Home Blog Page 509

Supreme Court allows Trump to revoke legal status for 500,000 migrants

The US Supreme Court has granted the Trump administration permission to revoke the temporary legal status of over half a million migrants from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela—at least for now.

The ruling affects approximately 532,000 individuals who entered the US under a “parole” program introduced by former President Joe Biden. The program allowed up to 30,000 migrants per month from the four countries to enter the US legally for a two-year period due to ongoing humanitarian crises in their home nations.

As President Donald Trump adopts a tougher stance on immigration, his administration has worked to dismantle these protections. Legal challenges brought the issue to the Supreme Court, where the government sought to lift a lower court’s order that blocked the revocation of the program.

The conservative-leaning Supreme Court approved the administration’s request, issuing a stay on the lower court’s ruling. The decision was unsigned and offered no explanation. Justices Ketanji Brown Jackson and Sonia Sotomayor dissented, citing “devastating consequences” for the affected migrants.

According to the dissent, the court’s ruling forces migrants to choose between “returning to dangerous conditions in their home countries” or staying in the US and facing potential deportation. They warned that this decision jeopardizes both the safety and legal claims of those involved.

Lower courts had previously ruled against the administration, arguing that the decision to end the program relied on a misinterpretation of immigration law.

Trump has long made immigration enforcement a cornerstone of his political agenda, including plans to deport millions of undocumented migrants.

 US comedian Bill Maher supports Trump’s attacks on Harvard University

Comedian and political commentator, Bill Maher expressed rare agreement with former President Donald Trump during the latest episode of HBO’s Real Time, endorsing Trump’s efforts to penalise Harvard University over its handling of antisemitism on campus.

“Trump has declared full-scale war on Harvard, and like so many things he does, there’s a kernel of a good idea there,” Maher said during Friday’s broadcast. “I’ve been criticizing Harvard long before he was.”

Maher, a graduate of Cornell University, a fellow Ivy League institution — dismissed the notion that his criticism stemmed from academic rivalry. Responding to guest Jake Tapper’s reference to the Cornell-Harvard tension, Maher said his criticism was not personal.

“It’s because Harvard is, in many ways, an a–hole factory that produces smirking, arrogant elites,” Maher said.

Tapper, referencing Congressman Seth Moulton (D-Mass.), another guest on the show and a Harvard alumnus, joked, “He has three degrees from Harvard… that makes him a f–k face times three.”

The comments came in light of Trump’s moves to suspend billions in federal funding to Harvard, citing the university’s alleged failure to address rising antisemitism on campus. The former president has also pushed to revoke the school’s tax-exempt status and limit the number of international students it admits, urging that more spots be reserved for American students.

Maher, once a vocal critic of Trump, recently had dinner with the former president at the White House alongside UFC president Dana White and musician Kid Rock. Following the dinner, Maher commented that Trump seemed different in person than how he is typically portrayed in the media.

“The guy I met is not the same person who, the night before, posted nasty tweets about how terrible it was that I’d even consider having dinner with him,” Maher said.

Last Thursday, a federal judge blocked a Trump administration attempt to revoke visas from international students at Harvard, adding another layer of controversy to the ongoing standoff between the university and former president.

Ray J says racketeering charge makes more sense for Kardashians than Diddy

Ray J is questioning the legitimacy of the racketeering conspiracy charge facing music mogul Sean “Diddy” Combs in his ongoing federal criminal trial.

Speaking on TMZ’s new weekly Tubi series, TMZ Presents: United States V. Sean Combs: Inside the Diddy Trial, the singer and television personality expressed disbelief over the RICO allegations, claiming that such charges would make more sense if they were leveled against the Kardashians.

Ray J, a longtime friend of Diddy, defended him during the episode, insisting that his own experiences around the music executive and several of the witnesses testifying in court have not convinced him that Diddy engaged in organized criminal activity. “I’ve been around Diddy and many of those people talking, and I just don’t see how this fits a RICO case,” he said.

He went on to suggest that the charges may be part of a broader effort to send a message to the embattled music mogul. “Somebody’s definitely sending a message here,” Ray J speculated. “And the message is being received loud and clear.”

The episode also featured criminal defense attorney Joe Tacopina, who clashed with legal analyst Nancy Grace in a heated exchange over the nature of the racketeering elements in the case. The discussion quickly turned personal, with both legal commentators trading jabs as they debated the strength of the prosecution’s arguments.

Adding to the complexity of the case is the testimony of Capricorn Clark, Diddy’s former assistant, which legal experts believe may help prosecutors bolster their RICO claim. The panel, including Harvey Levin, Mark Geragos, Ashleigh Banfield, and Eboni K. Williams, delved into how Clark’s account could be instrumental in connecting various allegations into a coherent conspiracy under the federal RICO statute.

The trial continues to generate intense media coverage, with the high-profile charges against Diddy drawing scrutiny not only for their legal weight but also for the broader implications in the entertainment industry.

Prince Harry reportedly considered changing his last name to Spencer

0

Prince Harry reportedly considered changing his last name to Spencer, distancing himself from the Mountbatten-Windsor surname.

The Duke of Sussex, now 40, is said to have asked his late mother’s brother, Earl Spencer, for advice during a private visit to the UK

However, he was advised against it due to the potential legal complications. A close friend revealed that the discussion was cordial, and Spencer recommended not proceeding with the name change.

Harry’s children currently use the surname Mountbatten-Windsor, a combination of the Royal Family’s name (Windsor) and Prince Philip’s adopted surname, Mountbatten. Had the name change gone through, his daughter would have been known as Lilibet Diana Spencer.

The idea comes amid ongoing tensions around titles and names. Meghan Markle, now the Duchess of Sussex, was seen correcting actress Mindy Kaling during her Netflix show, saying, “It’s so funny you keep saying ‘Meghan Markle’ – you know I’m Sussex now.” She added, “I share my name with my children. It just means so much to go, ‘This is OUR family name. Our little family name.’”

Mountbatten-Windsor was first used by descendants of Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip. Philip adopted the name upon becoming a British subject and renouncing his Greek and Danish royal titles in 1947. A decade later, he and the Queen decided that their direct descendants would carry the surname Mountbatten-Windsor.

Although legally changing one’s name doesn’t require formal procedures, using a deed poll is advised for updating official documents like passports and driver’s licenses.

Harry and Meghan officially became the Duke and Duchess of Sussex when they married in 2018. Prior to this, Harry held the title Prince Henry of Wales. Meghan adopted the feminine form of her husband’s title upon marriage.

Their children, Archie and Lilibet, initially bore the titles Master Archie Mountbatten-Windsor and Miss Lilibet Mountbatten-Windsor. After King Charles ascended the throne, they were recognized as Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet, aligning with royal protocols that grant the titles of prince and princess to the monarch’s grandchildren. Archie and Lilibet are currently sixth and seventh in line to the British throne.

“He’s Sitting Disrespectfully”: Wicknell Chivayo Slammed for How He Sat During Meeting With Tanzanian President

“He’s Sitting Disrespectfully”: Wicknell Chivayo Slammed for How He Sat During Meeting With Tanzanian President

Controversial Zimbabwean businessman Wicknell Chivayo has once again sparked online debate—this time for how he sat during a meeting with Tanzanian President Samia Suluhu Hassan.

Chivayo, who has been making headlines for rubbing shoulders with African Heads of States, starting with Zimbabwe’s Emmerson Mnangagwa, then Kenya’s William Ruto, and now Suluhu Hassan.

Chivayo Gushes Over Suluhu, Compares Her to His Mother
After spending time with Kenyan President William Ruto, Chivayo went to Tanzania, where he met with President Samia Suluhu Hassan. On Wednesday, 28 May 2025, Chivayo took to his social media and shared pictures of himself in a meeting with Samia Suluhu Hassan.

While he didn’t explain the purpose of the meeting, Chivayo posted an emotional tribute to the Tanzanian leader. He praised her for her calm and motherly presence, saying she reminded him of his late mother. He revealed that the meeting took place on Tuesday, 27 May. Part of Chivayo’s post read

“Yesterday, I had the IMMEASURABLE honour of once again meeting Her Excellency, President Samia Suluhu Hassan. This is a woman whose presence alone CALMS a room and whose leadership stirs an ENTIRE continent. In her, I always see the embodiment of MOTHERLY strength, wisdom and the dignified grace that only a true MATRIARCH of Africa can carry. Her tone is always gentle, her humility is constant, but her command is FIRM. In so many ways, her demeanour always reminds me of my late BELOVED mother.

Wicknell Chivayo Criticised for How He Sat During Meeting with Tanzanian President
In the photo, Chivayo can be seen leaning far back into a grand, gold-trimmed armchair with his legs stretched out, one hand resting on the armrest and the other on his phone. While President Suluhu sat upright and engaged, Chivayo appeared laid-back and disengaged, more like someone relaxing at a lounge than in the company of a sitting head of state.

The image didn’t sit well with many Tanzanians. Critics felt Chivayo’s posture showed a lack of respect for the President and the Tanzanian State House. Some even questioned why he was being granted such meetings in the first place.

Tanzanian media personality and activist Maria Sarungi Tsehai was one of the first to speak out. She criticised both Chivayo’s body language and the optics of the meeting, saying he looked more like he was the one in charge.

“Who is this guy? He seems overtly comfortable in the State House as if he is the boss of @SuluhuSamia Jamani huyu vipi? Ikulu imekuwa pa ajabu sana! #TutaelewanaTu,” she posted.

Social Media Has a Field Day
Chivayo’s posture became a trending topic, with users on both sides of the border chiming in. Some defended him, blaming the slouched position on his body size, while others issued warnings to Tanzanians, citing Chivayo’s political connections and controversial wealth in Zimbabwe.

Here are some of the comments:

@skippobruno:

Fat people cannot comfortably sit upright. If he sits upright, he won’t breathe

@ZvanyadzaZviko:

He certainly looks like he is in charge. Be careful, Tanzania.

@JosephMasta_:

He’s sitting disrespectfully

@drDendere:

Please keep asking. He is a millionaire. We don’t know what businesses he runs or where the money comes from.

@aka_Monarchist:

That’s how you sit when the president is in your pocket.

FIVE REASONS WHY GOVERNMENT SHOULD WITHDRAW AND NOT AMEND BILL 7 OF 2025- Linda Kasonde

FIVE REASONS WHY GOVERNMENT SHOULD WITHDRAW AND NOT AMEND BILL 7 OF 2025


By Linda Kasonde

The process is just as important as the content. Amending Bill 7 now will produce an equally flawed outcome for the following reasons:



1. There’s still not enough time before the election to have broad based national consultations

2. It’s too close to the election which risks the process and content being politicised.



3. History has shown us the successive Governments have tried to put in clauses that will favour the incumbent maintaining power.


