Ambassador, I appreciate the sobriety of your concerns, but postponing the General Conference is the most dangerous mistake the Patriotic Front can make at this delicate moment. In politics, timing is not a detail — it is the battlefield itself. A party that loses time eventually loses purpose.
Every seasoned political scientist knows that internal elections delayed in moments of crisis rarely return. They become permanently deferred, constantly rescheduled, and ultimately replaced by prolonged factionalism. PF has already lived through years of uncertainty. Extending that uncertainty will not stabilise the party; it will bury it.
A party cannot hold the nation in suspense forever. Zambians are waiting for clarity, direction, and leadership. Every week of delay deepens public doubt. Every shift of the date signals indecision. The country cannot rely on an opposition that cannot organise itself.
Postponement may buy temporary peace, but it destroys long-term credibility. Parties collapse not because of one wrong leader, but because they fear to choose any leader at all. PF must choose — even if the choice comes with discomfort. As the elders say, a journey delayed does not shorten the distance.
We would rather lose the war than lose time. Wars can be fought again; time never returns. Leadership contests are not perfected by postponement — they are perfected by courage. PF must show courage now. The conference is not the problem; delaying it is.
If these elections are postponed, they risk never being held. New excuses will arise. New disputes will emerge. New factions will form. The party will drift into paralysis, and paralysis is the slowest form of death. The only medicine for uncertainty is decisiveness.
Hon. Lubinda, Hon. Mpankanta, and all contenders must recognise that leadership is not chosen in ideal moments; it is chosen in difficult ones. The ship cannot be steadied by staying at the harbour. It must sail — even in rough water — because motion itself creates direction.
Let the General Conference proceed. Let the delegates decide. Let the party breathe again. A party that delays choosing its leader becomes a party that has already chosen defeat. PF must not hesitate now. It must move, decide, and restore its place in the national imagination.
Let the decision to remove the six remain but reschedule conference in light of the high court orders-Joseph Willa Mudolo
Greetings Colleagues,
In my view, the pronouncements made by Hon. Given Lubinda still stand. Even if some believe they are incorrect, they cannot simply be dismissed by a select members of the Central Committee refusing to accept his directives. Hon. Lubinda exercised powers vested in him under the PF Constitution, and the ongoing misinterpretation of Article 51 and Article 61(j) does not remove the authority conferred upon him.
The truth is that we neither control the party nor can we behave as though the court injunction does not exist. Doing so would be a clear violation of the rule of law. Whether or not one believes the court order is flawed, we must respect it until it is set-aside.
These escalating divisions and emerging factions lack wisdom and objectivity—they are simply distractions. Our priority should be restoring the PF and resolving all outstanding issues, including matters before the courts.
I have requested the chiefs from Mafinga District to summon Hon. Chabinga, as their son, and assist in resolving the impasse through constructive dialogue. I will update you on the progress next week.
Colleagues, let us choose dialogue. Proceeding with a convention while a court order is in force would be illegal and completely against the rule of law. As aspiring leaders, we must lead by example and uphold the law.
WE DON’T EVEN KNOW IF LUBINDA’S FATHER IS ZAMBIAN, BUT HE WANTS TO IMPOSE HIMSELF AS PRESIDENT – MWILA
FORMER PF Secretary General Davies Mwila says Given Lubinda wants to impose himself as party president.
Further, Mwila wondered where Lubinda would get the votes when his origins are not known.
Meanwhile, PF faction acting Deputy Secretary General Brenda Nyirenda has wondered whether Lubinda had taken whiskey shots before making those appointments.
Lubinda, who is PF acting president, has made a number of changes to the party, removing Mwila, Nyirenda and party chairperson Emmanuel Mpankanta from the central committee.
In an interview, Saturday, Mwila wondered whether Lubinda’s father was Zambian, adding that he did not know where Lubinda would get the votes to win the party presidency.
“Did he appoint me or I was elected by the conference? He doesn’t have those powers. Me, I was elected by the general conference, I was not appointed by anyone, so, he doesn’t have those powers. If it has happened, because I’m not aware of that, he doesn’t have those powers, unless [the people] whom he appointed.
Some of us were elected by the general conference in 2021. He’s trying to impose himself. PF is a democratic party; presidents are elected, so him he wants to impose himself on the people, it will not help him. So, by removing people from positions he thinks it will help him, it will not. Let him just follow what people want, that’s all,” said Mwila.
“He’s a candidate, why is he still holding that position [PF acting president]. There must be fair play. Those are artificial wrangles, he wants to create those confusions himself, there’s no one interested in confusion because our members are anxiously waiting for a leader so him, he doesn’t want.
If he doesn’t want, let him wait for the members, they will tell him what to do. You can’t impose yourself on people. And moreover, even if he became president tomorrow, where is he going to get the votes from, we don’t know where he comes from, we don’t know whether it’s Western, whether it’s Central [provinces], we don’t know. We don’t know whether the father is Zambian or what, we don’t know. Where is he going to get the votes from, [he is] just wasting our time”.
Meanwhile, Nyirenda said Lubinda’s decision was illegal, null and void because he had no power to make such decisions.
“What Given Lubinda has done is illegal, null and void. The fact that he’s a presidential candidate, his powers ended the day he paid his expression of interest. He’s considered a candidate and for now, he should concentrate on going round the country so that he can garner votes because we are not backing out on the convention, on choosing a leader.
So my advice to our big man is that yes, it’s hot out there, he was attacked, but let him garner more courage to go out there and be able to speak to the electorates. If he can’t do it physically, let him try virtual meetings because we are ready to have a leader in place,” she said.
“So, ignore whatever he has said, maybe he could have taken one or two whisky shots, that’s what made him start making those pronouncements. They must have been coming out of some influence of alcohol, I don’t think it’s normal. If you ask him today, I think he has a different view. When you are standing firm on a position, other people may not like you, other people may react differently.
I’m a professional, I’m a lecturer, so for me, I believe in doing things in a straight way. What I have laid on the ground, from the time when I took over, after honourable Nakacinda was jailed, I set up that the time of when our business of not having a leader should come to an end because if we didn’t have that deadline then we were not going anywhere”.
She added that only the central committee could remove her from her position, not Lubinda.
“Any decisions to be made to fire any of us is supposed to be done by the central committee. So, if honourable Lubinda feels that I’m not worth holding this position, he should have floated it to the central committee, the 80 members should vote whether I should be removed from office or not. In the first place, he’s not even the one who appointed me, he’s just in an acting position.
My loyalty is to Edgar Chagwa Lungu, the person who saw quality in me and knew that I can be of value to the Patriotic Front so as at now, he’s an aspiring candidate. We are waiting upon honourable Mpankanta, who is our chairperson, [for] direction. The chair is going to give us what we are going to follow. Those decisions are coming out of whims or emotions, sometimes people don’t know how to hold up and how to deal with issues properly but I don’t blame him, he went through a lot when he was attacked,” Nyirenda said.
Nyirenda said that Lubinda’s decision might be as a result of him not being happy with the way she had been doing her work.
“So, for me, I believe that any organisation, for it to operate normally and be able to get the attention of the people outside, the way you organise yourselves matters. I’ve brought in the issue of proper organisation; we’ve set deadlines for them. Initially, they didn’t want to come out and show their interest, they just wanted to be bringing confusion but then I set out the aggregates to meet, say if we do this, by this time we should be able to do that, after we’ve done this, we’ll be able to achieve that. This morning, we are meeting actually, so that we can have a virtual meeting with our leaders out there because it’s becoming a bit of a challenge meeting them physically so that we can choose a leader,” said Nyirenda.
“We wanted to get information from the structures on how best, the best route that we can use to pick our leader. Who can arrest you virtually? We can be able to meet and be able to discuss and choose a leader, votes can come in. There are only a 156 constituencies and only 116 districts, we can be able to get that information within an hour, everything can be done so when you are coming in with new ways of doing things, those who have been old in the party may not like your ideas.
I can’t say maybe everyone else was happy with the route that we were taking. In fact, even for this central committee meeting, it wasn’t even my office that called for the central committee meeting, it was him who called for the central committee meeting, so we were supposed to finalise everything and all of a sudden he just wakes up in the night with some women holding a chitenge for him and makes that decision”.
WHY IS TASILA LUNGU STILL BEING PAID FOR FOING NOTHING AS A MEMBER OF PARLIAMENT FOR CHAWAMA CONSTITUENCY, LAURA MITI WONDERS
She Writes
When you think about it, Tasila Lungu should probably come back to work until the date of President Lungu’s burial is set.
There is no work place where anyone can be away for so long, and be paid. Unless, of course, they are unwell. Even with illness, halfpay, unpaid leave then separation on medical grounds, kicks in.
If Ms Lungu feels she must be in South Africa, until the empasse over her father’s burial is over, maybe she should take unpaid leave, if that facility exists with Parliament.
There is no justifiable reason why taxpayers should continue to pay a salary for a Member of Parliament, who is waiting for a burial that does not even have a date.
No human resource processes can justify this, especially that Tasila is an adult daughter and not a widow.
We are setting precedents here. Is what Tasila is being allowed going to be the standard for all MPs who have complicated personal situations.
The fact that her late father was the President, should not accord the Chawama MP special privileges
Surely, there is a point at which plain logic has to come into play, in this matter.
LET US DE-ESCALATE, REINSTATE THOSE REMOVED AND ACCORD RESPECT TO HON.GIVEN LUBINDA AS ACTING PRESIDENT
..postpone the General Conference to Drcember or January 2026 until we steady the ship and resolve these new internal issues and differences..
