoken by ambassadors signal intent, alignment, and credibility. Retractions do not erase the impression that South Africa’s foreign policy messaging has become incoherent and emotionally driven.



The Bigger Problem: A Foreign Policy Losing Its Bearings

The real issue exposed by this episode is not Venezuela, nor even the United States—it is South Africa’s increasingly erratic foreign policy posture.



Officially, South Africa claims to support:

Non-alignment

Peaceful resolution of conflicts

Respect for international law

In practice, however, its messaging often contradicts these principles. The ambassador’s remarks clashed directly with South Africa’s stated commitment to diplomacy and mediation, raising serious questions about internal oversight and strategic discipline within the Department of International Relations.



At a time of rising global instability, South Africa should be positioning itself as a credible, measured voice for de-escalation. Instead, episodes like this suggest a government struggling to separate historical ideology from present-day reality.



Conclusion

The U.S. military action against Venezuela is a reminder that global conflicts are not theoretical debates—they are deadly, complex, and fast-moving. In such a world, reckless rhetoric from diplomats is not harmless talk; it carries real consequences.



South Africa gains nothing from inserting itself—verbally or otherwise—into a confrontation between vastly unequal powers. What it risks, however, is significant: economic fallout, diplomatic isolation, and the erosion of its credibility as a responsible international actor.



The question South Africans must now ask is not whether the ambassador misspoke—but whether the government has fully grasped the danger of allowing ideology to override strategic judgment in a world where words can bring nations closer to war.

Oil Giant Chevron pledges to work with Trump as it cheers ‘peaceful’ power transition in Venezuela

webzed
-
1
Oil Giant Chevron pledges to work with Trump as it cheers ‘peaceful’ power transition in Venezuela

The Texas-based oil giant Chevron issued a statement Saturday vowing to work “constructively” with the Trump administration to support a “peaceful” transition of power following the U.S. attack on the South American nation and capturing of its president.

Chevron has maintained a presence in Venezuela for more than 100 years, and according to its statement, signaled a readiness to work in tandem with the Trump administration, which is set to run the government of Venezuela until a transition of power can be facilitated.

“With more than a century in Venezuela, we support a peaceful, lawful transition that promotes stability and economic recovery,” reads the statement from Chevron, the Houston Chronicle reported Saturday. “We’re prepared to work constructively with the U.S. Government during this period, leveraging our experience and presence to strengthen U.S. energy security.”

ALSO READ: Trump ignored this clear warning about reckless strikes and the disasters that follow

Chevron first established its presence in Venezuela in 1923 under the rulership of dictator Juan Vicente Gomez, who opened up Venezuela to foreign oil companies and subsequently secured strong support from the United States.

Chevron and other oil giants’ had largely unchallenged control over Venezuela’s oil reserves until the early 1940s after the government, under the leadership of Venezuelan President Eleazar Lopez Contreras, enacted the Hydrocarbons Law, which required oil companies to split their profits with the Venezuelan government.

Today, Venezuela has the single-largest proven oil reserves on earth, and a number of Republican figures, lawmakers, and even President Donald Trump himself have acknowledged that U.S. military threats against the country were motivated – at least in part – by its vast natural resources, and despite the Trump administration’s stated justification of combating drug trafficking.

The United States has enacted or sought to enact regime change countless times in South America over natural resources, perhaps most famously in 1973 when a U.S.-backed coup overthrew its democratically elected leader at the behest of American mining and communication companies that had been stripped of their control of Chile’s resources.

Trump says he partially deserves $50M reward for capture of Venezuelan president

webzed
-
0
Trump says he partially deserves $50M reward for capture of Venezuelan president

Following the unprecedented U.S. attack Saturday morning on Venezuela and subsequent capture of its president, President Donald Trump joked that he and other administration officials deserved the $50 million reward that his own Justice Department offered for information leading to the Venezuelan president’s arrest.

“He is a fugitive of American justice with a $50 million reward, which I guess we saved $50 million,” said Secretary of State Marco Rubio at a press conference in Florida, speaking of Venezuelan President Nicholas Maduro.

‘Make sure,” Trump added, standing alongside Rubio. “Don’t let anybody claim it! Nobody deserves it but us!”

The attack was announced by Trump early Saturday morning, with videos quickly emerging on social media of large-scale strikes raining down on Venezuela’s capital city, Caracas. Maduro was subsequently captured and is currently being transported to New York where he’s expected to face trial on drug-trafficking charges.

The DOJ increased its reward for information leading to Maduro’s capture from $15 million to $25 million in January of 2025, and up to $50 million in July.