4. The best time to restart this process is soon after a general election to give Zambians more time to engage with the content.


5. The process should be people-driven not government driven

PF  LEADERS VISITS INCARCERATED MPS & OTHERS AT LUSAKA REMAND PRISON

PATRIOTIC FRONT LEADERS VISITS INCARCERATED MPS & OTHERS AT LUSAKA REMAND PRISON.



Patriotic Front Senior leaders led by the Vice President and Acting Tonse Alliance  Chairman Hon. Given Lubinda pays a solidarity visit to incarcerated political prisoners Hon. Munir Zulu, Hon. Mary Mabonga, Mrs. Kampyongo, and Gabriel Banda at Lusaka Remand Prison.



The delegation includes; NCP President Mr. Peter Chanda, ZRP President Mr. Wright Musoma, Patriotic Front Deputy Secretary General and Lundazi member of parliament Hon. Brenda Nyirenda, Hon. Sylvia Chalikosa MCC, Tonse Alliance National Deputy Chairlady Ms. Charity Kapona MCC, Kabwata grassroot strongman Danny Yenga MCC and Tonse Alliance Lumezi aspiring candidate Goodson Banda, among others.



The leaders were happy to find the Four leaders in high spirit, resolute and far from being broken and encouraged them to continue being strong, reaffirming their  commitment to justice, human dignity, and standing with the oppressed in times of political persecution.

📸Bernard Kamba

CHIFUNABULI’S LUBWE MISSION 120TH ANNIVERSARY PREPARATIONS RECEIVE K800,000 PRESIDENTIAL PLEDGE.

CHIFUNABULI’S LUBWE MISSION 120TH ANNIVERSARY PREPARATIONS RECEIVE K800,000 PRESIDENTIAL PLEDGE.



1 June 2025

CHIFUNABULI – President Hakainde Hichilema has reaffirmed his support for the Catholic Church by pledging K800,000 towards the upcoming 120th anniversary celebrations of Lubwe Mission in Chifunabuli District slated for 28 June 2025.



St Joseph’s Parish Priest Father Mukobekwa read the President’s pledge during a fundraising dinner dance yesterday which attracted both government officials and members of the Catholic clergy, united in their commitment to honour one of Zambia’s oldest mission centres.



The President was at the event represented by Fisheries and Livestock Minister Peter Kapala who was a guest of honour and was accompanied by Luapula Province Minister Nason Musonda, Provincial UPND Chairman Alfred Mwape, Chifunabuli District Commissioner Stanley Mukosa, Catholic priests and nuns, and other local leaders.



In his remarks, Hon. Kapala paid tribute to the early Catholic missionaries, noting: “What began as a single seed of faith in 1905 at Chankasupa Village has grown into a vibrant diocese with 12 parishes serving the entire Luapula Province.”


He also emphasized the long-standing collaboration between the Church and the government in advancing social development.



“The Church provides the moral compass, while the government offers policy and resources. Together, we can deliver sustainable development,” he said as he pledged to personally contribute 200 bags of mealie meal and two cows towards the event.



“As a nation, we are called to protect this legacy, support the vulnerable, and carry the mission forward,” Hon. Kapala added, reaffirming the government’s continued partnership with the Church.



With less than a month to go before the anniversary, both Church and government stakeholders have pledged to work together to make the celebration a meaningful and memorable occasion for the people of Luapula Province and beyond.

(c) The Falcon

MALAWI’S VICE PRESIDENT REGISTERS POLITICAL PARTY NAMED ODYA ZAKE ALIBE MLANDU

MALAWI’S VICE PRESIDENT REGISTERS POLITICAL PARTY NAMED ODYA ZAKE ALIBE MLANDU

By: MBC Digital

Odya Zake Alibe Mlandu is now officially registered as a political party under Malawi’s laws, effective from 30 May this year.



Confirming the news, the party’s secretary general, Happy Kondowe, expressed gratitude to all those who played a part in ensuring the party’s registration.



Odya Zake Alibe Mlandu is led by Malawi’s vice president, Dr. Michael Usi, who has been at the forefront of the party’s establishment.

HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION CALLS FOR CONTINUED ENJOYMENT OF THE RIGHT TO FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION WHILE RESPECTING THE RIGHTS, FREEDOMS AND REPUTATIONS OF OTHERS

HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION CALLS FOR CONTINUED ENJOYMENT OF THE RIGHT TO FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION WHILE RESPECTING THE RIGHTS, FREEDOMS AND REPUTATIONS OF OTHERS



The Human Rights Commission (the Commission) is urging everyone not to be constrained by the revised Cyber Security Act and Cyber Crimes Act from exercising the fundamental right to freedom of expression and opinion.


The Commission has observed that the recent amendments and enactment of the Cyber Security Act, No. 3 of 2025 and the Cyber Crimes Act, No. 4 of 2025 have created an aura of apprehension and fear that the legal reforms are aimed at suppressing freedom of expression.



The enactment of the revised cyber laws should not undermine the enjoyment of the fundamental rights, especially the right to freedom of expression which is indispensable to the promotion of Constitutionalism, the Rule of Law, as well as the promotion and protection of other human rights.

The Commission’s understanding, which is based on the contemporary United Nations Convention against Cybercrime, is that the Cyber Acts are meant to prevent and combat cybercrimes and make the cyber space an inclusive, free and safe environment for all law-abiding individuals.



Therefore, it is expected that the enforcement of cyber laws will not result into violations or abuse of human rights. In an event that human rights will be violated or abused, adequate safeguards exist to ensure that the perpetrators are held accountable, while victims are granted effective remedies in accordance with the due process and equal protection of the law.



The Commission is urging the Government and other State actors as the primary duty bearers, to ensure that the enforcement of cyber laws is always lawful, necessary, proportional and consistent with the established international human rights standards and obligations.



In particular, the Commission’s expectation is that the application of the cyber laws will be consistent with the UN Convention against Cybercrimes which was adopted by the UN General Assembly on 24th December, 2024.



It is important to note that the international community, through the UN, has expressed concern that “the use of information and communications technology systems can have a considerable impact on the scale, speed and scope of criminal offences, including transnational organized crimes such as terrorism, trafficking in persons, smuggling of migrants, drug trafficking and money laundering”.



Therefore, the UN has resolved, as a matter of urgency, to strengthen international cooperation by, among other measures, enacting laws aimed at preventing and combating cybercrime, in view of its “negative economic and social implications and its ability to undermine sustainable development and the rule of law”.



However, the UN is explicit that nothing in the Convention shall be interpreted as permitting the suppression of human rights or fundamental freedoms, including the right to freedom of expression.



The Government is urged to maintain a healthy balance between meeting its complementary obligations of preventing and combating cybercrimes on one hand and respecting digital rights on the other hand.



Finally, the Commission wishes to remind all the rights holders that the right to freedom of expression and privacy are subject to restrictions aimed at protecting national security, public order, public health or morals, as well as respect for the rights and reputations of others.



Therefore, the Commission is urging everyone to freely enjoy their digital rights while refraining from using the cyber space for committing crimes and abusing the rights and reputations of others.

(Original Signed)
Mweelwa Muleya
Spokesperson/ Director-Education, Training & Advocacy
HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION

Offset is reportedly asking for spousal support from Cardi B amid their ongoing divorce

Offset recently requested spousal support from Cardi B in their divorce, although it’s unclear how much he requested.
Cardi B may be in a new relationship with NFL star Stefon Diggs, but she also has to deal with a nasty divorce from Offset. As reported by Complex, she went on Twitter Spaces on Friday (May 30) to react to its latest development.

For those unaware, Offset requested spousal support from Cardi B and accused her of not seeing their kids often, trying to take everything in their marriage, and cutting him out of the family. She denied all of these claims in various explosive statements throughout the livestream.

“I didn’t ask for no child support because I want to be done with this marriage,” the Bronx femcee alleged. “Like, I feel like I’m tied up. […] There is not one day that he’s not allowed to see my kids, okay? […] He stood up my kids three times.” She also launched various insults at the former Migo, such as hoping he dies a slow death.

Cardi said ‘Set talks to their three kids every single day but hasn’t seen them since March. Also, she posited that she would never restrict him from seeing them on any given day, as she wants them to feel the love from both parents.

Then, Cardi B disputed Offset’s claims that she’s trying to take everything in their marriage. She brought up their gifts towards each other, her solo New Jersey house he allegedly didn’t want any part in, and how he allegedly sent her the bill for his Atlanta property for the last year. Also, this allegedly includes other financial burdens like their children’s education, security, and other considerations.

Cardi B also blasted Offset for calling The Breakfast Club to make allegedly false claims about this whole process. In addition, she said she’s down to split the Atlanta house if he wants. The mother of three just wants her former partner to spend time with his kids. Despite her conflict with his family, she allegedly reached out to them to express concern for him.

Other controversies involving Cardi B and Stefon Diggs continue to make headlines. But this Offset conflict will likely take precedence now.

Ye Thanks Drake & Donald Trump Following Larry Hoover’s Commutation

President Donald Trump has commuted Larry Hoover’s federal sentence and it has led to praise from Kanye West.

Kanye West is in a good mood right now thanks to the news involving Larry Hoover and President Donald Trump. On Wednesday, it was announced that the Gangster Disciples founder was having his federal sentence commuted.

If you remember, back in 2021, Kanye West and Drake squashed their beef by holding a “Free Larry Hoover” concert. Overall, this endeavor was a huge success from a musical standpoint. However, there was still a lot of work to do when it came to Hoover’s case.

Well, four years later, the federal sentence is no longer an issue. This sparked gratitude from West, who took to X with a thank you message for both Drake and President Trump.

“Thank you Drake for helping to bring Larry Hoover home,” Ye wrote. He continued: “Words can’t express my gratitude for our devoted President Donald Trump for freeing Larry Hoover.”

Unfortunately, for both Ye and Hoover’s family, the commutation doesn’t actually mean Hoover is coming home.

While the federal sentence has been commuted, Hoover is still facing 200 years in prison for murder. This is a sentence that was issued by the state of Illinois. Presidents are unable to commute state sentences. Only governors can do that. Simply put, unless Illinois Governor JB Pritzker intervenes, Larry Hoover will remain in prison for a very long time.