Sunday 23rd November, 2025
I’m still troubled by the criminal and brutal attack and abduction launched against Acting President Hon. Given Lubinda in Kabwe by thugs from the UPND and worried by the feeble response so far by the Police to arrest both the perpetrators and the accessory and instigators to the crime, such as Central Province Permanent Secretary, Milner Mwanakampwe.
I’m also shocked by the brutal attack made against Ndola Mayor, Jones Kalyati in Masaiti, who was waylaid by UPND thugs with the alleged help from Zambia Police officers deployed to disrupt and cancel a Patriotic Front in-door meeting held in Masaiti scheduled to be addressed by Hon. Lubinda.
However, my attention is drawn to serious issues that have arisen since Friday, 21st November 2025, in the Patriotic Front.
The Party was scheduled to hold a crucial Central Committee Meeting on Saturday, 22nd November 2025 to resolve outstanding issues such as:
1. Appoint an Electoral Commission to prepare and run the upcoming General Conference. 2. Scrutinise and approve a delegates’ list to the General Conference.
3. Approve mode of the General Conference (in-person, hybrid, or virtual).
Despite the preparations made and at the last minute, Acting President Hon. Given Lubinda suddenly suspended the Central Committee Meeting to a later date without any explanation.
This action was announced by a civil servant from the Secretariat, the Media Director, Mr. Edwin Lifwekelo.
This immediately drew sharp criticism from the Acting Secretary Hon. Brenda Nyirenda-Chisopa and Acting Chairperson, Hon. Musonda Mpankanta MP.
Intense debate arose in the MCC WhatsApp group expressing concerns that the sudden decision to postpone the Central Committee, without an explanation, was made in bad faith.
Some members stated that the decision was probably motivated by the threat of contempt as the Party had not succeeded to discharge the injunction obtained by expelled Mafinga MP, Robert Chabinga, a matter that before Judge-in-Charge of the Kabwe High Court, Judge Kelvin Hancubwili Limbani.
It must be stated that the threats of contempt of court as reason to suspend the meeting was immediately dismissed.
Despite the legal hurdles, and ss demonstrated in the past, we have always held meetings, recognising that the attacks on the Patriotic Front were engineered and perpetrated by the State and we have therefore defied any activities designed to stop the activities, programs and appointments by the leadership of the Party and its members.
So the court process or threats of contempt has never been a reason or fear to stop our meetings, work, and activities.
Later, we saw announcements made by the Acting President, Hon. Given Lubinda, to remove from the Central Committee ; Hon. Musonda Mpankanta, Hon. Brenda Nyirenda, Hon. Davies Mwila, Hon. Christopher Shakafuswa, Mr. Chomba Chipili, Mr. Abyud Kawangu, and Mr. Tombi Tombi.
These actions aggravated the crisis in the Party to a deeper level.
I have since come to understand that the action by Hon.Lubinda was made to prevent what would have turned out to undermine his leadership and a negative agenda against the Party and to help forestall discipline in the Party.
Further, it is within his powers to call or postpone any meeting using available information or circumstances before him.
On Saturday, we saw the press conference and later the so-called Central Committee held by Hon. Mpankanta and attended by some members.
It must be noted that the powers to call and hold the Central Committee are vested in the President, and this meeting was therefore illegal.
The Chairperson of the Party has powers but those powers kick-in at the General Conference where he chairs the General Conference.
For this reason, I wish to advise Hon. Mpankanta to disown and denounce the meeting he held as it is not supported by the law and was merely reactionary and defiant to the decisions made by the Acting President.
It must also be noted that the decisions made by Hon. Lubinda are within his powers and discretion as Acting President.
However in light of the fragile state that the Party finds itself in, and in light of the circumstances we find ourselves in, we must immediately de-escalate the crisis and activate dialogue to resolve these contentious issues and commit to dialogue.
We must remember that we have been united, resolute and determined to fight the invasion by the State and its surrogates deployed against our Party.
We therefore must not lose that strength and determination and we have remained focused on the larger agenda to reclaim power from the oppresive UPND.
If not careful, we risk opening a second front or so-called third faction, if we sustain the actions meted against the Chairperson of the Party, yhe Acting Secretary General and others, a matter which will instantly weaken our party further.
I therefore appeal to Acting President Hon. Lubinda to reinstate those removed from Central Committee, for the sake of unity of purpose.
I also appeal to the President and to the Central Committee to immediately postpone the General Conference scheduled for 29th November 2025 and posibbly to end of December or January 2026.
Further, we should use this period to bridge the emerging gaps, reginr issues of the Conference such as to consolidate the delegates’ list and appointment of an Electoral Commission that will run the General Conference.
I also appeal to the leadership and Party members at large to support the calls made by the OASIS Forum and the Church to participate in nation-wide protests and demonstrations against the ill-timed constitutional-making process.
If Bill 7 or the Draft Constitution succeeds, it will spell doom to our Democracy and threaten the holding of credible, free and fair elections in 2026.
Therefore I appeal to our Members of Parliament to effect the calls to initiate a Petition in Parliament to obtain signatures against Bill 7 or the proposed Draft Constitution, to demonstrate that the Bill is ill-fated and will not enjoy a majority vote and therefore destined to fail.
Zambia’s Renewed Momentum, led By President Hakainde Hichilema Is Setting The Pace For Africa
By Dr. Chris Patricks & Tara O’Connor
Zambia is once again proving that disciplined leadership, transparent governance, and credible economic management can transform a struggling nation into a rising regional model.
The journey from the turbulence of the previous decade to the stability seen today is neither accidental nor cosmetic. It is the product of deliberate reforms, consistent policy direction, and a political administration that understands the fundamentals of national recovery.
What was once described as Zambia’s New Dawn is now emerging as a new national trajectory, one that stands out across a continent wrestling with political upheaval, economic shocks, and weakening institutions.
Across many African regions, turmoil continues to define the landscape. West Africa remains locked in the grip of coups and political reversals. Some parts of East Africa continue to struggle with conflict and humanitarian pressures.
Southern Africa faces historic inflation, deteriorating state utilities, collapsing currencies, and governance failures. Yet amid this, Zambia presents a refreshing counter narrative.
It has become a story of discipline, credibility, and cautious optimism anchored on measurable progress.
The transformation has been neither loud nor theatrical. It has been methodical. In the last few years, Zambia has stabilised its macroeconomic fundamentals after a period marked by reckless borrowing, opaque procurement, political intimidation, and financial mismanagement.
When President Hakainde Hichilema assumed office, he inherited an economy that had defaulted on debt, a currency in freefall, institutions weakened by patronage, and public confidence at its lowest in recent memory. Today, the contrast is striking across every sector of national life.
The country’s debt restructuring achievements have been central to this renewed momentum. The successful realignment of obligations with both bilateral and commercial creditors has opened fiscal space that had previously been eaten up by unsustainable repayments.
Zambia is no longer navigating blind within its macroeconomic environment. Instead, it has a clear, credible framework for long term management of its debt and expenditure
This alone has significantly boosted investor confidence, allowing the economy to breathe again after years of suffocation under fiscal irresponsibility.
Inflation, once spiralling into double digits, has been stabilised through disciplined monetary measures and responsible fiscal management.
The Bank of Zambia has restored its credibility as an independent institution focused on safeguarding economic fundamentals.
As inflation slows, cost predictability has improved, easing pressure on households and boosting business confidence.
Where the previous administration relied heavily on political interference and artificial interventions, the current environment has returned to rule based management of the economy.
The kwacha has also displayed encouraging strength. Its recent gains are not cosmetic. They are driven by improved foreign exchange inflows, higher mining production, increased agricultural export earnings, and a stronger balance of payments position.
The currency is responding to supply and demand dynamics rooted in real economic activity, not politically engineered short term measures.
A stable and strengthening currency remains one of the clearest signals of a recovering economy, and Zambia is beginning to send that message consistently.
The mining sector, the backbone of Zambia’s economy, has experienced renewed life after years of stagnation and policy inconsistency.
Investors who had grown wary of unpredictable tax regimes and political interference are returning with confidence. Mining houses are expanding operations, reopening previously stalled projects, and injecting new capital across both copper and emerging critical minerals.
Zambia is positioning itself as a key player in the clean energy transition, with cobalt, nickel, and manganese drawing significant global interest.
This renewed investor appetite is a direct consequence of transparent policy, predictable tax frameworks, and restored confidence in the rule of law.
Beyond mining, agriculture, tourism, manufacturing, and renewable energy sectors are registering expanding activity. Zambia’s political stability, improved governance environment, and commitment to fighting corruption have become major factors in growing long term investment interest.
The Anti Corruption Commission, no longer under political capture, has resumed meaningful work by pursuing high profile cases that were previously shielded by political patrons.
Governance reforms of this nature have strengthened institutional trust and enhanced Zambia’s global standing.
Social services have also registered measurable progress. The recruitment of thousands of teachers and health workers has eased long standing pressure on the two sectors.
Free education has increased enrolment and unlocked opportunities for children from low income households. Health facilities have received stronger budget support as wastage and unnecessary expenditure have been curtailed.
Beyond this, macroeconomic stability has allowed government operations and social programmes to function without the instability that often disrupts service delivery.
Zambia’s global standing has improved significantly. The country is now viewed as a dependable partner, a responsible borrower, and a predictable investment destination.
International institutions, global lenders, and private investors recognise Zambia as a country that is rebuilding responsibly.
Transparency, discipline, and professionalism have become the hallmarks of the New Dawn’s economic diplomacy. The result is a nation returning to both continental and global relevance
As the 2026 elections draw closer, the political environment reflects an interesting truth. While the opposition remains fragmented, ideologically inconsistent, and burdened by the legacy of its recent past, the government is approaching the election cycle with a strong balance sheet of achievements.