At that same press conference, held at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort in Palm Beach, Florida, Trump made the stunning announcement that the United States would run Venezuela until a transfer of power could be facilitated, and said that he remained open to deploying American troops

US Lawmakers demand emergency vote to stop Trump war on Venezuela

webzed
-
0
US Lawmakers demand emergency vote to stop Trump war on Venezuela

Members of the US Congress on Saturday demanded emergency legislative action to prevent the Trump administration from taking further military action in Venezuela after the president threatened a “second wave” of attacks and said the US will control the South American country’s government indefinitely.

Rep. Greg Casar (D-Texas), chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus (CPC), said that “Congress should vote immediately on a War Powers Resolution to stop” President Donald Trump, whose administration has for months unlawfully bombed boats in international waters and threatened a direct military assault on Venezuela without lawmakers’ approval.

“Trump has no right to take us to war with Venezuela. This is reckless and illegal,” said Casar. “My entire life, politicians have been sending other people’s kids to die in reckless regime change wars. Enough. No new wars.”

Another prominent CPC member, Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.), said in response to the bombing of Venezuela and capture of its president that “these are the actions of a rogue state.”

“Trump’s illegal and unprovoked bombing of Venezuela and kidnapping of its president are grave violations of international law and the US Constitution,” Tlaib wrote on social media. “The American people do not want another regime change war abroad.”

Progressives weren’t alone in criticizing the administration’s unauthorized military action in Venezuela. Establishment Democrats, including Sen. Adam Schiff of California and others, also called for urgent congressional action in the face of Trump’s latest unlawful bombing campaign.

“Without congressional approval or the buy-in of the public, Trump risks plunging a hemisphere into chaos and has broken his promise to end wars instead of starting them,” Schiff said in a statement. “Congress must bring up a new War Powers Resolution and reassert its power to authorize force or to refuse to do so. We must speak for the American people who profoundly reject being dragged into new wars.”

Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.) said he will force a Senate vote next week on a bipartisan War Powers Resolution to block additional US military action in Venezuela.

“Where will this go next?” Kaine asked in a statement. “Will the president deploy our troops to protect Iranian protesters? To enforce the fragile ceasefire in Gaza? To battle terrorists in Nigeria? To seize Greenland or the Panama Canal? To suppress Americans peacefully assembling to protest his policies? Trump has threatened to do all this and more and sees no need to seek legal authorization from people’s elected legislature before putting servicemembers at risk.”

“It is long past time for Congress to reassert its critical constitutional role in matters of war, peace, diplomacy, and trade,” Kaine added. “My bipartisan resolution stipulating that we should not be at war with Venezuela absent a clear congressional authorization will come up for a vote next week.”

The lawmakers’ push for legislative action came as Trump clearly indicated that his administration isn’t done intervening in Venezuela’s internal politics—and plans to exploit the country’s vast oil reserves.

During a press conference on Saturday, Trump said that the US “is going to run” Venezuela, signaling the possibility of a troop deployment.

“We’re not afraid of boots on the ground,” the president said in response to a reporter’s question, adding vaguely that his administration is “designating various people” to run the government.

Whether the GOP-controlled Congress acts to constrain the Trump administration will depend on support from Republicans, who have largely applauded the US attack on Venezuela and capture of Maduro. In separate statements, House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) and Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) described the operation as “decisive” and justified.

Ahead of Saturday’s assault, the Republican-controlled Congress rejected War Powers Resolutions aimed at preventing Trump from launching a war on Venezuela without lawmakers’ approval.

One Republican lawmaker who had raised constitutional concerns about Saturday’s actions, Sen. Mike Lee of Utah, appeared to drop them after a phone call with Secretary of State Marco Rubio.

But Sen. Andy Kim (D-NJ) noted in a statement that both Rubio and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth “looked every senator in the eye a few weeks ago and said this wasn’t about regime change.”

“I didn’t trust them then, and we see now that they blatantly lied to Congress,” said Kim. “Trump rejected our constitutionally required approval process for armed conflict because the administration knows the American people overwhelmingly reject risks pulling our nation into another war.”

‘Betrayed his base’: MAGA in full revolt against Trump over Venezuela attack

webzed
-
1
‘Betrayed his base’: MAGA in full revolt against Trump over Venezuela attack

A number of prominent MAGA voices came out against President Donald Trump Saturday over his administration’s unprecedented attack on Venezuela, including one MAGA lawmaker who argued the attack had left “most Americans enraged.”

“Americans’ disgust with our own government’s never-ending military aggression and support of foreign wars is justified because we are forced to pay for it and both parties, Republicans and Democrats, always keep the Washington military machine funded and going,” wrote Rep. Marjorie Taylor Green (R-GA) in a social media post on X. “This is what many in MAGA thought they voted to end. Boy were we wrong.”