In addition to Hoover’s commutation, President Trump pardoned NBA YoungBoy for his various federal charges. YoungBoy took to Instagram where he thanked the president for this.

“I want to thank President Trump for granting me a pardon and giving me the opportunity to keep building – as a man, as a father, and as an artist. This moment means a lot. It opens the door to a future I’ve worked hard for and I am fully prepared to step into this,” YoungBoy wrote. “Big thanks to the Pardon Czar, Ms. Alice Marie Johnson, for fighting for second chances for so many people, and to my lawyer, Brittany K. Barnett, for being in my corner and all your hard work to make this possible. And thank you to everyone who believed in me.”

As for Kanye, we wonder how he will feel when he realizes that Trump didn’t get Hoover freed, after all.

Suge Knight claims that Dr. Dre allegedly put out a $20k hit on him

Beyond Dr. Dre, Suge Knight’s other legal conspiracies, allegations, and statements these days concern Diddy’s federal trial.

Dr. Dre and Suge Knight, along with the rest of Death Row Records, had a pretty contentious close to their relationship in the late 1990s. That rift continues to show up today, even via shocking allegations whose subject has already denied in the past.

Per Complex, Knight recently spoke to Piers Morgan via a prison call. For those unaware, the West Coast executive is behind bars for voluntary manslaughter over a 2015 hit-and-run. This took the life of Terry Carter. Suge expressed criticism of California’s three-strikes law as it relates to his case.

However, while referencing this, Suge Knight reignited accusations against Dr. Dre. He alleged that Andre Young paid $20,000 to have Knight killed.

“I’m not supposed to have any strikes,” Suge alleged before the five-minute mark of the YouTube video below. “Also, they have proof of the guys with the guns, they got proof of payments where Andre Young paid these guys to kill me with a personal check. $20,000 here, money there. And they all agreed they was paid to kill me.”

He also mentioned Dre again while talking about the federal trial of Diddy, an explosive process that Suge Knight already made various allegations and statements about. This isn’t the first time he’s made these accusations. The former NFL player and his legal team claimed in 2017 that this alleged hit was supposed to take place the same day on which Suge fatally struck Terry Carter. They also referenced an alleged check for $20K.

Dr. Dre reportedly denied these claims in 2017 via a statement from his legal team to TMZ, which called the allegations “absurd.” In addition, there was a previous response to these accusations. A representative for Dre reportedly told The FADER in 2016 that he’s had “zero interaction” with Knight since leaving Death Row in 1996.

We will see whether or not either party addresses these claims again. There are other huge legal scandals in hip-hop that they’re both probably more concerned with from a commentary standpoint. Then again, this has been going on for so long that there seems to be no end in sight.

PRESIDENT RUPIAH BANDA APOLOGISES TO MR.  HICHILEMA

Presidential Apology

Someone sent me this statement yesterday which I issued on behalf of President Rupiah Banda in 2010. He had issued an apology to then opposition leader Hakainde Hichilema following remarks the President made at the Airport.



I remember this incident vividly well. It bothered the President when he had dragged Mrs Hichilema into politics when she was always in the background and never made any political statements.


The President had questioned why the opposition leader had not been seen in public with his wife as if she was Indian.

When I drafted the statement and showed it to the President, he took red pen and added the last line.



“Sir, the apology is already captured,” I said to him.

As a former international newswire journalist, I don’t like tautology in my writeups.


“Yes I have seen it but include that last sentence for emphasis to show that I am genuinely sorry,” he said.



Lesson:

I learnt that Presidents are mere mortals and should publicly apologise when wrong. They lose nothing but rather gain respect.



**STATE HOUSE**
**LUSAKA**
**THE REPUBLIC OF ZAMBIA**

**Media Statement**
**For Immediate Release**

**PRESIDENT BANDA APOLOGISES TO MR. HICHILEMA**

LUSAKA, July 6, 2016 – His Excellency, Mr. Rupiah Banda, President of the Republic of Zambia said Tuesday that he regretted the statement he made in Ndola in which he made reference to the wife of opposition leader Mr.Hakainde Hichilema and consequently brought her name into politics.



The President said it was not his intention to bring the name of Mrs. Hakainde into politics by the comment he made at Ndola International Airport when he addressed his supporters. Further, President Banda said the context in which he inadvertently used the term Mwenye did not deliver the intended message. What the President meant was that for cultural and religious reasons, some people do not expose their wives in public and that is understood. However, the President has realised that he should not have made that statement, which has been misconstrued.



Nonetheless, President Banda is sorry and has regretted his statement and has unreservedly apologised to Mr. Hakainde Hichilema and his family. In the same vein, President Banda has also apologised to the Asian community for his statement. President Banda believes in equality of all races and therefore regrets that his statement has given the impression that he was a racist or against the Indian community in Zambia.



The President has once again, unreservedly apologised to Mr. Hichilema and the Asian Community for the statement.

**Issued by**

[Signature]

**Dickson Jere**
**SPECIAL ASSISTANT TO THE PRESIDENT**
**PRESS AND PUBLIC RELATIONS**

**Conversations with Memorable Personalities**

MWEEMBA URGES COPPER QUEENS TO TAKE SOUTH AFRICA MATCH SERIOUSLY

MWEEMBA URGES COPPER QUEENS TO TAKE SOUTH AFRICA MATCH SERIOUSLY



Football Association of Zambia (FAZ) president Keith Mweemba has urged the Copper Queens to treat Tuesday’s FIFA international friendly against South Africa with the seriousness it deserves.


Speaking at the Anew Hatfield Hotel in Pretoria, where the Copper Queens are currently based, Mweemba said the Banyana Banyana fixture is a key moment in the team’s journey towards the 2025 TotalEnergies CAF Women’s Africa Cup of Nations (WAFCON).



“Let’s take this game against South Africa very, very seriously. As an executive, we will do our part. Preparations begin now even as we are preparing for the international engagement coming next month,” said Mweemba, who was accompanied by FAZ Women’s national representative Col. Priscilla Katoba.



Mweemba encouraged the players to play with character, passion and the need to respect every opponent regardless of status.

“You should play without fear in any game. It doesn’t matter whether it’s Brazil or Germany but always respect the opponent. I don’t like the word underdog (because) there are no more underdogs in football,” Mweemba said.



“All departments must function from the goalkeeper, to the back line, to the midfield, all the way to the final third. It’s about coordination, transitions and attitude. If we apply ourselves right, we can beat South Africa.”



The FAZ boss also offered his full backing to Coach Nora Häuptle and pledged structural support from the FAZ executive.

“Coach, the problem you shared with me, we shall support you. We are having our first FAZ executive committee meeting on the 7th of June. Decisions will be made, all departments must start functioning and you have our full support,” Mweemba said.


Zambia will face Banyana Banyana at 15h00 on Tuesday, 3 June, in their final match of a three-nation international series that also included Botswana.



The Copper Queens were held to a 1-1 draw by Botswana on Saturday and are looking to sharpen their tactical edge ahead of WAFCON, set to take place in Morocco from 5–26 July 2025.

The people of Zambia deserve access to the full Delimitation Report- Hon. Sunday Chilufya Chanda

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Date: 31st May 2025

STATEMENT ON THE NEED FOR PUBLIC ACCESS TO THE DELIMITATION REPORT

As a Member of Parliament elected to serve the people of Kanchibiya and as a citizen deeply committed to the principles of transparency, equity, and democratic accountability, I wish to make a simple but important call to the Government on this Sabbath day.



It is in the spirit of national interest, beyond partisan lines, that I urge the Government to immediately make public the Delimitation Report prepared by the Electoral Commission of Zambia (ECZ). The recent gazetting of the figure ‘55’ as the proposed number of new constituencies makes the need for openness even more pressing.



Delimitation is not merely a technical or administrative exercise. It carries far-reaching implications for representation, political participation, resource allocation, and equitable development across our Republic. Citizens have a fundamental right to know how boundaries are being redrawn and how such decisions will affect their voice in Parliament and access to national resources.


The integrity of our democracy depends not just on the outcomes of elections, but on the processes that shape electoral frameworks. Transparency in delimitation will:

• Build public trust;
• Ensure stakeholder and citizen buy-in;
• Reduce suspicions of gerrymandering; and
• Affirm that we are all equal partners in Zambia’s democratic project.



This call is not about political advantage. It is about safeguarding democratic integrity and strengthening the institutions we all rely upon, regardless of political affiliation. The Constitution must not be treated as a tool of convenience, but a covenant that binds us all to fairness, equity, and the rule of law.


I reiterate: The people of Zambia deserve access to the full Delimitation Report. We cannot claim to deepen our democracy while withholding the very information that shapes its foundation.



Country first. Always.

Hon. Sunday Chilufya Chanda, MP
Member of Parliament – Kanchibiya Constituency

ZAMBIANS WILL HAVE THE FINAL SAY IN 2026 –  Peter Chanda

ZAMBIANS WILL HAVE THE FINAL SAY IN 2026 – CHANDA

… says the seat of authority does not belong to anyone but Zambians.

LUSAKA, SATURDAY, MAY, 31, 2025 [SMART EAGLES]

NEW Congress party president Peter Chanda says the fate of the UPND in 2026 will be decided by Zambians.

Speaking in Lusaka today, Mr. Chanda said Zambians will decide who would be there President and that no one should claim that they hold the key to national leadership.

He said the seat of authority belongs to the people of Zambia and not individuals.

” Mr. Hichilema is saying “twalikala kale, akekala pesa’, I want to remind him that the seat of authority does not belong to anyone. It belongs to the Zambian people and it is the Zambians that are going to decide who to put on the seat of Presidency in 2026,” Mr. Chanda said.

” As Tonse Alliance let’s us know that our common denominator is to ensure that we restore the dignity of Zambians, we lift them from the shackles of poverty they have been subjected to by the UPND Government,” he said.

And Mr. Chanda said there are no issues that demands or warrants the disqualification of the Lumezi Tonse candidate Mr. Goodson Banda.

He sad ECZ is satisfied with the information provided by the New Congress party and urged the people of Lumezi to turn up in numbers and vote in the 26th June, 2025 parliamentary by election.

Mr. Chanda also announced that all formalities regarding the change of party symbol from a satellite dish that had a man and woman, to a chair have been done.

He said the chair is a symbol of authority.

Bill 7 Is Not a Constitutional Step Forward. It Is a Democratic Collapse- Thandiwe Ketis Ngoma

Bill 7 Is Not a Constitutional Step Forward. It Is a Democratic Collapse

By Thandiwe Ketis Ngoma

This article is a direct rebuttal to Dr. Elias Munshya’s piece titled “Bill 7 Is A Constitutional Step Forward for Zambia.”