Stability has returned, institutions have regained independence and international confidence has been restored. The economy is on a credible recovery path. Investor interest is rising and corruption is being tackled.
Education and health systems have been revived. Mining production is expanding. The currency is strengthening. These gains matter to voters who vividly recall the economic and political turmoil that characterised the previous era.
Zambia’s renewed momentum is no longer in question. It is a measurable national reality. The country has reintroduced itself to the world as a nation capable of serious governance and disciplined economic management.
The New Dawn has matured into a new direction for the country, one that places Zambia on an upward trajectory at a time when many nations across the region are facing decline.
In a continent where progress is often slow and instability widespread, Zambia stands out as a symbol of what can be achieved when leadership is guided by integrity, discipline, and a commitment to national interest.
The positive economic indicators, improving currency performance, renewed investor confidence, and stronger institutions all point to a country firmly on the rise.
Zambia is once again setting the pace for responsible governance in Africa, and its renewed momentum could very well shape the future of its democracy for many years to come.
Dr. Chris Patricks is Associate Professor in the Department of Political Sciences and Director of the Centre for Mediation in Africa. He also publishes on multilingualism in higher education and journalism studies. He is a former award-winning journalist.
Tara O’Connor is MD of the pan-African consulting firm Africa Risk Consulting. She is a University of Cape Town graduate and has spent 25 years assessing Africa’s political and business environment.
FORMER FOREIGN AFFAIRS MINISTER HARRY KALABA REVEALS DETAILED REASONS FOR HIS RESIGNATION
FORMER Minister of Foreign Affairs and current Citizens First party president Harry Kalaba has disclosed, in greater detail, the circumstances that led to his resignation during the previous Patriotic Front administration.
Mr Kalaba said he stepped down because of what he describes as abuse of power by senior government officials, particularly ministers who, according to him, had shifted away from late President Michael Sata’s pro-poor leadership principles.
Speaking during on the Kenny T 1 on 1 podcast, Mr Kalaba said that after President Sata’s death, government priorities changed under his successor, the late former President Edgar Lungu.
He alleged that some ministers had become directly involved in government contracts and tenders, including those at institutions such as ZESCO and the Road Development Agency (RDA).
He said he viewed this as a serious abuse of public office and raised the issue with President Lungu both in writing and in person.
According to Mr Kalaba, the matter escalated during a United Nations General Assembly trip to New York.
He said President Lungu called the ministers involved to a breakfast meeting where Mr Kalaba openly repeated his concerns in their presence.
Mr Kalaba added that he later renewed his intention to resign during another international trip to Ghana for the country’s 60th Independence Anniversary celebrations.
Mr Kalaba officially resigned in January 2018, citing rising corruption and the loss of pro-poor focus within government.
It’s not load shedding – just electricity shortages!
Part One In the last decade of UNIP, 1981–1991, I went from 11 to 21 years old. I saw firsthand queues for bread at the then Kabulonga Supermarket (building opposite Centro Mall). On our way from school at Lusaka Girls, we also witnessed queues often for sugar, soap, mealie meal, and cooking oil at the building below Hot FM Radio in Longacres, which was known as Mwaiseni Stores back then. Even as a child, the irony was not lost on me because Mwaiseni translates as welcome in Bemba.
Mwaiseni Stores was part of ZIMCO, a group of government companies where my father worked.
Most conversations among adults back then were always about essential commodity shortages. The lucky ones were those with relatives in Zambia Airways and on government trips. They sometimes had apples, chocolates, Coca-Cola, and butter.
There were no dollars to import the above as the government said they were reserved only for critical sectors such as health and fuel and other very essential imported items.
The population was less than eight million by 1991, with electricity consumption peaking in 1988 at 1083kWh per person. However, by 1991, the stress of population growth and increased economic activity began to show, and kWh consumption per person dropped to just over 700. We have not done much better since, with less than 1040kWh per person in 2023. For comparison, WB reports show that wealthy countries are at close to 10,000kWh per person in electricity consumption.
The population growth continues at just under 3% annually, while investment in electricity production has been minimal over the years.
Recently, ZESCO announced that it has connected over 200 megawatts to new housing since 2021. That is equivalent to over a million incandescent bulbs and more, if I am not mistaken.
On the other hand, industries that require power in agriculture, mines, manufacturing, and services have grown by quantum leaps.
And if that was not putting enough stress on an already overstretched electricity infrastructure, new internet media technology such as mobile phones, laptops, iPads, PlayStations, and other gadgets in hospitals, schools, and the service sector, etc., have made electricity demand for both personal and business use even worse.
What was once a class identity, ‘ku mayard kuli malaiti’ (standardized spelling), has now become an essential commodity for all citizens, whether in urban or rural areas, as well as in all businesses from the small salon which once used charcoal to heat the hot comb to straighten hair and boiled water for shampoo and set pa mbaula (often left italicized or in quotes for non-local readers), to bakeries, mobile money and other ICT businesses, processing firms, and the final elephant in the room, the mines.
We have no load management—just electricity shortages. It is an essential commodity in high demand, and supply is not meeting demand.
The problem is that now it is difficult to differentiate household needs from industry due to the growth of the service sector supported by the ICT platforms. There are many small businesses doing business with only their phone. As such, power is needed by both big and small businesses.
What can be done?
Since 2015, households have been advised to seriously consider self-supply through solar, generators, and inverters. However, it took a while for most people to believe demand for this essential commodity was growing much faster every day compared to supply.
I recall visiting my cousin in Six Miles in 2014, and he already had solar. At that point, I wondered why he chose to live so far away from ZESCO lines. Well, the rest is history because most houses now, no matter where they are located in Zambia, have a mixed supply, including mine.
The shortage has nothing to do with exports. Apart from a few firm exports, such as 40 MW in 2015 to Namibia, most power can only be exported when load demand has eased through the Southern Power Pool. At least, that was always my understanding.
The challenge has always been the high demand during peak times, which in today’s economy with popular businesses such as bars and restaurants, and need for many household gadgets needing power all day, there are very few non-peak hours remaining in a day and night.
We have a shortage of an essential commodity: electricity.
While households must continue with mixed supply, ingenuity in financing solar panels, inverters, and even generators is needed. Added to this is the cost of fuel, which at all costs (no pun intended) must be addressed as an essential commodity, too, in terms of pricing. We need cheap fuel to grow the economy.
Back to electricity.
We all agree there is a shortage. This means a solution must be the number one priority.
The government would do well to lay out a comprehensive plan for investment in base load—hydro and coal—which must be shared with citizens, with specific timelines, costs, and investors, so that we can all appreciate its efforts, and when the problem will be alleviated in the medium and long term.
It is this lack of clear information on solutions that is causing anxiety in the nation. There is currently no essential commodity problem as crucial as this one. It is time to implement over capacity in electricity generation.
THE OASIS FORUM HAS COMPLIED WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE PUBLIC ORDER ACT FOR ITS NOVEMBER 28 PLANNED PROTEST TO STATE HOUSE
On the 10 of November 2025, Oasis Forum notified the Police of its intention to march from Freedom Statute to State House on Independence Avenue to protest Government’s rushed, non-inclusive and election centred Bill 7 constitutional reform anchored by the technical committee.
The notification was served on the Inspector General of Police at Police Service Headquarters after the Commissioner of Police in charge of Lusaka province refused to receive the notification.
The March past on Friday 28 November 2025 is part of the planned activities by Oasis Forum against Bill 7, others being the court petition which has been filed in the constitutional court against the current process, open letter to the President which was also delivered to state house on 11th November 2025 and the Black Friday campaign which encompasses honking, wearing black ribbons and displaying black car disks.
Additionally, the Oasis Forum’s campaign against Bill 7 includes letters addressed to each and every member of Parliament urging them to r vote against any ensuing Bill so that the people’s will is not frustrated. Oasis Forum has also circulated a public petition against Bill 7 calling on citizens to sign the petition to be presented to President Hakainde Hichilema and Parliament to signify the public’s rejection of bill 7.
The Oasis Forum calls on citizens to come forward in numbers and assemble at Freedom Statue for the planned March past to State House on Friday 28th November 2025 against Bill 7.
Yours faithfully, For and on behalf of The Oasis Forum Beauty Katebe Chairperson – The Oasis Forum
The Dateline gives you a timeline and sequence of events across the political landscape. It is meant to champion clarity and misinformation.
22:37 HOURS, FRIDAY — LUBINDA PULLS THE TRIGGER
A quiet Friday evening turned into a political earthquake when Acting PF President Given Lubinda released a late-night video, firing senior party figures with immediate effect. He cited Article 61(J) of the PF Constitution as his legal basis. Brenda Nyirenda, Musonda Mpankata, Melessiana Phiri, former SG Davies Mwila and four provincial chairpersons were removed. Jean Kapata was elevated to Acting National Chairperson. Miles Sampa and Celestine Mukandila were appointed Deputy Secretary Generals.
Within minutes, PF WhatsApp groups went into full crisis mode. What sounded like a decisive reshuffle was read as a declaration of war.
EARLY HOURS, SATURDAY — THE BASE ERUPTS
The PF grassroots woke up to the announcement and split instantly into three distinct blocs:
1. The Mundubile camp, seeing the purge as a targeted strike on its core organisers.
2. The Makebi bloc, claiming this confirmed long-standing suspicions of internal sabotage.
3. The Lubinda loyalists, arguing his decisions were pure discipline.
Accusations of tribal undertones also emerged, with fringe voices claiming Lubinda was “too close to the Zambezi axis” and “compromised by UPND.” The rhetoric hardened as dawn broke.