In conjunction with law enforcement, the U.S. military carried out an operation early Saturday morning to capture Venezuelan President Nicholas Maduro – indicted in the United States on drug-trafficking charges – that included large-scale strikes on the nation’s capital, Caracas. Trump later announced that the United States would “run the country” until a transfer of power could be facilitated.

The news was not met well with many in the MAGA movement, including prominent podcaster and MAGA influencer Candace Owens, who suggested the Trump administration had carried out the attack “at the behest of globalist psychopaths.”

“Venezuela has been ‘liberated’ like Syria, Afghanistan, and Iraq were ‘liberated,’ Owens wrote in a social media post on X. “The CIA has staged another hostile takeover of a country at the behest of globalist psychopaths. That’s it. That’s what is happening, always, everywhere.”

Rep. Ro Khanna (D-CA), while certainly not a member of the MAGA movement, has rhetorically supported some of the ideology that has been championed by many prominent MAGA supporters, particularly the opposition to military interventionism. And by that metric, Khanna argued, Trump had “betrayed” his supporters in greenlighting the attack on Venezuela.

“Donald Trump betrayed his MAGA base today launching a war of choice to bring regime change in Venezuela,” Khanna wrote in a social media post on X.

“We keep voting against dumb wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, & Libya. But our Presidents bow to a foreign policy blob committed to militarism. They get us entangled in conflicts abroad, while ignoring the lack of good jobs and high costs for Americans at home.”

Pastor Jamal Bryant Responds to People Criticizing His Wife’s “See Through” Dress

webzed
-
2
Pastor Jamal Bryant Responds to People Criticizing His Wife’s “See Through” Dress

Internet users who criticised a preacher’s wife for her attire have finally got their response, and surprisingly, it is not from the victim.

The wife of Pastor Jamal Bryant, Dr. Karri Bryant, came under public backlash after she wore a flesh-toned black outfit to the annual UNCF Atlanta Mayor’s Masked Ball on December 20, 2025, at the Signia by Hilton Atlanta.

The event was solely to raise funds for the United Negro College Fund, UNCF, to support the HBCUs and students.

As one of the biggest fundraising events in the USA, they raised $4 Million to support the students, but unfortunately, the media chose Dr Karri as their target for criticism because of her wear.

Dr Karri didn’t comment on the situation to not worsen it, but as a loving husband, Jamal stood up for his wife during his recent sermon at the New Birth Missionary Baptist Church in Stonecrest, Georgia (metro Atlanta area).

The pastor said most people who do not appreciate their bodies are the ones speaking ill of his wife’s dress, even though they lack fashion sense.

He stated that the cloth was a flesh-toned wear, which means the inner of the beal attire was made just to match Karri’s complexion, so it was a translucent cloth as people want it to look like.

Jamal stressed the positive outcome of the event they attended, which was the whopping amount of $4million, but people want to spread negativity.

According to Bryant, the public does not deserve his explanation, but he wants them to know he purchased and approved the dress for his wife.

Bryant ended by disclosing he wants his wife to always appeal to him so he will run home after his day, and so he will always ensure he looks great for him.

‘Vance kept away from Mar-a-Lago’: Report reveals VP’s role in Venezuela military Operation

webzed
-
0

After Donald Trump announced that the U.S. had captured the leader of Venezuela, there was some speculation about whether JD Vance was on the same page as the president. A new report answers that question.

Trump made the disclosure early Saturday morning that there was a military strike on Venezuela.

Hours later, Bloomberg published an article called “Vance, Trump Met Covertly Ahead of Strikes to Keep Secrecy,” in which the outlet reports, “Vice President JD Vance was kept away from Mar-a-Lago this weekend due to concerns his presence would signal upcoming strikes against Venezuela,” citing “sources close to the vice president.”

Bloomberg further continued:

“Vance and President Donald Trump met on Friday covertly to discuss details of the U.S.’s capture of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro, as the White House plans to temporarily ‘run the country.’ They met at the president’s golf club in West Palm Beach, but Vance was not at Mar-a-Lago on Friday evening due to security concerns, according to a spokesperson for Vance, who spoke on the condition of background.”

The report stated, “Vice President Vance was deeply integrated in the process and planning of the Venezuela strikes and Maduro’s arrest. He joined several late night meetings via secure video conference with National Security principals leading up to the operation. The Vice President briefly met with President Trump at the Trump golf club in West Palm Beach during the day Friday to discuss the strikes. The Vice President was not at Mar-a-Lago on Friday night, as the National Security team was concerned a late-night motorcade movement by the Vice President while the operation was getting underway may tip off the Venezuelans. The Vice President joined by secure video conference throughout the night to monitor the operation. He returned to Cincinnati after the operation concluded. Due to increased security concerns, the Administration has aimed to limit the frequency and duration of the Vice President and President being co-located away from the White House.”