Dr. Elias Munshya’s enthusiastic defense of Bill 7 reads less like a legal analysis and more like a public relations exercise. His commendable commitment to constitutionalism cannot excuse the contradictions and democratic failures embedded in this bill.


Let us be clear and uncompromising: Bill 7 is not a reform born of the people. It is an Executive-engineered power grab, crafted in secrecy, devoid of public consent, and fundamentally at odds with the principles of participatory democracy. Wrapping these amendments in the language of inclusion does not make them legitimate. They are hasty, unilateral, and authoritarian in design.


The False Promise of “Democratic Reimagination”

Dr. Munshya celebrates the introduction of proportional representation for youth, women, and persons with disabilities. But this move, while dressed as progressive, is nothing more than political theater.


Where was the national dialogue? When did Zambians agree on these quotas or the criteria behind them? These provisions were not born out of consensus; they were imposed. Representation cannot be manufactured in a boardroom and then marketed as reform. It must emerge through open, transparent, and inclusive deliberation.



Let us not be fooled. Bill 7 was crafted behind closed doors. There were no town halls, no public white papers, and no referendum. That is not democratic reform. That is executive overreach in disguise.

Constituency Expansion or Electoral Manipulation?


The plan to add 55 new constituencies is not a sign of administrative foresight or representational fairness. It is blatant political expansion. In the absence of an independent, data-driven delimitation process, this maneuver reeks of gerrymandering.



Dr. Munshya’s reassurances that the ruling party will not gain unfair advantage are unsubstantiated. There is no transparency, no oversight, and no public data. Who benefits from this sudden expansion? The silence is as revealing as it is alarming.



The Two-Thirds Majority Lie

To claim that Bill 7 is not engineered to secure a two-thirds majority for the ruling party is both disingenuous and insulting. By packing Parliament with unelected appointees through party lists, the Executive is creating a legislative echo chamber.



This tilts the balance of power away from voters and toward ruling elites. In a country without strong proportional safeguards, this is not just undemocratic; it is dangerous. Changing the rules mid-game under the guise of progress is a betrayal of democratic norms.



Civil Service Reform or Executive Capture?

Reducing qualifications for the Secretary to the Cabinet is presented as a minor adjustment. In truth, it opens the door to cronyism. It enables the Executive to install loyalists instead of professionals, further weakening one of the last lines of bureaucratic independence in Zambia.



At a time when the country needs impartial and competent public servants, Bill 7 instead makes room for patronage. This is not reform. It is regression.

Defining Youth While Silencing Their Voice

While defining the age range for youth might sound progressive, it is hollow if the youth themselves were excluded from the process. Were youth organizations consulted? Were they involved at all?



You do not empower young people by handing them empty seats in a chamber they had no say in shaping. True empowerment demands participation, not tokenism. Without it, this is nothing more than identity politics for political gain.

Parliamentary Terms: Clarity Without Consent

Clarifying when parliamentary terms begin and end may offer legal neatness, but it does not solve the deeper issue. These amendments lack legitimacy because they lack consent. You cannot override the will of the people with clever language and procedural precision. Legitimacy in a democracy stems from inclusion, not convenience.



By-Election Reforms: A Direct Attack on Voter Sovereignty

Replacing by-elections with automatic party appointments is an outright assault on democracy. Zambians vote for individuals, not just party brands. Allowing parties to fill vacant seats unilaterally strips citizens of their most sacred democratic right: the vote.



If the cost of elections is truly the concern, then let us debate campaign finance reform. But under no circumstances should financial arguments be used to extinguish democratic participation.



Conclusion: Reform Without the People Is Not Reform

Dr. Munshya claims that Bill 7 is for the people, not for partisanship. That argument falls apart under the weight of a simple truth: the people were not involved



In any democracy worth its name, exclusion equals disqualification. Legitimacy does not lie in the number of provisions a bill contains. It lies in the number of citizens who helped shape those provisions.



Until Bill 7 is taken back to the people through transparent dialogue, independent scrutiny, and national consensus, it cannot be called reform. It is not a step forward. It is a calculated leap into centralized control, cloaked in democratic language but utterly devoid of democratic spirit.

I’m not, I have never been pregnant – Chipo Mwananwasa

I’m not, I have never been pregnant – Chipo Mwananwasa

CHIPOKOTA Mwanawasa, a 36-year-old Policy Adviser to the President, has denied social media claims that she is or was pregnant.

“I was not pregnant and I have never been pregnant for the President,” Mwanawasa testified before principal resident magistrate Idah Phiri.

Mwanawasa’s testimony came in a case where Lusaka businessman Joseph Chishimba, 49, stands accused of harassment utilising electronic communication for sharing a post that claimed President Hakainde Hichilema had impregnated the plaintiff.

However, Chishimba pleaded not guilty to the charge.

The allegations stem from a social media post shared by Chishimba between October 9 and 14, 2024.

The post, shared in a WhatsApp group called “Zambian Politics,” featured a screenshot from a Facebook page attributed to “Hon Charles Kakula” and carried the caption: “Chipo Mwanawasa is my ex-girlfriend and she told me the guy in state house (plot 1) is responsible for her pregnancy.”

This communication is alleged to have been made with intent to cause emotional distress to the on Mwanawasa.

Mwanawasa informed the court that the statement caused significant damage to her personal reputation and that of her family.

She recounted receiving a call from State House Principal Private Secretary Bradford Machila on September 30, 2024, while on duty in Greece, informing her of a pregnancy at State House.

Upon checking her WhatsApp, she discovered she was being implicated.

“I dismissed it and said it should be ignored,” Mwanawasa testified.

However, upon her return to Zambia two days later, the matter was still trending, prompting calls from family and friends.

A family meeting was convened at her late mother’s house, just weeks after her mother’s burial, where her aunt Charity Kabuko Nyirenda, Diana Mambwe, and uncle Patson Kakubo reportedly expressed anger, distress and embarrassment over the widespread post.

Mwanawasa emphasised that the false claims brought her name into disrepute and caused shame to both her and the President, her boss.

“My social life is questioned now when I have spent all my life building my reputation, to be a person of good standing in society, a role model to young people especially young women, to be an example, this has put a dent on my life and that of the President who’s my boss.”

“His family and the country have also been dented from the words posted. I then left the matter in the hands of the police to investigate further as the social media post was still shared and trending,” Chipo said.

She added that the post also put the office of the President in disrepute, as well as to a broader Zambia when it was alleged that there was a relationship between them.

“Nothing of this kind actually existed and has not existed, my Uncle said he would report the matter to the police, and said I should report too. I reported at Lusaka headquarters.”

Her uncle advised her to report the matter to the police, which she did at Lusaka headquarters.

Mwanawasa narrated that she went to report the case, the police showed her the posts and said they were already investigating the matter.

This, development, Mwanawasa expressed, further distressed her, learning that the police were already investigating the posts, particularly as she did not know Charles Kakula, who claimed to be her ex-boyfriend.

Mwanawasa also clarified that there are only two individuals named Chipo Mwanawasa in her family: herself and her 12-year-old niece.

The court adjourned the matter to August 18, 2025, for continuation of trial.

By Lucy Phiri

Kalemba May 31, 2025

CIVIL SERVICE MUST BE SAVED FROM THIS REGIME’S POLITICAL CAPTURE

CIVIL SERVICE MUST BE SAVED FROM THIS REGIME’S POLITICAL CAPTURE

….the current state of our civil service represents a grave betrayal of the democratic principles, observes Mukandila

Lusaka… Saturday May 31, 2025 (SMART EAGLES)

Tonse Alliance National Youth Chairman Celestine Mambula Mukandila has observed the need for the civil service to be saved from the current political rapture.

Mr Mukandila, who is also a Lusaka based Lawyer and PF Matero Constituency strongman, is of the view that the current state of the civil service represents a grave betrayal of the democratic principles upon which the nation was founded.

He notes that what was once a nonpartisan institution, entrusted with the impartial application of the law and the fair administration of government services to all citizens regardless of political affiliation, has been cynically transformed into an active partisan instrument of the ruling UPND.

“This is not merely a matter of inefficiency or mismanagement; it is a deliberate and egregious abuse of power that strikes at the very heart of good governance. This partisan capture manifests itself in numerous ways, the blatant political interference in appointments and promotions, rewarding loyalty above merit; the selective enforcement of laws, favoring those aligned with the ruling party while ignoring or persecuting opponents; and the systematic suppression of dissenting voices within the civil service itself, creating an environment of fear and self-censorship,” he said.

“This undermines the rule of law, creating a climate of uncertainty and injustice where citizens lack confidence in the impartiality of government institutions. Furthermore, it erodes public trust, leading to widespread disillusionment and cynicism.”

Mr Mukandila indicated that the consequences of this systematic dismantling of a crucial pillar of the democracy are dire.

“A fractured society, characterized by deepening divisions along political lines, is the inevitable result. Economic development is hampered by uncertainty and a lack of investor confidence. Our national unity and social cohesion are threatened,” he concluded.

“This is not merely a criticism of a specific administration, it is a warning about the erosion of democratic norms and the potential collapse of our nation if this trajectory continues unchecked. This is a crisis that demands immediate and decisive action to restore the integrity and independence of our civil service and safeguard the future of Zambia.”

SUNDAY SALUTE: GOODSON BANDA – A TRUE SOLDIER OF  PF  PARTY

SUNDAY SALUTE: GOODSON BANDA – A TRUE SOLDIER OF THE PARTY

While out of the country, I learned of Goodson Banda’s adoption as the Tonse Alliance candidate for the Lumezi parliamentary by-election and immediately, I told myself: This is the kind of adoption that deserves a salute.



I have known Goodson Banda as a deeply committed member of the Patriotic Front (PF), long before the party formed government in 2011. Among the many roles he held, I particularly admired his political and administrative acumen during his tenure as PF Lusaka District Secretary in the run-up to the 2011 general elections.



My close association with this intelligent politician began before 2011, when I served as the PF branch offial before becoming the branch chairman for Lilanda Estates. I was subsequently appointed as Publicity Secretary for the PF Matero Constituency Fundraising Committee by then Chairman Morgan Ngona, through his constituency secretary Mr. Simon Mapulanga. My elder brother, now Mwembeshi Ward 31 Councillor Crispin Kabole, served as committee secretary.