EARLY SATURDAY AFTERNOON — MPANKATA STRIKES BACK
Lupososhi MP and PF Chairperson Musonda Mpankata publicly rejected Lubinda’s announcements, calling them “illegal, null and void.” Standing with Jonas Shakafuswa and Davies Mwila, Mpankata accused Lubinda of abandoning the soul of the party and acting out of “personal ambition and survival.” He delivered the sharpest line of the weekend: “The Acting President should have handed over instruments of power to the SG and Chairperson. He has failed.”
He announced that he would convene a Central Committee meeting himself.
SATURDAY AFTER 16 — CENTRAL COMMITTEE MEETS WITHOUT LUBINDA
For the first time since PF’s 2021 humiliating defeat, a Central Committee meeting was held without the acting party president. Led by Hon. George Chisanga, the committee agreed that Lubinda acted outside his authority. Preparations for the General Conference were reaffirmed.
They resolved:
– A neutral electoral commission must be appointed.
– A delegate register must be approved.
– A venue must be agreed upon.
– Lubinda’s decisions have no constitutional backing without ratification.
A political split inside the Central Committee is now official. Some members supporting Lubinda didn’t attend this meeting, arguing it’s illegal.
21:32 HOURS, SATURDAY — NEW INFORMATION EMERGES
A highly placed PF insider wrote to editor.peoplesbrief@gmail.com claiming Lubinda reacted partly because of alleged involvement of Davies Mwila in financing youths linked to the Kabwe brutality. Again, this cannot be verified. Seven suspects are in custody. UPND cadres are blamed by most factions. The truth remains unclear. But the rumour has deepened mistrust inside PF.
⬆️ SUNDAY MORNING — A PARTY IN FREEFALL
By sunrise, three parallel chains of command had formed:
– Mpankata’s team preparing to run the convention without Lubinda.
– Lubinda’s allies insisting he remains acting president.
– Mundubile strategists plotting a formal mechanism to remove Lubinda before the General Conference.
– Chabinga is preparing another media briefing this week. Old guards loyal to Lungu, including Mwila, are meeting privately to consolidate an anti-Lubinda push.
The PF Lubinda enclave is now operating with three centres of factional bases, a constitutional vacuum, and a convention only seven days away.
The biggest irony? As our reader Haggai Muzeya reminded us, PF has never held a true elective convention. Not under Sata. Not under Lungu. Voice votes. Pangas. Choirs. And declarations from the podium. History may repeat itself.
A tsunami is building. If Lubinda refuses to step back, PF may enter its first real convention already fractured beyond repair. If Mpankata proceeds, Lubinda may disown the outcome. Chabinga may issue a fresh injunction.
The courts may be asked to decide legitimacy again.
LET’S RESOLVE THE CRISIS BY DIALOGUE-GREYFORD MONDE
Fellow Zambians, members of the Patriotic Front, and all patriots who believe in a united and prosperous Zambia
The recent developments within the leadership structures of our great Patriotic Front party, marked by issues of indiscipline and internal disagreements, are deeply regrettable and pose a serious threat to the unity and cohesion of the party.
As someone who has dedicated years to serving this movement and our nation, I find these events profoundly disheartening.
Yet, I remain firm in my conviction that there is no challenge without a solution.
This moment, too, can and must be overcome through dialogue, maturity, and a shared commitment to the greater good.
As we approach the General Conference, it is imperative that the party leadership remains highly consultative, transparent, and resolute in pursuing unity of purpose. The Patriotic Front does not belong to any individual, faction, or clique.
It belongs to every member across the length and breadth of our country. Every decision we make must, therefore, reflect the collective will, aspirations, and interests of the general membership.
It is the earnest desire of Patriotic Front members from Lusaka to Solwezi, from Chipata to Mongu, from Livingstone to Chinsali, that our party emerges from the forthcoming General Conference stronger, more united, and fully prepared to deliver the change our people desperately need.
In light of this, I respectfully call upon the party leadership to urgently convene a Central Committee meeting to openly address and resolve all perceived differences in a spirit of brotherhood and mutual respect.
I further appeal to the Council of Elders to intervene decisively and impartially, helping to bridge any divisions and realign all groupings behind our common vision and goal.
The hopes of millions of suffering Zambians rest squarely on the Patriotic Front.
It is our sacred duty to set aside personal egos, ambitions, and grievances and to do what is right for the party and the nation at this critical juncture.
To the grassroots members who are the true owners and backbone of this party:remain calm, steadfast, and united. This storm shall surely pass. Together, we will weather it and march onward to resounding victory in 2026. Zambia shall be saved. The Patriotic Front shall rise stronger.
Hon. Greyford Monde Patriotic Front Presidential Aspirant
CHANCES OF UPND WINNING 2026 WILL BE SLIM IF LOADSHEDDING PERSISTS
By: Hope Nyimbili
The Zambia Restoration and Development Group has challenged the New Dawn government, warning that if it does not address the issue of electricity power cuts, its chances of winning the 2026 elections will be slim.
Founder Lazarous Mushibwe told Konkola Radio News that providing only three hours of electricity is a mockery, especially when some people are going without power for days.
He has called on the government to publicly acknowledge its failures, saying this will negatively affect its chances of winning the 2026 general elections. #SunFmTvNews
ZAMBIA POLICE TO CONTINUE DENYING RALLIES OVER SECURITY CONCERNS
THE Zambia Police Service says it will continue denying requests to hold political rallies whenever there are security concerns.
this follows the decision by police in Mufulira to deny the Socialist Party permission to hold a rally today at Red Star ground in Kamuchanga, citing national security concerns arising from recent incidents in Chingola during President Hakainde Hichilema’s visit to the area.
Speaking to Phoenix News, Zambia Police Public Relations Officer Godfrey Chilabi has advised political parties not to politicize police decisions, as they are made in the interest of everyone’s safety.
He has emphasised that it is the duty of the police to maintain law and order nationwide, and that when officers determine a rally cannot be held safely, they will act accordingly and deny permission or advise when such an event can take place.
LUBINDA ACCUSED OF MANIPULATION, SABOTAGE AND SELFISHNESS AS PF REJECTS HIS APPOINTMENTS AND DISMISSALS
By: Thomas Afroman Mwale
The opposition Patriotic Front (PF) faction has accused its acting president, Given Lubinda, of giving up the soul of the party in what it has described as a desperate act of political survival and selfishness.
PF national chairperson Musonda Mpakata charged that Mr. Lubinda’s decision to immediately change party leadership structures just seven days before the convention amounts to manipulating the playing field for other candidates even before the whistle is blown.
Speaking at a media briefing, Mr. Mpakata said Mr. Lubinda’s actions amount to drama, division, and sabotage disguised as administration.
He explained that the PF constitution does not grant an acting president the authority to effect leadership changes without Central Committee ratification.
He therefore rejected the dismissals and appointments, describing them as illegal.
Mr. Mpakata advised the former Justice Minister to relinquish the position of acting president to avoid abuse of power and to hand over leadership to the chairperson and the acting secretary general, which he said would create a level playing field for all participating candidates.
Meanwhile, Lusaka Province chairperson Christopher Shakafuswa described the development as a minor setback that would not shake the party. He emphasized that the PF would choose maturity over ego.
This comes barely 24 hours after acting PF faction president Given Lubinda appointed Matero MP Miles Sampa and lawyer Celestine Mukandila as deputy secretary general for mobilisation and politics, and deputy secretary general for administration, respectively, following the dismissal of senior party members. #SunFmTvNews
SUPPORT GIVEN LUBINDA TO STEER THE SHIP, DEAL WITH INDISCIPLINE, HE HAS DONE WELL SINCE 2021
Given Lubinda is one of the most experienced leaders Zambia has. Is been a politician for more than 40 years and served as a member of Parliament for 20 years. Given Lubinda is equally one of the oldest PF member of the central committee. The man has best leadership style especially when there’s Criss in the environment. He has a straight record in Criss management, strategic leadership and effective communication.
My simple advice to him is that:- please if possible dialogue with other leaders so that together you form government next year.
Given Lubinda is been a politician for more than 40 years. 20 years as an MP. Imwe 4 years old in parliament and you wanted to underestimate him?
You may not like him but this man has contributed much to our legal frame work, infrastructure development, policy formulation and social development.
Don’t forget that more than half of his lived life is been a politician. His true leadership is manifested when there’s Criss
Withdraw Bill 7: When Trust is Broken, even Good Intentions Cannot Save a Bad Process A Weighing In By Rev Walter Mwambazi So, this morning I learned via Ichengelo Radio that the Catholic Church shall be joining all “well meaning” citizens for a peaceful protest against the current constitutional amendment process dubbed “Bill 7” on the 28th November and shall be marching to State House to probably present their position.
This isn’t good and where I have been generally silent, I have been compelled to weigh in and share my position—withdraw the Bill.
I’ve watched the push for Bill 7 with a heavy heart. On paper, it looks tidy: expand parliamentary seats, introduce proportional representation, harmonize terms, and tweak by-election and nomination procedures. These sound technical and even progressive. But constitutional reform isn’t just about the content – it’s about the spirit, the process, and the trust that binds a nation to its laws. And that trust has been squandered in this case. Allow me to explain.
What Bill 7 seeks to change Bill 7 proposes a limited set of amendments branded as “non-contentious.” The headline items include:
Expansion of seats: Increasing the number of elected Members of Parliament, tied to recent constituency delimitation exercises. Proportional representation: Introducing a mixed-member system aimed at improving representation for women, youth, and persons with disabilities (similar to DEI – which I don’t subscribe to)
Nomination rules: Clarifying or revising how candidates can re-file nominations after resignations. By-election procedures: Adjusting the mechanics of by-elections to align with other electoral processes. Nominated MPs: Revisiting the number and conditions of nominated Members of Parliament. Term harmonization: Aligning the tenure of Parliament with local councils for administrative consistency.