Bloomberg’s Mica Soellner added, “Vance kept away from Mar-a-Lago this weekend due to fear of tip off to Venezuelans.”

“The VP – noticeably absent at Mar a Lago presser today – met w/ Trump at his golf club in West Palm Beach on Friday and monitored Maduro capture via video conference,” she added on social media.

Political analyst Rachael Bade characterized it as Vance’s team “giving color about his involvement in Venezuela operation.”

“If anyone thinks he may be on a different page than Pres Trump, think again,” she wrote. “He joined via conference call so the motorcade didn’t tip anyone off…”

Trump’s FIFA ‘peace prize’ called into question after Venezuela attack

webzed
-
0
Trump’s FIFA ‘peace prize’ called into question after Venezuela attack

Donald Trump in December was given a medal as he was awarded the FIFA Peace Prize, which some have dubbed a “participation trophy” for the president who has long coveted the Nobel Peace Prize, but even the backup award he received is being called into question after the U.S. captured Venezuela’s leader.

Trump early on Saturday morning announced a successful plot for the U.S. to capture the foreign leader and his wife. The president later announced his intention to have the U.S. “run” the nation.

The apparent imperialistic tendency of the president didn’t go unnoticed, with many noting that it flies in the face of the FIFA award.

Popular podcaster Tony Martin said, “I’m seriously starting to question the credibility of the FIFA Peace Prize.”

Media host Zack Guzmán weighed in with, “FIFA awarded Trump their first ever peace prize exactly 29 days before he bombed Venezuela.”

The widely followed satire account TheRealThelmaJohnson replied to Fox News’ post on social media with, “I’m starting to think Donald Trump doesn’t take the FIFA Peace Prize seriously.”

Former Republican joked, “Trump has been officially stripped of his FIFA Peace Prize,” and included an AI video of the medal being taken from Trump.

Sports journalist Leyla Hamed added, “FIFA, under Gianni Infantino, gave Trump its first-ever ‘Peace Award.'”

“Since then, Trump has bombed Nigeria, Somalia and Venezuela, and rolled out the red carpet for Netanyahu, the man responsible for the genocide in Palestine,” she added.

TV journalist Dan Walker said, “I am not pretending to be an expert on Venezuela but it is uncomfortable to watch world leaders trying their best not to criticise President Trump for steamrollering years of political procedure & precedent in removing Maduro and now claiming the US will ‘run’ the country.”

“FIFA might want to rethink the ‘peace prize’,” he added on Saturday.

Chinese mother jailed for accidentally killing daughter during ‘exorcism’ ritual

webzed
-
0

A court in southern China has handed a suspended jail sentence to a woman who accidentally killed her daughter while performing what she believed was an “exorcism” ritual at home, authorities said.

According to a report by the South China Morning Post, the court in Shenzhen, Guangdong province, sentenced the woman, surnamed Li, to a 3-year jail term suspended for 4 years in July. Her elder daughter, who took part in the ritual, received the same sentence. The judgment was delivered in July on charges of negligent homicide.

Prosecutors said Li and her two daughters had become deeply influenced by superstitious ideas involving telepathy and possession. They were convinced that demons were attacking them and that their “souls were sold”. In December last year, the younger daughter, surnamed Xie, suddenly said she was possessed and asked her mother and sister to perform an exorcism on her.

During the ritual, the duo applied force to the young woman’s chest and poured water down her throat to induce vomiting. At one point, the younger daughter reportedly said the ritual was effective and urged them to continue. However, the next morning, other family members found her unresponsive with bleeding from the mouth and called the police. Medical workers pronounced her dead at the scene.

The court ruled that while the mother and sister had no intention to kill and believed they were helping, their actions directly caused the victim’s death, amounting to negligence. Their cooperation with authorities and remorse were taken into account in sentencing.

How did social media react?
The case has triggered strong reactions on Chinese social media. “This is such a horrible and silly case,” one user wrote. Another said, “What kind of cult is this? Are we living in 2025?”

Others called for stronger science education and public awareness to counter superstitious beliefs. “Cult believers are usually stubborn. They think the demon was too strong rather than accept reality,” one commenter said.

Venezuelans around the world celebrate the capture of Maduro by US government

webzed
-
0
Venezuelans around the world celebrate the capture of Maduro by US government

Venezuelans across the world have taken to the streets to celebrate the capture of President Nicolás Maduro, who was flown out of the country and indicted in the United States on drug and weapons charges.