That appointment brought me into active fundraising and grassroots mobilization, opening doors to connect with key figures within the party. Goodson Banda stood out as one of the most dedicated.



As secretary to the Ashell Kampengele-led Lusaka District Executive Committee, Goodson was known for his no-nonsense attitude toward deadlines and accountability. His commitment was felt across all constituencies under his jurisdiction.



When Mr. Kampengele transitioned to serve as Lusaka District Commissioner in the new PF government in 2011, Goodson Banda succeeded him as PF District Chairman. I was privileged to attend one of his earliest public addresses in that role, right in Kapwepwe Ward, just months after the party formed government.



During that meeting, he immediately recognized my presence in the crowd and took the opportunity to speak on party unity. He urged then-newly elected Kapwepwe Ward Councillor Maurice Piyo to embrace everyone – including those who had vied for the same position during the adoption process. I had been among those who applied for the PF councilor candidacy for Kapwepwe Ward, though my bid was unsuccessful.



That particular meeting remains one of the most orderly and effective grassroots political gatherings I’ve attended. Goodson chaired it with firm but fair leadership, skillfully moderating the session and setting a new tone for grassroots organization.



Goodson Banda is not one of those political opportunists who join parties for the sake of an adoption certificate. He didn’t show commitment to the party for the sake of adoption. He remained consistent, loyal, and dedicated – traits that eventually earned him this adoption under the Tonse Alliance.



In contrast, we have witnessed many who only join parties for personal gain, and once disappointed, defect to rival camps. Their loyalty is transactional and fleeting. Goodson Banda is cut from a different cloth.

His long-standing commitment and consistency are, without doubt, key reasons behind his adoption. It is a win for principled politics over transactional maneuvering. It is also a reflection of PF’s rebranding – prioritizing leadership, loyalty, and service over money and influence.



If elected, Goodson Banda will bring into Lumezi a wealth of grassroots experience and inclusive leadership. His political maturity, organizational skills, and unwavering dedication make him not only an asset to the Tonse Alliance but also a blessing to the people of Lumezi.



And so today, I raise my hand in this Sunday Salute article – to a man who has risen steadily, humbly, and purposefully. A man whose track record speaks louder than any slogan. A man who reminds us all that leadership is earned, not bought.

To Goodson Banda – salute!

*Saulos The Komboni Ambassador*

Constitutional Amendments Must Reflect the People’s Will, Not Executive Convenience- Thandiwe Ketis Ngoma

Constitutional Amendments Must Reflect the People’s Will, Not Executive Convenience

By Thandiwe Ketis Ngoma

The Constitution is not the property of the Executive. It is the supreme law of the land, a sacred covenant between the people and the state. Amending it is a serious, historic undertaking that demands integrity, inclusivity, and legitimacy. It must never be manipulated to serve the narrow interests of those in power.

Yet what the UPND government is currently pursuing through Bill Seven is not constitutional reform. It is a political maneuver wrapped in legal disguise. The process is rushed, secretive, exclusionary, and contemptuous of the very people it claims to serve. If this is not an abuse of democratic trust, what is?

The Correct Path to Constitutional Amendment

In every credible democracy, constitutional amendments follow a disciplined, transparent, and people-driven process. While the technical mechanisms may differ, the core democratic principles are universal:

1. Genuine Public Participation
Reform must start with the people, not end with them. Citizens, civil society organisations (CSOs), churches, traditional leaders, opposition parties, and professional bodies must be active participants in the process. Anything less than full engagement is illegitimate.

2. Unquestionable Transparency
Constitutional changes must be made in full public view. Every draft, every clause, and every revision must be openly debated. A Constitution is not a confidential document; it is a public contract.

3. Non-Partisan Process
The Constitution belongs to no political party. It must be shaped to serve generations, not administrations. Any process that prioritises ruling party interests over national interest is inherently undemocratic.

4. Independent Leadership
Reforms should be spearheaded by a neutral, inclusive, and expert-led body, not the Executive. When the same people who benefit from the amendments are the ones writing them, the outcome is deeply compromised.

5. Adequate Time for Deliberation
Constitutional reform cannot be rushed. It requires time to consult, debate, and refine. Rushing the process only serves to weaken the foundation of the nation and cast suspicion on the motives behind the changes.

Why Bill Seven Is Undemocratic and Illegitimate

The UPND government’s 13-point proposal under Bill Seven fails every democratic standard. It is a textbook case of how not to amend a constitution.

1. Exclusion of Key Stakeholders
CSOs, legal associations, faith leaders, and political players have all voiced their discontent over the lack of meaningful engagement. The so-called consultation has been a box-ticking exercise. This is not reform; it is dictation.

2. A Recklessly Rushed Agenda
Rather than allowing time for broad consensus, the government is steamrolling the process through Parliament. This haste suggests a political deadline, not a national imperative. Such recklessness undermines both the content and credibility of the amendment.

3. Executive-Authored Amendments
The proposals are coming from the very institution meant to be restrained by the Constitution — the Executive. When the referee starts rewriting the rules, the game is no longer fair.

4. Disregard for Public Opposition
Widespread calls for the bill to be withdrawn or delayed have been met with indifference and even contempt. This is not leadership; it is authoritarianism dressed in democratic clothing.

Conclusion: The Constitution Belongs to the People

This process is not only flawed. It is dangerous. It undermines the spirit of our democracy, insults the intelligence of our citizens, and threatens to plunge our country into deeper political distrust.

If the UPND government has any regard for democracy, it must immediately halt this illegitimate process. Not out of fear, but out of respect for the Zambian people. Reform must return to the drawing board, this time under the direction of the public, where it belongs.

In a truly democratic society, the Constitution is not rewritten in backrooms by the powerful. It is shaped, word by word, through the voices and will of the people.

The Constitution is not changed for the people. It is changed by the people, through consultation, through consensus, and with full transparency. Anything less is not democracy. It is deception.

NICKSON CHILANGWA’S FATHER SUFFERS HEART – ATTACK, CRITICALLY ILL AT MANSA GENERAL HOSPITAL

NICKSON CHILANGWA’S FATHER SUFFERS HEART – ATTACK, CRITICALLY ILL AT MANSA GENERAL HOSPITAL

THE father to jailed former Luapula Minister Nickson Chilangwa is on life -support after he suffered a heart failure in Mansa.

Family members have disclosed that Mr. John Chilangwa is on oxygen at Mansa General Hospital.

Hospital authorities are working hard to resuscitate him but the condition remains critical.

SASYDA Rejects Unconstitutional Amendment of the Zambian Constitution

SASYDA Rejects Unconstitutional Amendment of the Zambian Constitution

As the Southern Africa Students and Youth Development Association (SASYDA), we strongly object to the current Constitution Amendment Bill No. 7, proposed by the UPND political party. This bill, in its current form, is a threat to the democratic rights of the Zambian people.



Amending the constitution without the direct input and participation of the Zambian people is, in itself, an unconstitutional amendment. The constitution belongs to the people, and any changes to it must be made with their explicit consent and involvement.



We urge the government to reconsider its approach and postpone the constitutional amendment process until after the general elections. This will provide an opportunity for the Zambian people to participate as stakeholders in the amendment process, ensuring that their voices are heard and their interests are represented.


As SASYDA, we maintain our stance that the constitutional amendment process must be inclusive, transparent, and people-driven. We will continue to advocate for the rights of the Zambian people and ensure that their interests are protected.



No to unconstitutional amendment

Yes to people-driven constitutional reform

Ibrahim Kabwe Mwamba
SASYDA PRESIDENT

Free Education in Zambia: A Promise Rushed, But Quality Sacrificed?

Free Education in Zambia: A Promise Rushed, But Quality Sacrificed?

By Thandiwe Ketis Ngoma

The UPND government’s decision to introduce free education across Zambia was a landmark move, fulfilling a long-standing promise to eliminate financial barriers and make education accessible to all. The nation greeted this policy with celebration and hope, envisioning a future where every Zambian child could access both primary and secondary education without financial hardship. But now, as the initial excitement fades, troubling signs are emerging. Across Zambia, parents, teachers, and educational experts are sounding the alarm on the harsh realities of this ambitious initiative. Overcrowded classrooms, severe understaffing, and critical resource shortages are threatening to turn the promise of free education into a hollow dream.



The pressing question is: was Zambia truly prepared for this policy? Or did the government rush this initiative, sacrificing quality in its zeal to fulfill a campaign promise? In the haste to deliver, the lack of critical planning has placed an immense burden on schools already strained by limited resources, ultimately jeopardizing the future of the very pupils this initiative was designed to help.



Overcrowded Classrooms and Insufficient Resources

Overcrowded classrooms are perhaps the clearest symptom of a system pushed beyond its limits. With the removal of fees, enrollment numbers have skyrocketed at both primary and secondary levels, pushing classrooms to a breaking point. Many teachers now face the nearly impossible task of managing classes of over 70 pupils—numbers that make effective teaching nearly unattainable. Physical space and resources are stretched so thin that pupils often sit on the floor or share scarce learning materials, reducing their ability to learn in comfort or with focus.



This overcrowding erodes any chance of providing individualized attention, especially crucial for primary pupils who need foundational support and secondary pupils who require subject-specific guidance. The overcrowded conditions make it nearly impossible for teachers to cater to the varying developmental needs of their pupils, leaving many young learners to fall behind at critical stages of their education.



Severe Teacher Shortages and Burnout

The surge in pupil enrollment has left teachers overwhelmed and exhausted, forced to manage workloads far beyond any reasonable capacity. The pupil-to-teacher ratio has become unsustainable, leading to chronic burnout, diminishing morale, and a stark decline in instructional quality. With oversized classes, teachers are not only expected to teach effectively but also to grade assignments, track individual progress, and provide extra support to struggling pupils. These conditions are unsustainable and detrimental to both teacher well-being and pupil learning outcomes.



While the government has attempted to recruit more teachers, these efforts fall drastically short of what’s required. Without an aggressive recruitment and retention plan, the existing teaching force is crumbling under the weight of impossible demands. Secondary schools, in particular, suffer as subjects like math, science, and literature require teachers with specialized expertise—teachers who are now stretched so thin they struggle to engage pupils at the depth required for mastery.


Outdated Materials and Crumbling Infrastructure

Classroom resources and infrastructure, long-standing issues in Zambian education, have only worsened with the influx of new pupils. Many schools lack the most basic supplies—textbooks, desks, chalk—and those that do exist are often outdated, damaged, or insufficient in quantity. Teachers are left scrambling to teach with inadequate materials, while pupils miss out on essential tools for effective learning.