Individually, none of these scream crisis. Together, however, they demand a process that is credible, slow enough to listen, and broad enough to include the country’s moral and civic conscience.
Why the process has lost legitimacy Several leading institutions – our churches, the Law Association, and civil society bodies – have stepped back, refusing to participate in the government’s committee tasked with gathering submissions nationwide. Their refusal isn’t apathy; it’s protest. It’s a statement that the process is not worthy of the Constitution it seeks to touch.
Law Association of Zambia (LAZ) Council of Churches in Zambia (CCZ) Evangelical Fellowship of Zambia (EFZ) Zambia Conference of Catholic Bishops (ZCCB) Civil Society Constitution Agenda (CiSCA) Allied NGOs, including ActionAid Zambia Oasis Forum
When those who traditionally safeguard the public interest won’t lend their legitimacy, the rest of us should pause. The committee’s mandate and tempo have not inspired confidence, and the optics are unmistakable: this is a process many believe is designed to deliver a result, not discover a consensus.
The core objections – and why they matter Critics have offered reasons that go beyond political preference. They strike at the ethics of reform:
Predetermined outcome: Many believe the path is scripted, and public input is decorative rather than decisive. Rushed and narrow consultation: Timelines and formats make meaningful engagement difficult for ordinary citizens and serious stakeholders. (strongly agree) Avoidance of deeper reforms: Labeling changes as “non-contentious” sidesteps structural issues the public has repeatedly raised.
Politicization risk: The impression is that amendments are timed and trimmed to serve electoral strategy rather than national interest. Historical déjà vu: The shadow of the failed Bill 10 looms large – partisan, opaque, and ultimately rejected by citizens and Parliament alike. These aren’t minor quibbles. They’re fault lines that tell us the foundation is compromised.
The Bill 10 parallel we cannot ignore Unfortunately, we’ve been here before. Bill 10 failed because it didn’t earn trust. It was seen as elite-driven rather than people-driven, more interested in outcomes than in listening. Bill 7 may be narrower in scope, but it has inherited the same deficit: a lack of legitimacy rooted in process. If the people feel unheard, if civil society feels sidelined, if the churches feel disrespected – then even good ideas are viewed with suspicion.
Constitution-making is not a technical project; it is a covenant. Covenants collapse when trust is broken. My Position: Withdraw Bill 7 Trust is the most important currency in constitutional reform. Once it’s spent carelessly, the market closes – ideas, even good ones, cannot find buyers. The perception around Bill 7 is now overwhelmingly negative. Whether through missteps, poor communication, or politicized framing, the government has lost the confidence required to carry such an exercise forward.
My conclusion is clear: Bill 7 should be withdrawn. Withdrawal is not defeat; it can be an act of wisdom. It can clear the air, reset the relationship with citizens, and open the door to a genuinely inclusive process – one that begins with listening, proceeds with transparency, and ends with a document that we can all own.
If the previous paragraph shall be adopted, whoever will raise this again can utilize my proposal on what a credible path would look like as outlined below. If we truly want reform, we must rebuild TRUST first. Here’s how that happens. ✍ Reset the mandate: Define the reform scope with citizens, not just cabinet. Begin with a white paper and a consultation calendar. ✍ Independent facilitation: Establish a broadly trusted, multi-stakeholder commission with balanced representation from churches, LAZ, academia, civil society, youth, and persons with disabilities.
✍ Public-first engagement: Host accessible provincial forums, publish minutes and draft changes openly, and allow time for critique and revision. Note: This is on right now, but they skipped the first two and so lost credibility from the start. Nothing will work if credibility is lost. ✍ Transparent timelines: Share a realistic roadmap and stick to it; avoid pre-election compression that breeds suspicion. ✍ Safeguard against politicization: Require cross-party and civil society consensus thresholds on key provisions before they even reach Parliament.
These steps are not cosmetic. They rebuild the covenant by restoring voice, dignity, and agency to the people. The call beyond politics This isn’t about who wins in 2026. It’s about who we are as Zambians. Constitutional reform should deepen our unity, not fracture it; amplify our representation, not exploit it; and strengthen our democracy, not game it. If the process cannot command trust, it should not proceed. Withdraw Bill 7. Then start again—slowly, humbly, and together.
GEZILE TO APPEAR IN COURT OVER CYBER HARASSMENT AND HUMILIATION CASE
Details in the statement…..
The Zambia Police Service has formally charged and arrested Gezile Smith Mwale, aged 23, of Ibex Hill, Lusaka, for offences of Prohibition, Humiliation, and Harassment contrary to Section 22 of the Cyber Crime Act No. 4 of 2025.
The arrest follows a report made on November 21,2025 around 13:00 hours by Abigail Mutale, aged 28, also of Ibex Hill, who complained that she had been subjected to repeated humiliation and harassment on a social media platform.
Preliminary investigations reveal that between November 1 and November 21, 2025, the suspect allegedly went live on her TikTok account, disseminating false information and publishing an image of the complainant. The material circulated is alleged to have harmed the complainant’s reputation and exposed her to public ridicule, humiliation, and embarrassment.
Following these allegations, police apprehended and detained the suspect. She was subsequently warned and cautioned, and later formally charged and arrested in accordance with the provisions of the Cyber Crime Act No. 4 of 2025.
The suspect has since been released on police bond and is scheduled to appear in court soon.
The Zambia Police Service urges members of the public to exercise responsibility, respect, and restraint when using social media platforms.
Online conduct must uphold the dignity and rights of all individuals. Any misuse of digital platforms to harass, humiliate, or harm others will be addressed in accordance with the law.
Issued by:
Godfrey Chilabi Public Relations Officer #SunFmTvNews
HON. LUBINDA’S LEADERSHIP SHINES THROUGH ADVERSITY
We strongly condemn the deplorable attack on Hon. Given Lubinda in Kabwe, an affront to the fundamental principles of democracy and human rights.
Such acts of violence are unacceptable and have no place in our society. Under Hon. Given Lubinda’s leadership, we assure the Nation that such barbaric behaviour will not be tolerated, and we will continue to promote a culture of peace, tolerance, and respect for all individuals, regardless of their political affiliation
We take this opportunity to counsel our young people to respect their elders and leaders, regardless of their political persuasion. This is a critical aspect of our cultural heritage, and we must preserve it at all costs. We must work together to build a society that values respect, tolerance, and peaceful coexistence.
The recent incident in Kabwe has, however, highlighted Hon. Given Lubinda’s exceptional leadership qualities, demonstrating his ability to navigate complex situations with poise and composure. His steadfast response has sent a powerful message to the nation, showcasing the strength and character required for effective leadership in Zambia’s dynamic political landscape. This is the kind of leadership that inspires confidence and trust, and we are proud to have him as one of our leaders.
Hon. Lubinda’s vision for Zambia’s future has resonated well with many, particularly his focus on revitalising the agriculture sector and promoting economic stability. These critical areas have the potential to drive meaningful change and improvement in the lives of Zambians, and his emphasis on transformative approaches could lead to increased food security, job creation, and sustainable economic growth. We believe that with leaders like Hon. Lubinda, Zambia can achieve great things and become a model for development in the region.
As Zambia moves forward, the emphasis on unity and development is a welcome trend. The country’s progress is intricately linked to the ability of its leaders to bring people together, foster dialogue, and drive collective growth. We must continue to work together, putting aside our differences, to build a brighter, more harmonious future for all Zambians, one that balances economic prosperity with social cohesion and environmental sustainability.
Hon. Lubinda’s leadership is a significant factor in Zambia’s development trajectory, and his commitment to the nation’s growth is evident. As the country looks to the future, it is essential to have leaders who can inspire, motivate, and unite the people towards a common goal of prosperity and progress. We have no doubt that Hon. Lubinda is one such leader, and we pledge our continued support for his vision for a better Zambia.
PRESIDENT HH HAS CHOSEN PRUDENCE OVER POLITICAL POPULARITY ON THE ELECTRICITY SITUATION.
Zambia’s current electricity crisis did not emerge overnight, nor is it the result of neglect or indifference. It is the culmination of years of structural dependence on hydropower, a dependence that has become increasingly precarious as the country faces repeated climate shocks. Today, President Hakainde Hichilema has made a difficult and deeply unpopular decision—one that reduces electricity access for households at a time when frustration is understandably high. But for all its immediate discomfort, it is the only logical and permanent path that can protect Zambia’s economy, safeguard lives, and secure the country’s long-term energy future.
For decades, Zambia’s energy system has been anchored on hydropower. This choice made sense historically: water sources were abundant, hydro plants were cheaper to construct, and—most importantly—they provided stable baseload power essential for national grid stability. But the droughts of 2017/18 and again in 2023/24 have drastically reduced water inflows into major reservoirs like Lake Kariba. As a result, hydropower plants are now operating at some of their lowest capacities in history.
By November 2025, Zambia’s actual electricity generation had fallen to about 1,469 MW against a national demand of roughly 2,600 MW, creating a crippling deficit of more than 1,000 MW. With such constrained generation, ZESCO was forced to implement emergency Stage 11 load management, leaving households with an average of only three hours of electricity per day.
The instinctive response from many citizens is understandable: if we are generating over 1,400 MW locally and importing 238 MW, why can’t ZESCO simply allocate at least six consistent hours of power to households? The answer lies in the fundamental structure of Zambia’s economy and the nature of industrial operations. Mines, water treatment plants, hospitals, schools, and other critical infrastructure require firm, uninterrupted power. Mines in particular cannot be switched off even for twenty minutes without risking catastrophic flooding and loss of life.