The development has sparked scenes of jubilation among Venezuelans at home and in the diaspora, many of whom say they were forced to flee the country due to years of violence, hyperinflation, gang activity, and shortages of food and medicine. More than eight million people have left Venezuela since 2014, leaving the nation with one of the largest displacement crises in the world, according to the United Nations.

Venezuela is also home to the world’s largest proven crude oil reserves, a resource wealth that contrasts sharply with years of economic collapse, mass migration, and political crisis under Maduro’s rule.

Following news of Maduro’s capture, crowds gathered in cities across Latin America, the United States, and Europe, singing, dancing, and waving Venezuelan and US flags. Many said the moment symbolised the collapse of what they described as a dictatorship.

One celebrant in Chile said, “I’ve come to celebrate because the dictatorship has fallen, Maduro’s drug trafficking has fallen. We are free and happy that the dictatorship has fallen and that we will have a free country.”

Another Venezuelan in Doral, Florida, said, “Today, justice is being served for all the Venezuelans who were forced to leave our country. We are fighters, entrepreneurs, and good people, and we want to return home to rebuild Venezuela.”

Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, were seized during a US military operation carried out in the early hours of Saturday in Caracas. Explosions, low flying aircraft, and columns of smoke were reported across the capital as the operation unfolded.

Speaking shortly after announcing the raid, US President Donald Trump described it as a “brilliant operation,” crediting extensive planning and elite troops. Asked whether Congress had been consulted before authorising the strike, Trump said the issue would be discussed later.

US officials say Maduro has long been under indictment for drug trafficking, dating back to 2020, when he was accused of conspiring to import cocaine into the United States. Rewards for information leading to his arrest reportedly rose as high as $50 million in 2025. Washington alleges Maduro leads a drug trafficking network known as the Cartel de los Soles, which it has designated a foreign terrorist organisation.

US Attorney General Pam Bondi said Maduro would soon “face the full wrath of American justice on American soil,” adding that multiple weapons charges accompany the drug counts.

Inside Venezuela, the reaction has been sharply divided. While many citizens celebrated, the country’s attorney general, Tarek William Saab, condemned the US operation, claiming civilians were killed or wounded and calling for peaceful protests. Venezuelan Vice President Delcy Rodríguez demanded proof that Maduro and Flores were alive, raising concerns over their condition following the raid.

Internationally, the operation triggered shockwaves. Russia, a close ally of Venezuela, expressed concern and suggested the United States may have violated international law by forcibly removing a sitting head of state. A Russian foreign ministry spokesperson called for immediate clarification of the situation.

Maduro, who has ruled Venezuela since 2013 as leader of the United Socialist Party, has been widely criticised by opponents and international observers, who accuse him of authoritarian rule, election manipulation, and overseeing the economic collapse of the country. His capture marks one of the most dramatic geopolitical events involving Venezuela in decades and has reshaped the political mood among millions of Venezuelans worldwide.

Maduro was captured by the US just after he met with Chinese officials

webzed
-
0
Maduro was captured by the US just after he met with Chinese officials

Venezuela’s president, Nicolás Maduro, was reportedly captured by US forces shortly after holding talks with Chinese officials in Caracas, according to accounts circulating from Venezuelan sources.

The incident is said to have occurred on January 3, following a ground operation by the United States that led to Maduro being detained and transported out of the country. Reports claim the operation came hours after Maduro met with a special envoy linked to Xi Jinping, as discussions were held on strengthening cooperation against US pressure.

According to Venezuelan local media and posts shared on Maduro’s official channels, the meeting took place at the Miraflores Presidential Palace and involved senior Chinese diplomats, including officials from China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Venezuela’s Vice President Delcy Rodríguez and Foreign Minister Iván Gil were also present at the talks.

The discussions reportedly reaffirmed China’s support for Maduro’s government amid escalating tensions with Washington and reviewed hundreds of existing bilateral agreements. China remains Venezuela’s largest crude oil importer and has invested tens of billions of dollars in infrastructure projects in the country since 2007.

The operation was said to have been directed by Donald Trump from Mar a Lago, following his declaration of an intensified “war on drugs.” China and Russia were reported to have opposed the US action through the United Nations, warning of its implications for international stability.

Observers say the development could significantly affect US China relations, especially after both sides agreed to a temporary easing of tensions during talks held in Busan last year. Trump is also expected to visit China in April at the invitation of President Xi, adding further weight to concerns about the diplomatic fallout.

1...149150151...1,120Page 150 of 1,120