Furthermore, a severe lack of critical infrastructure plagues the education system. Essential facilities like clean water, functional toilets, and electricity are absent in many schools, creating harsh and unsafe learning environments. With enrollment now surging, these problems have intensified, pushing already-stressed facilities to the brink. No child should be forced to learn in an environment that lacks basic necessities; this is a fundamental issue of dignity and quality that cannot be ignored.



Erosion of Learning Outcomes and Educational Standards

The real measure of any education policy is its impact on learning outcomes. In Zambia, the push for free education is showing disturbing signs of eroding educational quality. Teachers report that pupils are increasingly unable to meet basic learning standards due to overcrowded classrooms and lack of resources. Primary pupils are failing to build essential skills in reading, writing, and math, while secondary pupils are unable to reach the academic rigor needed to succeed in high school and beyond.



This failure to meet core learning objectives creates a cascade of issues, as pupils advance through the system with widening learning gaps. Without timely intervention, Zambia risks creating a generation ill-prepared for higher education, vocational training, or the workforce. If these fundamental issues are not addressed, the nation’s educational standards will continue to decline, holding back Zambia’s potential for economic and social development.



A Policy Implemented Without Sufficient Planning

The promise of free education was a visionary move with the power to reshape Zambia’s future. Yet, the government’s failure to approach this policy with the necessary planning has exposed schools, teachers, and pupils to immense challenges. Adequate funding, sufficient infrastructure, comprehensive teacher recruitment and training, and updated learning materials were all essential elements that should have accompanied this initiative. Without them, free education is at risk of becoming unsustainable and ineffective.



Conclusion: Quality Must Match Access

The UPND government’s free education policy has potential, but access without quality is an empty promise. To truly uplift Zambia’s youth, free education must be paired with an uncompromising commitment to quality. This means investing in teachers, upgrading infrastructure, and providing the resources necessary for real learning. Without these, Zambia risks creating a generation that passes through the school system without the skills needed to thrive in life. The country deserves better, and so do its pupils. Quality education cannot be sacrificed for political gains—it is a foundational investment in Zambia’s future that must not be overlooked.

KAPASA MAKASA PREACHES UNITY AMONG OPPOSITION POLITICAL PARTIES

KAPASA MAKASA PREACHES UNITY AMONG OPPOSITION POLITICAL PARTIES

….as he Interacts with Structures in Serenje

Serenje… Saturday, May 31, 2025 – Kapasa Makasa, a Member of the Central Committee of the Socialist Party (SP), has called for unity among opposition political parties during an interaction with party structures in Serenje District.



Speaking during a meeting held on Friday, Makasa urged the Socialist Party leadership in Serenje to embrace collaboration with all like-minded opposition entities, including parties such as Tonse, UKA, Zambia We Want, as well as with progressive forces like traditional and church leaders.



Makasa emphasized that the current UPND government had failed to fulfill its promises, leaving many Zambians disillusioned and facing hardships.

He called on opposition forces to seize the moment and join efforts in confronting injustices and failures of the administration.



“We must come together, pool our resources, and present a united front,” Makasa told the gathering of district and constituency officials.

He also reminded attendees of the aspirations of Zambia’s founding fathers, who he said had envisioned a nation that is just, equitable, and prosperous for all.



Makasa stated that the government’s current policies had deviated from this vision and urged citizens to reclaim the dream of a better Zambia — one where education, healthcare, and economic opportunity are accessible to every citizen.



In the same meeting, Fletcher Kalobwe, another SP Central Committee Member, called on local party leaders to actively engage in national debates — particularly concerning the proposed constitutional amendment, which he suggested was an attempt to extend the UPND’s grip on power.



Kalobwe stated that the amendment should be rejected in the strongest possible terms, warning that it posed a serious threat to democracy.



He urged all stakeholders to rise above their differences and unite in defense of the constitution and the will of the people.


“Our constitution must serve the people, not those in power,” Kalobwe said. “We must stand firm against any attempt to undermine our democracy.”

“KASONDE MWENDA’S GMOs FIASCO: A LEADER OUT OF TOUCH WITH REALITY”

“KASONDE MWENDA’S GMOs FIASCO: A LEADER OUT OF TOUCH WITH REALITY”

By Timmy

Folks, I’m beginning to doubt the mental stability of this brother, Kasonde Mwenda! His press statement on GMOs is a joke, a total disaster. Which government imports maize during a bumper harvest? Doesn’t he know that common sense is key in leadership?



🔴The Facts About GMOs

✅Genetic modification isn’t new; we’ve been doing it through selective breeding for centuries. Modern genetic engineering is precise, isolating genes for desirable traits like disease resistance.
✅ GMOs aren’t inherently dangerous; rigorous testing ensures modified products display desired traits without unexpected alterations.


✅ The scientific consensus is clear: GMOs are as safe as non-GMO foods. Yet, misinformation abounds, particularly in Africa, where it harms smallholder farmers.



✅Kasonde Mwenda’s Hypocrisy

✅He condemns GMO imports while enjoying imported goods from ShopRite, which likely contain GMOs. Talk about double standards!
✅ New cassava strains ripening in 2 seasons instead of 3 are a form of genetic modification. F1 varieties of fruits, grains, and veggies yielding more than traditional ones are also genetic modification.



🔴The Real Issues

✅ Zambia needs leaders who understand science, agriculture, and governance. Emotional appeals and misinformation won’t cut it.


✅ The country requires sustainable economic strategies, transparency, and accountability. Let’s focus on building a stronger Zambia, rather than playing politics.

WAGON MEDIA

All is set for  today’s bull auction at President HH’s Choma Farm.

All is set for  today’s bull auction at President HAKAINDE HICHILEMA’s Choma Farm.

And President HAKAINDE HICHILEMA says the bull auctioning is meant to promote government’s desire to start exporting beef to neighbouring countries.



Meanwhile, Information and Media Minister CORNELIUS MWEETWA, who is also Choma Central Member of Parliament says the President will first attend Church Service at Brethren in Christ Church at Choma Secondary school grounds scheduled to start at 08:30 hours before proceeding to the auction later in the day.


Mr. MWEETWA has invited all those who want such kind of empowerment to improve their cattle breeds to be at President’s Farm in Choma.

CREDIT:ZNBC

OVER 3, 000 QUALITY BULLS TO BE AUCTIONED AT THE HH CHOMA FARM THIS SUNDAY

OVER 3, 000 QUALITY BULLS TO BE AUCTIONED AT THE HH CHOMA FARM THIS SUNDAY

In a bid to improve cattle breeding and the quality of beef, in the surrounding areas and Zambia as a whole, President Hakainde Hichilema will this Sunday, 1st June, 2025 be auctioning over 3, 000 quality bulls at His Choma farm in Southern Province.



The Head of State, who is not only a rancher but a crop farmer, has been one of the major producers of quality beef and bulls in Zambia for many years now.

The auction slated for this Sunday will open at exactly 10:00 hours.



Livestock farming is one of the major sources of self employment and if going by numbers, and each bull costing K30, 000 as a giveaway price as most bulls cost not less than K50, 000, President Hichilema would raise a whooping 90, 000, 000 Kwacha out of his 3, 000 bulls.



The President has, since his young age, been doing extensive Livestock farming and is now calling for diversification into crop farming in the country.



According to researchers, farming is set to be the major producers of billionaires in the next years


Farming is also set to be one of the major sources of jobs, including self-employment.

Khanyo Maphumulo, “I earned less than R10,000 for Sarafina!”

Khanyo Maphumulo, “I earned less than R10,000 for Sarafina!”

Actress and singer Khanyo Maphumulo, renowned for her role in the iconic film Sarafina!, has disclosed that she earned less than R10,000 for her contributions to the beloved production.



The revelation has sparked renewed conversations about the exploitation of young talent in the entertainment industry. Maphumulo, who was just 14 when she auditioned for the Sarafina! stage play and 17 during the film’s production, claims she was taken advantage of due to her youth and lack of industry knowledge.


As a co-composer of songs like Freedom Is Coming and The Lord’s Prayer, she expected fair compensation but alleges she never signed a contract, leaving her vulnerable to exploitation. “I was young and naïve,” Maphumulo said, reflecting on the experience.


Despite her efforts to secure royalties through the Southern African Music Rights Organisation (SAMRO), Maphumulo has faced setbacks, with her claims yet to be resolved.



The actress’s story highlights ongoing challenges faced by artists in securing fair pay for their work, especially in the context of South Africa’s historically complex entertainment landscape.



Now a celebrated figure, Maphumulo continues to perform and inspire. In September 2024, she was honored with the Iconic Impact Award at the South African Heroes Awards, recognizing her enduring contributions to the arts.



Her story serves as a powerful reminder of the need for better protections for young artists in the industry.

IFP Deputy Chief Whip KP Sithole assassinated in Katlehong

Breaking news

IFP Deputy Chief Whip KP Sithole assassinated in Katlehong

Khethamabala Petros “KP” Sithole, a senior Inkatha Freedom Party (IFP) Member of Parliament and the party’s Deputy Chief Whip, was fatally shot in Katlehong, Gauteng, this evening Saturday, May 31.



The IFP has strongly condemned the killing, describing it as a targeted assassination. Sithole, 68, served as the Gauteng Provincial Chairperson and was a respected member of the party’s National Council for decades.



Police have launched an investigation into the fatal shooting. While no arrests have been made, authorities have confirmed that the matter is being treated with urgency.


In a statement, the IFP called on law enforcement to act swiftly in apprehending those responsible. “We demand justice for KP Sithole. His murder is not only a loss to our party but to South African democracy,” the party said.



Tributes have been pouring in from across the political spectrum, remembering Sithole as a committed public servant who championed the cause of his constituents with unwavering dedication.

The motive for the attack remains unclear.

Enhle Mbali opens up on divorce from Black Coffee, “I Never Cheated”

Enhle Mbali opens up on divorce from Black Coffee, “I Never Cheated”

Actress and fashion designer Enhle Mbali Mlotshwa has broken her silence on her highly publicized divorce from Grammy-winning DJ Black Coffee, real name Nkosinathi Innocent Maphumulo.


In a candid interview, Mbali firmly denied ever being unfaithful during their eight-year marriage, which ended in 2021.



Mbali revealed that her decision to end the marriage stemmed from Black Coffee fathering two children with two different women, a betrayal she described as crossing her “non-negotiable” boundary. “I never cheated,” she asserted, addressing speculation about her role in the marriage’s breakdown.