These operations power the economy, generate revenue, sustain jobs, and keep the country functioning. Their continuous power needs are non-negotiable. The domestic sector receives power mostly when mines are less active—typically at night—because imports too are typically available during those hours when Zambia’s regional neighbors are consuming less.
In such a situation, one might argue that Zambia should simply import more electricity and shield households from the worst effects. But that path, though politically attractive, is fiscally reckless. Importing large amounts of power at high cost would plunge ZESCO back into dangerous indebtedness—the very trap the country has been working to escape. It would compromise the long-term viability of the utility, weaken the broader economy, and ultimately leave the nation more vulnerable.
President Hichilema has chosen prudence over political convenience, recognizing that the sustainability of the power sector is more important than temporary popularity. Few leaders would opt for such a path, yet it is precisely this tough, sober decision that will safeguard Zambia’s future.
The good news is that this crisis is not permanent, and the solutions are already unfolding. Zambia is moving rapidly to diversify its energy mix, reduce overdependence on hydro, and build a resilient system capable of withstanding climate shocks. Significant solar projects are nearing completion, with over 500 MW expected on the grid by the end of 2025. By the second quarter of 2026, this figure should rise to about 1,000 MW from solar alone. These additions mark a transformative shift, bringing clean, climate-resilient power into the system at an unprecedented rate.
New thermal generation is also coming online, leveraging Zambia’s substantial coal deposits in Southern and Muchinga provinces. Maamba will add 300 MW by the second quarter, and Goli will contribute another 150 MW, bringing thermal additions to 450 MW. Combined with solar, Zambia could have more than 1,000 MW of new capacity by mid-2026—enough to eliminate domestic load shedding and restore export capability.
This mix matters. Hydropower and thermal sources provide a stable baseload that anchors the grid, while solar—particularly rooftop solar for households—can reduce pressure on the system and empower consumers. For this reason, ZESCO’s push to encourage rent-to-own solar solutions for domestic homes is not just wise; it is essential. As the country industrializes and aims to double its generation capacity to 10,000 MW by 2030, a diversified energy portfolio will drive mining expansion, support agriculture, and fuel manufacturing growth.
Zambia stands at a crossroads where short-term sacrifice is the price of long-term stability. Choosing not to take on more debt, choosing to protect the mining sector and other critical infrastructure, and choosing to accelerate sustainable energy investments—all these decisions reflect responsible governance rather than political calculation. Yes, this period is painful. Yes, businesses and households are suffering acutely. But it is a once-off pain, a temporary hardship that shields the country from far worse consequences down the line.
By June 2026, with new solar and thermal generation fully integrated, Zambia’s electricity supply will improve dramatically. Domestic load shedding can be eliminated, blackouts will become far less frequent, and the nation can return to exporting power instead of scrambling to import it. When that moment arrives, many will look back and recognize that President Hichilema’s difficult choice—unpopular though it may be—was the turning point that allowed Zambia to secure permanent energy stability.
Today’s sacrifice is the foundation of tomorrow’s prosperity. In time, Zambians will appreciate that this path, though hard, was the only logical one—and the only one that ensures a brighter, more secure future for the nation.
“DUDULA TRIES TO BLOCK WORLD LEADERS ‘BECAUSE THEY’RE FOREIGNERS’ — MEMBERS BEAT POLICE IN G20 CHAOS”
Police have opened cases of public violence and assault on officers after a violent confrontation with Operation Dudula members outside the G20 Summit venue. Several protesters were arrested as the situation rapidly spiralled out of control.
Witnesses say some Dudula members physically attacked police, shoving and hitting officers who were trying to maintain order. The group openly declared that they were blocking foreign nationals — including world leaders arriving for the G20 — claiming they had no place at the summit “because they are foreigners.”
In their attempt to disrupt the event, Dudula members tried to forcefully stop diplomats, delegates, and international guests from entering the venue, turning a global gathering into a tense security standoff. Police had to move in quickly to protect attendees and restore order.
The incident has sparked public outrage, with many questioning how far the movement is willing to go and what this means for South Africa’s image on the world stage. Police say investigations continue and more arrests may follow as footage is reviewed.
You have to be a top-class clown to spend your time fighting foreign nationals who are in your country legally. There is no problem with opposing illegal immigration, we all agree it is a crime. But to waste your energy abusing people who are in your country legally, while the state of affairs in your own country is like this, shows a level of foolishness that defies logic.
This is what you should be angry about. Not foreign nationals who are in South Africa legally, not waiters, not shopkeepers, not gardeners, but the fact that after 30 years of freedom, Africans own only 4 percent of the farms in their own country.
While you are busy harassing fellow Africans at traffic lights, the real beneficiaries of South Africa’s economy are sitting comfortably on 72 percent of the land.
It is tragic to then collaborate with some fringe organisations to fight against Africans who are legally in South Africa.
WHAT WE MEAN WHEN WE SAY LOADSHEDDING WILL BE A THING OF THE PAST
Progress on 600MW Thermal Power Plant Project in Sinazongwe
Government is pleased to announce that the 600MW thermal power plant project in Sinazongwe, Southern Province, is progressing satisfactorily, with construction activities underway.
Evergreen Energy Company Limited, a joint venture between Wonderful Group and United Capital Fertilizer Zambia Company Limited, is undertaking the project.
Upon completion, expected by mid-2026, the project is anticipated to significantly contribute to the country’s energy security and economic development.
The initiative is expected to create employment opportunities for thousands of Zambians, both during the construction phase and in permanent positions once operational.
Government reaffirms its commitment to supporting projects that align with the country’s energy diversification strategy and focus on renewable energy sources, and assures stakeholders of its continued support for this vital project.
Information and Media Director Spokesperson Mr. Henry Kapata has more in the video:
China Just Proved It Can Withstand Full U.S. Pressure: And Still Has Plenty More Gas In The Tank
China just demonstrated, openly, decisively, that it can take the full force of American economic aggression and respond with even greater power.
This wasn’t a stalemate. This wasn’t a cautious balance. This was China showing it can match and overwhelm U.S. pressure when it chooses to.
And Beijing did it without breaking a sweat.
1️⃣ China absorbed massive U.S. tariffs, then applied heavier pressure of its own
Trump tried to relaunch his trade war with tariffs over 140%. China didn’t blink.
Instead, Beijing countered with:
– A total halt of rare earth exports to the U.S. – A global licensing regime requiring China’s approval for any product containing even trace amounts of rare earths. – Targeted retaliation precisely where U.S. industry is most vulnerable.
This was not symbolic. This was not reactive. It was execution of a plan years in the making.
When the U.S. pushed hard, China pushed harder and Washington hit its limit first.
2️⃣ China showed it controls the industrial chokepoints America depends on
Rare earths were only one weapon.
China still dominates:
– Pharmaceutical ingredients for dozens of critical U.S. drugs – Battery, EV and solar manufacturing – Critical mineral refining – High-end industrial inputs the U.S. can’t source elsewhere
In other words: The U.S. fired its biggest shot. China answered with one tool and still has a whole arsenal untouched.
That is what a real power shift looks like.
3️⃣ Trump folded, repeatedly, because the U.S. had no meaningful counter
After China’s first rare earth strike:
– Trump backed down and lifted tariffs in May – When Beijing escalated again in October, Trump froze
– He shelved every serious countermeasure – Washington fell back on symbolic tariffs that Beijing had already neutralised – Then came Busan, where Trump cut tariffs again and offered concessions
By then, the fight was already over. China dictated the rhythm. The U.S. responded from a position of weakness.
4️⃣ Only after China won did Trump frame Busan as a “G2” moment
Trump tried to spin the Xi summit as a “great power duet,” but the reality was obvious.
He arrived at the summit having:
– Dropped tariffs – Abandoned sanctions – Suspended export controls – And conceded ground in advance
The so-called “G2” was not partnership. It was a rescue exit from a trade war the U.S. started, mismanaged and lost.
5️⃣ China walks away stronger. The U.S. walks away exposed
After all the shouting and all the chest-beating.
China leaves with:
✔ Proof it can force the U.S. to retreat ✔ Global recognition of its supply-chain dominance ✔ Renewed leverage over pharmaceuticals, minerals and manufacturing ✔ A clear demonstration of peer-power status
The U.S. leaves with:
❌ Weaker export restrictions ❌ Reduced tariffs ❌ A nervous alliance network ❌ And the realisation it cannot fight the supply chains it outsourced
This wasn’t “managed competition.” This was a strategic victory.
Even American analysts admit it:
“If historians mark a moment when China became America’s geopolitical equal, it might be Trump’s failed trade war.”
Equal? China and the U.S. aren’t equal.
6️⃣ The real headline?
China proved it can take America’s hardest economic punch and still has plenty more in reserve.
The United States, meanwhile, showed its vulnerability for the whole world to see.
The balance of power didn’t shift quietly over decades. It shifted loudly, publicly and unmistakably, in 2025.
US President, Donald Trump escalated his criticism of Nigeria on Friday night, November 21, publicly branding the country “a disgrace” as he renewed accusations that the government is failing to protect Christians from extremist violence.
Speaking on a conservative radio program, Trump repeated his threat to take potential military action against Islamist militants in Nigeria if the government does not take “do more” to stop attacks on Christian communities.
“Nigeria is a disgrace. The whole thing is a disgrace,” Trump said. “They’re killing people by the thousands. It’s a genocide, and I’m really angry about it. And we pay, you know, we give a lot of subsidies to Nigeria. We’re going to end up stopping.”
Trump’s comments reinforce the administration’s narrative that Christians in Nigeria are being uniquely targeted, a claim that has gained significant traction in right-wing circles in the US. This perspective is applied despite the country’s complex history of ethnoreligious conflict in which both Christians and Muslims have suffered mass casualties from various armed groups and terrorists.
The President’s broadcast came just one day after US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth met with Nigeria’s National Security Adviser, Nuhu Ribadu, at the Pentagon. The high-level meeting was aimed at reinforcing the Trump administration’s claim that Christians in Nigeria are facing “horrific violence.”
Hegseth posted on X that under President Trump’s leadership, the Defence Department (referred to by the administration as the “Department of War” or DOW) is “working aggressively with Nigeria to end the persecution of Christians by jihadist terrorists.”
A subsequent statement from the Defence Department confirmed that Hegseth and Ribadu discussed “tangible progress” on curbing violence against Christians and combating jihadist groups operating in West Africa.
Kanye West said he didn’t k!LL anyone — they k!ll£d his m0m instead so they could never control him.
“They can control Shaq, Charles Barkley, LeBron James, Jay-Z, and Beyoncé, but they can’t control me… My mama was sacrif!c£d… In Hollywood, a lot of people come up missing. They want to monetize and tr@umatized.”
So there it is — nobody can disregard these things as conspir@cy theories anymore. S@tanic Hollywood is crumbl!ng from the top down.
Do you agree that Hollywood is ev!l and that he can’t be controlled❓
Burkina Faso’s Parliament Approves Nuclear Agreement With Russia
The ad hoc bill, signed on June 19 in Saint Petersburg, was unanimously adopted by the Burkinabe Transitional Legislative Assembly.
This document paves the way for:
construction of civil nuclear infrastructure; transfer of technology and expertise; training of Burkinabe executives (several are already in Russia); safe management of radioactive waste; development of nuclear power in healthcare, agriculture, and industry.
With electricity access rates stagnating at just 34.2% in 2024, this strategic partnership with Russia’s Rosatom is reportedly a concrete and ambitious response to the country’s chronic energy deficit.
Paul Pogba: After the final whistle, he kneeled down, kissed the pitch, and with his eyes closed—holding back tears—he began to give thanks for being able to return to the field after a 2-year suspension.
The most emotional moment of the year is seeing Paul Pogba play again.
You did it, Pogba 凉❤️.
Paul Pogba Makes Emotional Return After Over Two Years
More than two and a half years since his last appearance on the pitch, Paul Pogba has finally made his long-awaited comeback — a moment filled with raw emotion and gratitude.
At the final whistle, the midfielder dropped to his knees, visibly overwhelmed as he soaked in the magnitude of the moment after such a long and difficult journey back to competitive football.
His words, “ALLAHU AKBAR… Alhamdulillah 爐”, reflected deep thankfulness and faith, marking a powerful end to an unforgettable return.
WHEN BIG POWER FORGETS ITS NEIGHBOUR: “South Africa, Lesotho — and the Hypocrisy of Voice”
By Masitise Seleso | Global African Chronicles
23rd November 2025
There is something invigorating about plain talk. In diplomacy, the gloss of good manners can too often mask raw realities. Yet when someone speaks frankly, you know where you stand. That clarity is precisely what is needed in a discussion about South Africa’s relationship with Lesotho — and the deeper irony now emerging as President Cyril Ramaphosa rails against global bullying.
For years, Lesotho has lived in the long, imposing shadow of Pretoria. Encircled entirely by South Africa, the Basotho nation is geographical theatre for power dynamics played out in economic leverage, border control, and political influence. It is not naïve to call this what it sometimes feels like: bullying.
South Africa may argue it is a benevolent neighbour — a generous elder brother facilitating cross-border trade, labour migration, and regional cooperation.
But generosity loses all virtue when it comes with strings attached, when respect is filtered through dominance, or when the voice of the smaller state is muted. Lesotho is no vassal, and it should not be treated as one.
This week’s geopolitical moment should resonate deeply with Basotho ears. At the G20 Social Summit hosted in Johannesburg, Ramaphosa delivered a defiant message: South Africa “will not be bullied” (Africanews). In a sharp jab at the United States, he declared that “it cannot be that a country’s geographical location or income or army determines who has a voice and who is spoken down to” (eNCA).
Let that sink in: a president of the region’s powerhouse arguing that power must not determine dignity, that size must not silence sovereignty. “There should be no bullying of one nation by another,” he said (TRT Afrika). Ramaphosa went further, insisting that all nations are “equally important to the global agenda” (IOL).
The force of his words is undeniable. When a country speaks up for itself on the global stage, it sends a message — not only to external powers but also to its neighbours. And for Lesotho, that message should prompt urgent self-reflection: if South Africa refuses to be bullied by the United States, shouldn’t it also examine how it treats its immediate neighbour?
The painful contradiction is this: South Africa champions equality abroad but often isolates Lesotho at home. If Ramaphosa genuinely believes that geography shouldn’t silence a nation, then why, in regional practice, does Lesotho sometimes feel excluded?
In instances of major summitry or regional engagement, South Africa is quick to invite countries with which it shares little more than diplomatic niceties — yet its closest neighbour is often overlooked. To be bypassed by your neighbour when they extend a global platform is not just diplomatic oversight; it feels like a deliberate snub.
This is not hypothetical. The regional imbalance in influence is real. Lesotho’s strategic value — politically, culturally, geographically — often receives short shrift. Rather than being a full partner in discussions about regional development or continental cooperation, Lesotho is too often treated as an afterthought, while more distant states secure prime invitations.
The outcome is deeply unfair. By failing to extend the courtesy of genuine partnership to Lesotho, South Africa undermines its own moral posture. How can it bellow against bullying on the world stage while potentially perpetrating it at home? For the Basotho, the consequences are more than symbolic. When big summits unfold without a meaningful seat for Lesotho, Basotho eyes are rightly narrowed.
Is this oversight, or a subtle reminder: proximity does not guarantee prominence. Sovereignty is not just about borders — it is about voice, agency, and respect.
Ramaphosa’s rallying cry against bullying should not be a one-way street. It must reverberate across his own region. If he proclaims that no country should be spoken down to, then he — and South Africa — must apply that principle in practice, not just in rhetoric. Lesotho should not be reduced to an appended neighbour but treated as a sovereign state with equal dignity.
Refusing to include Lesotho in critical forums or summits weakens regional solidarity. It undermines trust. It signals that South Africa is comfortable projecting power — unless that power challenges its own sense of hierarchy. For smaller states like Lesotho, this model is deeply troubling.
A better model would prioritise inclusivity. When South Africa hosts international forums, it should regard Lesotho not as a fringe actor but as a vital regional stakeholder. Invitations and platforms must reflect geography, history, and mutual interest, not just political convenience.
Accountability is also key. If South Africa truly rejects coercion on the global stage, it must scrutinise its internal dynamics. If dominance is exercised in its backyard, can it honestly claim to stand for equality? Moral consistency demands more than grand speeches — it demands structural change.
Finally, solidarity must extend to neighbours, not only to equals on the world stage. Ramaphosa’s defiance in the face of external pressure is commendable, but regional solidarity requires humility, listening, and respect. Lesotho deserves no less.
The US’s treatment of South Africa mirrors, in a sense, how South Africa treats — or bullies — Lesotho, much as Israel does with Palestine.
The lesson is clear: fairness and frankness are qualities worth valuing, even in tricky situations. If Ramaphosa will not be bullied by the United States because of geography or income, then he must not allow geography to silence Lesotho either. Sovereignty is something defended internationally and upheld at home.
The Basotho have earned their voice; it is time Pretoria recognises that — not out of charity, but out of principle.
When the big brother speaks of resisting coercion, he must also examine how he wields power next door. True leadership lies in treating all nations — close or far — with equal respect. That is not just diplomacy. It is justice!
Suspect with toy gun shot after attempted hijacking of G20 vehicle
A suspected carjacker was wounded on Friday evening, 21 November 2025, after attempting to hijack a vehicle assigned to G20 summit operations.
The vehicle was being used by members of the South African Police Service’s National Intervention Unit (NIU), who were patrolling around Johannesburg as part of intensified security for the global event.
According to SAPS, the suspect leapt into the roadway along Empire Road and pointed what appeared to be a firearm at the driver, unaware that the occupants were NIU officers. One officer fired a shot, striking the suspect in the upper body. He was later taken to hospital under police guard.
Police confirmed the weapon used was an imitation firearm. Under the Firearms Control Act, using a replica gun during the commission of a crime is treated as a serious offence, including attempting to mislead a victim into believing it is real.
The suspect will face charges of attempted hijacking once medically cleared.
“SA MEN TRAPPED IN UKRAINE WAR ZONE AFTER ‘TRAINING PROMISE’ — NOW TOLD TO STOP CRYING AND FIGHT”
What started as a promise of “security and bodyguard training” has turned into a nightmare for 17 young South African men who now find themselves stuck on the front lines of the Russia-Ukraine conflict — scared, exhausted, and begging to come back home.
Families say these men left South Africa believing they were going for professional training and better opportunities. But the moment they landed abroad, the story allegedly changed. Their phones were seized, they were made to sign contracts in a language they didn’t understand, and within days they were transported straight into a live combat zone in the Donbas region.
Now, instead of the training they were promised, they are facing drones, shells and freezing conditions — with no proper military experience.
To make it worse, when they pleaded for help, one of the commanders reportedly mocked them, telling them to “stop whining to your mothers and pull up your balls.”
These are South African citizens — not trained soldiers — thrown into a foreign war they never signed up for. Their families back home are terrified, the South African government is investigating, and diplomatic pressure is rising as the truth of how they got there continues to unfold.