The actress emphasized her commitment to fidelity, stating that infidelity was a dealbreaker that led to the collapse of their union.



The comments have ignited a firestorm of reactions on social media, with some fans praising Mbali’s strength and others urging her to move on.



The former couple, who share two children, continue to navigate their post-divorce lives under the scrutiny of the public eye.


Mbali’s focus remains on her career and personal growth, as she continues to build her brand and inspire others with her resilience.

Mamelodi Sundowns face crucial showdown in Cairo for CAF Champions league final

Mamelodi Sundowns face crucial showdown in Cairo for CAF Champions league final



Mamelodi Sundowns, are in Cairo for the decisive second leg of the 2024/25 CAF Champions League final against Egypt’s Pyramids FC, with the aggregate score locked at 1–1. The match, set for tomorrow at 7pm SA time at the 30 June Stadium, promises a thrilling conclusion to the continental showdown, with Sundowns chasing their first title since 2016 and Pyramids aiming for their maiden crown.



The first leg in Pretoria on May 24 saw Sundowns take the lead through Lucas Ribeiro’s 54th-minute strike, only for Walid El Karti to stun the sold-out Loftus Versfeld crowd with a stoppage-time header, securing a vital away goal for Pyramids.



With the away goals rule in effect, Sundowns must score at least once to keep their hopes alive. A win or a high-scoring draw (2–2 or higher) will secure the trophy for the Brazilians, while a Pyramids victory or a 0–0 draw will crown the Egyptian side champions. A 1–1 result will force penalties.



Sundowns, led by coach Miguel Cardoso, have shown resilience, eliminating 12-time champions Al Ahly in the semifinals on away goals. Their experience in high-stakes matches, bolstered by players like Ronwen Williams and Teboho Mokoena, gives them an edge. However, Pyramids, backed by significant investment and a dynamic attack led by Fiston Mayele, are unbeaten in their last 23 home games and buoyed by the return of key player Mostafa Fathi.



Can the Brazilians etch their name in history, or will Pyramids make a bold statement on their debut final?

Henke Pistorius sparks controversy with criticism of South Africa’s race laws

Henke Pistorius sparks controversy with criticism of South Africa’s race laws

Henke Pistorius, the father of convicted murderer Oscar Pistorius, has ignited debate with his outspoken criticism of South Africa’s race-based laws, aligning himself with AfriForum and billionaire Elon Musk.



In a recent appearance on Piers Morgan Uncensored, Pistorius dismissed the country’s crime statistics as unreliable, urging viewers to consult AfriForum for accurate data on issues like farm murders.



He also labeled the anti-apartheid song “Kill the Boer” as a call to “total anarchy,” echoing the Afrikaner rights group’s claims of racial discrimination against white South Africans.



AfriForum has long campaigned against Black Economic Empowerment (BEE) laws and the Expropriation Act, arguing they unfairly target white citizens.



Their narrative gained global attention when Elon Musk, born in Pretoria like Pistorius, shared their documentary on X, condemning South Africa’s “142 laws forcing racial discrimination.” Musk has repeatedly criticized BEE policies, citing their impact on his company Starlink’s operations, which face licensing hurdles due to local Black ownership requirements.

Riots in Mandevu

Riots in Mandevu

Lusaka, Saturday, May 31,2025

The Zambia Police Service would like to inform the general public that yesterday May 30,2025 at around 23:00 hours, Undersheriffs from the Lusaka High Court executed a Court Order in favour of a company identified as SOFITEL. The Order granted the company ownership of the open space opposite Heroes Stadium, where marketeers have been trading illegally.

The operation, which continued into the early hours of today Saturday, was aimed at securing and fencing off the said premises. During this process, four makeshift stalls were dismantled, with no significant damage caused to other structures.

At around 05:00 hours, some traders who arrived to begin their business activities discovered that their merchandise had been tampered with, and some claimed items were missing. In response, they resorted to blocking the Great North Road in protest.

Police responded swiftly to the disturbance and engaged with the traders through their market leaders. The situation was calmed through dialogue without the use of teargas or discharge of firearms.However, a vehicle which passed through the area before the arrival of Police officers was stoned by agitated individuals.

We wish to assure the public that calm has since been restored. Trading activities have resumed, and traffic is now flowing normally. We urge all affected parties to remain peaceful and to resolve matters through lawful and constructive means.

Rae Hamoonga
POLICE PUBLIC RELATIONS OFFICER

PRESIDENT DUDA HAILS STRONG ZAMBIA-POLAND RELATIONS, CALLS FOR ENHANCED COOPERATION

PRESIDENT DUDA HAILS STRONG ZAMBIA-POLAND RELATIONS, CALLS FOR ENHANCED COOPERATION

Warsaw, Poland – President of the Republic of Poland His Excellency Mr. Andrzej Duda, has reaffirmed the longstanding bilateral ties between Zambia and Poland, expressing his government’s strong desire to expand cooperation in key development sectors including Education, Information and Communication Technology (ICT), and Energy.



President Duda made these remarks at the Belvedere Palace in Warsaw, following a formal ceremony in which Her Excellency Mrs. Winnie Chibesakunda presented her Letters of Credence, officially accrediting her as Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary of the Republic of Zambia to the Republic of Poland on a non-resident basis.



During their private discussion, President Duda underscored Poland’s commitment to fostering deeper partnerships with Zambia, highlighting the potential for collaboration in areas that can significantly contribute to national development and mutual prosperity.



Ambassador Chibesakunda conveyed cordial greetings and best wishes from His Excellency Mr. Hakainde Hichilema, President of the Republic of Zambia, and the Zambian people. She expressed appreciation for Poland’s support during the evacuation of Zambian students from Ukraine and emphasized Zambia’s readiness to attract investment and forge strategic partnerships.



The Ambassador noted the adverse effects of the recent 2023/2024 drought on Zambia’s agriculture sector and shared government efforts to mitigate the impact through climate-resilient initiatives. She called for Polish investment in mechanized agriculture, irrigation, water harvesting, and alternative energy to help reduce dependence on hydroelectric power.



Additionally, Ambassador Chibesakunda lauded the longstanding humanitarian contributions of Polish missionaries and nuns in Zambia, citing the Kasisi Orphanage as a testament to Poland’s compassion and solidarity with vulnerable communities.



President Duda welcomed the Ambassador’s statements and assured her of Poland’s continued support during her mission. He reiterated his country’s interest in working closely with Zambia to expand areas of cooperation for shared development.



This is according to a statement issued by First Secretary-Press, Lubinda Kashewe at the Embassy of the Republic of Zambia, Germany and obtained by UPND Media Team.

© UPND Media Team

Diplomatic Appointments and Governance: Lessons from the Continued Tenure of U.S. Ambassador Michael C. Gonzales in Zambia

Diplomatic Appointments and Governance: Lessons from the Continued Tenure of U.S. Ambassador Michael C. Gonzales in Zambia

By Reuben Nyambe

The retention of Ambassador Michael C. Gonzales as the United States’ envoy to Zambia under President Donald Trump’s administration offers a compelling case study in the contrasting philosophies underpinning diplomatic appointments in the United States and Zambia. Appointed by President Joe Biden in 2022, Ambassador Gonzales has not only remained in his position following the transition of power but has continued to serve with distinction—underscoring the meritocratic principles that can guide effective diplomatic service.

Ambassador Gonzales, a career member of the Senior Foreign Service, was nominated on April 22, 2022, confirmed by the United States Senate on August 4, and presented his credentials to Zambian President Hakainde Hichilema on September 16 of the same year. His background includes extensive experience in African affairs, with prior postings in Malawi, Ethiopia, Zimbabwe, and Uganda. His professional track record, rather than his political affiliation, has clearly informed the decision by the new U.S. administration to retain him.

This stands in marked contrast to Zambia’s own approach to diplomatic appointments, which have historically been characterized by patronage and political favoritism. In many instances, ambassadorial postings have been awarded to ruling party cadres, often lacking the qualifications or experience necessary for effective diplomatic representation. These appointments frequently reflect domestic political calculations rather than strategic national interests.

The consequences of such an approach have been significant. In 2022, President Hichilema publicly criticized some diplomats for engaging in misconduct abroad, remarking that some envoys spent more time consuming alcohol than advancing Zambia’s foreign policy objectives. Further reputational damage was incurred when the ambassador to South Africa was recalled following allegations of sexual misconduct—an episode that underscored the risks of appointing individuals without adequate professional grounding.

By contrast, the U.S. system distinguishes between political and career appointments. While presidents do nominate political allies to certain high-profile posts, particularly in allied or ceremonial locations, the vast majority of American ambassadors to strategically important or complex regions are drawn from the ranks of the career foreign service. These individuals undergo rigorous training and are subject to Senate confirmation—a process that ensures a basic threshold of competence and accountability.

Ambassador Gonzales’s recent decision to suspend $50 million in U.S. medical aid to Zambia, following credible findings of widespread theft of donated medications, exemplifies the kind of principled and evidence-based leadership that experienced diplomats bring to the table. His actions, although difficult, reflect a broader commitment to integrity in foreign aid and a willingness to confront difficult truths in the interest of long-term partnership and reform.

Zambia stands to benefit significantly from adopting a more professionalized and merit-based system of diplomatic appointment. In an increasingly interconnected and competitive global environment, the capacity to represent national interests effectively on the international stage is not a luxury, but a necessity. Strengthening the integrity of foreign service appointments would not only enhance Zambia’s credibility abroad but also contribute to more coherent and consistent foreign policy outcomes.

The continued service of Ambassador Gonzales under two ideologically distinct U.S. administrations offers an instructive example of the value of competence, continuity, and professionalism in diplomacy. It is a standard worth aspiring to.

HH only listens to his inner demons- Fred M’membe

OUR CONSTITUTION – THE PEOPLE UNITED CANNOT BE DEFEATED [3 MINS READ]

It’s very clear that the amendments to the Constitution that Mr Hakainde Hichilema wants to make are for his own and UPND’s political benefit, survival, and otherwise.
Mr Hichilema shouldn’t be allowed to  change or amend our Constitution to politically and otherwise benefit themselves. The approach Mr Hichilema has taken to amendment the Constitution is not  transparent and inclusive and undermines fundamental principles  the Zambian people have been trying nurture over the last three decades.



Mr Hichilema should understand that amending the Constitution is a serious matter that should be approached with cold reason and dispassion, ensuring it serves the long-term interests of the nation, not a fleeting political moment.



A constitution shouldn’t be changed lightly. Mr Hichilema shouldn’t be allowed to change the Constitution for what is clearly personal gain or political expediency. What Mr Hichilema has put in Bill 7 are clearly self-serving political or election related amendments.


Our Constitution should not be changed to favour the political survival of Mr Hichilema. Any changes should be prospective, applying to those in the future, not only to benefit those currently in power.



The amendments to the Constitution shouldn’t be reduced to a political game. The Constitution shouldn’t be reduced to a tool to be manipulated for political gain or to address a specific political moment. It should be seen as the foundation of a society, not something to be changed at whim.



It’s very clear that Mr Hichilema doesn’t mean well with his Constitution amendments. There’s no meaningful transparency and inclusivity in his Constitution amendment process. He hasn’t even allowed  adequate public discourse. Any attempt to amend the Constitution must be accompanied by a consultative and deliberative process involving an informed citizenry. The public should be fully involved in the discussion and decision-making process. The way Mr Hichilema has gone about his Constitution amendments amounts to secretive amendments.



Constitution amendments should not be made behind closed doors or without widespread public awareness and debate. This really undermines the culture  we have been trying to develop over years to protect fundamental principles.



Mr Hichilema’s approach undermines everything we have achieved over the years. Amendments to the Constitution should not weaken fundamental principles like the rule of law or  democracy. It’s very clear that Mr Hichilema has no interest in the long-term consequences of his amendments. Any amendments to the Constitution should be carefully considered for its potential long-term impact on the nation and its citizens.



A constitution amendment process of just a few weeks is certainly faulty. A more rigorous process is needed. It shouldn’t be so easy and so quick to amendment the Constitution. It should be a difficult amendment process.


The Constitution should have a difficult amendment process to ensure that changes are well-considered and supported. It should have a supermajority support of the population.


These major Constitution amendments Mr Hichilema wants to make warrant a constitutional convention, where representatives from across the nation can debate and propose changes.
In essence, Mr Hichilema should be made to understand that amending a Constitution should be a serious, transparent, and inclusive process that prioritises the long-term well-being of the nation and its people, not his short-term political interests or those of the UPND.



But Mr Hichilema is not a person who listens to fellow citizens. As I have stated before, he only listens to his inner demons. He does as he wants. What he wants matters more than what the rest of the citizens of this country want. As such,  for the citizens of this country to get what they want, they have to outrightly defeat him. This calls for maximum national unity and mass mobilisation.

A people united can never be defeated!

Fred M’membe
President of the Socialist Party

WHY DOES UPND HATE ZAMBIAN CITIZENS LIKE THIS? – what have Zambians done so wrong to UPND?- Hon. Mutotwe L. Kafwaya

Lunte Lawmaker Hon. Mutotwe L. Kafwaya writes:::

WHY DOES UPND HATE ZAMBIAN CITIZENS LIKE THIS? – what have Zambians done so wrong to UPND?

Zambians gave UPND a chance to govern them. This was so that citizens could benefit from what they believed was going to be people a centered leadership.



Instead of loving Zambians back for the support UPND received from them in 2021, the UPND immediately after assuming office started threatening Zambians “soon you won’t even be able to repair your cars.”



@Indeed UPND has made things so difficult for many Zambians that they are not only unable to repair their cars, but are also not able to afford the necessary fuel for those broken down cars.



For countless Zambians today, having two meals per day has become a pipe dream. Where has this hatred come from? Who is the chief instigator of this hatred for citizens?



Today, any one, from any quarter who brings out a good idea, which is for the benefit of citizens, s/he will have her or his idea shot down like a misile launched by an enemy targeting a strategic installation.



Just care to look at some of these examples;

A Catholic father just advised, please UPND do not use these graphs, instead make it possible for people in Misisi and Jack compounds to have nshima on the table. “Ulutoshi lwabwali – alelya Umuntu – ekwisa panshi.” Listen to the venom in reactions from UPND, you won’t like to hear that twice.



An Arch-bishop preaches fairness, respect and balance. He even said when a man is wrong, he is wrong no matter who it is. He was immediately branded a Lucifer – if you know! that proud arch-angel who was chased by God to later become the devil we have come to know. In effect calling the Archi-bishop the very devil.



What a venomous response this was!

Before the Lumezi seat was projected to become vacant, another bishop was strongly warned by a UPND minister for simply speaking for the welfare of people. The UPND minister would go and apologize for his threats on the bishop after it became clear that sooner rather than later, UPND would go back to the people of that area to lobby them for votes regarding the Lumezi seat.



Bishops are not like UPND. While UPND is unforgiving to the Zambians who voted them into office, the Bishop forgave the minister for his attacks on him.

But the shooting down of ideas has not ended with those without political office. It is any good idea for welfare of citizens which is unwelcome to the UPND. Any of such good idea is met with full strength in opposition until it’s defeated by the UPND. It is like “we’ve not finished punishing these people.” What is this good idea doing here?


Look at the reaction of UPND to the following private members motions in parliament;

-Urge government to increase FISP beneficiaries – they shot it down. It’s like UPND saying we don’t want abundance of food. We want you to suffer with high prices.


-Urge government to make bursary compulsory – they shot down. It’s like saying what is there is enough for propaganda. Why put money in everyone?

-Urge government to take practical measures to reduce the cost of living – they could not stand the idea of reducing cost of living for citizens such that they ran away, abandoning the house to the opposition. It’s like how on earth should citizens access cheaper living?



-Urge government to plan agriculture acording to Agro-Ecological zones. It is like saying, we don’t care how agriculture is planned. After all making things easier for citizens is antithetical to UPNDs vision.

What have citizens done to UPND so wrong as to induce this kind of hatred?



When it comes to implementing bad laws and bad policies – look at the velocity with which they come into effect.

Unpatriotic exportation of maize –
Unpatriotic exportation of electricity –



No apology needed by UPND. 

And so, in that arrogance – boom! Cyber Crimes Act – boom! Cyber Security Act.

As citizens are scratching the itchy backs due to being told keep quite. Cyber laws are following you – then the big one –

Constitutional Amendment  Bill.

For whose interest? UPND. And to whose detriment? Citizens.



And my mind the same question lingers; what have citizens done so wrong to UPND to deserve this level punishment?

Surely, is acting against citizens going to remain UPNDs only legacy? I ask this way because the commissioned toilets in Kwacha in Kitwe remain incomplete to date.



All the roads they talk about are not theirs – they have given them away to private capital for many years to come. I know that even a mine belonging to the Zambian people was given away to foreigners free of charge. This is quite deep hatred for people.



I wish to strongly recommend for the UPND to start finding solutions for the welfare of citizens. Embark on a policy framework which focuses on development and not politics. This is one way in which you will be able to create a legacy better than theft of donated drugs and incomplete toilets.

Restoring EVERYTHING PATRIOTIC.
MK30.05.2025

Inkoko Teti Yende Panshi Nga Takwaba Utwana: Why Chiefs Cannot Speak Alone for Democracy- Dr Mwelwa

*Inkoko Teti Yende Panshi Nga Takwaba Utwana: Why Chiefs Cannot Speak Alone for Democracy*



By Dr Mwelwa

In every village under the African sun, the elders say, “Inkoko teti yende panshi nga takwaba utwana” — the chicken cannot walk proudly if the chicks are missing. So too it is with a chief: a chief is not one without the people. When the voice of a leader speaks louder than the heartbeat of their subjects, silence is mistaken for consent — and tradition is stretched into submission.



The recent endorsement of the constitutional amendments by the Luapula Council of Chiefs, though ceremonially rich, raises troubling questions in the domain of public interest, legal legitimacy, and constitutional morality. In their declaration, the chiefs praised the proposed reforms as “transformative,” aligning with development and the so-called empowerment of governance structures. But public interest cannot be proclaimed from thrones; it must be heard from the ground — from the schools without roofs, the clinics without medicine, and the youth without jobs. That is where legitimacy is born.



The principle of salus populi suprema lex esto — the welfare of the people shall be the supreme law — reminds us that every amendment, every clause, and every political whisper in the corridors of power must echo the will and welfare of the people. It is not enough that traditional leaders offer approval. The true guardians of the Constitution are the citizens, not the custodians of culture who, however noble in purpose, are often isolated from the daily sufferings of the governed.



Let us not forget that the majority of our traditional leaders operate within structures of poverty, patronage, and political vulnerability. Most do not enjoy economic independence. Many are not versed in constitutional law or modern governance dynamics. Their survival depends on allowances, state recognition, and periodic gestures of political goodwill. To say they have spoken for the people is to say that the roots have spoken for the leaves. And yet it is the leaves that feel the wind.



The Constitution is not a royal decree — it is a living social contract, or as Aristotle might say, nomos empsychos — the law as a living spirit. To amend it requires more than royal praise; it requires popular participation, robust dissent, and wide public education. What we are seeing now is not participation but performance — a symbolic coronation of a bill that has not truly reached the grassroots, and whose contents many citizens have never seen, let alone debated.



In our African wisdom, we say, “Umwana ushenda, atasha nyina ukunaya” — the child who does not travel praises his mother’s cooking as the best. Chiefs, loyal to what they know and what they’ve been told, may genuinely believe these amendments are good. But belief is not knowledge. And endorsement without informed consent is a dangerous illusion, especially when delivered from a platform supported by state actors and flanked by ministers with political stakes.



Moreover, to use chiefs as shields for unpopular reform is to endanger the very institution of traditional authority. When the people begin to see their traditional leaders as extensions of political power — rather than custodians of justice and guardians of community — the sacred trust between subjects and sovereigns fractures. And a chief without trust is like a drum with no skin — beautifully carved, but silent.



Let us remember: Constitutionalism is not a ceremony. It is accountability. It is restraint. It is people power, formalized and protected. A process that lacks open debate, regional balance, and popular mandate may be lawful on paper, but it is void in spirit. For as the elders also say, “Imiti ikula empanga” — the young trees are the future forest. If you plant confusion in the soil of the Constitution today, tomorrow you will harvest distrust.



In conclusion, while the Luapula Chiefs’ statement may sound like unity, it is unity without verification. It is praise without participation. Public interest must not be recited by the powerful on behalf of the silent — it must rise from the people themselves. Let the chiefs advise, let them bless the process, but let the people speak for themselves, for in a democracy, it is the governed who give power its meaning. Not the crown, but the crowd. Not the throne, but the voice in the market.



For in the end, vox populi, vox Dei — the voice of the people is the voice of God. And God, surely, does not whisper only in royal chambers.