This story is a warning to every young person desperate for opportunity: not everything that looks like a “training program” is what it seems.
KENYAN AUTHORITIES PAID TROLLS TO THREATEN GEN Z PROTESTERS, AMNESTY SAYS
MORE than 100 people were killed during the protests, rights groups say The Kenyan authorities paid a network of trolls to threaten and intimidate young protesters during recent anti-government demonstrations, Amnesty International has said.
A new report by the human rights organisation said government agencies also employed surveillance and disinformation to target organisers of the mass protests, which swept Kenya across 2024 and 2025.
The demonstrations were driven largely by “Gen Z” activists who used social media platforms to mobilise.
In response to Amnesty’s report, Kenya’s interior minister said the government “does not sanction harassment or violence against any citizen”.
But Amnesty said it had uncovered a campaign to “silence and suppress” the protesters.
Young women and LGBT+ activists were disproportionately targeted, with misogynistic and homophobic comment, as well as AI-generated pornographic images, the report said.
The BBC has approached the government for further comment.
One activist told Amnesty: “I had people coming into my inbox and telling me: ‘You will die and leave your kids. We will come and attack you’
“I even had to change my child’s school. Someone sent me my child’s name, the age… the school bus number plate. They told me: ‘If you continue doing what you’re doing then we will take care of this child for you’.”
It has long been believed that the government employs a network of individuals, known as “keyboard warriors”, to push its online messages.
The report features a man who said he was part of a team paid between 25,000 and 50,000 Kenyan shillings (about $190-$390; £145-£300) per day to amplify government messaging and drown out trending protest hashtags on social media platform X.
As part of its research, Amnesty spoke to 31 young human rights defenders who had participated in the protests. Nine of these activists said they had received violent threats via X, TikTok, Facebook and WhatsApp.
As well as digital abuse, the authorities have also been accused of carrying out a brutal crackdown on the protests.
More than 100 people died, rights groups say, when police clashed with protesters during two waves of demonstrations – one in 2024 and one in 2025.
The authorities were also accused of arbitrary arrests, enforced disappearances and using lethal force against the protesters.
The government accepted there had been some case of excessive force by police, but also defended the security forces in other instances.
The demonstrations railed against issues such as proposed tax rises, increasing femicide and corruption.
Amnesty chief Agnès Callamard said the organisation’s report “clearly demonstrates widespread and coordinated tactics on digital platforms to silence and suppress protests by young activists”.
“Our research also proves that these campaigns are driven by state-sponsored trolls, individuals and networks paid to promote pro-government messages and dominate Kenya’s daily trends on X,” she added.
Kenya’s Interior Minister Kipchumba Murkomen said: “The government of Kenya does not sanction harassment, or violence against any citizen… any officer implicated in unlawful conduct bears individual responsibility and is subject to investigation and sanction.”
Amnesty also raised concerns about unlawful state surveillance, including allegations – denied by Kenya’s largest telecom provider, Safaricom – that authorities used mobile data to monitor protest leaders.
Uganda’s massive East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP) has now reached 75% completion, pushing the country closer to exporting its own oil for the very first time.
-All pipeline sections have been delivered -Over $3.3 billion already invested -First oil expected between 2025 and 2027
Once finished, the 1,443 km pipeline will transport crude from Uganda’s Lake Albert region all the way to Tanzania’s port of Tanga making it the world’s longest heated oil pipeline.
This project is expected to be a game-changer for the region, creating jobs, boosting trade, and potentially generating over $1–2 billion per year in revenue for Uganda.
South Africa Secures Major G20 Victory Despite U.S. Absence
Presidency spokesperson Vincent Magwenya has confirmed that the G20 Leaders’ Summit Declaration has officially been adopted — even though the United States was not present.
This marks a major diplomatic win for President Cyril Ramaphosa, especially after Washington privately warned Pretoria against pushing ahead with the declaration without U.S. participation.
According to TimesLIVE, the U.S. even tried to rally some of its European allies to object and stall the process — an effort insiders say was aimed at undermining South Africa’s G20 presidency.
But despite the pressure, South Africa pushed through, and the declaration is now formally adopted.
A significant moment for Pretoria on the global stage.
Former US President Donald Trump has intensified his criticism of Nigeria, calling the country “a disgrace” over what he describes as the government’s failure to protect Christians from extremist attacks.
Speaking on a US radio show, Trump repeated his threat to consider military action against Islamist militants in Nigeria if authorities don’t “do more” to stop violence targeting Christian communities.
His remarks echo a rising narrative in US right-wing circles claiming Christians in Nigeria are uniquely targeted despite the country’s long, complex history of conflict, where both Christians and Muslims have suffered heavy losses from various armed groups, including extremists, bandits and separatist militias.
Jacqueline Ades was arrested for sending over 159,000 messages to a man after their first date in 2017.
The two met on the Luxy dating app in 2017. After their first date, Ades was ghosted by the man and she did not take it cool.
Within 10 months, she sent him more 159,000 messages (about 530 a day). She went as far as sending him threats.
“I’d make sushi outta your kidneys and chopsticks outta your hand bones,” one message read. She was blocked after sending more messages.
After being blocked, Ades moved from Florida to Phoenix, saying, “I told him if he blocked me, I’d come here.”
In April 2018, while he was abroad, Ades broke in twice, bathing in his tub – caught on CCTV . She was found with a butcher knife in her car.
Police later removed her from his home after repeated harassment. Jacqueline was arrested for stalking and trespassing.
Though she pleaded not guilty, she rejected a plea deal and bizarrely demanded marriage.
The charges were dropped in 2020 after she was deemed mentally incompetent to stand trial. She was reported to have shown signs of severe mental illness.
Liverpool striker, Alexander Isak, has been forced to splash out £30,000 on a guard dog after being subjected to death threats online.
The Swedish International ace will soon welcome a highly-trained Doberman to protect him off the pitch as he settles into life on Merseyside.
It follows the abuse he has suffered since his £130million signing from Newcastle United, where the 26-year-old went on strike to force through the move.
Isak and the rest of the Sweden team also faced social media death threats after finishing bottom of their group in the 2026 World Cup qualifiers.
A source said: “Alexander has had a very high-profile summer thanks to the drawn-out transfer to Liverpool and the high price the club paid for him.
“He wants to get settled off the pitch and getting a protection dog is an essential part of that.”
Phoenix Dogs, which claims there is “nothing more loyal” than a protection dog, is providing the Doberman to Isak, who signed a six-year, £300,000-a-week contract with the Reds in September.
It described her as “beautiful inside and out” and a “fabulous beast”.
Isak is the latest top footballer to buy a guard dog after a spate of burglaries and robberies at stars’ homes
Brazil’s Supreme Court on Saturday, November 22, ordered the preemptive arrest of former President Jair Bolsonaro, after Justice Alexandre de Moraes ruled that the 70-year-old politician was preparing to escape the country just days before he was due to begin his 27-year prison sentence for leading an attempted coup.
Bolsonaro was taken from his home, where he had been under house arrest, to the headquarters of the Federal Police in Brasilia early Saturday morning.
Justice de Moraes said in his ruling that Bolsonaro’s ankle monitor, which he had been wearing since July 18 due to being deemed a flight risk, was violated at 12:08 a.m. on Saturday.
“That information shows the intent of the convict to break the ankle monitoring to assure his escape is successful, which would be made easier by the confusion that would be caused by a demonstration organized by his son,” de Moraes wrote.
He added that Bolsonaro might flee to a nearby embassy to request asylum, noting that other coup defendants and allies had already left Brazil to evade imprisonment.
The Supreme Court will vote on the arrest order during an extraordinary session on Monday.
De Moraes stressed that Bolsonaro’s arrest “should be made with all respect to the dignity of former President Jair Messias Bolsonaro, without the use of handcuffs and without any media exposition.”
Bolsonaro’s aide, Andriely Cirino, confirmed the arrest took place around 6 a.m., only hours after the judge issued the decision.
She said the former president was taken from his residence in the upscale Jardim Botânico neighbourhood to the Federal Police headquarters.
Justice de Moraes also referenced a video posted by Bolsonaro’s son, Senator Flávio Bolsonaro, encouraging supporters to take to the streets.
“The video shot by Flávio Bolsonaro stimulates the disrespect to the constitutional text, to the judicial decision and to democratic institutions, showing there’s no limits for the criminal organization in its attempt to create chaos and conflict in this country, in a total disrespect to democracy,” the judge said.
He added: “Brazil’s democracy has reached sufficient maturity to steer away and prosecute pathetic illegal initiatives to defend the criminal organization that is responsible for a coup d’etat attempt in Brazil.”
Supporters who insist Bolsonaro is being politically persecuted are expected to rally outside the Federal Police headquarters.
Sóstenes Cavalcante, leader of Bolsonaro’s party in the lower house, released a video saying the former president is innocent and accused de Moraes of “psychopathy at the highest level.”
“We will always stand by your side. Stay strong. We will respond appropriately,” he said.
Former First Lady Michelle Bolsonaro wrote: “We will not give up on our nation. I believe in God’s justice. Human justice, as we have seen, can’t hold anymore.”
Fabio Wajngarten, Bolsonaro’s former press adviser and attorney, called the arrest “a terrible stain on the institutions,” claiming the ankle monitor was working hours after the alleged violation. “How could something that was broken, violated, be functioning normally nine hours later?” he asked.
He added that Bolsonaro had simply had dinner, “a soup”, with relatives before going to bed around 10 p.m., insisting no sons were present.
Bolsonaro’s brother Renato Bolsonaro also criticized the arrest in an Instagram video: “So we can’t even gather to cry out for justice or pray for our president? Do they want to take away our right to express ourselves?”
